Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Truth Bombs and Paper Calculations: America's Political Shell Game
When the political elite treat average Americans like ignorant peasants, the backlash builds momentum beneath the surface. Our conversation dives into the mounting evidence of institutional corruption and how the system is designed to protect those in power while everyday citizens bear the consequences.
We examine bombshell revelations from John Solomon about how multiple FBI investigations into the Clinton Foundation were systematically shut down by Obama's DOJ. The documentary evidence is damning - three separate FBI field offices had developed predicated criminal investigations only to be told by Deputy AG Sally Yates to "shut it down." This pattern of protecting political allies while weaponizing agencies against opponents represents a fundamental corruption of justice.
The conversation takes a fascinating turn as we analyze the psychological projection employed by political operatives - accusing opponents of the very crimes they themselves commit. From classified documents to foreign influence, this strategy has been deployed repeatedly to create political cover. We also discuss Trump's recent executive order directing the DOJ to investigate ActBlue for potential foreign donations, and the panicked reaction from Gavin Newsom when ICE agents conducted enforcement operations near his rally.
Perhaps most revealing is Trump's candid acknowledgment that our monetary system operates largely as "just a paper calculation," highlighting how disconnected financial governance has become from reality. This mirrors the fraudulent nature of a system where political insiders like Nancy Pelosi achieve investment returns that would "make hedge funds jealous" while everyday Americans struggle.
The growing recognition that we're all just peasants in the eyes of the political class has sparked a revolution of awareness. As more documents are declassified and more whistleblowers come forward, the veil lifts on a system that wasn't designed to serve the people but to maintain power for the connected few. Join us as we connect these dots and explore what it means for America's future.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth Buncheck had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake. We're getting screwed man. Every time we turn, we're getting screwed man.
Speaker 3:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. It's the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man. We're just peasants, Every one of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man. We're just peasants, Every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Oh, it was me. Morning we were doing too bad turned on, but the volume weeding boys.
Speaker 3:Let them eat cake. Yes, I've got to actually do some screen amending here. I've got my screen in a weird arrangement. I've got two screens here and I got to fix it.
Speaker 4:I mean, if they were eating that much cake, maybe that was really good, I don't know. Okay, okay, All right.
Speaker 3:It is Friday and thank goodness. Friday, holy smokes. This week has been a fast. It's gone by fast.
Speaker 4:Yeah, it has. I mean, the older you get. What I've found is that time moves a little faster. Jeez, louise man.
Speaker 3:Take a blink and it's weeks over.
Speaker 4:Yeah, I mean, remember when you were a kid and summer vacation went by like oh yeah, I do. It feels like everyday summer vacation yeah.
Speaker 3:It's too fast Speaking of funny things that happened. I thought this was pretty funny. Let me show you this here. I played this for you yesterday, ron, after the show, and I wanted to play this for the audience. This is Deborah Birx, if you guys are Bricks. If you remember her, she was on the COVID task force. She was the one that was wearing fancy scarves all the time next to Dr Fauci, this lady. So she went on a little tour and she's giving the speech as to why, why, why people didn't get vaccinated out in the country and why they didn't get the COVID help they needed and why they, why they try to take the ivermectin.
Speaker 7:And when I got pulled back for COVID, I was devastated to see what happened. Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher rates in rural areas than any other counties in the United States. If you live in the Central Valley of California, your death rate was three to four times what the urbans were, and that's because they didn't have the same resources. They didn't have testing, they didn't have RendeSavir Everything that you had in the cities they didn't have in rural areas. And I went rural community by rural community and then you wonder why they used ivermectin. Because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet. And that's how things happen.
Speaker 3:And we just, and then we're like, oh my god, and I'm like yeah, oh my god, this is on us, this is on. You're watching this stuff?
Speaker 4:you think, just because we live in the country, we went to veterinarians for primary medical care.
Speaker 3:Yeah, I'm that stupid dude, these people are just so bad. Man, this, this is like insane gaslighting. They think so little of you. It's insane gaslighting. First of all, ivermectin is not horse. I mean, yes, you use it in cattle and horses for deworming. It is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has an amazing amount of things that it can do for you. The idea that, oh, in the rural areas people died more All right, I don't know if that's the case or not, but definitely something to look into. Have you ever taken ivermectin?
Speaker 4:yeah, I haven't. My cousin just started taking it because he had some parasite problems, so he was taking it for real, but it was, you know, a human version from a doctor yeah, I'm just like do you think joe rogan went to a veterinarian right? And then what's up with the like claiming like oh well, they didn't have remdesivir yeah, the the drug that killed people.
Speaker 3:Yeah, bummer, they didn't have testing. And if you were way better off living in the cities, I'm like I think so little of us.
Speaker 4:That's the only thing I could think of there well, they also are like gaslighting the people in the cities too, claiming that all these elements were like oh rem, desert was just great, and make sure you get your third or fourth pcr test, whatever that tells you, oh my goodness, it's so, it's so.
