Peasants Perspective

What They Won't Tell You About Recycling Will Make You Question Everything Else

Taylor Johnatakis Season 2 Episode 92

Send us a text

Ever wonder if your diligent recycling efforts actually matter? In this eye-opening episode, we pull back the curtain on America's recycling theater, where meticulously sorted waste ends up remixed in the same truck bound for landfills. This revelation serves as a powerful metaphor for widespread institutional deception.

The recycling facade is just the beginning. We dive into how social platforms censor discussions about faith and child protection, as evidenced by Sean Ryan's YouTube video with Jim Caviezel being removed for simply discussing Christianity and efforts to combat child trafficking. Meanwhile, Chris Cuomo, now freed from CNN's constraints, exposes the dark money behind supposedly grassroots protests across America, tracing funding back to Chinese interests engaged in what they call a "smokeless war" against Western democracy.

Most alarming is our examination of Israel's recent strikes against Iran, viewed through the lens of General Wesley Clark's revelation that Pentagon officials planned to take down seven specific Middle Eastern countries years ago - with Iran as the final target. Jeffrey Sachs warns that this progression threatens to escalate into a much broader conflict with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Throughout our discussion, a clear pattern emerges: when institutions lie about something as simple as recycling, it raises legitimate questions about their trustworthiness on matters of health, economics, and war. As one listener aptly commented, "If they can't tell the truth about recycling, don't even start talking about wars overseas."

This episode will transform how you process mainstream narratives. The revolution begins with recognizing these patterns of deception and reclaiming your independence from those who see ordinary citizens as mere "peasants" to be managed and controlled. Share this episode with someone whose eyes need opening.

Support the show

https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective

www.PeasantsPerspective.com

www.LeftBehindandWithout.org

www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ

www.DollarsVoteLouder.com

buymeacoffee.com/peasant

Speaker 1:

And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.

Speaker 2:

We're getting screwed man.

Speaker 3:

Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning peasants. We did it. Yes, we did it.

Speaker 4:

Yes, we're streaming everywhere. We don't have any problems. We got started on time.

Speaker 3:

It's AI, we're AI, we love it.

Speaker 4:

We're AI.

Speaker 3:

It's official uh to uh on. We've got a message on rumble. Still don't know you where you are.

Speaker 4:

On facebook, peasant's perspective same logo I don't know there, oh, maybe they just hate us that much see, we were so close, I told oh shoot today, I get the strobe effect while I mess with the lights.

Speaker 3:

I want you guys to watch this video we're going to start out today. I just want you guys again proper perspectives. I'm going to tell you some stories about what I found out about the trash system, but this is just. This is what we call endemic.

Speaker 4:

This is a chronic disease in america no we're doing so good for the first two seconds.

Speaker 3:

We started on time. We were like rocking there we go, okay.

Speaker 9:

Welcome to the progressive bastion of Marin County, california, where we environmentalists go out of our way to separate our refuse for a more sustainable planet. Residents can be fined up to $500 for not properly separating their trash. As you can see, the separating can be futile as all this trash is remixed in the truck and hauled to the landfill. This is at the end of Tiburon's Restaurant Row, where the restaurants diligently separate their waste into recyclables, compostables and common trash.

Speaker 9:

I witnessed bin after bin of meticulously sorted waste several tons worth dumped into the same truck, crushed and hauled away. Recycling is not specifically mentioned in the book, but rent-seeking is, and so is virtue signaling. Make sure you audit your own local trash and recycling facilities.

Speaker 4:

You may be shocked at what you find don't bother, you won't be shocked so I have to confess a sin uh-oh, uh-oh, did you throw something recyclable in the trash?

Speaker 3:

oh, my goodness, oh I figured out, in the state of washington we don't have landfills. Oh yeah, we ship it all down to oregon. Just washington just craps all over oregon, so we don't have landfills and uh. So I was kind of like finding out a little bit about recycling, because you've got this recycling program and some people are very intense about it.

Speaker 3:

You know they've got like glass and plastic and they do a very intense sorting and we have a special garbage can for recycling oh yeah, so you sort it and then you put it all into one can yeah well then I found out that 99 of it just gets thrown down to oregon in the landfill, just goes down against. There's no when they created the entire recycling program and everything.

Speaker 4:

There's no back end sorting or anything I think you must have been in prison when we figured this out oh no, I figured it out a decade ago, a decade ago.

Speaker 3:

So my recycling bin is the second trash can I get. I get one and a half things of trash a week. Every two weeks I get two cans and I just I throw, I just throw the kitchen trash in there. There's no attempt to hide the sorting whatsoever. I've been doing it for a decade. Ron, you know how many times a recycling guy said anything Zero, zero, because they just throw it in the thing and it's gone. It goes to the transfer station, it's loaded in with the trash. It's the same company, it's the whole same thing.

Speaker 4:

So I'm like not, and every now and then you'll hear well, there's one like trash route where they sort out the metal and send it to china on a bar just like okay, well, that's because timmy's collecting the cash yeah, and then the other thing I found out too was the way they do it.

Speaker 3:

Is they? They actually don't sort it before they get on the barge? The chinese will buy a batch of recycling yeah, oh yeah so it's not that they're getting all your recycling, it's every now and then they'll buy, uh, some containers worth of garbage, of recycled like alleged recycling. They take it on their barge and they take it across the pacific and along the way they do the sorting and they get there. They have precisely what they need and nothing left on the barge that they didn't need. Where did it go? Where?

Speaker 4:

did it go, Ron? Well, there's a new island next to Hawaii.

Speaker 3:

Yes, exactly, and we're like stop, you know, no plastic straws because of sea turtle. Meanwhile, the Chinese are out there there sorting and just chucking it over the edge like it's complete utter disregard.

Speaker 4:

I think some of those boats have bottoms that just open up and here's the thing ron's worked at sea.

Speaker 3:

People who work at sea have zero regard for the bottom of the ocean. Toss things over the edge like nothing.

Speaker 4:

I'm not admitting to anything. It's totally illegal.

Speaker 3:

I remember floating down the Columbia with you that day one Okay.

Speaker 4:

You'll notice. I don't know if you've noticed this yet, but around my office there are zero trash cans. They are all recycle cans have you noticed. That's because I recycle everything back to mother earth. We're the closest of people. Don't worry about it that much. Oh my goodness. You know recycling is really only a good idea if it makes sense economically. You know. Like aluminum, you know, makes sense. Almost everything else does not make sense.

Speaker 3:

Plastic does not make sense you should really recycle it locally. You know, and I'm really concerned, I'm super concerned about plastics at this point, the whole microplastic situation, like I think that's one of those it's going to really hurt the human race yeah, really we should get away from packaging anything that you consume in plastic ever which is so much. I mean even there's a liner inside the yes, cans, you know it's like it's, it's, it is truly in everything yes, it's everywhere, but it is something that I yes, it's everywhere.

Speaker 4:

But it is something that I'm very concerned with. I think I've heard on Rogan once that he said that he'd heard that the average American consumes like a credit card worth of plastic every year.

Speaker 3:

In micro-dose, in micro-plastic form.

Speaker 4:

And that's not good for your system? No, no, not at all. There's endocrine disruptors and all kinds of other problems. Yep, so this next video.

Speaker 3:

So there's another one of those situations where the government sets up, a situation where they've got fines, like if you get caught putting something in the wrong thing and Karen calls on you you could get an actual ticket Meanwhile. You see that.

Speaker 4:

Let the gaslighting continue.

Speaker 3:

Let the gaslighting continue. Let the gaslighting continue. Listen when you see it. You can't unsee it, despite all our best intentions, despite all the narrative on big picture why we do certain things. Recycling conceptually great idea, yeah, wow, amazing. But if there's no back in, this is the government specialty. This is what they do, like they're not a business. They are a business technically, but they're not a business.

Speaker 4:

Right. And the trash is just one department.

Speaker 3:

There's no accountability. Yeah, it's a jobs program. You know what I mean. Like and think about the contract, those bins. You know that they had the Obama trash cans that we have here in Kingston. They put them all over the country. You know I'm talking about the solar ones.

Speaker 4:

Yep, that don't work. Yep, five thousand dollars a pop, oh, they're more than that, more than that.

Speaker 3:

What are they? You don't want to know. Like I heard I maybe it was five thousand dollars for just like the, some piece of it or something that's probably just like the liner, because they're like 25 grand are, are they? They're freaking expensive. I know that, like you know, they build a public restroom and I mean those things are a million bucks and you're like, what the fuck? Yeah, where did the million dollars go?

Speaker 4:

It must have went to the design and planning.

Speaker 3:

It's like concrete formed to the roof. Like what?

