Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Ghislaine Maxwell's Arrest: Justice Served or Half Measure?
The mechanisms of power and control are becoming increasingly evident as we examine recent events surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest and the ongoing pandemic response. What appears at first glance as justice served quickly reveals itself as a carefully orchestrated half-measure designed to placate public demand while protecting powerful interests.
Maxwell's arrest comes with peculiar timing – just one day after a federal judge ordered the destruction of evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, and eight days following the firing of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman who reportedly wanted to pursue the case aggressively. Even more telling, Maxwell faces no sex crime charges despite specific abuse incidents being described in her indictment, and the prosecutor handling the case is Maureen Comey, daughter of former FBI Director James Comey. These aren't coincidences but calculated moves in a system that protects its own.
Meanwhile, everyday Americans – the modern peasants – face increasing restrictions on their freedoms under the guise of public health concerns. States are mandating masks and canceling Independence Day celebrations while simultaneously allowing protests, exposing the hypocrisy at work. The data itself is being manipulated, with health departments changing definitions of "cases" to include not just confirmed positives but also "probable" cases based on contact tracing, artificially inflating numbers while death rates continue to decline.
The bright spot remains the economic recovery, with 4.8 million jobs added last month – news that visibly displeased many mainstream media anchors who seemed disappointed to report positive developments. This reaction further illustrates the narrative control happening across our information landscape.
What's at stake is far more than individual cases or policies – it's about whether we as citizens will continue accepting half-measures and partial truths from institutions meant to serve justice equally. As surveillance capabilities grow and freedoms shrink, the question becomes not just where your personal line is drawn, but whether enough of us will stand together when that line is crossed.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.
Speaker 2:We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Podcast. Glad to have you with me. Had a really long night last night.
Speaker 2:Gosh, you know Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested yesterday and you know you were born with a silver spoon. When your name has multiple silent letters in it, right? So Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested yesterday. And, gosh, the more I look into it, the less and less excited I am about it. The more and more I feel like this was just a slapstick indictment and that they were just trying to come up with something to put her away, mainly because of that Netflix documentary, which I'll talk about a little bit more as we get going here.
Speaker 2:So what happens a lot of times in the news is the narrative is obviously being controlled within the news. So if you're watching mainstream news, so if you're watching MSNBC, fox News, all of the cable news, mainstream news, or if you're watching even your local news, that's controlled by the big conglomerates like Bonneville or things like that. There's a kind of a narrative. So they'll pick and choose from the actual events around the country in the stories that fit their narrative and lead the country the direction they want to go. A lot of people you know it's funny, because sometimes I say things like that to people and they're like no, I mean the news is the news and it's like oh, you haven't read the CIA files, project Mockingbird. They tell you what to believe over such like oh, you don't, you don't get. The. Anderson Cooper is actually a CIA operative and it's open, like he's acknowledged the fact that his first job was in the CIA. And then, on another hand, we say, oh, once in the CIA, always in the CIA. Unless you go to CNN, then you, then you're not in the CIA. Come on, guys, once you're read in at the high levels and things like CIA, you know intelligence, things like that, you're always, always in intelligence and that's super clear. Like, for example, carter Page, who was pursued by the Mueller investigation. He was a CIA spook. He would turn over information to the CIA. Well, once you do that, you're on their radar. Don't ever think about being a double agent, because they got you and so, once CIA, always CIA, once FBI, always FBI. It's kind of the way you think about that.
Speaker 2:And so when those institutions get corrupt or being run by corrupt people, obviously sometimes you just get actions that you can't quite explain. That just don't seem rational. I mentioned talking to my brother-in-law a lot. We spent a lot of time, obviously, working together and yesterday we were having lunch and we were just talking about the events of the day and all the things that were going on and again I he I found him, you know, asking that question like well, it's not reasonable, why are they doing this? What are they doing? And I just looked at him. I said you keep asking that question. They don't have to be rational, they don't have to do things that are in the best interest of the country.
Speaker 2:Just because elected officials got elected by the people doesn't mean they want anything to do with the people. Put this in perspective for just a minute. You get elected to Congress, senate, whatever, it doesn't matter Mayor, city council, whatever it is. Now you're sitting behind the bench right, you're sitting behind the counter and you're facing the unwashed masses. So these people who voted for you right, come up to the counter and they want things that you know you can't do. They're constantly complaining. I mean, go listen to podcasts with senators and congressmen on it. Listen to their voicemails. Sometimes when they play them, the slander, the slurs Over time. Right, if you're a senator and you've been in for 18 years, three terms.
Speaker 2:You don't go to Applebee's. When was the last time you went out in public? You don't go out in public because all it takes is one dum-dum screaming at the top of his lungs to completely ruin the experience for everybody in the restaurant. So pretty soon, what you start to do is you start to go to the more exclusive or more private places. You don't ever go to public beaches. You don't go to 4th of July ceremonies and sit out in the grass with your neighbors. You don't do that when you're an elected official. You're constantly behind the counter, you're separated from the people and give enough time and you start to see the people on the other side of the counter as, somehow, others.
Speaker 2:This is where you get Hillary Clinton saying things like the deplorables, the unredeemables. How could you possibly say that about your constituents? How could you possibly say that about Americans? Right To just wipe off half of the population as deplorables and unredeemables? Well, it's because you haven't associated with them. In 30, 40 years. You haven't gone to a picnic, you haven't gone to a barbecue, and you know what. We see the same thing too with our local, local departments.
Speaker 2:My, my little town has has had the longest running 4th of July parade since ever at West of the Mississippi, so it's the longest continuously running. They had the 4th of July during world war one. They had the 4th of July during world war two, the great depression. They've always had this little cute 4th of July parade. It's canceled this year for COVID. What's frustrating about that is you know it's all a scam, right? You know that there's no reason why we couldn't have the 4th of July parade. Nobody said boo where I live about the protests. We had hundreds and hundreds of people at least as many people show up to the Black Lives Matter protest in the little town where I live as will show up at the parade. But yet we can't do the parade. They want to cancel it. The hypocrisy is just unbelievable, and I actually don't. It's so Okay.
Speaker 2:So I was saying with the news cycle, let me back up again with the news cycle. So the news right now is picking and choosing some narratives, but there's way more news than you're ever going to get on the news and I really can't cover it all here. But what's happening right now is we've got what I consider another foundation dump, so we're moving into a new phase of the news. The news cycle is now going to have to address everything that has happened over the last 48 hours and it will take them a couple months to do it. This is really typically what happens when you get a huge shift in the actual facts of reality, when reality cannot be ignored, then you have to shape the narrative to absorb that reality. I hope you understand what I'm saying there.
Speaker 2:So facts happen, events happen, things happen that can't be changed. Both sides of the aisle have to look at it and say, for example, ghislaine Maxwell is in custody. Okay, what are the ramifications of that? What do we do? How do we craft our message? How do we spin our story? Both sides of the aisle right now are doing this rapidly. They're doing as much research as they can. They're developing talking points that they can distribute to their surrogates to try to get their narrative and their message out there.
Speaker 2:I don't know what those narratives and messages are. I've got some good guesses, but I've got a feeling they're going to kind of be, they're going to change, and there's a couple, there's a lot of reasons for that. So let me start with a couple things that are not Maxwell related. So yesterday we had a bunch of excuse me, yesterday we had a bunch of financial news that came out as well, so let's take a minute and look at that. So the jobs report came out and we added a ton of jobs back into the economy. Now, when I shared this with someone yesterday, they said is that new jobs like new manufacturing? And I was like, no, no, these are probably 90% just people going back to work. But you have to remember these people were laid off, they weren't working. So the fact that people are going back to work is a big deal because the gravy train of unemployment runs out. So listen to this video.