Speaker 3:You know what I mean. Yeah, so uh, last week we've covered patricia lelis, who's a whistleblower who was working with bill barr. Remember that was sitting in on meetings with bill barr and with um armstrong williams and how they were going after january sixers. They were going after trump and bill barr was meeting with fannie willis. Well, if you look on my screen here, she wrote a little note to herself. This was a message notes to myself. Call the FBI number. She got the FBI number. Agent Smith, I'm calling to report. So she's like a note to herself. I'm calling to report. Armstrong Williams, terry Giles, julian Reese. Visa fraud sex parties involving kids. Fannie Willis, bill bar, mary bar, clyde Vannel, sure Mingle, singleton. Kevin Harris, peter Reese, vivian Reese, dc mayor. Turkish airline. Bill barr, mary barr, clyde vannell, sherman, goal singleton. Kevin harris, peter reese, vivian reese, dc mayor. Turkish airline. Qatar ambassador, new york adams, mayor armstrong, asking me to destroy evidence. So that was her bullet point list of things she wanted to talk to the fbi. Anything on that list pop out to you I can't read that.
Speaker 4:Maybe Maybe sex parties involving kids, Well yeah, but I don't know, just the whole thing.
Speaker 3:I'll take going to the vet over stuff like that man. I mean, if that's what comes with city living, I'm out. Yeah, there's a book by Louis L'Amour, or it's called like the Wandering man or the Traveling man, but he talks about cities being this black core that just revolves around itself and I'm like, yeah, that's pretty much what it looks like to me. I mean, you put too many people together and you get bill bars and who knows what else, his dad and his book on intergalactic child sex trade or whatever. Uh, this is a little flashback. You might remember this. Uh, this was back in the 2016 campaign when hillary clinton was just like, hey, I'm all good man, I'm this email thing not a problem.
Speaker 11:Well, there may be reports that come out, but nothing has changed. It's the same story. Um, just like previous secretaries of state, I used a personal email. Many people did. It was not at all unprecedented. I have turned over all my emails. No one else can say that I have been incredibly open about doing that. I will continue to be open, and it's not an issue that is going to affect either the campaign or my presidency that's the only true thing.
Speaker 3:She said it's not an issue that's going to affect things. We've paid the people we need to pay met on the tarmac with people we need to meet with. We're good, we're good I turned over all my emails that were available that we didn't break with a hammer. Meanwhile, john solomon yesterday did break that news and we did cover it on the show because it broke early in the morning about how they were just kept blocking any kind of investigation into hillary clinton.
Speaker 12:Tonight we're going to tell you about the other clinton investigation, one that was running in three separate fbi offices new york, washington and little rock. It was a predicated criminal investigation that was examining whether hillary clinton ran a pay-to-play scheme that delivered favors from her purchased Secretary of State while foreigners and others paid large sums of money to her family foundation, the Clinton Foundation run by Bill Clinton and their daughter, eventually Chelsea Clinton. Three separate agencies, three separate bureaus. Offices of the FBI believe they had predicated evidence to pursue that Every time they tried to move the ball down the road inaus offices of the fbi believe they had predicated evidence to pursue that every time they tried to move the ball down the road in the shadows of the 2016 election, they got shut down. I mean, they got shut down at the highest levels of their agency andrew mccabe, the deputy director, a man who potentially had a conflict of interest with hillary clinton. He his wife, got money from Hillary Clinton's former campaign chair to run for a Virginia State Senate and, by the way, mccabe attended the meeting where that assistance was solicited. He eventually was conflicted out, but not before he gave the order to his agents that you won't investigate or do anything on this unless I approve it Downstream from them.
Speaker 12:Four different US attorneys' offices under Barack Obama were asked for help by the agents. Agents need help. We need a grand jury, we need to get evidence, we want to move the case down the road. All three of those four offices told the agents you're on your own, we will not assist you in your pursuit of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton. And then, perhaps the most extraordinary statement in the document that we are going to show you on screen now they can put it up as you're looking here the deputy attorney general for Barack Obama, sally Yates, explicitly told the FBI shut it down, meaning the corruption probes of hillary clinton.
Speaker 12:Think about this while donald trump was out on the campaign trail chanting, lock her up. Maybe there was a good reason to lock up hillary clinton, he would argue. Every night, the obama justice department was telling the fbi agents, who also thought there might be a reason to lock up hillary clinton shut it down. Remember those words. We have a lot more up for you. In a second we're going to bring in Senator Ron Johnson, someone who's been instrumental in exposing so much. Shut it down.
Speaker 3:So yeah, hillary Clinton, yeah, she paid all the right people Grammy on YouTube post. Project Veritas lost all credibility when they pushed James out. I agree, project Veritas lost some credibility there but their whistleblowers didn't necessarily, and it's just like everything know every time. Every now and then we get news from like msnbc. But we're looking for context and I have no reason not to believe that assistant. She has contemporaneous notes and she made multiple reports to the fbi and they just did nothing. So I don't know, doesn't surprise me too much.
Speaker 4:Yeah, um, what's his name? From veritas, j was james o'keefe. Yeah, james o'keefe I saw a video from him yesterday where he was talking about his uh movement out of veritas and his claim in that video was that some of his partners had products that they were selling to outfits that were ending up at pfizer. Oh really, yeah, and there was money connections there and that's why he was out it doesn't surprise me at all at all, and I know there was.
Speaker 3:There was basically a boardroom coup forum on there.
