Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Happy Meals After Bombs: The Business of American Foreign Policy
The digital world we navigate daily is becoming a minefield of deception. AI technology has reached a frightening new milestone where it can create perfect fake videos—indistinguishable from reality—with no telltale signs of manipulation. This episode explores how this technological shift fundamentally breaks our ability to trust what we see and hear online.
We dive into a chilling examination of how government and corporate interests intertwine in ways most Americans never see. Using the vivid metaphor "bombs for Happy Meals," we unpack how the Pentagon and State Department effectively "cut the wind" for multinational corporations, creating business opportunities through military intervention. The lines between public institutions and private interests have become dangerously blurred, with organizations like the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Gates Foundation operating in a complex ecosystem of government funding and influence.
The recent White House cocaine scandal serves as a case study in narrative manipulation. We analyze how the official story changed multiple times—from finding the substance in the library, to near the situation room, to finally claiming it was in a cubby. These shifting accounts, coupled with contradictory statements about DNA evidence, reveal patterns of deliberate obfuscation that extend far beyond this single incident.
When examining election security concerns, we consider competing narratives about potential fraud—from mechanical issues with mail-in ballots to concerns about voting machine manipulation. These fragmented perspectives might actually serve to distract from understanding the true systems of control at work in our democracy.
What emerges is a sobering assessment of information integrity in modern America. As we navigate this landscape of manufactured reality, our ability to discern truth from manipulation becomes not just a personal skill, but a critical component of preserving what's left of our democratic functions. Join us as we pull back the curtain on the forces shaping our perceptions and the steps we can take to maintain our grip on reality.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Right.
Speaker 2:What's going on, so what does?
Speaker 1:that mean.
Speaker 3:I'll see live on Facebook.
Speaker 1:We're staying live on all these or you're going to relaunch? No, I'm just going to stay live. I'm not sure how to launch it properly. That's the problem. The launch sequence is kind of whack.
Speaker 3:It shows us live on Periscope.
Speaker 2:Periscope is old, periscope was.
Speaker 3:X-streaming like 6-7 years ago.
Speaker 2:Why is this?
Speaker 3:I don't know why it's on the source it says Periscope Sweet damn boys.
Speaker 1:I think that is John.
Speaker 3:Live on MySpace. Did we launch on Myspace? Myspace Live on Myspace.
Speaker 4:Live on the Myspace. Oh, you've got. Oh, uh, Alright well.
Speaker 1:Here all right well.
Speaker 5:Here we go again, dude you, you, you.
Speaker 6:And when they went to the queen to tell her whose cupcakes had no bread, do you know what she said?
Speaker 7:Let them eat cake.
Speaker 1:We're getting screwed man.
Speaker 3:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt Of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background With the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Where's my sound? Good morning Texas. What we have? A double feedback. Yeah, okay, it's gotta be playing somewhere. What's happening? I don't have anything open.
Speaker 3:Hey, good morning everybody. Oh, how you doing? I'm doing fine, thank you. It's a full five-second delay, man, I know it's horrible. I don't know how to deal with it. So what do we do? Okay, someone in the chat's gonna have to tell us is this, is this like killing it? Can you guys hear the feedback? Or is it on our end? Because we never know. That's the hardest thing about all of this we don't know where it came from, why it's happening.
Speaker 4:We're talking to ourselves.
Speaker 3:Oh my gosh, Someone on Rumble? Let us know. Can you hear the double feedback? Oh my gosh, sound on Rumble is good. No feedback.
Speaker 4:Oh my goodness, we're just going to have to deal with this personally. Oh, no, oh no, not sure.
Speaker 1:All right, personally, oh no oh no, not sure.
Speaker 3:All right, well, sound is good. So I guess we're in this fun spot, okay, but I don't even know, I don't even know, okay, well, we're just gonna go?
Speaker 9:I don't even know.
Speaker 3:I don't even know. Okay Well, we're just going to go. So meanwhile, down in Florida, my daughter yesterday called me and she there. Oh yeah, that's way better. I'm sure it is.
Speaker 4:Is that what? It was no, did it Now? Your voice and your video are out of sync by like three seconds. Oh really, I think so, but it's the only way I can make it work. Let's see, let's just go with it okay.
Speaker 3:So we've got this little video here and this is out of florida. My daughter called me yesterday. She lives right, right on the beach like satellite beach, um area and they have manatees going in the water and stuff like that. And you know one of the big my daughter called me yesterday. She lives right on the beach like Satellite Beach area and they have manatees going in the water and stuff like that. And you know, one of the big things down in Florida is boats hit manatees. It's a big deal and manatees are like an interesting creature. Well, I guess there's a little water. Yeah, you know. I mean there's this little viral video of some boaters that hit a manatee and you got to see this because Florida is a wild place. You know the old Florida man joke, like name anything, put Florida man in front of it. You know Florida man runs down the highway naked. Florida man, you know, high on drugs.
Speaker 4:I'm from the days of Adam Carolla, where it was always Germany or Florida. Germany or Florida yeah, he did a segment. For years it was Germany or Florida and you had to guess where the story came from all right, we'll check this out. For years it was Germany or Florida, and you'd had to guess where the story came from. Alright well check this out Buffering. Oh, we're having a great day today, not AI, not AI.
Speaker 1:We are not AI.
Speaker 10:Ciao. Manatee Outrage tonight as video of a boat striking a manatee near Clearwater goes viral, sparking an FWC investigation and one passenger's bizarre defense, claiming they'll move. They did not move. The boat can be seen cruising over the manatees as people off camera scream for it to stop.
Speaker 5:Yeah, I heard someone yelled manatee, but that was after we hit it. By the time he yelled manatee, that thing had a GoFundMe page. It's not I-4, it's the Gulf.
Speaker 10:Murr, the FWC says manatee strikes are on the rise and urges boaters to slow down in protected zones.
Speaker 5:I'm a Floridian. I love manatees. They're like the Roombas of the sea, just floating around bumping into stuff, but let's not act like they're out here paying taxes. Dolphins they see a boat. They're surfing the wake doing synchronized flips. Mantis see a boat and go guess I'll die.
Speaker 10:Wildlife experts remind the public, manatees are protected under Florida law.
Speaker 5:No, I'm not saying we should eat them, but lobsters are ugly and we turn that into a delicacy. You don't think a big juicy mantis gonna taste like? The fwc has not confirmed yet if charges will be filed man, these are like snowbirds in the left lane on 275 just cruising without a care in the world.
Speaker 10:Harry brooks news channel 8 is this totally, I don't know.
Speaker 3:This has got to be totally fake, like the chicken of the sea, like the chicken of the lagoon manatee anyways, I thought that was kind of fun that we'd start to show out that today, um, I had this, um, so this ai thing, right. So one of our, one of our, one of our members in the living room, john, he's been talking about ai and he's been talking about showing you know, present, showing us these videos about just how good it's getting and how yeah, yeah, for sure we've fallen at some point.
Speaker 3:There's no doubt we've fallen victim to, you know, propaganda, fake news, fake videos, but it really is with ai, yeah, with the new age of ai.
Speaker 4:You, you'll you know, I remember watching a video and I remember thinking um something didn't look right, but I didn't know what it was. And it was a few videos later where I started noticing videos where the images were morphing and I was like, oh shit, that's not real, yeah. And then I was like, oh, this is happening all the time. And then I started noticing more and more and more and more, and it's like I don't even know if any of these videos I'm looking at are real.
Speaker 3:There's some new AI program that will create videos. Oh yeah, it does. These man on the street interviews, yeah, that's why I was like it's completely ruined them for me. Like I can't watch a man on the street interview of any flavor now because there's AI videos. They're indistinguishable. You can't, I cannot tell that they're not fake. I cannot like. There's no stitching, there's no. Oh, there's a little awkward mouth movement, nothing. These are perfect videos. Yeah, and I'm, I'm watching and I'm like, oh, I can't ever watch a man on street video because I'll never know. I'll never know if it's real or not.
Speaker 4:Yeah, the only way you know is if they get sloppy and there's a little blip somewhere.
Speaker 3:But with these app things like there's no blip, I know that's the thing. It's not recreating real people, it's recreating AI images and they're perfect. So it's like it is one of those deals where it's like, oh, I, you know, even with the president talking like I got to, I got to actually make sure this is coming from like White House dot gov or Trump's true social. And even when it comes to social, I've got to check it because Trump is absolutely known to kick out some AI, right, I remember.