Speaker 2:This is Rachel Maddow. Starts out this video and on Wednesday night on her show, which she's in prime time, I think she's across from Hannity on MSN, msn, msnbc, yeah, whatever it is. Anyways, I can't stand her. People call her Moscow Maddow or conspiracy theorist Maddow. She is one of the biggest pundits that was pushing the Russiagate hoax. I mean, she just the walls are caving in. The walls are caving in constantly. It's actually quite astonishing to me that she's still on the air.
Speaker 2:The currency that journalists work with is truthfulness, trust. I don't consider myself a journalist. I can throw something out there. That's not true, you know. I mean because I'm just working through this. I'm a peasant. I'm just like you, right? I don't have insider information. I'm not sitting in the seats of power, I'm just watching it across the internet and I'm very concerned with what I'm seeing. So I'm going to talk about it.
Speaker 2:So this is Moscow Maddow and she's uh, she's, she's talking about the jobs numbers and she must've got a bad tip. I mean, these people do get, do get tips. They are connected, uh, that you know they absolutely could get an insider tip so they know how to craft their story and break news and things like that. I think she got a bad tip. I personally think she got a bad tip. I think somebody on the inside was either screwing with her or they had something happen. She had a bad tip. Anyways, she starts out. This was Wednesday night that she starts out, and then everything else is yesterday morning as the jobless numbers came out. So just take a look at this. It's kind of fun For June, brace yourself, it's going to be absolutely terrible.
Speaker 3:Blockbuster jobs report. 4.8 million jobs were added last month. 4.8 million nearly 5 million jobs in june. People are hiring 4.8 million new jobs. 4.8 million jobs were added last month. It actually beat estimates by a wide margin, is way more than the 3 million economists expected, and it speaks to the strength of the economy. This is news to celebrate. It is unequivocally good news. So it's a big positive to see this much higher. I see a number to be celebrated Adding 404,000 jobs for African Americans, 1.5 million for Hispanics, 3 million for women, and it was the biggest jump on record. We built the greatest economy in the history of the world and we are now doing it again.
Speaker 2:All right, that's a fun that Donald Trump tweeted that out. It's going to be. Probably it's a campaign ad of his, I'm sure. So I've commented where I've seen this video out there. It's so funny because a lot of the anchors that are talking are on, you know, msnbc, cnn, abc, things like that, and it's like it's like they're they're eating their Ipecac. You know they're. They're reading the news like, uh, job numbers are at 4.8 and they look up at the camera and they have that droopy look on their face where their their mouth doesn't is completely, completely relaxed and they're just like crap. It's a V-shaped recovery Crap. There's no job numbers were good. Crap is kind of you. Look at their faces. It's really funny. I like Kramer in there. People are hiring. I love it. Anyways, it's great news. People, you gotta love it. You gotta love that people are going back to work. That was big news yesterday. Um, that's nice, you know, and again, these are just people going back to work. But this is good. People need to go back to work. People that are working don't write and protest. People that are working can pay their bills. People that are working can keep. You know, there's just good stuff all the way around. So definitely, definitely want to watch that.
Speaker 2:There was a couple things that happened yesterday that I thought were absolutely I wanted to mention. So you got to remember, donald Trump is the leader of the free world, he is the president of the United States and typically, you know, the things that they say carry a lot of weight. And one of the things that I have really appreciated with Donald Trump is he backs up his words. When he says something on Twitter, he means it. I mean, shoot for goodness sakes, he fired Rex Tillerson, the Secretary of State, when he was on an overseas trip in Africa. Through Twitter, he just tweeted out Rex Tillerson, you're an idiot, you're gone, fired. And Rick Tillerson was like oh, okay. So I like the fact that Donald Trump says things.
Speaker 2:One of the other things, too, is Donald Trump's tweets are incredibly accurate. The media constantly, you know, says that it's not and uh. That's really quite frustrating because he's kind of proven to always end up being correct. Um, but you know it doesn't matter what if he's correct or not, people are just going to be cranky about it. So yesterday Donald Trump tweeted out quite a bit with uh, with one specific uh.
Speaker 2:He was retweeting an account and this account was America First account. Let me, I'm trying to find it here. He tweeted a lot yesterday. Okay, so it was Act for America. So ACT for America was an account he retweeted and he retweeted out a handful of things.
Speaker 2:He tweeted out a picture. It says here it's a picture of Joe Biden hanging his head and it says, fast and Furious Benghazi, irs targeting, operation Chokepoint, spying on journalists, va waiting list, cash payments to Iran, clinton emails, unmasking of political rivals, crossfire, hurricane, slash Russia hoax, crossfire razor, slash General Flynn. So those are the scandals that Biden was directly involved with in the Obama administration. So Trump tweeted that out. I love it. I mean, he constantly calls the Obama administration out on their crap. Here's another tweet from him that he retweeted Imagine if the left was focused on coronavirus instead of impeachment back in January, oh burn. There's another one he retweeted Barack Obama and Joe Biden left federal stockpiles empty and exposed our country, so referring to the PPEs country. So, referring to the PPEs um, if you love our freedom, stand with Donald Trump, retreat that.
Speaker 2:Now, this is the one that I just I've been I've been laughing at. When he tweeted this out, I just thought, folks, if you are a Trump fan. Okay, if you are a Trump fan, he is signaling to you. He is telling you what is going to come. He is absolutely purposely doing what he's doing. This is from his Twitter.
Speaker 2:It's a Twitter poll. Now, this Twitter poll when I saw it was closed, most likely it was closed either before he tweeted it. No, I don't think it was closed before he tweeted it. It probably got closed when he tweeted it. I'm sure Twitter shut it down if I had to guess, but nonetheless, it doesn't have a lot of votes. It's only 2,800 votes. If Trump had put it out there with an open poll, I'm sure it'd have millions of votes.
Speaker 2:But here's the question who do you trust most? And the two questions President Trump, dr Fauci. So President Trump retweets a poll saying who do you trust more, president Trump or Dr Fauci? Oh, my goodness. Now the poll is 90.2% Donald Trump and 9.8% Dr Fauci. Now it's only got 2,800 respondents, so it's Twitter poll, but nonetheless, oh man, what is Donald Trump trying to tell us Really, truly, what is he trying to tell us? Do you think he's trying to tell us that Fauci's full of crap, that Fauci shouldn't be trusted? Really, truly, people, the president of the United States is tweeting out a poll with huge favor to him against his director of infectious disease, okay, who has been basically spearheading the coronavirus hoax. Oh man, this is good. This is rich. This is one for the ages. I love that. I love it.
Speaker 2:So, anything that you're being asked to do by a medical professional that's quoting Dr Fauci, just remind them that Dr Fauci does not have Donald Trump's back. Donald Trump does not have Dr Fauci's back. I just, I can't. It just makes me laugh so much. Another thing I mentioned it yesterday, but the USMCA is now live. That's a really big deal. That's going to have wide-ranging economic impacts. I am actually really excited to see. You know, donald Trump said third and fourth quarter we're going to be good this year, probably because you know you've got the USMCA going and you've got, overall, most of the countries opening up.