Speaker 4:

There must be $500,000 worth of graffiti in here.

Speaker 3:

It's for the art value. Yeah, all right. So this is Sean Ryan, this next video, and again. So, just in another episode of hey, listen, what you see is not what you think, right? So, sean Ryan, he's kind of come on the scene to podcasting yeah, he's strong.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, he was a former navy seal. Then he went down, became a cia contractor. Then he became a drug kingpin in columbia and bounced around to a couple other countries, found jesus came home. Now he's got a podcast. I'm sure there were some steps in between yeah and uh seems like you know, he gets really good people on. I've enjoyed listening to a couple of them. It's kind of fun to have. Like you know, he gets really good people on.

Speaker 12:

I've enjoyed listening to a couple of them.

Speaker 3:

It's kind of fun to have a new, you know, rogan-esque type person, you know. So anyways, he did a video with John Caviezel you know John Caviezel the actor in Jesus, jesus yeah. He's also in Count of Monte Cristo and many other things. I've still never seen the Passion of Christ.

Speaker 4:

I haven't either, yeah. Anyways the someday.

Speaker 3:

I was on. I was in Brazil when it came out.

Speaker 4:

I've heard you did a great job, yep.

Speaker 3:

So, anyways, he also came out a couple of summers ago with, uh, the child trafficking video, what was it called? Um? Uh no, no freedom. Oh yeah. And anyway, so he had him on and they talked about it. So this is what happened to sean ryan, and you and I had something happen very similar to us with spotify. Oh, yeah, right, remember when our entire account got deleted? Yep, all right.

Speaker 12:

So this is what happened to him statement on how youtube pulled my episode with jim caviezel. I took that statement down because I let my emotions get the best of me and I spoke out of pure rage and I shouldn't have. So here it is. Yesterday, youtube pulled my episode with Jim Caviezel. We talked about two things on there. We talked about faith in Jesus Christ and we talked about saving children from sex trafficking and sex exploitation. I put in for a manual review. They still denied it and they pulled the episode. It will not be on YouTube. Apple Podcasts and Spotify still support me. You can find the episode there. We will be posting the episode to X or Twitter on SeanRyan762 later this week. I just want to say I never thought I would live in a time where talking about faith in Jesus Christ and saving kids from sexual predators is strictly forbidden. It's a very sad day and if you supported that, you should be ashamed of yourself. Yesterday I made a statement on how YouTube youtube pulled. There's got to be a way to stop the auto playback.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, never mind, we're talking about a pretty important topic I told people like the serious and then the giggles again. We had a similar thing. We talked about similar topic. Yeah, faith, right and and all of a sudden boom right, we made a couple dot connections and wham our entire catalog, the whole library and we were a hundred plus a couple hundred episodes deep I don't remember, but it was a lot just gone yeah, right so yeah, I'm sean, glad, glad you joined us.

Speaker 3:

Um, you know your trajectory. Welcome to the club. Your trajectory should be serving prison time about 2027. You know, I'm sure you'll offend some more powers that be, but this is the path we walk and then, about six months after that, you'll have about 20 followers.

Speaker 4:

So here's the.

Speaker 3:

In a world that we live in, democratized information now right Shows the big cable shows are much smaller. Lots of our listeners get most of their news through social media, through this podcast and other places like that. You know it's very democratized, which is excellent, but you still have gatekeepers. Youtube Then, when YouTube had it was almost a monopoly on video, play videos right. Then here comes in rumble and creates a secondary space, but rumble also has some censorship soft spots right.

Speaker 3:

So you kind of have to play them off each other a little bit. That's an. X is much more liberal, but X also seems to shadow, to shadow ban, I mean but what does that even mean?

Speaker 4:

play them off each other because it's, like you know, shouldn't? Aren't you allowed to just like say what you want?

Speaker 3:

I mean, well, what I'm saying is you've got like some people will go down, like they're not going to offend the the rumble sensors, right, so rumbles they I got free speech because you just don't talk about the things they censor and same thing you could go down on on youtube and but at the same time you know it's like that's why you got to have multiple places is if I guess that you've also got pillnet, which we need to start streaming on that here pretty soon.

Speaker 3:

I know heather's going to be like thank you, it's called pillnet. They came out during COVID and just as a completely free speech platform. They used to be some type of gaming or something like that, you know, like a Twitch streamer, but they basically just opened up their platform and said everybody come here. So a lot of the people that got banned when Trump got banned from Twitter, that had shows and you know they moved to Pilt, moved to Gab, all these different places. You've got Getter, truce, I mean the.

Speaker 4:

The landscape has completely changed I guess what I'm saying is that we talk about constantly that we're you know, we live in america free speech, but we constantly talk about how we self-censor and how we talk around topics so that we can get them on air.

Speaker 3:

It's madness and thus is the burden. I mean, listen, the greatest people who have attacked systems have attacked it through myth, storytelling. You know what I mean? Parable, that's the, that's the, that's the stuff that's really hard to censor.

Speaker 4:

It's also really hard to censor the zeitgeist is that why jesus spoke parables, so he was canceled in parables.

Speaker 3:

That's why I ran spoken parables. That's why, uh, um, cs lewis and jr tolkien and um, I always, I always want to. There's some george orwell. I always want to know orson hyde who wrote 1984. There's a small niche of people who know that's so funny. For some reason I was confused orwell with orson hyde. This is really silly association. But I've done that for 20 years, like somewhere in college. I have like two books in my bag.

Speaker 4:

That's funny, anyways, okay.

Speaker 3:

Okay so, but you know they talk in parable, they talk in story pageantry um that, those and ideas last right, that's the thing.

Speaker 4:

Are we going to have to do that from now on? That's a high skill level okay I was like I'll use short and now we might have to shut the show down because I'm not sure we can do it every day is like a fairy tale.

Speaker 3:

One day there was a country called israeli land that bombed iran land.

Speaker 4:

I don't know all right. So that's that bombed iran land, I don't know, bloatotopia all right.

Speaker 3:

So that's one thing. They lie to you about. The recycling they lie to you about, you know, free speech and and and. Oh, this is a platform where you can share your ideas. Yeah, unless it's protecting kids or jesus like tendered subjects. Come on, join our group. We're all inclusive yeah, exactly.

Speaker 3:

So there was a. There was a congressional hearing yesterday that was between josh hall it was you know senate but josh holly spoke and they had the 23 and me company president up there. Now 23 and me went bankrupt and now they're selling the company to a chinese company who's going to get all the data. Well, they've said, oh, you can delete your data. The customer has control.

Speaker 3:

Josh Hawley, five minutes of this, right. He gets up and he's like reads the terms of service. He's like stop talking to the attorneys behind the men in suits. Answer my question Can people delete their DNA data? Can they do this? He says, yes, they can. Then he reads the terms of service no, they can't. And then he basically gets to this point but this is the end of the exchange. So they've been going back. Josh Hawley has read him the riot act, read him his terms of service, really put them in his place. The guy just keeps wanting to say but they can control their data, like it's a talking point. Okay, so this is, uh, the finish of that. And I this is funny I was alone in my house and my house I live in a log cabin, so it's pretty sound bad. Like you can, if you make, if your the house is quiet, you make noise, like in one part of the house behind three walls you can hear it in the other part of the house. It's drafty?

Speaker 14:

it's really not, but it just has a part of the house.

Speaker 3:

It's drafty it's really not, but it just has a weird sound acoustics when it's so. Anyways, I'm alone in my room and I'm listening to this in my earbuds and at the very end, you guys are going to clap too. I started cheering and clapping Like like I was a sports fan. At that moment, my father-in-law walked into the house and could, it could hear me and I didn't hear him.

Speaker 10:

He was like kind of scared like what's happening you know. So, anyways, this is fun to delete permanently their data. And when you said a minute ago to senator moody, at all times consumers have complete control of their data, that's just not true. Is it by the terms of your own agreement?

Speaker 5:

that just is not true senator, with all due respect, all of the genetic data is deleted.

Speaker 10:

we are only. With all due respect, what you are telling me is in direct contravention to what your own policy states, even if you choose to delete your account. In fact, what you do is you allow your consumers to delete their account settings, but their data isn't deleted. You still have it. The laboratory still has it. You have their name, you have their date of birth, you have their sex and now you're going to sell it. Here's my point. It's a pattern. Your consumers actually aren't in control of anything. You are. You control their data. You control their data. You control their genetic information. Now you're about to sell it. You promise them we won't ever sell it without your consent, but you're doing it. You promise them we'll allow you to delete it, but you don't. In fact you've lied to them, have you not, senator?