Speaker 14:Yes, pam bondy was on with uh sean hannity talking about this potential grand conspiracy case, so let's hear what she has to say I know you can't talk about very specific legal action that may be underway or a grand jury that may be impaneled, but we are reading that, in fact, a lot of the information that Tulsi Gabbard has been able to to share with the public and make public, and the same with John Ratcliffe that in fact there are people purposely my interpretation of it seemingly trying to sabotage.
Speaker 14:I'll give you one example the Russia Russia, russia hoax. We had a career senior intelligent assessment of the 2016 election. Then there was an order to go out and get another one because they didn't like the results of the first one. Get another one because they didn't like the results of the first one. We know that a Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier was used for not one but four FISA warrants, and yet they knew very early on that it was debunked and not true. If you lie to a FISA court as a matter of law, don't you have an obligation to go back and tell the court as soon as you know that information you provided that court was inaccurate and not true?
Speaker 10:yeah, sean, I can't confirm or deny whether we have a grand jury, an open investigation on anyone, but the weaponization of our government has ended, and tulsi gabbard, john radcliffe, kash patel, they're doing a great job and no one in this country is above the law.
Speaker 3:All right so it's ended. Do you believe that?
Speaker 4:but uh, I did see, uh hannity's background there. Where was he? He's in alaska, that's what it looked like to me.
Speaker 3:Trump's going to take Hannity with him anywhere he goes. Man, oh, I didn't know that Took him to all the other summits. Yeah, no, hannity there up in Alaska, because they're getting ready to meet with Putin today, which will be really interesting. Not a lot on the show today about that. It's not a lot floating. And then most conservatives people that are supportive are like well, we'll wait and see.
Speaker 4:Yeah, Be a walkout. There's a lot of information like, well, they're meeting today and so-and-so is not going to be there, but there's no real meat yet. Well, they're meeting, meeting, no, no, no, I mean, there's no meat to talk about, no, no, I couldn't find anything that was worth talking about.
Speaker 3:I mean, the only thought, the only thing that was really worth talking about was their uh lazaroff, who's I can't remember if he's there, if he's their ambassador, or if there's their president. I think he's the president of russia. But lazaroff uh showed up in alaska wearing a cc ussr t-shirt or sweater okay, I mean, all right, that'd be like me running around wearing a uh, like you know, 13 colony sweater or something. Yeah, you know I did.
Speaker 3:I did hear that, uh, the ukraine president was not gonna be a show I heard he wasn't gonna be there, but then I heard he might be there okay so he might make a special appearance to sign over his land. I don't know. He's got signs of deeds, the whole thing. It's just such a tragedy.
Speaker 3:The war in russia is just such a tragedy because it's well because of lives lost it was lies lost, but it was pretty much unnecessary like yeah, a hundred percent anyways, cash patel was on with sean hannity as well, and he had actually a lot more to say but there's been a lot of talk and a lot written about the investigation into a grand conspiracy.
Speaker 14:To the extent possible, what can you tell us about that? In other words, that this is long-standing? If it is in fact a conspiracy, the statute of limitations would be eliminated. Is that what the investigation is about?
Speaker 15:Well, Sean, what we're doing is building a case for the American public under the Truth and Transparency and Accountability Initiative, and what I mean by that is AG Bondi brilliantly highlighted our partners, Director Ratcliffe at the CIA and Director Gabbard over at the DNI, is Director Ratcliffe at the CIA and Director Gabbard over at the DNI. We are working with them because the documents that would facilitate an investigation of this magnitude don't just rest at the FBI and DOJ. They're throughout the intelligence community and we, the Russiagate guys like Johnny Ratcliffe and myself, who investigated this and exposed this, are trying to expose documentation that we've known existed for years. At the same time, we're finding new material, so the best approach is to release this information with them and also go to our colleagues in Congress who have an oversight function on the judiciary committees and oversight committees and demand from us information and documentation that we can publicize. Things like the Durham Annex, which we've known have existed this entire time but were classified for political reasons.
Speaker 15:We are educating the American public as we build through this transparency initiative and where the investigation goes, I can assure you of this we will max accountability for the American public. We delivered before when we ran the Russiagate investigation. I now happen to be President Trump's choice for FBI director and I'm honored to lead that charge with our great partners and Johnny Ratcliffe and our great attorney general and the prosecutors they have over there. We're just as committed to justice as everyone should be blindly so. We are going to de-weaponize the FBI and get its credibility back to the American people by delivering the accountability they need, by showing them what we're doing every step of the way. That has never been done before. Here's the beauty of it.
Speaker 15:Sean, you don't have to trust me or trust you. That's all everything you recited. The summer you just gave is years of excavating documents that these deep state actors held and buried and documented their own corruption because they were arrogant enough to think no one would ever find it, that Donald Trump would never become president and appoint a cabinet that would go in and investigate this matter thoroughly. And when you start connecting the dots, here's what I learned, sean, when I ran the Russiagate investigation as bad as the crime is, the corruption cover up from senior government officials who are sworn to uphold their duties and accountability for the crime is the corruption cover up from senior government officials who are sworn to uphold their duties and accountability for the American public. They are the ones that violated that trust the most internally and need to be held accountable. So the people you've listed and the names you're calling out aren't surprises. Their names are on those documents. Those documents are public.
