Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Immigration, Politics, and the American Divide: A Grassroots Analysis
"We're just peasants, every one of us." This raw observation sets the tone for a fascinating exploration of how ordinary Americans bear the brunt of elite power struggles while politicians play chess with our lives and livelihoods.
The immigration debate takes center stage as CNN polling reveals a seismic shift in public sentiment—Trump's approval ratings on immigration have rocketed upward by over 20 points compared to his first term, with 54% of Americans now supporting deportation programs. Meanwhile, California riots highlight the complex dynamics of enforcement policies, with allegations that state taxpayer funds are being channeled to organizations actively involved in organizing protests against law enforcement.
Diving deeper, we examine the fundamental tension between collectivism and individualism driving today's political conflicts. Progressive mindsets often seek change for change's sake, disrupting functioning systems without clear alternatives, while conservatives aim to preserve structures that demonstrate practical utility. This ideological divide shapes how different factions respond to challenges—some through infiltration and disruption, others by working within established processes.
The disconnect between political leadership and practical expertise creates dangerous vulnerabilities in governance. We draw compelling parallels to the Chernobyl disaster, where politically-appointed officials with no relevant experience made critical decisions about complex systems they didn't understand—a situation mirrored in many aspects of contemporary politics from border security to public health.
Join us for this thought-provoking conversation that will change how you view the political theater unfolding daily on our screens. By understanding the game being played, perhaps we can begin to change the rules that keep ordinary citizens paying the price for elite power struggles.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth Bunchik had no bread, do you know what she said Let them eat cake.
Speaker 3:We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. It's the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. So to the peasants perspective we're streaming everywhere. We're streaming everywhere, worldwide, worldwide, worldwide. You can hear us live in dubai. Okay, we got the pop outs open this morning, so we are running, except for let's just checking all the locations, facebook. I think we're good here. I don't even know. You know, it's funny tracking the numbers. Sometimes we'll get like a whole surge of people in one place and another. I'm like I don't know, is this like the same? You know three people? Yeah, I downplay our numbers. We're huge.
Speaker 4:Yeah, we're double digits, at least.
Speaker 3:It doesn't matter how many people listen at Speedless right.
Speaker 4:That's right Okay.
Speaker 3:Speaking of this morning, I want to start out with something that's kind of fun. Can you do that pop-out thing I was telling you about Bam? Okay, Tell me when it's all popped out, All right, so this is my friend Larry Brock. Really. This is Lieutenant Larry Brock Really. This is Lieutenant Colonel Larry Brock.
Speaker 4:He flies A-10s. Huh, he flies A-10s.
Speaker 3:Yes, damn this. I have walked hundreds of miles, ron. He's second only to you. Maybe actually I don't know I'd have to sit down and think about it. Am I in third place? You might be in third place at this point, yeah, as far as people who've walked the most miles with me side by side. So this is Lieutenant Colonel Larry Brock. He's running for Congress down in Texas State.
Speaker 4:Dude warthogs are so cool.
Speaker 3:So this is his campaign video, so I want to watch this with you guys. That's the right music.
Speaker 3:Thank you, I'm sorry. Donate now. So that is lieutenant colonel larry brock. Yeah, you can leave it on. There's a little. Donate now. Side there. Yeah, that's lieutenant colonel larry brock, and uh, like I said, I've walked hundreds of miles with him in federal prison. He was a january 6th in may. He was charged with the 1512 obstruction of justice and then the misdemeanors and I think he got a 28 month sentence, served 16 of it. He actually got the appeal that said they couldn't add enhancements to the 1512. Ultimately, the 1512 was overturned by the Supreme Court, so he served 16 months in federal prison for what ultimately amounted to picketing and parading in the capital, yes.
Speaker 3:So anyways, larryck is an amazing individual. He is absolutely the real deal, and he gets my full and total endorsement for texas state house.
Speaker 4:So please, uh, follow him and I don't even know the dude, but I'm endorsing him right now because he used to play a tens dude, that's badass yeah, his call sign was Torch.
Speaker 3:Oh yeah, that's perfect. Yeah, so she's got a cool story about how he got that call sign.
Speaker 4:It's my understanding that the A-10s are some of the most feared aircraft in our arsenal.
Speaker 3:Oh yeah, I mean it's funny because you know we'd read the Bible and he'd quote passages and he'd be like or an A-10 Warthog, you go off anyways. A lot of fun, very, very cool. Individual and, uh, highly motivated, very disciplined, excellent man.
Speaker 4:Couldn't, couldn't be better and understands who the real enemy is every time that our government talks about discontinuing a10s, I'm just like dude. That is a huge mistake.
Speaker 3:A10s are where it's at yeah, no, it's pretty cool, yeah, so, anyways, all right, so let's move on. That's lieutenant crowe. Larry brock at uh, I think larry brock on twitter or x, and uh, yeah, check them out yeah, vote early and often unless you're doing crap.
Speaker 2:But on wednesday yeah, don't send me to prison for saying that it was a joke.
Speaker 3:It was a joke. We are huge Weedon boys. We are huge. Yes, absolutely Okay, so check this out. This is Harry Denton from CNN, who is our most animated pollster. This guy just gets excited by the numbers and he's got some disappointing news for Democrats and people who think that there's going to be a huge popular uprising against deportation.
Speaker 9:You know, if we just take a look at the baseline numbers here, this is Trump's net approval rating on immigration. It's gone up like a rocket compared to eight years ago during Trump's first term. Look at this. In his first term Trump was way, way, way underwater. Nine is twenty one points, but look at this he's up over 20 points now. In the aggregate he is in positive territory at plus one point on his net approval rating. Some other polls even have it a little bit higher than that. There is no issue on which trump is doing so much better than he was in his first term, more than the issue of immigration. No wonder the times has written up the way that he is. Trump is begging for a fight on this because he knows what he's doing so far is working with the American electorate. You know why I love this guy?
Speaker 9:Yeah. So I think what's so important is it is his top issue so far and the reason it is. Why do you love him so much?
Speaker 4:I love this dude because every time I see him I'm like, oh, this guy's on CNN. And every time I'm like, oh, this guy's on cnn. And every time I'm like I wonder if he's worried about getting fired, because he's always showing like positive trump numbers I don't know.