Speaker 10:

we have not. I assure you that we are deleting all of our customers who have requested it. No, you're not. You're not because your policies say they're not and you're not deleting it because, if you were, your company wouldn't be worth $300 million. No, don't read from what your guy behind you is shoveling talking points to you. Now I don't want your talking points. I've read your policies, I've seen what they are and I tell you what it's amazing to me. You're not getting your socks sued off by your customers. I hope they will. I hope they will rush to the courthouse, even as we are here today, to sue you into oblivion.

Speaker 3:

That's what I was like yeah, yeah, yeah, go get it, sue you to oblivion. Oh brother. Hey you, okay, I was like, yeah, I'm good.

Speaker 4:

I think it's so ridiculous all of a sudden, yeah well, just just him sitting there and being like, oh no, we deleted all the data. Then what the hell are you selling? You know, yeah, if you've got no data to sell.

Speaker 3:

What the hell are you selling? I got some email addresses, deleted accounts. This is scary, this is truly scary. Like you go down the biomedical rabbit hole and the, the, the viruses and the genetic modification and you just are like, is there hope? I mean, that's something we don't, we touch on briefly, because it's kind of like, oh, that's the end of the world, right there, like at that point, I hope I hope your parents taught them well, they can you know, but like it's bad news bears, they get your genetic code. They could release a virus that is designed to infect the entire population but only kill you. Yeah, you know, I mean the, the ability to to. I mean to. I mean hitler would have just had a heyday here with this, because you genetically just go out and kill whole genotypes and things well.

Speaker 4:

You wouldn't need to round anybody up then, would you?

Speaker 3:

no, I. I mean, you're moving into a realm, a world that's scary. So, 23 and me gathering that genetic data so you can be like I'm from north england, you know, and I'm one percent african like okay, wow, that's really valuable information. It is cool I I've many times. I would love to get that data and I'd love to. Like you know, my uncle sent one off to another different university that sent him like 20,000 data points back, told him what his favorite food was.

Speaker 3:

It was incredible, but it's all just for funsies, it's not for funsies, yeah, but but you're selling to the Chinese, like Wuhan, I mean hello.

Speaker 3:

So, yeah, I hope people sue them and I hope something happens there. This is what gives rise to totalitarianism. This is what gives rise to governments infringing on property rights is stupid stuff like that. Because at a certain point they go no, I can't do it. Sorry, you can't sell that factory, it's too important, too big to fail. Bank can't fall right when you, when you go against free trade and then you have to start fair trade.

Speaker 3:

Because the moment you I was just explaining this to my daughter and all her friends at the dinner table last night, the moment and the father-in-law was there too the moment you introduce a single regulation into the mix, you no longer have a discussion about free trade. You have to have a discussion about fair trade, because if I get taxed as a laborer, because I'm a citizen, but you as an illegal, do not, right, you have an advantage in your bargaining. So now it's not a free bargain of labor, we have to discuss fairness. Okay, if you're not legal, at least pay the taxes. So now it's not a free bargain of labor. We have to discuss fairness, okay, well, okay, if you're not legal, at least pay the taxes. So now we're trying to get to a fairness. So now we, now that it's fair, we can be free, do you see what I'm saying? And you go down that road and pretty soon you have situations like this where well, the law says we can sell it to whoever. Do we want to sell it to our mortal enemy? I guess that already released a bioweapon on us, intentionally or unintentionally.

Speaker 3:

Same effect, right, right, don't play with fire, kids. You know what I mean? Well, dad, I was just playing. You burnt the house down. It was all for funsies, but you burnt the house down. You know what I mean. Like, but you burnt the house down. Yeah, I don't care if the boot's coming from the right or left. You got it on my throat, take it off. You know, I do worry a lot about dictatorship and totalitarianism coming from the right. I worry about it a lot because it's, it's uh, I don't know do you think trump is our new king?

Speaker 3:

then I'm way beyond that I know I'm just saying that's what the left wants to sell.

Speaker 15:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 3:

And the thing is it's a valid concern. Listen, I genuinely am afraid of the far right equally as I'm afraid of the far left, in fact. I almost might go to say I'm more afraid of the far left or more of the far right. Yes, more afraid of the far right.

Speaker 14:

Right.

Speaker 3:

Because at least with the far left you can assimilate. When the far right moves into like ethno state territory, you can't assimilate. You can't change your skin color uniform, you can't change your eye color. You can't change your, your tattoos or your. You know what I mean. I can't change the religion that you were born as or like all of a sudden, like that's where the far right kind of freaks me out a little bit. On the far left, if you're willing to abandon it and assimilate, you're usually pretty good. You couldn't really like be a negro in berlin circa 1943. You know what I mean. Like it wasn't going to work out for you. I mean, it was hard enough being a white Jew, you know like. So they at least could like sometimes pretend. You know what I'm saying.

Speaker 3:

So I'm afraid of it and I understand why the left wants to prick at the heartstrings of fear of that, because we have the Holocaust as this huge example of the thing, the holocaust as this huge example of the thing. There's other, better examples, like you know what they did in ukraine under soviet union, or maybe the armenian genocide of christians, or, you know, maybe we could talk about a couple other ones that have sure but the holocaust is a really good example because even kids today they don't even really know what's going on there.

Speaker 4:

I mean a lot of. I was surprised that a lot of kids don't even believe in the holocaust. Yeah, but they don't even really know what's going on there. I mean a lot of. I was surprised that a lot of kids don't even believe in the Holocaust.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, but they don't even at least they're talking about it, whereas nobody talks about, like the Armenian genocide.

Speaker 4:

Well, yeah, that's why I said it's a good example, because at least it's something that people will talk about, at least are aware that it happened, and it's something to discuss.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, like, like, yeah, precisely, precisely. Okay, so in other, hey, look, these guys lied to you. Here is chris, which I find hilarious. So you know, cnn just lying to you narrative, selling like complete it's the clown show, clown show yeah got fired. You know I've got covid, I'm on lockdown. He's out in the park. You know, the whole thing's just total. He's got his brother on, he's got the giant cotton swab like it's just a complete production yeah ratings go down, loses credibility.

Speaker 3:

Now he's on his own, he's on news nation, but of course he's got a rolodex of people he knows, so he has people on the show and you know whatever, he's gone and met with steve bannon and things, and and this is happening as people leave the plantation and they come off the teleprompter and they start doing a little bit of journalism because that's the only thing you can do, right? And and guys like him are now coming around and they're like, oh hey, I was. Oh yeah, looking at this, imagine Chris Cuomo four or five years ago, during 2020, when we're talking about BLM riots and Antifa riots around the country, clearly funded all the same things.

Speaker 3:

He was all the same people, all in social movement.

Speaker 4:

He was drunk on the Kool-Aid not on the dole.

Speaker 3:

He's not at a usaid funded outlet or infiltrated outlet, right? I have no idea what news nation's funding or anything looks like, but either way, point is the same. Now he's got to go out and actually fight for viewers, and the only way you can do that is really. Tests are fed by dark, really good narrative. So here he is talking about the riot. The riots, dark funding this. There's a longer clip where he goes on you're being lied to, they're lying to you and it's like it's freaking hilarious.

Speaker 3:

Hello, welcome to the show, sean. It's good to have you. Chris, it's good to have you. I'm always looking. I've said this so many times as I went through this whole j6 experience. They I want my prosecutor to go to jail. The judge and I was like, hold your horses, hold your horses, hold your horses. You know, you guys are all christian. You guys all claim to believe the bible. Well, believe it. Don't believe in it. Believe it. Okay, you need to leave room in your heart for the souls of the world that persecute the saints, that stone them, that set up the martyrdoms to have a conversion, to have the scales pulled from their eyes and then become to repent. Paul paul was equally zealous when he was saw and he took that zealotry and redirected it properly. We need some of those zealots.

Speaker 3:

We need some of these people to become forces for good. So welcome to the club. I'm glad the scales have come off your eyes a little bit we're still watching you sideways you know, everybody needs to watch. Me too. I openly admit listen. Every now and then we play a story or a video. It's wrong.

Speaker 4:

I forget to correct it, you know but we also look at elon and trump sideways too a little bit we look at everybody's side.

Speaker 3:

I look at my phone sideways. Yeah, I question my own motives all the time. Use some side eye right now. All right. So here's chris cuomo having the up, telling you the truth about the riots, these protests are fed by dark sources with a desire for our destruction.

Speaker 15:

One of the main players in organizing and funding the Los Angeles protests is a group called CHIRLA, c-h-i-r-l-a acronym Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights. They have received millions in government grants and state grants, but now reports are showing that there may be a foreign link, specifically from China, funding and organizing these protests.

Speaker 18:

The pro.