Speaker 2:Now, as far as masks go, I cannot believe like Idaho is mandating masks starting on the 4th of July. Folks, there's a meme floating around and I believe it's so true. If you're being told that you can't celebrate the 4th of July or you have to wear a mask, you've completely missed the point of Independence Day. You've completely missed the point. Republicans, who have sold their souls are asking you to wear masks, to limit your public gatherings, to limit your parties, to cancel parades and public activities. On July 4th Keep in mind the president is holding a rally at Mount Rushmore, so the president's not bothered by a crowd. Why are we? We've got to ask ourselves these questions. We've got to ask who it is that we're entrusting to tell us what to do and why we're doing it.
Speaker 2:Here's what my great fear is In Washington State, jay Inslee has just changed the mandate for masks. At first it was just okay, you got to wear masks. It's a misdemeanor, a little fine, but we're not going to force it. We're not going to force it, but we want people to peer pressure each other. I know he really meant it. He wants to instigate peer pressure amongst his population. That's unbelievably egregious to me. I mean, it's just egregious. We tell people you know bullies who use peer pressure. We tell them not to do it, but yet here you are being a bully, mr Jay Inslee. Seriously, like by every definition of the word, you're encouraging bullying and it's going to get people hurt. People are going to get hurt over these mask dictates Because some people are so passionate about quote unquote health, that they completely forget the fact that give me liberty or give me death.
Speaker 2:There are people out there that believe that, including myself. If you're going to push me that far, eventually I'm going to fight back with everything I got, and there's a lot of Americans that are going to start feeling the same way. You're starting to see it. You're starting to see the videos pop up of anti-maskers people who don't want to wear masks, just losing it at stores and things like that. It's going to get worse before it gets better. There has to be a tipping point where the government, who's telling people to have these rules, says it's not worth it, and that only is going to happen with the masses just taking off the mask, literally. So, anyways, what Jay Inslee has done is he has now mandated that businesses enforce the rules. So he's using businesses and threatening their business licensing, threatening them with closure in order to enforce these mask rules.
Speaker 2:So, essentially, you've got I always think of the parable of the 10 virgins in the Bible right. You got the 10 virgins. Some of them have their oil, some of them don't have their oil, and then the bridegrooms comes late at night and those that don't have enough oil to make it through the night, have to rush out to those that buy and sell, but those that buy and sell are closed and so they can't get enough and then they show up late to the party. I always think of that in this situation. Here we have a situation where we're essentially in waiting, right, we're in waiting for salvation, and I'm not saying we're waiting for the second coming. I'm saying we're just waiting for November 4th. We're waiting for the economy to pick up. We're waiting for salvation.
Speaker 2:We're at a point right now where we need people who are elected, who have power and control the levers of influence, and control and influence of levers of power actually work in our interest. Control and influence of levers of power actually work in our interest. If that doesn't happen, what's? You know? We're stuck, we're sitting ducks, we're peasants. In my intro I have the phrase you know. You watch those videos with the kings and queens, except they accidentally say kings and kings, I think. But the kings and queens riding around and they've making all these decisions about their people. Well, you know who we are. We're the blacksmith that's in the background just banging away on the on the on the anvil day after day. We're the farmer out in the field just picking hay every day, day after day. That's us. That's us.
Speaker 2:We have to live under whatever regime sits in those seats of power and has power, and we're getting to a point where, technologically, we'll never be able to retake the state. I mean, they've got satellites, like if you go to the city of Baltimore, they have a satellite that has a camera focused on the entire metropolitan of Baltimore that takes one single photograph at a megapixel. That's like 40 billion megapixels or some crazy, crazy quality picture, and it takes a picture every second. And what that allows them to do is track every single thing that happens in a city. You want to drive a car from point A to point B If you rob a store, and then you go make your getaway and you're like, oh, the helicopters aren't following me, these aren't following me. They have an eye in the sky, a permanent eye in the sky. In Baltimore they could eliminate all crime overnight. Because they're such a police state they choose not to do it. They're running those experiments, their control experiments, and Baltimore was one of the cities to do it.
Speaker 2:So you think about that in terms of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment will save you from the mob. The Second Amendment will save you from an assaulter. The Second Amendment will not save you from the state. The Second Amendment won't save you from the state unless we team up, band together, form coalitions. But then you got to remember the fact they're not letting you gather in groups of more than 10. They're not letting you gather in your civic organizations. They're limiting all of that.
Speaker 2:I know I'm kind of going on a tangent, but we're going down a slippery slope. Donald Trump trust Donald Trump, don't trust Dr Fauci. These medical people are just out of their minds. Here's another little video. We're going to jump onto this video before I get back into some of this Epstein stuff. I don't want to spend. The Epstein stuff is heavy. It's so heavy because it well, as I'll talk about later it makes me feel that maybe justice is not quite being served, that we're going to get a little half measure of justice, something to just placate the masses, and that really just makes me sad. I don't know what else to say about it.
Speaker 2:So let me jump over here to the coronavirus situation with the rising numbers. So we keep hearing the coronavirus cases are going up and more people are getting it and it's funny, you notice. No one's talking about the fact that the death rate is plummeting, right? No one's dying from coronavirus anymore, they're just getting it and that's a result of the testing. Now we've talked about the fact that the CDC admitted that they made a mistake on the antibody testing and the virus testing. They were counting people twice.
Speaker 2:Then we got another report that they confirmed that people who have been tested multiple times so let's say you do get coronavirus and you're put in the hospital. Every single time they administer you a test it's considered a new case. So in some cases you're getting tested every day. Two, three days. You're in the hospital for two weeks. You are now seven new cases. So that was something that came up.
Speaker 2:And what's happening is, as the virus spreads to rural hospitals where they don't maybe have as tight a control over the minds of the doctors and the nurses what you nurses They'll have one single case of coronavirus. But then they realize that they are reporting seven cases because they're having to test that person over and over again and they're going hey, we don't have seven new cases, we have one person that still has it, and so you see how these numbers start to multiply. Then you've got the contact tracing. Where they start doing a contact, they count the people that potentially could be contact tracing. So this is a little video that we're going to watch and there's graphics that go with it, but I think she walks through it pretty well. So this is that they're changing the goal, they're moving the goalposts, they're changing the rules on us. Again, listen to how she explains this.
Speaker 3:New definitions for designating COVID-19 cases has been distributed by the Department of State Health Services in Texas. In this document you'll see that we have current case definitions and, prior to the new case status definition, a person must have a positive result for COVID-19. So therefore, this is sort of the person with COVID-19. All these people are not marked as COVID-19.
Speaker 2:So the original definition you had to actually have a test that came positive for COVID-19 in order to be confirmed. So she's pointing out of things total cases, one confirmed, and then everybody in the contact tracing sphere wasn't counted as a case.
Speaker 3:One confirmed case. They do a new case definition where they include people with close contact or confirm probable cases, and then you go down to sort of how they are defining probable cases. It can be people that are in close contact and have symptoms. So basically there are now 15 different options for a person to be classified as a probable case and the new probable case definition basically has this person as well as all of these other people. So total cases 17. One confirmed, 16 probable. Are public health agencies deliberately manipulating data to inflate cases and cause hysteria? It sure seems that way.
