Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
When Justice Fails: The Michael Flynn Case and Government Corruption
Beneath the polished narrative of American politics lies a raw truth: we are peasants caught in a power struggle we never asked for. This episode peels back the curtain on the forces transforming our country while the average citizen bears the burden of each political decision.
The Seattle CHOP/CHAZ saga reached its inevitable conclusion after autonomous zone protesters found themselves outmaneuvered by a simple permit application. When Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes applied to hold a demonstration in the occupied park, Mayor Jenny Durkin faced an impossible choice: grant the permit and risk violence or dismantle the zone entirely. Meanwhile, local businesses have launched a scathing 56-page lawsuit against the city for abandoning them to vandalism, property damage, and danger.
Justice finally arrived for General Michael Flynn as newly released notes expose how former President Obama personally directed aspects of the investigation against him. These bombshell documents reveal Biden suggesting the obscure Logan Act as a weapon against Flynn – a 200-year-old law never successfully enforced but conveniently featured in an episode of "The West Wing."
Perhaps most revealing is Washington Governor Inslee's admission that mask mandates serve primarily as symbols to "raise consciousness" rather than addressing genuine health concerns – a position actually supported by the New England Journal of Medicine, which acknowledges masks offer "little, if any, protection" outside healthcare settings.
We've entered an information war where speaking truth has never been more crucial. When protestors who demand defunding police suddenly cry out for officers after being attacked, or when politicians like Pelosi accuse Republicans of "trying to get away with murder," the hypocrisy demands our response. The time for polite silence has passed – stand your ground and turn the mirror on those attempting to reshape America through intimidation and division.
Ready to join the resistance? Connect with me @PeasantsPod on Twitter and Parler, on Facebook at The Peasants Perspective, or via email at peasantspod@gmail.com.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her thumbchicks had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb, we're getting screwed, man.
Speaker 2:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. All the revolution's gonna be Through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. And welcome to another incredibly busy news day. Yesterday it was like the dam broke. There were so many things going on. We've got James Flynn is no longer a political prisoner. The Court of Appeals has let him off. We've got a bunch of stuff going on, so we're going to get into it today, and I actually want to start out with a little bit of Donald Trump. You got to hear what he had to say yesterday, but the radical left.
Speaker 3:They hate our history, they hate our values and they hate everything we prize as Americans, and we're right, because our country didn't grow great with them. It grew great with you and your thought process and your ideology. The left-wing mob is trying to demolish our heritage so they can replace it with a new repressive regime that they alone control. They're tearing down statues, desecrating monuments and purging dissenters. It's not the behavior of a peaceful political movement. It's the behavior of totalitarians and tyrants and people that don't love our country. They don't love our country. They don't love our country. The left is not trying to promote justice or equality or lift up the downtrodden. They have one goal the pursuit of their own political power, for whatever reason, but that's their goal. That really seems to be their goal, their goal of their sickness. And if you give power to people that demolish monuments and attack churches and seize city streets and set fire to buildings, then nothing is sacred and no one is safe.
Speaker 2:Nothing is sacred and no one is safe If you give power to tyrants to attack buildings, do graffiti. Nothing is sacred and no one is safe. That is so true. That is so true. Donald Trump has summed it up excellently. Okay, I want to go through.
Speaker 2:I'm going to kind of jump topic to topic to topic today to try to get all the information I can, and then who knows if we're even going to get to it all. So let's go to Chaz first of all. So a little bit of insider information on Chaz that I found out. So Chaz, the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. So it was named the Autonomous Zone and after about three or four days of being called Chaz, the Autonomous Zone, some city people came in and said hey, you can't call yourself the Autonomous Zone because autonomous makes it seem like you're not, not, you've separated from the state and you're like on your own. And we can't, we, like, can't allow that. Like, we will come in and take you out. So the organizers, in conjunction with the city managers, came in and said okay, we'll call it chop the, uh, the capitol hill occupy protest. Okay, so now it's the. It's reminiscent of occupy wall street right, or occupy wall street. So now they're reminiscent of Occupy Wall Street. Right yeah, occupy Wall Street, so now they're the Occupy process, Capitol Hill Occupy protest. So CHOP, that gave Jenny Durkin a plausible out to say, oh, this is a peaceful protest, these guys are just occupying this space and that's totally safe and okay. So they did that.
Speaker 2:Well then, a brilliant man who's been banned from every known platform out there His name is Gavin McGinnis. Now, who is Gavin McGinnis? Gavin McGinnis is the former leader of the proud boys. I actually think he's re-involved himself with the proud boys at some point. But what the proud boys are is it's basically like a bunch of rednecks, people who are patriots, ex-military, gay, straight, black, white, asian men, women. They call themselves the proud boys. They do body, they do, they'll do free. I don't know if it's always free, but I'm pretty sure it's usually free. They'll do free security at, like college events for people like Ben Shapiro or Ann Coulter. So these guys are just. They're like the antithesis of Antifa. In fact, there's a famous incident where Antifa had said that they were going to come and take out and Colter beat her up, whatever, drag her out of the restaurant and she was having lunch with a couple proud boys who were there, kind of as her bodyguards, and a fairly decent sized mob of Antifa showed up and they were so outgunned as far as bicep size with the proud boys they ran off. Anyways, there's all kinds of funny stories. So that's who the Proud Boys are. The Proud Boys oftentimes they're really active down in Portland where Antifa has kind of had a real foothold for a long time, and that's where you get a lot of the street clashes that you can see on the internet between Antifa and a bunch of white guys, a bunch of rednecks. Usually is what it looks trade. I don't know if that's really the case. And anyways, that's the Proud Boys. So the Proud Boys are a public organization. They're no different than Antifa. Whatever you consider Antifa, you've got to at least give Proud Boys the same. I don't think they're international terror. I don't think anybody's ever gotten hurt from the Proud Boys. It wasn't, you know, actively being Antifa on the streets, but nonetheless they decided.