Speaker 3:His clips get great views. Well, I'm sure you know. But the thing is, we see the positive views because that's maybe the reason I'd watch him. I'm not going to pull up a clip from him. Yeah, look at this everybody thinks trump uses too much spray tan. It's over.
Speaker 4:I know, I just think it's funny. Every time we show some positive numbers, I look down the corner. I'm like CNN.
Speaker 9:What? What's going on here? This top issue is because take a look at the individual nuggets in here. Why are people approving of Trump on immigration, approve of these different immigration actions? Well, trump's administration's program to deport those here illegally. Look at this Fifty four percent approval. How about agents searching your hometown for those that they think are here illegally? Again, positive territory here, above 50 percent for Donald Trump. So it's not just on the broad issue of immigration where Trump is doing well, it's on the specifics. When you dive into the issues, trump is above 50 percent and his actions are above 50 percent, at least with those most directly connected to what's going on right now out in Los Angeles.
Speaker 7:So Donald Trump, the president, picking a fight on this and, to an extent, you see Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, and the California governor, gavin Newsom, pushing back. So what do voters see in terms of their perceptions of Republicans, the president, or Democrats say Gavin Newsom on this issue?
Speaker 9:Yes, the American electorate believe that the Democrats don't have a clue on the issue of immigration. I mean you could just take it here Closer to trust more in immigration. Democrats versus Republicans Got three different polls for you across the board. They all tell the same story. Republicans believe on the issue of immigration. You see it here CBS plus six. You see it here CNN plus six, you see it here Ipsos even bigger, plus 19.
Speaker 9:No matter what poll you look at, no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans. The American public is with Donald Trump, and to a much greater extent than they were in term number one, and it's not just on the broad issue of immigration, it's on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans, and that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight and eager for those scenes out of Los Angeles.
Speaker 7:I was just going to use that word eager. This explains some of that eagerness to push forward ever more on this as it escalates.
Speaker 3:Harry, and thank you very much, for I think we could get better numbers if we just clip him up and put him on a channel. Call it cnn trump fanboy, no kidding. So the crazy thing about the immigrant okay, the immigration is a tough issue. Fair enough, right? Yeah, like these are real human beings. Let's not forget that. Yeah, they've come here hopes and dreams and cartel allure and now they're like oh, you have to go home or the money you're sending back we're gonna tax well, there might be cartel allure and there might be cartel pressure too yeah, exactly like they still owe the money you know.
Speaker 3:So this is very difficult. This is a situation that, unfortunately, this is just the reality of the common sense of how it is. You have to draw a line in the sand. You have to make a black and white, determinative yes, no, can you stay? Must you go? Like there is there, you're beyond the point where you can take an individual and go. Well, you don't qualify for actual asylum because you were seeking economic opportunity.
Speaker 3:We don't want to be callous and send you back to you know some village in the mountains of wherever. This is all hypothetical, of course. Sure, right, so you get into this like spot where it's like, ok, but I don't want to let the cartel guy here, who could probably mimic and mirror your same story Do you see what I'm saying? And he's going to do untold amounts of damage, including rape and murder. You're just going to pick almonds. But how do you differentiate between the two, right, how do you differentiate between the two when you find out that some of this is coordinated invasion, like actually going to prisons, enrolling prisoners in a program that says you can leave the prison if you go north on this bus? You know what I mean and then like so. So that's kind of like you are. This is some weird incentives okay.
Speaker 3:Historically this is called exile. The united states has become the land of exile. There has been an open opportunity for other countries around the world through ngos reaching out and grabbing these people and facilitating their transport across multiple international state lines and, in some cases, oceans, and then just dropping them here, insane asylums, jails.
Speaker 3:These different facilities utilize the United States as a land to exile people to avoid the cost of continued incarceration and care and human rights. Uh, you know, maintenance. They were just allowed to let them out and there was an organization's ready, willing and able to facilitate their transport into this land to essentially serve as a land of exile so that we can pay for them so we could pay for them, right, and they get absorbed into our social safety net, into what we're also simultaneously fighting, which is a control grid, which is just a prison planet.
Speaker 4:Okay so the whole thing I got warm fuzzies, yeah.
Speaker 3:So the whole thing, like, think about the carrots and the sticks, the plans that, as, as uh, katherine austin fits calls mr global and his objectives. We have become a land of exile, right? And so now we're sitting in a situation which we've talked about exhaustively on this show to our huge audience who listens every day, right, but you've got infiltration of a collectivist mind virus which goes by many names Socialism, communism, liberalismism. I consider myself a liberal, because liberal means individualism, but that word's been co-opted, right. Progressives, uh, all these different movements. Our universities are captured. Our medical system is a petrochemical based medical system that's completely controlled by rockefeller. Uh guidelines, foundations, money, you know everything. They said, they set the rules. Um, we've got uh a green energy scam that's largely being run by the oil companies themselves, right, yeah?
Speaker 3:over a climate scam and then, on top of that, you've got the overall big picture battle of collectivism versus individualism, which right now is representative of the by the ccp on one end and the united states and its democratic republic on the other end. Right, and what does that mean? What does it mean, ron? What does it mean when we're getting dumped on and we don't have ground to stand on? What's happening here? We're being abused. We're being abused, we're being, uh, diluted, right? I mean, a huge thing that we're finding out about these riots down in california is they have a lot to do with the uh. California belongs to mexico movement. You know the whole south, the southwest, the united states that we took after this mexican-american war or whatever. However, we acquired that and have to go back and think about that for a second right, that's why we got to turn la into northern tijuana basically yeah, like that's, that's the big movement, it's.
Speaker 3:We're in a precarious spot, clearly. I mean we're asking ourselves right now do we have what it takes to continue as a civilization as it currently stands? You know what you and I grew up to believe in the red, white and blue flag freedom America.
Speaker 3:Let's go get some oil like those things are slipping the American dream of buying a home and having a picket fence and raising your family and doing it your way. That's slipping. It is big time it's getting. I mean it's very disheartening when you think about where the jobs are and what the housing prices is around those jobs and you start thinking about your kids and what they're.
Speaker 3:You know the uphill battle they're gonna climb yeah it's tough we're pricing normal residents out here yeah, and you've got all kinds of crazy stuff going on. Here's donald trump yesterday in uh he I think three times yesterday in three different locations, talking about Gavin Newsom and what's going on down in California and those riots. By the way, we've got quite a few listeners that are down in the California area, like you know, within an hour of where these riots are happening. So I confirmed are these actually happening? Yeah, there's something going on down there, for sure. Okay, so this is Donald Trump being asked about Gavin Newsom and potentially arresting Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 4:Whoa.