Speaker 2:So she was on the Department of Health for the state of Texas's website going through their flow chart on explaining it, and because they changed the definition, you went from a situation where you had to have a confirmed positive case in order to report to. They changed the definition of a case to a probable case, which means all the numbers that you're seeing are probable cases. And then they're probable cases where they add on the contact tracing. So every one case that doesn't even have to be test confirmed if you go to the doctor with the sniffles, they can then trigger the contact tracing count and they can count you as a probable case even though you haven't had a test. And then they can count up to 16 people in your sphere or people in your household. They can just start adding people to the list. That is why you're seeing a quote-unquote spike and a surge in all kinds of random places across the country. It's because they're changing the rules. They're changing the way we count these cases and the other thing too is they're completely changing the way we look at this.
Speaker 2:Remember we started out as flatten the curve. We can't forget this, folks. It was just a few months ago. They were talking about flattening the curve. We were worried about overwhelming our hospital systems and I was completely on board with that, looking at what I was seeing in Italy and Iran and Wuhan, china. Yeah, I don't want that in my backyard. I don't want our hospitals to be overrun. But the moment we realized that our hospitals didn't need to be overrun, that we didn't need all those ventilators, that the people mainly dying were in these nursing homes and you could isolate those nursing homes, we should have just opened this economy back up and gone for it.
Speaker 2:It's really been hard to watch what's been happening. I see a lot of people getting frustrated. I see a lot of people wanting to take action, but, more than anything, I see a lot of people giving in and being complacent. It breaks my heart when I see people in stores with a face mask, especially people I know and I'm close to that, I know support the cause of freedom and liberty, because it's almost like you're just giving them the power you're giving in. I don't know where your line is. I don't know if you're going to stand beside me and and and be there for me when, when I challenge the state right, when I say no, I won't put that mask on, or when I say no, I won't do this, or or no, I'm not going to let my kids get a vaccine. I don't know the people who are close to me who, I think, love liberty and freedom. I don't know if they're going to have my back because they don't have their own back. It's very concerning. I mean, it's just something to consider and think about. Right, it's something to consider and think about. Okay, so enough on the COVID for now.
Speaker 2:All right, let's jump into this, ghislaine Maxwell's case. So let's go through a little bit of a timeline here. So Epstein was arrested in like 2013. He was arrested. He got like 14 months of sentencing. It was a joke. I think I don't really want to cover exactly what happened there. It was just kind of a joke. He basically had a really easy sentence, especially compared to the sexual crimes he had done, the trafficking, all the things that he was involved with. All of his co-conspirators got off. In that case. There were a lot of co-conspirators that were named. No one else was charged. No one else was charged.
Speaker 2:Now I have to say I want to play this. There is going to be a narrative that's put out there as Ghislaine Maxwell continues to have pressure put on her and as the Epstein case continues to go forward. Obviously Epstein is deeply involved with the Clintons and I'm going to show you something here in a second that's going to make your mind kind of blow a little bit. But people are trying to connect Trump with Epstein and there is something to that. Trump and Epstein are connected. Let me explain how these connections go.
Speaker 2:Trump's a baller. Trump's a big player. He's a big spender. He's got nice properties, all that kind of stuff. So is Epstein. Trump has made his money.
Speaker 2:Epstein was pretty much given his money. Epstein didn't really do anything to earn it. I think that's pretty apparent in the Netflix documentary that they put out there on him. So at one point Donald Trump was pretty cash poor. He was asset rich but cash poor, which is not unusual for real estate tycoons. I mean, really think about that. They've got assets but they don't always have a lot of cash on hand because it takes a lot of capital to actually build and make those assets.
Speaker 2:And at one point the Mar-a-Lago estate was either up for sale or there was an adjoining property to Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. I'm not super clear on the details, they don't matter, but essentially Trump and Epstein got into a real estate squabble. So Epstein was trying to buy this parcel out from under Donald Trump because Donald Trump didn't have the cash to buy it and Epstein was basically just flaunting his cash, I think it was. He was trying to buy an adjoining property to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate and Donald Trump ended up getting the money to buy the land from Deutsche Bank. So when you hear about, you know, oh, we want Deutsche Bank records and things like that. A lot of that has to do with trying to figure out how Donald Trump was able to get this land out from under Jeffrey Epstein In this same time frame.
Speaker 2:Jeffrey Epstein, who was a member of the Mar-a-Lago club or was allowed in I don't know if he was an official member or just allowed in, because he always let a billionaire through the front door he assaulted a 14-year-old daughter of one of the staff members at the club. Donald Trump found out about this. Donald Trump banned him for life from Mar-a-Lago. And also that is right then, where you hear Donald Trump and there's that quote where Donald Trump says, yeah, I know Jeffrey Epstein, he's a lot like me, he likes the ladies, but I hear he likes them a little younger People don't understand that statement.
Speaker 2:Billionaires, don't call out other billionaires, they don't do that. Every billionaire's got skeletons, things they've done that they shouldn't have done. You know the power corrupts, let's just put it that way so you don't hear a lot of billionaires out there saying, oh, so-and-so committed tax fraud or you know, throwing each other's stuff out there, because usually you know one finger points at them, three fingers point back at you kind of situation. So when Donald Trump said, oh, he likes him younger, that was like a big deal that sent shockwaves in the community Epstein was in, because that was the first time that somebody had publicly stated that Jeffrey Epstein was into young girls, like literally into minors. And you can't take that statement and say, oh, this is Donald Trump endorsing it or laughing about it. That was Donald Trump being a belligerent asshole to Jeffrey Epstein. That's what that was. That was not a nicety, something that was cutesy not at all.
Speaker 2:Now there's other videos of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, kind of at some kind of party get together. It doesn't matter, the shoe has to fit on both feet. Just because you have a picture of Jeffrey Epstein and some famous person doesn't necessarily mean they are entangled in anything nefarious. Obviously, bad people walk amongst us. You probably have associated with bad people too and had no idea they were bad. It doesn't make you bad, so we have to be a little bit careful.
Speaker 2:Just because someone flew on Epstein's plane doesn't mean that they're bad. Right, you've got to find some other supporting evidence. The fact that they flew on his plane fits nicely in the narrative when you start finding other evidence, just but the sheer fact that he flew on their plane doesn't matter. Another thing Donald Trump did fly on Jeffrey Epstein's plane. Jeffrey Epstein owns two planes.
Speaker 2:Jeffrey Epstein took a flight from Daytona beach back to New York city with Jeffrey Epstein's son, not with Jeffrey Epstein. Now I explained to you before about uh flights previously, cause I had a friend who had a personal jet and when they fly, a lot of times they rent out the flies. A lot of times these guys will hitch rides. I mean, it's very expensive to fly a jet. So even if you own a jet, like Donald Trump, for whatever reason, he was in Daytona Beach without his jet, so he caught a ride back with a fellow jet setter. Not really a big deal, you know, it's not really a big deal, but the shoe has to fit on both feet. So remember that Just because someone was on his flight doesn't necessarily make it nefarious. Now, if they've got no connections, I think it's kind of a big deal that John Roberts remember the names.
Speaker 2:Who's that? If you don't recognize it yet, you need to. He's the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It does bother me that John Roberts was on his Lolita Express plane going down to his island. Yeah, that makes me want to ask some questions. So how do you ask the Chief Justice those questions? That's the question that we peasants have to ask is how do we ask him that question? Feels like Bill Barr needs to step up to the plate for that. So here's another little video, and this was an attorney for Virginia Goofrey, who basically was the one who got Epstein indicted and put in jail the first time. And this is what he said about Donald Trump specifically. But also take a note, I've seen the long form of this interview no one else that he subpoenaed responded. No one else. He had to go fight for statements. Donald Trump volunteers. But hear it in his own words this is the attorney for the victim of Epstein, who was pursuing civil suits after this.