Speaker 4:Elon Musk. Putting out a video of trump and musk dancing and putting people will think this is ai.
Speaker 3:I could be comfortable with my skin because this is probably fake so imagine a situation where uh, a and this is totally futuristic nonsense, okay, so I don't want any anybody thinking this is actually happening, but or that we actually believe it. Yeah, wrap your head around this. Um, a scenario where, every time a plane takes off from an airport, there's sniper fire at the plane. People are getting hit on takeoffs and landings, so, all of a sudden, air travel becomes not something you're going to want to do. It's like fly at your own risk. It's the haiti situation. You know what happened down in haiti? No, a couple airplanes got shot at on landing and takeoff and they shut down flights to haiti for like a month oh, like the only people that would fly in that were like dupai airlines, you know.
Speaker 3:I mean, that was then. They were, you know, because the gang couldn't control the gangs around the airport. They're shooting at airplanes. Imagine, imagine a situation in america with all the guns we have and all the hunting, rifle bolt actions. It doesn't take much to pierce through an airplane shell. Imagine a situation where flying on an airplane becomes Russian roulette, with getting popped.
Speaker 4:Yeah, not interested in that.
Speaker 3:Not interested in that right. Okay, in a situation where fuel prices are $8, $9 a gallon. So you, you know, traveling across the country for recreation is like not happening, cost prohibitive 90 of the country. Okay, yeah, and then a foreign invading alien army drops down, sets up a wall, a lot along the east coast of the mississippi and when would you ever cross the mississippi? Probably never so now everything we know about what's happening on the east coast is coming from social media and online and it's all fake and it's all fake gangs in new york.
Speaker 3:Yep, only 2050 has been taken to the back side of the moon, but we're watching ai videos of him giving press conferences and asking questions on the way. I was long. This sounds like the last four years yeah, well, do you?
Speaker 3:yeah, do you remember biden putting his hand through the phone? Like stupid stuff like why are we having separate press reef? You know, when you're in a White House, press room looks like it. You built up that tiny little room but you did it on a separate building in a green screen, and all the journalists are just going along with it. Like none of them are saying they're broadcasting from a satellite location, they're just saying we're in the White House and they're not.
Speaker 4:Maybe they're so fake. Exactly so this is like.
Speaker 3:I'm presenting a world where, very reasonable, you know logical reasons why no one's traveling internationally, why we're not getting personal news, but you can get on and have a Zoom call with your family in Boston because AI has got that taken care of. You know, I mean, I'm not taking it instead of a big eastern half of the US, a small city just disappeared. You know, like that's weird, this is weird, so I don't know, I'm just throwing it out there.
Speaker 4:That's a great one to spin up.
Speaker 3:Yeah, there's a gentleman that named John Kirkalo who was attacked by the government and I'm using that word more and more, attack now, simply because I understand it. There's different things. There's testing, like when you try to stand on your rights, they'll test you. That's one thing, right, it's another thing when they'll attack you. So this guy got attacked and he's going to talk about basically his experience and and how the government will use blackmail and use the threat of prosecution or actual prosecution for completely political purposes, for agenda-driven reasons. So this is one of those things. Put this in your tool belt.
Speaker 3:This particular by story doesn't matter the pattern happens over and, over and over again and this is why you can't really trust, even like the DOJ or anything, because they're up to shenanigans like this.
Speaker 12:I had been told by the FBI that I was going to be arrested on Monday. This was a Thursday. The reason why the FBI tries to arrest people on Thursdays is because the federal courts are closed on Fridays for arra a Thursday. The reason why the FBI tries to arrest people on Thursdays is because the federal courts are closed on Fridays for arraignments. They don't arraign anybody, and so you have to spend Thursday night, friday night, saturday night and Sunday night in the DC jail where you're going to be beaten and God knows what other horrible things happen to a guy in a suit in the DC jail.
Speaker 12:But I said the magic words to the FBI I want to speak to my attorney, and that was the only thing that saved me. They had to let me go to speak to my attorney and they called the attorney and said we'll let him turn himself in on Monday morning. So I did, but they were completely surrounding my house. My neighbors were calling, saying, hey, I got up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom and there's a guy sitting in front of your house just staring at your house. I had to say, well, there's another guy right there and there's another one over here and there are two behind us and they followed us into church on Sunday. They followed us into Target when we went shopping. It was very, very heavy surveillance in your face kind of surveillance. Before I got in trouble, I was the senior investigator on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, working for John Kerry, who was the chairman at the time, and one of the wonderful things about that job is you get to have lunch with foreign diplomats from all over the world.
Speaker 12:You have to pay for your own lunch because we had very serious ethical guidelines. But I just loved the exchange. So I got a call from a Japanese diplomat. The number three in the Japanese embassy introduced himself and invited me to lunch. So I remember that lunch being delightful. We talked about Israeli elections and Turkish elections and the peace process, and I also remember that his English was so bad that we did most of the conversation in Arabic. His Arabic was excellent. So at the end of the lunch he said to me what's next for you? And I said well, I think I'm going to resign soon. I promised Senator Kerry I'd give him two years and it's been two and a half and I'm ready to move on and do something else. And very excitedly he said no, don't do that. If you give me information, I can give you money. And I said what's wrong with you cold pitching me like that? I have to report this now. What are you thinking? And I went directly to the office of the Senate security officer and I said I was just pitched by a foreign intelligence officer. So he had me write up a memo which he sent to the FBI.
Speaker 12:Two days later, the FBI sent two agents to interview me and they said here's what we want you to do. We want you to call him back, invite him to lunch and try to get him to tell you exactly what information he wants and how much money he's willing to pay for it. I said, fine, you want me to wear a wire? They said no, we're going to be at the next table, so we'll just listen to the conversation. I said fine. So I invited him to lunch. We had lunch. He gave me all the information, I should add. They called me that morning to say something had come up. They weren't going to be there, but I should just go ahead with the lunch and write him another memo. So I did the lunch. I wrote a second memo. They asked me to do it a third time and a fourth time and a fifth time, which I did. Finally, in the fifth lunch, he said he had been promoted, he got his dream job and he was transferring to Cairo. He was going to be the number two at the Japanese embassy in Cairo. I said yeah, congratulations. I shook his hand, never saw him again.
Speaker 12:A year later, after my arrest, the Justice Department turns Discovery over to my attorneys and we see in Discovery that there never was any Japanese diplomat. He was an FBI agent undercover trying to get me to commit real espionage because they wanted to charge me with espionage. Another thing we found it was a series of memos from the CIA to the Justice Department and back. The CIA wrote to the Justice Department and said charge him with espionage. And the Justice Department responded and said but he hasn't committed espionage. And the CIA wrote back again and said charge him anyway and make him defend himself. And so the FBI thought well, he hasn't committed espionage, maybe we can trick him into committing espionage. And then that's usually 30 or 35 year sentence. But I kept reporting the contact. Every time this guy would offer up something, I would write a memo and send it to the FBI and finally they came to the conclusion that I was not going to commit espionage. And so they just dropped it and came up with the cover story of him being transferred to Cairo.
Speaker 10:But it gives you an idea of how badly they wanted to get you.
Speaker 3:So he is the one who disclosed the torture that the cia was doing. He's the one exposing the cia's torture program. Remember my friend, the russian espionage agent that was meeting with the woman in philadelphia oh, yeah, yeah it was like a couch surfing troll, yeah, and ends up getting the same thing. It's just total entrapment. It's crazy anyways put that in your cap of. That's how they behave. Yesterday, when we were oh bro, what just happened? What did I do? Oh, I just closed all my tabs.
Speaker 4:Oh shoot well, we can't tell oh there's back okay it just disappeared.
Speaker 3:I, I got a Mac, things disappear, okay, so no conspiracy there, that just happens. Yesterday in the interview with Scott Christensen, which, if you're an audio listener, we got issues yesterday. It was a long show, but anyways, in our interview we were talking about the FBI being kind of like Gestapo, and this is what we're talking about. The CIA hey, go after this guy. He exposed something horrible that we're doing. You're torturing people. That's the crime. That's the crime. That's the crime.
Speaker 1:The cover up going after this guy for telling the world that you've committed that crime.
