Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
When Those in Power Play Dirty: Exposing Political Corruption and Cover-ups
The battle between everyday citizens and the elite power structure takes center stage in this eye-opening episode of The Peasants' Perspective. We dive deep into how regular people—the "peasants"—continually shoulder the heaviest burdens while those in power manipulate systems to maintain control.
A highlight of our discussion is the historic Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal brokered by Trump, establishing a crucial 20-mile corridor that reconnects ancient trade routes while shifting power away from Russia and Iran. This diplomatic achievement demonstrates how strategic negotiation can transform seemingly intractable conflicts into opportunities for prosperity. Meanwhile, we examine how Trump closed the southern border without new legislation, reducing "catch and release" numbers from over 180,000 to just 20 per month—an astonishing 99.99% decrease that challenges long-standing narratives about immigration enforcement.
Perhaps most disturbing are the newly revealed FBI documents showing how investigations into the Clinton Foundation were systematically shut down by high-ranking officials. When Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates explicitly ordered prosecutors to "shut it down," it revealed the depth of corruption protecting political elites. We connect these cover-ups to the broader "Russia hoax" conspiracy, highlighting figures like Admiral Mike Rogers who refused to compromise their integrity despite immense pressure.
Throughout our conversation, we return to a fundamental truth: the system is designed to keep everyday people struggling while protecting those in power. But there's hope in awareness and collective action. When small voices speak truth and expose corruption, we chip away at the foundations of elite control. Whether you're frustrated by economic inequality, political manipulation, or institutional corruption, this episode offers both validation and empowerment.
Ready to see beyond the illusions? Join our growing community of clear-eyed "peasants" who refuse to accept the status quo. Subscribe now and become part of the conversation that's awakening America to the realities of power and the possibility of change.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
I don't like it. We gotta do a campaign.
Speaker 4:And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth Bunchik had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb we're getting screwed, man.
Speaker 1:Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, Every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people.
Speaker 1:Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Perspective. Sorry, and like every day, I'm still opening up the chats. So thank you very much for joining us. It was a great day, you know, yesterday or I should say not yesterday this morning, as I was driving in, I was like man, you know, I feel like every day sometimes. Unfortunately, we just kind of cover a similar, similar topics.
Speaker 8:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And uh, and then I had this little voice inside my head was like, don't worry about it, People come to you to hear about those topics because they want to ignore them the rest of the day. And I was like actually, that is the feedback I get, get. It was like one of the one of our show listeners that oftentimes reach out to me. I was like that's exactly what they would say. Like you know what. We're gonna keep at it because that's exactly the point of this.
Speaker 7:This is news commentary and this is news and you know sometimes what we do is a little bit like the truman show, but you know, sometimes people need daily reassurance that everything's going to be okay.
Speaker 1:Yeah, yeah, basically weed and boys on on youtube. Welcome, welcome every morning it's always good to see you in there. Our show is growing. It's kind of fun. It's really fun watching. Just slowly but surely it's picking up watching. The hours watched increase. I mean we're I don't know 27 000 views or something. At this point I have no idea. It's pretty awesome, pretty awesome. Oh, look, here we go, jonah takis, it's a good, warm morning. Yes, we are in the throes of summer, aren't we?
Speaker 7:supposed to get cooler today where we're at, and tomorrow is supposed to rain all day. I'll take it.
Speaker 1:I'm excited to live here in the rain, so moved here in 2013. Weather never bothered me. Never bothered me because, you know, I'm in and out of an office Just driving the rain oh it's nice. And I have a metal roof at night oh, it sounds so cool. Listen to this. You know we live in the. We live in the northwest. And then I started working outside. Aha, I was waiting for that. And then it was like this freaking rain will not stop.
Speaker 1:I worked what felt like a decade with a wet sweater on you know, because you just wear a high vis hoodie out on a job site and you're wet all the time. I just got used to being completely muggy, wet inside my sweater. I'd work, I'd shovel, I'd rake. Sometimes people would come up to me, aren't you like I'd just be beating sweat and I'm wearing a sweater and they're like what's going on? I take the sweater off, I get too cold, yeah, and I'm already wet anyways. It's bristling, and then, of course, when it really rains, it slows down the job site.
Speaker 1:So I started to kind of like detest the weather up here yeah but this summer, even like through the hot days, I I'm like well, I'm mostly inside, and it's been nicer.
Speaker 7:And then if you're a laborer some days you're putting on that wet vest in the morning. Ooh, ooh.
Speaker 1:You know what I'm talking about. My big thing lately has been socks. Right, I wore uh, I wore. Socks are very important. I wore merino wool socks thick work socks every day for years, to where we have dozens and dozens of pairs. I hate them. I don't like the way they feel on my feet, but you need warm feet, and so merino wool is the way to go for a work boot.
Speaker 7:Well, you don't want to get trench foot either.
Speaker 1:Don't want to get trench foot, yeah, and if you wear cotton socks they just get destroyed, yep. So I've been wearing wool socks and uh, now I don't need to wear wool socks and I'm like I just want to wear nice soft cotton socks. The other thing too in prison the socks were horrible. They had a. I haven't worn a pair of socks with a with a seam in them in the front of the show since I was eight.
Speaker 1:Right, that's what they got. Oh my god, they were horrible. They caused blisters on your toes. They were horrid.
Speaker 7:They had no heel, of course, right they're just a tube sock well, the only good story about those is they got two heels.
Speaker 1:Oh my yeah, it's kind of like flipping your underwear inside out after enough time they do wear in a certain direction. Yeah, that was the most annoying thing was wearing crappy socks. And then, when I was in dc, the shoes we had you know, they give you flats, they give you, like these little slip-on flats, but you can buy off, commissary, a pair of tennis shoes. Well, in dc they were russell brand, everything was russell brand, and these shoes were horrible. They were horrible shoes, in fact. They made my feet numb.
Speaker 1:I walked a lot in prison. Like that's how I took up my time. I'd walk the block, I'd walk back and forth on the top tier, just, and then when I got to Philadelphia, you'd walk in circles. I got to Missouri, I'd walk the track and in both Philadelphia and in DC I had crappy shoes and it made my feet numb. I couldn't feel my toes, like I actually got numb feet. And talk to a guy who ran marathons and he's like, oh, that's pretty normal, it has to do with the shoes and blood flow. And he's like, yeah, you got to get better shoes. And I'm like, yeah, because I have a lot of options in here. Anyways, they were bad. The American conservative ran a piece yesterday that is a really good piece. It's called Peace After Conquest the Armenia.
Speaker 1:Azerbaijan, peace as unpalatable lessons for everyone. Unpalatable lessons for everyone. So here it says that Armenia I can say that word Azerbaijan peace summit can be claimed to be the most significant achievement of President Donald Trump's second term foreign policy. As his administration, I got to do some some talking this morning. As his administration, I got to do some some talking this morning. Warm me up, as his administration constantly reminds us, trump, a man chasing an ever elusive Nobel Peace Prize, is the peace president, so much so that he is seeking peace in badlands of Eastern Europe, western Asia, where three Huntingtonian civilization blocks, western Islamic and Orthodox clash, in the chronically bloody Middle East. The admin also reminds us that he has settled wars between Thailand and Cambodia True, indian Pakistan debatable and a variety of African ethnic groups Partially true, but there is no denying this. This one is different. Armenia and Azerbaijan were locked in what seemed to be an intractable conflict, but those countries' respective heads of state sat with Trump grinning and signing a paper that made the US a quasi guarantor of amnesty in the region, albeit with a heavy dose of American corporate involvement, at a junction in the historic trade route that might once again alter the balance of power in that theater.
Speaker 1:I have a degree in political science. I have a minor in international studies and military science. My international studies minor took me all over the world studying how different governments work and specifically how power shifts. Because you've got an underlying power structure of, say, a religion Islam and then you have independent power structures of nations that are guarding certain resources and populations and they are either protecting certain minority groups or they are persecuting them. But you have this connected Islam or you have Christianity, connects all of Europe and America, right. So understand that's called the cathedral, so understand that that those ideas, those values of religion carry through space and time. And then nations are designed to protect resources, borders, et cetera, et cetera. You know so it's like this tiered structure.
Speaker 1:So when you look at conflicts in these regions, a lot of times it's where you have the clashes of two underlying cathedrals. When you have Christian, orthodox and you have Islamic religions under the same nation trying to share the same resources, they don't share the same base programming, they don't share all the same value systems. Sure, at its deepest core, everything's got a lot of similarities. That's why these religions span through space and time is they hold truths, things like karma, what you sow you reap, et cetera, et cetera. But they don't always hold things like value of life or human rights, or consciousness or anything like that. The American brokered, uh, broke the American brokered. And so the reason I say that is, when I read something like this, I'm like this is monumental. This could change the course of world history. Right, cause it's these little hotspots that'll sit and germinate for a hundred years, and then all of a sudden boom, world War II breaks out and the Jews are the victims.
Speaker 7:Do you have any historical context that you can give us, like do you know what these two countries have been about? Let's read it, okay, yep.