Speaker 15:The FISA is public. The 302s are public. The struck page texts are public. Documents are being released weekly by Johnny Ratcliffe and Tulsi making it public. The burn bag information is coming out. The Durham annex is coming out. The classified appendix is coming out. The American people are going to see and hear the names themselves and they can touch and feel it. As far as what my investigators are going to do, these guys are the best in the business and we've assembled a team of accountability and we're going to deliver for the american people like never before.
Speaker 3:Because that all right. They're going to deliver like they did last time yeah, rah, rah, rah, rah, rah.
Speaker 4:Like which time? I can't remember well where's all the stuff?
Speaker 3:my expectations are low. I I've said this many times my expectations are low, but they're definitely raising my expectations. Yeah, you know like.
Speaker 4:But I can't tell you how tired I am of hearing how it's all going to be exposed eventually.
Speaker 3:It's a decade long.
Speaker 4:Dude, you know some of these verbs that they're using. They're not using them correctly.
Speaker 3:When John Durham indicted Kleinsmith and then turn around and indicted Michael Sussman, I was like, oh, there's something here, but I've never heard assessment, I've never heard of Kleinsmith. And then Kleinsmith pled guilty to a misdemeanor, got a year of probation and got his law license suspended for a year and he's back practicing law right now. And he changed an email in a secret surveillance court called FISA to say that Carter Page was not a CIA operative, when Carter Page was in fact a CIA asset. So you know, I don't know, totally derailed the allegedly. You know, without that changing, that warrant wouldn't have been issued.
Speaker 3:I don't know if, if that's the case, but if he's willing to change an email, there's probably other evidence that's been manufactured. I mean vis-a-vis what trump's been saying about the epstein stuff. But yeah, years and years we've kind of been building up to this. Granted, they've only had control of the doj and the fbi for six months, seven months, and even that's argumentative because, like the guy that raided mar-a-lago, was flying around cash patel up until last week. So yeah, you know, the weaponization has ended, says pam bonnie.
Speaker 4:I could just imagine though, because when you couple that we've been waiting for six months plus for the stuff that was going to drop, day one right, and then you know it's a continuous drip of words of the american people are going to get touch and feel because we're going to show them everything. It's like, okay, why don't you just show us the damn stuff.
Speaker 3:Yeah, I mean, every 13 days they're making a big drop and there's another big drop today.
Speaker 3:It's supposed to be relevant to j6, so I don't know what it's going to be, but the j6 community is all up in a buzz because they're like it's coming out today, all right, I don't know, it'll probably be another one of those like oh yeah, this tells us what we already knew. But now we know it, know it, these people are corrupt. So this is john solomon on megan kelly's show. A lot of john solomon today, but he describes the continual rinse and repeat cover up by projecting the Democrat sins onto Trump, and I think this is a really important narrative for people to understand. When the Democrats blow up and start accusing Trump of doing something, they're almost certainly doing it themselves.
Speaker 12:Listen the way you opened your show. There's no better description of what the conspiracy is. It's a conspiracy to protect potential of Democrats from potential criminal prosecution and then to violate the civil liberties and privacy and reputations of innocent Republicans to create an alternate story to protect political interest, meaning what's going to happen in the election. That's what it is. It's not more complicated than that. I know people say, oh, a conspiracy case is going to be complicated. No, it's really not. We protected Democrats and the cycle is.
Speaker 12:Hillary has two problems Email, now corruption. We can prove that was active at the time. Hunter Biden's got corruption and taxes and, by the way, the first evidence of that comes in March, through May of 2016. And then 2019, it's Senator Biden, a lot more and so we impeached the president and we have the government actually creating stories that I think we will prove were false. And then in 21, they find Joe Biden's classified documents at UPenn office in Washington and his garage and they got to make Donald Trump look like he's the classified guy first, before they can let the cat out of the bag that Joe Biden has the same problem.
Speaker 12:It's a wash, rinse and repeat cycle and in the course of that, two potential crimes are occurring Obstruction of legitimate investigations those are overt acts of a conspiracy and then the violation of innocent people's civil liberties to create a political ruse. That is where I believe the grand conspiracy case is headed. I now believe that there are multiple grand juries that have begun work around this country in multiple jurisdictions outside of Washington where evidence is now being gathered. You do.
Speaker 2:You can report that or you have reason to believe that.
Speaker 12:Nope, I have confirmed witnesses who've had contact with the grand jury. So there are grand juries in multiple locations. Some of those are in Virginia. I believe one is going to begin, based on early discussions, in Pennsylvania. There may be one in New York, and so the activity has begun. And the question now is and those are probably not going to be the indicting locations I think the more likely thing is you use multiple grand juries just to make it easy to gather lots of information quickly. That's the way strike forces work and then you keep working from there. But there are multiple locations where pieces of this are being looked at and maybe the grand jurors don't even know it's a grand conspiracy just looking at some of the overt acts in one of these chapters of this sad story. But that is going on and I think it's going to be a process. Right, it's going to be a process.