Speaker 3:Even worse, that's another crime. That's another crime, right. But you're going after this guy. I mean, wow, crime, that's another crime, right. But you're going after this guy. I mean, wow. And with all of the stuff that's gone on, there has been a litany of scandals. I mean we've covered our share, all of which are unresolved. Yeah, and here's julie kelly on war room yesterday and she's basically this is an interesting clip because she's basically like let's move on from epstein like nothing's ever going to happen, and let's move on from epstein like nothing's ever going to happen, and let's get on to j6 and, and bannon's taking the other approach like whoa, whoa, whoa. You know we've got more than that going on. So let's just listen to the back and forth here and then we'll add our little two cents I also don't care about the epstein information.
Speaker 8:I don't care about those files. I think it's irrelevant. Uh, no one is going to be charged, everyone got away with it, and I would much rather dig into january 6th, much better you've got to get.
Speaker 11:No, I just have never cared about it because in the fall you're gonna find out the car. I know. But no, no, but I'm saying it's, it's. You'll get to the cover-up of exactly what the cover-up was. They're even admitting they got these tapes and things. This is cash and, pam, you've got to get it. Once you get into these things, they're rich. As you know, julie, you've done it yourself with no resource at all, just doing it yourself. You understand, as you start these investigations, every day you're telling me hey, I found this, I found this. The process itself delivers Once you have intention and start moving down.
Speaker 8:I also don't care about that. I don't care about those files.
Speaker 3:Her take is she doesn't care about the Epstein files, just move on.
Speaker 4:That just feels like you're running cover.
Speaker 3:I don't OK. So I've met Julie Kelly, right, I don't think she's running cover.
Speaker 3:I think that's what it feels like. I think this is what happens with people that get in the pungent fear and the blogosphere, that get in the pundit sphere and the blogosphere, and we live in this world where you can walk into the fbi with your badge and you can be like you're arrested, you're arrested, you're arrested, you're under investigation, for you think that you can do that, right, you think that the judge is going to go? Oh my gosh, look this is plain as day. Treason, right. Oh, oh my gosh. Yeah, you're denied bond, you know. You think that that this right process would be followed, and then you go sit in court hearings that aren't allowed to be televised and you can't have electronic devices. You get a transcript, maybe if you pay for it, six months later. So you get judges in there that are rolling their eyes. You get prosecution in there that's submitting motions and giggling because they know it's not lawful, and judges, you know, supporting support.
Speaker 4:I understand what you're saying.
Speaker 3:You see that there's just this wall. So when she's thinking about Epstein she's like some of these judges are probably on those videos.
Speaker 4:Yeah.
Speaker 3:It's no it's not going to go anywhere. Like until you are willing to impeach a judge, you're not going to get a judge. You know what I mean. They become part of the cover up. And then what we just played with the guy that gets targeted for exposing it. So you're an FBI agent who's like, ok, I'm ready to to write the indictment on some guy. And then next thing you know you've got child pornography on your computer. Or you know, you find out your wife's involved in some kind of weird. She wasn't an MLM but turns out it's a big money laundering.
Speaker 4:I know but it seems like. It seems like the entire program of the left is to complete. You know continuously to say let's move on to the next thing and let's never resolve any of these things ever.
Speaker 3:I agree, and her thing is, let's get to J6, and you know, I know, but then for how long?
Speaker 4:until they go? Oh, we're tired of that. Let's move on to the next thing. Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3:Well, move on to the next thing. Yeah, exactly. Well, let's just not resolve anything ever. Just for a refresher what we're up against when we're talking epstein we have worlds colliding. It's not just the far left, it's not just you know that cohort. There's a lot of right wingers to oh yeah than this and people that we're not comfortable with. For example, one of the people that always comes up when a discussion of Jeffrey Epstein and you start digging in is this Bill.
Speaker 9:Clark connection Died in prison. I totally agree with your analysis. There's no way both security cameras glitch out, both security guards fall asleep, that the visitor log page is ripped out of the notebook. And who was the head of the Justice Department at the time that that happened? Under it was Bill Barr.
Speaker 9:Bill Barr was the CIA's mop-up man. He told his high school guidance counselor this is in his own autobiography that his dream job was to run the CIA. His first job was working for the CIA. His first seven years of his career he spent at the CIA. He went to Knight Law School while he was at the CIA, basically worked through law school with the CIA.
Speaker 9:His first job out of law school was protecting the CIA from the Iran-Contra investigation when the CIA was perceived to have gone rogue to work in tandem with Santos Traficante and the whole Tampa and Louisiana and network and Miami in order to run guns to the Nicaraguan Contras and to work with all the different paramilitary groups that needed guns and laundered money all over Operation Operation Condor and Iran-Contra there. When Congress tried to investigate the CIA, it was Bill Barr. Literally, the Washington Post described him as the mop-up man, the CIA's mop-up man, to block congressional inquiry into Iran-Contra. He then becomes the head of the justice department twice, you know, the second time under trump. And not only that. Bill barr's father, donald barr, was the mentor to jeffrey epstein. He was literally, you know, was a student of of uh, bill barr's dad, at the same high school yeah, I mean, I've mentioned it before, bill parton wrote
Speaker 3:a book about sex trafficking kids in space and a fictional book about sex trafficking and kids in space and cargo spaceships. Uh, was a high school principal. Yeah, hired epstein, okay that's like.
Speaker 3:And then you know epstein goes and hooks up with glaine maxwell, whose dad, max thomas maxwell, gave the first loan to Bain Capital, to Mitt Romney. I mean it's just wow, bill Barr. So that's one of the things. When you look at Trump's first term, what is the possibility? Bill Barr, indoctrinated in the CIA it's his first job Goes to law school while he's at the CIA, comes out, works at the CIA as an attorney, becomes the head of the DOJ twice. The Iran-Contra thing they did a big investigation into it. He put it on executive summary, saying nothing to see here. A couple of years later, when Clinton uncovered it, there was a lot to see there. Bill Barr said the opposite of what you know. So then whenuller report came out and he gave an executive summary and said nothing to see here, the democrats lost their minds because they thought he did it again and then they released the whole report and turns out this time he accurately summarized muller's investigation.
Speaker 3:Right, but what if bar was the mop-up man? What if bar came in, the one to say if there is a there, there, you know he would give the credibility to an impeachment or to the charges. You see what I'm saying.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 3:And I'm just saying people are conflicted in all different directions, conflicted in all different directions, and some of the most important people in the world, the CIA running DOJ, like, oh you know, qatar, qatar, qatar, it's basically a CIA cutout state. You know, matt Gates talked about this. Well, qatar is bad, he's like, or it's good, depends on what department you're dealing with. Like you know, that whole the existence of that country is basically there's a CIA base there, dofar right, like he's like, it's the CIA cutout. He's like. We got to have friends in the neighborhood. It's a bad neighborhood to be in, and so we work through Qatar.
Speaker 3:So sometimes you see things in Qatar that are horrible, like sponsorship of the Muslim Brotherhood, but then you also see things coming out of Qatar that are incredibly positive, like peace talks and things like that. It's cut out state, it's all cut out state. Most of reality that we see isn't real. I mean, you look at this situation here. Okay, so we've got the big things that they're wanting to look at, that bongino and cash. They've reopened the january 6 pipe bond investigation, which we won't really go into any detail on that today, but they've reopened this cocaine in the white house deal and the epstein thing.
Speaker 3:These are what they're looking into right trying to get to the bottom of it so this is jesse waters doing the breakdown on the cocaine scandal in the white house. Now some people again this is one of those things, everybody's got a different barometer. Some people are hyper concerned about epstein and the trafficking. I could see how some people are just like listen, I don't know who the the victims are. I mean every time they say there's this, he's the biggest drug trap. You know kid trafficker in the world. You know they trot out three or four victims. Meanwhile we got 300 000 missing kids over here with dhs yeah right.
Speaker 3:So where's the real pan? You know, where's the real issue? Are they connected? Or are these, you know, is this epstein thing a ruse to distract us from the real trafficker, which is dhs? Yeah, and health and human services and all that. But what rfk was saying? Right, because remember epstein went from being the most prolific human trafficker you know, child trafficker in the world to rfk openly stating hhs, not dhs.
Speaker 3:Hhs was the largest human trafficker in the world openly stating that in a cabinet meeting on the record cameras everywhere not deep fake, we're pretty sure. Yeah, so where? Where? Where's the balance there? I can see why people are just like Epstein's dead. So give me someone living. You know what I mean, like I don't care. The cocaine in the White House? Ok, rich people do drugs, great, yeah, well, yeah, but they put you in jail for doing it. So the hypocrisy here screams as well as you know, they keep telling us that your mind's not straight when you're on drugs. So destruction be anywhere near the white house where there's decision makers. Yeah, like making tough decisions.