Speaker 2:Gavin McGinnis went down to the city of Seattle and he applied for a protest permit, a permit to be able to hold a protest in the capital, the park that was inside of the CHOP. So half of CHOP is just a big park, a public park so he wanted to hold a public protest in that park. So look at the position this put Jenny Dirk, who used to be a US attorney. The position it puts her in is now she has to grant that protest on First Amendment grounds. You can't not grant a protest. I mean, you can't sit here. You granted a protest to Black Lives Matters, okay. You can't not grant it to white, to Proud Boys, okay. Like you can't sue, oh, these guys are terror, those guys aren't. You can't pull it off. She would never prevail in court with that argument because of who she gave the original permit to for the Occupy protest. So he applied for the permit. She freaked out because she needs to now grant this permit. She grants this permit. There's going to be a war, okay, if Proud Boys show up inside CHOP between Chaz Simone or Raz Simone and all of his thugs and all of the guns and there was a total of four shootings inside of there in a matter of three days right, it would be a war. It would be an absolute nightmare for the city of Seattle. And so Jenny Durkin flipped out, called Gavin McGinnis and begged him to not apply for that permit and she agreed to disband the CHOP. She is avoiding the legal challenge and the legal trouble.
Speaker 2:Obviously, this thing isn't looking good. Obviously, there's multiple reasons why this thing needed to go away, but it was a counter-protest that put it out. Somebody got the wise idea and said, well, if they can speak, we can speak. And who knows what would have happened, who knows how that would have really gone down, but it would have been good Now, along with the Chaz. These people are stupid folks. These people are stupid.
Speaker 2:I'm going to play you a video. This is one of the men who was shot inside of Chaz. Keep in mind. He's there through the night, a lawless area that's claiming to be autonomous. No police officers are allowed in. They've got signs up to say this is a no-cop co-op, a no-cop co op. When I see a sign that says no-cop co-op, I assume there's no cops in this cooperative area we're in.
Speaker 2:This man chose to come down to the no-cop co-op known as Chaz and then Chop. He chose to participate in an absolutely ridiculous protest. He chose to involve himself with people he shouldn't have been involving himself. I'm throwing everything in the kitchen sink at this guy. What I'm about to play you to me is the most unacceptable thing I've ever heard. It is unacceptable from top to bottom. It's unacceptable from the city side, because this guy's right, but this guy's also wrong. This is the problem with our society no personal accountability. None, zero, zilch. Our politicians don't take personal accountability. The peasants rarely ever take personal responsibility. We always look to the government or someone else for a handout. Nobody takes personal responsibility. Where's the morals of this country, the Confucianism, the personal resolve for right living? This is ridiculous. All right, Let me play this here resolve for right living.
Speaker 4:Okay, got, this is ridiculous. All right, let me. Let me play this here. Yo, I was shot in Seattle at Chaz on Friday. The cops left me out there to die.
Speaker 2:I need help. Okay, the cops left me out there to the die. I hope your buds already boiling. What were you in protest for? To protest disbandment of the cops. You get that right, Like. Do you understand the entire point of the protest, the entire movement that you're participating in, the entire reason why you're in the Chaz is because you want to disband and get rid of the cops. You don't want them in your life. I apologize, guys, I hate screaming into the microphone. It's really early in the morning and I'm real fired up.
Speaker 4:Somebody in the legal or media to get my story told and get it out there. I got shot five times. Need you guys help Yo? I was shot in Seattle.
Speaker 2:He got shot five times and now he's looking for legal help, lawyers. Whoever he's going to get free help, they're going to sue the city. They're going to sue this person, sue that. They're probably going to sue Donald Trump, for goodness sakes, and you know who's going to front the bill. Because someone's going to pay this guy. Someone's going to end up paying him a settlement. The city's going to tell him to shut up, pay him a million bucks, or he's going to get some kind of ridiculous settlement.
Speaker 2:Because he got shot inside of the no cop co-op, where the city wasn't enforcing their laws, where they gave up on a precinct. He participated in a defund, the police protest. He participated in the very thing that he's now complaining about. Isn't it convenient that when you get shot, all of a sudden, you feel like you deserve the cops? Yes, we all feel that way, buddy. That's why we're all scratching our heads at what's going on with these protests and riots. It is complete idiocy, idiocy. We're trying to disband the police over this stuff. Okay, this guy just. He just really got me fired up. So now, in addition to this guy, who's now going to sue the city and get legal help because he got shot and got left there.
Speaker 2:I remember I told you I was going to play the video, but it's just full of swear words, where Roz Simone is like hey to the paramedics, you got to come help the guy. He's bleeding. That's that kid, totally legit, right? The paramedics are sitting there. Look, everything about this is a mess from top to bottom. At the end of the day, jenny Durkin, the blood's on her hands, the blood is on Jenny Durkin's hands. She should resign, obviously she should resign. So not only did he leave a guy bleeding in the streets which I agree with him he got left abandoned there. Now I have a huge personal issue with him because he he chose to be there and the fact that now he calls out is the reason why we get into these pickles in America. What's good for thee is not good for me, and what's good for me is not good for thee. Right, it's just like in Washington DC.
Speaker 2:I'm not gonna play it because the audio is just horrible and you can barely hear it, but there's a scene where a transgender guy in a pink bikini runs up to one of the CBS media or ABC media and literally assaults him and robs him right there on air and the security comes in and takes the guy out. And the anchor woman, the woman who's doing the report, who has been doing reports about these peaceful protests and about how the protesters aren't throwing rocks and the police are the ones instigating all the violence. That woman looks and goes and who has been pro-defund. The police, as she's getting attacked by a transgender man in a pink bikini outside of the White House. She goes where are the police when you need them? Caught on a hot mic. That's the problem, right? Oh yeah, no cops until it's time.