Speaker 12:Right, it's going to be a very I don't know the reason yet. I wish I knew. I don't know the reason. I mean, there's lots of. It could be related to the 2020 election. Yeah, that's where my mind.
Speaker 12:Yeah, yeah, so we don't know yet. I just know that certain witnesses have been contacted about acceptance of grand jury subpoenas and they're in different locations. So the process is beginning, but it's a long process and you know, we won't know a lot about if the justice department does the right thing, unlike the Obama and Biden justice departments that leaked anything. The grand jury process will be unbelievably secret and will be masked from it, because that's the way the process is supposed to work. In the meantime, we have an opportunity, through the Freedom of Information Act and through our purchase as reporters, to go out and try to get the story for the American people so they can understand why this is going on. The Democrats, who didn't care about going after our president when it was the Republican, are going to start crying. This is payback, this is retribution. We need Americans to understand. It's not payback and retribution. There are legitimate legal questions here. It's not payback and retribution.
Speaker 3:There are legitimate legal questions here, unless the way you opened your show there's no better description of what the conspiracy is that's why we're getting the releases the way we're getting them, because these are damning documents like these are really damning documents. They're not. It's not a small thing. I mean, we're like, ah, no accountability, but these people are tainted, like they're done. The democrats are calling for adam shift to resign, so we need to just exercise a little. It's not a small thing.
Speaker 4:I mean we're like, ah, no accountability. But these people are tainted Like they're done. The Democrats are calling for Adam Schiff to resign, so we need to just exercise a little more patience, the grand jury process is going to be sealed.
Speaker 3:I don't think we're going to find out grand jury stuff, probably won't even officially find out the locations necessarily. But the evidence that's being brought before the grand jury, I think they're showing it to us. I don't think they're keeping anything secret. I think I think that there's a paradigm shift that's happening and you can hear it when you listen to these guys talking. Cash Patel is telling you you're going to watch us do this every step of the way. We're not going to be able to hide anything because you're going to see the evidence. So if we come out and go, oh, grand jury won't release anything.
Speaker 3:It's not like when Comey gets up and go, you know we've looked at everything and no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this. Well, did you really look at everything? Well, now we know he didn't, but we didn't know what they had looked at. We just assumed they had looked at everything. Well, now we're going to be like, oh, they saw this because they released it to the public. So if they don't indict Brennan or don't indict Clapper, then we are going to point directly at Kash Patel and Pam Bondi and be like you covered up for them? Who covered up for?
Speaker 4:Now we need to have a different kind of indictment.
Speaker 3:So now you're I mean, we already were at the point where the institution of the Department of Justice and the institution of the FBI have been highly put into question. People have been called for abolishing the FBI specifically, and so if they don't create accountability, it's kind of over.
Speaker 4:Yeah.
Speaker 3:You know. I mean, it becomes purely their thugs. That's it, my gang's bigger than your gang. It doesn't become any matter of moral justice or any kind of anything like that. It's just my gang's bigger than your gang. Trump talks about the. He talked about basically the effect that all this russiagate nonsense had on his elect, on on him tulsi gabbard declassified more documents last night related to the russiagate folks she's doing a great job.
Speaker 19:By the way, that was another fake story she's. I'm very happy with the job. She said. That's right. They declassified some terrible documents talking about democrats and what they did Radical left lunatics.
Speaker 18:It showed that DNI, james Clapper, sent out emails to IC officials saying that it would be a team sport to push them to debunk the 2017 ICA report and that it might need them to compromise on their normal modalities. What's your reaction to the latest declassification?
Speaker 3:in his face. What does real accountability look like for the players?
Speaker 19:It's incredible what we're finding Absolute proof of guilt, and we'll see what happens. But Clapper and Comey and that whole group of criminals they're criminals and they made it very tough. You know they did the fake Russia, russia, russia witch hunt that lasted for two years and I get totally exonerated. There was no doubt about it. They should have done it in one day, not two years. But it was a whole scheme to try and demean Trump so that I couldn't win an election. And that is a criminal group of people. They're sick people. We've heard Trump say that many, many times.
Speaker 3:They're sick people and they should be taken care of. It really feels like things are going to happen. Man, it sure does so. Yesterday Gavin Newsom had a little rally out in LA and outside of this rally Donald Trump said that know if donald trump sent it? But ice came outside of gavin newsom's rally and was arresting illegal aliens on the street. So as people are filing into the convention center, you've got these guys out front arresting illegal aliens, like right there. So clearly this causes all kinds of chaos and inside of the rally you've got Kevin.
Speaker 17:Right outside, at this exact moment, are dozens and dozens of ICE agents. Donald Trump, you think it's coincidental? Donald Trump and his minions, Tom Holman, tough guy, totally decided coincidentally or not that this was a location to advance ICE arrests and right now, coincidentally or not decided this is the information to post icers.
Speaker 3:So karen bass has another video where she's like this is not acceptable.
Speaker 6:How dare he do this when we're having a?
Speaker 3:meeting. This is just a big bully and I'm like I don't even know what to think. You guys are such a joke. The american people are completely on board on the positive side at plus one point.
