Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Freedom Fighters in the Modern Information Battlefield
Truth is under siege, and we're feeling the effects everywhere. In this eye-opening episode, we dive deep into how our institutions have been systematically corrupted to obscure reality rather than reveal it.
Brett Weinstein, evolutionary biologist and former professor, explains how we've entered a nightmare scenario where "they are sabotaging all of the mechanisms that we would normally use to figure out what's true." From universities teaching falsehoods to regulatory agencies protecting the powerful rather than citizens, our truth-seeking apparatus has been compromised at every level. The result? A society disconnected from reality, making decisions based on emotion rather than facts.
The consequences couldn't be more serious. Steve Bannon warns that current global tensions mirror the dangerous periods preceding World Wars I and II, with recent Ukrainian strikes into Russia dramatically escalating nuclear risks. "We are inexorably being drawn into a massive conflict on the Eurasian landmass," he cautions – all while most Americans remain distracted or misinformed about the stakes.
Domestically, we explore the auto-pen scandal surrounding President Biden's final days in office and expose how the "Big Beautiful Bill" being rushed through Congress contains a stunning provision that would prevent states from regulating AI for ten years. Most lawmakers voted for it without even realizing what they approved.
The antidote to this darkness is surprisingly simple yet profoundly powerful. "The truth is the rock," we explain. "When you build your house on the rock, when the rain comes, it won't be pushed away." By returning to principles, valuing information, and speaking boldly, we can rebuild our connection to what's real.
Ready to break free from manipulation and see the world as it truly is? This episode will change how you process information forever. Share this conversation with others who need to understand that in the battle for truth, silence equals surrender.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what? She said Let them eat cake. Here, you take the bomb. We're getting screwed man.
Speaker 4:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background With the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Perspective. And we're only three minutes late, but we did it.
Speaker 4:We did it. First try, first try. I know some of you might have been waiting in the other room that we just deleted, so go ahead and join us here.
Speaker 6:Apologize Is what it is Anyways.
Speaker 4:Oh, what a fun day we've got here. I was going to. What did I do here? Okay, I was going to pop this out. Okay, all right, we are definitely streaming on Rumble. Who knows if we're streaming everywhere else, assume we are. Seems to be pretty good most of the time. I'll stop twisting my hair, okay, all right. So we got a pretty good little show today for you guys, so let's jump right in with both feet. Sweet, okay. So this is Brett Weinstein. Brett Weinstein kind of came to fame.
Speaker 6:He worked at Evergreen state college, which is right here locally in tacoma right, and he they had a no white people at school day.
Speaker 4:Is it tacoma? I thought it was in portland. No, it's in tacoma. Oh, my gosh state college is in tacoma, jeez. So they had a no white people at school. Yeah, I remember that situation going on right, and so he was like, hey, this is kind of racist, like you know, but you're like really segregating against people with white skin kind of. And uh, he was like I'm gonna come to work and do my job and he got surrounded and they're like you're a racist because you won't let racism happen so he was like um, you guys aren't very principally based here.
Speaker 4:Like, yeah, like we're trying to teach you that race doesn't exist, but to acknowledge it at all times you know what I mean.
Speaker 4:Oh, so he saw a little inconsistency in their philosophy. Right, this was like six years ago. Yes, this was like 2019. Yeah, it was a while ago. Yeah, so he like got out. Of course, his wife was also a professor there. She ended up getting run out and then they started being part of the dark. Uh, what do they call it the dark? Horse dark horse, the dark horse podcast, yep, but they call it the dark.
Speaker 4:There's some kind of internet of intellectual oh, I don't know it's like joe rogan brett, eric weinstein, his brother apparently eric is smarter than brett.
Speaker 6:People say just I don't know. They're both pretty damn smart yeah, anyway.
Speaker 4:So brett is a uh, evolutionary biologist, which the significance of that. These are people who think through cause and effect, like, okay, we have something that we see in biology. What are the evolutionary triggers that would cause that?
Speaker 6:right. How do we explain this these?
Speaker 4:are the guys who go through and explain why you have a tailbone, right, right, and figure out all the reasons why we have it and or and or don't have a tail, you know. But they also go through and they figure out things like why does society work? So karl marx was big about this. Like you know, everything that happens in society is economically driven. You know, when there's not enough money for food, then you have revolution and he kind of. That's what karl marx's view was to view everything through a lens of materialism and economics.
Speaker 4:And that thought process is borrowed by people like evolutionary biologists to explain cause and effect for things that have no cause in nature. Does that make sense? It's one thing to be like. Oh, we have a evolution that allows us to eat the skins of vegetables that ants and other insects can't eat. They're toxic, and you know. It explains well, you know, we have a big enough, robust system and explains all that. But then it also explains why we have a revolution, right, but they're disconnected, like the reason why a biology thing would happen versus a reason why a societal thing would happen are different. What's Brett?
Speaker 6:talking about.
Speaker 4:I like guys like Brett who talk about that stuff because they kind of connect it all together. So here he's talking about truth and how we're in a, in an, in an era where we don't know what's true, and this is a huge cause of why we have such anxiety anxiety and we don't have a proper worldview that we share. Yeah, that's one of the things that people who study history the agreement on worldview is what made rome last. Believing in rome, believing in the united states, believing in a, a religion or a principle as a collective right brings about a lot of prosperity because we agree, kind of like believing in a fiat currency.
Speaker 4:Yes, it works until we don't ah right, okay, that's. The problem is when we start being disconnected from anything that's real. Eventually we have to settle back down to something solid. When our house is built on sand, when the floods come, it will wash away.
Speaker 10:Yeah, they are hiding everything, and what I mean by that is that they are sabotaging all of the mechanisms that we would normally use to figure out what's true. And that sounds like a wild exaggeration, but it isn't. The fact is, it's not even just an attack on the university system, it's an attack on every single university. The research done there is low quality, not repeatable. The lessons taught there are actually, in large measure, not even true anymore. Things that are verifiably false are taught as if they are true. Our regulatory agencies work exactly in reverse they protect regulators from citizens, not the other way around. So something is attacking all of the mechanisms in civilization that are supposed to seek the truth and act upon it, and that's not a coincidence.
Speaker 10:We are now in the nightmare that Rene Descartes feared he might see, ends where all of the things that he thought were factual might not even be correct. And because our truth-seeking apparatus has been under such intense attack, we don't know what's true Some things that are very easy to establish. It's not a difficult scientific question to figure out whether or not mRNA vaccines cause turbo cancers. That's a very straightforward scientific problem. But we are nonetheless left to grapple with anecdote because, to the extent that there are studies, they're likely to be set up to fail and the rest is anecdote. So we are left to make sense of the world without the most obvious basic tools, without anything that flows to us from the Enlightenment, and that is indeed a very dangerous predicament.
Speaker 6:I agree with everything he said.
Speaker 4:What do we say all the time we're only as good as the information we have. With everything he said, what do we say all the time we're only as good as the information we have? Yeah right, so if we're starved of information and in a low environment information, we start believing that santa claus is going to bring our tax returns. You know what I mean? Like we, just we, there's no connection to react, and that's something that we're.
Speaker 6:We just see left and right right, right and I you're drawing a connection between some absurd things here, but that is what happens by default.
Speaker 4:It just happens yeah, we, we're disconnected yeah right and all the tools that we would use that we get from the enlightenment which he mentions is great logic reason. How many times do we look at our own, the scientific?
Speaker 4:methods of the aisle and we're like, well, this doesn't really like paul, you know. I mean, you're just lacing up the boot on the right foot. I don't really like tyranny, you know. And it's like, no, this tyranny is good. You know what I mean. And we get other situations where it's like, hey, I feel like these regulations aren't actually protecting the people from anything. I feel like these are regulations for the purpose of regulating and control. Yeah, that's what's what's happening, but no, this will keep you safe. This doesn't keep me safe. You know the question on MRNA. This goes on and on and on. And here's the thing it's not new. That's what's funny about this. This is not new. So this is like 25 years ago. This is Alex Jones talking to Joe Rogan.
Speaker 13:It's back to. People need to start valuing information, valuing being informed and, joe, that's why it's important that you know the few intelligent celebrities like yourself that are actually involved and want to talk about this stuff and are concerned. We need to see more of our leaders, who aren't just in government but are in other facets of society, stepping up and telling folks that this is important because you're leaders, you're a leader and so it takes leadership. Important because you're leaders, you're a leader and so it takes leadership. We need more real leadership that won't be bought and paid for, uh, by the military industrial complex that's basically buying up our society. How about the secret agent exposed the cia? Turn to the news right now.
Speaker 4:Man, look there, it is secret agent exposed you know, 20 of all the people that work for the CIA are undercover 20%.