Speaker 15:

Chinese far left party for socialism and liberation. They're known as a PSL. Left Party for Socialism and Liberation they're known as a PSL. They are working with Chirla helping fund the protests in Los Angeles and maybe elsewhere. Remember, all the parties in China are controlled by the CCP. So this is China and the party is pushing to destroy capitalism and the West. This is its agenda. This is what China wants. They even have a term for the effort. It's called the smokeless war, where they have this theory of how they'll destroy the West without actually taking to the battlefield. That's what they did during the anti-Israel campus protests.

Speaker 15:

The PSL worked hand in glove with anti-Zionist student groups and helped organize and fund the Columbia campus encampments. Now it gets scarier. Where does the PSL get its money? Enter Shanghai-based socialist billionaire Neville Singham. 2017. He sold his tech company for about a billion, reports show. The same year, he started funding far-left groups like the PSL to the tune of millions. Singham is not America's friend. He has deep business ties to the CCP, but also has strong ideological ties to communism period. People who worked for him says he's an admirer of Mao, che Guevara, hugo Chavez, not friends of American culture. According to the New York Times, singham has funded and developed a deep global empire of pro-China nonprofits in the media and grassroots political space, steering millions into these groups over the years, including the PSL. And guess who was associated with the PSL and other Singham-funded groups? With the PSL and other Singham-funded groups, elias Rodriguez, ring a bell. This scumbag, the 30-year-old Chicago man who murdered two Israeli staffers in cold blood last month to make a political point.

Speaker 3:

Welcome to the club, Chris.

Speaker 4:

Wow, I was going to ask if that was AI, but clearly not.

Speaker 3:

No, that's a show. So the dc street shooter is being was part of the same organization that's funding all these riots breaking out across the country. They're not organic.

Speaker 4:

They're not organic at all I'm so glad we have a new acronym.

Speaker 3:

We need to remember I know, I know I get all riled up when they come and make drug busts. In my neighborhood this happened. You know. Again, the the the zeitgeist right now is riot, riot, riot. They're deporting good, honest Home Depot workers Guys. I don't know if that's the case or not, I don't know. I don't really care. The price you pay when you get out of law and order, then the pendulum has to come back. Hard decisions have to be made, right it's? It's not easy to do this. It's not easy to do this. All we want to adjudicate every case and find out to keep the good ones and let the good ones go. Okay, do you have a way to do that in 12 to 24 months for 15 million people?

Speaker 3:

no no, okay, and have you ever considered the fact and this is one of the things that people that aren't touched by this I hired people out of the home depot parking lot. I told this story and what did that do to me?

Speaker 4:

it burned me bad I saw some comment somewhere this morning that said I can't remember who was doing it, but they were giving ice agents.

Speaker 3:

Judicial authority well, they already.

Speaker 4:

They don't know about judicial authority, but they already have administrative authority to hold court right, but it was some kind of a judicial authority like this was going to be the way that they were going to process people.

Speaker 3:

They're just going to have oh yeah, no, that's they started about a while ago. They're going to ramp it up like more of these administrative judges for these asylum cases specifically.

Speaker 3:

So yeah, that's, that's the the process they would follow. But you know, I know, for me when I see a drug bust going on in my neighborhood, I always assume it's, you know, just taking out innocent people and I always try to protest and riot and cause a big scene. You know this happened in uh pennell county and the sheriff is clowning the protesters. Take a listen to this everyone. This is different than the one in la that started the riot. So now this is starting to be a trend.

Speaker 3:

Anytime law enforcement goes out to do their thing and they do a raid or a drug, everybody assumes now it's like an immigration bust and and don't forget like, like 90% of the US's population lives within 100 miles of a coastline or a border, which means you're in both ICE and Border Patrol's primary jurisdiction area. So they absolutely would be participating in any drug bust. They would be. If it has any connection to border activity or customs, they're there right, they would absolutely be involved.

Speaker 17:

So just because you see an ice van or a border patrol van does not mean it's a deportation raid yesterday my detectives were serving a search warrant on a cartel member where they took all of this drugs off the streets. We've got fentanyl pills, we've got cocaine, we got methamphetamines. We got gun seeds from this cartel member. Here's the crazy part Some idiots, thinking it was an ice rake, came down and protested. You want to protest this? Not getting off the streets? That's insane. Stay out of Pinal County if you're going to commit crime.

Speaker 17:

And I really want to thank my anti-smuggling unit for this long investigation. This was over a half a year investigation where they got 32 pounds of cocaine off the street and 22 pounds of methamphetamines off the street, to include the fentanyl pills. Thanks guys, You're doing a great job keeping the county safe. Hey everyone, hey everyone.

Speaker 4:

Is he from Texas? Yeah, pinal County, texas. Yeah.

Speaker 1:

Pinell County, texas. Yes, I could tell, because he was talking about the cocaine in pounds, not kilos.

Speaker 3:

He's not from Columbia. Pray the rosary daily. Anyone can have the Saul to Paul moment. Pray for it, yes, and for us. We have to be open to this. We have to be open to allow our persecutors to eventually become our comrades Comrades, I would use our friends, associates, fellow saints, brothers and sisters in the family in the church of Christ.

Speaker 3:

Whatever you want. However you want to visualize that or conceptualize it, the idea is people do have turnings. I mean, tucker Carlson's been one. I've been impressed. You know Tucker's always, you know he's doing his thing. There's a Black Mirror episode on Netflix where the guy they're in like this controlled little dystopian future environment where nobody has their own opinion about anything.

Speaker 3:

They're all busy riding a bike, making electricity, watching TV. So, anyways, and he starts to rage because he sees the futility of the system. So, anyways, and he starts to rage because he sees the futility of the system, and so the system, kind of, he starts to get people to like stop doing their daily tasks. And so the system comes to him and they're like oh, here's the deal, you can live this great life with not having to ride and have all the money credits you need, and you can even get on the show for an hour a week and rage. He gets on for an hour a day and he rages, rage, rage, rage. And meanwhile people are riding their bike. Yeah, that's so frustrating, yeah. And as soon as the show goes over, next show comes on and they're onto the next thing and he just becomes part of the, the tying in. You know what?

Speaker 4:

I mean.

Speaker 3:

And so I viewed Tucker Carlson a little bit like that, the sean hannity a little bit like that. Justice is coming, you know, night after night they're just pitching, whatever the narrative is. Well, tucker carlson, clearly, when he left fox news um, he's got a lot better. I mean he's way broader topics. I mean he was with ron johnson, a sitting senator, talking about building seven of 9-11. Thank you, thank you. Okay, I had my dad's become super open to this, by the way, we had a discussion about, oh, no he was like.

Speaker 3:

I sent him a picture where it's like building sevens over here and he's like yeah, it's yeah. I mean it's like I know, they can't even tell us the truth about recycling. You think they're going to tell the truth about that, are you just make the connection?

Speaker 4:

yet they can't even tell the truth about recycling I love it when people go well, it does make you think it does make you think.

Speaker 3:

It does make you think, yeah, it really does keep thinking. Now, the other thing you're going to be seeing is you've got, uh, senator padilla, who's from took. Whose place did he take? He took Kamala Harris's place, so he's the other senator from California.

Speaker 4:

Okay.

Speaker 3:

So Senator Padilla goes down to California, to where Kristi Noem is holding a press conference, he rushes in, rushes to the stage, starts yelling at her because you know you're deporting our community members, blah, whatever. And christy gnome doesn't know who he is, because why would she care? Yeah, she doesn't recognize him off the top of his head. You don't know who he is.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, get that crazy guy out here he's yelling and he's not wearing a senate pin or anything, and so the security is like stop, and they push him back, and then he turns, and then he aggressively comes.

Speaker 3:

So then now they're like taking him out this secret service, okay, takes him out into the hallway, puts him on the ground. He tells him they just sent it. At that point they're like okay, shut up, sit down. You know, we got to figure this out. You just tried to rush a cabinet member. Yeah, right, put handcuffs on him, then he identifies himself. Things settle down, take the handcuffs, it's over. So here's the scene. Now he came after I can't believe I was arrested and the imagery of him being pushed down by FBI and, you know, ice or whatever, the back of their how about?

Speaker 4:

I can't believe you're retarded, bro. Exactly.

Speaker 3:

So CNN immediately wanted to come out and make this thing. So much stuff happened yesterday. So much stuff. So there's a lot of things that were consequential that are just lost in the news cycle. They're going to be lost, so we're trying before we get to the big one, like the big bombs. I want to cover some of these things. Yesterday I clipped off the end of the show and it was all my iran segments and it ended up being a big old fat hello, we're not going to get to him again if we don't keep going, okay, so?