Speaker 21:Americans view trump far more favorably now on crime than they did a year ago. Donald trump is like eric jordan, towering over joe biden when it comes to their handling of crime. Look in 2024. Look at where biden's net approver was on crime way underwater there, at minus 26 points. It was one of biden's worst issues. Granted, pretty much every issue was one of Biden's worst issues. And again look at where Donald Trump is way, way, way above Joe Biden. What is that? That's 27 points. So Americans vastly prefer Donald Trump's approach to crime than they did to Joe Biden In 2023, republicans were favored by 13 points. Look at where they were in May of this year. Republicans were actually favored by 60 points. Look at where they were in may of this year republicans were actually favored by 60 months. They actually gained ground on crime. They were maintaining their edge and actually add a little bit to it man.
Speaker 4:He should be on our channel oh dude, I love that I can't believe we're watching cnn.
Speaker 3:Every time I see one of his clips granted every, every issue of Biden's issue was a bad issue.
Speaker 4:Yeah, I can't believe his producer's like hey, hey, knock it off.
Speaker 3:Yeah, so another thing that happened was somebody sent Gavin Newsom a Trump 2028 hat, and so there were memes all over the place. There was one of Trump like in his closet and he puts a 2028 hat on the shelf, and they superimposed gavin newsom giving this speech. Trump puts the hat on his head and there's there's another one where he's just giving the speech, but the hat's on his head.
Speaker 17:so this is this is gavin newsom just freaking out about trump 2020, fact that we're affirming uh, our independent commission, and we're calling for a national independent commission as well well, I think it's pretty sick and pathetic and it just said everything you need to know the setting that we're under, that they chose the time, manner and place to send their district director outside, right when we're about to have this press conference. Everything you know about donald trump's america and that was top down you know that for a fact. They'll deny it, I'm sure Maybe they won't deny it. Everything you know about the authoritarian tendencies of the President of the United States I said in a moment ago wake up, america, wake up. You will not have a country if he rigs this election. You will have a president who will be, running for a third term.
Speaker 17:Mark my word. I wasn't exaggerating when I said that I received in the mail a Trump 2028 hat from one of his biggest supporters. These guys are not screwing around. The rules do not apply to them. The most corrupt president in history Doesn't believe in free enterprise, crony capitalism. He is wrecking this country, wrecking the economy.
Speaker 3:He's a's a lawless president, wake up, america, wake up to what's going on. I think we can definitively say, I think we can definitively say the democrats will project onto donald trump everything they do. I mean, and it's just, we just bullet pointed at john solomon, then you know, you got. You got covering up for hillary clinton and her involvement with Uranium 1 and Russia Gates. Pen it on Trump Biden's got classified documents. Pen it on Trump Biden's got problems with Ukraine, with his son. Impeach Trump over Ukraine. It's just thing after thing after thing.
Speaker 4:He looks like such a clown.
Speaker 3:He's the most. What is the most lawless presidency Pretty sure we just lived through Obama and Biden, which appeared to be utterly lawless, utterly lawless. Have you read any of these releases? Gavin Newsom? Like listen, the American public I promise they're going to do polling on Trump 2028, and it's going to be like 42 to 47 percent are like yeah, let him run. What a good job he got punked bro.
Speaker 4:He got punked and he's just all mad about it. Oh, I can't believe he would send me a hat.
Speaker 3:Yeah, now Gavin Newsom. Today's episode is great because you can see every day in the news. This is a narrative. It's these people talking to each other. These are the people that hold levers of power and influence, but he gets a hat in the mail and he's like these guys are serious so he freaks out and then. But then he also drops. If we let donald trump rig this election, what is he talking about?
Speaker 6:rig the election, I know right, push the 2020 data, account for the miscounts, the over counts, the under counts which, by the way, oh, like across the board, helped the left. In 2020, the 20. The census bureau admitted that they got it really wrong. It was the worst census in our lifetimes. I believe the 1991 was not great either, but this one, I think, by far outstrips it. In 2010, they were off by 36,000. In 2020, in Texas alone, they were off by 560,000. So it was just a terribly run census. And if you account for all of those corrections, if you account for swings and voter tendencies, especially amongst Hispanics, if you account for the illegal population, and then you republish those maps and then mandate purposes of redistricting, it pushes political power into rural red areas, because the vast majority of these illegal populations, especially now that's pretty dangerous for America because we can't hardly be trusted.
Speaker 3:Even with our primary medical care we go to veterinarians. So you know. I mean, this is pretty scary for the Democrats.
Speaker 6:Blue states are in major cities or suburbs of major cities, so it makes it harder for Gavin Newsom and the left to write these maps, because the population the weighted population moves out from the city slightly or significantly in the case of California, so it's just harder for them to write a map that accounts for all of that that benefits them. It's it's a much harder road for them to do that and if they republish the census and then mandate reapportionment, it takes the ball out of Gavin Newsom's hand and he's sure you can go ahead and redistrict, but good luck doing that. You know they might actually end up with fewer Democrat seats if you republish the 2020 census and they still try to redistrict.
Speaker 3:So if you read in response to.