Speaker 3:This is good okay none of this is good, so so so. Some people view the cocaine scandal as a as a symptomatic scandal. Some view people view as an independent scandal. I view it as one of those things if you can't figure out whose cocaine that is, uh, that puts into question all the research you do for other drug busts and whatnot Like do we really have fingerprint technology and DNA technology or not?
Speaker 3:Like, I'm not really. If you can't figure out who put that in the cubby. You know there's 400 people that came in the White House that day. Pretty sure you can interview every single one of them.
Speaker 4:Well, if anybody stuck their fingers in that bag, they should be able to get a DNA on it.
Speaker 3:Yeah, just in on that bag. They should be able to get a dna on it. Yeah, and just in general, it's like you could interview every single person. Yeah, there's probably 5 000 cameras that saw somebody put it down and if you can get a baggie of cocaine in there, why couldn't you get a baggie of anthrax in there?
Speaker 4:yeah, I mean this starts.
Speaker 3:This starts to get a little. This is a, you know, this is a secret service. Just what's going on. So let's hear jesse waters talk about it.
Speaker 16:Boyd, the Secret Service, over the cocaine investigation and we just got back over 100 pages of documents and the Secret Service has been lying to you about everything. Here's why when the cocaine was first found, they said it was in the library where the first family lives.
Speaker 1:We have a yellow bar stating cocaine. Hi, Dr Coran. Thank you, and that's found in the library.
Speaker 16:Then there were reports that the cocaine was actually found outside the situation room.
Speaker 13:Now the investigation has progressed and so they're saying the West Executive Entrance which, as you noted, is closer to the situation room.
Speaker 16:The Secret Service then said no, it was in a cubby with a lot of foot traffic around it and, yes, there are cameras, but that particular cubby was in a blind spot. How do you mistake the library for the situation room and the situation room for the cubbies? Because when I'm in a library I know I'm in a library because there's books everywhere. Does it look like there's books everywhere? That's a wall of cubbies. They say the Coke was found in locker number 50, right there in the middle, and there's a key missing. And what do you think? The chances are that the Secret Service has the key, because Primetime thinks the Coke may have been planted in the cubby after it was found in the library. Good thing we have the documents from the Secret Service right here. But here's the thing the Secret Service redacted where the cocaine was first found. If the cocaine was actually first found in the cubby and they photographed it in the cubby why would they redact that?
Speaker 1:And at one point the Secret Service says why would they redact that?
Speaker 16:And at one point the secret service says no-transcript. What lobby floor the lobby? Into what room? The library. And I thought they found the cocaine in the cubby. Well, the cubby's not on the floor, the cubby's on the wall.
Speaker 16:You guys are all asking the wrong question and they didn't redact that they want us to think it was found in that little locker and initially, after the hazmat team tested it, the white powder came back positive for opioids and amphetamines. It was only after additional tests that they determined it to be cocaine. And that's confusing, because on the audio you heard from hazmat it was cocaine hydrochloride, a white powdery opioid, that's fentanyl. Maybe I thought these tests were supposed to be accurate. So far this bag has tested positive for opioids, amphetamines, cocaine, caffeine and baking soda.
Speaker 1:Here's where it gets, even more suspicious.
Speaker 16:They told us they didn't find any DNA, but the documents say they did. Remember the Coke baggie's been blown up. The Secret Service took the evidence from Quantico and they destroyed it. They didn't want the FBI to have it, but there's more evidence that they didn't destroy An envelope with three tubes of DNA. Where'd they get the DNA from? They got the DNA off the baggie. So the Secret Service lied and so did the White House. They did find DNA on the baggie and the DNA was processed and has been moved to an evidence vault for preservation, so right where they keep the jfk files.
Speaker 16:An insurance policy we asked the secret service for an explanation, and they said, oh, it's secondary dna, but the initial secret service clearly said there was no d DNA found and there is no physical evidence.
Speaker 16:But the documents show they're keeping a DNA sample in an evidence locker. Is this so Biden's dog bites another agent? They have something we don't know and the Secret Service told primetime they may end up destroying the DNA evidence at some point down the road. You know protocol. Primetime asked the Secret Service why didn't you take DNA samples from your suspect list? They said they would have needed a court order. This tells me two things the Secret Service didn't want to crack the case. Secret Service didn't want to crack the case or the Secret Service knew the coke was found in the library and put it in a cubby and closed the case. Oh, okay.
Speaker 1:Here's another question for you.
Speaker 4:How come you guys are all assuming there's only one bag? That's good too. There's probably shit tons of coke everywhere.
Speaker 3:There's coke everywhere, everywhere dogs in.
Speaker 3:We don't usually bring the drug sniffers in the white house. Seriously, it the patterns, the patterns. There was another time when there was stuff that was being reported in live time and later reports came out that changed things. But in retrospect it's like really funny that the accounting department like I'm just thinking 9-11. It was like really weird that the accounting department like got hit by an airplane. And it's really weird that Building 7, which wasn't hit by an airplane, where the FBI and Secret Service had offices with evidence lockers collapsed. Huh.
Speaker 4:Yeah, weird, you know nothing like this ever happened.
Speaker 7:CNN's military affairs correspondent, Jamie McIntyre. Jamie, you got very close to where that plane went down.
Speaker 1:That's right, judy. A while ago I walked right up to the next of the building. Firefighters were still trying to put out the blaze. The fire, by the way, is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon and I took a look at the huge gaping hole that's in the sideway. But from my close-up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only fight is the actual side of the building that's crashed in and, as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around.
Speaker 3:Yeah, you know lifetime, but then that story you know that was life. That was smoldering ashes still, you know, by the time the evening hit it was outside the Pentagon. Cnn's military, you know. And Building 7 also collapsed because there was a fire burning downstairs. Why the fire start downstairs?
Speaker 4:I was just thinking you know we have somebody we need to interview. Who's that? My wife's cousin? Okay, he was at the pentagon and doing the cleanup. Yeah, yeah, we should talk to him.
Speaker 3:We should get some straight answers, yeah so in a world where you're being fed one thing but a different reality is happening. That's what I want to show here. You know we're in an AI world where it's going to get compartmentalized really quick If they can keep us from connecting with each other if they can keep us from traveling and actually putting our eyes on situations outside of our little realm they gotcha, you gotcha.
Speaker 3:And they got people living in a world online where they take the rage that they have online and they take it right out into the streets yeah right, so keep in mind you know, let me show you this uh that's how you get mcdonald's ragers mcdonald's ragers. Yeah, and keep in mind, this is caught in context and here in seattle we're dealing with this. So this is a detransitioner. So this woman is. This woman is detransitioning from having pretended to be a man, I assume.
Speaker 12:Okay.
Speaker 3:And so she's going to one of these little speeches and you know, this is our little hometown here.
Speaker 2:This is Seattle okay.
Speaker 3:So the reason I'm showing you this is a couple things. One you've got antifa media here. Look at the camera angle. I mean they're just completely in on this. But they're creating this environment where people get stirred up, right, they're trying to get that 1% of people that are sympathetic with transgenders to take action and come out into the streets. And you know they wear their gas mask. I thought on January 6th it was crazy when people showed up with gas masks like, oh, you're just expecting a fight, right, well, gas masks like, oh, you're just expecting a fight, right, well, I mean, look at, look at what's going on here. So I'm showing that because to those people that are attacking that detransitioner, to the people that are attacking, christians in the streets.
Speaker 3:This is real to them. Yeah right, this is real to them. It's as every bit as real as january 6th was to me. The difference is sometimes things are real and real, real and sometimes things are completely made up.
Speaker 4:Well, this is not. It's not cosplay.
Speaker 3:It's not cosplay, yeah, ok, but you're defending people's right for cosplay Right. This is coming down to All right. So, with all that in mind, the subterfuge, the double speak that we have, here is a interview that Sean Ryan did with one of these guys connected to the Taliban.
Speaker 2:Thank you Right now, interview that Sean Ryan did with one of these guys connected to the Taliban, how the United States is actually funding the Taliban, which funds kind of everything. The simplest way I could say it right here, right now American taxpayer money, your tax dollars, are funding the Taliban right now, and this has been going on since September 2021. On a weekly basis, the United States, the current administration, mr Joe Biden has been sending $40 million, not from his own checking account, it's the US payers, americans' tax dollars. He's sending them $40 million cash every week that ends up in Afghanistan and it's a very complex system. The money goes to the Afghanistan International Bank that lacks any authority to convert this dollar to Afghani, to auction it Right, and so this money AIB gives it to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan. When I say Central Bank, think Federal Reserves, so the money goes there.