Speaker 4:Without it being totally authentic?
Speaker 5:Yeah, absolutely. Now just one more question on that document, and this goes to the more salacious rumors, but I would like you to just whatever you can say on it. Obviously, our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and there are those Katie Johnson and maybe other victims who have accused Trump of being involved in things like this. In my experience, Okay, katie Johnson.
Speaker 2:Katie Johnson, in 2016, said that Epstein and Trump raped her when she was a 13 or 14-year-old child, or whatever it was, and she filed a civil suit to do this. First of all, she wasn't outside of the statute of limitations. She absolutely could have filed a criminal complaint. She chose not to. She hired an attorney who's a known Trump hater, who then filed this complaint. Then the dates didn't line up with certain things and they actually ended up dropping the complaint. It was a complaint. It was purely for political purposes. It would never have been filed if Donald Trump wasn't running for president. It was purely something to try to tie Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein in court documents. It really is a sad abuse of just the way the judicial system works just getting it submitted into court, so it's submitted, and then turning around and dropping it because you have no supporting evidence. I mean, it's, it's really bad, but that's what happened. So that's what he's referencing.
Speaker 5:Trump supporters will not listen to anything along those lines. Obviously, we're not a court of law here right now, but are those claims of those? Though? That case was dropped. It was dropped before it went to court. In your opinion as a lawyer and your experience, is there anything you can say as to the validity of those claims or whether or not there will be any more about that?
Speaker 4:Nothing at all. The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people that I was going, that I wanted to talk to them, he is the only person who picked up the phone and said let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us, and that we didn't have to take a deposition of him. And that was in 2009? That was in 2009.
Speaker 5:Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of the Mar-a-Lago? I've definitely heard that.
Speaker 4:I definitely heard that. I don't know that it was Trump himself, as opposed to a manager there Trump's club. So, yeah, trump. I've heard the rumor that Epstein was kicked out of there for allegedly trying to pick up somebody's daughter or something like that, but I think I did chase that down as far as I could and never was able to confirm it, but I heard I'm on the same same boat with that.
Speaker 2:So that's Donald Trump and Epstein in a nutshell. Right, there's going to be pictures of Donald Trump, because you got to remember the rich and powerful. They go together, they take pictures. The shoes got to fit on both feet. You can't look at a Democrat and say, oh, you went to a fundraiser with so-and-so, no, no, no. That by itself is not enough. It's just part of the story. So the fact that Trump knew Epstein, of course they both lived in Florida and they're both billionaires. Right, like you kind of know the ballers in your neighborhood, you know, it's just the way it goes. So it's really no surprise that Trump and Epstein knew each other. Now let me go through a couple other things here. Let me contrast that with, say, the Clintons. So this is really interesting. I love this little deal here.
Speaker 2:So these are headlines just ripped right out of the news over a series of years, and they're assembled by Mike Bravo. So hat tip to Mike Bravo on Twitter. I really like this thread, but this is the thread and these are again. These are headlines, these are. I'm going to read the network or the news source and then I'm going to read the headline Okay, newspunchcom. And all of these headlines you will find multiple reports on the same story. Because news happens, everybody breaks it. So these are just kind of a smattering of headlines, but they're all accredited. Journalists Like these are all you know. They make a living doing journalism, so they're not going to be. They're not. They're not a salacious pie in the sky. Tabloids Although tabloids gosh man. They seem to get a lot more credible as time goes on. Okay, newspunchcom Bill Clinton's pal arrested for child sex trafficking.
Speaker 2:One of Bill Clinton's friends, a mega donor to Clinton Foundation, keith Raniere, has been arrested on child sex trafficking charges. Wow, okay. So now we come over here and we go. That really stinks, that's really not cool. And we go down a little further and we go. Oh, here's New York Post, another headline. New York Post says Bill Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Orgy Island. Netflix doc says it's like we knew he went down there for years and years, but until the documentary it wasn't confirmed. So the Netflix doc went down to orgy island. A new witness claims Bill Clinton spent time with pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein at the financier's notorious orgy island. Okay, well, that's pretty crazy. So he knows the Rainiers from Next VM, the sex cult, and Good Friend right, good Friend is in the headline. And then here you go, one of Bill Friend's, clint's and mega donor Clinton Foundation. Oh, sorry, that was the same headline. That was the Keith Rainier one. So that was New York Post. Then we come down here CNBC this is a good one. Cnbc this is yesterday.
Speaker 2:Jeffrey Epstein, friend Ghislaine Maxwell, arrested on child sex abuse, conspiracy and perjury charges. Actually, she wasn't arrested on child sex abuse and that's something I'm going to talk about later. Actually, I'll just talk about it right now, just in case I forget it, because sometimes I get going and I forget a little point that I need to make. There's a specific incident of sex abuse cited in her indictment, but she's not charged with any sex crimes, I know right. So they're putting a sex crime in the indictment but no charges for sex crimes, which means she will do a max of 10 years in jail for the crimes that she's been accused of. Maybe they can pile on the charges and run them all concurrently or run them back to back, so she does spend the rest of her life in jail, but the reality is she's probably not going to get more than 10 years because there's no sex crimes that she's being charged with. They can add them later. They can add them later. She is in custody. They can keep going as they do discovery and uncover evidence, but that's going to be a problem, as I'm going to point out here in just a minute. So Jeffrey Epstein, tied to Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein.
Speaker 2:Okay, here's another headline ripped right from the news here. This is a gov banknoteswordpresscom, so this is actually a Kosovo website. This is out of Kosovo. But check this out. Kosovo indictment proves Bill Clinton's Serbian atrocity, so this is actually a different one. Bill Clinton's favorite freedom fighter just got indicted for mass murder, torture, kidnapping and other crimes against humanity. This was Bill Clinton's buddy and this was the Kosovo president, hashim Fassi. He was arrested on war crimes. Okay, well, that's good company to keep, okay. So then we come to one more headline that you'll recognize this name. This is from TimeMagazinecom, so Timecom is from time magazinecom, so timecom. Harvey Weinstein alleged uh uh. Harvey Weinstein arrested for charges of rape, sex abuse and more disgraced, movie producer Harvey Weinstein was arrested in New York Friday on uh charges of rape. Who's a known friend of the Clintons man? You know, you start my dad.
Speaker 2:I think I told the story before one time when I was a kid I was on a bus and we had a substitute teacher and I was. I was a good kid. I was a really good kid in elementary school. I remember one time, like in my second or third grade class, I had two different times where I had the same teachers for two grades. So sometimes I can't know if I I don't know who was in the class to remember what grade I was in. Second, third and fourth and fifth I had the same teacher. I had second, third, I had the same teachers. Fourth, fifth, I had the same teachers, different schools. But in third and fourth grade I remember we were sitting around and we were getting grades.
Speaker 2:You don't get A Bs and Cs, you get, like you know, other letters. So an E was excellent and you get an E if you're excellent at something. And there was a. One of the grades was like class behavior or something like that. She's like who in the class? My teacher just asked who in the class has the best behavior and almost simultaneously the whole class said Taylor, I was a pretty kind little kid.