Speaker 3:Texas doing their redistricting, which they've completely screwed the pooch on that thing. They've let those Democrats be up in Illinois. They're not going to get them. They're making threats, not following through there. Whatever, we're going to gain like five seats in Texas when, it's all said and done, should have gained nine, ok, but it's. There's a uniparty problem in Texas. But you know, trump's rigging the election. You guys have rigged how many elections now in a row? You're dead to rights, man. You're dead to rights. In an ultimate act of projection, gavin Newsom will become the avatar of Democrat stupidity. He is going to embody Obama and Biden and Clinton and he just has a fancier face. But he is, he is. He represents nothing as a human being. He is, he represents nothing. He has spent a life in politics.
Speaker 3:He's a shell I listened to him on the sean ryan show. The guy can talk, but he's all a shell. Too many f words, too many this. Why? Because he's trying to look tough. Why? Because he's not tough? Because people who are tough don't have to act that way. They either are that way or they're not. But there's, there's, they're authentic, gavin's not authentic. But he's saying there, that's a panicked man. Oh, they top down, they. They meant to do this and, and you know what I mean, how many times have you rubbed trump's nose in something? I got a hat in the mail. I got a hat in the mail. I got a hat in the mail. Do you know how serious these people are? You know, and meanwhile, you know, speaking of rigging elections, this is Donald Trump, yesterday signing a executive order that dealt with both illegal immigrants and people over 120 years old on Social Security Benefits.
Speaker 19:We've already kicked nearly 275,000 illegal aliens off of the Social Security system. These are people, many of them have already left the country, and yet we were sending them checks all the time. And 275,000, and that number is now even larger than that. Frank, it's an unbelievable job, and what that's doing is making the system uh strong.
Speaker 3:It's making it strong benefits we've already is with people that are on medicaid 225 000 illegal immigrants. I would suspect they're using 100 of their benefits, yeah, whereas normal americans a lot of people have medicaid. Don't use it. They're on it, but they're. They're healthy. But if you're an illegal immigrant and you're on it, you're probably using it for primary health care purposes. You know what I mean. So that might be a significant boon and there's probably more people. Jesse Waters talked about another scandal that happened over at USAID dealing with Kamala Harris and being the border czar. This is pretty interesting.
Speaker 23:That hombre in the third world knows we're not spread eagle anymore. They love Joe and his borders are Kamala. She was never really interested in building a wall, she just wanted to find root causes.
Speaker 22:We want to work with you to address both the acute causes as well as the root causes. We are focused on addressing both the acute factors and the root causes, not only the root causes but the acute causes. To look at the root causes and the acute causes, my trip to Guatemala and Mexico was about addressing the root causes, addressing the root causes of irregular migration.
Speaker 23:For the past three years, I have led our administration's efforts to address the root causes of migration and we're learning now that she did what Joe did and tried to pass that work off onto someone else, using USAID. They wrote up a contract worth up to eight hundred million dollars for consultants to find the root causes for them. To find the root causes for them. But here's the problem. Walter Barnes III, the man who founded one of these companies that got the cash, was a known con man. He just pled guilty to a decade-long USAID bribery scheme and the government knew he was shady for years, even before they gave him all the money.
Speaker 23:In 2023, the USAID inspector general said Barnes lacked honesty and integrity, but on the same day he was awarded an $800 million contract. They had good reason to be suspicious. Over the years, Barnes secured big money deals by bribing USAID employee with pricey basketball suites, a trip to the vineyard and even a down payment on a house. Isn't that nice? And once he got paid, Barnes burned through pallets of cash doing everything, but what we paid him to do we reached out to. Walter never got back to us.
Speaker 3:We reached out to Walter, never got back to us. So meanwhile, while they're getting to the root causes, they're just dumping $800 million on the sky. Holy almost a billion dollars to research the cause of root migration. It's called an open border.
Speaker 4:There's something about that number 800 million, you know it just kind of rings nice, isn't that the same number they gave to that other chick?
Speaker 3:usa id uh stacy abrams yes same damn number, I think it was more.
Speaker 3:I think hers was like a billion or something. Oh, that's right, it was. 1.8 is 1.8. Yeah, that's right. What I find? It's almost a billion dollars. What I find it. I just keep thinking of that asian comedian where he's like this is so big. Every where we look, you guys are deburring money, stealing money, covering up crimes. I lack the vocabulary. One of the things that, for me personally, is a little bit disturbing is seeing the federalized police force walking around the country. It bugs me a little bit. This is a video that dan scavino put out my eyes so cold.
Speaker 9:I think I'm done with ice birds. If I leave her, she gonna be done with life. Okay, I put it up with no knife, because I bring guns to fights. They got this sack, I got this sack, but ain't no one to mine my little one. I say I'm like I don't even like to mine. All right, I look like without all this money, I look like how I'm coming. Yeah, I look like without all this money, I look like having all these.
Speaker 3:When I crack a smile. That's real. What? That's real. That was posted by dan scavino, or no? It was posted by dhsgov, who posted originally dude, these are hilarious. America needs you. They're. It's such a propaganda page. Oh geez, it's such a yeah, see here, look at these. Got the videos. Fancy. Again, they're making it cool.
Speaker 17:We're bringing sexy back.
Speaker 8:Oh, this is the governor and many of our other elected officials were having a press conference here to talk about redistricting and they decided they were going to come and come their nose in front of the governor's face. Why would you do that? That is unbelievably disrespectful. It's a provocative act. They're talking about disorder in Los Angeles and they are the source of the disorder in los angeles right now.