Speaker 2:Now, who is in charge of Afghanistan's Central Bank right now? Noura Ahmad Oghaw, sanctioned terrorist, sanctioned by the United States for financing IED attacks against our soldiers that killed American soldiers. He runs the central bank. He gets $40 million every week. Now, once the money reaches the central bank, they hold what is called a bidding and auctioning session, where they invite individuals that are involved with the Hawala system licensed money dealers. They invite them and they're bidding. Everyone bids on who wants to buy this dollar.
Speaker 3:That's how they do it Huh.
Speaker 4:That's just money laundering straight up and we know we're doing that.
Speaker 3:So this is one of the things that was recently uncovered. They talked about this before. That was back when Biden was still in power. Yeah, let's go, brandon recently came back in the news again like hey, why are we still doing that? Well, 40 million a week is cheaper than prosecuting a war over there, but at the same time, what are we doing?
Speaker 4:yeah, just stop sending the checks do you know?
Speaker 3:do you know how? Do you know how the drug cartels in south america went from not just being big powerful, you drug cartels, but to actually get into the game in oil and all the other things?
Speaker 4:I don't know how they did it, but I know they're doing it now.
Speaker 3:So one of the ways they have it, our Federal Reserve launders the drug money. So Colorado was the first state to legalize weed. But it's against the law federally. So you can't get a bank account. So you get a weed dispensary, but you can't. It's it's against the law federally. So you can't get a bank account right. So you get a weed dispensary, but you can't have a bank account.
Speaker 3:So these are cash. Rich environments right, and they have to pay a sales tax. But these, these pot stores in colorado, when they first started opening up, I mean they had they had larger safes than they had room to sell the product. Yeah right, I mean they were just holding on to millions and millions of dollars in cash.
Speaker 4:That's a problem in Washington, too early on, yeah.
Speaker 3:Well, anytime you got cash laying around it's rife to add more cash to it.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 3:You know what I mean. So what happened was one morning, in a coordinated raid, the government came in and I don't know exactly which entity IRS, atf, whatever they all team up, they all teamed up and, on behalf of the Federal Reserve, they went in to these pot shops and confiscated the dollar bills. What? Yeah, because they own them, it says at the top.
Speaker 4:Federal.
Speaker 3:Reserve. They own it. Render under Caesar with Caesars. Who does it belong to? It's a Federal Reserve. Note that is an obligation of the Federal Reserve and their creditors. But weren't they like? Hey man, I was borrowing those. Well, here's what they did. They confiscated the dollar bills and they gave them a coin, a digital coin, because most money is not dollars, it's digital, sure and once it's digital, they can track everything this is on a ledger somewhere, so they gave them a it's, it's called a.
Speaker 3:It's called a uh, a federal reserve coin or whatever. So they basically said here's your. Is that like a shit coin? Well, it's just a digital coin? I can't remember there's a better name for it, but they gave them a like a token a token, yeah, a token, for the money so they gave them the money back.
Speaker 3:I said but basically the federal reserve is the bank. Like you can't have a bank at wells, fargo or chase, so we have to go to the top level and we can. We can give you a bank at wells, fargo or chase. So we have to go to the the top level and we can. We can give you a bank. That's where arms dealers bank.
Speaker 3:You know it's against the law to sell arms unless you're the united states of america. You know what I mean why? Oh, because we use different banks. It's pretty much what it boils down to huh, okay, so that's that. So the Federal Reserve. So when the cartel saw that, oh well, that's a lot easier than getting car washes, yeah, just put the money in the vault and once a month the Federal Reserve shows up and takes the cash and gives a token. Right, they've been doing that knowingly because they want to control the money. In other amazing news We've had, we, the inflation report came out last week. We've had so many things that have kind of happened, so the inflation report came out last week in in in another episode of the news is all fake. The sky is not falling, or it is.
Speaker 4:Inflation is higher than 2%. What's going on?
Speaker 3:So there's the inflation report that came out, the show that inflation was low and so, fortunately, on this box business show he had lafferty and I can't remember the other guy's name, but he had them both on, and one was like inflation's not going to be a thing, tariffs aren't going to be a problem. The other guys, tariffs are going to raise prices.
Speaker 4:It's going to be horrible I love it when they get that mr wonderful on.
Speaker 3:He's always straight shooter these guys, uh, squared it off and it is a, then it is an inflation premium.
Speaker 13:Steve Moore, I'd say it's a pretty calm inflation report. This is from Unleashed Prosperity. I don't see much going on. Look, I've been wrong. I thought these tariffs would cause higher inflation. Tariffs are taxes and consumers bear some of the costs of that, but it just doesn't showing up in the numbers right now. It just really isn't. And if you look at, you know any almost any measure of inflation. Right now it's pretty tame. I mean somewhere in the two and a half to three percent range, which is a little bit higher than we want, but hardly a catastrophe. And I want to make one other quick point. You know there was that slight increase in the what was it? The 30-year bond interest rate. And oh my God, you know the world's coming to an end, but that rate isn't really up much, and neither is the 10-year. So the point that I think a lot of people miss, it's not deficits that ruin the economy, it's government spending. So bring the spending down.
Speaker 3:yes, no, just good point, um, I would also say, by the way, all right, this is a moment of clarity, kind of like there's no tell sections over here. Hey, we found it in the library. I mean the cubby, the cubby, right, this is, this is. This guy had a narrative tariffs are bad. He was going on the talking points. He's a host of a money show and now he's like oh, numbers are great, tariffs haven't had an impact. You know what? It's government spending. That's the problem. This is that moment of clarity before he got his next set of talking points. Does that make sense? Because we're about to pass a bill with no cuts in government spending and yet you want to blame the what will be the bad economy on the tariffs. But in this little moment where you've got tariffs that have taken place, you've had the numbers run. You haven't passed any spending, anything, nothing. You know what I mean? You can. It highlights the problem. He had this moment of clarity. It's government spending. It's the only thing that causes it.
Speaker 3:Trump stopped the excess government spending. He stagnated it and then grew into it. Does that make sense? That's all it was. This is like as a business owner who's had a business a couple times. That's the excess government spending. He stagnated it and then grew into it. Does that make sense? That's all it was. This is like as a business owner who's had a business a couple of times. It's been in the red growth right Growth. That's why, when he comes back with these investments, you think it's good. Now imagine what it will be in two or three years when those investments really start to hit. So again, another world of what you see on tv is fake. There it's tell live vision, constantly tell live vision.
Speaker 4:They're programming you um okay, another concept to keep track of we've had.
Speaker 3:I feel like we've had these discombobulated shows and I wanted to get some of this information out, like put it on the. I consider it like the show is kind of constantly building, so like put it on the table so that we can refer to it in the future. So this is a Mike Benz clip with Tucker Carlson and he's talking about the donor class and the blob and just kind of how the money works, but most importantly he's he's explaining the relationship between corporations and the United States government and the Pentagon and the State Department and how the United States is a business Like. Again, there's things that us peasants don't really understand, because To us the United States is freedom and liberty and family and country and church and backyard barbecues and sweet tea, lemonade. You know that's what America is to us. And off my lawn.
Speaker 1:Off my lawn, but when you're talking, about the United States government.
Speaker 3:The United States government doesn't participate in your backyard barbecues. The United States government does not show up at your local weddings. The United States government doesn't make sense. It isn't a thing, it doesn't care, it has no morality. Yeah, and if they want to go on your lawn, they just go on your lawn.
Speaker 3:The United States government is. The United States government is a business interest and it has other things that are business interests, and what happens is the mechanisms, the carrots and the sticks for business is this never ending search for profit and balanced books. Okay, it's like this, never ending, depending on your motivation, right? If you're a nonprofit, or you're supposed to be nonprofit, you're not looking for profit, you're just looking for balanced books. It doesn't mean you can't spend to oblivion, you just want to balance the books. That's all it is. You just got to balance the books at the end.
Speaker 4:If you're a for-profit, you want to show a profit, so you can. I only shareholder. You got to make happy yeah exactly so.
Speaker 3:Understanding this explains our foreign relations, because corporations and governments see the world as a business. They don't see the barbecues, they don't see the christenings and the family events and they don't see the trauma and the struggle of growing and maturing and raising kids.
Speaker 4:Those are interests that they don't participate in any of that. Those are interests that they don't have any interest in.