Speaker 6:A crime has he committed? What crime did Gavin Newsom commit? I think his primary crime is running for governor, because he's done such a bad job. What he's done to a bad job, what he's done to that state, is like what biden did to this country and uh, that's pretty bad. It's a wrong philosophy. Uh, thousands, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, many of them prisoners, are taking up your health care, they're taking up your space in schools, they're taking up your hospital and, in many cases, they're criminals okay, trump just did some pretty cool judo there.
Speaker 3:Did you notice that some he turned, so keep in mind, just so everybody understands in many cases politics is a synonym for power.
Speaker 3:So when you're talking about politics, you're talking about power. This is a game of thrones, right? This is. This is loyalties and alliances and honor and dishonor, and money, money, money, money, money. Okay, so this is power, raw, unfiltered power.
Speaker 3:When the democrats had power, what did they do to their political opponents? They spied on them. They manipulated their life situations to make their life's living hells. They even went so far as to put the former president of the United States. Now, keep in mind, presidents have gotten away with things that you and I can't even imagine.
Speaker 3:Because we respect the office of the president, nixon was given a pardon as he walked away and we closed the chapter. Because we respect the office. We don't want to denigrate the office and the authority thereof. Right, that's what's going on, happens all the time. Why didn't they cover JFK and all of his affairs? Because the authority of the office commanded a certain amount of respect, and that went on and on and on until the Lewinsky scandal.
Speaker 3:And then, all of a sudden, the office of the president was something that was maligned. What? What Clinton did as an offense was not have an affair, that was not a problem. Okay, what clinton did was not lie to a grand jury. Oh, not actually a problem either. What clinton did was he besmirched the office of the president by doing it in the oval office and by getting caught. Okay, that's the offense. Everything else was manufactured to do that. Remember, that entire thing was found because they were looking at his real estate transactions, okay, and then they uncovered linda trip and monica lowensky and oh, we got him on lying a perjury and that was the impeachment. So Clinton cracked the seal on besmirching the office of the president, and then there was a recovery period. Bush could make fun of him for being a silly boy, but he still respected the office.
Speaker 3:Obama, now it's starting. We're questioning his birth certificate. You know what I mean? Is he a Muslim, all these things? Listen, I don't know the answer to some of those questions, to be completely honest to you, but they loved it when we talked about that, because then they could look at conservatives and be like oh, you guys, being so conservative and wanting to conserve tradition, you sure are quick to go after obama. You see what I'm saying instead of obama being, or them blaming Clinton for cracking the seal, they blamed the Republicans for persecuting Clinton, cracking the seal on, ok, and so then they would use that, they weaponize that.
Speaker 3:And now we get to Trump where. What did they actually do? So something changed in all of this when the Democrats actually got power and they came up against a man that they couldn't control, they couldn't blackmail. They could donate money to him, and he'd still go against what they wanted him to do. Right, who isn't in their clubs, as newt gingrich said, even going so far as to say their secret societies? What do they do? They try him. They use lawfare 90 something felonies convicted on 34 of these trumped up, misdemeanor, weirdo felonies. They want to put him in jail and very well could have.
Speaker 3:We know from leaks inside the White House during the regime that Biden expected Trump to be in jail by the time 2024 rolled around. Ok, so when Trump says things like you should be in jail and all this other stuff, do you think these Democrats, who understand that this is a game of power, take it seriously? They don't get a little weird about those threats? Yeah, these guys are walking a tight rope. Yeah, because I heard I can't remember who it was, but it was someone that used to work a lot with the Democrats. This still is a Democrat but is like one of these sane ones that's taken a step back from his party for the last decade. I can't remember who it is, but you know it was one of these guys that worked like in the clinton white house and super patriot, and now is like you know there's quite a few of these people.
Speaker 3:Yeah, the rfk is the world. So he was being asked you know, what is it about trump? Like why, why do they make such a big deal about his rhetoric? He's like because they don't know what to think about this guy. He's like is he going to come in with the hand of justice? Is he going to come? Because on one hand, it's like, well, you can expect that, but then, on the other hand, is it going to be the hand of vengeance? But again, he's going to. Is he going to go too far? Can we weaponize that? Their game planning has no idea how to plan for donald trump, because if they were in his shoes, the extent to which they would go. Remember, the democrats have no actual popular base that has any quote, unquote electoral credibility. Okay, they have illegals, they have college kids and they have the media and beyond that.
Speaker 4:Yeah, they're not in all the social.
Speaker 3:They're not exactly riling up 80 000 steel workers and farmers and ranchers and rappers to show up at rallies.
Speaker 4:Now they're doing social riots.
Speaker 3:They're doing social riots and they're doing paid for concerts. Slash political events.
Speaker 4:Yes.
Speaker 3:Right, they do not have a base, they have a aura, right?
Speaker 4:Okay, so that's a good way to put it.
Speaker 3:Has a base, okay, and now he has power and he has the levers that he they didn't have. What would they do if the if joe biden had had the charisma, the wherewithal and the mindset? Think about the speech he gave with the red background right, the absolutely terrifying speech where he called half the country dangerous domestic extremists on the MAGA you know, maga extremists that speech that he gave behind the seal of the White House. Imagine if he had the charisma of Barack Obama and the popular support he had. I wouldn't be out right now, I wouldn't have gone to where. I probably would have gone to an even more secure facility.
Speaker 4:You know what.
Speaker 3:I'm saying, like it would have, trump absolutely would have been in prison. They would have fast-tracked that sucker. It was because they didn't have the popular support that they had to meticulously go through and make sure they followed the process so nobody could be to blame. It's just the process, just you know.
Speaker 3:I'm saying and some attorneys that have kind of immunity because they do that all the time. You know what I'm saying. That's, that's what they're up against. So when he says he's going to jail, they want to take that serious question and the judo trump does here is he should be in jail and he takes it from tangible. He should be in jail for obstruction, which, keep in mind, you know that newsoms and some of these people's blood pressure is a little high, especially if they've been involved in something shady. And I'm not making allegations, I'm just saying, if you were a politician.