Speaker 13:They either have jobs overseas, you know where they're supposedly doing, one thing Most of them are in the media. How crazy is that. A lot of these guys you see reading off teleprompters on national news and this is admitted get CIA paychecks on top of it. Isn't that supposedly the story with Dan Rather? Wasn't that like a big thing on dan? Rather a lot of these guys, yeah isn't that great man, we'll throw back.
Speaker 4:You know what's funny, is it that sounds like us I know joe rogan's obviously from there, right, just fear factor host, stand-up comedian derelict. Yep, you've got influence, joe. Like eight people watch you at this point and look at where he's at now. But he's like hey, stand for truth. And that's one thing that the joe rogan podcast. They're not afraid to talk about aliens or planet x yeah, code of hamarabi, or he's not afraid to have people come in and talk about dire wolves and then I'm not afraid to talk about it either.
Speaker 6:I might laugh about some of it, but I'm not afraid.
Speaker 4:Right, it's so to tea but again, where's the truth coming through? At least Joe Rogan's trying to say hey, let's have a marketplace of ideas, let's hear all sides of absolutely. He wants to know about the age of the sphinx. Thinks it's older because of the erosion lines. Has an egyptologist comes in. The egyptologist, like the sphinx, is not old and there were no slaves that built the pyramid okay yeah, at least he has the debate right.
Speaker 4:at least he has the debate, so that's awesome. That's why it devolves upon us to do this podcast. For people like you that are listening to share the podcast is because the truth is obscure. The truth is not always self-manifest, but it doesn't require a defense. It just requires to be spoken. If we remain silent, we lose. If we speak the truth, it wins. The truth is the rock. When you build your house on the rock, when the rain comes, it won't be pushed away. If you build your house on the sand, when the doubt comes in and when all the things that don't hold, you know that we start doing things as policy that are designed to destroy society. It's gone. The foundation is gone because it's not connected to anything that's real. More and more, we're seeing our society being connected to ideas that aren't real, to philosophies that produce no, that produce no fruit that's not rotten Right, and we don't have the tools to judge those things. We have anecdote, we have anecdote, we have anecdote and so that's why we look at all these clips, we just anecdote soup.
Speaker 4:Yes, we assess things broadly, we base it on our principles and things like that and we have to judge for ourselves. You have to judge for yourself. I don't want anyone to just outright believe me. That's why I produce the clips and I explain myself so thoroughly. That's why you're in here as an ombudsman asking questions, is it's like we have to make sense of this world Right and it matters. There's a direct connection from the president's desk to your dinner table. The price of carrots and the price of gas are both determined at the federal level for the most part.
Speaker 4:Right, whether your sons and daughters go fight in some foreign war for the sake of that insert cause. Right, that's because somebody's pitching it to you. You've got to make decisions. Right, you get down this road far enough. I have a video showing ukrainians uh, executing deserters right they're being picked up off the street.
Speaker 4:They don't want to fight. They're not fighting necessarily for a good cause. All the time they're defending people in regions that voted to go join russia, so they're not really viewed as the liberators in their own alleged territory that they're defending. You know what I'm saying? This is an area that for what? Seven or 14 years, they were shelling the rebels and now they're coming in. Oh, we're the liberators, like you guys have been the problem as roff battalion. Okay, so I've got this video of of deserters being executed by ukraine. Is that where you want to send your sons and daughters?
Speaker 4:I don't think so no okay, and this is nowhere else really this is eric sch, another one of the rock star senators out of Missouri, which is the center of the conservative universe right now, and he's talking about what the globalists have in plan for you. The people in the last 24 hours heard three senators say debt slavery and someone else I can't remember that was, uh, elon musk talked about debt slavery. That phrase debt slavery is a common phrase that we use. This debt causes slavery. When you have debt, you're a slave. You have to go to work, you have to do these things. They're weaponizing your virtue of saying, well, you have to make your payment, you have to do this. Their whole system is corrupt and fraudulent. They don't show their numbers, they don't show where the money comes from. You know what I mean. The whole thing is just, but they're saying you got to pay it back. But they're saying you got to pay it back. That's slavery I mean.
Speaker 16:So listen to this. People who are handing out this money no real loyalty, in my view, to the United States of America. It's just sort of this globalist mentality. And so they're using your tax dollars to fund NGOs to fuel mass migration into the country. They use it to censor Americans who disagree with them. This was all being done with our own money, and I think that was a moment in time where we saw what the motives really were, and it was to set the narrative anybody who disagreed was an extremist, a nazi radical, you know whatever term that they want to use, which has now completely jumped the shark to demonize and then silence. And they were willing to use the government and create a disinformation governance board to work with some of the biggest companies in the history of the world big tech. It was, by the way, all on board with all of the stuff to silence regular americans who happen to raise questions about well, what about the efficacy of masks? Sorry, can't talk about that. Does. Does the vaccine actually prevent transmission? Sorry, you're silenced for that.
Speaker 16:Didn't this start in a l lab? You're a racist Shut up Like think of it. So just pick. Whatever the left's thing was, or or or. Why are we? Why are we spending one hundred and twenty, almost two hundred billion dollars in Ukraine when we have crumbling roads and bridges in our country? If you raise that again, it was all this effort to sort of other and cast out anybody that disagreed with the broader globalist kind of establishment and president trump broke the wheel, I'd like to say the fever broke I'd like to say the fever broke and he didn't say the thing that I thought he was going to say.
Speaker 4:he says that the elites are using uh. In the same interview just seconds later apparently I got the shorter clip but he says they're using the American citizens as just a tax farm. That's all it is. And when you understand tax money is currency, you're just the battery. You're just charging this thing up by participating. Your participation is their fuel, right? That's all it is. They're trying to carrot and stick you into total global domination and slavery. There's nothing more to it, right? If you disagree with that and the direction we're going, you're racist, silenced. You know what I mean. So, in an environment where not only can we not get the proper information for truth, those who try to even inquire, which inquiry is the way to know the truth of all things, maximum of law.
Speaker 4:Those who even inquireire you can't ask. Just asking that question makes you racist. That sounds so un-american. It does, but that's the thing. Are we living in america, right like I? There's this passage in this book justice. Is there a book justice? Denied, denied over there.
Speaker 4:There's a passage in the book Justice Denied where the author includes a clip from a 2009 decision where Justice John Roberts says that in the arguendo they believe that truth was enough to, or innocence was enough to, get a man out of prison. But in this 2009 decision, justin Roberts says that, through much debate and though we've argue windowed that innocence even matters, innocence doesn't matter, that's, your innocence is not enough to get you out of prison If you're falsely convicted. That's what the decision said. And the author in this book says he told his mom about it from a prison phone, right. And that's why he stopped arguing the merit of his case and started arguing the technicalities to try to get it appealed. That's okay and anyways, his mom was like I don't believe in america that innocence wouldn't matter. She sent him the case and she was just dumbfounded.
Speaker 4:You know, do you think that you're innocent till proven guilty? Then why do they call you up and say guilty not guilty and legalese may or may not are the same thing. So guilty, not just guilty, right. And they didn't even start doing guilty not guilty when you got arraigned, until the 1960s, so for 200 years we would say are you guilty or innocent? If you declared you're innocent. We presumed you were and you just posted a bond and got to go home and retained all your rights until such time, through a jury of your peers and due process, you were convicted of right but not guilty is not the same as innocent not guilty is not the same as innocent.
Speaker 4:You go not guilty, okay, well, you are guilty, but you're going to make some attempts to wiggle around on this, so we'll let you go home. But ankle monitor, oh, and, by the way, no guns. Oh, and, by the way, you know, you can't travel without notification. Fail, it took all your rights. Oh, we give you the presumption of instance. You didn't give me the presumption of anything. You gave me the presumption of guilt, with a few privileges while I fight this case.
Speaker 4:Right, right, that whole legal system guilty till or innocent till proven guilty was inverted in the 1960s. And who was paying attention? Nobody, but the minority community has been clamoring. The minority big community has been filling up the, the prisons and jails. And we're over here. Oh, it's just because there's too many laws for crack cocaine. No, we fundamentally changed the system, fundamentally changed the system, and then, instantaneously, you have the rise of the prison industrial complex. Why, again, we don't know, because we're not being told anything correctly. It's always something to be aware of. The other thing, too, is this situation in ukraine with china and russia. This is all interconnected, so we're gonna follow up on this a little bit.