Speaker 2:Okay, next thing, there are more than a dozen businesses inside of the CHOP zone in Seattle's Capitol Hill. They have filed a 56-page class action lawsuit against the city of Seattle. They're seeking unspecified damages. They could ask for billions. They could ask for billions. The terror they've gone through.
Speaker 2:I posted a video. You can go. Look at all my social medias. I posted a video. I drove around the CHOP. You can see the neighborhood that they're in. Take a look at it. It's a nice neighborhood.
Speaker 2:This is Capitol Hill. This is like the wine and cheese in the evening part of town. It's just barely across the highway from the main. You could see skyscrapers. If you're standing on someone's roof. It's like you're right there, it's Capitol Hill, you're in the heart of downtown, basically the beautiful residential area of downtown. I mean a two-bedroom townhouse in there can't cost less than like $1.3, $1.4 million.
Speaker 2:That's the area these guys took over. Those are the citizens, those are the businesses that were abandoned. Okay, let me read you the list of these businesses Hunter Capital LLC, liquid and Wine LLC, enterprise and Car Tender. Car Tender is the one that got broken into the Richmark Company and had a fire started. Sage Physical Therapy, kathleen Capels an individual, onks Homeowner Association, madrona Real Estate Services, madrona Real Estate Investors or some other real estate investors Pike Associates, redside Partners Apartments LLC. So this is a lot of the property owners, but as well as a couple of these business owners.
Speaker 2:Nice little class action lawsuit here, and in the claim they say the rights. So they're giving a little bit of a pass to Chaz saying hey, they're supposed to peaceably assemble and everything. But they say the lawsuit does not seek to undermine the chat participants message right, but we have been overrun by. We have been the resident businesses, employees and residents in and around CHOP, which have been overrun by the city of Seattle's unprecedented decision to abandon and close off an entire city neighborhood, leaving it unchecked by the police, unserved by the fire and health services and inaccessible to the public at large. The city's decisions has subjected businesses, employees and residents of that neighborhood to extensive property damage, safety dangers and an inability to use and access their properties.
Speaker 2:On June 8, 2020, the city of Seattle abruptly deserted the Seattle Police Department's East Precinct on the corner of 12th Avenue and East Pine in the Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood, leaving behind numerous barriers that had previously been used as a line between the police and the protesters. When the city abandoned the precinct and the nearby barriers, a number of individuals who had been in the area took control of the barriers and used them to block off streets in and around the East Precinct. In the days and weeks after the city abandoned the East Precinct, chop participants have occupied the public streets, sidewalks and parks in the area at all hours of the day and night. Rather than seeking to restore order and protect the residents and property owners within CHOP, the city instead chose to actively endorse, enable and participate in the occupation of CHOP. The city has provided Cal Anderson Park, a public park located at the center of CHOP, to CHOP for the use of staging grounds supporting CHOP's occupation of the surrounding area, supported by the city. Countless CHOP participants now reside in the park at all times of the day and night, having turned it into a tent city. At any given time, hundreds of CHOP participants are camped out in the park. Violence, vandalism, excessive noise, public drug use and other crimes are rampant within the park. These guys filled this out and filed it under oath, or, you know, in the courts.
Speaker 2:The city's conduct has resulted in CHOP being blocked off from public access, among other conduct detailed below. The city recently provided the participants with concrete barriers to use to block the streets, which CHOP participants have indeed used to barricade the streets. The borders have at times been closed, been guarded by armed CHOP participants who oversee who can and cannot enter CHOP. As a result, the streets are barred to most all vehicular traffic, making it virtually impossible for residents and businesses to access their buildings, receive deliveries and provide goods and services to the few customers willing to enter CHOP. The city's behavior has made CHOP the officers will not even approach the area of the shooting until approximately 20 minutes after the shooting and no professional medical response was available for at least 15 minutes. So that's talking about the shooting. At other times, even during life and death emergencies, the police have acquiesced to demands from CHOP participants that they have abandoned the area. The city acknowledged the safety issues. It created, in particular, nothing that there are dangerous conditions at night, but the city has nonetheless chosen to maintain the policy providing resources to support CHOP.
Speaker 2:And then this last paragraph. This is crazy. The city's conduct has enabled the widespread destruction and vandalism of private property. Graffiti and guys. The graffiti is horrible, it's everywhere. Everything around CHOP is tagged. You can go check my video. Everything is tagged. The city's conduct has enabled the widespread destruction and vandalism of private property. Graffiti is pervasive throughout CHOP. It is not only on barriers, streets, sidewalks, but also on nearly every private building within CHOP. Graffiti that is painted over almost immediately returns. The property owners have been told by CHOP participants that if they dare to paint over graffiti, their buildings will be more severely vandalized or even burned to the ground. The city has done nothing to prevent this conduct, but instead has actively endorsed and supported the ongoing occupation of the CHOP area and the destruction of property that occupies. As a result, property tenants, property owners and their tenants have not been able to fully use their property owners. Property owners and tenants have, for instance, had to lock and barricade their garages and loading areas for risk of having CHOP participants entering and vandalizing them. So, as you can see, it's a 56 page lawsuit. The city of Seattle is toast. It's toast. This is crazy. This is crazy talk. And you know what? I hope that Bill Barr. I hope that Bill Barr, as far as any kind of federal support can support these guys, the city of Seattle was warned by everybody and their dog not to let this proceed. Everybody and their dog not to let this proceed. Okay, so that's CHOP.