Speaker 4:Well, we don't even have to accuse them. They know.
Speaker 3:They know they're shady all right, your blood has to be boiling, so trump goes. Well, what's his crime? His crime was running for governor. Yeah exactly it's a good thing someone like you doesn't have the uh control of law and order, because you'd be in jail.
Speaker 4:Right. It's kind of like how do you know when he's lying, Because his lips are moving.
Speaker 3:He took it from a actual question of are you going to be vengeance to always? Crime was he shouldn't have run for governor and he judoed it into a political question that no one can hold against him. So if he does arrest Gavin Newsom, they'll be like is it because he ran for governor? No, that was politics. This is an actual crime. Right.
Speaker 3:You see what I'm saying. But if he does, if he is using the hand of vengeance, I don't know he just set himself up to have plausible deniability for having directed Pam Bondi to come down, like it, with a hand. Okay, most likely. What's going to happen? Nothing, nothing's going to happen. Gavin News likely. What's going to happen? Nothing, nothing's going to happen. Gavin is going to run in 2028. I don't know how you, I don't know how they cross the rubicon and take out politicians yeah unless, unless they physically lay hands on a cop.
Speaker 3:I don't think they're going to take their rhetoric and connect it to crime. I don't know, I don't think they're going to do that. If they could have done that, they would do it to trump, you know. Fight, fight, fight. Oh my gosh. Look, oh my gosh, look. We have a brawler, you know. I mean, they think that Donald Trump was encouraging every street fight in America. If they can make that connection, so I don't think they ever will. During these riots, one of the famous images that popped up, and again, everything, every single image you see of rioting, and these little clips, they must be taken as suspect. We show them on the show, we pontificate, we blah, blah, blah. It is very possible. As a warning, I, you, everyone that's involving themselves in social media and watching this stuff. This is very ripe psyop ground old videos from 2020 circulating, being passed off as if they happened today. Ai videos being generated because no one's close and specific and everyone's wearing masks. You know, there's so much. Just withhold total judgment.
Speaker 4:We could be totally fooled.
Speaker 3:Yep, we can be totally fooled. Withhold total judgment. This is one of the only areas where you'd go connect indictments to the people. Like you know, don't believe a video until you see someone got in trouble and owns the video. Does that make sense? Yeah, so I'm just saying, like some of this stuff, like I'm, there's been multiple times where I find out that we were duped and then the next day I forget to remind you guys, hey, we were duped. I take it out of the catalog of things to reference, right, but at the same time, like, just keep, keep in mind we are in a very precarious way forward here with ai and with deep fakes and with context scamming yeah, we're never trying to mislead anybody never, ever ever yeah, okay so I've seen things like this guy's illegal blah blah.
Speaker 3:I don't know that yeah I don't know that. I haven't read into his court stuff to see any of that. For all, from what I can tell, he was on a baseball team in Southern California with other guys that are Trump supporters. So this may or may not be an illegal alien. It's irrelevant. Okay, here's what he did. So this video, this guy, so these are Border Patrol, which are law officers, by the way.
Speaker 12:They're just out of the, they've been chased out of and he was throwing rocks at me. I don't know if you can see me doing the rocks, right there, ah jeez, what are you doing?
Speaker 3:Yes, Okay, now I don't know this, but if the Patriot out was on the clock in jurisdiction in LA, so it's 100 miles of that border.
Speaker 4:So I didn't hear anything you said while that video was playing.
Speaker 3:So he's throwing rocks at border patrol, they're driving down and he's also doing other things. That's not the only thing. There was one other instance where he was getting engaged okay and uh the uh.
Speaker 3:People don't know this, but during the, when the patriot act was passed, part of the many, many things that it did was it created a 100 mile buffer zone from border north where border patrol can do all law enforcement activity. Okay, so you know, if you escape the fence, you got to keep going 100 miles before you're really out of the guys in the green stuff chasing you out of their jurisdiction out of their direct chase.
Speaker 3:Like you know, they can flip the lights on and do what they got to do. Um, it's just like you know, if you're driving along and you see a sheriff I guess jurisdiction is the wrong word.
Speaker 3:Maybe it's like work area it is jurisdiction no it is like if you're driving along and you're being followed by a cop and you're like, oh my gosh, this cop will not get from behind me. And then you get into a passing lane and he passes you and you realize he's not from the county area, you're like, oh, oh, he's just going home. He's just going home.
Speaker 4:He's just going home, or?
Speaker 3:he's traveling to court for whatever, and you're like no same thing. But so you know, you're up in LA and you're like, oh, I'm good, I'm not at the border.
Speaker 3:No this is anything could be a checkpoint within 100 miles of the border, like every street is there, that's so. They're in there. They're in their home. Turf is what I'm saying you. Turf is what I'm saying, you know, kind of like. You know, it's not like I encountered the capitol hill police at the mall. I encountered them at the capitol. Okay, like on their turf. I mean, fair enough. So, uh, I don't know his name. I'm sorry, dude, it doesn't matter what your name is, can't hide he threw rocks. This is from the us attorney in la. He threw rocks at federal officers leaving a command post in paramount on saturday, a brazen attack caught on film that could have resulted in deaths. Reina, 40, is charged with assault on a federal officer and faces up to eight years in prison if convicted. The fbi is offering a fifty thousand dollar reward.
Speaker 4:Rewarding for his information leading to his capture. We need to just be bounty hunters, bro. Yeah, well, maybe we could be live streaming bounty hunters, oh go for it, bro.
Speaker 3:I am not doing that. I'm not doing that. You go for it, okay, okay. So the thing that sticks out to me is okay, it's pulling out law and order, like, oh, this guy should go to prison. You know, look what he did, bro. I don't know, eight years is a time, but I'm also like eight years, I did way less than that and I got seven years, three months, like that's. This is what makes this tricky. They overused it on us and now you're looking at this and eight years seems light. But then, at the same time, I'm like I literally sat and talked to a guy who was going home after five years after murder, right. So it's like, is this the same? I don't know, but definitely sounds like he's going to have some high anxiety nights for the next few days.
Speaker 3:All right, so I hope it was worth it yep, now, one of the things I want to remind you guys about is one of the playbooks of the left, and this is a mentality of the left. Okay, a conservative has things going on. They want to conserve something their family, their business, their existing structure, the existing way things work. They figured out their way in it. Everything has a utility and a function. You know what I mean. Like, like people who are truly conservative, like, have you ever met an atheist that goes to church every week? That's conservative. Have you met there? There's more and more and more of them. Have you met these people?