Speaker 4:This is steve bannon talking about how close we are to major, major conflict and I I think his analysis is excellent and the reason we play this stuff is, as soon as we're aware of it, we can change how we see it and how we vibrate and project out. Now some of that sounds a little woo-woo, but there's something to that right On 9-11, that little randomizer counter like shifted 30% because the energy shifted. There's something to that energy field we create when we're all optimistic, when we're all looking for opportunity, when we're all looking to actually fix problems and we see clear eyed Americans get it done, because the human spirit cannot be defeated, because it's made in the image and likeness of the actual creator. Whatever. That is Right. And so we have this incredible spirit. But if you tamp it down, if you enslave it, if you de-incentivize it, we will. We will drown in a puddle of mud, right. We will not be able to lift our heads out and simply say you know, it's like the drowning person in two feet of water.
Speaker 4:Stand up. The solution is stand up, get off your back, stop thinking the water's deep, stand up. That's where we're at right now. If we know this stuff, we can stand up, we can make a stand. How do we do it? Doing this, share the show, listen to the show.
Speaker 4:You know, put a social media post out like a post from someone like Steve Bannon who's making a statement. You don't think that stuff matters. That is the war, that is the battleground, is the information space You're. The information we get or don't get is the war, because if we don't have the right information, we will slip into superstition, we will slip into xenophobia, we will slip into. You know, we're going to fix our solutions with our emotional responses instead of our logical, rationed decisions that lead to a better outcome. If we slip into emotion, the pendulum will swing. We will have white tears, followed by red tears, followed by blue tears, followed by green party tears. Right, it'll just be one party lacing on the boots, stomping on our throats, using you soup, usurping more power because of the last group and how they mess things up.
Speaker 4:So now we need more power with the same result and it's happening in this administration too, right, we talked about it yesterday with the ai. I'm not so certain. We want that. You know, if ai is going to be targeted against the people, that's a problem for me. Yeah, here's steve bannon we are.
Speaker 18:This is as dangerous as the summer of 1914, and this is as dangerous as the summer of 1914, and this is as dangerous as the summer of 1939. Or for the Americans, because the Americans really did, even with 1939, they didn't pay that close attention. England's getting done. You know there's some problems. Remember, the summer of 1941 in America was still kind of a lot of the stuff was on the front page. A lot of it was, but we still drifted into a war that the actions were taken in that summer of 1941 that led directly to Pearl Harbor. And Pearl Harbor came to a shock to people.
Speaker 18:And in 1942, early young men were not just signing up, they had already volunteered, they were getting to boot camp and getting shipped out pretty quickly into combat. And you know how that worked in North Africa, in the Kazarene Pass, in the early parts of the Pacific. It was a slaughterhouse. Why? Because young men were not well-trained. They were not well-trained, they were thrown in as cannon fodder because we had not prepared. Of everything that's going on.
Speaker 18:And now, as I said, we're going to have the convergence of these crises, the convergence of these crises, the convergence of these crises, and it's happening before us, the one that overwhelms on. This is why. Why do I always start when I talk about the three things president trump's working to to make sure that we he brings peace and lays down the guns, the kinetic part of the third world war. I'll be brutally frank, I'm not so sure. We have not and we're not quickly passing the part of no return on that. President trump came into office with the american people wanted. President trump's been very focused on it. Um, but you have to ask the question is everybody in this government aligned? I noticed I have not heard John Ratcliffe come forward from the Central Intelligence Agency and I would love John. I think it's incumbent for John Ratcliffe to come forward from the Central Intelligence Agency and say absolutely, 100%. We had nothing to do with this and we've wound down that thing in Wiesbaden. Right, the Germans want to keep it up because the German Chancellor is not over here for his health, he's not coming here to take the waters. Okay, this is like the Churchill types things of meeting with FDR before we were actually involved. Oh, this is Ben and run around His hair is on fire. My hair is not on fire, but I can see what I see and I've called this as how it's unfolding and it's getting more and more dangerous. There's a call I'm going to talk to Natalie in a moment after the break. There's a call on Friday. On Friday with she and Scott Besson. We love Scott Besson.
Speaker 18:He's just on TV, I think on Fox or CNBC, saying, hey, they're going to prove whether they're a good partner or not. Mr Secretary, I'm not so sure right now. They're looking to be a partner. I think they got a partner. That partner is in Moscow. I think another partner is in Tehran.
Speaker 18:As much as President Trump is trying to get ready to lay down their arms and make sure we don't go further nuclear. The mullahs couldn't have been more insulting of what they said with the package. And this package is not something that a lot of the war room posse right, and a lot of people in Israel are going to be excited about. And we've been the first to say, hey, you can't have any military, no military engagement, no troops in, no bombing raids, but you can't have just some verification program. You got to take this thing apart. Well, what was proposed was a long way from taking it apart and the Mulas could not be more insulting to President Trump. So we're in it now and the pressure is going to get ratcheted up.
Speaker 18:What President Trump did today in that true social folks is stunning. No American president, fdr, lincoln, johnson, kennedy, nixon, reagan no one's put out in real time. They talk about a readout, just a technical term. This is when the like the State Department, the Kremlin, after the call, they get all the legal, the diplomatic language. They put out their spin. He gave it to you raw Right Kind of the, which they put out their spin. He gave it to you raw right Kind of the look sound like the moment. They hung up, as President Trump has wanted to do to disintermediate the mainstream media.
Speaker 18:That thing came down. Jack Posobiec saw it, called me. Boom, we had it and it was down quite quickly. It went back up. But read it, think about it Tonight, read that, read about it tonight. Read that, read what Putin told him.
Speaker 18:These guys in the KGB, they're not, you know, they're not into big flowery rhetoric, they're kind of into action. They've been humiliated. The Ukrainians humiliated them this is an audacious, bold strike and showed the weakness in their nuclear triad. They didn't go off to conventional forces, they weren't there to get some Wagner battalion of mercenaries, they went to take down the equivalent it was equivalent of the Mexican cartels flying up to Omaha and taking out the strategic air command 40% of it on the tarmac, wingtip to wingtip.
Speaker 18:What would that cause here in the United States? You think you'd have a meltdown? You think you'd be vapor locked? You think you'd be coming after Trump on an impeachment? Right now it's Pearl Harbor. Yeah, putin was blunt. President Trump said I don't think we're going to be talking about peace for a while and oh by, don't think we're going to be talking about peace for a while. And oh, by the way, we're going to hit back and we're going to hit back hard. People should take that like a papal bull. These people are not kidding around. They're not kidding around and, as I've warned, we are inexorably being drawn into a massive conflict on the Eurasian land map.
Speaker 4:Bannon has been thematically right on everything since the strategy show.
Speaker 6:I didn't tell you this earlier, but on my drive in this morning I had this just weird feeling wash over me that we were going to war. Yeah. And there was nothing we could do about it.
Speaker 4:I think the realization is we've been at war but we're just like we always are.
Speaker 6:No, I mean kinetic.
Speaker 4:That's what I mean. We've been at war. It's just like we blocked oil for Japan, for Pearl Harbor that's an act of war. Blocking China and getting the Nvidia chips, that's an act of war. That's starving them of their lifeblood. Right the sanctions we've put on russia, blocking them from the world economy, that's an act of war. And so now you've got the situation where they just pulled, like he said, b-52 bombers on the tarmac, wingtip to wingtip, and omaha you think we're just gonna casually.
Speaker 4:Oh gee, we got 42 of our no, there'd be an extreme reaction. Can you get going on a replacement? It's not that simple.
Speaker 6:No, no, it would be an immediate and it would be.
Speaker 4:Yeah, and here's the thing. This is what's going on behind the scenes. So this is Larry Johnson. Don't have a ton of credibility in Larry Johnson. He's a former CIA agent on CIA, always a CIA Right. But this is the messaging that we're coming up with now and this corresponds with everybody's gut feeling about lindsey graham, who's, by the way over in europe right now doing talking, stump things, and we've got a veto proof vote. We're gonna override trump and keep this war going. Okay, here's a couple weeks ago, I heard on twitter, you know, a credible rumor just got off the phone. Lindsey graham's in a lot of trouble and he knows it, and it's going to get bad. Well, here's maybe a little bit more of the connections on that, and let me say something about senator graham I.
Speaker 15:there will be news coming out in the next couple of months about how he has profited financially off of money that came out of ukraine, laundered through Latvia and made its way into his bank account, and we're talking significant amounts of money. Department of Justice is looking at it.
Speaker 16:All right, those are serious allegations leveled by a CIA officer, former CIA officer, larry Johnson. We shall see.
Speaker 4:So imagine if you've got people like Pompeo, bolton, biden, lindsey Graham, mitt Romney, other people that are all getting payoffs and have business interests in Ukraine, and then, even worse, actually funneling back taxpayer dollars intended to help with this fight. And these guys are pushing this money all the time.
Speaker 5:Mm, hmm.
Speaker 4:So, yeah, we're going to war, because why do we care about the crimea? Do I care about a bridge crossing over some body of water that I can't?
Speaker 6:I couldn't even tell you what it was no, I just want to make sure our politicians got a third.