Speaker 2:I wasn't mean to people. I wasn't a bully ever. I never, ever picked on anybody. I moved so much. I went to 16 schools by the time I graduated high school. So I couldn't be a bully. If I was a bully I wasn't going to have friends. I had to be a nice guy. I had to learn how to make friends every single year, um, you know, all the time on a frequent basis. So I was just never. I was never a bully. I was nice to every single person I ever met until I became an adult, and now I can kind of go off on people, but especially people close to me. So anyways, uh, that okay. So I was in second or third grade. No, I was in fourth grade. Dang it, man, wrong grade. Anyways, I was in fourth grade. But the point of the other story was I was a good kid, so I was in my fourth grade class. It was fourth grade, so I was in my fourth grade class and I got on. So I was like 10, 11, somewhere in that age range Got on a bus, sitting on the back of the bus and the kids at the very back of the bus, like the the back two rows, were yelling, fighting, playing whatever.
Speaker 2:They were throwing stuff back and forth across the aisle and it was making the substitute teacher on the bus driver driver really annoyed and nervous. So they started kind of getting upset and they said you know, they, they. They told the guys in the back of the bus, everybody on the back of the bus, you're going to get in trouble, so got off the bus. Everybody gets up, we walk out of the bus and she stops the back. I think I was on the bench by myself, it wasn't a super full bus, anyways, she stops everybody in the back and me.
Speaker 2:So I wasn't involved in any of the activity that was going on. I was just kind of in my own little world and she stopped me, lined us up against the bus. She berated us, told us we were all going to get in trouble and called our parents, called her parents. My dad was super upset. That I was, you know, given this teacher a hard time and I think part of it was I started talking back once they started accusing me of of being involved or I was trying to deny it. It doesn't matter. The point is I got grounded for a whole month. A whole month. It was like, are you kidding me? I got grounded for a whole month.
Speaker 2:And uh, my dad said and it was the first time I heard it, I heard it many, many times again the rest of my life guilty by association, taylor, you're guilty by association. Don't associate with people that are doing things that you don't want to get wrapped up in. And that's what I think of when I think of this Bill Clinton situation. You're guilty by association, you know. Look at all these people. These aren't little cases, these are big cases Human war crimes. You've got human trafficking and child sex abuse, all of them. I mean. Look at the company that Bill Clinton has been keeping and this is intimate company, this is over and over again that he's with these people. It's really quite incredible. Okay, so that's kind of the two shoes, right, you've got to look at both shoes. Look at the difference between Donald Trump's interactions with Bill Clinton, or with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and look at the Bill Clinton and his involvement with not only Epstein but Weinstein, keith Rainier, and there's others too. There's others that are still, that have been arrested, that are not necessarily like the big name American ringleaders. So, okay, so that's, that's going on Now. Now let me point something else out that's quite freaky. Let me look at the time, this recent timeline of events that have happened I've covered on this podcast, jeff Berman, jeffrey Berman, who was fired from the Southern District of New York.
Speaker 2:He was appointed by judges to be the district attorney for the Southern District of New York. Now I've heard mixed reports, but I'm starting to think that the reports land on the latter. I've heard reports that he didn't want to prosecute any Epstein cases, he didn't want to go after the Clinton Foundation. He's been sitting on the Wiener laptop, that he just did not want to pursue these cases. However, now we're getting report that seemed fairly credible that Berman actually wanted to throw the book at these people, that he wanted to pursue these cases but was being stopped by the Department of Justice in Washington DC. Who was stopping him? I don't know. I don't know if it was as high as Barr or who it is, but usually cases aren't going to make it up to Barr until they're ready to do charging and really these district attorneys have all the power. I mean he can bring the charges. So the fact that he's being stopped, somebody was stopping him. He was fired. His deputy has moved up into his position, so his deputy, who was also probably sitting on these cases or whatever, has moved up.
Speaker 2:Now this happened on Wednesday, so on July 1st. This is a headline from Big League Politics and you can find this similar headline on pretty much all the news sources, but it's not being very reported because it's again. There's no conspiracies, but there's also no coincidences. So nine days ago Berman gets fired. Supposedly Berman wants to throw the book at Ghislaine Maxwell, the Clinton Foundation, everybody else. Supposedly he's being told not to do that. He gets fired. Okay, he gets fired. Now you've got this federal judge. So this was on Wednesday. The headline Federal judge orders Epstein victims' lawyers to destroy court docs related to Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge is ordering the documents that are in the possession of the attorneys in the Southern District of New York who brought charges against Jeffrey Epstein to destroy all documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Federal judges ordered the attorneys of Jeffrey Epstein victims of Virginia Goofery to destroy documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein confidant who has been frequently named as his former collaborator in sex child trafficking.
Speaker 2:A senior US District Judge, loretta Preska. Remember the name? We're going to have to remember that name. Now we're going to have to find out a little bit about who she is, what she's all about. Who appointed her? Because she has made an interesting decision here. Who appointed her because she has made an interesting decision here. This is kind of like Judge Sullivan, who now we know is a totally corrupt criminal and it makes total sense now why he's completely ruining the Flynn case, right. It makes sense when you understand how corrupt he is and his connections. Then you see why he's willing to go out on a limb and do something that just doesn't make any sense from a legal perspective. So here we go, judge Loretta Preska we're going to have to start remembering her name, watching for her to pop up in the news. She made the determination in lawsuits Gufri and her attorneys Cooper and Kirk have filed against Maxwell and former Epstein attorney Alan Dershowitz. Preska rejected Dershowitz's attempt to change a protective order to receive documents for his defense in the defamation case, while ordering Gufri's attorneys to destroy documents from a previously settled case involving Maxwell. So Dershowitz has been accused of sex crimes.
Speaker 2:Dershowitz was Alan Dershowitz. He was on Trump's legal defense team during impeachment. He's a real, true, deep liberal, but he does believe in the US Constitution. He's a huge civil rights defense attorney. He's a professor at Harvard, so he's kind of one of those guys where the shoe does fit on both feet with him. He does look at things rationally. I do think that Dershowitz has a good legal mind. However, it doesn't mean that Alan Dershowitz isn't going to try to protect his own personal interests, which is something that we've seen on multiple occasions. Nonetheless, his own personal interests which is something that we've seen on multiple occasions.
Speaker 2:Nonetheless, alan Dershowitz did go down to Epstein's Island with his wife and Dershowitz claims that nothing ever happened. He never saw anything, which is very possible. It's very possible that Dershowitz went down there and it was kind of like a show, like let me show you the island, let me show you that nothing bad happens here. It could be that I'm just putting a story out there. I'm not saying it's true or that I have evidence of it. I'm just saying I can easily see how Dershowitz as an individual might not be guilty of crimes. I don't know if that's necessarily the case, but it's very possible. So, anyways, he wants to get information from this case because he thinks it will show that he's innocent, that there might be an email between somebody that says that Dershowitz didn't participate or we don't have blackmail on him, whatever it could have been anything. So he wants the case.