Speaker 4:Yeah.
Speaker 3:I've met a lot of them. Basically, you know, they get raised in a church good life, good everything. Rebel, turn atheist, totally think everything's atheist, but then realize the utility of religion and start going back. Yeah, right, happens all the time, totally viable. Okay, that is a conservative right where you want to conserve something because it works, because of its utility. A collectivist, a progressive, a current day liberal, these people want to change things, right they're they're politically stuck at the rebellion stage, like they want to change something for the sake of change itself.
Speaker 3:Yeah, alone okay, like for the sake of change itself. And so, um, the the ones who want to change things. The way you change things, you have to disrupt them, you have to create. You have to create the uh sand in the oyster or in the clam problem to create. You know what I'm saying? To get something new, you've got to insert something that's uncomfortable, and so it will get polished up and fixed. So there's this, and this goes back.
Speaker 3:The founding fathers were progressives. They wanted to change the social order. They were not conserving God, king and country, they were creating something new. Okay, the Bolsheviks, the Menshevviks, the anarchists in the in the russian revolution that were followed by karl marx and hegelian, they were trying to change things. Okay, hegelian was actually hired by the germans. Hegel was hired by the germans to figure out how to harness the progressive energy to get what the conservatives want, which was to go back to the way things were. So it's actually kind of interesting how that worked out. But it's this constant urge to change. They're the ones who will send in infiltrators to a normal, peaceful, functioning church. They're the ones that want to come in and disrupt things and throw a wrench in the gear. They're the ones that come in as secret agents. The conservative has no such thought.
Speaker 4:Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3:Why would you need to change things? I want to put my energy into just making them work, and unless something's wrong, unless there's sand in here, right in the, in the clam, then there's no reason for me to create any type of immunological societal response for anything, because we're trying to conserve the utility of everything that works. So that's why, in my experience, I can't think of a single time ever where any conservative faction or movement those who are trying to preserve the as is has ever infiltrated a group has, until it becomes open warfare.
Speaker 3:They've never infiltrated a group They've never instigated. They try to use the political process and the mechanisms and all the consent buy-ins because they want to conserve that Right. The progressive is like nah send a man in, blow up the tank from the inside you know, Manchurian candidate stuff, infiltrator operators.
Speaker 3:So remember back all the way back to 2016, when trump was running for president, when cnn was still, you know, kind of batting down the middle, before they'd gotten trump derangement syndrome. This is back when they thought trump was just a muse. That back when they thought he was a great distraction from hillary clinton, that it would draw turnout and and, uh, you know, put on display hillary clinton's great statesmanship and all her knowledge and right and when she clobbers them.
Speaker 4:It's just gonna be great, it's gonna be great?
Speaker 3:yeah, of course, because, though I'm with her. She beats back toxic masculinity. It's a perfect narrative.
Speaker 4:You know storyline, but instead it goes a little poorly, but back then just think what it would be if, like she, was able to say you're fired, you know yes, so back then, when cnn reports this project, veritas got this undercover video, it was like they didn't know what to do with it.
Speaker 3:They knew they were doing this, but they didn't know what to do with it.
Speaker 5:Listen first, the video. In this one released yesterday, a man named Scott Fovill that's him who was a contractor for Democracy Partners is seen and heard discussing Okay, I've got to refresh it.
Speaker 3:Go to 11 seconds.
Speaker 5:First, the video. In this one released yesterday, a man named Scott Fovill that's him who was a contractor for Democracy Partners is seen and heard discussing hiring people to attend Trump rallies and basically to start fights. This is a quote he says. I mean honestly it's. It's hard to get some of these assholes is what he says to pop off. It's a matter of showing up to get in their alley in a Planned Parenthood T-shirt, or Trump is a Nazi T-shirt.
Speaker 5:What he's describing, jake, is his plan to intentionally put people into a Trump event so that a fight could start and that that fight or that violence or that reaction by Trump fans would be caught on media cameras and that would be the narrative for that campaign. That man, scott foval, who you just saw being a recorded undercover, has been fired. The guy who hired him, bob kramer, is also on that video. He's the one who was under contract with the dnc. His wife is a congressman from chicago, jan shakowsky. I just spoke with bob kramer on the phone and he said that foval, the man on tape, is basically a braggart this is your mo.
Speaker 3:Like this is what the bolsheviks and the mensheviks like. This was the debate, by the way, between the bolsheviks and the mensheviks for those of you that are real russian history buffs. But this was the debate was how much direct action do we take? The Mensheviks were a little bit more reserved and the Bolsheviks were like all in, smash them, bring the Molotov cong tail with a copy of the constitution with you, you know? Oh, they were completely yeah. So back then, cnn was reporting that. Notice how he says it's actually hard to get these Trump fans to pop off.
Speaker 4:Yeah, I like that. I also like the mention of the oh, his wife is a congressman, or whatever it's like. Oh no, no kidding.
Speaker 3:Yeah, exactly Dude. I heard yesterday through back channel thing about somebody that's conservative that needed help from a Democrat senator for something that was going on in another state. That's a red state but in a very blue city. Come some court help and it's anyways, oh, where's it at? Oh, let me make some phone calls see if I can get that to go away. And I was like like that's totally exactly the whole, like you can just call a county jurisdiction, like in a red state, and make something go away because you're a democrat, fupa. I was like wow, wow yeah exactly.
Speaker 3:Wow, talk about poll. No wonder family of uh it's such a big deal when family of politicians get duis and stuff like that. Like most of them go away. The ones that don't are the big friends in high places paying the price. Remember that vote, that you didn't go my way right making that phone call I told you I'd make leak to the press.
Speaker 4:Instead, tell jimmy's nephew to have fun in prison yeah, that was my drop the soap, okay.
Speaker 3:So actually that's not really a problem because of the pre-act. Okay. So this is a february, california state congressman who's talking about the funding and about these riots going on down in la. Again, I'm pointing out the parallels. Once you see it, you don't really unsee it. It makes you question everything that happens as far as these riots and these public events.
Speaker 4:What's Prop 36,? By the way, I don't know, and don't care. All right, all right.