Speaker 2:Okay, yesterday we had a pretty amazing breakthrough in the Michael Flynn case. So, michael Flynn, a couple things happened. First of all, going back to the Michael Flynn case, michael Flynn's been sitting in court. He's had Judge Sullivan. Judge Sullivan is the corrupt judge who I've mentioned before, has some issues with his own son. I got a new accusation on that today too, and a new allegation. So Judge Sullivan was working with Elijah Cummings inside of Baltimore. They're defrauding Howard University. They were covering up some of their own personal and private sex scandals. So that's Judge Sullivan. Judge Sullivan ended up with the Michael Flynn case.
Speaker 2:Michael Flynn pled guilty because of the pressure on his son, as well as the abhorrent amount of money that he spent, as well as the advice of his first attorneys, who happened to also be the law firm where Eric Holder is a partner. Eric Holder is the former attorney general under Barack Obama who famously said he was Barack Obama's wingman. If Bill Barr said that today he'd be head on a pike. But that is who General Flynn was getting his original legal advice from, who were also trying to protect themselves, because they were the ones who helped General Flynn fill out the FARA registration form, the Foreign Agent Registration Act form that he was being charged with lying to the FBI. There's a whole bunch of series of things, but anyways, they're the ones who helped him fill out that form. And so, in order to avoid legal trouble for their own firm, they essentially threw Michael Flynn under the bus. So Michael Flynn said yeah, I'm guilty of lying to the FBI, because I told the FBI that I didn't mention sanctions on the phone call and they claimed that I did mention sanctions on the phone call to the Russian ambassador. Turns out he never mentioned sanctions on the phone call. The FBI was lying about him mentioning sanctions on the phone call, therefore setting him up to have committed perjury, lying to the FBI, when in fact it was the FBI who lied to him. So now he ends up eventually hiring Sidney Powell as his attorney.
Speaker 2:Sidney Powell tries to remove his guilty plea. This is apparently quite the process for Judge Sullivan, who can't just allow this thing to go to trial, and he wants hearing after hearing as to why he shouldn't just throw General Flynn into jail without a trial. Obviously nobody wants to go to trial on this thing, because then there's discovery, there's a jury, all that kind of stuff. So, judge Sullivan, after the DOJ finally moves in, there's declassified documents that are completely exculpatory to General Flynn, showing that he was absolutely targeted from the highest levels of the US government because of the things he knew all the way. Going back to Libya you can go back and listen to my Libya how it All Starts, part 1 episode, and we get into the groundwork of what happened in Libya, and General Flynn was completely aware of everything that happened there that led to the rise of ISIS. Additionally, general Flynn, there's a lot of things that General Flynn knew. He knows quote unquote knows where the bodies are buried.
Speaker 2:So, general Flynn, judge Sullivan, won't dismiss the case that the DOJ has dropped. So now the DOJ, the prosecution and Sidney Powell are both telling the judge you got to drop this case. Nobody wants to try this case. Judge Sullivan won't do it, so he appoints another retired judge to act as the prosecutor, something that is completely unheard of in the criminal justice system. So, sidney Powell I'm sorry for the quick story here, but I just want to make sure you understand kind of the basic timeline of events. So then Sidney Powell files a writ of mandamus which then goes to an appellate court in the DC circuit. The appellate court is made up of three judges. Two of the judges are appointed by Republican nominees and one of the judges is appointed by Obama. The three judges hear the arguments from the three sides, both the DOJ and Judge Sullivan's representatives and Sidney Powell. They asked a lot of questions and that was all last week. Yesterday they came out with supporting the writ of mandamus and they ordered Judge Sullivan to drop the case on a vote of two to one.
Speaker 2:What this means is it means the justice system Everybody knows Judge Sullivan or General Flynn is empty. You look at their sculptural information and it's very obvious. He was targeted and what this does is it A releases him as a political prisoner. And he even went a step farther. Yesterday he called in. Apparently there wasn't a gag order placed on him, or there was.
Speaker 2:I've heard mixed things. But either way the result's the same. He didn't talk Since he was indicted. He has not spoken a word. I mean nobody has been on the radio, hasn't been on TV. I've heard of no speaking engagements. He's made like two Twitter posts, two, three Twitter posts in a couple years. You know the American flag, his grandson saying the Pledge of Allegiance. Very little.
Speaker 2:Yesterday he called in randomly to the Rush Limbaugh show, spent about four and a half minutes on the Rush Limbaugh show and he basically said this. I'll summarize it for you I'm glad that justice is done. We were really concerned justice wouldn't be done, but this is a huge win for justice. This is a huge win for Lady Liberty that the justice system, even though it's got all these corrupt pieces, eventually you get to where truth prevails. And so he says now we're onto the next phase. Obviously General Flynn is going to be able to sue everybody involved and he can just flay this thing open in civil court really, and criminal court. I mean there's crimes. There were absolutely crimes committed in the prosecution and the persecution of General Flynn.
Speaker 2:Okay, so, having said all that, yesterday we got that writ of mandamus, and so what that written mandamus said is the evidence that came out on top of the written mandamus, sorry. So there's the two things. The written mandamus came out, but in addition there was additional evidence that was brought forward to the court showing that General Flynn was innocent. So let me read you what it was that we got yesterday. So these are new notes. These came out before they were filed under seal and actually Judge Sullivan apparently had a copy of these notes and they were filed under permanent seal. So again we are showing that Judge Sullivan knew this and still wouldn't release the case. Okay, so these handwritten notes, the new notes which record Comey's accounting to Strzok of the meeting substance, constitute definitive evidence that Obama, barack Obama himself, was personally directing significant aspects of a criminal investigation into his political enemy's top foreign policy advisor. So these are what the notes said. The notes are written in chicken scratch and there's some shorthand in here, but basically these are the notes as we would read them. So the NSA, DDAG so these are the Flynn cuts.