Speaker 3:They don't participate in any of that. They don't care what your customs are. They don't care that you have special holidays, interest sleeps, for no one. Business doesn't care. When the government runs like a business and it loses its humanity, you end up with this kind of stuff.
Speaker 9:Everyone understands the concept of big donors having a big influence on politics. Not only do they largely play the key role in determining who's president through the funding that they provide, but I say donor drafter because they draft off the policies off of the US government. They don't just donate into it. Like in a bike race, you always want to be not in first, you want to be right behind the guy in first so that the guy in first is cutting the wind for you, so that you don't suffer the cost of the extra exertion to cut the wind. The Pentagon cuts the wind for companies, for multinational corporations. The State Department cuts the wind for multinational corporations and private equity funds and the whole financial overclass, the CIA.
Speaker 3:The simple concept of this is every time there's war, business follows. You know, war is good for business. It opens up new strategy. That's a great way to say it it cuts the wind it cuts the wind right when you come in and bomb the crap out of vietnam.
Speaker 3:Kbr and then within a decade you're opening up mcdonald's. Mcdonald's was delivered by those bombs. The happy meal came later, you know, but that's the whole thing. Like you, if a country that's doing it right is protectionist by nature, that's it. Because if it's doing it right and it's connected correctly, it protects the backyard barbecue and the christenings, and does that make sense? And it says, hey, you know what? That mcdonald's thing doesn't work for us, it's unhealthy. But when the bombs, the bombs proceed, it McDonald's follows Same concept. You show up, take over a place and next thing you know they're driving Fords.
Speaker 9:Touch the wind for corporations and financial firms. Usaid touch the wind, and so you have these figures like George Soros, for example, and Bill Gates, who are now obviously very well renowned in the NGO world, the Open Society Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, rockefeller, carnegie Foundation, ford Foundation All of these have corporations and financial firms attached to their philanthropy. So they will receive funding from the US government, from USAID, or their portfolio assets will, or their portfolio NGOs or companies will, but they will also donate into it, and I bring this up because oftentimes they are paid by the government, but oftentimes they're actually paying into a government project that advances some other interest okay, so they're paying into these programs.
Speaker 3:So, like, the ford foundation will put a million dollars into some project and then they'll go get grants for another 10 million dollars from usa, id and next thing, you know, they're, uh, you know, building car, building car plants in the congo. You know what I'm saying. Like, yeah, they lead the way carnegie ford, rockefeller, bill and hillary bill, hillary clinton foundation, the bill and melinda gates foundation, the. There's trillions and trillions of dollars, government dollars, flowing through these ngos. And you know these, the, the big dogs, the pentagon, the state department cut the wind. That's a great example of it.
Speaker 3:Yeah, so the interest of america is business. This is why we go back to these same old themes as peasants. These are easy things to remember. You vote with your eyes, your dollars and your clicks, right. It's important. It's important that you support companies that support us. It's important that you divert attention dollars from those that don't. How you go about doing that? Good luck, because everything is junk, right. I mean, there's almost nothing that doesn't touch and have dirty tentacles in some form of corruption. Like, I don't want to buy gas at Chevron because I understand that Chevron's connected with the Venezuela thing and I understand that the Venezuela, the narco terrorists, are running our government. So I want to do what little bit I can to try to get Chevron to wake up and realize that we'll stop buying Chevron gas.
Speaker 4:And even if you go to a mom and pop, chances are they have stuff there that's made in China and you know you can't avoid that.
Speaker 1:Can't avoid it.
Speaker 4:And you want to try to, you know, invest and put money to mom and pops, but it's so hard when everything's available from Amazon or Walmart, yes, so everybody's got to do it in their own way right and I don't have.
Speaker 3:I don't have a netflix account, but I have an amazon prime account. Sure, right, something to argue goes listen, netflix ticked me off one day and we've gone multiple years without a netflix account because I felt like the cutest thing to me was just over the top and it was like this long line and then they put the obamas on the board. I'm done, okay, so just make your decision right. So I want to avoid chevron gas. Well, it turns out chevron on shell or shell on chevron. Okay, there's the other gas station, all right. So now I'm like looking around, where's this phillips? You know? I don't even want to know, just phillips 76 of any association I don't even want to know right, but it's.
Speaker 3:but that's the thing I'm doing, what little I can. Am I going to avoid Chevron every time? Absolutely not. Am I going to avoid Shell every time? Absolutely not. But when I can make a choice, I will. I'm trying to take control of my choices because that's all I have. That's all I have. These big groups they put on the front of aid, but at the end of the day it's bombs for Happy Meals. That's what it boils down to be every single time. That's why, at the end, you know, we talk about bankers, wars and all this stuff. It's suffering. We, the peasants, pay the price. We're the ones who kind of get screwed every time. Right, okay, is going on here is a little bit of a a situation where we've got to always be aware of our sources and always be constantly checking things.
Speaker 3:so we play something bad oh, not at all so I'm a big believer in the patrick burn narrative okay, I'm a big believer in his story of events and his facts as he lays them out. I'm a big fan of people who put their money where their mouth is and stick with it. I also recognize that we're only as good as the information we have. There's two tracks when we're talking about elections. There's one track that wants to look at the 13 ways that Patrick Burns says that they have figured out how to commit election fraud. There is a Chinese institute that has thousands of people that they study all 3000 counties in America and they know the election rules down to the County.
Speaker 4:Okay.
Speaker 3:And they know 13 ways to cheat this County. You use method one, four and six. This County use 12, 13, 12,. You know 11, 12, and 13.
Speaker 3:They know how to do it. So there's one track that wants to go after each individual bucket that fraud happens. They want to close the loopholes on mail-in ballots or ballot harvesting or signature verification or you know all these mechanical issues, overwhelmed with the on the ground catching a judge in a voting booth put the button right that they completely ignore the potential for machine fraud. The machines are certified. All they're doing is counting and look, oh, they passed my audit right. The number matches what we reported. That group of people has very valid reasons to want to litigate, remove voter rolls, all of that. It matters big time.
Speaker 4:Yeah.
Speaker 3:Then there's another group that's like you guys are dumb, all that stuff. They're using the machine. They're using that cheat, those cheating methods, to backload what they're doing in the machines. They wouldn't need those cheating methods if they didn't. If they couldn't, you know, it would be easier to catch them. But every time you guys audit them it's like, oh, but the numbers add up and it all comes through this machine. You know they're cheating, but the numbers add up.
Speaker 4:How is that happening?
Speaker 3:huh, yeah so the machine people include people like mike lindell and patrick burn, but that those machine people went two directions. Mac lindell went one direction and Patrick Byrne went another direction. That creates an issue because what appears to me and and Steve Bannon called him out in live air you promoted a machine thing that ended up being wrong. They went down a pathway that when they did that symposium in Minnesota I don't know if you remember the Wisconsin there was a. That was where I think the poison pill was swallowed. They took something and went down that rabbit hole and it dead-ended them and I think it was placed there by operators to distract that entire group and discredit the machine people. But meanwhile you still had that foot patrol that we learned about on saturday. That was out there actually chasing down not only the machine and the code and the ip addresses but the actual people who are running them and recognizing this is. You know, you dea, dea guys are watching drugs, but you're actually watching an election fraud happening.
Speaker 3:The drugs are funding the election, the control this is about control power yeah, yeah, okay the drugs are just a means to an end, because as soon as they have control, we'll have no drugs on the planet. Watch, the only drugs that will be out there are the ones that kill you. Fentanyl, right, because they'll just they're calling the herd with it, end of story. That's what happens. I mean, they'll use it to destabilize you and then, as soon as they got power, they'll clean up the streets.
Speaker 3:Okay, so, said that, some of our favorite heroes in the conservative MAGA movement have taken different positions on this. We've talked about Scott Pressler, how his dad works in the I think it's the army and the psychological operations department. I don't know. Bill Barr's dad hired Jeffrey Epstein and then Bill Barr ended up kind of covering up for Jeffrey Epstein. I don't know, maybe there's some connections there, okay, so I bar ended up kind of covering up for jeffrey epstein.
Speaker 3:I don't know, maybe there's some connections there, okay, so I'm not, I'm not making any accusations against scott presser, but he's pretty adamant that it's not in the machines. Just get out and register people to vote. Uh, I'm a little bit more on the machine side, me too. Okay, so this is marjorie taylor or laura loomer reporting. Uh, basically about this story that we've been covering with the patrick burn stuff. The recent claims promoted by patrick burn at patrick burn, marjorie taylor, green, uh and other disinformation operatives about pre-filled ballots, venezuelan hackers stealing the election and cheat codes and dominion voting machines are calculated disinformation tactics aimed at forcing president trump into endorsing a false election fraud narrative or even having friendly trump ag, like at ken paxton, accused of engaging in legal activities like seizing voting machines.