Speaker 13:February, when I was still on the budget committee, I raised concerns about 73 left-wing organizations that were receiving taxpayer funds state taxpayer funds for a COVID-19 project. That's completely wasteful. One of those groups was the Coalition for Immigrant what do they call themselves? Humane Rights of Los Angeles, cherla. This is one of the many groups on the ground in LA that has received state taxpayer funding to organize violent protests against law enforcement. And so when Democrats say, well, we don't have the money to fund Prop 36, how about this? How about, in this budget that's coming up this week, zero out every single dime for groups like CHIRLA across the state of California. And we're not talking about a little bit of money, we're talking about in the neighborhood of 100 to 150 million dollars. You know that just happens to be a pretty darn good down payment on fully so 150 million dollars going to groups that are instigating propaganda.
Speaker 3:And you wonder why violence you know that's spread a lot. So what do you need? 100 thugs to go and really get it going and then you know another two, three hundred, just guys caught up in the moment. Do you see what I'm saying? Like you can make $150 go pretty far. You know what you got going on the next couple of years you want to serve a quick little prison sentence for a couple you know a couple of bucks.
Speaker 3:Like that's the like, that's the assumption that you start to look at. There I can tell you from our end, ain't nothing like that happened at all. Right, I mean, you look at the carnage that happened to the January Sixers. There was no help other than coming from the people. You know stuff like. And again, I don't know man, these are politicians. They can make wild accusations that could prove to be completely untrue yeah, totally untrue, you know. So that's the thing. Just keep your head about you, don't get involved in this. That's what they want. They want the reaction, and the counter reaction is to give up security and give up liberty for security. That's what this feels like. I totally support Trump in, you know, quashing the violence. But what are you going to do here? And Mark Vixer Hansen had a great take on this, on what's going on, and this is kind of what I talked about, how there's just a big Marxist takeover, big collectivist takeover.
Speaker 10:I don't think I've seen a meltdown of them.
Speaker 3:And the interplay with Gavin Newsom and Trump and how Gavin Newsom just can't stink and win in California. You know, every time he comes on the national stage he looks kind of like a fool. He's trying to defend, you know, bureaucracy. After the fires he's like who's doing this? Where's the water? Oh, the building cuts. We've got to cut the reggae. You know he kind of flipped the script and then he's doing it with the girls. Oh, that's just ridiculous.
Speaker 3:We can't let girls play in women's sports. He's trying to defend the indefensible and then he'll like randomly flip the script as if you know, I don't know those guys. Yeah, I don't know who signed those bills.
Speaker 4:What's going on over there? I have no control over this democrat party.
Speaker 10:Dude, you signed all the checks, yeah, seriously I don't think I've seen a meltdown of a modern politician ever, as we've seen with him the last three days. He's pulling 27 popularity popularity. Two percent of the Democratic Party thinks he should be their next standard bearer. He got, he picked a fight with Donald Trump and called the ICE legal efforts to deport illegal aliens. He said it was reckless, it was chaotic, he sided with them. Then he said it wasn't violent. Then he begged Tom Holman to come after him when this kind of braggadocio come on, tough guy, come and get me. And then he picked a fight with the treasury secretary and he announced that because we pay 80 billion more than we get, we might not pay any taxes to the federal government at all. I mean, that's 1% of the federal revenue is California's so-called imbalance. But that was a felony to advise California taxpayers not to submit to the IRS what they owe. So he's just thrashing around.
Speaker 10:And then you look at the polls 54% of the people, even with this hysteria, want the deportations to continue. And we have the 100-day polls and the biggest demographic that was for Donald Trump's policies were Hispanics at 62%. So it's Orwellian. It's almost like you want to shake him and say do you really think the American people are behind you. When people are burning the flag of the country, they say they have to stay here, even though they're illegally here and they're waving the flag of the country. Under no circumstances they want to go back. That is insane. And the violence and spitting on the flag, burning the american flag and saying I got to burn the flag and I have to stay here and I'm going to wave the flag of the country, that don't dare put me back.
Speaker 3:It doesn't make any sense it does say a lot when you see this crowd here out in front of this ice building and you see all these mexican flags and other. I saw some other countries flagging here no american flags no american flags, redonkulous yeah so the the meltdown that mark victor hansen was talking about is right here. This is gavin newsom, basically being like come at me, bro, come at me okay do you have have any confidence that Pete Hegseth will be as principled?
Speaker 12:as Mark Esmer was. It's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows it's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That's just guys, weakness masquerading as strength. I don't even know he masquerades as strength. I'm in serious moment. I mean this human guy. These, I mean serious moment. I mean this human guy. These guys, it's just. It's the band of misfits. Yeah, it's, I mean, it really is. This is serious. The people's lives are at stake. The reputation of this country is at stake Great American cities and states. It's not just. This is not as a preview for things to come. This isn't about LA per se. It's about us today. It's about you Everyone watching tomorrow, I promise you per se. It's about us today. It's about you everyone watching tomorrow, I promise you. I mean this. This guy's unhinged. Donald trump is unhinged right now and, uh, this is just another proof point of that do you have any confidence that?
Speaker 3:these guys, man come at me bro so he's such a weird character. I hate to do this, but sometimes you just kind of are like bro bro.
Speaker 4:So I he looks like he's at a readings and he's trying to like try out for some kind of a play or something.
Speaker 3:So gavin newsom is nancy pelosi's nephew. He is yes, oh, you didn't know this. I thought you do this. This is making so much more sense.
Speaker 4:It's really common knowledge yeah, because he does act like somebody who's just so uh oh never.
Speaker 3:Just all the things are clicking. You're like yeah like oh shit this is all fire I was many years old when I realized everything I thought is wrong. These guys aren't experts. You're nancy pelosi's nephew. What are you like? Who are you like? Well, I don't understand any of this. Like you're just a grunt human. You mean Like, hey, let's get the pretty boy.
Speaker 4:I have this picture of Nancy going sit down. Gavin Shut up.
Speaker 3:Like a little school, making him sit with the apple on his head, get his neck sprayed. He's going through. Yeah, exactly so Gavin Newsom was married to Kimberly Garfoyle, who's now the ambassador to Greece, who was engaged to Donald Trump Jr.
Speaker 4:Okay, kimberly garfoyle, who's now?