Speaker 4:Yeah, I want to make sure lindsey graham's eighth vacation home is free and clear, right? I mean like this is oh boy, where are we at? Look at history. Has there been a good one? Have we had a good war for a while? I mean, we just blow past all the diplomatic solutions. The next thing, you know kapow, kapow, kapow Now. But you know, this isn't to say that Ukraine's not now the supplicant. And they're like hey, you know, we'd like some peace. So here's Zelensky yesterday doing his little press conference.
Speaker 14:you know, after a huge attack, this is like Pearl Harbor being like oopsie, sorry, we're ready to wave the white flag. My proposal we offer, which I believe our partners can support, is that we propose to the Russians a ceasefire until the leaders meet. We offer a meeting any day, starting from Monday. Why ceasefire before leaders meet? Because we can meet. And if there is no mutual understanding, if there is not desire for de-escalation, if there is no desire and vision how to put an end to it, then the ceasefire will be over the same day. It can be initiated unilaterally by the Russians. Please feel free to do so.
Speaker 4:Lay down your arms, comrades so we bomb the crap out of you. Okay, it's like we will retaliate. Secure. This sounds to me like he got a phone call from somebody in the united states government. It's like you're done as far as this executive branch is concerned. You're done.
Speaker 2:Ceasefire, ceasefire, we're done, we're good, we're good. What?
Speaker 4:We're. This is remember. You get that revenge, and this is something that we've been reminded over and over again. Is you know, we look at Putin as like a hard line or nationalist? No, he's outflanked on the right at the Kremlin. No, he's outflanked on the right at the Kremlin. He's got people floating around him that are like push the nuke button, we'll rule the ashes. You know what?
Speaker 1:I mean Russia's big. We'll survive. We've got bunkers in Siberia.
Speaker 4:I'm not kidding, we have the same thing here. We got our John Boltons out there that they've never seen a village they didn't want to bomb and then taxed to death with IMF loans. So he's got hard line too. So he's trying to play a balance. Our world leaders that possess nuclear buttons, I think, understand the consequence.
Speaker 4:You hit that button, it's likely over for the planet. It's extinction level event, self-brought on. We'll see who's around in a hundred years when the dust cloud lifts. You know what I mean. I mean, this is like you're playing with the end of everything and simultaneously you've got ai coming on. One of the things that was I was listening to today was when ai fully gets on board and when these data centers start popping up everywhere. There's a lot of countries that are going to be left behind, that are going to be like we got one chance to bomb a data center. You know know what I mean. Because if AI is going to be a weaponized tool, we can't be left behind. We can't be just stuck buying commercial applications, you know, and we don't have the engineers to do it. It's going to be China, usa, russia and a couple of third-party actors that are sponsored by those three, and how long before the internet goes dark.
Speaker 4:We already think it's mostly fake.
Speaker 4:Dark. We already think it's mostly fake. Okay, yeah. So what would be the loss? Keep in mind there's there's a real effort to retool the uh navy right now, so hexeth orders the navy to strip the name of a gay rights icon, harvey milk, from the ship. Now, I never really knew who our harvey milk was, but apparently, according to chuck schumer, erasing harvey milk's name is disgusting, blatant discrimination, and during pride Month to boot. He served the US Navy, his country, honorably, and he was assassinated while serving the public and fighting the LGBTQ rights. Hegseth should be shamed of himself and reverse this immediately. And somebody made a little post, a little comment. This is DC Drano, an attorney, big social media warrior. When Harvey Milk was 33, there's documented evidence that he dated a 16 year old. This makes Harvey Milk a pedophile. America doesn't name warships after pedophiles. Good job, secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, on restoring honor to our Navy. And this is how it usually goes Right. Look at what. Who's the director that married his daughter, or something like that, or some teenager?
Speaker 6:Oh, I know who you're talking about the 13-year-old.
Speaker 4:Yeah, like this the allowance for oh, he's a LGBT rights activist and a pedophile.
Speaker 6:Yeah, you remember back in the day why is he so active?
Speaker 4:The great LGBTQ war. Do you remember the Onion clip? Have you seen this? No, oh man, we're're gonna take a second, okay yeah, there's been a.
Speaker 6:There was a movie made about harvey milk.
Speaker 4:I didn't see it, but it was played by, I think, sean penn okay, so this is uh, this is from the onion back when they were really funny okay we'll get through this ad here.
Speaker 9:This is an ad, youtube, okay, okay with military recruitment down and the need for soldiers greater than ever, some say it's time for the military to change its policy of barring homosexuals from enlisting. Well, joining us today from the Pentagon is General Robert McBrayer. Thank you for coming. My pleasure, brandon General. The military has been easing restrictions on enlistment in almost every area on criminals, older veterans, even those with serious medical conditions. Why not gays?
Speaker 5:Gay people are different, brandon, under no circumstances can we put America's homosexuals in danger.
Speaker 9:But the homosexuals themselves are demanding the right to serve their country in a time of war.
Speaker 5:Gays of America are the only group left untouched by war. Special, pure and rare, like a gleaming diamond or a snow-white colt. We must protect it. Has this always been the goal? It has been the solemn oath of every man in uniform to lay down his life in defense of America's precious, precious homosexuals.
Speaker 9:How many soldiers' lives? Is the life of one gay man worth Seven? General, I was about to go on a half-and-a-half policy which many see as discriminatory.
Speaker 5:The reason we instituted that policy was because we knew we would never be able to keep out all the gays. To know that any of them managed to enlist and put themselves in harm's way, it would break our hearts All of the top commanders know we love them too much.
Speaker 9:So you're saying that the military's entire purpose is to fight so that homosexuals don't have to?
Speaker 5:Nor should their fragile psyches be subjected to the horrible sights that occur on the battlefield. Their pure minds should be reserved for thoughts of man on man or woman on woman romance.
Speaker 9:Well, thank you for clarifying this very sensitive issue for our viewers, General McBray.
Speaker 5:My pleasure.
Speaker 4:God blessica and her gays god bless america and her gays, which, coincidentally, seems to be a little bit of a problem. I don't know if you're aware of this. This is going to blow your mind when I show this to you. Okay, when? Uh, because now it's not the onion. Yes, this comes from inwokeness, and this is 40 percent of our calendar year is dedicated to LGBTQ.
Speaker 4:February 19th to 25th, aromatic Spectrum Awareness Week, gosh. March 21st to 25th. Lgbtqia Plus Health Awareness Week. March 31st Transgender Day of Visibility. April 6th, international Asexuality Day. April 13th, international Day of Pink Day Opposing Homophobia. April 14th, day of Silence. April 26th Les Day of Pink Day Opposing Homophobia. April 14th, day of Silence. April 26th, lesbian Visibility Day. May 17th International Day Against Homophobia, biphobia and Transphobia. May 19th. Agender Pride Day. May 22nd, harvey Milk Day. May 25th, pansexual and Panromantic Awareness Day.
Speaker 4:Entire month of June Pride Month. June 23rd. Stonewall Day. June 28th. International LGBTQ Plus Day. July 24th. International Non-Binary People Day. July 16th. International Drag Day. September 16th through 23rd Bisexual Awareness Week. September 23rd Celebrate Bisexuality Day. Entire month of October LGBT History Month. October 8th. International Lesbian Day. October 11th, national LGBT History Month. October 8th. International Lesbian Day. October 11th, national Day Coming Out. October 17th through 24th Gender Fluid Visibility Week. Are you sick of this yet? October 19th International Pronoun Day. October 19th Spirit Day Support for LGBTQ plus youth. October 23rd through 22nd Asexual Awareness Week. October 26th Intersex Awareness Day. Entire month of November Trans Awareness Month. November 5th Transparent Day. November 8th Intersex Day of Remembrance. November 13th through 19th Transgender Awareness Week. November 20th Transgender Day of Remembrance.
Speaker 2:Holy smokes.
Speaker 4:They make up between 1% to 4% of the population and we got 20% of the calendar year celebrating it.
Speaker 6:We have to protect these people. It's only a matter of time. They're too precious Before 100% of our days.
Speaker 4:They're too precious to subject to the woes of society and the pains of civilization. We must guard them, we must give them special benefits and everything.
Speaker 6:Okay, do this right now. Look up Rob Schneider Pride Month and play that clip. I'm serious, it fits this perfectly yeah yeah, I actually know that one.
Speaker 4:Oh perfect, rob schneider, pride month and uh, just so you guys are aware there's a little bit of cursing. He said what?
Speaker 16:he said what the pride month seems a little greedy.