Speaker 1:The American Brokered Guaranteed Peace hands over a 20-mile corridor to be developed by the US-Trump route for international peace and prosperity. That's what they're calling it, otherwise known as Azerbaijan as the Zangzir Corridor and in Armenia as the Sunuk Road links Azerbaijan with Turkey through Armenia. It will be operated obstinately by an American company, thus guaranteeing peace and profit and profit. The route will start a historically route, will restart a route historically used by american merchants connecting turkey and, by virtue, europe, with asia, without having to cross through either iran or russia. The idea is that once this route is established, it will allow turkey to reopen its border with armenia, closed since 1993 armenianAzer conflict. Turkey's President, recep Tayyip Erdogan, was instrumental in convincing Trump to make this deal, as well as helping the American and Azerbaijani sides together. Both Moscow and Tehran are circumspect about the project, but powerless to do anything about it. They do, however, read the writing on the wall. This deal, while bestowing profit to America, also strengthens Turkish regional preponderance over the historic rivals of russia and persia. One of the first references to armenian commerce connecting asia and europe through this route was found in marco polo's 13th century chronicles. Venetian merchants like polo were trying to trying out new trade routes and partners connecting india to italy, seeking asian wealth, silk, ivory, jewels, rugs and spices. The route only gained even more importance after mehmed conquered constantinople, establishing turkish supremacy around the bosporus and making the ottomans guaranteed tours of order by both land and sea. The ottomans in turn settled many armenians from eastern turkey and crimenia in istanbul. Armenian migration and trade continued to gain momentum as the ottomans mellowed and became more and more for lack of a better word multicultural throughout the 16th century. So this is like an ancient area and this conflict is really ancient too. Right, there's been a lot of population movement, armenians brought into Istanbul and all this kind of stuff. It's created a lot of tension.
Speaker 1:The pressure of imperialism naturally liberalized trade routes and encouraged more cultural dilution. And there was another geopolitical angle the Ottomans had to be good to the traders to demonstrate that they were better than the Safid Persian and Russian empires, both of which were rivals to Ottoman power. One of the earliest examples of borderless trade. This network connected Surat, madras, calcutta, constantinople, izmir, moscow, krasnov, live, venice and amsterdam. All all over it were significant armenian and turkish diasporas and a cultural imprints. The total volume of goods circulated through this network was immense and it was eclipsed only by the eventual rise of the british imperial sea sea routes through aden and suez.
Speaker 1:The current dynamic echoes the past, with a rapid shift of balance of power, with the caucuses towards towards turkey and the west, as opposed to any russian or ironic iranian-led bloc. As russia got busy with ukraine, azerbaijan, decisively routed armenia with turkish backing and reconquered the disputed nagorno-kabur region between 2020 and 2023 oh man, if there's any native speakers of these languages they're like. Well, turkish drones changed the battlescape in Armenia and Syria and bogged down Russia and Ukraine. More importantly, armenia realized that there's no Russian Iranian Calvary coming to save them, and so they effectively discarded its deep rooted alliance with Russia and rivalry with Turkey. So you know Russia being that, trump being that Russian agent, and all you know russia being that trump, being that russian agent and all you know, here you're taking old nations away from the sphere of influence of russia.
Speaker 1:The discipline of international relations is all about power again power in the synonym for politics, where neither ethnicity nor religion are so important. This new hegemonic peace will have unpalatable lessons for all sides and prompt a revaluation within liberal history and academy. As every generation before us is known, conquest is at times a more stable guarantor of hegemonic peace and continuous future and continuous and futile war to reimpose a broken balance. Small powers without a great power backing will do better to accommodate a regional balance than to rebel against an impending order. Sometimes hard power brings about a greater imperial equilibrium for all the actors involved, often overtaking divisive forces and ideology, religious and ethnic kinships. It is a big deal, man. It is a big deal he took. He shifted the balance of power away from persia and russia.
Speaker 1:As far as trade is concerned, because that's been one of the big problems in that region is those two. You know Russia's sanctioned death, iran sanctioned death, but they hold the territory, they've got the trade route and so you're stuck using sea, suez canal. You know there's a lot of bad dudes in the neighborhood, so establishing this corridor which basically allows them to completely bypass Iran and Russia on their way to the east, through countries that have signed on to the abraham peace accords and stuff like that. What a big deal here. The other thing, too, is turkey has been on the balance of deciding to go with russia. They're in nato, right, they're connected to mainland europe, but they're the bridge to asia, so, and there is there islamic, unlike, I think, every other nato country, and so they've always had this weird tension. Because you know NATO is against the war on terror, but you know Turkey's kind of like halfway in the war on terror. You know they've got different ethnic groups that are Turkish, that are also spread out, like there's Kurds in Turkey, there's Kurds in Syria, there's Kurds in Iraq. You know there's some crossover, there's huge crossover, and Turkey hasn't been the most willing partner to have us playing hopscotch over there to get over to bomb other Islamic countries. They've kind of done it out of necessity, because of treaty and because it would be almost impossible for them to pull out of NATO. But at the same time they've been kind of sticking the mud with NATO too, and in fact Turkey was the first one that said that Ukraine was a no go when it came to NATO, which possibly averted nuclear war with Russia because they're like, ok, at least if Turkey says no. You know what I mean. So this is like a really big deal.
Speaker 1:The other thing, too is keep in mind other things have happened. I think it was, was it Norway or Finland, sweden, I can't remember. One of the Nordic countries joined NATO officially in the last year or two, which was another big deal, because if you go through history, russia fought wars with Finland and Sweden when they were one kingdom. They kind of have a frontier that that touches each other. Yeah, so really big deal. The shift of the balance of power. The other thing, too that donald trump's been able to do is not only is he creating peace around the world and becoming known as the president of peace, including this significant one with armenia and azerbaijan, but he also closed the southern border without new legislation which how long were? We told that you needed to revamp all the legislation and do it, and the tools just aren't there. Well, that's not really the case. This is carolyn levitt talking about the success of the border. Oh, hold on, that was a great transition too I'll just say liars be lying there.
Speaker 7:We go here about the border, you know.
Speaker 15:Oh my goodness, it's so bad all right back to carolyn at border, president Trump continues to deliver on his promise to make America safe again, and new reporting from the Washington Times fully highlights the difference in Joe Biden's disgraceful approach to the border compared to President Trump's. Under Trump, border catch and release has dropped ninety nine point ninety nine percent from worst Biden month. You can't get much better than that. This statistic in particular is astounding. Border Patrol agents caught and immediately released one hundred and eighty nine thousand six hundred and four illegal aliens into the United States in December 2023, at the height of the Biden border crisis. But under President Trump, border Patrol agents caught and released only 20 illegal aliens into the US in the month of February. At the border, president Trump continues to deliver on 20.
Speaker 1:He let 20 of those illegal immigrants into the country. I can't believe that Wow. Catch and release 180,000 down to 20. That's a closed border. I think we could probably handle 20 immigrants a month.
Speaker 7:I don't know why we had to let 20 in. Yeah, that's right now. What the heck if you got numbers that low, it seems like it's pretty easy just to say no, thanks, yeah breaking promises every day.
Speaker 1:20 wow, that's really impressive. Uh, I am. I am of all the things that I've been impressed with, aside from pardoning the j6ers, thank you right. Aside from pardoning all the j6ers, I am amazed at how much he's locked down that border.
Speaker 7:I'm not surprised I'm not surprised. I'm not either, because a lot of it is just perception. You know, people are going to not try if they don't think they're going to make it and this really goes far to talk about you know, just do your job.
Speaker 1:Imagine being a border patrol agent, catching someone and being like okay, you're released and you know, you know they're cartel, you know they're they're, you know just did.
Speaker 7:a lot of these border agents have been there for, you know, multiple administrations They've had to deal with, whatever the policy was.
Speaker 1:Try, try to tell them that the president doesn't matter. Right the voting doesn't matter.
Speaker 7:Oh my gosh, you want to get a hot take? Just go ask a couple of those guys.
Speaker 1:Yeah, seriously, if I was differently inclined, I'd seriously consider joining DHS right now. It looks like a fun job. Dress up and battle out or walk around on domestic streets Tackle people. It's awesome, make a difference. Meanwhile, trump's now trying his hand at local law enforcement. He's taking over DC.
Speaker 7:They had like 20s on arrest and 40s on arrest, which is quite a bit for a 10 square mile area and I like how it's like. Well, this is just a test. We're getting ready to come out to your neighborhood and all these you know blue, blue areas are like not on our watch. You stay out of our city.
Speaker 1:What's funny is TikTok is full of old timers in DC, like old black men in their 50s and 60s. You kids stay off the streets. I get out of DC. Now is not the time to be gangbanging.
Speaker 1:It's the kids, man. It's the kids. You got to keep them away from jacking cars. It's so funny because I've watched like four or five of these like just tick tock videos of guys in DC being like, oh, these guys are rolling up in here. This is the fifth time today a cop car is driven by my shop. You know it's like it's awesome.
Speaker 7:This morning I had an old grandma that gave me some words of inspiration in my meme role. She's all hey, I don't know who needs to hear this, but you know there's crackheads out there that are broke they to hear this?
Speaker 1:but you know there's crackheads out there that are broke, that are still getting high. So get out there, get after it. Yeah, I had that I. I sent a meme. This is probably really similar to the one that we're talking about. I sent a meme to our friend earl. Oh, he sent me a small letter last night. Holy smokes, things huge. I have to go read that after the show, okay. So I sent me a small letter last night Holy smokes, things huge. I have to go read that after the show, okay. So I sent him a meme the other day that said uh, I'm pretty sure it's the same way you're talking about it. Where is it? It was so funny. I said do crackheads say I don't get high to tape because I'm broke? No, they make it happen. Don't let a track crackhead try harder than you today. That's right. I sent that to earl because he's literally living on the streets like he spent the night in a shelter last night next to a crackhead getting his license today and then we can put him on a bus.