Speaker 3:the ambassador to greece, who was engaged to donald trump jr. Okay, wow, his current wife, which I don't know her name she was raped by harvey weinstein testified in his thing and recently, in one of these little clips that gavin newsom posted, antonio brown, the football player, posted whoa, I slept with your wife, gavin oh my gosh.
Speaker 4:This is getting way too close.
Speaker 3:I'm just saying when he talks about these other people not being fake, like Pete Hegseth pulled the trigger. He went to war. Like he's actually an operator, like actually went to war and did that whole thing. Like Tom Holman actually spent a career on the border. So when you're like these people are jokes, are jokes. No, what's jokes are the people you appoint to run these things.
Speaker 3:oh, dude, let me see here, uh maybe my nephew can fill that position my nephew can be governor I got someone to recommend yeah don't bother reading the cv, I wrote it so there's a really great hbo documentary called chernobyl and unfortunately, the director is absolutely insane and, uh, real famous director camera.
Speaker 4:Is this like uh, what would happen if chernobyl was still a thing? I mean, what is what is it? What is it? What is the what is it about?
Speaker 3:chernobyl. When the nuclear reactor at the chernobyl went so is it like a documentary? No, it's a it's a docu-series, it's an. Hbo docu-series. It's like one season, 10 episodes, and it follows the story of this. It follows the story of a Russian scientist who basically is a whistleblower, tells the whole story of General Bullman, kills himself.
Speaker 3:So, it's his letters of explanation of this is what this was, the technical thing that happened. This is why it happened, the cover up. So I don't have the clip here I was, I should find it. I'll find it for a future episode because it's a great peasant clip.
Speaker 3:But um, basically, you know, the way the communist party worked is all the leaders are not experts at anything and they're just communist fat cats at this point, right, and so they're wanting things done. Cats at this point, right, and so they're wanting things done. And it's all politics. And no, the common door, you know grift, graft, corruption, and everybody's got a job is connected to somebody, blah, blah, blah. But then you've got the real people out there doing work.
Speaker 3:Well, when it came to the nuclear reactors and stuff, what happened was nobody wanted to present to the Politburo or the committee something that was negative. So you didn't want to come in and say, hey, I know you invested all this money in this engineering and this architecture, but there's a fatal flaw and we need to go back to the drawing board and start from scratch. That could get you fired, make you look bad. So the thing was look over all the minor flaws and so they had an engineering flaw that had to do with if there's like an overheat or a power surge, then some rod would drop down and that would block some blowback and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Speaker 3:Well, if the rod got hung up, the equipment operators, the machine, you know, the nuclear guys need to know that. They had to shut down. You know, turn on the gas turbines to feed the power, to recycle the process shift that they were on, the kids that were running the entire nuclear reactor are like 23. Right, and their job is just red button. Tell someone the red button lit up. You know what I mean. Yeah, they're not nuclear engineers.
Speaker 4:They're not nuclear engineers.
Speaker 3:They've been trained in the manual of do this, do that, do that.
Speaker 4:Right. Keep the needle right there.
Speaker 3:People, when you get into these systems deep enough that people running the show have never done the thing. When you're when business is regulated by people who've never earned a profit right. When you're like it's the same thing I've seen in the health department when the health officer is a 22 year old, fresh out of college, with an environmental science degree and I'm like you don't even who's never seen a septic tank, basic plumbing principle yeah, exactly you get overly concerned on ticky, tacky things that have nothing to do with the function of a system and then you overlook huge things like the slope of the pipe.
Speaker 3:You know what I mean, stuff like that. So, um, so, anyways, and in the in, in the so, in the movie, all all through the thing, you see the actual events of how the politics would get in the way of the. You know the disaster, even to the point of denying there was even a disaster happening for the first day. In the face with what he was dealing with, you're talking about killing millions and millions of people, destroying the water supply for all of eastern europe. For going on 40 000 years, he was like, oh, and then it was all hands on deck to mobilize to solve the problem and contain it right. So there's two stories here. The first story is that the system itself caused the problem because it wasn't merit-based, because it wasn't scientifically based. It was all politics. It was about power, maintaining power, the appearance of power, the appearance of might, the appearance of grandeur, the appearance of giving everybody a job Right All of that caused the problem. But at the same time, because of the control structure they had when they had the huge problem. They had the ability to mobilize the entire Russian economy to do one task, and that was to stop and contain Chernobyl. Every single helicopter, every single minor, the whole country mobilized. So there's this.
Speaker 3:I told you this whole story to get to this scene where they send out the minister of natural resources mining, right. So this is the guy who's in charge of mining, and it's some young guy that's in his mid-20s, wearing a nice suit, nice hair, nice fingernails, and he shows up at the mine to recruit these russian miners who've been mining generationally coal right To come and dig a hole underneath Chernobyl. They wanted to mine under the nuclear reactor so that when they shut the thing down it wouldn't drop down into the ground. They had to put concrete, more concrete under the reactor. So they actually had to mine under it like 200 feet and support it so that they could get it. You know, give it a spot to collapse into, okay, huge deal. Yeah, I mean, this is like what's the solution? You know, they say to the scientists he's like, he's like here's the reactor, you need to get under it and do concrete. And they're looking at him like what are you nuts? Anyway.
Speaker 3:So this guy shows up and he's basically asking these miners to go die right because you're gonna go dig under a nuclear reactor that's melting down right and killing people right, as they're doing this, right right, one helicopter goes to dump stuff on top of it and it gets above and he's like don't, don't, don't, don't, because they're just trying to drop the load on top. And he's like you're gonna have to drop it from afar and like build up a wall because of the radiation.
Speaker 3:Well, this helicopter oh my gosh I mean, they're like this is so serious yeah so, anyways, these miners are like ask us, like a man, and he's like come, save russia.
Speaker 3:And he's like that will come, for we're not coming for this soviet union, we're not coming for the it, we're not coming for this Soviet Union, we're not coming for the communists, we're not coming for any of you guys, we're coming to save Russia. And as they walk by, these miners are covered in black. Right, this guy's in his nice suit and they made this minister, who's never been to a mine, who needs to come and command these guys to come and give their lives for Russia, and the telling them they're going to do it doesn't work. And they have to get them to ask to do it Right. And when they come up, all the miners walk by and they, they tap them on the shirt and make them all black as they walk by patting them, you know, like that boy, you know we'll got, we'll take care of this kind of, but that's the thing, the peasants have to do it Right. And so I'm just saying yeah.