Speaker 2:Other countries. The Deputy Director, attorney General, leaned forward on the unclass question mark VP. So this is Biden. Biden questions the Logan Act. Can we get him on the Logan Act? So this is significant because no one has ever prosecuted the Logan Act and oddly enough, there's a cute little episode of the West Wing a few years ago, which purportedly is a favorite show of Joe Biden. Can you believe this? This is so I can't even believe it, like it's so ridiculous. The entire plot of Spygate was hatched out of a West Wing episode. That's right, ladies and gentlemen. In the West Wing episode they went after a general for the Logan Act. The reason it's ridiculous on its face is the Logan Act is a 200-year-old law that's never once been successfully enforced. It is, on its face, unconstitutional. But in a fictional TV series you can use a law like that to go after a general for talking to a foreign country. So, vp Biden, dumb ass Biden excuse my language folks. Biden suggests the Logan Act as if he just watched a rerun of the West Wing. Okay, the president says these are unusual times, vp, I've been on the Intel committee for 10 years and I never dot, dot, dot, whatever.
Speaker 2:President, make sure you look at things and plus have the right people on it. So this is a handwritten note where the president of the United States is directing an investigation. The topic of this conversation is General Flynn's phone call with the ambassador Kislyak. This is the moment when they are setting up the intent to go after General Flynn. Now remember, if you look back, the FBI was ready to drop any investigation into General Flynn because they could find nothing derogatory. But on this day, after this meeting, peter Strzok goes back and texts Lisa Page, his girlfriend, and says turns out, we didn't shut down the Flynn case because of our own incompetence. A paperwork error caused them not to shut down the case, which was convenient, peter Strzok pointed out in the text message, because they wouldn't have to open a new one Big deal. So the president says make sure you look at things, plus, have the right people on it. They changed out the people who were looking at General Flynn too. Peter Strzok, bob Mueller, you know the whole, the whole Comey gang, right, the whole Mueller rich hunt, the 13 angry Democrats, that's these people quote have the right people on it.
Speaker 2:President, is there anything I shouldn't be telling the transition team? Oh, my goodness, you have an outgoing administration days before leaving office and you have the president wondering if he should disclose things to the new incoming administration. Is governance not important? Is rule of law not important? Is the new administration doesn't need to be fully briefed on all the functions and workings of America? Of course? Of course You've got obstruction of an incoming presidency. You've got acts of treason in these notes here, flynn, this is from the director. So this is Flynn. Oh, this is from James Comey. Flynn says the Kislyak calls appear legit. So now you have the FBI director holding a copy of Flynn's phone call telling the president, the VP and the others standing there that the call appears legit and then ineligible happy new year. Dot, dot, dot. Yeah right, those are the notes. Those are the notes. Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it. Obama is quoted as saying Comey's description that Flynn and Kislyak calls appear legit shorthand for legitimate and other notes.
Speaker 2:Until this week, this exculpatory information was withheld from Flynn and his defense team, multiple congressional committees and the American public. A lengthy campaign to illegally leak selectively edited defamatory information through media accessories damaged the Trump administration and spurred the appointment of a special counsel to investigate anyone associated with the Trump campaign. This is crazy, folks, crazy. Crazy in the kind of way that if we don't get justice, we're done, we're done. Okay, another thing I want to throw it out there. I want to make people aware who knows Somebody might do this. This comes from my tipper, john here to help. Who's the federal witness in federal witness protection? And John here is saying that Biden sometimes this stuff is just really hard to ingest because it is like geez. So with this he says who's controlling Judge Sullivan? So it was Biden who started the Logan Act against Reverend Flynn and who controls Judge Sullivan? Judge Sullivan, his son Biden's coming, and others entered the others' House of Underage Horrors H-O-R-R-O-S, where they could go one in several areas.
Speaker 2:So I don't know if I mentioned to you before about on Twitter there's a girl that goes by the handle Obama Girl, and John here to help gave her some tips on some houses she needed to go check out. She went and checked out these houses these houses happen to be the houses that these congressional leaders, these corrupt judges, apparently go to abuse children and she collected evidence, video evidence as well as testimony of the other neighbors, and took it to the FBI. She took it to the FBI. She live streamed a lot of this on Twitter and then, after she went to the FBI, she got death threats. I mean, almost instantly she got death threats and then she ended up going silent for quite a while. Anyway, she's popped back up, so we know she's safe, but now she's awaiting. You know she's on the run. She's on the run.
Speaker 2:She turned over this information that was very damning. She put it all out there on Twitter pictures, evidence, testimony and everything and now she's on the run. So this is the kind of stuff that we go okay, is there going to be justice? Right, john is here to help. He's an insider who's on the run as well because the government wants him gone because of the things he knows about people that are currently in government, like Judge Sullivan and Biden. Like they don't want these loose ends out there. And these loose ends are out there putting their stuff on Twitter to researchers. And Bama Girl was just a Twitter researcher in Baltimore, in the neighborhood, and she went out and checked this out and uncovered something that's huge and yet, just as a little individual, she's powerless. Right, she went and dropped it off at the FBI. She gave them all the information she had. She videoed herself doing it so that she could prove that she did it and the next thing, you know, she's run for her life.