Speaker 3:

this is. Cnn tried to make a thing out of this and they had their little legal analysts on and you can see the video here, but he pretty much broke it down. So this should be the beginning and the end of it as far as him being a martyr, but he should probably also be charged, okay point.

Speaker 18:

This is a federal building. You can't just, you know, wander uh in there. What reporting do you have? And how do you, how should we, in your view, be analyzing how we're seeing these agents respond? Well, it's it's easy to think about this as one incident, but actually, from a law enforcement perspective, we're really looking at three separate incidents that happened within a short period of time.

Speaker 18:

First, you have the DHS secretary who is addressing the press this was not a Q&A period and she's interrupted. She's interrupted by someone who was speaking very loudly and so her security detail confronts what we obviously now know to be the senator, and at that point he is now going to be escorted out. You can't interrupt something like that that's already in progress without having those consequences. But the second incident, in my view, happens the moment as officers are trying to lead him out. He then turns and walks back towards, kind of into those agents. At that point, from a security detail perspective, we're taking this person out against their will. We've asked the person and, again, this is all happening very quickly. But the moment he then turns into them, they realize this is not someone who is going to comply.

Speaker 3:

So that's the scene, you know, he gets arrested. So that should be like the beginning and the end of it. But of course it's all political theater. So you know, oh my gosh, if they can do this to me, they can do it to you.

Speaker 4:

And it's like they're they're rushing now to become martyrs okay, like you guys want to rush some other cabinet member at some press event, you're gonna get the same treatment dummies.

Speaker 3:

Okay, pray for the rosary daily.

Speaker 3:

And he, uh, can't tell the truth about recycling. It's so funny, it's so true, yes, yes. If you can't tell the truth about recycling, don't even start talking about wars overseas. Let's start with. Jordan. Peterson says it best Make your bed, stop.

Speaker 3:

In his book Bringing order out of chaos. One of the rules for life is make your bed. And then he goes on to explain as he talks to college kids. He's like listen, you know you don't go. Think you're going to solve the complex things of the economy if it's even possible for one person to grasp all the nuanced and things of the economy if you can't even make your bed in the morning, yeah.

Speaker 3:

So, yes, if you can't even tell the truth about recycling, like, hey, we should just flood our city councils. If you've got a recycling program in your city council, you should follow the trash right and make sure it's actually being recycled. Otherwise, you should go to your town council and repeal all the laws for not sorting your trash, yeah, or doing it correctly. And or petition a sheriff to charge whoever's running those departments with those tickets and citations. Yeah, right, we're either. As pray. The rosary daily says nobody is above the law, right, you don't get to do it either. I mean, the only thing we allow them to do that we don't allow for ourselves is the is the monopoly on force to be to take up, to take first blow. That's the only thing that allegedly we have delegated to them, right, but we still maintain the right to defend ourselves.

Speaker 3:

You can't start to fight, but you can finish it. I did find that fascinating in prison when I was in prison. You know it's the whole. You don't start a thing like. There's some cameras. So if you got in a fight and you didn't start it, you definitely wanted to be on camera because you could finish that fight. Ah, it didn't matter if all the person did was do a little head butt or a shoulder butt, but if they made contact first, you could finish that fight and you might not go to the hole. Anyways, yeah, all right. And of, hey, if they can't lie to you about, if they can't tell the truth about recycling. Well, did anybody question covid? This is Jimmy Dorn.

Speaker 2:

I mean, it happened and I couldn't believe it, right. So when I I took the Moderna vaccine, I got vaccine injured. People told me to shut up about it, not talk about it. When I looked into it, I found out we were being lied to about everything. They lied about masks, they lied about herd immunity, they lied about natural immunity, they lied about transmission, they lied about contraction. There wasn't a thing they didn't lie about. And the thing is that that's why they told you please don't do your own research, because if you did, you'd find out that this was a big scam and everybody was lying to you about it from start to finish. The average age of death from uh covet in the united states 82 years old. The average life expectancy in the united states is 77. So if you get coveted you get five more years. That's what it looks like to me. So uh, this was, there wasn't a thing they didn't lie about. And then covet happened and I could that's right.

Speaker 3:

If you make your bed, your room is 80% clean. That's true, all right. So, covid right, same thing, lying liars, lying again. Yeah. Okay, and yeah, he's like if you do your own research, yeah, if you're doing research, we've already. We've already beat that horse to death.

Speaker 3:

But recycling, wait until you find out where they come up with your codes well, you only have to do about two minutes of research too I've told you, I've sat in the room with the guy that said that came up with why we have to have our septics 100 feet from the well, oh, it's like. Well, somebody did a study that was really good. It was 20 feet and then we thought, well, let's double it. And then we thought, well, let's triple it. And then we just rounded it out to 100.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, it's like there are building sites that can't be built on because they can't meet those setbacks that you just pulled out of your batukas right. You know, you complain about the, the best accepted science, and you're like and can I review that so I can comprehend it? No, where does it come from?

Speaker 4:

nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope yeah, we constantly have things like critical areas that have buffers in that that are updated all the time. They always change the number, but the science doesn't change. No, it's like, well, and then they just go well, best available science, and it's like, but it was the same science, yeah, but now it's the best available yeah, it's best available.

Speaker 3:

Okay, okay, it's the best money numbers are changing. The best money could buy. We got all the answers we needed so how come the buffer's getting bigger? Stop asking questions, yeah rural, pastoral, rural pastoral landscape. That's the goal. More buffers, please, yes, okay. So now we're moving on. Yep to the big deal the iran show okay, so last night israel took preemptive strike at Iran.

Speaker 4:

All right, this is what we were not waiting for.

Speaker 3:

I am starting to see the media game and I'm not saying I never saw it before, but I'm starting to, you know, as I'm plugging more and more into the narrative and like, okay, what's happening here? I'm seeing the game. So Jeffrey Sachs came out. There's factions in government within the MAGA movement. There's the anti-China out. There's factions in government within the MAGA movement. There's the anti-China faction, there's the anti-Russia faction, there's the pro-establishment faction. There's still a deep state blob element. There's the rhinos. There's factions and they have different Venn diagrams that Kamala Harris loves. They overlap all over the place.

Speaker 3:

Okay, one of the things is is no great power can allow another power to exist. One of the things is is no great power can allow another power to exist. It's just not going to happen. Russia is our equivalent. They've got land, resources, everything they need, technology, strong civil society, all that kind of stuff. They are always going to be the boogeyman. They've always been the powers boogeyman. They were Britain's boogeyman. You know, the czars have always stood against central banking because they want to do their own banking. They have a very strong sense of country.

Speaker 3:

So China now is an emerging power. So now China is becoming a boogeyman. We could make arguments on who props them up and stuff like that. Russia definitely runs independently. That, I do believe, doesn't mean they don't mafiosally do their thing, but they're independent. China, I think, is independent, but at the same time I do think they're a puppet. I think they're propped up by, I think that they are propped up by our tech, by us tech.

Speaker 12:

That's my opinion okay.

Speaker 3:

So iran is also one of these states that refuses to assimilate into the world order. And what that world order is? It's literally the banking cartel. It's the banking system at large. That's what we cut Russia off from. They said fine, we'll do it on our own. You know China's deeply ingrained in it. They've threatened to move off with the bricks Like these are. All all has to do with banking. When I was in prison for j6 in dc, we had two iranians that showed up in the pod for j6. It's a father and a son. Okay, the father was from iran and actually served three years in prison in iran.

Speaker 3:

When the ayatollah overthrow the, they replaced the shah with the ayatollah and he was in favor of the shah. The shah's big idea was he wanted to take the oil that was under their feet and he thought it belonged to the iranians. The british were pretty sure it belonged to them, right? So that's really what led to the overthrow of the shah. But one of the deals that they tried to cut right when they were the crcia was getting ready to implement that was that they would let them have the oil if they made an internal revenue tax system. So they wanted to tax their citizens. My understanding is, to this day, Iran still does not have an internal tax.

Speaker 4:

They don't tax their citizens, so they wanted them to westernize.

Speaker 3:

They wanted them to come in into the control grid, the money system. Does that make sense? That's where they have all the most leverage. What is that, was rockefeller once said you know who controls the money?

Speaker 3:

or rothschild, who controls the money actually controls the nations I don't care who's in charge of the nation, I want to know who's in charge of the bank. So, and we're seeing that now a huge part of our politics is this national debt. Who are we paying it to who? I thought we were the global power. Why are we in debt to who? Who did we borrow money from on? And I go back and I mean we borrow from ourselves, but really we borrowed it through the intermediary of the families that are involved with the federal reserve. They want to do and they want to bring everybody in. Okay, iran resists that.