Speaker 3:Gavin Newsom is that classic fancy boy. Were you ever a cop? What careers have you done? Oh, some public financing and venture capital. Hedge funding Sounds like a great grooming in politics. You know, it's that exact minister that shows up and goes how do you know how to do the job Because I've been doing the job Well. Do you know how to do the job Because I've been doing the job Well? Have you ever managed somebody doing the job? Get out of town, bro. You know what I mean. Get out of town, all right. So, donald Trump, there was this other scene that happened yesterday. Which crazy. This is in Minnesota state representative.
Speaker 11:She gets up on the state floor and says this as his mother had died, my father, as the one processing the paperwork, put my grandmother down as his mother, and so I am illegal in this country.
Speaker 3:My parents are illegal here in this country so when the republicans in minnesota then referred her for prosecution for being illegal and running for public offense face plant.
Speaker 3:Turns out I am a citizen. I am a citizen, clarifies minnesota democrat. After saying she came to us illegally, turns out her dad is lao shen and he's homong and when he got after the end of the vietnam war they took over a bunch of refugees from vietnam of this group and there you could get your paperwork fast-tracked. If you were family or somehow somehow connected, uh, as a refugee, if you were connected to the military, cia or usa, and he was connected to. He worked for a family friend, worked for usa id. So usa id, which we know is a soft power arm of the cia, the non-bullets arm, the non-torture part of the cia, brought her dad over to the united states. So the cia brought her dad over and now she's a democrat rep saying I'm not legal, trying to weaponize that whole storyline when entering candidate.
Speaker 3:Much what I mean. You just, you just like, I'm sure. In reality you had, no, your dad just had a job and it's just. You know, whatever. But can you see how we, the people, get a little suspect here? Yeah, like whenever I see usaID now I'm just like CIA. Yeah, potentially bad, very bad. So I don't know, I'm just, I'm just saying I'm not making any allegations. Even I would be way beyond that. I would never do that. Ok, this right here. Are you ready to have your mind absolutely blown? You ready for the answer that has eluded us? Because it was just so simple that all of our forefathers understood this intuitively?
Speaker 3:the answer 27 no okay, this is, this is even better the answer is literally nothing.
Speaker 3:oh, okay, because we have to sometimes resist the urge to do something or put labels on things or change for change's sake, and sometimes you just got to be clear eyed about things. So there's this whole. By the way, my friend Earl right, he's getting out and he's been saying this, like psychiatry is best up, like it's just. He's just so beside himself that he was in prison for 43 months pre-trial while they determined if he was competent or not, all based on subjective factors. Okay, so this is Tucker Carlson interviewing a doctor, or, excuse me, laura Delano, who was labeled bipolar for life after one session. Okay so this listen to this. This is pretty incredible.
Speaker 8:Can you imagine telling a 14 year old you have a lifelong illness from which you will never recover? That will define you going forward at 14. You're telling somebody that on the basis of what evidence that will define you going forward At 14, you're telling somebody that On the basis of what evidence? Where did you catch this illness? In the ladies' room in an airport? Did they explain where you got this illness?
Speaker 14:It's a very good question, tucker, and it's a question that we should be asking all the time about literally every single psychiatric diagnosis that is ever given to any human being, because the entire model is built on subjectivity. It's built on the subjective observations of the diagnosing clinician, which of course means it will be infused by their own personality, like whether they had a bad night's sleep, they just had a fight with their spouse an hour earlier and they're grumpy. You know it's going to infuse how they see their patients. There are no objective biological tests. There are no brain scans, lab tests that you can do to say, oh this is proof that you have this, you know, chemical imbalance in your brain or this, you know, faulty biomarker. There's no objective, measurable pathology of any kind in in any of these conditions literally all of them, including the so-called serious ones like bipolar and schizophrenia.
Speaker 8:It is completely based on observation but is there any explanation for so? If so, they're telling you they're looking forward in to the next 70 years of your life and saying it's going to be with you forever. Kind of incumbent on them to explain where you got this thing. It's nature, like what exactly are they talking about? Did anybody ever explain any of that?
Speaker 14:No, and in large part because I never asked. I mean, of course I didn't ask as a kid. I was just so flummoxed by the whole and disoriented by this whole experience that it didn't even occur to me to be like. Can you prove that I have an incurable brain disease? But honestly, talk to her.
Speaker 8:I'm sorry, laura, to say you have terminal cancer. We can keep you alive for decades, but it's terminal. I mean, that's like so nuts to say that to a child on the base of no evidence, like and then to medicate them, and then to medicate them, yeah right, and then to put stigma on them.
Speaker 3:Oh, you have some condition that's purely based on subjective.
Speaker 4:You know like, yeah, so, because we now know it's all subjective and never mind that all these people that go into this profession almost all of them have personal messed up lives and they're trying to self-diagnose yeah so then you start projecting into others your own diagnoses.
Speaker 3:Yes, no, it's very, it's very freudian yeah this is? This is a thing like studying psychology, learning about the mind and the way things work. I mean, there's value to that, for sure. But at the same time. It's not medicine, it's not science, it's not objective. So because we now know it's all subjective, I am making the official clinical diagnosis based on subjective observation that the Democrat Party is officially retarded All right folks that's it for today. Don't forget to follow us on business perspective.
Speaker 3:All the shows, rumble, link, follow, like, share everything. This show grows because of you and we do it because of the three of you. Thank you so much. We love you guys. Don't forget to visit leftbehindwithoutorg and 1776 live. We are doing some amazing things over there with trust and real estate. We were looking at deals in missouri yesterday that were 85 000 for fix and flips. It's really awesome. So, anyways, take a look. We look forward to seeing you again. Oh, no show tomorrow. I will be gone tomorrow. No show tomorrow. I gotta go take care of a little court thing. No big deal, be back on thursday. So no show tomorrow. I will be gone tomorrow. No show tomorrow. I got to go take care of a little court thing. No big deal, be back on Thursday. So no show tomorrow, we'll be back on Thursday. Talk to you again Thursday.
Speaker 1:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What, I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that, eh by? How do you get that? Eh? By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress.
Speaker 1:There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 1:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then, who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 1:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Well, I can become king. Then.
Speaker 1:The lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it.