Speaker 1:Yeah, so, uh forager on rumble says as a scout, we looked at the trees to see, to see moss, to see moss growth, to determine north where you are at. Moss grows on all sides of the that's right that's true that is very true, pray the rosary. Good morning everyone. Yes, good morning, pray the rosary.
Speaker 7:Thank you for joining us today depending on where you are, you can get tricked too, because some of the trees like in ellensburg, you know they're they're wind ripped.
Speaker 1:Oh yeah, the north might be the wrong direction yes, it's pretty, yeah you're, you get into the, you get into the olympics for sure. And it's like no, it's moss 360 yeah, yeah, that's sometimes pierce that.
Speaker 1:Yeah, that is so crazy. We have a rainforest here, yeah, like it rains a lot in seattle, but it actually technically rains more in new york because it rains harder. So you know, that was one thing that blew me away, ron. What is a lot of inches of rain for us to get in a day Like? What is it? It's rained all day and what is like the normal accumulation?
Speaker 7:Well, I know a thing about this. That's really not the right answer, or not the right question to ask, because it varies so greatly across the state depending on where you live. So, and you know this because- you go to swim with no rain yeah
Speaker 7:right in swim. They get about 12 inches a year. Yeah, so you know, if you get a half inch storm up there, that would be a tremendous storm a half inch what about here? Where we're at well down in port orchard, which is only, you know, 40, 50 miles away, they get 65 inches a year, so it's like triple what you get in squim and a good size rainfall in that area would be about an inch okay and then in forks they get 140, some inches a year.
Speaker 7:That's 12 feet of rain, so a storm out there could be inches.
Speaker 1:So the reason I asked this? Because when I got to missouri we have these rainstorms right, we had hurricane warning, not hurricane tornado warnings all the time and it would rain so hard. I was like I've not seen rain this hard since brazil.
Speaker 7:The tropical rain. So, and then intensity is a totally different topic.
Speaker 1:It would rain for an hour. It'd be two inches Right In an hour. It was like it was crazy and I'm sure we've got lots of listeners here. Well, that's normal where I live. Listen up here. It rains all day. An inch is a lot of rain. It's like normal where I live. Listen up here. It rains all day. An inch is a lot of rain. Yeah, it's like holy cow. It rained all day long and it rained hard and it rained an inch.
Speaker 1:Then you get to missouri and, oh, it rained for an hour and it rained four inches I'd watch the gutters because you know we're in a building gutters totally just flowing over the downspouts, blowing back up, not going underground at all, you know just, and it was just flooded. And then it'd get sunny and you'd see the the water bake off and you'd start sweating because the humidity and it was like, wow, that was crazy and I kept thinking like it's, it's sunny every day here, except for two hours when it rains. I know florida's like that and that's how brazil was. Brazil was like that, like you know, you'd get that afternoon rain and you'd get an inch or two in an hour and then it'd be sunny again. So in dc, trump's taking his crack, just like he did at the border, cleaning up the border. He's taking a crack at, uh, running the city and getting rid of the crime. So his approach is go hard, go fast. He's got like 800 extra agents walking around all the different fbi, marshals park department.
Speaker 1:They're all deployed right now saturation unison yes, so there was a press conference yesterday with the chief of police, who's just? Uh, she's the I think she's the metropolitan chief of police, or whatever. She just relieved the other guy and now she's in on the job and she got asked a question about the chain of command and I thought this was a really interesting answer for somebody in law enforcement. What does the chain of command is now? What does that mean? Okay, if you didn't catch that one more time, you ready. What does the chain of command is now? What does that mean? Well, is it Cam Bondi, speaking for the mayor? Oh, and now the city councilwoman.
Speaker 11:So the executive order is clear. Um the president has requested mpd services and our home rule charter. Um outlines the process. Um the president designated attorney general bondy uh as his proxy uh to to request services through me okay that was pretty funny chain of command.
Speaker 7:What are you talking about so?
Speaker 1:who's the chain of command? Now, like, who do you answer to what's that? You know why. You do it to yourselves like I, I, I want to believe you know what the chain command is. Right, you probably follow it like you know who your boss is, you know who your lieutenants are, but the fact that you don't even know the phrase chain of command is kind of startling. Yeah, like it kind of screams out dei higher yeah, a little bit yeah, pray.
Speaker 1:The rosary says please send the rain down here to san diego. Well, we wouldn't want to do that, because then san diego wouldn't be beautiful, sunny san diego and, based on how you guys handle forest fires, I don't think your city is set up for flash flooding you probably look like the grand canyon, yeah I don't know. I don't know that you guys should get rain, because politically I don't know if you guys can handle it well, uh, I didn't mention.
Speaker 7:You know, the intensity is a different topic for area and I'm sorry to bring this back up, but three and a half inches per hour is maximum intensity that you can expect around here, so you really want a good storm. Three and a half inches, that's pretty intense in an hour.
Speaker 1:Yeah, and that would be really intense. Oh yeah, uh, the thing about here is is we're waterlogged yes so the ground can absorb quite a bit at, you know, an inch a day like it does. It's just pretty good. But the water table in a lot of places is only like 12 inches deep or less, like it's pretty shallow about three feet on my property. Yeah, so if you get, if you get a really heavy rain like that, like you can get saturated- pretty saturated, yeah, and it doesn't have anywhere to go.
Speaker 1:So just the news ran a piece yesterday that he teased out. The headline is shut, shut it down. Bombshell FBI timeline exposes political interference in the Clinton corruption prose probe. So this shouldn't really surprise anybody. That's, you know, not been hiding under a rock for the last decade. But essentially the FBI was continuously shutting down any investigations into the Hillary Clinton matter or the Clinton Foundation, and one of them is Sally Yates. Do you remember who Sally Yates is? Sally yates? Do you remember who sally yates?
Speaker 7:is dude.
Speaker 1:I don't remember the details, but I do remember the name sally yates sat in on the meeting with biden, obama, brennan, clapper okay, uh and mccabe and I think comey was there and they were discussing general flynn and they were like we got to get General Flynn. She was in on that meeting. After when Trump came into office, she became the interim acting director attorney general while they were getting ready to put Jeff Sessions in, and Trump did the Muslim ban, as they called it, which was the immigration ban for countries that don't do background checking and vetting Muslims. Venezuela was also included on that list, but it got labeled the Muslim ban. She refused to enforce it, so she had to get fired.
Speaker 1:Of course, people gave her all these accolades. I'm so proud of you for denying the president, not following the chain of command and, you know, for not doing your job, which you're supposed to do. Blah, blah, blah. So Sally Yates apparently was one of the people that was shutting down things. Sally Yates said shut it down.
Speaker 1:Then deputy attorney general Sally Yates is quote is demanding the derailed timeline of political impediments that agents in New York and little rock, Arkansas and Washington DC reported. She literally wrote in an email shut it down. The agents tried to get help of federal prosecutors to determine whether or what crimes occurred while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, notably because at the time, her family foundation solicited hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign and US interests with business before her department, Andrew McCabe, got involved, saying things like this the declassified timeline revealed the Justice Department indicated they would not be supportive of an FBI investigation. End quote. The timeline also shows in mid-February 2016,. Mccabe ordered that quote no overt investigation steps were allowed to be taken in the Clinton Foundation investigation. Quote without quote, without his approval, a command he allegedly repeated numerous times over the coming months. Wow.
Speaker 7:Wow yeah.
Speaker 1:Timeline detailed how Sally Yates ordered one of the federal prosecutors to shut it down in the March of 2016 timeframe.
Speaker 1:Aliates ordered one of the federal prosecutors to shut it down in the March of 2016 timeframe. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York and the Eastern District of New York reportedly said in August 2016 that they would not support the investigation the Clinton Foundation, according to the timeline and that no explanation was given. They went around to say they were, they had questions concerning regarding the statute of limitations around the investigations, with one still unnamed official saying they wanted to close the chapter and move on. Uh, he goes on to say. He goes on to talk about the clinton foundation allegations, which had been the focus by the book clinton cash by peter switzer. Uh, an unnamed investigator may have had one or two brief discussions in the fall of 2015 with an assistant use attorney in the nation's capital, with a member of DOJ's public integrity section, according to the timeline, where Clinton Foundation was quote likely ancillary and with the intention of informing the redacted DOJ officials that an investigator was continuing to study the matter and possibly predicate an investigation. So they just kept shutting it down.
Speaker 1:Like they kept popping up Arkansas, d DC, new York, everywhere they were at it kept popping up and they just kept shutting it down. Paula Batty, then assistant director in charge of the Washington field office, described McCabe of his negative and annoyed and angry about the Clinton Foundation cases, with McCabe saying that they, the DOJ, say there's nothing there and with the McCabe asking why are we even doing this?
Speaker 7:She's just like gatekeeper.
Speaker 1:Dude. Mccabe's wife was running for office in Virginia and the Clintons were donating to her. Mccabe's drove a Porsche to work and people made comment of like how can you afford this Porsche? You know we make good money, but just barely good enough to live in the area, not to live it good and have a Porsche.
Speaker 7:Yeah, fbi agents are not really rich people yeah.
Speaker 1:Anyways. So this article is just full of these quotes like that, you know. Shut it down, stop doing. It was advised, no investigation action was to take place unless McCabe authorized it. Just over and over and over again, they kept doing this.