Speaker 3:

They're a five thousand year old civilization they've resisted it, russia resisted it, libya resisted it, saddam Hussein in Iraq resisted it. Are you noticing a pattern?

Speaker 4:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 3:

Okay, so this is what General Wesley Clark said and this is way back in the 90s. It was the 90s, yep. And he says he recounts the story in 2007. And in a minute I'm going to play you Jeffrey Sachs, who heard it from him directly. The day it happened Jeffrey Sachs also sat was in the Kremlin, sitting next to Boris Yeltsin, when the Soviet Union fell, and they were like great, we want to be friends with America. He's like we set them up to be a boogeyman because they have the potential of being powerful. Okay, so here's what Wesley Clark said about the upcoming wars and how it was decided.

Speaker 11:

After 9-11, about 10 days after 9-11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used to work for me and one of the generals called me and he said sir, you got to come in. You got to come in and talk to me a second. I said well, you're too busy. He said no, no, he says we've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the 20th of September. I said we're going to war with Iraq. Why? He said I don't know. So I came back to see him a few weeks later and by that time we were bombing in afghanistan. I said are we still going to war with iraq? And he said oh, it's worse than that.

Speaker 11:

He said he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. He said I just. He said I just got this down from upstairs meeting the secretary of defense office today and he said this is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, lebanon, libya, somalia, sudan and finishing off Iran. I said is it classified. He said yes, sir.

Speaker 3:

I said well, don't show it to me okay, so all of those countries have been overthrown since that day chad, libya, every single one of them has been overthrown. And, uh, anyways, one of the things that uh, jeffrey sacks talked about in his podcast with tucker carlson was he talked about that list because he came out and found out that list and he talked about how, one by one, they've gone through them and every single one of them, they've had to lie to the americans about their, our involvement and how they went through, and they all are ones that were really directed by netanyahu. Jeffrey sacks considers netanyahu one of the most dangerous men in the planet. Okay, and he's, anyways, he's got his opinions. I highly recommend going and listening to that podcast, but here's Jeffrey Sachs talking about what would happen with a war with Iran.

Speaker 16:

War with Iran will be World War Three. Iran is not alone and it will not remain alone. With Russia we are at the possibility of peace, but we're also at a possibility of nuclear war. They're both very close. If we go to war with Iran, we make nuclear war all the more likely.

Speaker 2:

Do you think that the people pushing us toward war with?

Speaker 16:

Iran understand that. No, I think that they're following a plan clean break 1996 and a plan 1991, seven wars in five years. That has been deep set and that has been Netanyahu's baby all the time. Netanyahu I regard as one of the most delusional and dangerous people on the planet. He has engaged the United States so far in six disastrous wars and he's aiming to engage us in yet one more. We're not standing up for Israel. We are engaging in war on Israel's behalf all over the Middle East. That's a completely different thing. Nothing that has happened in the Middle East has been for American national security. None of it. Not one of these wars. These have been Netanyahu's wars.

Speaker 3:

Okay so. So in hindsight we can look back at each individual event and see what they were. In hindsight we can connect some dots here. Jeffrey sacks just connected them for you. Who's actually calling the shots? I'm not saying it's calling the shots like they're specifically in charge. I'm saying they've created an influence network. Netanyahu's been in power for how many of our presidents?

Speaker 4:

10, 20 I don't know one of the down there for like 50 years one of the downsides of our system.

Speaker 3:

Right, this is the whole concept of the deep embedded bureaucratic state. So here is on charlie kirk's show on real america's voice.

Speaker 6:

They've they had a panel on as this attack was going down and the initial reporting was coming out iranian, I think it's worth listening to and I think it puts in decent context the opening salvo of events that happened yesterday according to cnn, the entire iranian general staff, including the head of um all military, several senior ir Iranian nuclear scientists all eliminated. Tonight Intel suggests so that was their target.

Speaker 14:

I can tell you I can tell you from talking to Israel and Alaska flowers that this was more than just a nuclear strike. This was a decapitation strike against their military, particularly the Republican Guard leadership. So they're achieving more than just a preemptive nuclear strike they're trying to wipe out the military control and command capabilities of their best officers.

Speaker 6:

Yeah, and so Iran is a big country and a proud country. John, I want to play this here. Actually, let's play cut 526. This is CNN's reporting.

Speaker 8:

Mr Katelyn, something I just heard from a senior Israeli official who says that, according to Israeli assessments, there are very high chances that the entire Iranian general staff, including the head of the Iranian general staff, of the Iranian military and several senior Iranian nuclear scientists, were all eliminated in the Israeli strikes.

Speaker 6:

So here's where our audience is a little confused, John. Were all eliminated in the Israeli strikes. So here's where our audience is a little confused, John. It was told to be a nuclear issue. If it was just about taking out nuclear reactors, then I guess also taking out the entire senior military command. So help us understand that.

Speaker 14:

As I said, these early statements that israel give off. It has a little bit of propaganda. It often has a little bit of misdirection. Listen, I'm not unconvinced that when the president said, uh, the ed says um wickoff back as an ambassador, it wasn't a head fake to make the iranians think they had more time because the iranians were, even though donald trump signaled for two days. I can tell you from what I've heard on the ground and from our own intel before I got on air here, the iranians were caught a little flat-footed, even though they were being told.

Speaker 14:

So it's possible that wickoff and the idea that he was coming back to the region might have lulled them into some complacency. They were caught a little bit flat-footed. They could have all all been at a meeting preparing, thinking they had another day before Israel. What's our war plan? Israel put us nice in tonight. That is what happens when war gets started right. All rules are set aside and I know for certain from talking to my Israeli sources that beyond the nuclear reactor targeting, there was the decapitation strategy to get some of the Iranian National Guard and those generals that were most capable in the nuclear warfare to be knocked out tonight if they could get.

Speaker 6:

John, please tell the audience how people can support just the news, some of your reporting and what are you keeping your eye on most closely in the coming hours and days?

Speaker 14:

FBI response is going to be number one. Are they concerned? Do they begin to issue terrorism warning on our site? Do we wake up tomorrow morning to any news that US troops have been engaged by Iran overseas? I'm hoping not. I think the Trump administration right now has some level of confidence that won't happen. But those are wild cards that change this dynamic very quickly. For the United States Everybody can keep up with us at just the news dot com and Jay Solomon reports on all social media, including truth, that changed this dynamic very quickly. To the United States Everybody can keep up with us at justthedewscom and Jay Solomon reports on all social media, including Truth.

Speaker 3:

All right, so pretty good little rundown there. Listen, war, fog of war. We aren't going to know nothing. I think the best guide to the present is history.

Speaker 4:

Yeah, I mean I was going to ask how do they even know that they took out all these people that they supposedly took out? I mean, how do you even know? I don't know.

Speaker 3:

I mean it's videos, this that you're going to get reporting and you know there's a general enough consensus around the world that this thing is happening. You're going to hear stories.

Speaker 4:

It's all going to come out right right, but I guess what I'm saying is you're right.

Speaker 3:

We just we have no way of knowing we have no really like and I'm not worried about verifying. Did missiles hit Iran? No, I can't know that, but I'm pretty certain that probably is happening.

Speaker 4:

Yeah, I'm pretty sure they're not happy about something.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, so I'm not questioning the veracity of the military engagement by any means. When I tell people we're in a Truman show, that's not what I'm saying, right? No?

Speaker 4:

that's not what I wasn't saying.

Speaker 3:

I wasn't saying that either but at the same time it's like the behind this like did it have to happen this way? Is there a better way, right?

Speaker 3:

and listen, you can't get along with everybody. Sometimes you just have to go your separate ways. Not every nation state's got to trade with each other. It doesn't have to be a thing, right. But not everybody's got to be invading each other's borders. Everybody has a right to exist and blah, blah, blah, blah. This seven wars in so many years didn't happen in five, but it happened right in chronological.

Speaker 3:

Clearly still a target, right, like why, yeah, I haven't been pitched on that. You've pitched me each individual thing. You've propagandized me to get me to believe With lies yeah, with lies. And then, in retrospect, when we find out the lies, we don't consider the fact that the same actors are involved, the same people are involved, right, telling us oh, this is it, if you take out Iran, it'll fix all the problems. And we never try to resolve it. And I've never not said iran was a good, was good, like I'm not making any case for iran. Dare you make me defend iran? How dare you make me defend the jews, right? How dare you make me defend anything that's corrupt, simply because your premise is wrong? Do you see what I'm saying? Yeah, like I don't want to defend what israel's doing because some people get all israel's touchy right. Well, god's people, israel, yeah, that's true, but I don't know about netanyahu. It gets a little hairy, you know. I mean, if you look in the bible, it's not like israel always had the best leaders just saying okay, so here you go.

