Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Bitcoin, Borderlands, and the Battle for Freedom
The powerful metaphor of peasants versus rulers frames our entire understanding of global politics in this eye-opening episode. We break down the Ukraine-Russia conflict beyond mainstream narratives, exploring how this seemingly distant conflict impacts everyday Americans.
The historical relationship between Ukraine and Russia resembles that of siblings with a complicated past. Ukraine—literally meaning "the borderland"—has always existed in Russia's shadow, with a significant Russian-speaking population that voted to rejoin Russia in 2014. This triggered what many don't recognize as essentially a civil war, followed by Putin's annexation of Crimea—Russia's only warm water port. While tensions froze during Trump's presidency, they've dramatically escalated under Biden.
We dive deep into troubling allegations of corruption connecting Ukrainian gas company Burisma, the Biden family, and what appears to be an elaborate money-laundering operation through a nationalized Ukrainian bank. These connections paint a different picture of why certain global interests seem determined to escalate this conflict regardless of human cost.
Current developments raise serious alarms about potential escalation toward direct US-Russia conflict. A recent Ukrainian operation that destroyed 42 Russian nuclear bombers represents a massive provocation that's barely being discussed in mainstream media. Meanwhile, European leaders are openly preparing for war while Americans remain largely uninformed about these developments.
The conversation shifts to domestic concerns with JD Vance offering a refreshing perspective on Bitcoin as a tool for financial freedom in an increasingly controlled economy. We also examine the border security crisis through Tom Holman's sobering assessment that millions of undocumented border crossers represent "the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever seen."
Join us as we cut through political noise to understand how these complex global issues affect regular citizens—the modern peasants who ultimately bear the consequences of elite decisions. Make sure to subscribe, share your thoughts in the comments, and visit our website for more unfiltered analysis of today's most pressing issues.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.
Speaker 3:We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people.
Speaker 3:Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Perspective. Are we good? Yes, of course we are. What are you talking about? I'm not checking, I'm just that whole part of the show in the morning. Ok, crazy stuff is going on everyday. Crazy stuff is going on, no, no, so, uh, this warn ukraine thing. It's really getting under my skin. So steve bannon uh has been talking about. So just recap, right, so Ukraine used to be part of the Soviet Union, yeah, and Ukraine, historically, has always had this very weird relationship with the motherland of Russia.
Speaker 6:Yeah, it's a separate, like a love hate relationship.
Speaker 3:Well they're clearly like, of the same ethnicity, ethnic group, religion, historically OK. But Ukraine, I think it means like the outer land or something, the borderland or something like that. It's the out there, ok, when, when you're Moscow's the center of the universe or Petersburg or whatever. And so Ukraine was also very oppressed under the Soviet Union. That's where the the Holdemore famine was, where they were basically taking all the grain up to russia and starving 20 million ukrainians, so a huge issue there.
Speaker 3:so ukraine and russia again have this weird like it's us in canada okay, that fair enough, starts in canada, so they're like the hinterland in the long arc of history, like, if you remember canada, america, us colonies or british colonies uh, constitutional convention, canada's part of it, they're part of that. And then, when it comes time to form the union, they're like now, we're out. If I forgot about that part, yes, so they're like no, no, we're out, we're staying with the Commonwealth. Okay, you know. So in the long arc, right Say, a couple hundred years from now, canada might be part of whatever our country is you know what.
Speaker 3:I'm saying so. It's like that's what Ukraine is. It's like part of, not part of, part of not part of. That's the, that's the relationship. But we're cousins like I got no hate for someone up in calgary, you know? No, definitely not texas of the north. You know what? I'm saying I love it. I love it. Okay, saskatchewan, that's kansas.
Speaker 6:I know what's going on here that's michigan, I get it okay, so you know, vancouver, that's seattle it's all here, right, texas of the north so you know, same same type of relationship.
Speaker 3:Okay as far as the people are concerned, but they're not going to be like there's no chance they're coming together. But half of ukraine, or a portion of ukraine, speaks russian okay, as opposed to the ukrainian dialect of just like canada, half of them speak french freaking weirdos not my cousins, I don't know what's going on there. Partly go home okay, so anyways, yes, exactly, or like new mexico you know, I mean it's like I don't know, okay so.
Speaker 3:Or north florida like I'm good with north florida, you get far south, I don't know, man, give it to cuba, okay, so. So ukraine and ukraine and russia half of you, crush, half of a portion of ukraine that speaks russian. Years ago and I don't remember exactly when, but they voted to basically re-associate with russia. Okay, okay, so. This created a like they want to be re-annexed into russia, and I believe that's the crimean peninsula, which would be russia's only port in a warm water port, correct? Other ports are all frozen in the winter and they're ice breakers and it's a big pain in the butt. Yeah, so that's a big deal, and that's that. That historically goes back to catherine the great, who originally, I think, took that space and declared it as part of mother russia I think one of the original reasons that people were speculating on the whole russian invasion was because of the port.
Speaker 6:You know they would have a warm water port. It was a huge thing.
Speaker 3:Well, they already had it. That's the thing like. This is the I know, but allowed him to take, I know, but he wanted control so here's what happened there.
Speaker 3:As soon as that vote happened, then ukraine essentially went into civil war. So now ukraine is launching bullets and, you know, mortars into the russian speaking portion of ukraine because they're trying to eliminate the russian speakers. What was the time frame on that? This is like 2014, okay, okay. So then russia that's why russia annexes ukraine and comes in under obama, because now he's defending people who have democratically voted to join russia, right, and speak russian. So now he's stepping in to defend the cousins that are coming back into the family or whatever.
Speaker 3:Okay, so this is a. This is what's going on, okay, well, that then leads to even more conflict, which then under trump everything kind of freezes. However, ukraine, to my knowledge, through the azaroff battalion, is still kind of on the offensive, doing guerrilla type stuff, you know, the whole time. So then biden gets in and putin's like this has got to stop, because the dnc, the democrat national committee, the soros foundation and other corrupt politicians from around the world are running ukraine like a puppet state okay, I mean, I can actually believe that okay, so he's like this has got to stop.
Speaker 3:So at that point, that's where he expands his incursion to take more territory. But all this territory that he's taken is this predominantly russian speaking portion of ukraine. Okay, okay, but this would give him at full access to that port. Ok, ok, not just the one side, like the both sides. That's what it looks like. I don't believe from anything, anything other than the rhetoric that you hear from people like Lindsey Graham, that Russia is trying to take all of Ukraine. I don't think they want to be an occupying force. They don't intend to move into Poland. A lot of this is the biden administration has been marching on this order that ukraine will be part of nato, and this goes back like 15 years, and this has been putin's like. You know why is putin not assimilating with europe?
Speaker 3:because of that right, that's just one of his hardline topics that goes back a long time, yeah, and so remember, putin's been around for what? Four of our presidents, yeah, and he's watching them with a waffle, with a waffle on their sentiments towards russia, right, right. And so at this point he's like now, nato's my enemy, because nato's the thing that's actually consistent. Yeah, in this whole whole deal here, all you democracies are constantly changing over, but nato is the policymaker, that's your military arm. So if nato, if ukraine, becomes nato, you're putting missiles on my border and that's a problem for me, because this country is at war with crimea. Do you see what I'm saying?
Speaker 3:yeah so this is like he's trying to deter a chess move. That's still multiple moves away that the American people were just like I got to go to work today, susan's going to talk to me at the water cooler, so that's what. That's why this has been going on. Biden comes in the NATO things now on the table because if NATO takes over Ukraine, oh how great would that be. Because if nato takes over ukraine, oh how great would that be.