Speaker 1:Yeah, yeah, and a gatekeeper gatekeeper and you know these are very powerful people. Like a guy like andrew mccabe most people don't know who he is. He's he's calling the shots, he's the one that's enabling the clintons to pay for play and all this stuff. And then it just cascades right. It becomes a cover-up, it becomes uh, it just becomes something that none of us are comfortable with. Left or right, there has to be accountability, there has to be, otherwise this will continue, and the reality is this has been going on.
Speaker 7:The more you look at this, the more you realize that without accountability, this will continue. Yeah. And I mean it'll just ping pong, ping pong back and forth.
Speaker 1:Yep One dirty trick after another and interesting news. Laura Loomer had her defamation deposition in the Bill Maher defamation deposition, oh, in the bill mayor uh defamation case. Do you know what this is all about? Not really so bill mayor accused laura loomer of sleeping with donald trump and so laura loomer sued bill mayor.
Speaker 1:Yeah, he's like well he's not sleeping with milani, probably sleeping with laura loomer. So bill mayor, uh. So laura loomer sued bill mayor. Well, she had her depositionosition and she's the self-appointed loyalty enforcer. Well, her deposition was a little off the rails in a particularly wild exchange.
Speaker 1:Loomer, practically roast, practically roasted Representative Margie, margie Taylor Green. As someone who puts roast beef in her pants, what are the basis for you saying she puts, for saying she puts Arby's in her pants? Mayor's legal counselor asked she carries roast beef in her pants. What are the basis for you saying she puts, uh, for saying she puts Arby's in her pants? Mayor's legal counselor asked she carries roast beef in her pockets? Loomer responded what is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants? The council pressed because I know she likes to eat at Arby's. Loomer said for the clarifying that she believes green puts the meat sandwiches in her pants and she believed Green would agree with that statement. Are you making a derogatory comment about her sex life by talking about Arby's in her pants? The council asked no, I'm talking about Arby's, the sandwiches, I'm talking about Arby's. I would. I'm very direct person. Loomer said If I was making a derogatory comment I would have said it.
Speaker 7:Hold on. Is this our ad campaign that we're reading?
Speaker 1:No, is this an arby's commercial? Her definition. Immediately after the arby's exchange, loomer offered another gym without provocation. She believes senator lindsey graham is gay, told me in confidence that lindsey graham is gay. Loomer said hold on, miss loomer, there's no question, responded mayor's attorney. Loomer sued mayor at hbo in october for the late night. Host suggested loomer might be effing Donald Trump and the far right activist had since claimed that Mayor's joke tanked her odds at landing a White House gig. It probably did.
Speaker 7:Sounds like a really good write up for an SNL skit.
Speaker 1:She puts in her pants Are you talking about?
Speaker 7:are you talking about some?
Speaker 1:innuendo no.
Speaker 18:I'm talking about armies.
Speaker 1:Totally off the rails, man, I'd be be like I'm not here to testify the whole time. Tiffany and carlito. Good morning, sapphire patriot. There's supposed to be a big document drop today on more killery, documented documents and corruption. I believe I just read it. Yeah, there might be more, but I think that was what it was. Morning. Peasants says sapphire patriot, and are you? Is that what you are going over now? Yeah, that was that's exactly what I was going over. We got an early morning show, so we can sometimes beat everyone else to the punch.
Speaker 1:So this is John Solomon and he's reflecting back and the story is way back in 2016,. Might have been 2017. John Solomon goes out to his mailbox and there's two men in suits waiting for him. They're two FBI agents, presumably, and they're like listen, we have a tip for you. There's a dirty trick going on. We have awesome powers here at the go in the government and those powers are being used to play a political dirty trick on the American people, and that is what started John Solomon's reporting on Russiagate and slowly starting to unravel on that. They pointed him in the right direction. Whoever those two agents are, which John Solomon, to my knowledge, has never disclosed and likely never will, are one of a handful of people who saved America. If America is to be saved, you'll be able to credit those two people. You'll be able to credit people like Patrick Byrne. There's a couple dozen people that, literally, behind the scenes, saved America.
Speaker 7:Yeah, we call them the greatest American heroes.
Speaker 1:Yes, and we'll probably never know their names, right, it's kind of like Washington spies. You know, the reason we won the Revolutionary War had a lot to do with the spy network washington set up, and we still don't know who those people are but we'll still be forever grateful.
Speaker 13:We will be forever grateful yep yeah, it has been a whirlwind of a couple weeks. You know the guys were wondering john, just to start. No, yeah, start here you. You once told us the story about guys showing up at your house with information or asking you about, I mean with, what's been going on, I mean anything like that happening now.
Speaker 5:I mean this is crazy no, but I gotta say, those two guys who just showed up at my house at 11 o'clock at night after I got off the entity one night, uh, what they told me has been so preciously true, perhaps worse than I understood.
Speaker 5:Even a few years ago, when I was first credited with sort of unraveling parts of the russia collusion case, they kept saying to me the intelligence community and fbi were used to carry out a dirty trip against the american people using the most awesome counter-terrorism, counter-intelligence tools that they had been given. In other words, we weaponized, uh, the like, we weaponized our counter-terrorism and counter-intelligence tools to run a psychological operation on the American public to deceive them into believing that the man they had elected as president was actually a Russian student for Vladimir Putin. And when I look at it now, it is far more extensive, far more complete, far more involving of so many different people. You know we've gotten House members and senators and leakers and consultants, and it was a mass conspiracy to undo the will of the American people for the 26th election and to fool them into thinking the man they had just elected was a was a russian asset and um, it is.
Speaker 5:Perhaps you know, I think, back now at watergate and the moment we learned, that moment that the public learned, in the moment that republicans learned that richard nixon even remotely considered asking the cia to interfere with the f? Fbi in the investigation of Watergate man, the world turned on Richard Nixon. Here the CIA and the FBI are running the operation. They are literally turning themselves against the very citizens that they've been entrusted to protect and they're trying to deceive them. And I can't think of a more perilous operation to the underpinnings of our democracy, our constitutional republic, than what these people did and those two guys. They gave me a hint. I had no idea. It was a lot worse than I ever imagined.
Speaker 1:Yeah, and they might not have even known how bad it was. Later in the show, we're going to introduce you to Admiral Mike Rogers, who's another one of these people that very well may have saved America. All right, so this is Donald Trump he's being asked about. You know all these disclosures that have been going on, and you know Trump seems pretty set on what he wants to see.
Speaker 10:Great, actually we had the Russia. I had to go through the Russia Russia hoax, to go through the Russia Russia hoax and it was actually it's. It was a strain on the relationship. I actually told him. I said you know, they got this phony investigation going on Russia, russia, russia totally phony created by Adam Schiff, shifty Schiff and Hillary Clinton and the whole group of them, and it made it very dangerous for our country because I was unable to really deal with Russia the way we should have been. I'm looking at Pam because I hope something's going to be done about it. These people put our country at great danger. And Adam Schiff it was all made up. It was a hoax.
Speaker 10:The Mueller report came out. They all hated me. They had 18 Trump haters and they said I did nothing wrong. They were, they could, they couldn't believe, they couldn't find anything After years of investigation. It was all a hoax. It was a hoax created by the Democrats, but in particular, schiff, and crooked Hillary, the whole group. And now we've learned all the stuff that's come out over the last two months is incredible through intelligence and hopefully something is going to happen with it. These are people that put our country in danger, in real danger. I want to thank you all very much.
Speaker 1:Thank you very much yeah, they put our country in real danger. It wasn't just about you know the status quo. They prevented peace with russia and settlement with russia. They the ukraine war, in my opinion, is a direct domino fall of the Russia hoax and the Ukraine impeachment and just everything going on there. Russia was begging us to deal with, you know, the Crimea and the 2014 coup in Ukraine and they were begging us for help Nothing. Did you watch Joe Rogan with Anna Paulna paulina luna yesterday? No, so I saw clips. I didn't watch the actual podcast dude. She went full on alien book of enoch. She talked about seeing pictures and stuff in a skiff of extraterrestrial life, interdimensional beings. She talked about they have technology that they cannot reverse engineer. She's like it would be like dropping a cell phone off to cavemen, like no capacity to do anything, that they have this radiating technology and uh yeah you gotta watch it you gotta watch it she went full-on book of enoch and everything man and she's got a biblical worldview.
Speaker 1:But holy smokes, holy smokes. She talked about anarchy. Talk about Anaki. Interesting times. Interesting times. So this is John Solomon again talking about the investigation into Adam Schiff and whether the Clinton pay for play scheme was going on, which is part of the article I just read racket.
Speaker 8:We've all known for a long time that James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton without authority to do so and without finishing his investigation when it came to the classified emails.
Speaker 8:Tonight, we're going to tell you about the other Clinton investigation, one that was running in three separate FBI offices New York, Washington and Little Rock. It was a predicated criminal investigation that was examining whether Hillary Clinton ran a pay-to-play scheme that delivered favors from her purchased Secretary of State while foreigners and others paid large sums of money to her family foundation, the Clinton Foundation, run by Bill Clinton and their daughter, eventually, Chelsea Clinton. Three separate agencies, three separate bureaus, offices of the FBI believe they had predicated evidence to pursue that Every time they tried to move the ball down the road in the shadows of the 2016 election, they got shut down. I mean, they got shut down at the highest levels of their agency, Andrew McCabe, the deputy director, a man who potentially had a conflict of interest with Hillary Clinton. He his wife got money from Hillary Clinton's former campaign chair to run for a Virginia state Senate and, by the way, McCabe attended the meeting where that assistance was solicited. He eventually was conflicted out, but not before he gave the order.