Speaker 2:You know, sometimes I always think about Donald Trump. When he talks about taking the slings and arrows, I mean, geez, okay, so that's neither here nor there, that's only an allegation. That's just as far as Twitter goes. But you know, when you think about the craziness, you know, here's a judge, who's the DOJ, says hey, we got nothing to try and actually even gave the judge a sculptural evidence showing that General Flynn was set up and he still doesn't dismiss the case. You have to scratch your head really hard. I have this discussion with my brother-in-law all the time where he tries to give people the benefit of the doubt and I'm like, look man, you can't give people the benefit of the doubt when they've burned you 97 times. Like you've got an innocent general who spent millions of dollars on this defense and you're trying to wrangle some kind of mental gymnastic reason why the judge shouldn't drop the case when the DOJ says to drop it. There's no mental gymnastics needed here. You've got open and obvious corruption. You've got to ask the why questions. Why is Judge Sullivan doing that? What's going on? I mean, it's just crazy. So I want to play this here. This is a oh.
Speaker 2:I do want to mention one other thing. This has to do with Black Lives Matter. So I've heard a lot about a lot of people saying you know black. I personally have spoken to people who are unclear that black lives matter is a Marxist organization. I am disgusted. Our streets are painted up with black lives matter. There's a black lives matter car in NASCAR. Now there's black lives matter showing up everywhere. What they're doing is they're normalizing. They're normalizing Marxism as a political ideology.
Speaker 2:Do you remember when Donald Trump says you know, you are the ones who built this great country, you and your ideology. What is our ideology? He's pointing at us, the peasants. What is the peasants ideology? Right, we, the people, are sovereign. We, the people, hold the power. We, the people, will self-govern. We, the people, will, from amongst us, appoint people to govern. Okay, those people have failed us. The government has become independent from the people. It's time for the people to reclaim the government.
Speaker 2:Donald Trump is the first step in reclaiming the government. We took an outsider, a man of our own, a man who made his money in the land and on real estate, just like most of us can. Not in hedge funds, not doing the invisible, not grifting, not getting billions of foreign dollars in grants and aids. Donald Trump made his money. Like every other peasant has the ability to make his money. That's why guys like Barack Obama said Donald Trump is the epitome of the American dream, because Donald Trump didn't need government corruption. In fact, he fought government corruption in order to make his fortune. In fact, he fought government corruption in order to make his fortune. Okay, enough about that.
Speaker 2:So this Trump thing, the Trump resistance, was started by Act Blue. Act Blue uses a place called Momentum Trains and the Sunrise Movement. Momentum, does the excuse me, just Momentum. Momentum has trained the BLM and the Sunrise Movement. Momentum, does the excuse me, just Momentum. Momentum has trained the BLM and the Sunrise Movement. Both are riotous and essentially the same organization, and so, anyways, you can trace this back here. Momentum trains on Marxism ideology and building social movements to transform common sense and win on the most pressing social issues. Anyway, so that's what. That's what's going on. I mean, the obvious connections are there and they're also starting to get out on the news and talk about being Marxist, like really declaring themselves as Marxist, and that's kind of good news. It makes people aware. Okay, so the next video I want to play is a real quick video. It's just from Tom Fitton, but he just kind of lays out the Obamagate scandal and just kind of where we're at.
Speaker 5:Okay, I like it. It it's quick. James comey, the corrupt fbi director, discussed the dossier in the oval office with barack obama and joe biden and, of course as I affectionately call her, saint hillary of the grand jury, she paid for the dossier. No one's asked her any questions. When is barack ob, is Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton going to go under oath or maybe even be asked a tough question about their involvement when it comes to abusing the powers of office to spy on, suppress and target your political opponents? Barack Obama makes Richard Nixon seem like a kid here.
Speaker 2:Okay, so that's what we've got sitting on the Spygate scandal. I want to jump to one man. There's two other things I really want to jump to, but I'm kind of running out of my own time here. Okay, this comes from the New England Journal of Medicine and Dr Fauci was a participant in this particular study. And listen to this. This is just some highlights out of it. I'm not going to read it all, but I want to read these highlights as it pertains to masks, because a lot of us are in these mask orders. Okay, I'm just going to read the whole thing.
Speaker 2:In the past week, Dr Fauci and the New England Journal of Medicine have admitted that masks are little more than symbols virtue signaling. This is right out of the New England Journal of Medicine. For those of you who shout science like it's a turret tick, it's from the New England Journal of Medicine on May 21st 2020. Quote we know that wearing a mask outside healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact, within six feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19. That is sustained for at least a few minutes, and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes. The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic. So then the question is asked so why are we ordered to wear masks? The answer symbolism. From the same article in the New England Medical Journal or Journal of Medicine, Quote it is clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Quote it is clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers perceived sense of safety, well-being and trust in their hospitals. So it's symbolic.
Speaker 2:Now I want to play jay inslee. Yesterday. So, jay, jay inslee had a little press conference to talk about this new order wearing masks, and I mean, aside from just being completely blown away, that we're just at the point we're at in America. This was Jay Inslee's talk and I've got to fast forward to where he said what I, because you know there's a lot of introduction stuff, so give me just a second here, Okay. So here Jay Inslee is going to talk about the mask. He just got asked directly because yesterday in Lewis County, which is down in the Vancouver area just north of Portland, the sheriff basically said, after 140 days, Jay Inslee has decided oh, we should be wearing masks all of a sudden, right, I mean, this is like four months after the pandemic broke out and all of a sudden now we're being mandated to wear masks. I mean, we probably would have complied just easily during the initial first two week lockdown, but after you got the first two weeks, you don't just keep adding and adding and adding when you don't have people laying in the parking lot dead at the hospital. I mean we've got empty parking lots still, okay. So this is Jay Inslee.
Speaker 2:Remember what I just read you from the New England Journal of Medicine? Remember these are the people who are always saying follow the science, follow the science, follow the science. Well, this is Jay Inslee, being a little wise guy who is following the science. And look at the way he manipulates the reasoning here. He doesn't talk about health, he talks about the symbolism of health. Listen to it through. He's gonna use nice platitudes and nice things that might even make you go okay, okay, okay. But listen carefully. He doesn't give one legitimate health reason as to why we're wearing masks.