Speaker 2:So Prescott wrote in her decision that discovery materials designated confidential cannot be disclosed or used outside the confines of the Maxwell action, that the property designated discovery materials may only be disclosed to specific groups or individuals, including attorneys actively working on the Maxwell litigation. Prescott believes that Gufrey's attorneys do not meet that standard, so what that means is they're not going to allow anyone access to this. As a practical matter. The court would be surprised shocked, even if Cooper and Kirk was not in some sense quote using the Maxwell discovery as its representation of Ms Goofrey in her action against Mr Dershowitz. Prescott speculated, even if it was not doing so. Cooper and Kirk is not actively working on the Maxwell matter, such as the disclosure of discovery materials, so it would be permissible under the plain terms of the protective order.
Speaker 2:This is getting complicated, okay, not the first time the courts have covered for Epstein and his collaborators. Maxwell is living in the lap of luxury in Paris right now, which she wasn't. She was actually in the US, believe it or not. She was supposedly spotted in Paris, but somehow she made it back to the US right now without so much as even being questioned by authorities for her alleged role in a child rape network. So it goes through here and basically it says they have to destroy all the evidence. So the evidence that was already collected on Jeffrey Epstein is not going to be used against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Speaker 2:Hold on a second here. All the raids on the townhouses, the island, the New Mexico ranch, his Florida estates, his parents, all of that is going to be destroyed by order of a judge. Do you see how confusing this is for me as a peasant? I mean, we're talking about major sex crimes and a judge is going to stand in the way of trying to get to the bottom of it by ordering things destroyed something that seems outrageous. And so at the same time she's denying one motion while proactively ordering documents destroyed. What this sounds like to me is a coverup. The reason they want the documents destroyed? Why not just put them in a filing cabinet somewhere in some office? I mean, we've got warehouses full of old evidence, just. I mean you can go pull up cold case files from the 1940s and you still have baggies full of evidence. So we're destroying this evidence. This is so, so confusing, so confusing why they're doing this. This happened on Wednesday at 8.30 am. The next day, thursday morning, they go arrest Ghislaine Maxwell.
Speaker 2:Now here's where it gets really complicated with the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The Ghislaine Maxwell case is an old crime. They say it's a precursor to the Jeffrey Epstein saga. They're charging her for crimes from 1994 to 1997. These, which means the testimony that they're using, the sworn testimony that they are using in this case the Department of Justice has been in possession of for almost 24 years. So for 24 years they have sat on this file, this evidence, these victims. For 24 years they've sat on these files and now they're charging her. Jeffrey Epstein was already convicted once and she was named as a co-conspirator. Jeffrey Epstein was arrested again and she was named as a co-conspirator. But because of that judge's actions, all of that stuff is tied up in civil litigation now because the victims want to get compensation, and because of that the judge is saying none of that evidence can now be used in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal trial.
Speaker 2:This is astonishing to me. There's no conspiracies, but there's also no coincidences. How do we get to the point that a judge, the day before they charge Ghislaine Maxwell, eight days after, they fire Berman who wants to go full bore on this case, right? So now Berman wants to go full bore, berman gets fired. Eight days later a judge says all the Epstein, evidence can't be used. And then the next day they go arrest Ghislaine Maxwell on 24-year-old charges, with no sex crimes being named in the indictment. There's a sex act described in the indictment which would count as a sex crime, but they don't charge her for it, man.
Speaker 2:So here's a couple things that we want to pay attention to. Remember the names. Remember the names. Did you notice the press conference that the acting attorney, audrey Strauss, who's took over for Berman, thanked, thanked this? This my, my eyes went wide. I kind of knew that this person was working on this case, but I didn't know that it was going to be this intimate. Did you know? Did you pay? Did um? U S attorney Audrey Strauss thanked career prosecutor prosecutor Maureen Comey.
Speaker 2:Now, one of those names probably sounds familiar to you it's the last name Comey. Who's her dad? Her dad is James Comey. Ah, james Comey, the corrupt FBI director who was part of the coup plot against the president of the United States. The Mr P Dossier himself is her dad, her dad's facing charges of treason and she's prosecuting the Gouffrey case, the Glink, the Maxwell case.
Speaker 2:Oh man guys, now again I got to give the benefit of the doubt. I don't know her. I don't know a lot of details. Maybe she's a patriot, maybe she doesn't like what her dad did. Maybe she's a patriot and she's got a chip on her shoulder and she's going to extract justice no matter the cost. Maybe Probably not, though oh, how inconvenient.
Speaker 2:So James Comey's entire family there's a picture here marching to protest Trump's election over Hillary Clinton. I there's a picture here marching to protest Trump's election over Hillary Clinton. I can't believe that. The FBI director went to a march, a protest march over Trump's election. And guess who's in the picture with him at the anti-Trump march, the resistance march? Maureen Comey. So, if you recall, comey claimed to be a Republican, but he was always a deep state sleeper as an agent protecting sedition of Hillary Clinton. I mean, it's so obvious. He let her off the hook over and over again. I'm looking at a picture here of Maureen Comey. She's in a little group Science, stand for Women, girl Power the Future is Female. Respect Existence or Expect Resistance, girl Power. She's kind of part of the pink hat brigade, if you know what I'm talking about. Okay, next, rod Rosenstein, who's also involved here, covertly protected Bill and Hillary Clinton. Rosenstein was on Ken Starr's legal team Recall. Bill was not guilty and Hillary walked on Whitewater too.
Speaker 2:Our opinion, marine will protect the Clintons again and will attack Trump. And here's I'm looking at a picture here of Ken Starr on the right row. Here's Rod Rosenstein. I mean, this is a cabal. And then you'll recall too, rosenstein wrote the memo that led to the firing of Comey, and Rosenstein also is the one who forced Sessions to recuse himself so promptly, and then he immediately appointed Mueller to the council to investigate Trump for obstruction for firing Comey.
Speaker 2:Marine will continue the legacy of deception and protection. That's what I think is going to. I think that that's what's going to happen here. I think that Marine Comey is going to keep the charges light. She's going to keep sex charges out of it. She's going to. They're going to. They're going to finagle this thing in such a way that they're going to get her in like 10 years in a low max. You know some kind of deal. And that's even reinforced by the fact that you've got this statement here, which is from the attorneys, for this is from Spencer Coven, the attorney for a number of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged victims. So this is one of the people who's trying to come after. The estate of Jeffrey Epstein represents the victims. This is really sad to me. Okay, this, this case is not going to resolve based on what they've gotten the indictment and the people involved here. I mean, we know Prince Andrew's involved, I know Bill Clinton's involved. We've got a whole list of celebrities and people Some of them have already gone down that were involved with Epstein. Check this out.
Speaker 2:Quote as we have consistently said, we are hopeful that the US Attorney's Office would hold all conspirators accountable for their actions in the Epstein conspiracy. So they want all co-conspirators accountable. With the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, this welcome news will hopefully be the first of many co-conspirators I hope so too to face the consequences for his horrific crimes. While the fund Epstein's Victim Compensation Fund was the first page of the last chapter in this sad and terrible saga, the prosecution of Epstein's co-conspirators, including Ms Maxwell, will signal the conclusion of this final chapter. The arrest and successful prosecution of Ms Maxwell and other co-conspirators brings this sad story full circle to a close. We are proud of the FBI and the state's attorney's office for the voracious investigation, and the victims are again hopeful that the justice system will hold these people accountable. We will now wait to see if this holds true.