Speaker 1:Mccabe attended the meeting where they asked the Clintons for money. Abe attended the meeting where they asked the Clintons for money, just line them up and shoot them, man.
Speaker 7:What is going?
Speaker 1:on here, I don't know, I went to prison for shaking a bike rack. I went to prison for shaking a bike rack man. I was in there with a guy that was serving a couple of years because he stole $70,000 in PPE loan funds $70,000. $70,000. Couple years because he stole seventy thousand dollars in ppe loan funds. You know, seventy thousand dollars. Seventy thousand dollars. The clintons are dealing in billions, billions yeah you know, seventy thousand dollars, that's a tragedy, that's a crime.
Speaker 7:Billions, that makes me smart I don't even know what to say, I'm just speechless meanwhile he's shutting down investigations into clinton's that they just solicited money from.
Speaker 1:Yeah, um, okay, like prima facie problems like on its face.
Speaker 8:It is agents that you won't investigate or do anything on this unless I approve it. Downstream from them, four, three different from them four different US attorneys' offices under Barack Obama were asked for help by the agents. Agents need help. We need a grand jury, we need to get evidence, we want to move the case down the road. All three of those four offices told the agents you're on your own, we will not assist you in your pursuit of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton. And then, perhaps the most extraordinary statement in the document that we are going to show you on screen now they can put it up as you're looking here the deputy attorney general for Barack Obama, sally Yates, explicitly told the FBI shut it down, meaning the corruption probes of hillary clinton. Think about this. While donald trump was out on the campaign trail chanting lock her up. Maybe there was a good reason to lock up hillary clinton, he would argue. Every night, the obama justice department was telling the fbi agents who also thought there might be a reason to lock up hillary clinton shut it down.
Speaker 1:Remember those words but you know, I mean, it's not that big a deal when you really think about it in the big scheme of things, because at the end of the day, it's what we believe that matters. It's not what we know. Can we say that? Not what we know, it's what we believe.
Speaker 9:So, for example, if you're a democrat and you believe this, then this is all like just probably a hoax itself uh and I'll knock on some wood here because we got two months left I am extremely proud of the fact that over eight years we have not had the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations, and when I met with the president-elect, I suggested to him that having a strong White House counsel that could provide clear guideposts and rules would benefit him and benefit his team, because it would eliminate a lot of ambiguity and I think it will be up to him to make determinations about how he wants to approach it. I know what worked for us and I think it served the American people well, and because I had made a promise to the American people that I would not fall into some of the familiar habits of Washington, that I wanted a new kind of politics, this was one indicator and at the end of eight years I think I can say the American people I delivered on that commitment.
Speaker 1:It's good.
Speaker 7:Does that say Lima, Peru, yeah?
Speaker 1:he was in Lima, peru. Okay, well, I think that's good. I mean a scandal-free presidency for eight years. I mean it's great, you're controlling the media. You've got the FBI shutting down investigations into your cabinet members that are doing pay-for-play schemes. I mean, yeah, no, it's a totally new way of doing business in DC, like it used to be. We might actually find some of that stuff out in real time. But no, you got that figured out. That's a new way of doing business.
Speaker 1:It's scandal-free and it doesn't matter. What we know, doesn't matter what's real, just matters what we believe, you know. And I think that's why trump was like hey, you know, we'll let hillary clinton go. She's, you know, spent through enough. It's hard enough, because what we believe right, we want to maintain the sanctity of the sanctity of the presidency. Unfortunately, they kept calling donald trump a traitor and a russian asset hitler, and so I think the seal on that's pretty much broken at this point.
Speaker 1:And there's other players players in this too, because, remember, the conspiracy isn't just covering up Hillary Clinton, it's not just going after General Flynn, it's not just creating a Russiagate narrative, it's not also pulling all the levers of voter fraud and gerrymandering during that time period. And then it's not just covid and the lockdowns and the destruction of the economy to make it so that the roaring Trump 2019 economy couldn't continue. It wasn't just about getting mask, mandate, compliance and stuff like that and getting you to inject things into your arms that hadn't been properly researched. It wasn't about suspending the state constitutions so that you could have emergency powers in order to take in millions of mail-in ballots in states that have never done that. And then it wasn't just about changing the way that votes were counted from.
Speaker 1:You know distinct, decentralized, elementary but, instead of putting it in large, centralized counting centers. It wasn't just about bad plumbing in those different places, separated by hundreds of miles, that, just simultaneously with one hour, all had shut down plumbing issues where the counting got stopped. It wasn't just that. It wasn't just about Joe Biden declaring himself the president elect and then starting the office of president elect, which has never happened before. It wasn't just that. It wasn't just about the CIA slow rolling the report, saying that China interfered with the election and Russia did not. It wasn't just that. It wasn't just about the Republicans having a weak spine and not saying, hey, there's clearly some type of voter fraud here on, you know, perpetrated by the same people Perkins, cooley, mark Elias who kind of perpetrated this whole Russiagate thing. It's not just all about that. You know what I mean. Like you got to. It's not just that, because you know we could just brush all that under the rug, right? Yeah?
Speaker 1:I mean it's not like it's all connected.
Speaker 7:It's not like it's the same people it's not like it's all affecting my life.
Speaker 1:A hundred percent yeah, no, nothing at all. So I mean just just for context, like you know. I mean they're still looking into some of the connections, like anthony fauci and the bio labs and how all that went down. This is tulsi gabbard talking about it, but the thing that um.
Speaker 19:We are working with uh jay badacharya, the new nih director on uh, with, as well as secretary kennedy. Um is looking at the gain of function research uh that, in the case of the wuhan lab, as well as many others around, many of these other bio labs around the world, was actually US funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.
Speaker 14:Let me ask you specifically because we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to do gain, to do gain of function research. That's right. We just have never been able to have somebody say and it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug, but have we gotten there? What's the new thing that you're digging in on?
Speaker 19:We are working on that with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that, hopefully very soon. Okay, that specific link Correct, adacharya, and look forward to being able to share that, hopefully very soon.
Speaker 14:Okay, that that specific link, uh correct between the gain of function research and what we saw with covet 19 I mean that would be extraordinary because, just so the audience knows if that's true, if it was peter dazik's research with the wuhan, and what would be really crazy is if we then got some connection that there was some like reason to have it happen in 2020, right during the week of impeachment over ukraine.
Speaker 1:You know what I mean. Like how funny would that be if it like not only did we create the virus, but what if we actually released the sucker? Yeah, timely timely, yeah, and got. And of course we know china was meddling in the election and they were more than willing to make it look like wuhan was having people drop dead in the streets and I mean it was dystopian.
Speaker 7:Oh yeah, remember the images of them welding doors shut welding doors shut.
Speaker 1:You remember the piles of cell phones and all those 20 million less cell phone contracts this month and one month? Oh my gosh 20 million. What if? What if?
Speaker 7:What if what if. What if, what if.
Speaker 1:Do you remember this? Do you remember scenes like this happening literally like every day? Some people in our audience? This is going to give you cold sweats.
Speaker 3:I'm sorry but you need a mask if you're going to be in here, that's okay.
Speaker 9:I know I'm sorry, but you're not going to treat people like that. What?
Speaker 17:do you mean Sheriff? Hey Joe, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 10:Hey, hey, tony. How are we doing? We're fine. If a healthy person with a mask gets exposed to a COVID-19 person without a mask, then they've got a 70% chance of catching it.
Speaker 12:But if we all wear them, then we can reduce the transmission rate to 1.5.
Speaker 9:You don't even know what you're talking about. 1.4% of nothing is what?
Speaker 10:And actually, Joe, this is simple because there is a state mandate.
Speaker 1:No, it's not enforceable. It is enforceable. That's the sheriff in the movie, right? No, it's not enforceable. What is 1.45% of zero? You don't know what you're talking about, right? They subjected us to that. That happened to us. I thought I had to interact with the police over mass Right, I got. I got banned from goodwill because I wouldn't wear a mask.
Speaker 7:I remember when I first came to this podcast I was like hey, what's gaslighting there? There you go, that's gaslighting there.
Speaker 1:There you go, that's gaslighting. Yeah, I don't trust the government says pray the rosary daily to handle anything in california unless it aligns with their corruption. They're in the news trying to steal the homes, the palisade fires and put up low-income housing yeah, which you know is not going to be low income. It's ridiculous. Okay, charlie kirk mentions the covid stuff on msnb or c CNBC. He's actually made a big step up. He's making the mainstream media. He's not just making Fox News hits. He was on him. I think he was on Morning Joe on MSNBC and here he is on CNBC. I remember Candace Owens one time told Joe Rogan Charlie Kirk will be president one day. I think he's going to make a play for politics at some point.
Speaker 17:I mean clearly he's going to make a play for politics at some point. I mean, clearly and with the wimp, would you ultimately like a more a country that's brought, that's genuinely brought together, that trusts what's happening, that feels that everything is credible, that there's a coming together? I assume you want that Of course, but in a post-COVID world.
Speaker 10:And again how could that ever happen with the left or the right?
Speaker 20:I think I totally agree and I'll just say look in a post-COVID world we are just an idealist to believe that.
Speaker 17:Hold on, andrew. You're not the left, you're not intolerant, you're not going with this.