Speaker 6:But what motivates people to wear a face mask is, principally you don't want to hurt somebody else. You don't want to kill somebody else, you don't want to give people unknowingly a virus.
Speaker 2:Okay, so we just read the science right. You have to be symptomatic, you have to be face-to-face. So since I don't have a spitting problem and I don't spit in people's faces on a regular basis, I don't talk that close. I don't really need a mask. So the reason we wear them is we don't want to notice how he uses the word kill. Kill somebody else as if your breath is a killer breath. If you don't have symptoms, you are not probably spreading COVID. That's the science. So notice. He's saying this right, like this is the symptom, the reaction, but when does he actually provide any evidence that that happens?
Speaker 6:the symptom, the reaction, but when does he actually provide any evidence that that happens? That's what really motivates people to do this and, as increasing numbers of people realize, we can unknowingly infect a grocery store clerk I'm talking to or my grandparent that I'm visiting. As people come to understand that, that's what motivates people to wear a mask if they don't want to hurt somebody else.
Speaker 2:This is it Again? If the science was true, if the science was there, nobody would disagree. Remember, these guys bang on the table and they say science, science, science, science, science, but there's no science here. Okay, there's no science here. He hasn't said any science. He's made some. You know, you could breathe on people, but the science says that it's not contagious like that.
Speaker 2:Its main effectiveness is to raise people's consciousness about that Its main effectiveness is to raise people's consciousness, not to make you healthier, not to prevent the death that I just claimed you would cause, or the reason you want to wear the mask so you don't cause death. That's not the real reason. The real reason we're wearing it is not to actually prevent health, it's to raise our consciousness, to let people know that we don't want to kill them. Did you notice that? I read from the New England Journal of Medicine. It's quoted in there as saying it's largely symbolic. And here's RJ Inslee who follows the science and dang it he does. He's obviously read that New England Journal of Medicine article showing that masks are ineffective except as a way of symbolism. So it raises our consciousness.
Speaker 6:To give them confidence that sometimes there's some peer pressure that works.
Speaker 2:Okay so now our government is going to use peer pressure. Okay, so the government is launching a peer pressure that works. Okay, so now our government is going to use peer pressure. Okay, so the government is launching a peer pressure campaign by making everybody wear a mask to raise the awareness about this, even though it doesn't actually do anything.
Speaker 6:And to give people license to do this.
Speaker 2:You telling me you're giving my friends and neighbors and people around me license for peer pressure. I mean, I just want to. Let's just make sure we get that full sentence in there. Okay, let's make sure we hear it all.
Speaker 6:Enforce this when it takes effect on Friday. This is to raise people's consciousness about that, to give them confidence that sometimes there's some peer pressure that works, and to give people license to do this now. This is a misdemeanor. Okay, peer pressure, and it's a misdemeanor. Do not abide by this law. It is the law of the state of washington, but we believe that there will be huge voluntary compliance with this because of the peer pressure pressure, law enforcement activity will not be necessary, because we would be total hypocrites.
Speaker 6:We're looking for compliance, not citations. Now our experience today in. Washington has given us confidence about that.
Speaker 2:Because we're a deeply blue state and most people are sheep. Hence the comment from the sheriff down in Lewis County Don't be a sheep. Oh, my goodness folks, we are in crazy land. He actually did read the thing he said. This is largely symbolic. This is to raise our consciousness. No, it's not actually to prevent sickness, because it doesn't do that. It's not. This is a symbol. So here's the deal. I said it yesterday.
Speaker 2:He asked me to wear a mask. I'm going to put my Trump 2020 mask on, but there are some outs. So I want to make some people aware and I want to thank my friend She'll go by M on this show she sent. She sent me this. But a couple of things to remember.
Speaker 2:If you are a concealed carry permit holder, you can't wear a mask. It's against the law to wear a mask if you're a concealed carry permit holder. So if somebody asks, just tell them oh, I'm a concealed carry permit holder and I'm not allowed to wear a mask. First of all, that'll make them not want to confront you. So that's probably the best plan to be kept from. The peer pressure of being forced to wear a mask is the fact that you legally can't because you're locked and loaded. Ok, so get locked and loaded and if you're not, work towards that so you don't have to wear a mask.
Speaker 2:A couple other things. It's against the law for people to make you wear a mask. You're exempt from wearing a mask, mandating a mask under HIPAA. So you can say I have a medical condition and then if they ask you to disclose it, you can say, under HIPAA, I don't have to disclose it and the ADA? So that's good. You can do that Online. You can go and you can look at links. There's actually places where you can report ADA and HIPAA violations and we should I mean, we should flood the zone and this. I'm going to just get to my last little point here. Okay, I want to play this from Nancy Pelosi. This, uh, this is crazy.
Speaker 2:Just listen to this here in other words, for something to happen, they're going to have to face the realities, okay so she's talking about the police reform bill that the democrats walked away from, which would have been great, but they want to like totally defund and do things, so look at the accusation she makes here brutality, the rallies of the need for justice in policing and the recognition that there are many, many good people in law enforcement but not all, and that we have to address those concerns.
Speaker 7:So when they admit that and have some suggestions that are worthy of consideration, but so far they were trying to get away with murder, actually the murder of George Floyd.
Speaker 2:There has been another issue as far as the Did. You hear that she's blaming the murder of George Floyd and getting away with it on the Republicans' bill. What, Okay, here's Representative Jayapal who's going to support that, so this is the she's being played the quote. She's being asked the question about what Nancy Pelosi said about murder okay, about the Republicans' murder, and this is a representative here in Washington. She represents the Seattle area. How are Republicans trying to get away with murder?