Speaker 3:Think about all the money you can funnel into defense systems and programs and contractors and gas contracts and all that stuff. We're a country that every single important board, every single important permit and license has all been corrupted. You know what I mean when we follow. You know they're not you have to go to the wayback machine to get them but the old, old episodes which someday I'm going to go grab and upload a season one. But if you go, look at that. When we were going over the ukrainian scandal with joe biden and privot bank and and burisma and how all that played out. I mean they took, they took, they got someone's seat that the guy that was running Burisma was the one who issued permits for National Gas, so of course, naturally, he issued his company the permits he needed, not the monopoly on the permits.
Speaker 3:And then they got a new president in. I think it was Poroshenko, I can't remember. There's two presidents and I swapped their names, the old one and the new one. The old one had to go into exile. The new comes in and he's the one calling joe biden and joe biden's like, hey, we gotta do this thing with the bank. And uh, yeah, get that done.
Speaker 3:And what they're doing is they're taking a private bank, like you know your local wells fargo. I mean, this is a bad example because these are practically nationalized banks now. But you know your local regional bank, but it's a. It's a big bank. You know ukraine's only one state, and so they're taking pre-vought bank and they're taking it from private to nationalized. So they're socializing the bank, making it the public bank. So now it's the bank of ukraine, and then they're able to run the burisma money through pre-vought bank, which is now not subject to accounting regulations and public oversight because you don't get to audit the government, and that's where the grift happens.
Speaker 3:Huh, okay, so that's what they were setting up joe biden, directly with his family. And that's why hunter was on the board of burisma, because he guaranteed burisma's tied into all this, this other deal. Do you see what I'm saying. It's corrupt and you've got the president of ukraine selling out the banking system by using the power of the state to nationalize a bank, to take it over in order to absorb the books, to launder money from the gas company. Like you know, putin's not dumb. The president's figured it out. You know what?
Speaker 3:I'm saying so it's like? I don't think so. And then on top of that, he is seeing real tangible threats, things like the bio labs in Ukraine. It's a CIA outpost. I think someone was on the war room yesterday saying there's nine or 16 CIA bases in Ukraine. Whoa, ok. So on the verge of peace talks, trump's trying to use a stick to swat these guys into compliance. Here, come to some type of settlement, get the bolts to stop flying. Seems like we're getting pretty close.
Speaker 6:Every time he talks.
Speaker 3:Well, every time he talks about, he reframes it to just 5000 people a day or die. It's very oh yeah. For what? What it was, I don't care who has Crimea Right.
Speaker 2:Doesn't make a difference to me. I don't care who has Crimea.
Speaker 3:Right, doesn't make a difference to me. You know what I mean. I don't. I don't know. Yeah, no one's ever connected Ukraine to my dinner table. I don't know how, how it affects me, just like Burma. I don't really know what's going on in Burma, doesn't matter to me. You know what I mean, but sure Heck matters what's sure heck matters what's going on locally. So anyways, um so then, most recently, as these peace talks are amping up, uh, putin went to go visit some of this disputed. So at one point, in order to go on the offensive, ukraine pushed into some russian territory. A sliver, you know little little piece and uh.
Speaker 3:So putin was flying down towards the front line or something like that, some kind of just go check stuff out in his helicopter, flying in luxury, and it came under drone attack. So that was a huge escalation, so that's. And then trump came out and goes. Putin's acting crazy. Apparently wasn't briefed or told about the assassination attempt on putin. So when putin was launching missiles into Kiev in retaliation, trump was like he's going crazy. We're supposed to be going to peace talks and he's launching missiles. That's all in the news.
Speaker 6:You'd be launching missiles too, if somebody was shooting at you.
Speaker 3:Now it's like oh, so Trump doesn't know what the peasants do, so Trump needs to get his cell phone back. Yeah, because clearly the National Security Administration, which has been cleaned out. Right, but someone is not telling Donald Trump Somebody's not briefing him properly.
Speaker 3:That's on Twitter. That's turning out to be true. You know what I mean. Like I understand fog of war, but you'd think the president would have a heads up as to if there's an assassination attempt on Putin, the president would have a heads up as to if there's an assassination attempt on and then, uh, now, right before these peace talks that were in turkey yesterday, two days, yeah, yesterday, they were supposed to meet putin and zelensky.
Speaker 3:Well, they didn't meet low-level diplomats to go meet for 30 minutes because zelenski, on an 18-month operation, sent all those trucks deep into russia, launched the drones and took out 42 nuclear bombers okay which are which, by treaty, have to be out in the open. Our bombers are out in the open too, their nuclear cable. They're supposed to be not in a hangar or not underground it's like a treaty.
Speaker 3:Okay, okay, so they were honoring that okay, and and that happened took 18 months to plant, so clearly this would have probably started under joe biden. So people are backing up all the public reporting on this and when it was authorized and this is right about when the auto pin presidency is really alleged to have been kicked off okay, so who authorized this? So you go back to see jake sullivan and other people making quotes about the gloves are off and deep into territory and is biden still alive so now?
Speaker 3:yeah, so now trump is. The white House is publicly claiming that they were not informed of this attack.
Speaker 6:Which is possible, okay.
Speaker 3:Ukraine's not capable of doing this attack without US or Western assistance. Satellite GPS capability, drone technology, all this kind of stuff they're not capable of pulling it off without our help.
Speaker 3:Starts to make a citizen wonder so now you've got starmer up in england who's like get ready for war, we're gonna mobilize. We're getting ready for war, we're getting on war footing. You've got the german uh merits their prime minister, president, whatever he is, emperor, he is like also signaling a lot of the same things, saying that now they're authorizing ukraine to act so they're beating the war drum yes, in europe so steve bannon makes some really good points about this okay he says we're being sucked into this war.
Speaker 3:On a monday afternoon president trump tweeted out you know, just got off the phone with all the top generals Our military is bigger, better and stronger than ever. We're replenishing our stockpiles more than ever before, levels greater than ever seen. Hopefully we'll never have to use them On a Monday afternoon. You know he just tweeted that, so you can see the escalatory ladder that's being climbed.
Speaker 3:So Steve bannon makes this point we're being sucked into this because russia has a very clear doctrine and they publish it and they follow it really strictly. Right, they don't want to be seen as the guys who don't follow the rules, because that's, you know, kind of what the communists did. So, believe it or not, they kind of have their own set of ethos as a nation in repulsion to what they went through. Can't discount that right. So they want well-published things. You know what I mean clear sets of rules, law and order to the hilt. You know what I'm saying. Like so they, they have surrendered a lot of freedom domestically for liberty and as a nation state they're doing fairly well, like if you, you know, take out the tyranny and all that kind of stuff, like just accept that as a de facto state. You know they're doing well.
Speaker 3:I spoke to someone who just recently spent years three years in Moscow, said streets are clean, everybody's walking around happy. Now they all know they're being spied on and if you do something wrong you're going to get picked up instantly. It's a surveillance state, but that's what makes it so nice and clean and happy If you're just going about your business. Just think America with ice Functioning Exactly so. But that's why there's no drug dealers on the streets and there's not homeless. You know they don't have a drug.
Speaker 6:But that's how Russia would look at America. You know they'd look at us the same way we look at them.