Speaker 20:We did not receive any apologies from the ruling class that lied to us repeatedly during COVID the lockdowns, the efficacy of the vaccine, the mask mandates, school closures and we just act as if it didn't happen. And I don't think the American ruling class understands the undermining of their credibility. That happened when the entire country had their lives thwarted, especially young people. We're just supposed to reopen the country and be like well, why don't you trust us anymore?
Speaker 20:Well, it's because all you have the Hunter Biden laptops, russian disinformation the intel operation, signed this letter and you know I'm making a good point here because there was no contrition. That is one example, and again I could go one after the other.
Speaker 17:I would say that actually COVID to me, I mean, this is actually generational, is actually very much like the 2008 crisis in a way that spawned Occupy Wall Street. This has sort of spawned a different sort of political movement. Do you want to do Russian?
Speaker 3:collusion Do you want to do the laptop, Do you want to do? I mean, take your pick on the way things are covered in this country.
Speaker 17:All I'm suggesting, though, is this full-on, constant re-litigation of what took place in the past, as opposed to a clear-eyed view of what's happening now.
Speaker 20:I would just interject respectfully that it's not just really. First of all, no one was held accountable largely for what happened.
Speaker 17:That's why I said it's sort of like 2008, because a lot of people thought all those bankers were supposed to go to jail.
Speaker 20:frankly, and honestly there should have been. I think there should have been some administration of justice. That's a separate issue. I was I was young at the time. I can only speak about what we're living through now and a lot of the covid injustices we are still seeing today with younger people and their ability to own homes, with the inflation that President Trump is trying to fix. That was inherited by Joe Biden. So what I'm getting at and I know a lot of the C-suite of America watches this program. They might understand where is this populist fervor coming from is that you have missed the mark on so many of the proclamations you made to the american people. Explain to me.
Speaker 1:explain I love how that guy's like well, we just leave it in the past it's kind of like the 2008 crisis.
Speaker 7:Yeah, yeah, not really not really.
Speaker 1:Yeah, exactly, not really. So here's one. You know we haven't gotten an apology for this stuff yet.
Speaker 7:No, these people are still, they all don't even want to admit that anything even happened.
Speaker 1:Let's see if I can zoom this in.
Speaker 16:I'm definitely not going to be able to read this, oh shoot.
Speaker 7:Okay.
Speaker 1:All right. So this is an email from James Clapper, who was the director of national intelligence. That's Tulsi Gabbard's position currently to Rogers, michael Rogers, john Brennan and James Comey, and Stephanie O'Sullivan was CC. Dear Mike, john and whatever, jim, I understand your concern. It is essential that we man, this is a horrible copy. Okay, it is essential that we. This is, ah. All right, let me find it somewhere else here. Give me just a moment. That was a bad copy. Other ones, other better ones, I've got saved. I zoomed in my screen and now everything's like does your your phone.
Speaker 1:Do you have your phone set on old man vision? No like the letters are big and stuff. No, I can see great so my phone's been making the switch oh and it's been frustrating because it's I'm not making.
Speaker 7:I'm not making the switch, it's making the switch oh, it's just things that you can't see and boom.
Speaker 1:I think so like I think it's doing the whole facial tracking thing. It must see me squinting or something that's probably watching your eyes go like this all right, I understand your concern.
Speaker 1:it is essential that we cia, nsa, fbi, odni be on the same page, and we are all supportive of the report in the highest tradition of quote. That's our story and we're sticking to it. This evening, cia has provided the NIC the complete draft generated by the fusion cell. We will facilitate mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but more time is not negotiable. We may have to compromise our normal modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule. This project is one that has to be a team sport. Jim James Clapper Sounds like some code. That's our story and we're sticking to it. Barack Obama says Trump's an agent and Pete on hookers in Moscow, and so this is a team sport. Everybody needs to pull the same direction.
Speaker 7:Right what? Make sure you're on board, and so this is a team sport. Everybody needs to pull the same direction. What?
Speaker 1:Make sure you're on board. So Mike Rogers, who's Admiral? Mike Rogers, who's, at this point, the head of the National Security Administration, replies this I've just returned from a TDY overseas and been updated on the current status of our efforts to produce. Joint product related to Russia attribution and intent of the DNC-DCC hacks. Joint product related to Russia attribution and intent of the DNC DCC hacks. I know that this activity is a is on a fast track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the president.
Speaker 1:However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to know of some concerns I have with what I'm hearing from my folks. Specifically, I asked my team if they had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points, my team raised concerns that they were. They were clear that at the staff level, folks have been forward leaning and trying to ensure that we have an opportunity to review and weigh in. But I'm concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren't fully comfortable saying that they've had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments. To be clear, I'm not saying that we disagree substantively, but I do want to make sure that when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don't have any reason to hesitate because of the process.
Speaker 1:I know that you agree with this is something that we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the president. We have one chance to get this right and it's critical that we do so. If the intent is to create an integrated product of the CIA, fbi, nsa jointly authored that we can all defend, we need a process that allowed us all to be comfortable, and I'm concerned that we are not there yet. In addition, if NSA is intended to be a co-author of this product, I personally expect to see even the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion. However, if your intent is to create a CIA only or CIA FBI authored product product, then I will stand down on these concerns. I would welcome your thoughts on these points and any adjustments we might we might make to the process to ensure that we all have the necessary level of confidence in the final assessment. Vr mike, admiral mike rogers, united states navy commander. Us cyber command director, director, nsa Chief, CSS Fort George G Meade, md. Wow, that's a lot of titles, so Stand down sailor.
Speaker 1:I'm not doing it. He's like I got some reservations and I'm going to have to be under oath at some point. I'm not doing it and you may remember this NPR reported on November 22nd 2016,. Just a few weeks after the election, NSA head meets with Trump, but team doesn't give Obama heads up. Admiral Mike Rogers, after seeing what they did to create that intelligence report, privately went and met with Donald Trump and Trump Tower.
Speaker 1:A lot of people have been paying Donald Trump a visit at Trump Tower in New York City mostly people being considered for jobs in the new administration but one meeting stands out Navyiral mike rogers sat down with trump. He is the head of the national security agency, he's in the military chain of command and it appears he never told the commander in chief he was doing. This author and columnist james bamford writes about the intelligence community and says it is hard to underestimate the roles right rogers played. He is really the most. He has really the most important job basically in the history terms of intelligence, because the nsa has everything and he could see what they were doing. He could see their communications and then they wanted him to basically pretend like he hadn't and he went and warned trump and that's what set, that's what tipped Trump off. So Trump has Adam Schiff and Hillary Clinton dead to rights.
Speaker 2:This is Mike Benz talking to Benny Johnson about you have a post up saying Hillary Clinton is absolutely guilty of a criminal conspiracy to defraud the American taxpayers and Intel community and so on. How would that prosecution go? Is that like too much of a pipe dream to even dream, to even dream about? Dare a boy, dream Mike.
Speaker 3:I'm dreaming right now. I think that Trump was merciful and naive and innocent when he first became president in 2017, after saying that Hillary Clinton would be in jail. And then Hillary Clinton campaigned on putting Trump in jail. They nearly did. They shot him in the face, they hit him with 91 felonies, 1,000 years in prison if Trump didn't win the election. And now you know they're dead to rights here.
Speaker 3:Hillary Clinton clearly approved this plan to falsify information in order to portray Donald Trump as being backed by Russia, and they conspired with the head of the Central Intelligence Agency the information in order to portray Donald Trump as being backed by Russia, and then conspired with the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, the head of the FBI, potentially the former president of the United States himself. I don't think you're going to have riots in the streets if John Brennan and Hillary Clinton are arrested. Hillary clinton is, uh, is not exactly a beloved figure on the left. I, I think that you could. I could see there being a tremendous amount of civil disturbance if barack obama is indicted, even though he looks guilty as well, but I, I, I think that he and then you also don't know immunity he also has immunity.
Speaker 3:Hillary doesn't think that, and then you also don't have immunity. He also has immunity, hillary doesn't right, but I think that you don't even need um. I think that that having hillary clinton and john brennan indicted for this um, you as and simply alleged the conspiracy that that they falsified information to conducted fraud, to falsify intelligence in order to run this, this gambit, and then their only defense is that they really believe their own BS. I mean, that's the only defense that they would have. You have an agreement and an affirmative act in furtherance, so you have the two necessary legal components in order to bring the indictment. Their only defense is that, well, we really believe that russia? Uh, it wasn't. We didn't know it to be, even though it was false. We didn't know it to be false at the time, and I think that's belied, uh, by several things.
Speaker 3:We have the, have the circumstantial evidence around intent from these emails in the classified annex, the emails in John Brennan's handwritten notes, but they didn't. This was the magic behind the Trump prosecution. They never had an intent for Trump to commit crimes, but they charged him anyway. This Justice Department, if that's rule of law, then it has to be brought against for for trump to commit crimes, but they charge them anyway. They can this justice department. If that's rule of law, that has to be brought against hillary clinton and john brennan too if that's rule of law, it has to be brought against john brennan and hillary clinton.
Speaker 1:However, the media is making some shocking admissions eve over at cnn, as ed here describes. They are admitted that the prosecution against Trump was part of the operation Advisors Liz Smith seemed to let the cat out of the bag.
Speaker 20:This week telling CNN all those felony convictions against the president were not a real case, just part of a planned Democrat Party resistance.