Speaker 2:Four weeks in a row, we get veterans. You fight for the country. You get a day. Thank you for fighting for the country. Oh, I'm sorry, day's over. Take the meat off the barbecue. Memorial weekend you die for the country. They give you a weekend. Thank you for dying for the country. Take the boat out of the lake and put it on. Take the boat out of the lake, put it on the truck. We get a weekend. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves, kept the Union together, gets a date, not even his own date. He's got his share with George Washington, who founded the whole country. He doesn't get a date either. He's got his share with Lincoln, but if they would have sucked each other's dicks they would have got a whole month. That's all I'm saying. He said what?
Speaker 4:that's nobody okay, so sorry people, it's just crazy. It is so, it's just crazy. So hopefully we're correcting the playing field here. Hopefully we're correcting the playing field here now. Keep in mind, you know, we've had a lot of layoffs, so there's there's great things that happen hundreds of thousands of government employees laid off. But here's a little again inside story. It's just anecdote. We don't know because they're not telling us this. But what if these people were just to come right back in? What if they double dipped?
Speaker 3:I worked for a contractor for the federal government and today I onboarded two former gsa employees that took the elon musk incentive and retired early, and now they're back at their same positions, just through a government contractor. So basically, they took a little bonus and are back and the government is paying them through a contractor to be back at their jobs, savings aware. So for a contractor with a revolving door and so they'll change their.
Speaker 4:Instead of getting a pension, they're going to get a 401k. Okay, that's really the only difference, government contractor. Maybe they're easier to fire down the road? I think so, probably. But yeah, still seeing people see in this, in a world where we've made this observation, that policy is people and if you have the right policy but the wrong people, it doesn't get enforced. So, in that world, what are these contractors doing? I don't know. Maybe these are just paper pushers or I don't know, maybe they're not ideologically driven. They took the payout, which probably means I don't want to work in this administration, but I will.
Speaker 4:Wow, that's just another one of those things we talk about waste, fraud, abuse, talk about wasting taxpayer dollars. Well, there you go. There's a great example of it. We laid them off, not, but then again you know it probably pads the employment numbers. So they going going onto this idea of nothing we know is true. So how many people got laid off and rehired in the same position? So now we've got one month with layoffs and one month with extra hires, but it was a net neutral deal.
Speaker 4:It's kind of like the Joe Biden saying I got 20 million people new jobs. You get 20 million people new jobs. You've got 19,000, nine, 19 million, 900,000 people their same job back. You just let them go back to work. You didn't do anything to increase employment. In fact, the numbers show that the net gain over the last four years administration regime really was that all the new jobs that were gained were net to immigrants and that legacy citizens didn't get one single net job increase in four years. Sounds about right, yeah, but don't worry, the numbers are good. Meanwhile you've got former government employees like this. This is the guy who wrote the book Anonymous during the Trump administration that was acting like he was a firsthand witness to a bunch of inside stories. Turns out he wasn't and he was writing this book from undercover. And then, about when his cover was going to be blown, he came out and said I wrote the book Anonymous. I'm anonymous.
Speaker 12:Right and owned it. So now he's, like, really concerned because he's worried about retribution against. Donald Trump was a rough and tumble exercise. He made it so, but we always knew if he got reelected his goal would be revenge, and that's exactly what he's trying to carry out.
Speaker 8:What is he trying to do to you and your family?
Speaker 12:Look, I think he wants to create a modern blacklist and have that blacklist ruin people's lives, because it's a lot of effort to go through with trying to pursue and prosecute hundreds of your enemies. All you need to do is try to successfully do that to a couple, to send a message, and that's what some of his officials have said is the point of these executive orders against me and Chris Krebs are to send a message and to a certain extent, that works.
Speaker 4:I mean in the immediate wake of this okay, so the whole january is due to work. He's still pushing his freaking book. So the whole january 6th thing? Right? Well, you create a blacklist and it scares people because they only have to prosecute a few. What if they prosecute 1600 out of a crowd of a few million? You think those other million people aren't terrified? I mean, that's something we're learning as I'm meeting people who just went to January 6th. I spent the last four years under a rock. Yeah, they went dark. They went dark Exactly.
Speaker 12:I'm the sole income earner in my household.
Speaker 6:I had to leave my job, oh boo-hoo, you're on freaking MSNBC.
Speaker 12:My daughter had to return to work so that we can buy diapers, so we can pay the mortgage. We had to go long, okay.
Speaker 4:I lost a lot. Same thing I was kind of targeted for you know a minor thing. I mean, you wrote a book. You're claiming free speech. I was same argument I tried to make.
Speaker 12:Launch a legal defense fund because we don't think we can pay for the legal bills for this type of thing. And then there's the security threats, which I know you're all too familiar with.
Speaker 4:But you get crazies coming out of the woodwork you should see some of the messages people sent my wife yeah, vile from the maga side, who will dox you and your family member? Oh yeah, sedition hunters.
Speaker 12:My address out there all over the world totally loved it loved it and send threatening messages and you never know which one of those is going to become the real thing. You know, I'll add to that, nicole. Someone told us relatively recently you guys need to go update your last will and testament to name a guardian for your daughter. I will tell you that's not something you do when you're sitting there with your wife and a lawyer signing documents to name a guardian, in case the worst happens, because we don't know what's going to happen. That's how serious it is. And that's just being named on the blacklist. Charges haven't happened yet. They haven't raided our house yet. That's what it looks like in modern day America when the president adds you to that list.
Speaker 4:OK, based on the fact that they haven't raided anybody's house yet. Yeah, and you're on MSNBC People. They've actually come after the judge who actually guided a legal immigrant out of the courthouse, and a congresswoman that actually assaulted an officer, you know, and obstructed his duty. Like everyone else is just doing something.
Speaker 4:And you're over here. We're terrified. I've had to hire legal. What an asshole. Imagine how I felt when my neighbors like hey, fbi is poking around your house. Oh, okay, like yeah, it's chilling, bro, that's why I'm over here. Like, I don't like the boots. I don't like if the boots coming from the left or the right. You have a boot, so welcome to our club.
Speaker 4:Miles taylor, you were one of the perpetrators of this bullshit exactly. You lied about the president. You lied about your closeness to them. You did that for profit and gain or ideological purposes. And now you're here. I'm terrified. I'm terrified. I might be held accountable and if I don't sell a million copies, I won't be able to buy diapers. Yeah, legal defense fund. I'm a single household incomer. So was I. Yeah, household incomer. So was I. Yeah, I got five kids. Yeah, f off. How do you think I felt? Now you won't talk about this targeting list. How about this one? Breaking?
Speaker 4:President donald trump plans to shut down the quiet skies terror surveillance program. This is through the tsa, faa, department of homeland security, the quiet skies program, also known as a ssss by the biden regime, to target its political opposition. As I exclusively reported, this is briannallo, tulsi, gabbard and thousands of conservatives were added to this list. I'm currently suing TSA over this. Quiet Sties was launched in 2010. The program never caught a single terrorist.
Speaker 4:I was on this list. I had this exact same boarding pass SSSS. It tells everybody you're going to interact with, that's going to touch that boarding pass, that you're a terrorist, yeah, and that you need to be followed by special treatment. You need to be swabbed down and you need to be dang near strip searched every time you go through security and every item of your bag has to be touched and every hem of your garment and the liner on your suitcase has to be taken out. It took me hours to get my boarding press printed. It took me hours to get through security and then at one time, I missed the flight to court. I had to wait in the airport for like 14 hours for the next flight and fly a red eye and have court at 7 am the next morning.
Speaker 4:Right, why? Because I'm on the SSS list, the quiet skies list, the domestic terrorism list, me. I'm just trying to go to court to settle the matter and I can't get on a freaking plane. Right? They use this, they weaponize this. I'm glad that miles is now aware of this right, but I'm also kind of glad that there's rumors that they're just getting rid of the program, because I don't think you should have that boot. Yeah, if you're not catching terrorists, you know what I mean. Then what is this program for it's harassment? They put tulsi gabbard on this. That's how ridiculous this is.
Speaker 6:We're an information zone where we don't know anything I've already forgotten that guy's name and I don't want to know it, but what an asshole okay.
Speaker 4:So this is another thing. With the with the auto pin scandal, massive breaking, breaking trump, let me make sure this is great. Trump orders, orders AG Pam Bondi to launch a full investigation into the Biden-Ottopen scandal, as well as any cover-ups related to his health. So let's see where this goes. But this is the order directing her to do this. Section 1, investigation A.
Speaker 4:The counsel to the president, in consultation with the attorney general and the head of any other relevant executive department or agency, shall investigate, to the extent permitted by law, whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental health state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the president. This investigation shall address any activity, coordinated or otherwise, to purposely shield the public from information regarding Biden's mental and physical health. This is another phrase for a conspiracy, coordinated or otherwise. Conspiracy Any conspiracy to deprive Americans of their rights. Conspiracy to deprive Americans of lawful representation Any agreements between Biden's aides to cooperatively and falsely deem recorded videos of the president's cognitive inability as a fake. Remember the cheap fakes? That's a cheap fake. That's just a bad camera angle. Showing biden shaking hands with the ghosts. Oh, that's just a bad camera angle. Showing barack obama taking him by the hand and quietly leading the old man off the stage.