Speaker 3:Yeah, yeah. So point is, we're very more permissive, clearly. So we err on the side of liberty, to a fault at least we societally do, all the way to the point that we embrace some of the craziest nonsense on the planet. So so the the war, you know? Um, so the war drum like, okay, putin's rational. So last he put, they changed their. That was two years ago. They changed their war doctrine where they said in order to escalate up the ladder to the nuclear launch, right, these are the steps. And one of the things on there was, it said that if any attack inside of Russia happens by a proxy with another nuclear ally, so essentially you know like you can't use a proxy. If the proxy comes in and it's a, it's a domestic attack, like we're going to consider big brother a joy, it'll be a joint attack. So this right now is viewed by russia as the opening salvo, kinetically, between the united states and russia. This is beyond disputed borderland. Does that make sense?
Speaker 3:this is yeah and you came for the nuclear bombers and they published this and we know this and this is not not on anybody's radar. So now russia's sitting back going. You just didn't go up the ladder a step, you just went 50 the ladder. So what happens is you climb this ladder, the toll gets greater and greater and greater. The numbers are staggering. On the desk I heard 1.5 million Russian and Ukrainians combined, and on the Ukrainian side there's a lot of citizens involved.
Speaker 3:So Steve Bannon makes the point that this stuff, when you start talking about war, when you're selling, we, the people, the peasants, the people who have to go pay the price you always have this moral reasoning and rational. That starts to become very real. And then it starts to become really personal, because you're missing Timmy, your brother, and you're missing. You know your grandma got hit in that bombing and dad died, and you know what I mean hitting that bombing and dad died, and you know what I mean. And all of a sudden there's a blood lust of vengeance and it becomes political because it's the parents and the grandparents and the left behinds that vote and have. You know the capability to riot and things like that. They have some power. The people do right. Every ruler knows this. He lives in fear of the peasant revolt, right. So now this thing takes on a whole different life because it's about justice and vengeance and settling a score and it becomes and for the leaders it becomes life preservation.
Speaker 3:You think zelensky is just going to cruise around kiev like a rock star after this at all? He suspended elections, he put journalists in jail, he put politicians in jail, you know. I mean, they've had, they've been pulling people off the street to go be fodder on the front lines. You think you think he's going to be able to just live his rock star life when this is over?
Speaker 3:no you think he's just going to walk away oh yeah, he will walk away live the rest of his life in exile somewhere. I mean, the last two presidents are living in exile yeah, he will be in exile, so you know and oh, by the way, he owns 24 acres down in palm beach. So he'll be our bosom buddy after this, I'm sure, and he'll be rich, but maybe or he'll be qaddafi'd, I mean, that's the other that could be you're in deep with doing the patsy work of the worldwide deep state and guess how you end up.
Speaker 3:Go ask the uh leader vietnam, when we left, you know. Go ask. Go ask us saddam hussein how it was doing business with the us in the 70s and 80s, you know. Go ask qaddafi, you know what what how he feels about his relationship with the cia and when he finally got found religion and decided to become a populist. You know how did that turn out for you. So you know, zielinski's not a dummy. I mean, he's flipping a coin if he survives at all, but it's definitely not going to be the life he has now no for sure.
Speaker 6:I mean, I just assumed that he would bail out of the country if everything went sideways and he's got a pile of money somewhere we're getting sucked into this thing and the thing is, this is tied in with so many.
Speaker 3:We talk about all the big interests of money. This is very real, right, the money left the united states, and because? Why? Money wants security? It wants guarantees. So how does it get that? A control state where controls the currency, every transaction, transaction, complete trends, trends, you know, visibility into your transactions. Of course, we'll have no visibility into theirs, right, china is the perfect state for a controlled currency, for, for, for that kind of stuff, because you know the ledger will always balance, because they'll make sure it balances balances like.
Speaker 3:So you've got these big polls that we have to fight against, like the the light of liberty, especially for our listeners. We have we have, you know, a really small niche audience which I really appreciate. Show the show, okay, but I know that everyone is a liberty lover, like that's why you're attracted to this show. But we have to recognize, like we've got to go out and help other people see the bigger picture. Right, our political climate right now, where we're at geopolitically in the world stage. This future is being fought with names Putin, she, trump, starmer, you know, you've got names. These are. When you look at world history. This is how nation states they take on the persona of their leader who, in theory, embodies the people. Donald Trump embodies the American spirit.
Speaker 6:Despite Trump's best efforts to bring peace in this region, it seems, like you know, from my perspective it seems like the deep state of the joe biden slash forever era has, you know, been doing some dirty work behind the scenes to undermine all of the peace talks and and it's their fault that we're getting sucked into this war. This has to do and I'm just wondering if the is there something that trump can do, some olive branch that he can do for putin to to ease this, especially this attack on his bombers, because that is really huge that's a good question, and I don't know okay I don't know what can or can't be done.
Speaker 3:I mean mean, if it was you and me having a conflict, I'd be like hey, ron, I'm so sorry bro.
Speaker 6:Hey, I'd be like hey, do you want like a half a dozen of our bombers to borrow? You want to? Borrow. I mean, seriously, do you want to just borrow half of our bombers just to hang out, you know? Just so you have some parody, yeah. No, so that's the.
Speaker 3:That's the kind of thing that would be a radical change. And if it, yeah, maybe I don't know why not.
Speaker 6:Because now, because right now, he's going to be feeling like the parody is really askew.
Speaker 3:And the thing is, here's my big question on that is is there really parody, like like in a nuclear age? There's not. I mean, are you really going gonna contemplate invading pakistan?
Speaker 6:no, there's not really parody, but the, it's just the olive branch like hey, let's, let's try to work this out.
Speaker 3:You know I think that's kind of how I feel how insignificant the squabble is. Like the nuclear age. Okay, there's always nuance in everything and there's a. There's a phrase in Atlas shrug that says if, if there's a contradiction, check your premise right. So oftentimes there's things that we look at that are like a dichotomy. It looks like there's a yin and yang and a polar opposite and that's a contradiction. So if that's the case, you got to check, check your premise right. So the premise that I'm checking here is that that you can have the yang without the yang, that you can have the is without the is not. We define what is by what it is not. So you can't have what is unless you have everything it is not. Simultaneously, opposites must exist, right. So the. The premise is, when you see the opposite and you see the contradiction, to see that it's not really a contradiction. You're just not looking at it as a whole.
Speaker 3:So from a biblical worldview, which in the West we generally have, it's premised on law and order, man's dominion over the earth. These are the things that are big picture biblical worldview the value of the individual and things like that. These are the things that are big picture biblical worldview, the value of the individual and things like that. It's juxtaposed within the Bible with the tribe, the family, you know, the church there's different euphemisms for whatever political or Well, there's the family of God, which is the, the organizations that exist. This would be your very localized family and tribe. This would be your very localized family and tribe.
Speaker 3:And then you've got political organizations which are referred to from various phrases, from church to church, to nation, to country, to religion. It kind of expands well beyond just your family and your very small tribe. That's god's political structure. Then you've got the man's political structure. Man's political structure is supposed to reinforce god's political structure. That's the way we believe it to be and that's the way our founding fathers kind of set things up. However to be, and that's the way our founding fathers kind of set things up. However, I'm trying not to screw our videos today, okay, yeah, so the contradiction here is you've got the bigger picture of the political organizations and the tribe, which overlap, okay, and then you've got your family and your individualness, and there's the two things. So you can't be all individual because the individual is part of the collective and you identify the individual out of the collective. So the individual is part of the collective in order to be an individual in the first place. Do you see the yin and the yang? So that's the check, your premise.