Speaker 21:Why the base is mad at some of the leaders in Washington is not because they're not left enough. It's because, you know, chuck Schumer came out with no strategy, no forewarning, and just said we're going to fold on the CR. I mean, I think he could have done a better job of explaining what the strategy was and what we're going to do, but there wasn't anything like that. I think Democrats are learning, and I'm going to agree with you that Democrats cannot only be the party of resistance. We cannot, like. We resisted so hard between 2017 and 2024.
Speaker 21:Like we prosecuted him, convicted him of 34 felony counts and guess what? He still got elected. So I don't know how much harder you can resist.
Speaker 6:Are you admitting that the case against Trump in New York was part of the organized Democratic party?
Speaker 21:It was a Democratic prosecutor and I thought it was unwise. I went on Fox News and said it wasn't wise. There were a lot.
Speaker 6:Just to be clear everybody who now touts the 34 felonies take it from Liz. This was not a real case. This was a plot to upend the presidential campaign.
Speaker 21:I just think it was a boneheaded move by Alvin Bragg.
Speaker 9:Spinning. In some ways. The liberal lawfare never ended, with Comey still showing symptoms.
Speaker 7:Dude.
Speaker 1:Symptoms. The liberal lawfare never ended with comey still showing symptoms, dude symptoms. So the democrats you know, they know these cases weren't real, they know this was part of the resistance ever, and you know I can like mike bent says their only defense is they drank the kool-aid. That's their only defense. But you can't give that credit to everybody. For, for example, svetlana Lakova, who is she? She's the woman that the Obama administration, through this whole Russiagate thing, accused of having an affair with General Flynn and she's like a mother of a brand new seven-month-old baby and happy, and all of a sudden the news on the biggest newspapers in the world Svetlana Lakova and General Flynn are having an affair.
Speaker 1:You know how that went over in General Flynn's marriage.
Speaker 1:You know, how that went over in her marriage Not so well. They have no connection. They met each other for like seven minutes at a dinner and all of a sudden they're having an affair you know what I mean. Like it was big deal, and she's an English citizen, I believe. And so she goes. She posts this. No wonder Nicole Wallace was looking totally miserable when she had to report the news of the Russian hoax conspiracy grand jury Her when he was at the SGE and after he resigned from the FBI.
Speaker 1:The investigation revealed Richmond this is her ex-husband had been the source for Michael Schmidt, one of the reporters credited with writing the article at issue in the New York Times since at least 2008. Richmond first spoke with Schmidt regarding the investigation into illegal activity in sports Prior to Richmond becoming the SGE. Schmidt visited Richmond's house numerous times. The New York Times quoted Richmond several several times, both on the record and on background and stories regarding jim comey. After he was terminated by president trump, comey used richmond as a conduit to convey the media memoranda of his meeting with president trump.
Speaker 1:Oh, illegal leaks going to this man and he just happened to be at the time this woman's husband. So she is living in a house where her husband is receiving Some more news breaking this hour to tell you about of lies and is reporting them in the New York Times, the paper of record, and here she is reporting on the grand jury investigations. That likely and I believe he's now her ex-husband, by the way, but I'm sure there's some overlap here between her and him and the involvement, what they knew and when they knew it.
Speaker 12:That's why she has ordered a grand jury investigation into the so-called Russia gate conspiracy allegations made by the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. The senior Trump administration official, confirms to NBC news that investigation was first reported by Fox news. These are unsubstantiated and largely you watched it happen.
Speaker 1:You watched it happen. These are unsubstantial. You were part of it. You have firsthand knowledge. You're probably going to go to a grand jury and be like did you know your husband was meeting with the fbi and receiving not only illegal classified leaks but incorrect ones to boot? Do you know that you were a part of an operation psyop the american people? These are unsubstantiated.
Speaker 7:You were there I'm gonna take the fifth. I'm taking the fifth. Yeah, you're gonna hear a lot of that gravy. Oh man, now laura logan, I'm sorry to break into your thought here. I just got a alert on my phone that they're doing level three evacuation in thurston county for entire towns. What, yeah, um, I'm I'm not sure what this is about, but this might have something to do with oh, it's brush fires. I was like, oh shoot, I was just talking to my wife yesterday is the reactor going down?
Speaker 7:blowing the. What I was just talking to my wife yesterday about the possibility of mount rainier blowing it's top.
Speaker 1:Okay, so that's brush fires yeah, okay, we can handle a brush fire, but if rainier goes, I'm I'm out.
Speaker 7:Yeah that's why I was like I gotta break a boat.
Speaker 1:I go, hijack a yacht and just head straight west. Just go until the rocking stops. Holy cow, that would be bad.
Speaker 7:That was a close one oh, the thing that kind of teed me off was it the south end of rainier road and I was like rainier oh the whole town of being evacuated.
Speaker 1:Uh, jason shepherd. Jason Shepard, who? This right here was reported by Laura Logan. She posted this and she said take a look at how invasive they were when going after American citizens for a quote insurrection that never happened. They will do it again, given half a chance. They only stopped because you, the people, stopped them by electing Donald Trump. So it's going through.
Speaker 1:You're saying basically all the information they wanted from social media companies and all the different sources they could get it. But this is what really caught my eye here All internal or external reviews, studies, reports, data analysis and related communications regarding your platform and misinformation, disinformation and misinformation relating to the 2020 election. So basically anybody who posted anything excuse me, counter narrative to 2020 efforts to overturn, challenge, otherwise interfere with the 2020 election or the certification of electoral college results. I got a lot of information there and this is what really got me domestic violent extremists, including racially or ethically motivated violent extremists, militia violent extremists, sovereign citizen violent extremists which, by the way, when I've met most sovereign citizens, whatever that means, means I've been accused of being. They're not violent, they just think that they're living and they think that you know the law should provide some protections to them and not be constantly asking things from them.
Speaker 7:And most of the time, they just want to be left alone.
Speaker 1:Yes, that's exactly right. They just want to be left alone to grow their carrots. They would really appreciate it if they could drill a well without jumping through every hoop known to man.
Speaker 7:They're sovereign carrots and their sovereign water the sovereign citizens.
Speaker 1:I find it hilarious, because sovereign citizen is not a threat to anybody, but the power itself. Okay, that's it. They're not a threat to anybody, but power itself. They're not a threat to their neighbors, they are not a threat to the local police department or the sheriffs. They are not a threat to the local walmart they are the most agreeable people around. They just are a threat to the power structure itself and some of them are a little bit confused well, sure, I mean.
Speaker 1:who's not confused in a world where trump's a Russian agent and Hillary's Well, yeah. Dollars and put on your mask, because then we can lower the spread rate from zero to zero.
Speaker 7:Well.
Speaker 1:I'm not saying the rest of us aren't confused, they're just a little confused. I'm like you know it could be everyone else's Like there's a real, there's a real possibility Sovereign citizens actually haven't figured out. You guys are the fools that are putting on masks, and you know what I mean. Like like hello yeah, we overthrew the british empire over a two percent t tax I'll say you're over here, being like marginally, I only pay about 67 of my income in taxes.
Speaker 7:I'll say it again, I'm not saying that we're all not confused they're a little confused.
Speaker 1:Well, who wouldn't be in this world? Violent extremist QAnon OK, there you go. And other extremists associated with efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including January 6th 2020 attack, attacks against other state capitals and attempted attacks against the 2020 inauguration of Joseph R Biden Jr. Foreign malign influence the 2020 election, including known or suspected coordination between foreign and domestic influences to interfere in the 2020 election.
Speaker 7:And then, of course, they want to exclude everything from china I used to tell my kids when I drop them off for school um, in the morning, when I when they're out the door, I'd be like, have fun storming the castle, have fun storming the castle.
Speaker 1:So Donald Trump wrote this. He said very unfair media is working on my meeting with Putin, constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, putin has already won. What's that all about? We are winning on everything. The fake news is working overtime. No tax on overtime, by the way. If I got Moscow and Leningrad free as part of the deal with Russia, the fake news would say that I made a bad deal. But now they've been caught. Look at all of the real news that's coming out about their corruption. They are sick and dishonest people who probably hate our country, but it doesn't matter because we are winning on everything.
Speaker 1:My wife and I were talking about the asian comedian that we did yesterday. Where he goes. You know if you're talking to someone who's like well, let's take mag. I mean, make america great again. I mean it seems reasonable. America is not doing so. Hot math scores are down, test scores are down, blah, blah. You know he goes on.
Speaker 1:And then you know there was a. There was a social pact made with promise to the people that if they went to school, got good grades, got a good, a good job and were good citizens, that everything would work out, and those promises never really materialized. And then, you know, he started outsourcing to China and sent all the manufacturing to Asia. And because some of you guys didn't stay in school, we don't really make anything here. And now he goes. But you don't read enough and don't have the vocabulary, so it just comes out as let's go. That's how I feel here. The idea of the peasants. I don't know what you're doing, but it's wrong. Poke, poke, poke with the pitch, for you know. Oh, all right, so we have reached the end of this part of the show. So we are going to jump over to private and we've got a couple more videos to watch one from katherine austin fits talking about the central banks and how they're sovereign, and then we're going to hear about eric weinstein and how physics has come to a complete halt you want an outro.
Speaker 1:You want to skip the outro oh man, we got about 15 seconds. People in the chat can decide if they want an outro or not, otherwise we can skip it. I don't see anybody commenting yet. I know there's a delay.