Speaker 2:This is a misdirect, so first he's got the language in here that this is going to bring things to a close. Guys, if you think that we're like bringing things to a close and there's not an indictment that has the last name Clinton on it, we are not close to closing up this case, we are just closing up a couple of loose ends. That's really what it feels like here. To me it feels like, if we can get Ghislaine Maxwell is featured in that Netflix documentary and that Netflix, this entire case seems to just be what's in the Netflix documentary. And what did I say to you just yesterday about the Netflix documentary? Like 50% of it's true. The other 50% is whitewashed, ignoring blatant evidence and ties.
Speaker 2:It's not a great documentary that documents things that really were going on. It really tries to just isolate Jeffrey Epstein and not make it a bigger thing. Jeffrey Epstein was almost certainly Mossad intelligence. Almost certainly Mossad intelligence. I read through his deposition. When he was arrested the first time and they asked him over and over again, I refused to answer, refused to answer, refused to answer about his ties to intelligence. Why would he refuse to answer? He could have just said no. He refused to answer because the Fifth Amendment would implicate himself.
Speaker 2:So I feel like this is one of those things where it's like they're prepping us, they're neuro-linguistically programming us, to have this be the conclusion that somehow this undercharging of Ghislaine Maxwell will, quote wrap things up. And you know, I mean, there's other things have been, you know, you know, I mean there's other other things have been, uh, you know, wrapped up. So I like it, but it's kind of frustrating. Okay, so the the Southern district of New York has had that Weiner laptop since 2016. None of that evidence is going into this case.
Speaker 2:The guy who had the uh, the guy who had the laptop, weiner is sitting in jail, but none of the criminals that are featured in the laptop Marine, call me is the daughter of James Comey, is the actual prosecutor working this case. They're sitting on 24-year-old evidence, 24-year-old statements that they're including in the indictment, which means what have you been doing for the last 24 years? Bringing this case full circle? Are you kidding me? We're not even scratching the surface of this thing and she's not charged for any sexual crimes, and everything comes out the day after the judge orders the destruction of all the Epstein evidence. There's no conspiracies here, but there's no coincidences. We're being led down a path where we're going to get half of what we want. We're going to get a little bit of justice, but not all of it.
Speaker 2:When I talk about how you see our institutions and how they're failing, this is exactly what I'm talking about. The door's still open for justice here and on tomorrow's episode I want to go into a deep dive on all the things that have happened. I've got. Do you know how many cartels and human trafficking rings and pedophile rings have been rolled up in the last two years? Since Donald Trump took office?
Speaker 2:There has been a concerted worldwide effort to roll up these criminal networks and on one hand, I'm deeply disturbed by this Epstein case. I'm deeply disturbed by Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, her indictment and kind of everything around it. But on the other hand, tomorrow when I go through the podcast but on the other hand, tomorrow when I go through the podcast, you will see and it's very appropriate for Independence Day there are people fighting for our independence. There are people fighting to wrap up the criminal networks. And just to tease for tomorrow, I'll probably play this video tomorrow too. But just to tease you for tomorrow, I want you to hear one of the breaking news reports that also broke yesterday while this Epstein case was going down.
Speaker 2:I want you to hear this other event that happened over in Europe and this is really significant because it happens on the same day that Gufri Maxwell is arrested and listen to the things they're talking about. I'm going to get into it in a lot more detail tomorrow on independence day, but but just listen to this. Okay, so the B, the camera footage on this, the B roll as they call it, is a lot of. This is a SWAT team breaking into a house. So you'll hear some of this background noise as they roll the B roll, but but anyways, they're breaking into houses. You see them. You know it's typical SWAT team type stuff breaking in hey, hands down, that kind of stuff.
Speaker 7:So just just so you know, the background noise is just mostly police officers arresting people thought they were untouchable until the police hacked their ultra secret phones used to organize the gun and drug deals. This raid in Magala, merseyside, is one of 93 arrests so far in the northwest, with firearms, grenades and hundreds of rounds of ammunition seized and over three and a half million pounds in cash. This was a joint operation by police, regional crime squads and international teams, with French investigators shutting down the phone server today. So we are basically one army fighting serious organized crime and for the public. You know the public out there, particularly in the northwest, they need to know that we are working together, you know, to try and achieve to protect them. The National Crime Agency has described this infiltration as like having someone on the inside listening in to the Mr Biggs. Those were the flashy cars and flashy houses organizing executions and turf wars, and the police were seeing it all, the Mr Biggs.
Speaker 2:So the Mr Biggs would be the Epsteins, the Clintons, even low-level drug dealers like El Chapo, things like that. Notice how I said low-level drug dealers like El Chapo. That's right, el Chapo was just a district manager for the drug trade. The real drug traders are sitting in seats of power, like the president of Venezuela and Honduras and things like that. So anyways, but nonetheless, wow, that's pretty cool. Okay, it keeps going.
Speaker 7:These £3,000 phones have been used for years in the execution of Salford's Mr Big, paul Massey, and gangland fixer John Kinsella from Liverpool. They were programmed to wipe any incriminating material at the touch of a button called the Kill Pill. Police say more than 200 murder plots have now been thwarted.
Speaker 6:There's a business empire and an illegal business empire that deals in the misery in our communities and the sheer wealth that these people get. These people sit behind gated communities in nice houses while the burglars, the robberies that take place. They are corrosive to our societies.
Speaker 7:This man was arrested on suspicion of importing firearms. Police say this is just the start and the now not-so-secret messages will be used in evidence. Elaine Wilcox, itv News Liverpool.
Speaker 2:If you knew the scale of what they were listening in on. If you knew the scale of what they were listening in on. If you knew the scale of what they were listening in on which I will get into tomorrow. So I'm teasing hard for tomorrow's episode if you knew the scale of what they were listening on, you might get kind of excited. I'm going to dig into that network tomorrow. That network has been listened to since about 2014. Canada Canada was the one who cracked the encryption and they've been gathering evidence since 2014. But until the election of Donald Trump they couldn't do anything with it. And tomorrow I'm going to go down through the timeline of events the cartels, the criminal networks, the child trafficking rings that have been taken down and almost nothing has been in the news Almost nothing. When I go through the cartels and the networks that have been taken down and almost nothing has been in the news Almost nothing. When I go through the cartels and the networks that have been taken down and how they were taken down, I hope that you have a lot of excitement about what the future can hold for the world, not just for America, but for the world. Could you imagine a world where the big criminal cartels are all gone. We're heading there. We're heading there. And, just as an example of this, remember when Trump got elected? Ms-13? It's all over the country, right, all over the country. When was the last time you heard about MS-13? Yeah, they were one of the first ones wrapped up in this with this surveillance network.
Speaker 2:Okay, tomorrow I look forward to seeing you guys. Please share the show. I feel like these shows are good. I like them, I enjoy doing them and the more listeners, the merrier. I'd love to do live shows someday. I'd put together a really good peasants presentation and travel and do these shows. So if you think you've got a venue or you think you've got an audience that might want to listen to me, even if it's a smaller audience, I'm definitely interested in coming out and doing a presentation. I'd like to do something like that. So reach out to me if you're interested in maybe helping organize that or helping do something like that, and we can go over some of the details. You can find me on Twitter at PeasantsPod. You can find me on Parler at PeasantsPod as well. You can also find me on Facebook at the Peasants Perspective, and you can email me at peasantspod at gmailcom. Thanks for joining me and I look forward to seeing you tomorrow.
Speaker 1:Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would, please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then, who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Speaker 1:We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. All the waves he think he is, what raves he think he is.
Speaker 1:I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how do you become king then? The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 1:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? You saw it, didn't you?