Speaker 3:

Here's a little montage of our fearless leader fearless because you got to be pretty fearless to do the job. He's doing Donald Trump, in contrast with Netanyahu. And this is just referring to the back in the days, right? So again the back in the days, getting ready to go into Iraq. I'm playing this because I want you to understand. It's the same freaking people. We have such a short memory. This is why the word remember is so powerful. Remember these people, remember what they've said. Ok, trump has the ability. We're going to talk about this. Listen to this. This was in the lead up and this is Trump at a debate and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever.

Speaker 16:

They lie. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none, and they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction.

Speaker 2:

Okay all right, no question whatsoever. Look bottom line. There were no weapons of mass destruction. They said there are weapons of mass destruction.

Speaker 7:

If you take out Saddam, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.

Speaker 2:

Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision anybody has made any president has made in the history of this country. That's how bad it is okay.

Speaker 15:

We should have never been in Iraq. I guarantee you no question whatsoever.

Speaker 3:

We've got Netanyahu saying if you go into Iraq, he's testifying before our Congress. No question whatsoever, it'll have positive, positive reverberations on the air. All right, let's go, did it? How many big mistakes do you get to make?

Speaker 4:

Clearly a lot. I don't know. It's amazing we're still making them on YouTube.

Speaker 3:

Chris B says he said he didn't know why. The answer is obvious. I'm not exactly sure what that was referring to. Yeah, there you go. That's the answer. Yeah, that's the same people. Exactly right, exactly. Yes, it's the same people. Pray the rosary. I didn't vaccinate my children when they were born and they certainly didn't get the jab, never got COVID once. Such a that was a huge part of it, for sure. Yeah, I mean COVID's real. I've gone down the rabbit hole of COVID's not real and then it leads you to the viruses aren't real. I don't know. I mean, at that point you're just kind of open to everything. We're talking about ancient aliens and stuff too. But the fact that it was a scam yeah, the whole thing was a scam. Like how serious was COVID? I don't know man agree with it. There's some important people to say it wasn't a big deal.

Speaker 4:

Yeah and then your kid goes hey man, life's not fair you get into the discussion of variants.

Speaker 3:

One guy's talking about one variant being not a big deal. Another guy's talking about another variant that popped up somewhere. You know it's like it's just a convoluted mess. What was a scam? Was the compliance issues right? So trump posts this right, the the bombing happens. I should, I should do this first. So first things first. The bombing happens. Netanyahu comes out and this is his opening statement on the matter.

Speaker 7:

A targeted military. Moments ago, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. To roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat. For decades, the tyrants of Tehran have brazenly, openly called for Israel's destruction. They've backed up their genocidal rhetoric with a program to develop nuclear weapons. In recent years, Iran has produced enough highly enriched uranium for nine atom bombs Nine so I'm just going to stop it there.

Speaker 3:

Jeffrey Sachs talked about this, how Iran is not close to a nuclear weapon Okay At all, and they don't want one Because of what it would bring to them. As far as all the they already can see what just even people thinking they're going to get one is doing. Right, dross fire, yes, exactly. So as a peasant, I'm left to question is iran getting a nuke the equivalent of saddam hussein having yellow cake?

Speaker 3:

They already have enough to make nine. You know I'm not saying that they weren't trying to develop nuclear reactors. The dual programming, I don't know. I'm not defending Iran, I'm simply looking at the whole picture and I'm going. This guy was a part of the yellow cake conspiracy. This man right here was a part of the yellow cake conspiracy. Would have great effect. It would be wonderful for the region. We'll never have to deal with anybody else in the region. Just one and done right. Okay, again, jeffrey sacks netanyahu's very much. These are his engagements. So that comes out now from my understanding is trump has very much told Netanyahu we're not doing this, we're not doing the.

Speaker 4:

You know going to war with.

Speaker 3:

Iran. We're not playing with it. You're on your own, I'm not.

Speaker 3:

I don't got your back that way. Ok, very different. That's apparently made some people very upset One of the things that Trump is still personally bitter about, because apparently these personal, oh. One of the things that trump is still personally bitter about because apparently these personal, oh. The ran paul thing resolved itself, by the way. Trump put out a tweet. Of course, I've been ran paul's inviting his beautiful wife blah blah, now ran paul's posting pictures of his grandkid in a hat, and oh, maybe I'll take another look at that budget. Trump played it perfectly. He realized that ran paul could take the heat of a policy debate, but he couldn't take the pettiness that him doing. He's so big. Calling someone else petty makes you petty, would you not agree? Yeah, it's the victim. I'm so bad.

Speaker 1:

My grandkids want to go to the picnic and he won't let me go because he wants to spend money and I won't let him.

Speaker 3:

All right, come, come to the picnic. Okay, I'll vote for you, bill. Masterful, masterful play. They're totally. Took Rand Paul down a peg. He thinks he's pointing out from his when anybody's got to do that. Put my tie on and it's just the level of pettiness is. Calling someone petty makes you petty, bro, the best revenge is a life well lived. Go vote your no vote. Rub it in his face as if it doesn't matter. You made it matter. You showed him that he has power over your emotions. Bad move, ram paul.

Speaker 3:

That story resolved itself. Totally. Would have been like the main topic today. Okay, iran or israel bombs iran. Netanyahu gives that little speech. Marco rubio puts out the statement. Statement from secretary of state Marco Rubio. Keep in mind they're supposed to be meeting to about a nuclear deal this weekend.

Speaker 3:

Okay, tonight Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with their regional partners. Let me be clear Iran should not target US interests or personnel. So they were draining the embassies in Iraq and around the region yesterday and that was part of the end of the show. You know you had a little prelude to this. So then Trump posted this. He says I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal.

Speaker 3:

I told them in the strongest of words just do it. But no matter how hard they tried, no matter. No matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done. They told, I told them it would be much worse than anything they know and know, anticipated or were told, and that the United States makes by, makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the world by far, and that Israel has a lot of it and much more to come. They now know how to use it.

Speaker 3:

Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they don't know what was about to happen. They are all dead now and it will only get worse. There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter Take time. There's still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end. Iran must make a deal before there is nothing left and save what once knows as the Iranian empire. No more death, no more destruction. Just do it before it's too late. God bless you. No more destruction. Just do it before it's too late, god bless you. So Trump's positioned himself as a third party here, who happens to be selling a lot of really nice weaponry Right. So that's always a funny who's trying to call for peace in some way. He has given Iran chance after chance. When they shot down the drone they were going to bomb a facility he held back. He's forced Israel to actually do the work, which is completely different than the last six engagements where we took the brunt of it right.

Speaker 3:

So if this is important to israel, they're gonna find out fafo, and I guess we're gonna fafo too. You know how much did we like these big factories making bun bombs and tanks and planes, so we'll see this could go. I mean, this could be, this could be an event that they had to strike. It happens and it dies. Iran makes a deal. They're powerless to strike back, right.

Speaker 4:

Or they do have a nuke and they try to strike back to Israel right in the heart, or what's the?

Speaker 3:

what's the song? Away, here we go boys, or some marching song, you know? Um, I saw put well, yeah, ran paul, he's ran paul, whining, of course. Okay, the other thing too here is to point out this, and this is kind of going back to the riots a little bit, but it's everything, it's creating the mentality. So this is is from an old CIA guide from 1983.

Speaker 3:

And it says this specific jobs will be assigned to other elements in order to create a martyr for the cause, leading the demonstrators into a confrontation with authority, so as to provoke riots or shootings which may cause the death of one or more persons who would become martyrs, a situation which could should be taken advantage of immediately against the regime as to create greater conflicts. Way of carrying out an uprising in mass meetings. It may be affected by means of a small group of guerrillas infiltrated among the masses, those who will have the mission of agitating. Given the impression that they are numerous and that they have extreme popular support, enjoying the tactics of force of 200 to 300 agitators, a demonstration created in which 10 000 to 20 000 persons take part. So that was back in 1983. That was in a cia uh manual there how to create martyr, literally putting someone up to die to go against an asean regime, which is an established, ancient regime regime.

Speaker 3:

So I'm not saying everything is caused by the CIA that follows this, but because you know like Trotsky and Lennon figured this out a lot longer before. But the whole thing is like this is just an established pattern. You always got to watch for that. I kick myself all the time for walking into the bear trap on J6. Should have seen it coming. And that same thing happens online. Same thing happens online. Same thing happens online.