Speaker 4:Okay.
Speaker 3:This is what you call an active measure. It's a full-blown operation to entrap Donald Trump and his supporters. These hostile active measures operations were part of a coordinated strategy deployed in 2020 against Donald Trump, pushing extreme recommendations as using the US Marshals to seize election equipment, just like the 2020 Italy gate, the Kraken, bethpage, ballot trafficking, qanon and other fabricated stories about foreign manufactured ballots or foreign controlled voting machines. But it is also designed to trap President Trump into taking drastic actions to discredit him and his supporters by labeling the recount process or national emergency and imposing threats of prosecution for foreign and domestic interference. This strategy is an active measure that seeks to frame Trump as an enemy of democracy and implicate him in unlawful behavior, utilizing people he's been told he can trust who are actually working against him, to push easily debunk theories, aka MTG.
Speaker 3:Mtg is one of the biggest offenders of pushing these false active measures and she's doing it on purpose to discredit Trump and to entrap him into making false statements. It's part of a broader agenda to discredit his legitimate claims of illegals voting in our elections, dead people voting, illegal ballot trafficking and unpurged voter rolls as a way to provoke potentially incriminating responses by Trump supporters, to reinforce the narrative that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy so that when he wins in November, the Democrats have an excuse to refuse to certify the election on January 6, 2025, and to accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist. Don't listen to MTG. Her post is factually incorrect. She has no evidence whatsoever and nobody has any evidence that the claims that she is making.
Speaker 7:And here's the post Someone posted up that when they went to vote in Whitfield County here in Georgia's 14th district. Now, remember, we're a swing state and we need everyone to vote in my district, and so they went to vote. We have the.
Speaker 7:Dominion machines and you mark, you go through and you mark president, you mark, you know, for Congress, that would be me. They mark Donald Trump and they marked who they were voting for the rest of the way down their ballot on the machine. Then, when they're finished, the machine prints their ballot a paper copy, a printed copy and each voter has to review that printed copy to make sure that it has selected the candidates that they want to vote for. And so when this voter printed their ballot and they looked, it had changed it was not Donald Trump, it was not me and it was not the other ones they had voted for. It had switched. And so they went up to one of the election workers and they said here's the problem. The machine switched it and the printed my printed ballot. I did not vote for these people. So they had to start over and they went through it several times and it kept on making the same error.
Speaker 3:OK, so here's the pattern 9, 9-11. There's no plane here at the pentagon. Oh hey, there was a plane. Do you have pictures? No, don't worry about it. Oh hey, the cocaine was over here by the library. Actually it was in this cubby, um, but we don't have anything else to tell you. Don't worry about it, okay. The election fraud, the election machines. Remember the cnn clips of way back when, when they're like, look at these election meetings and the Venezuelans showed up to help in Chicago the first time they used these machines. And why are the foreigners? Sequoia Capital this is like on the news normal. Lou Dobbs is like. This is extremely concerning. Democracy is for sale.
Speaker 4:You're gone, Lou.
Speaker 3:Lou, you're gone. Lou, Bring that up again, right? So, people who live this is my observation People who have their wagon hitched to an online world you make your money online. You make your money doing TV hits. You make your money basically selling your information and stuff through this ecosystem of online media influence. It's really good business to talk about the 13 ways of fraud. It's really good business because you can keep people spinning around and there's a there there but, then you never get the underlying problem right, the entire internet.
Speaker 3:The entire internet is an op. It's an operation. The entire internet is surveilled. There is no space on the internet where you have free speech. You don't. Everything is controlled some way somehow.
Speaker 3:If you are saying things on the internet and expressing your free speech and it is true and wild you either have no influence, you're either in a small little corner and they can just leave you alone, and if you do have influence, they'll come down on you and hammered what did I just show you? You want to expose a legit document showing that the CIA is engaged in torture? Oh, they're going to come down on you with the full weight of the federal government. It's not just about did you go viral or not? Or why am I getting so used? You know what I mean.
Speaker 3:You want to go protest an election and actually articulate how it is? Yeah, Show up at a protest and we'll go ahead and throw the book at you and treat you like you were a leader of a mob. We'll say in open court that if you didn't show up on January 6th, it might not have even happened, Right? That's the kind of nonsense they'll engage in. So I'm saying the people that don't have their bread buttered by the Internet that is completely controlled by numerous layers of psychological operations from foundations and actors and censorship through machines and state departments of different countries and ministries of peace and department of defense. I mean, there's so many layers, the whole internet's an op yeah, I was just thinking about what you just said there.
Speaker 4:You said if you didn't show up, january 6th wouldn't have happened, and I just thought, well, what if all of the people who were federally indicted never, never, were there and didn't have, you know, weren't, weren't there and they weren't offenders, and so it had just been another 1600 yeah, it would just been somebody else.
Speaker 3:Yeah, you're irrelevant. We're completely irrelevant in this story. Yeah, but keep in mind I want to make sure this is clear to people follow the money, follow the money always. Dominion has dominion. It has control. Everything's an op the cartels, the dod, the state department, the united states government, china, russia they're all all working together under some kind of UN Something's going on. There's factions in control.
Speaker 4:When you're talking about the money surrounding these voting machines, they'll always focus on things like the lawsuit with Fox News, and that'll be the value that'll be attached to these companies is numbers like that, you know, 27 million or something like that, but that's not the true value of these machines. The true value of these machines is the control.
Speaker 3:It's the control of the entire trillion dollars, the entire world, the entire, yes, the entire world.
Speaker 1:Entire world.
Speaker 3:Yes, this is how bankers control democracy.
Speaker 4:Yeah, and this is why this is one of the most important topics of our lifetime.
Speaker 3:Yes, and all roads lead to it. Important topics of our lifetime? Yes, and all roads lead to it. Yes, laura loomer, does she expose things? Does she vet things? Yes, but she needs to stay online. So I don't know if she's been threatened. I don't know if she's been psyoped, I don't know if she just was burned by getting too involved with mike lindell and that ended up being a bunk, and now she's sour on all of it. But I mean, here's an all. So laura loomer's like, don't even look at it. Here's the things you should focus on ballot harvesting mail, and you know what I mean. Yeah, but we're gonna have another vote. This is classic. What this is the republican party. I didn't believe the, the guy that was talking the other day, because he's like it's great, the democrats are going nuts, it's excellent. And then he slipped in. We've been able to fundraise like breaking records.
Speaker 3:Oh uh-huh great to be the loyal opposition to a crazy party. You love that they're taking our whites rights away because it fires us up and we'll donate, but you're doing nothing about our mail-in ballots.
Speaker 3:You're not even taking the surface level stuff in washington like, oh, we're gonna swap this election, you ain't doing shit? Yeah, exactly so. Here's the halderman report, which was held in a lawsuit for years, redacted and finally got released after it was too late to do anything. But this is, you know, some halderman up in university of michigan, and he here it is. You can just screenshot this anybody who wants to. But he goes and describes exactly how these machines are hacked right. Such cheating could not be detected by an rla or a hand count, since all the records of voters intent would be wrong. The only practical way to discover such an attack would be enough voters viewed their ballots, noticed the errors and alerted election officials, and election officials identify the problem. This is what margie taylor green is talking about it's.
Speaker 4:One of the first things I tried to do after the election was to try to see if I could audit my own ballot. And I couldn't. Can't do it, you can't do it.
Speaker 3:So I like la Loomer, but for me this is one of those things, cause I became aware of this because Patrick Byrne posted a post that said you know, based on what Laura's saying here, she can't be trusted. She's not trustworthy when it comes to this big issue. Sure, she'll chase cocaine down in the white house or track down some connection to some Epstein client or whatever, but when it comes to the big picture, her bread's buttered by the op. And we could, you know, listen? We're trying to make money online, we're trying to make this go to podcast, but I'm I am.
Speaker 3:I served freaking prison time over this stuff. You're not. I did it, I did it. I went to trial. I did. You know what I mean? I took me to go through the paces, get a whole jury. No plea deals for me. Right, because this I'm committed to you. The peasants I am a peasant. When I look around me, I see peasants Okay, I don't. I see people that are only as good as the information they have. I don't see people. I love reasonable debate with people that have developed opinions, but everything's an op. Most of what you know, as far as the mainstream narrative, is not not accurate to say the least.