Speaker 7:Well, yeah, they're typing furiously, but it takes about 20 seconds for us to get it, oh let's see, we'll give it five, five.
Speaker 1:Oh, left behind without. Don't forget to visit left and behind way now, I haven't been good about plugging that on the um, public side. Uh, things are going really well over there. They had a board meeting. I just hear secondhand it just everybody knows I have no direct involvement in left behind without. I just you know every now and then Nancy Pelosi's husband.
Speaker 1:Yeah, yeah, my wife, my wife will tell me. You know I have a board meeting today and you know can you watch the kids or whatever, so I'm aware of when things happen. But they, they have been helping multiple I mean so many families, over a hundred kids, just amazing feedback, doing presents and stuff for them. It's just awesome. And they're constantly working on grants. That seems to be their whole life is working on grants and little $500 grants here, a thousand dollar grants there, and then, of course, private donors, some people sending a hundred dollars a month. It all makes a huge difference. They said that they'd raised she told me she'd raised $5,000 in private donors this last year. Wow, all of that went to kids, all of it. It's amazing, it's just it's so awesome.
Speaker 1:And then, of course, they got a decent size grant that supported them through most of the year. And again, it's just such a good little program. And they do things like go stand out in front of the Walmart with a booth. Walmart's been a really good supporter. By the way, they up their donations. They do like a quarterly donation, which is really fun. I just I'm constantly impressed with my wife and putting that together and continuing to do it. I mean it. Like many, many times I've thought that is the last legacy of this. Everything that I'm doing is was just so that she could start that, you know, and I hope someday that that thing lives on in perpetuity and can help thousands and thousands and thousands of kids.
Speaker 7:Well, and I also hope that we get our elections figured out.
Speaker 1:Yeah, that too, that too, and I'm hoping the prison population decreases, decreases, so there's less kids you need to do that with. But all right, nobody commented in the chat so we're gonna go out without an outro. So we will talk to you guys that are not on rumble premium tomorrow and those of you that are sticking around. We'll see you in seconds. Are we private now?
Speaker 7:Are we private now? Well, trying to Update stream. Stream exclusively.
Speaker 1:We're exclusive Good late morning peasants, Okay.
Speaker 7:Not working.
Speaker 1:It's not working.
Speaker 7:No, so we're still public. Yeah, all right. We're just hanging out with the drab public Public on YouTube. Oh, my goodness, all right Well we can finish it.
Speaker 12:We just got a couple videos we're schlepping and plumbing here All right, so this is Catherine Austin Fitz.
Speaker 1:Regardless of whether we're private or not, you're here, we're still. You know something rhymed with that. All right, you're All right, you're here, and this is Katherine Austin Fitz, and she's talking about banking, central banking specifically. A little bit of music in the background on this, but it's just another one of those tidbits that most people don't know. If you look at the group of people who meet, okay, so now we're private. Welcome private people.
Speaker 18:If you look at the group of people who meet through the BIS. What's that? Bis is the Bank of International Settlements and it's the central bank of central banks.
Speaker 20:Where is that?
Speaker 18:located. It's in Basel, Switzerland.
Speaker 1:We'll just refresh it. We'll just refresh it.
Speaker 7:The premium content is fresh, fresh.
Speaker 18:I look at the group of people who meet through the BIS.
Speaker 20:What's that?
Speaker 18:BIS is the Bank of International Settlements and it's the central bank of central banks.
Speaker 20:Where is that?
Speaker 18:it's in basel, switzerland. It has 63 of the most powerful central banks as its members, and the new york fed and the fed are both shareholders. They became shareholders in 1994. In one sentence what's the? What's the purpose?
Speaker 20:of the bank of international settlements.
Speaker 18:Okay, so there are two things you need to know about the bank of international settlements. I'm not sure my brain's big enough for this, but keep going it is it has sovereign immunity.
Speaker 18:What does that mean? It's above the law. It's its own country, right, it's its own country. It has its own police force and, essentially, other than one of its staff being in a car accident or you know minor things, no one has the legal authority to move against it. Number two it can move money and hold it on its bank, on its balance sheet, and manage money secretly. If I want to steal 21 trillion from the US government and park it on the balance sheet of the BIS, it can move it anywhere in the world and it can keep it on its balance sheet secretly.
Speaker 16:First of all, where does its power come from? Who empowered it to have sovereign immunity in the race?
Speaker 18:It was created after World War I and it was created in theory to manage the reparations of the German government. But if you read the real history, it was because the Bank of England and the central bankers wanted an entity that had sovereign immunity.
Speaker 1:Remember that diagram I was drawing for you today, coming from the private, they're their own thing.
Speaker 7:Yeah, I know would it be easier if we could just trade stamps like in prison and why'd she have to pick 21 trillion as a number for her example?
Speaker 1:well, that just happens to be what's missing and what I think was plowed into underground bunkers.
Speaker 7:Oh, I just thought, that was funny though that was funny.
Speaker 1:No, that was. The whole point of that discussion with Joe Rogan was there was 21 trillion missing dollars. She's like it's all in our debt but we have nothing to show for it, and when we actually follow the money where we can, it dead ends in a hole in the ground. Looks like an underground bunker to me. So this is Eric. Eric, what's his name? It's not. It's not Weinstein, is it? Yeah, so Weinstein? Jeez, all right, I knew that was his name, but then I started thinking of the guy that's in jail.
Speaker 1:Can't remember his name.
Speaker 17:Now he's also a.
Speaker 1:Weinstein yeah exactly, all right. So, anyways, he's talking about physics and something that I knew on the periphery, but the way he explains it I'm like, oh, that makes sense.
Speaker 16:Physics has gone stagnant in terms of how we usually measure progress. The way we measure progress is the change in something called the action or the Lagrangian, a specialized device, and that used to change a lot and then in 1973, it stopped changing. The major thing that we have is we have no new ideas about how to change the Lagrangian that anybody finds that exciting or interesting. So there's been no progress. Nobody goes to Stockholm to get a Nobel prize because they changed the Lagrangian of the world and there's this bizarre force field that anybody who wants to talk about physics and doing something new, in particular leaving or traversing time or multiple dimensions of time, anything that's really close to what might be possible gets slammed. And we don't know why, because it's very cheap to explore ideas and we have no new idea. But the only thing about a new idea in physics is that a new idea changes the balance of power in the world.
Speaker 16:Physicists are the only occupation in the country that doesn't have full free speech. My point is I don't think our government knows the real secrets of physics. If I had to make a bet tomorrow, I don't think there's a secret government office that knows physics okay. I think that there were a bunch of very smart people who knew how dangerous physics was and that the idea that we would continue to do it in public struck them as insane because it could lead to destruction. When I tell you that the most dangerous idea in human history is maybe there's a neutral version of the proton, that's supposed to sound insane, but the entire chain of ideas results in nuclear fusion happening on earth at the direction of the president of the united states and that's what I'm trying to get at which people don't understand, which is. You probably don't even realize that the department of Energy is really the Department of Physics, because we pretend that it's the Department of Energy, like we had a war department that became the Department of Defense. We're scared of the possibility of physics. We don't even want to talk about it. Literally no other occupation has lost free speech like physics.
Speaker 16:There is a special doctrine called restricted data that says you cannot write physics on a napkin, even if you have nothing to do with the government I think even if you're not an American if it has anything that could possibly have to do with nuclear weapons, in other words, any advance that might have to do with nuclear weapons. You have to recognize that the instant you put pen to paper or you start talking to somebody, you're committing a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act. And if you think that's crazy, start exploring the words Restricted Data, 1917 Espionage Act, 1946 and 1954 Atomic Energy Acts, the doctrine of born secret. It is illegal to pursue Q clearance data if you don't have a Q clearance. But if you're creating Q clearance data out of your own head as a byproduct of trying to do physics, you are actually potentially committing a capital offense.
Speaker 7:Wow, I didn't know that.
Speaker 1:And you sovereign citizens are wacko, yeah right, all we want to do is think stop, stop. No, that is interesting. I didn't know that and it doesn't surprise me at all it doesn't surprise, it doesn't surprise me at all.
Speaker 1:But again, just going with this larger theme, the government is way bigger than we think it is and it is a smoke monster. It is a house of cards. It is built upon a whole bunch of stuff that, if the American public actually knew and internalized things like the BIS and its sovereign immunity, if they actually internalized and understood things like the FBI covering up some of the most heinous crimes that you can possibly imagine, most heinous crimes that you can possibly imagine, you know, because we haven't even gotten into and we probably won't get into the human trafficking stuff that the clans are alleged to be involved in. You know, when Trump makes a joke about you've stolen a few villages in Haiti, he's not talking rhetorically, like there's really accusations that they smuggled kids out of Haiti you know, and did some bad things down there.
Speaker 1:So if the people knew that we're being held back from things like free energy specifically for the purpose of keeping you on the teat, yeah right, it it'd get pretty rough. It'd get pretty rough. So my, my, my gut feeling is get out now, become self-sustaining now, maybe, you know, be sovereign now I hate to say sovereign citizen, you know, I don't want to be on anybody's list. Oh no, I figure I'm at the top of that list at this point. Anyways, all right, guys. That's it for the show today. We will talk to you guys again tomorrow bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what night.
Speaker 4:Lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 4:Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress. There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do?
Speaker 4:Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king. Didn't know we had a king? I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs Be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major Be quiet.
Speaker 4:I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then. The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 4:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? You, you, you, you, you, you.