Speaker 2:Well, I think if Republicans are going to insist on half measures, on things like studies about chokeholds, that is absolutely letting people get away with murder. Let me play for you Studies for chokeholds, letting people get away with murder. I'm not quite sure how that connection gets made 100%, but okay, here's another person who, addressing this murder issue. Oh, nevermind, I'll skip it, it doesn't matter. Okay, so you've got. You've got other representatives. Chuck Schumer jumped in and, uh, he said he supported what Nancy Pelosi said a hundred percent, that, uh, the president and Republicans are getting away with murder. Guys. They're claiming that we're trying to get away with murder like legit murder. They're trying to pin George Floyd on Republicans, on conservatives. If it hasn't been obvious yet, we're in a knife fight. In fact, general Flynn referenced that on Rush Limbaugh yesterday. I was in a knife fight for three years. We're in a knife fight.
Speaker 2:These people do not play by the rules. They use the rules against us. They know that we are peaceful people, us peasants I'm talking about us, the ones listening to this call or this podcast. We're peaceful people. We want good in the world. We wanna give people the benefit of the doubt. We have a Christian upbringing. We believe in the basics of the 10 commandments. Right, we can get along in society. We settle our differences. If we can't settle, we agree to disagree and we just don't associate with people that drive us crazy. That is the way it should be. These people are in our grill, they're in our faces okay, they're infiltrating our schools. They're changing the curriculum without asking, without telling us, by sneaking things in okay, they're putting communists into executive-level positions at all levels of government. It's a wolf in sheep's clothing situation, if there ever was one.
Speaker 2:If Donald Trump has done one good thing, it's exposed every one of them. He's exposed them all. General Flynn exposed them all. He said in his interview with Rush Limbaugh last night we shined a light on truth and the truth set me free Guys. This is critical. The tides have turned. The tides have turned. It is time for us to fight back.
Speaker 2:I truly believe and a lot of people have been mentioning this, like why isn't anybody pushing back? Why isn't anybody pushing back? It's because the 70%, the vast majority of people who are Americans, decent people who just want to live in peace, they're armed and they won't come out and fight with their words. They will come out and fight with their guns. It's the truth. Every single person on this podcast who has listened to my voice, I know.
Speaker 2:I know that deep down in your hearts, as you've watched rioting in our streets, as you've watched the graffiti get put on, as you've watched friends get sucked up into a Marxist movement, I know every one of you has thought to yourself at what point, at what point does the government become moot and we, the people, rule? Because the moment we, the people, rule and I've said this in multiple posts all over social media the justice will be swift and awful. The justice will be swift and awful To avoid that, to avoid the civil war. Keep in mind, folks, in Minnesota there's 1.7 million people that go out hunting every year with a deer rifle. That's 1.7 million snipers in the state of Minnesota. They don't live in Minneapolis, but they know how to hit a target and, trust me, when they descend on Minneapolis, there won't be nothing left. And I'm not saying that just to be a rabble rouser, but you've got politicians calling an entire movement murderous. You've got them ripping down our history, our statues. They've infiltrated every level of our government. Folks, we are at war. It's time we start fighting. It's time when you want to do the traditional nice thing and agree to disagree. It's time that you stand your ground. You start talking to someone that's a Marxist, you look them in the eyes and you tell them are you a Marxist? Do you believe in common property? Do you believe in collective punishment? Do you believe in collective punishment? Make them own their shame. Make them own their shame. Make them defend collective punishment. Make them defend it.
Speaker 2:Okay, there's a statue in the city where I live, because the city where we're at is, for the most part, norwegian, and so there's a Viking. There's a Viking statue and the whole community is surrounded by this Viking. It's the mascot for the most part Norwegian, and so there's a Viking. There's a Viking statue and the whole community is surrounded by this Viking. It's the mascot for the high school. Well, I got news for you Black Lives Matter protesters.
Speaker 2:Vikings held owned slaves and they owned a lot of them, and they were not nice people for the most part. You didn't want to see the Danes showing up at your doorstep. I've thought many times I'll just pull that statue down, put a little sign on it and say, oh, they were slave owners, and then make the ridiculous people in my community defend me, the absurd, or fight against me, which then I can just turn around. Well, take the Viking out of it, put anybody's name there. Why are you toppling statues? No, I'm not going to do that, and if the statue falls, don't come knocking to me because I didn't do it. Don't come knocking to me because I didn't do it, but I'm saying we've all thought about this.
Speaker 2:Guys, it's time to move into the zone where we talk. You need to be online, you need to be vocal on social media, because that's where a battle is being waged. It is an information war. And don't think things on social media don't matter, right? We need to talk to the people in our lives in person and we need to be clear about things. It's time We've got to speak up. We must turn the mirror on the people that are ruining our country. There is a group of people that are intentionally ruining our country. It's time we turn the mirror on them. They've supported crooks and criminals, crooks and criminals.
Speaker 2:We found out yesterday Barack Obama committed treason. The president says it, people have been saying it. We found the document, the smoking gun, the handwritten contemporaneous notes. This is deadly serious. It's time to stop playing nice before it gets worse. All right. On that note, if you like what I have to say and you like the show and you like the content, please share it with others. That's another way you can fight back. Share the information. You can find me on Twitter, at PeasantsPod, on Parler, at PeasantsPod, facebook at the Peasants Perspective, and you can also email me peasantspod at gmailcom. Thanks so much, guys. I look forward to talking to you later.
Speaker 1:Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would hear Please, please, good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No-one lives there. Then, who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Speaker 1:We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. All the waves he think he is.
Speaker 1:I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how did you become king then? The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 1:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. Supreme executive power Just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up. Will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