Speaker 3:In some cases it's completely false, fictional and fabricated. How deep does the rabbit hole go? I don't know. Is it really worth talking about the merits of the moon landing? I don't have to go that deep. Look, this guy exposed spying. He gets attacked by the government. My roommate trash posts, my cellmate in prison trash posts online. Fbi entraps him saying he's a russian spy. I go to a protest to protest the election because I think a coup's happening. They tell me I'm the one trying to perpetuate the coup right everything seems to be fake.
Speaker 3:They tell me that there's no plane at the way at the pentagon, but then a couple minutes later there is. Then, when the video is released, it looks like a freaking tomahawk missile, doesn't look like a 747, but one video that got foiled by judicial watch. That every year on 9-11 they post like hello building seven doesn't make any sense to me. My friends went off and died because of a terrorist attack, but nobody can competently explain why a third tower went down in new york. That happened to be where the cia or and the fbi had or, excuse me, the fbi and the secret service, not the cia secret service had offices and documents and evidence. And bongino goes. The only time I've ever seen evidence disappear was building seven and nine eleven. But then he moves on.
Speaker 3:Isn't it odd that the accounting department at the Pentagon got hit and it was just one day prior that Rumsfeld said we're missing a trillion bucks, yeah. And then the Patriot Act gets passed and according to Katherine Austin Fitz in her interview with Tucker Carlson, she says the Patriot Act basically was enabling them to move money without accountability for defense purposes. And that's how you swell from one trillion dollars to 21 trillion dollars. In the last they added a trillion dollars a year. We're 36 trillion dollars in debt and 21 trillion of it, we know, ran through the pentagon and there's no accountability for it. So 36 minus 21, we're actually only 15 trillion in debt, folks and I thought jay ensley's uh nigerian scam was bad.
Speaker 3:Oh my god yeah, our literally nigerian scammers took covid money from the state of washington 500 million dollars nigerian scammers, and they're just can we get another grant? Man there's so much stuff, so much stuff. Okay, we're going to go ahead and we're going to wrap up. We got to wrap up. Okay so there was a. We're going to finish some of this content tomorrow. I've got some really amazing things as far as what they're doing with tech.
Speaker 4:Sometimes when you get a half smile on your face at the end of the show. I'm waiting for some kind of a funny video to pop this is a funny video okay there's, there's okay, here's the here's.
Speaker 3:There's two funny videos. So this is a funny video. This is just a little prank thing. A daughter to her dad, some college student, goes off to college and she's doing a little memorial day video for her father, who's a a veteran. Now, we're gonna love this. Okay, we're gonna love this. I can totally see I gave a talk in church about my grandfather. You know, it was like one of those honor your grandparents sure talks, and I was talking about how he met my grandmother, who's long since passed away, and my dad was a kid and stuff, and anyways, I got the stories wrong. They were very embellished and inaccurate. My grandpa came up to me afterwards like I don't know, I didn't realize your grandpa, jim, was like that. So this has a ring of for the grandfather some plausibility.
Speaker 15:Here we go. Hi, my name is Brista Miller, I'm a freshman at Texas A&M University and this is my grandpa. We're applying for the scholarship that's awarded to family members of veterans. This is my grandpa. He was in the military for over 50 years. He fought in World War II as well as World War I. During that time he did lose his eyesight, so he is not blind. He can see kind of like light, but he can't see anything else. He also lost both of his legs in the war.
Speaker 2:That's what he dog for veterans.
Speaker 15:I got better, I want to give a really big thank you to Biden for offering this scholarship, as both me and my grandpa are both very strong Democrats and we both voted for you in the last election. We really love you. Since retiring from the Army, he has started many banning gun campaigns in support of Biden and Harris's policies. My grandpa also raises me.
Speaker 4:She's just trying to break him. Wow, he pulled tough, no.
Speaker 3:I lost both my legs. It wasn't 50 years. Yeah, it wasn't world war one and world war two. He's like dude looks like he's maybe 60 yeah, he's like world war one and world war two.
Speaker 4:He's lost his eyesight he's like uh looking around.
Speaker 3:I voted for you, no okay, so in a in an insane clown world, all right, jake tapper did another a little uh podcast interview and he was talking about another podcast, oh boy, and I found this really funny. These are these moments of. They have clarity. These people aren't dumb, they're just manipulative.
Speaker 3:They're bought in. That makes sense. Like you can have a difference of opinion, like I can honestly see why someone would think collectivism is good. Certain, you know family values, the strength of their community, they can, they can say, you know collectivism is the way to go. Ok, there's a debate there, there's an open discussion. But when you get to where Jake Tapper's going to see here, you realize that they've lost the plot. And for someone like Jake Tapper, this has got to be so destabilizing. You've just lost the plot. I do feel this way sometimes when I talk about people on our side of the aisle where they're like so far right, they've basically look like our adversary you know what I mean.
Speaker 3:Like I, mean you got that combat boot on your right foot laced up real tight. You know, I mean the left foot. You got a slipper on. You know, like you don't care about what I do with my taxes, but you really want to regulate my morality with that right wing. You got a lot of molly gear. Yeah, exactly, the point is is it comes from the extremes, but he's seeing his own extremes and what?
Speaker 14:what is essentially mainstream I went on a left-leaning podcast that shall remain nameless and we were talking about my kids, because I think they were both people without kids and they asked me about my son and I said he was, you know, he's, he's a football player and he wants to be a policeman. And their joke was about my 15 year old son. Oh, how does he feel about minorities? Like the idea that he wants to be a policeman. Therefore, he's, he's racist. I saw and, like you know, that was the big laugh and then I got dragged in the comments and all that stuff and uh, and I thought to myself this is why you fuckers are losing elections A hundred percent.
Speaker 14:Like my football playing son who, uh, has no political views, he's 15. He thinks about world war two and gaming and playing linebacker. That's, that's his world. You're deciding he's a racist because he wants to be a cop. And why does he want to be a cop? He wants to be a cop because he wants to help people, you know, and he thinks that's the best way he can help people. And that's how the Democratic Party talks to men, not just white men, but men. And I mean, I get the idea that they thought Tim Walz could what's the term? He used code switch or something he thought that he could. He could translate the Democratic Party values because he hunts and fishes and owns a gun and was in the army and drinks a beer. That's what you're doing.
Speaker 14:I mean at least there was an attempt, but I find it just insane.
Speaker 4:Okay.
Speaker 3:He's not going to change anything. He's not going to change anything.
Speaker 4:It's just a moment of clarity where it's like no, this is not even a no, taylor, this is not even a moment of clarity. This is no taylor. This is not even a moment of clarity. This is him gaslighting the hell out of everybody, trying to pretend like he's somehow identifying with you because look at my son and how I'm. I'm so much like you because I have a son and and he's impacted just like you guys and these damn democrats just don't get it.
Speaker 3:It's like, dude, you've been holding their water for the last decade, easy yeah, and all of a sudden I don't hold water for the last decade.
Speaker 4:Easy, yeah, I don't hold water for white supremacists and all of a sudden, though, Nazis, he's like oh, these damn Democrats, oh my man, it's just a moment of clarity, right, but until he gets an agenda again, until his bread's being buttered again.
Speaker 3:Yeah, no, there's no. It's like. It's like what Mark Victor Hansen said.
Speaker 4:like it's like what mark victor hansen said you're speaking truth to impotence. It's just super disingenuous. Yep, you're speaking coming from him.
Speaker 3:All right, tomorrow's show we are going to go deep. Tomorrow's show is going to be awesome. You're definitely going to want to get there. We're going to hit with some katharine austin fits. We're going to talk about, you know, the world ending. We're going to talk about some incredible stuff. So join us tomorrow. Don't forget to visit peasantsPerspectivecom. And please go check out 1776liveus. You can see it in the show notes down below. We've got some amazing classes going on. The community's growing. We really love it. So please go check that out and reach out to me if you have any questions about it. And with that, don't forget to visit LeftBehindWithoutorg. We'll talk to you again.
Speaker 6:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 6:Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress there.
Speaker 6:Here's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 6:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would, please, please, good people.
Speaker 6:I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Speaker 6:We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king.
Speaker 6:Then the lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just cuz some watery tart through a sword at you. Shut up. Oh. But if I went round saying I was an emperor. Just because some moistened bink and loved a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, will you shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