Speaker 3:I don't know, Maybe maybe it's so early, okay. Premise, I don't know, maybe maybe it's so early, okay. Point is in the bible. In the bible I would look at, I said god intends to bring an end to the nation state. He intends a one world government where he is the government, okay. So the problem is, you've got people who hijack things. So this is the chieftains, right, who's who's? One job becomes management, and these are the bureaucrats, these are the second handers, these are the people that start to run things and they they become.
Speaker 3:At first it might be patriarchal, but then it becomes cynical, right, like I have to be in charge of you because you can't be in charge of yourself. Oh, look, how dumb you are. I haven't even educated you. Well, this is like when a parent looks at their kid in judgment. It's like, well, you raised them, you. Well. This is like when a parent looks at their kid in judgment. It's like, well, you raised them. You know what I mean. You know teacher meets student. You know what I mean. So, anyways, that's they.
Speaker 3:They get into this mode where they want to manage the Karls Marx people who wanted to look at government. And we have the solution. Right, I look at it and I go, I have the solution. Right, I look at it and I go, I have the solution. The solution is do nothing right, let it happen and all of a sudden, these incredibly powerful hands called market forces and supply and demand and survival instinct and mating, you know rituals, and all this stuff will work itself out, right, right. So that's my big thing Get rid of the nation state and do nothing.
Speaker 6:Somehow it always reaches homeostasis yeah.
Speaker 3:That's the libertarian utopia view, but can't get there. All right, let's jump into some videos. Speaking of libertarian views, let's talk about money. I think this is OK. Think this is okay. Jd vance and donald trump, and specifically donald trump and the people that are aligned with his agenda, are uniquely capable of telling the truth okay. They're uniquely capable of calling a spade a spade, saying what makes total common sense, and they adopt what's real sometimes to a fault sometimes to a fault.
Speaker 3:Yes, sometimes to a fault. Uh, donald trump is a salesman. He's the chief magician, don't forget that. Yeah, and he's definitely out there selling things like stockpile ammunition at levels never before seen. You know, it's like what? To find? Levels before, never before seen. Are we at world war ii levels don't ask for details never seen in my administration or never seen this week. You know what I mean. It's kind of like the restaurants, to say the greatest restaurant in the state or something, and it's like right, you know what I'm saying. Same thing donald trump is guilty of hyperbolic rhetoric, but he's not guilty of lying about the things. You know what I'm saying? Yeah, okay, so so jd vance, it seems to be cut from that cloth.
Speaker 3:I read the book hillbilly elegy. You can hear him in that book and you can see the background, where he came from, and it's like as just I'm just thank goodness that this is our vice president, because this is a guy who understands the people, like his trajectory on where he's at is meteoric and it's special and it comes from the belief. At some point someone told him you can do anything you want in this world. You know what I mean. Like coming from where you came from. Like, instead of using it to be a victim, use it to be a tool. But he it's part of who he is. I love this about him.
Speaker 3:So when he talks about this Bitcoin thing, what I really appreciate is he mentions gold and silver and making the comparison, because to me, anything shy of that is like the problem, because gold and silver are easy to see how the economic system works, but when people see Bitcoin as anything other than similar in competition to the financial system, it falls short. Right, it has to remain separate. So when he talks about that, I really appreciate it and I also really appreciate that he's changing the trajectory of our financial system, because our trajectory has been more and more tightening control and more and more of like CBDCs the digital banking, bitcoin for the central banks, and that would leave us nothing. I couldn't take cash and do anything right. Everything would be a government transaction. So the fact that they're talking about Bitcoin and pushing this is huge. Hold on.
Speaker 3:I can't believe we got this far into the show and I haven't played a video yet.
Speaker 6:I know what are we at, like minute 30?.
Speaker 3:I'm tired of listening to myself, geez. All right, let's take a break here. Let's listen to JD Vance.
Speaker 14:I think the core value proposition of cryptocurrency is that it's a way of transacting and a way of storing value in a digital age. Look, 100 years ago, if you wanted to go and buy something, you put a dollar bill on the table. You put a gold coin on the table. You know, you put a dollar bill on the table, you put a gold coin on the table. The value proposition of Bitcoin is that it can serve the same function, but in a digital age a way that's secure, that's safer from fraud, that allows people to buy and sell and store value, but in a way that's consistent with the modern technological age that we live in Now. Having said that, I fully accept there are risks to all of these things. There are always risks to new technologies.
Speaker 14:Our approach in the Trump administration is to say you know, let people innovate, let people figure this stuff out on their own. If the critics of Bitcoin are right I happen to think that they're wrong that will eventually win out in the marketplace. If the advocates of Bitcoin are right and I happen to agree with them if they make their case, that's eventually going to win out in the marketplace. What you shouldn't have is a dictatorial government that tells certain industries they're not allowed to do what they need to do. You've got to let people make these decisions on their own, and that's sort of been our approach. We want common sense regulatory regimes. We want to allow the cryptocurrency industry to participate in the mainstream of the economy, but then, ultimately, the laws of economics, the laws of supply and demand, are going to make the determinations from there.
Speaker 3:I think, does that seem reasoned and rationed? Yeah. He's such a good communicator. You know where he got his communication skills, where he honed them. So he was in the Marine Corps and he was in like the public relations unit and the captain that would be to like press conferences and stuff like that got caught up in some something and had to be quickly relieved of duty, so he had to step in. So he had to step in as a little lowly really for.
Speaker 3:Sergeant, sergeant, they're like hey, go do that press briefing. So he filled in in the role of a captain, which then allowed him because he's the pr guy, it allowed him to hobnob with generals, colonels, captains, lieutenants, as a little sergeant. It's kind of totally in this ad lib, ad hoc role that he he did a good job at right early, you know. But he did some things that were kind of early on, that were really bonehead, where he made some misstatements and caused like additional PR nightmare for the base or whatever. And anyways, but he was, you know, in the book he talks about being mentored by different people that helped him and for that year or whatever, he got to see, you know, and that's how he went to when he deployed.
Speaker 3:He was like a journalist, like a public relations person. So they do a campaign, you have to go talk about it. But that also, you know, he was not in the battle. He never claims any kind of valor of being shot at or anything. But you know you're talking to the soldiers who are coming back from the front lines that are all tore up and you see the back side of it. You know what I mean. Pretty interesting, oh, that's pretty cool. Uh, the other thing too. This came up. We're just gonna like shoot through these videos. These are kind of fun. Just rip them.
Speaker 3:Just we're just gonna go through these this, okay, politicians lie really now, anytime we do something like this, I reserve the right to be wrong. Okay, often wrong, never indict. We're only as good as the information we have. Okay, when you form an opinion, it's based on the information you have. This whole show is just based on talking about how I arrived at some opinion, or just look at adam schiff's face.
Speaker 6:Oh my gosh pencil neck shift.
Speaker 3:So this is adam schiff and joy reed. This is old, okay. So this is back when Trump was still in office, before he was leaving, and there was talk about pardoning his kids because, remember, there's been these ongoing investigations His kids were getting dragged in with subpoenas left and right. So there's talk of pardons.
Speaker 15:Have you ever heard of somebody getting a preemptive pardon who was innocent of all crime? Who's just an innocent person? Have you ever heard of that? Just somebody getting a blanket.
Speaker 4:But no, it's the president's own family. It's people that have been covering up for the president, in addition to his own family.
Speaker 2:Is there an innocent explanation for someone to seek preemptive pardons for family members?