Speaker 3:

So do you remember the? The Sinclair broadcast, where you've got all the newscasters are like there's a. There's a rash of fake news going around. There's a rash of fake news going around and everybody says the same speech on their local news channel. You've seen it. Well, again, history doesn't exactly repeat itself, but it sure rhymes. We talked yesterday about how MAGA and the White House use media influencers to kind of do the same thing to parrot the talking points, to push the narrative. Well, here you go A bunch of TikTok influencers doing the same thing about Rioting and immigration. Not quite as clean as the Sinclair one, because they're not so good at reading their teleprompters, but they're not offense like turn that crap off, I can't hear you, I can't hear anything.

Speaker 3:

Anyways, you see, here it's just. You know, the influencers are doing that, it's out there so?

Speaker 4:

are they reading off a script? Are these guys like paid influencers? Is that what's going?

Speaker 3:

on they're doing a campaign oh a campaign that you just learned about.

Speaker 3:

Oh, that's exactly how they're doing it. Okay, they get pushed to campaign hey, it's an ad read, it's a political ad read. Or they've joined some kind of group. That's like hey, we get you some special ads and you just do sponsored stuff, and there's supposed to be rules about disclosing what's sponsored and what's not. But it gets really gray when you're expressing opinions about a thing and you just happen to be getting a stipend or I don't know. They structure it however they structure it, but the point is that ain't organic. No, that is not organic. Now, some of them might even be Kool-Aid drinkers. That's where it gets really kind of scary. They're not even getting paid, they're just doing it.

Speaker 3:

Another good thing happened yesterday. So the Iran thing. We don't know. I don't know exactly everything that's gonna gonna happen there, but it is what it is. A good thing happened in terms of accountability. Elise stefanik had kathy holkel on the hot seat yesterday. You probably didn't hear about this, did you? Too much stuff happened yesterday. Elise stefanik essentially ended kathy holkel career. Now I got to be honest with you. Elise Stefanik is an assassin. She has taken out how many Ivy League I mean the president of Harvard. You know she's taken out some real serious people with her cross examinations, like just exposing them. So she did this to Kathy Hochul. So listen to how she starts out with this oh, sorry, I'm sorry, is that correct?

Speaker 13:

I believe it is, and you extended this executive order not once, not twice, but three times, most recently january 16th this this year. Is that correct? If that's what your facts show, I signed countless executive orders. I would assume you know it's Executive Order 1. And this is a continuation of your predecessor's Sanctuary State policies correct Is included in that. I want to be sure we are defining Sanctuary State properly. I'll define it for you. It is the policy of the state, that state officers or employees.

Speaker 3:

So she starts out, executive Order 1, continuing the sanctuary state policies. She reads she doesn't do any of that. Well, you have to figure out what does sanctuary state. No, I'll read exactly what the executive order says. So then she goes into this. She goes in to start actually showing pictures.

Speaker 13:

He violently raped her in Albany, new York. Do you know who Sebastian Zepeda Khalil is? I'm sure you'll tell me. There's many cases whether these are high profile cases.

Speaker 13:

New Yorkers know about them and you don't. So let's talk about Sebastian Zepeda Khalil, do you know who that is? I don't have the specific details at my disposal. No well, this is an illegal migrant in New York because of your sanctuary state policies. Do Do you know what crime he committed? I'm not familiar at this moment. I bet you're going to be familiar when I remind you he found a sleeping woman on the subway, lit her on fire and burned her alive. This is in Kathy Hochul's New York.

Speaker 3:

She didn't know. You remember that right? Yeah, it was all over the news, huge deal. She didn't remember who it was.

Speaker 13:

As I'm sure you are aware, and I'll remind you that ICE issued an order to detain this violent criminal, but that was rejected by New York officials due to sanctuary state laws. Now, do you know who?

Speaker 3:

Raymond Rojas. So she does this all these illegal migrants that committed crimes.

Speaker 10:

Okay.

Speaker 3:

And then she gets to the end.

Speaker 13:

Who was raped?

Speaker 3:

Ends her career. Man Ended her career.

Speaker 13:

Which you put in place with executive orders, instead of advocating for victims a five-year-old who was raped, you did not. They were released because of sanctuary state policies in new york state no amount of words is going to clean up your failed record and these horrific crimes committed in sanctuary state that you created, and with that I representation the facts absolutely yields back.

Speaker 3:

So she recognizes miss norton keeps saying fall and in her career man now, elise stefanik, is rumored to be considering running for governor of new york. If that's the case, that's the campaign right there yep, absolutely that ad now scott besant.

Speaker 3:

Scott besant is someone who really I'll tell you what this is. This guy's got that billionaire swing like he. He just he does it in a very little tacky professional way, but he is pretty clear. He got into a little back and forth with senator michael bennett on the subject of tax cuts yesterday and again. This is good news. The people that are currently running the show right now they know who voted for him.

Speaker 15:

Well, sir, we had a referendum on november 5th. Your side lost. I agree with you.

Speaker 4:

Your side lost. I agree with that, and a higher decibel level, and I'm a rare Democrat who doesn't blame Donald Trump for winning.

Speaker 10:

I'm sad he won. I don't blame him for winning, but don't come here.

Speaker 14:

Higher decibel level does not give your statements more veracity. Go ahead, Mr what.

Speaker 3:

Higher decibel level does not give your statements more veracity. Yeah, sometimes it does. I don't know. It's pretty convincing. That's pretty good. We had a referendum. Your side lost. I don't know. I love that and it's such a good referendum your side lost. Do you know billy long is? I imagine I already told you who billy long was. He was an auctioneer. He's the guy who did that one. He was an auctioneer. He's the guy who did this. So one of the things being an auctioneer in Congress, the way our debt is running out of control.

Speaker 5:

They find it very handy to have Jeff Duncan and myself here in Washington. We are one of the few people that can actually keep up with the national debt. I'm going to tell you, dude, I'm going to tell you, dude, I'm going $9.2 trillion, $2 trillion, $9.3 trillion, $9.5 trillion, $9.4 trillion, $9.5 trillion, $6 trillion, $6 trillion, $7 trillion, $9.8 trillion, $8 trillion, $9.9 trillion, $10 trillion, $10 trillion. $11 trillion, $11 trillion, $12 trillion, $12 trillion $13 trillion.

Speaker 3:

When, uh when warloomer got up in one of the committee hearings and was yelling, he started killing her and she was being hauled out. He started auctioneering thing is pretty fun.

Speaker 16:

Oh yeah, I remember that.

Speaker 3:

So that's billy long, yeah, so elizabeth warren warns us if billy long. This is hilarious.

Speaker 4:

Actually, I gotta, okay, I gotta, I gotta show this because it's awesome elizabeth, I was just fun and when I was telling, saying shut up, because oh yeah, okay, so all right, you don't have to show me searching this here I'm not, but okay.

Speaker 3:

So elizabeth warren tweeted this out. She said senate republicans just confirmed irs commissioner who one supported legislation that would abolish the irs. Two, doesn't know the law. Three, has a track record of doing whatever donald trump tells him to do. Yes, yes at the irs, oh my gosh, yes, the guy at the IRS who repeatedly sponsored legislation to abolish the IRS is now running the IRS. Yes, hallelujah Again. I'm as afraid as totalitarianism. Right, because this guy could come in here with the attitude of well, if we're going to keep the IRS and everybody's got to pay, and he could start auditing you like crazy to try to like create law and order in the tax system, if they actually abolish the IRSs.

Speaker 4:

We should get a new holiday, just like july 4th that's for real day.

Speaker 3:

That was his intention with. Liberation day is someday. We'll look back and go oh, it's liberation day from the tax system. Yeah, we moved to the tariff system. Yeah, it's liberating america, that's the whole thing yeah, that's what I'm saying.

Speaker 4:

We need a new holiday.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, okay, bro, we did it well. We got through all my tabs, the whole show. It's amazing. A little bit longer than every other day. Lots of good chats. Yes, hochul's career should be ended. Guys, it was so great to have you today, see late to the conversation. I had COVID before vaccines were available, donated blood twice a year over a month so my antibodies could be used to help those who were sick. Yeah, that was cool, okay sick.

Speaker 3:

Yeah, that was cool. Okay. Okay, he did do that. I know who he is. Yeah, he did do that. Okay, all right, guys, thanks everything. Don't forget to visit left behind withoutorg. I say that every day. Please help grow the show. Don't underestimate the power of one. Please share the show with someone today and we look forward to talking to you guys again tomorrow. Bye, bye, old woman.

Speaker 6:

Man, man, sorry, what night. Lives in that castle over there. I'm 37.

Speaker 1:

Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.

Speaker 1:

Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress.

Speaker 1:

There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.

Speaker 1:

I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would, please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord what I? I don't have a lord. What I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs Be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet.

Speaker 1:

I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then. The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.

Speaker 1:

Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up Now? We see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? You, you, you, you.

People on this episode