Speaker 4:There's a lot of bad angles and then the debate happens and the phrase cheap, frank disappears from the, because we all watched joe biden melt down on stage.
Speaker 2:I killed medicaid at that moment, at that moment, 10 minutes into the debate I'm sitting in prison watching the debate, with a room full of white guys, some of them neo-nazis.
Speaker 4:In the back, in the sports room, in the sports side, all the black guys have their chairs turned around and they're watching the debate over here, all the muslims watching the debate. And, and the other opposite corner are all the hispanic paisas, the latinos, watching the debate over here, all the muslims watching the debate. And and the other opposite corner are all the hispanic paisas, the latinos, watching the debate. All of us watching the debate on like three tvs, yeah, but mainly the white tv, white person tv, right, we're all tuned in on our headphones and when that happened, there was like a.
Speaker 2:I stood up like.
Speaker 4:I stood up and John stood up and the other J six or three of us in there all stood up and, excuse me, there was only two of us. There was another guy, it wasn't a J six, but he acted like one Stolen valor.
Speaker 2:They all stood up and they're like you guys are going home. We knew I went and called my wife after the debate. I was like take the house off the market, baby, I'm coming home. We knew I went and called my wife after the debate. I was like take the house off the market, baby, I'm coming home.
Speaker 4:She didn't, but either way Got to have your pets.
Speaker 4:Between Biden's age to cooperatively and falsely deemed recorded videos of the president's cognitive inability as fake. Any agreement between Biden's age to require false public statements elevating the biden's capabilities. Did they tell reporters to report his health was good to say he's the sharpest he's ever been. You know the whole reporting from jake tapper that they were targeting you, joe scarborough, and they were trying to make sure that you thought that he was cognitively good because you're a disinformation propagandist. The purpose of these activities, including to assert the authorities of the president. Did they do this in order to capture that authority? The counsel of the president shall also investigate, in consultation with the attorney general and the head of any other relevant agency, the circumstances surrounding Biden's supposed execution of numerous executive actions, including during his final days in office.
Speaker 4:This investigation shall address the policy documents for which the auto pin was used. Did you use the auto pin to tell Ukraine they could launch missiles deep inside Ukraine? Did you use the auto pin to authorize the EPA to disperse billions of dollars in funds on the way out the door? Did you use the auto pin to authorize Alejandro Mayorkas to ignore existing laws? Did you use the auto pin to execute these commutations and pardons in the slew of pardons, right A slew the policy documents for which the auto pin was used, including clemency grants, executive orders, presidential memoranda or other presidential policy decisions, and who directed that the president's signature be affixed. So this is a pretty broad, sweeping investigation, in my opinion.
Speaker 6:Seems like they should be able to prove a lot of that.
Speaker 4:And Ed Martin, who's slowly becoming my favorite person in government Some people are going to get arrested, spend a lot of time in prison At POTUS is the right man, has the right man to investigate the auto pin trees, and that's from truth Justice. Don't know who he is, ok, but Ed Martin posted this the auto pin company division of Dimalac 2016 signature signing machines catalog. So he pin company division of dimelac 2016 signature signing machines catalog. So he posted this. He's like, uh, and he says on it sir, we have, we will get to the bottom of it all. So ed martin who, by the way, seems to be very aggressive at least he's good on tv. Okay, I'll skip that one for now, okay, so we also talked yesterday about the ai pages in this big beautiful bill, which my official opinion is we know nothing. Yeah, we know nothing.
Speaker 4:The budget numbers and what they're arguing about on tv, about deficits, I'm sorry, it's like climate change. So the the data is faulty. Yes, the data is faulty. The data is made up. Yes, the data is made up. Let's argue about it, okay. Well, let's argue about it. Let's use the. Yes, the data is faulty. The data is made up. Yes, the data is made up. Let's argue about it. Okay, well, let's argue about it. Let's use the premise that the data that you admit is false is real. So we know that we're missing $21 million. We know that there's magic money printers. We know that the CBO, who does the scoring on this stuff, is vehemently partisan, right, we know all that. So how are we assessing this sucker? Oh, we know all that. So how are we assessing this sucker? Oh, it's going to increase the national debt. You got one side saying, no, this is going to decrease the national debt 1.7 trillion a year. And you got the other side saying, no, it goes up 2.5 billion a year and inflation is zero. And inflation, yeah, but there's no again, there's no deal here. We got a couple of messages here.
Speaker 4:Zelensky is a former erotic dancer, true, who played the piano with his penis on tv. That is also true. He banned elections in ukraine because he knows he never will get re-elected. It's a clown world. Yes, yes, that's true.
Speaker 4:Anti-socialist league money comes out of a different bucket of money when someone is employed versus being contracted. Uh, yes, that's true. However, all money is fungible, and when you look at what they did with social security and medicaid and they used it to fight in Iraq and then they tried to refund it with other defense spending. It's fungible. It's a bucket of money, the government's money. They only reserve it when it's going to go somewhere they want it to go. Otherwise it's completely fungible. That's the big, it's the unbelievable part. It's no different than a corporation. You can have different funds, but they rob each other.
Speaker 4:The Mormon church got trouble a couple of years ago because they took tithing funds, put them in a special account that only can be spent on charity. It can't be spent on overhead salaries or anything You're supposed to have already spent that. They put it into a trust fund or a fund that's supposed to be for charity. It amassed close to a billion dollars. There was a whistleblower about it's been about eight years now, nine years ago that said, hey, they use that money to to infuse capital into the mall that they built in downtown, the clear Creek mall, and they bailed out a mutual insurance or whatever the insurance company that the church owns, out of their charity funds. So he did a little whistleblower thing, saying this is not a charity fund and we're not using it on charity. It's like we got a billion dollars in there and we might disperse two million dollars a year and they're usually on things that are not wouldn't be categorized as charity. Irs investigated after about three years the church paid a 20 million dollar fine and made a statement of oops, sorry, we'll try to spend more on charity.
Speaker 4:Okay, money is fung. If you have it, you can spend it anywhere you want, right. Just like they clearly could not spend that money on anything other than charitable activities. But somehow they got the accountants to make the transfers because it's in your control. It's just like your personal bank accounts. You can have a savings account that you say is for your kids' college, but when you need that new refrigerator, little Johnny's not going to have $3 3300 that he needs in that fund. You know what I mean. That's that money's fungible? Don't think it's not. You go to war. You're not filling in potholes, you're making them in the middle east yeah okay, same dollar amounts.
Speaker 4:Yeah, oh, this is gonna fix potholes somewhere, okay, uh, don't stop there. Shut down the homeland security and cancel the pay track while you're at it. Yes, yes that?
Speaker 4:Yes, that would be great. Okay, so back to the AI. This is Marjorie Taylor Greene. And again, here we have another example of you voted on a bill that you didn't read, that you didn't know what was in it, and this is one of our alleged heroes. I got to tell you something. I worked for a guy, a couple. He was a former F-16 pilot who then became a project manager at darpa oh okay, in dc and then she was a military intelligence officer for the air force that her last assignment was working at the pentagon and going to capitol hill every day to give classified briefings to senators and congressmen on different topics every day. So she's intelligence, classified briefings and skiffs.
Speaker 4:He's working for darpa they both retired, left it behind, moved out here, bought a farm and are now making cider. Okay, and when I said why, you know why this and they go we've seen too much. This is the future. Okay, I taught they're vehement democrats. They have no love for maga whatsoever either. One of these people, in fact she was particularly vicious about it and I was a j6 defendant. Okay, at one point I was like I mean, we pretty much all know that jfk was killed by the ca we don't know that.
Speaker 2:That's not true. There's no way to do something like that.
Speaker 4:I'm like, you're an f-16 pilot. You went on classified missions. You did look, I know a guy who was a submariner in 2008 that launched a tomahawk missile into venezuela. Did you know that? No, yeah, well, he's like I hit the button, but that's okay. He works for the bop now. So he's locked away without a body camera. He can tell inmates whatever he wants. So maybe he was spinning a tell, I don't know right. But he said clearly it's better to be the left hand of the devil to be in the path of the right. That's why I work for the government, so, anyways.
Speaker 4:So here we have another politician who we love. Oh, the reason I brought this couple up is she said as military intelligence. One day she said this really off the cuff and it was, but it was very clear and strategic. She goes oh, when we assess intelligence, why she said it? Like it's been assessed.