Speaker 16:Would you do that if you knew you were innocent and just worried about outside forces? The answer to that is going to be no If you haven't done anything wrong, you sit there and go.
Speaker 7:what do you need a preemptive pardon for? If he pardons people preemptively, he's essentially telling the public that these people have committed crimes and we may not be aware of what they are.
Speaker 10:The pardon is clear evidence that crimes have been committed. I imagine if he decides to issue these preemptive parties, it will be cast in a way that he is protecting his family and protecting their reputation. This is a COVID guy From you know villainous exterior forces that are against him First off.
Speaker 12:We should just take a deep breath and acknowledge the audacity of a president who's so clearly concerned about his own criminal culpability and that of his family members that pardons are a major obsession with him his family members that pardons are a major obsession with him, the idea of a kind of prospective pardon, this sort of permanent federal get out of jail free card.
Speaker 7:That that seems to be what we're talking about in the case of this Right With Giuliani and his three eldest children who, as far as we know, don't have not been convicted of a crime. Maybe they've committed a lot and they don't want to face action. I don't know. It's weird. I wouldn't ask for a pardon. I don't think I deserve one because I don't think I've done anything criminal. But like, where does that come from, that concept that you can just kind of wave your magic pardon wand?
Speaker 9:Mimi Rogan is literally my gay in my town.
Speaker 4:There will be opportunities to prosecute these people regardless if they abuse the pardon power as they are thinking.
Speaker 6:Hopefully, ellie. There will be a skyfall on this entire crime family and there will be another day for them to die. The president of the Department of Justice, rudy Giuliani. 160,000 cases today.
Speaker 3:Cases MSNBC said the entire sky can fall in this crime family, referring to the trump family. Yeah, and they can die another day another day.
Speaker 6:I think that's like uh, would you see that?
Speaker 13:and I asked pete ferrara this question as essentially an admission of guilt I certainly would view it that way.
Speaker 4:I think millions of americans would view it that way if there was no belief in criminality, why would he think?
Speaker 6:it was necessary but you gotta back it up, president and pause. Just on their faces, look at him, oh my gosh the internet lives forever, why would you?
Speaker 3:need pardons why would you? Oh, I would absolutely believe it's wrong. Oh, you know what I didn't do this morning? I didn't oh no, start over boink national, because we got talking because yesterday I went to the republican national or not republican national convention.
Speaker 3:I went to uh, a gop meeting local and they were recommending and endorsing candidates they'd never met. It was pretty despicable. So this was, uh, we're talking about Harvard, right, and you know, these are the people that are going to literally run your world, okay, so this is, uh, what are we looking at here, ron? What can you see? What are we? What are we watching? Oh, geez, tell me, what are you looking at?
Speaker 6:um a fine young lady at a local university somewhere in america. I don't know more than that. Um well, there's a what. What was your high school gpa and sat score? What colors her skin? Um um brown, I don't know okay.
Speaker 3:So this is a cute lady, nice big hair, lots of pink, lots of pink. Beautiful woman, okay, uh, but check this out, she's at harvard. So these are, these are the best of us. I mean, this is our future leaders what was your high school?
Speaker 10:gpa and sap score like yeah, so I had a 4.68 gpa out of 5.0 I don't know what that means.
Speaker 3:4.68 I don't know what that means. I've heard of this 5.0 thing before. I don't know what that means I don't either.
Speaker 6:That's a lot of extra credit.
Speaker 3:I know it's a thing, I know it's a thing, like there's some way to get extra, like the a pluses or something like I don't know. I don't understand it. I lived in a 4.0 world, but I did too I don't know if this is like everybody gets a star, like we want everybody to have a 4.0, so it's between four and five. I don't know.
Speaker 10:I have no idea, I don't know either. No idea, and I went test, optional test optional.
Speaker 7:Yes, I see, I see, was there a reason why you went test optional?
Speaker 10:yeah. So before I applied to all my colleges, I made sure that my my test score fell in the range, or like the upper range of the school, and when I saw that my test score didn't fall in the upper range of harvard scores, I just decided not to submit it how about?
Speaker 16:what can I?
Speaker 4:okay, I didn't know you could do that dang, she's smart we've been doing it wrong.
Speaker 3:We've been trying to get into harvard. The key is not to try to get in, and then they love you. And oh, she went on to talk about her only or her extracurricular was she worked at ihop. And they're like oh, colleges love work. You know they love work experience. It was my only job. She worked at ihop, I worked at kfc when I was a person.
Speaker 6:She worked at IHOP. I worked at KFC when I was a kid.
Speaker 3:I'm a people person because I worked at IHOP. I'm like you know how many jobs I had by the time I went to college. And good jobs and like good resume jobs Like that's not what qualifies you to go to Harvard. Your IHOP position Like that's.
Speaker 6:With my resume, I should be able to get the Yale. I mean, come on.
Speaker 3:I wanted some extra money. Sweetie, if you're looking at Harvard, that extra money at IHOP, it's not the deal breaker. You know what I mean.
Speaker 6:I had no idea that. You know, my test scores were the toilet. I didn't know, I could just not submit them.
Speaker 3:Yeah, apparently it's like you know, probably had better odds. It'd be like oh, what a mystery. Apparently it's like you know, probably had better odds. It'd be like oh, what a mystery. This will add some diversity. Let's, let's let's drop some mediocrity right in the middle of harvard. Just see how this goes. It'd be funny, but that's you know. Meanwhile, out here in the real world, we're we're acting like this. Okay, this, this is how the real world works, all right.
Speaker 9:So now I've showed you the way we're supposed to do it every time. Now I'm going to show you the way we really do it. Safety is number one. Of course, we're behind schedule, and that's a little bit. Now, if you come in here every day and you work hard and you already can well all that's going to do is get you more work. Just remember, you didn't get out and run the bear, you just get out and run your buddy. More work than Rob. It ain't hard to do. You'll be okay. If you think you got a good idea and you want to share it with the boss, that's fine. Just make sure you do it with the boss. That's fine. Just make sure you do it with witnesses or it'll wind up being his good idea Last year we broke an all-time profit record, made the company millions on millions and we got a pizza party.
Speaker 9:We got a pizza party. Everybody had two slices. We're nice, we care about who you talk to. We have telephones and teleprompters and and we've got a Teletimmy. You tell Timmy you might as well be using a megaphone and tell everybody to plant. Be prepared for when the engineers come along and improve your job. They won't talk to you about it. They won't want any input from you, even though you do that job every day.
Speaker 6:They've improved my job to the point where it's miserable.
Speaker 9:Oh, that's great, to the point where it's miserable there's a little highlight hearted stuff.
Speaker 3:Okay, so this is actually steve bannon. This is what I was gonna kind of open the show with the same guy.
Speaker 6:Huh, same guy yeah, pretty much.
Speaker 3:So this is steve don't get there all right.
Speaker 14:So steve bannon jail a us senator because he's saying something you don't like.
Speaker 3:I don't understand going over to ukraine days before all this pops off going. We gotta. We gotta russia. Lindsey graham is saying things that are implying regime change in russia. We gotta take out putin. Keep in mind, there was just an assassination attempt on him.
Speaker 14:This is all getting really hairy I don't understand how you could want to jail a us senator because he's saying something you don't like, because he sounds like the worst of the deep state no, it's absolutely what he's doing.
Speaker 5:What he's doing over there right now is stirring it up. He's giving the Ukrainians, but it's not illegal. He's giving Ukrainians false hope. He's giving Ukrainians false hope that we're there to support them on engaging Russia in a kinetic conflict, and we are not President. Trump, maybe he's wrong President Trump?
Speaker 16:Hey, maybe he's wrong president trump hey, so maybe he's wrong, but what do you say for all?
Speaker 5:men jay, two things. Two things ought to happen. Either cancel his passport and don't lay back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back. Lindsey graham is stirring it up right now and people better wake up to the fact that we're getting sucked into this war I don't understand how you could want to jail a U S Senator this this Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 6:Hold on. I thought Cuomo was out. How come we're still listening to him? He's got his own show now.
Speaker 3:Uh great it's in our space. We tweet the show folks. We're way better than that.
Speaker 5:Yeah, here's more banning on Germany's here on Thursday After TAS said that they are targeting they're doing targeting exercises the Russian military in Berlin, and this before this weekend. This weekend, attack by the Ukrainians and counterattack by the Russians. I don't know what message that sends to BB. I don't know. Hey, we didn't know about it. Nobody gave us a heads up. Nobody gave us a heads up. Nobody gave us a heads up. I think the National Security Council has got to step in here. I don't know why Ratcliffe saying we're not getting rid of any CIA guys.
Speaker 3:Something's very, very, very wrong here. Germany's here on Thursday. Bannon has been. Sometimes I wonder Bannon in in his show, the war room, so you can't understand the mega movement without pairing in steve bannon.
Speaker 3:He was trump's 2016 campaign president or manager or whatever it was, and then during the trump impeachment the first one he started this podcast war room, which has now become one of the largest shows in the country. Okay, and so he is a. He's a drum beater. He's constantly keeping his listeners kind of on the front line. Lots of calls to action, like if he says, call your Senator, the people that listen to his show every day are calling their Senator. So he's got. He's really able to mobilize the MAGA movement and create that substance behind the Trump agenda. You know, he's the one where Trump says a tweet and Bannon spends four hours explaining everything around it. So Bannon's a great source for stuff and he also knows the backside of the thing. He went to prison, you know, because he stood up to Nancy Pelosi. So he's becoming one of those people. That's absolutely got. You know some notches. I mean he's been deployed. He's kind of done a lot of this stuff and uh, so when he's saying something's not right, like you know, he understands the swamp.
Speaker 3:They're not briefing trump correctly. There's been criticism by susan rice that trump's not taking the briefings. Well, if you can't trust the briefing giver, are you sucking us into a war? Well, now have you weaponized the fact that I'm not being briefed to make me look stupid, or is this part of your 5D chess? We don't know. I mean, this is just one of those things where all we can do is sit back and watch, but get some Bitcoin and figure out how to be self-sufficient and get a year's supply of food storage the same kind of stuff that you know, I've been told my whole life.
Speaker 3:It's hard to know.
Speaker 17:This is in the beginning of, or the midst of, what I guess you could call us that they were put in place 18 months ago. So 18 months ago is in the beginning of, or the midst of, what I guess you could call the auto pen administration. So who was it on the American side that either gave the green light to this or provided the initial intelligence targeting? And is it possible then that these targets were even guided by American targeteers at some point? We know about this base, wiesbaden, germany, the US Army garrison, where they have and the New York Times has reported this, steve, as you just said, they have this gymnasium that's set up and you've got the Ukrainian officials right there with NATO forces, which means guess what Us, the Americans, sitting right there providing targeting Wasa target package at any point given to the Ukrainians from Americans for this, and, if such, do the Russians take that as an act of war from the United States on Russia proper?
Speaker 17:they're telling us that they were put in place.
Speaker 6:Somehow we're gonna trip on ourselves and fall into war.
Speaker 3:Yeah, geez yep, well, we're not. I mean, it's all simulation, right there's cory lewandowski. This is another thing. So by bannon ties in and I think appropriately. You know you've got the deep state and you've got the global deep state. They're kind of one amorphous blob yeah like.
Speaker 3:Clearly you might have some little factions and secret societies, but there's just this blob and this is why I believe it's so valuable to read books like Ayn Rand. Atlas, shrugged is. It helps. You see it see the philosophy behind that blob and how you have independent characters. And if you don't make a decision blob or Liberty, you know what I mean.
Speaker 6:Collectivism or Liberty Sounds like a new t-shirt, yep.
Speaker 3:The blob or Liberty. Give me Liberty, but not the blob. Okay, so just recognizing it as like one collectivism, like it's. They're just, they've sacrificed their will to a greater good that they then worship and follow, and it becomes greater than any individual in the cost rise and rise and rise. So Bannon's connecting all of it right.
Speaker 3:So it's hard to know, is it lindsey graham pushing war before war? And is he also connected over here? And over here and like we don't know, allegedly there's also some other really significant things happening on our end, behind the scenes, because you've got investigations into usa id, the rumor mill, which again is like sources breaking. I don't know we're going to find out if these sources are legit or not and if they actually ever come to fruition, but sources breaking that by this fall there's going to be some congressmen or senators that are on the USAID gravy train that are going to be indicted, and you know these people know they're under investigation, you know what I mean. And so there's like a whole lot of things we don't know that could be going on pressuring things to happen and things like that.
Speaker 6:There might be a lot of really weird public relations campaigns going on in the next six months.
Speaker 3:Yes, we found out in the recent days that there's like at the DOJ and their Sentinel computer system, there's like a secret access file. That's where they were keeping all the Mueller documents, the things that would have exonerated President Trump. That's where they were keeping all the molar documents, the things that would have exonerated president trump. So then when horowitz and durham came back and did their investigation, they didn't have access to the real smoking gun documents because they were hidden and apparently top brass doj didn't even know it existed. It was kind of one of these things that was programmed in there from the beginning. You know what I mean. And no one gets trained on it except the director and his cohort.
Speaker 3:You see what I'm saying. Ah, yeah, yeah, go figure, right, power corrupts. So they're finding those documents in these places, but that, of course. And then the other thing we found out is that they destroyed all the Trump assassination documents from Butler. We know nothing, they know nothing. There's no report on nothing. They destroyed it, yeah. And then the other thing too is they weren't putting things in the digital files and then putting them just in safes in various spots around the country you brought up that they kept terrorists off the watch list.
Speaker 16:You've been working very closely with dhs, which oversees secret service. We learned in the ryan ralph filings that he was trying to smuggle in afghanis afghani terrorists. Kill Trump, this was. He has a bunch of messages saying, hey, let's work with the cartels and smuggle a bunch of terrorists here and stinger missiles and shoot Trump out of the sky. Then the DOJ's filings I'm sure you know, I'm sure you've seen this, you probably know so much more than we do about these multiple Trump assassinations. We can count at least five that I think would be considered like an assassin attempt on our president. Are we going to get full disclosures about matthew thomas crooks, who he was working with, his emails, his text messages, his computers, his habits, photos of his room? Are we going to get like full disclosures on this stuff so we can finally unpack like how the hell we almost went into civil war and we ended western civilization with an on air execution of our president?
Speaker 18:You know, benny, I think it's very clear that there's been a lot of shenanigans that have transpired not just in the last four years, but the last four decades, that the government has covered things up because they didn't think the American people had the right to know. And what I believe is that providing the information to the American people is the best solution. And, by the way, let's hold people accountable. You know, what we heard at the Butler rally was that the Secret Service couldn't communicate with the local PD, who couldn't communicate with the county PD, and we're going to put in some new standard operating procedures to fix that. We had a president of the United States, the leading candidate for president, shot in the head by what they told us was a lone gunman whose body disappeared in 15 seconds. Benny, okay, the body was gone in 15 seconds. They had power wash the roof. Jesus, you can't get anything done that quickly and all of a sudden it's done and there's nothing here to follow up on.