Speaker 4:Marjorie taylor green is the first one we would take out and I was like, what do you mean? Because he is so vocal and in the first two years that she was in, when she didn't have any committee assignments, she held up nancy's pelosi's agenda by forcing votes, full floor votes on everything, so she wasn't in a committee, she just sat on the floor and called for votes and totally obstructed. It was like the biggest oopsies the democrats ever pulled was kicking her off all the committees because she slowed up the agenda, thank goodness, okay. So thank goodness she did that and I think that earned her a lot of clout because she, like, was the wrench in the machine. But here you have her not being a wrench, not reading the bill, something she said she would always do.
Speaker 8:I never want to see a situation where state rights are stripped away, and that's exactly what. That's what it says in that bill text that it would take away state's rights to regulate or make laws against AI for 10 years, and I think that's pretty terrifying. We don't know what AI is going to be capable of within one year. We don't know what it will be capable of in five years, let alone 10 years, and I think we have to protect states' rights to be able to regulate and make laws that they need to make for their states make laws that they need to make for their states.
Speaker 12:That's 1,116 pages.
Speaker 4:Okay, we don't need to listen to the rest of that. Okay, there's this book right here called sacred duty. I read this book the first year I was married, 21 years ago. Sacred duty a true account of a BYU law professor's journey to defend the world's families. So what happened was he was.
Speaker 4:He was asked by some UN group to go participate this is like in the nineties, early nineties to go participate in some council on women's rights. And everybody around them all this is a conservative guy Everybody around him was like don't go, it's a waste of your time, it's just a UN. The resolutions like don't go, it's a waste of your time, it's just a UN, the resolutions they make don't mean anything. You know, put your attention where it matters. He did a little research and he found out that every resolution the UN had passed in a number of years eventually made its way into the language of executive orders, that the president's right and all these things. So he's like no, I think it matters, because this is what sets the agenda and then everyone else falls in line. So he went to this, this it was on women's rights and what he found there was they were, you know, women of the Islam world. They're like look, we're not fighting for feminism, like we don't want to take off this hijab, it's part of our belief system, we're totally fine with it. They we do it because we know it keeps our family strong. They had total rational societal reasons and he's like oh so you know, this isn't a fight just to liberate women from the hijab or get them driver's licenses. The way the UN was fighting was they wanted to completely, you know, dissolve the carrots and sticks behind keeping a nuclear family together. And so he fought really hard and he was like. He showed examples of, you know, un passesa resolution. In 20 years it becomes law in almost every country without really any debate on it. So he went and fought that. Well, here we are. If you go read this book, you see a precursor to what we're living today around the world. They ended up getting the resolution and he was fighting it Right.
Speaker 4:But that's where we have to be aware of these themes, because they take a long time to develop. These guys do their conspiring and their planning almost out in the open. That's how Alex Jones always seems to have an inside track. They literally publish what they're doing.
Speaker 4:2030 agenda anybody If I mentioned 2030 agenda a lot of people oh, that's conspiracy. No, it's not. This is your zoning laws. Right now, the big rezoning thing that Kitsap County is going through with, determining what to do with rural this county has been determined by you, un 2030 that this is going to be a rural, pastoral county. That's why there's almost no commercial development. There's no adequacy for low-income housing or or housing density is because the un determined that this region of washington would be rewilded, so it would be left in a pastoral landscape. Right, that's not coming from the county commissioners. You go sit with those guys and they're like well, how do we fix the traffic flow and how do we do it? Well, we can't, though, because we have this bigger directive we're trying to follow. That's the law we have to follow when we make our votes. Even though you know we think we have authority delegated by the people, we don't. We're really pushing their agenda.
Speaker 6:Right, and what people don't understand is if they don't follow that agenda, they lose out on funding which is the lifeblood.
Speaker 4:You know there was some senator that was like. You know, here's the problem. He says it was Idaho senator. It was like the problem in Idaho is everybody wants to cut budget. Everybody wants to cut from the federal government. When you get down to the brass tax, idaho brings in about a dollar's worth of tax revenue, but we spend a dollar 19. He's like we get the extra 19 cents from the federal government. He's like. So we don't want to cut any programs because we're not willing to raise the taxes to make the difference on the 19% and we're not willing to cut the spending because we're addicted to it. So you're being held at the state of Idaho, according to the center, is being held captive to ridiculous liberal federal policies that they adamantly oppose to a man because they need the extra 19 cents. So your freedom is being bargained for less than a quarter, two dimes. Ok, that's the comparison there.
Speaker 4:Johnson defends the mega bills 10 year freeze on state. He said. He said that Marjorie taylor green is wrong, uh, when she said in her current form she couldn't vote for it. And uh, johnson says I understand marjorie's initial concern. This is coming from politico, the liberal blog that's backed by usaid funds to the tune of eight million dollars a year. He said. I understand marjorie's initial concern, but I think it can be explained. The moratorium faces a long road in the senate due to the chamber's so-called bird rule $8 million a year, he said. I understand Marjorie's initial concern, but I think it can be explained. The moratorium faces a long road in the Senate due to the chamber's so-called bird rule which blocks anything but budgetary issues.
Speaker 4:Firm inclusion and reconciliation the process Republicans are using to get around the Democrat filibuster. Okay, we're arguing about the budget, how we're increasing the national budget, blah, blah blah, but this bill has nothing to do with the budget because that's because it's reconciliation and so it's really about the process. So, even though it sounds like it's a budget bill, it's actually just a process bill. The budget stuff will come through reconciliation because that's going to attack discretionary spending or mandatory spending, which is discretionary, as opposed to the discretionary spending which is mandatory. So you know, it's just a mired muck of poop and our congressmen, even the ones ones we love aren't reading the bills, by their own admission. It will surely be challenged under the bird crew crews, whose panel has jurisdiction over the language, said he expected challenges to the ai measure and other possible bird violations to take the next week and week after the week. Okay, it's better to be out. Holly said it better be out. Holly said after meeting Republican senators Wednesday, we didn't discuss it, but it better be out.
Speaker 4:So there is opposition to that and they're pinging it over state's rights. I look at it really simple. If AI has the power it has, we have to leave checks and balances in place, and one of those checks and balances must be the state and local governments. The state must be allowed to require, you know, regulation. Now we've got to police that. We can't let our states censor speech and things like that. That should be how this goes.
Speaker 4:The United States government should be hyper-focused on maintaining and preserving our constitutional rights and our right to privacy and things like that while implementing AI, and they should allow the states to act as a check to that. They should allow the states to put whatever limitations on it. We should have 50 different petri dishes to experiment how to best implement AI. The idea that we're going to give AI, which they're telling us is days away from singularity if we haven't already passed it. They're telling us they want to let AI make decisions and they want carte blanche for 10 years. Well, I, you, venezuela fell in less than that right, so you're not painting, in my opinion, a rosy picture. You're telling me ai is disruptive. You're telling me ai can be used as a weapon. You're telling me ai is going to make it almost impossible to get out of the way.
Speaker 4:But get out of the way. Give us 10 years of this. 10 years we might actually all be on the chain game.
Speaker 6:Yeah, you know, if ai is just making decision making a movie there might not be any of us left one of these programmers goes it's not okay to have blue eyes, and gerbils would have programmed it saying it's not okay to be jewish in 10 years, some of these ai will like completely take us over and start farming us for our biology, for our biological meat that they run on. Yeah, they'll just throw us in the incinerator.
Speaker 4:Yeah, now here you've also got this. This is Mike Johnson talking about the bill and how it's been crafted and how there's just not time to pass it.
Speaker 16:Elon Musk just said we need a brand new bill that doesn't grow the deficit. He was actually quote tweeting a video of you from the press conference this morning saying he tried to reach him last night. Do you have any response? He says we need a brand new bill that doesn't grow the deficit.
Speaker 11:We don't have time for a brand new bill and I want Elon and all my friends to recognize the complexity of what we've accomplished here this extraordinary piece of legislation, a record number of savings, record tax cuts for the American people and all the other benefits in it. We worked on the bill for almost 14 months. You can't go back to the drawing board and we shouldn't. We have a great product to deliver here. So I know it's not perfect by some people's estimations, but you cannot make a perfect enemy of the very, very, very good. We're proud of this product. The House Republicans are proud of it and we're happy to go out and explain that to everybody. So I'll continue to try to reach Elon and tell him extol the merits of our work here. I hope they'll understand.
Speaker 4:Thank you. The House Republicans are happy with it, except for Marjorie Taylor Greene, who voted for it without knowing there was an AI provision, and except for Massey who's like, hey, this increases the budget, so. But generally you almost have enough votes, right? So I don't 18 months to put this together. I understand, I can't even make a judgment. My can't even make a judgment. My inclination is just pass the damn thing right, give trump the power he needs and some of that structural change he needs. I don't like that. I don't know. That's. The problem is, this is again another one of these complex issues. You spent 18 months negotiating. That sounds like there's a lot of pork packed in, you know. I mean, if you spent 18 months negotiating it and then threw in an ai addendum at the last second that marjorie tay Greene didn't know about, did you really spend 18 months working?