Speaker 18:We'll write a report to Congress. Let me tell you something I know that President Trump, kash Patel, secretary Noem and everybody else in the IC community wants to get the answers, and I'll tell you Telsey Garber has done a great job on this of pushing people to release information, because the American people have the right to know, to make sure it never transpires again. So I believe in full transparency and I hope that every agency that's been involved in any of these cover-ups is held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, because we saw Lisa Page and Schrockrock right, the two lovers at the fbi trying to single-handedly take down donald trump, and only because of the work of cash patel and devin nunez in the house and others were we able to uncover that.
Speaker 16:And the fbi is a better place because cash patel is there yeah, I mean we have this photo of matthew thomas crooks on his phone right before he shot trump. It's like we've never seen this phone. Do you have any idea what this phone is? Any idea what all this evidence is? Who has it. Is it Tulsi?
Speaker 18:Look, I don't know the answer to that. I'm sure someone in the IC community has this. But, benny, it raises a serious issue. Ok, how is it that we have the premier law enforcement organization in the world, protecting the most important people in the world, and we still haven't seen a full report on what transpired at Butler One or at the golf course you know in Florida? So they're saying that there's nothing to see here, and that may be the case. But full transparency to the government, from the government, I think, is absolutely accountable and it puts people at ease to make sure that they know the American people know that our president is safe on all occasions wow.
Speaker 16:So you're saying that they were trying to like just sweep it under the rug and say, oh, we cleaned it all up before you guys got into the office?
Speaker 18:well, it seemed to be that the previous administration didn't want to share any of that information, as you know, and so, uh, they had no interest in actually telling us what was transpiring at that butler one rally.
Speaker 16:Wow, you know there was dna on the cocaine at the white house. Cory boy, they sure did destroy that evidence too. Next, time.
Speaker 18:I look, benny, you took the words right out of my mouth. How is it look? The truth is there was hunters. He would have just smuggled it in like he smuggled everything else and threw his nose.
Speaker 18:But so somebody actually left their cocaine in the locker and left it over the weekend. So I don't understand how, how that happens and nobody, nobody's been arrested, nobody's been held accountable, no one has gone to jail for it. And look, benny, privately, as you know this right, we had a purse snatching and in our department that was pretty high profile. That took a week to figure out who the culprit was happened to be. I know you're going to be shocked by this.
Speaker 16:Is a person who's in the country illegally, go figure go figure, at least you didn't have a flamethrower this time, goodness yeah and on that flame floor situation.
Speaker 3:So what that was? He had one of those weed sprayer bottles, oh, filled with gasoline and he was, and he had molotov cocktails. He kind of had both things going on.
Speaker 6:I heard he had 16 unused Molotov cocktail bombs within arm's reach when they took him down.
Speaker 3:Yeah, and apparently he tried to buy a gun but was denied because he is not legal to buy a gun. So you know, he just thought he could, but yeah, pretty wild well, maybe you didn't know about the gun show loopholes oh yeah the gun show loopholes, all right.
Speaker 3:So this is tom holman talking just about that. Hannity was asking him how do you feel about, uh, you know, terrorists being in our country? I mean, this guy, clearly from the very beginning, has always been no bueno, like you wouldn't think that you would want to give him a work visa?
Speaker 11:You wouldn't think, tom. Let's get your first reaction, your first public comments on this issue, out in Colorado.
Speaker 13:You know me and you have been talking about this for years, sean. I mean I worked for the network just before I came back to the second Trump administration and I've said over and over again you know what scares me about the southern border. The sex trafficking right, it's sky high. The Americans dying from fentanyl, the people you know, all the drugs coming across, all the sex trafficking, all the smuggling and I said what concerned me the most was they created the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever seen. Not only did two million known gotaways, two million people crossed the border. We don't know who they are, where they came from. We don't know where they are now. On top of that, even through the legal process, the Biden administration will bring people unvetted, handing out work fees like they're candy while they sat here and planned something bad.
Speaker 13:We are going to be dealing with this for the next 10 years because of the chaos they created in four years. We're out there kicking butt. We're arresting a lot of criminal aliens. We're out there looking for the bad guy. And when we're out there doing that, Sean, we've got protesters assaulting ICE officers. We've got members of Congress all over the country going to ICE facilities raising hell saying this is your oversight responsibility. Where was the oversight responsibility when 10.5 million illegal aliens came across the border? Where is the oversight responsibility I'm releasing over 8 million illegal aliens to this country? Where is the oversight responsibility then? This is an attack on ICE. This is an attack on the Trump administration. We're trying to fix the damage done by Biden.
Speaker 11:You're doing a great job and this was the most preventable national security threat, I would argue, in history. I have annoyingly asked you the question over and over again when you have known terrorists and murderers and rapists and cartel members and gang members in the country and you have them. You know 12 million, 15 million, 20 million. Nobody knows the actual number. And what did we learn from 9-11-01? They were at war with us. We were not at war with them. The 9-11 Commission report. They're plotting, planning and scheming. This is a terror attack. I'm worried about the big terror attack and of course, my prayers, my thoughts, my, my sympathies go out to the victims here. But do you not agree that if we don't find these people soon, that we are at risk of a 9-11 or worse?
Speaker 13:these people soon that we are at risk of a 9-11 or worse it's coming. I mean, why did 2 million illegal aliens pay more to get away? They could have paid half of what they paid. Cross the border, turn yourself in to a border control agent, get released that same day, get a free airline ticket to the city of their choice, get a free hotel room, get three meals a day, plus free medical care and work authorization. Two million people paid more to get away. They didn't want to be vetted. They didn't want to be fingerprinted. Why? This scares the hell out of me. I've been doing this for 40 years. It should have scared the hell out of every American. What the Biden administration did this two million known gotaways scares the hell out of me. So I'm convinced something's coming, unless we can find them.
Speaker 11:They came from over 200 countries. We don't know how many we know they're a terrorist.
Speaker 3:Got you kids.
Speaker 9:How's your life?
Speaker 6:They're ripping everybody up in here. What is that that you remember that that's? Uh, that was um an on the street reporter talking to a young man in like, uh, louisiana, that was having a yes, yes, god, you is god, your wife where is it? It's gotta be in here somewhere he's still searching. Yeah, I wanna find it it can't be that hard to find there's the gif rapist in Lincoln Park.
Speaker 8:That's it. He's climbing in your window. Obviously, antoine Dodson, obviously we have a rapist in Lincoln Park. He's climbing in your windows. He's snatching your people up trying to rape them. So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife and hide your husband, because they're raping everybody out here. The your wife and had your husband because they're raping everybody out here. The attacker got, went out the upstairs window, but he did leave something behind. We got your t-shirt. You didn't let fingerprints and all you are, so dumb you are really dumb, for real a crime scene investigator photographed and dusted for prints on the lid of the garbage can in the window.
Speaker 3:Obviously we have hide your kids, hide your wife, hide your husbands, because they'd be raping everybody hide your husbands on good news.
Speaker 15:Harry hinton over on cnn is laying down the business with the polling numbers after all of the waves cape ball went, after the last few months, the first five months of the donald trump presidency, right, the first four months of the don Kate Baldwin. After the last few months, the first five months of the Donald Trump presidency, right, the first four months of the Donald Trump presidency that you expect that Democrats are at this massive lead on the economy? It ain't so. It ain't so. The party that is closest to your economic views in November of 2023, it was the Republicans by 11 points. Now it's still within that range, still within that margin of error, plus a point advantage for the Republican Party. How is that possible, democrats? How is that possible after all the recession? Because, after the stock market's been doing all of this, after all the terrorists that americans are against, and republicans still hold an eight point lead on the economy. Are you kidding me? If it was just this one cnn poll, that would be one thing, but take a look at reuters ipsos. What do we see here? Party with a better economic plan? Well, in may of 2024, of 2024, just before Donald Trump was reelected president, republicans had a nine point advantage. Look at where we are now. The advantage actually went up by three points. Now Republicans have a 12 point advantage when it comes to the party with a better economic plan. And again, this is after months of economic supposed economic uncertainty, in which the stock market's been going bonkers, in which the tariff wars that Americans are against have been going on, and yet, despite all of that, the Democrats are down by 12 points on the economy. This speaks to Democratic problems on the economy better than basically anything that you could possibly look at.
Speaker 15:The Republicans still hold an advantage on the all important key issue of the day, which is the party of the middle class, has been a huge advantage for Democrats. I have polling from NBC going all the way back since 1989, when Democrats had a 23 point advantage. 2016, a 17 point advantage, but by this decade we already started seeing declines. Back in 2022, where you saw that Democrats led, but only by four points, well within the margin of error. And now, in our latest CNN poll among registered voters, which is the party of the middle class, it is tied. This, I think, speaks to Democratic ills more than anything else. They have traditionally been the party of the middle class, no more. Donald Trump and the Republican Party have taken that mantle away and now a key advantage for Democrats. Historically has gone adios amigos, and now there is no party that is the party of the middle class. Republicans have completely closed the gap.
Speaker 6:Kate, that's why you got.
Speaker 9:He's got me all excited to watch CNN.
Speaker 6:That's why you got blue MAGA now.
Speaker 3:After all, the blue MAGA hats might be a big hit around here. This is what it boils down to, and just the beginning of this clip, and we'll kind of wrap up on this. This is this is really what it boils down to, and this isn't to idolize elon musk or anybody by by any stretch, but this is a great quote and I think, if we keep this at the forefront of our thought, that we'll be a lot better off if I died?
Speaker 7:no that I did what was right or did my best to do what was right, and even if in the history books they said I did, I was still feeling okay about that.
Speaker 3:I care about the reality of the perception of it I care about the reality of goodness, not the perception of it there you go I care about actually stopping the war is not the perception of red, white and blue maga.
Speaker 3:Yep, exactly, red, white and blue maga. So care about the perception of good, the reality of goodness, not the perception of it. Right, we live in a world where a lot of people are doing it for the camera, a lot of people are doing it for the clicks, a lot of people are doing it for the you know the swag or whatever. You know the, the acceptance those polls.
Speaker 6:you know they really speak to the resiliency of this American continent. It's really just amazing yeah.
Speaker 3:And so last night we went to the GOP meeting and there was a situation where there's a state senator that ran for another office and won, so moved on. So they had a special appointment and they appointed someone into his spot and apparently I was under the impression they were appointed by the Republican committee or some committee made up of Republicans because they were taking a conservative Senate seat. And then they went to Washington and no one told them how to vote and they voted, allegedly their conscious, and voted lockstep with the Democrats on all the hardcore stuff, which turns out that's the one vote super majority that they've got.
Speaker 3:So this appointment is the deal breaker. So she's up for special election this year and they're moving a. There's a house member that's won like seven elections in a row. That's moving over to run for the senate seat. So they were nominating her in the party to get the endorsement. So she's running her campaign anyways. But she had so two people nominated her right first nomination in a second and then someone stood in opposition and his opposition was very clear and succinct and he had three very clear points and it one of them the big one was three years ago she voted for a bill that started a lot of the transgender craziness like that, that took parental rights and stuff like that.
Speaker 6:So she was one of the originators of all the bullcrap, yeah, and she took the r from her name, so she wasn't caucusing with the republicans.
Speaker 3:Now here we are endorsing her as a republican party. No right. And so he was like and and everybody there were all kinds of people stood in, mostly in support, because she's a good person and and you know, somebody was like she helped her husband get a surgery he needed or get you know that was a complication.
Speaker 6:Waffle around in the democratic party.
Speaker 3:And the one guy was like I'd rather let a flaming liberal in there and fight them in four years with a candidate we can really get behind rather than get someone in there. That is an incumbent that we can't knock off.
Speaker 6:It's incumbent that we can't knock off right.
Speaker 3:It's gonna vote with the democrats when it matters and uh, she's like oh well, that was three years ago. The speaking was like that was three years ago and you can't hold a vote three years ago against someone. It was like who cares?
Speaker 3:what they did three years ago, and I was like, like I care very much what happened four years ago. You know, I'm not over it. So, yeah, I care. And uh, also, it's like there's no responsibility for how we got here. Like this most recent bill they passed it took basically all the parental rights in washington away. Like it doesn't get, we don't get there without that last bill.
Speaker 3:So she voted against this one though, so it's okay. It's like, yeah, but they had a super majority, so your vote didn't matter, you know. So it's like it's hard to know. And then someone made the point we don't know what deals were cut, or if she traded one vote for another vote, and it's like it's hard to know. And then someone made the point well, we don't know what deals were cut, or if she traded one vote for another vote, and it's like, oh, I mean, who cares? It's the acknowledgement of what really politics is. But it's also like you know, what do you? When do our principles matter? And when do we stand in here, like I understand, no one else is running, like she's going to run, so either endorse her or not. But then part of me is like, well, maybe this endorsement should matter, like maybe a kitsap county republican endorsement should be important and not something that you're just throwing behind whoever as are.
Speaker 6:Yeah, exactly or not right or not? Yeah, so depending on what week it is, I mean I'll probably, I'll probably campaign for this lady.
Speaker 3:So I'm not saying like I don't know all the details, but I was like huh, this is really interesting, you know. But this it's in those grassroots meetings. That's where that stuff happens. Why do we have bad candidates? Because you're not at the grassroots meetings to speak up shoot, I guess I gotta start going.
Speaker 3:That's why dang it you know, like the republican party, especially, is bottom up, it is not top down. Democrat Party is top down, it's pervasive. They've got the media, they've got the messaging. You know what I mean. They're top down, but the Republican Party still wants to argue policy on a one-on-one basis, and so it needs good people to flood the zone. I mean, there's just no doubt about it. You need good people that have good policy, good communication skills to be the elected leaders, and you need the infrastructure behind it. I mean, you got to have it, so anyways.
Speaker 3:All right, guys. That's it for the show today. Don't forget to visit Pez's perspectivecom, don't forget to visit left behind withoutorg and please consider sponsoring a family for $30. You can help a family get YMCA memberships and sports teams, stuff like that. So don't underestimate doing even a little bit. It goes a long ways and we've got, I think, over 100 kids in the program. So, anyways, I say we, it's my wife's foundation, we're a non-profit, but anyways, take a look at that, because we're constantly hearing about the kids that are in need and stuff like that. So anyways, thanks so much, guys. We'll talk to you again tomorrow.
Speaker 1:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 1:What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress there is. There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do?
Speaker 1:Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No-one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by two-thirds majority in the case of more men, be quiet.
Speaker 1:I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then. The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 1:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up Now? We see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