Speaker 6:on this, and what else did you throw in there?
Speaker 4:Yeah, Doge happened for four months. These guys were negotiating this for 18. So basically for 14 and 13 and a half months this thing was in the works and then Doge comes in. One of the problems with Doge is Doge gave these lawmakers for the entire last year of biden's presidency yeah. So doge gave these lawmakers the ability to say, oh, we're gonna get a trillion dollars in cuts, so we don't have to cut because elon will find fraud and that'll be easy to cut and then, when elon felt short, he basically ran cover for these guys doing the hard work of actually making the cuts they just want to rely on.
Speaker 4:Oh, there's just so much fraud and fraud it's probably huge numbers. And you know, when you start the way they do the budget, they do it in like 10 year chunks. If you do the savings in 10 year chunks, yeah, you saved a trillion dollars. The problem is it's not a trillion per year. Okay, again, I don't know Where's this money coming from. I mean, is there a big mine opened up or something's this? What's going on here? Chuck schumer, on the other hand, he's got the opposite to say and this is pretty scary because if you take chuck schumer seriously, uh, we should really be careful, because this big beautiful bill this is the name he gave it- and we all know one thing donald trump is just lying about the bill, lying about the bill.
Speaker 10:Lying about the bill.
Speaker 1:Well, here's the. We are all going to die act.
Speaker 4:We are all going to die.
Speaker 6:That's their argument. Just take it to 100. Hold on, hold on a second here.
Speaker 4:All right, we are all going. Now, if we're talking AI, you might be right. We, we are all going to die. Ai is going to take us out, but that's big, beautiful bill. We're all going to die. We're arguing because such a chasm here. You know what I mean. Look at all these people that are going to come off medicaid. Look at all the social security.
Speaker 4:This is all anecdotal nonsense. We lack anything reliable to trust to make an honest assessment here. We're left to operate out of our gut. Yeah, this can't trust the cbo, can't trust the administration, because it's in their interest to get the bill passed, if not for anything other than just political capital. Right, a lot of bad bills get passed because the president's like just pass it so I can tell the american people I did something. And then the next president's like I'm gonna fix the thing he did. You know, yeah, every time I don't know. I hope the bill gets passed because I think it's geared around immigration, I think it's geared around some of that stuff.
Speaker 4:Clearly, I don't like everything, but I don't know, man, the arguments they're making is we're all going to die and this is the best thing that's ever been seen. We're. We're not talking about tax rates or any. You know this is not a policy dispute. I mean they're. They're laying this out there like it's an existential threat one way than other. Yeah, stephen miller says the big, beautiful bill. We are on a struggle for the survival of civilization itself. We have, and we have libertarians threatening to derail the entire gender over bogus cbo pie charts. We will be. We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the west if we don't control migration it seems like everybody in politics these days is so psychopathic.
Speaker 4:So we are all going to die if we pass it and we are all going to die if we don't pass it. None of the information of which we're basing our arguments are premised in truth. I think we're all going to die, Ron.
Speaker 6:Yeah, because we're being led by psychopaths psychopaths, yes, and the?
Speaker 4:you know we, we're being led by psychopaths. Psychopaths, yes, and you know we. We always have to be suspicious of everything. But right, this chinese student situation again, right, marco rubio is fighting with, uh, the chinese students, and this has more to do with rare earth minerals than almost anything else, right, uh?
Speaker 6:even though that's probably not doesn't come up in the conversation at all yeah all has to do with rare earth minerals.
Speaker 4:So there was also this. This was kind of a shocker, okay, so do you remember? Uh, miss binders, the press secretary, the last regime, big black hair oh, yeah, yeah, yeah black lesbian woman checked all the boxes. Yeah, I heard that she's defecting uh yeah take a listen to this.
Speaker 6:So I haven't heard this yet, but I don't like her who does?
Speaker 4:she was a masterful propagandist. She couldn't, she didn't answer questions. I mean she was. You want to talk about cover-up? This is Miss Cheap.
Speaker 6:Face she made herself. She made herself look so stupid most of the time because don't believe your lying eyes, these are cheap.
Speaker 4:You know Biden is running around. He's making us tired chasing him around.
Speaker 19:He's so energetic the toughest thing to see in the three weeks was there was a disconnect for me what was happening with leadership in the democratic party and how it was. Truly, as my former colleague, communications director ben labold, said, it was a firing squad and I had never seen anything like it before. I'd never seen a party do that in the way that they did, and it was hurtful and sad to see that happening. A firing squad around a person who I believe was a true patriot, a person who I believe did everything that he can for this country, a person who I believe, as I mentioned before, has done more in his in one term than most president had done in two term. Historical things, yeah, and I I was shocked by what I was seeing.
Speaker 4:I couldn't believe the party turned on him. I mean, he'd given him everything they wanted. He even gave him the auto pin box just to clarify.
Speaker 19:Answer other democrats and coming out against biden yep, I, I had never seen anything like that. That was, if you're asking me, the thing that I saw in those three weeks. That was shocking, shocking and um you had no narrative control.
Speaker 4:You put a guy on stage, hopped up on amphetamines, who then died. We watched it happen and you're like I don't understand why the party turned on him Because he's not competent to lead the country. There are some serious people out there, even on the Democrats, who understand what a nuclear winter would do to your income, and what three weeks is she talking about?
Speaker 4:three weeks, it was four years the three weeks from the debate to his, his stepping down as candidate. Ah, that three weeks, okay, right. When the whole party turned on him, you know when the media was like okay that was a bad night for biden, but he still won the debate joe, you did so good.
Speaker 19:You answered all the questions Instead of coming together to really be unified and trying to figure out how do we save our democracy, how do we fight back. That's what I was seeing and you know that's what. That's what we decided to do for three weeks and you know it was truly, truly unfortunate and I think, uh, it hurt us more than that.
Speaker 3:I think folks realized you think to have done and I know we're coming and thank you, thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much for your question. He's wildly.
Speaker 4:She's still defending joe biden and now she's like but it was the democrat party, because he was great I can't wait to read that so.
Speaker 4:So she she's jake tapper wrote a book about how biden was messed up and that's why the party turned on him. But they were blown away because the inner circle was covering up. This is the inner circle. This is the lady who has an office in the white house that allegedly goes and talks to the president. What message do you want me to share with the press? Every day he's. You know we're running around, we can hardly keep up with him every day.
Speaker 4:So now she's left the democrat party, become independent, right left the party. And now this is her tell all on the democrats. So it's the anecdote to jake tapper's book, where it was all biden's fault. Now she's like oh, it's all the party's fault. The party should have coalesced around Biden and just run with the auto pin and hit him in the basement. And Jake Tapper's like they should have never let Biden run in the first place. Wow. So Mark Halperin, another guy with inside scoops into both the Democrat and the Republican Party, had this to say on Jesse Watershow about this that the Democrat Party is in shock that Carolyn, their most loyal spinster is leaving the party.
Speaker 17:The reaction across the board is shock, for the reasons you said. How did she write it so quickly? Who's going to buy it and what is someone who was identified as a defender of a Democratic president in a couple months suddenly decides she's an independent. So I would say, so far more questions than answers. Here's Stephen A Smith on Binder's quote unquote transition Watch.
Speaker 13:What the hell are you going to show for that? Joe Biden, and how he was alert and he was spry and he was a great commanding chief and he was sharp and all of this stuff. You didn't have to do that, but you chose to live with your decisions live with your decisions.
Speaker 17:I mean, she just went on the View like a month ago and said Joe Biden was great and then, a month later, she's writing a tell all that said the Biden White House was broken and she switched parties. Well, look, based on what they said about what she wrote, I don't know that she's going to say anything different about Joe Biden.
Speaker 4:I think she may try to settle some scores, but for the most part she's trying to burn the party. All right, folks, that's all we got for the show today. It was a good one. Keep in mind, big things are happening. Find your hill, go die on it.
Speaker 4:Find your tribe world war 10's coming all right, folks, don't forget to visit peasants, perspectivecom and, of course, left behind withoutorg, and please go in the link below and check out 1776 Live and all the things we've got to offer there, because we are offering education that will help empower you for the coming days how to keep your shit and not lose it. All right, folks, we'll talk to you again tomorrow.
Speaker 1:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what night lived in that castle over there. I'm 37 Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What, I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 1:Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress. There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I'm Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 1:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 1:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then.
Speaker 1:The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up Now? We see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