Speaker 3:This is just completely oh yeah yeah, okay I know, like I'm not like praising cops every day. Okay, I mean, I've been in prison like I I know what side of the tracks that they put me on you know what I mean like I'm an outlaw end story.
Speaker 3:So I don't. I don't seek comfort in the police now doing my dirty work, because the same police these aren't new federal employees. These are the same people that raided my friend's houses and transported me to prison Right and all of a sudden, oh now they're the good guys because Trump's their boss. Yeah, I don't buy it. I don't buy it, okay, I don't buy it. The same power that they're putting on the streets today to go after illegals could be coming after mormons next year. It's that there's no emergency breaks for these people. The best thing you can do is take the power from them.
Speaker 3:I would rather they not have uzis when they're patrolling the streets. You know what I'm saying. Like I would prefer they not have heavily armored vehicles in residential neighborhoods. But you forced our hands. You machiavellians right. You created such a crisis by letting 20, 30, 40 million who knows? Illegals across the border that at this point I'm like battle rattle round them up. Medical care is too expensive, housing's too much, food prices are too high, my schools aren't safe. I mean, these people have no political agenda other than just getting theirs round them up and then, when they're all rounded up, we're going to live in a world where it's like show me your papers. You know, that's right. You can't win, you can't, you can't win.
Speaker 3:You can't win, you can't. Well, let's check the chats here. So we got Joe Moore. Joe, welcome over to. The District of Columbia is already a federal zone. It's been. The district has been federal since 1801. And it was the act of 1871 created the District of Columbia as a corporation. It actually used to just be called the City of Washington. Yeah, washington. I have a feeling they've got something up their sleeve for him to run again. Yeah, it'd be interesting. Uh, joe moore, everybody don't forget, we still need a couple chatters over on rumble. We're not, we're like not to our goal of chatters every month. So, youtube, you guys are on fire today it's like a chat game.
Speaker 3:Yeah, you guys are definitely in it there. I love, love that. But don't forget at some point. At least one time this month, go over to Rumble and chat so we get credit for you. Okay, moving on to some financial topics, this is Scott Bessant talking about tariffs and how they're just exceeding expectations, which is kind of interesting. I'm going to show you a couple things today.
Speaker 5:The president's tariff plan brought in more than $28 billion in July, a fresh monthly high Tariffs are becoming the third largest source of income for government, and the last time you were with me, you told me that you would expect $300 billion in tariff revenue. But I think you are increasing that expectation right now, aren't you?
Speaker 16:I am. So I think August September is going to be a very good test. I've been saying that I think we can take in 300 billion and, as the Treasury Secretary, I like to be conservative, but there is a chance that I'm going to have to substantially upgrade that number. And, maria, the way to think about it for your viewers is every $300 billion is 1% of GDP. We were left with a mess. The deficit to GDP 6.5, 6.7%, highest when we were not in a recession, not at war. So just the tariff revenue can bring that down into the fives, which fits with this administration's plan of getting the deficit to GDP back into the threes, the long-term average before President Trump leaves office.
Speaker 3:So I think that's excellent, sounds good, but then this little report came out today that made me not smile so much. This is the current federal, the current federal debt and deficit. So a couple of weeks ago we reported how there was a surplus. We actually had a budget surplus for the first time in forever. Well, that didn't last very long, as you can see, they've been running big deficits 291 billion federal budget deficit in year 2025. Federal deficit for 2024. So we're actually outpacing Joe Biden's spending in 2024. No bueno, $1.6 trillion deficit so far this year, as opposed to last year, $1.5 trillion. So yeah, apparently that big, beautiful bill wasn't all that beautiful. I don't know. I mean people who participate in the 1776 live side of things. You know my opinion on money. To me, this is just like nonsense. Anyways, sapphire Patriot says Taylor, my latest shared video shows both sides of immigration raids Very interesting. And it says message redacted. You've been censored. Unless you redacted that, or is it your video on your channel? I'll have to go check it out.
Speaker 16:So another thing Scott Bessant was pushing yesterday, which I think I think would be a good addition to the rules and criminal statutes Going against senators and represent I am going to start pushing for its single stock trading ban, because it is the credibility of the House and the Senate that you look at some of these eye popping returns whether it's Representative Pelosi, senator Wyden every hedge fund would be jealous of them and the American people deserve better than this. People, people, people don't. Shouldn't come to Washington to get rich. They should come to serve the American people. And it brings down trust in the system, because I can tell you that if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door 100%.
Speaker 3:You don't go to Washington to get rich. You go to New York, you go to LA to chase your dreams and you go to Kansas to eat corn. Everybody knows this. I think that's pretty good. Uh, donald trump was. We're just kind of blowing through videos today. It's kind of fun. Donald trump was talking about dropping the national or the interest rate, and his reasoning's pretty.
Speaker 19:So they've got a long way to go and I think it's just grossly incompetent, but not quite as incompetent as his decision not to do interest rates. Take down interest rates because, just like they shouldn't have taken, think of that $360 billion for one point and we should be down at 1% because we're the leader of the world. We were always the lowest interest rate until like a certain time ago decade couple but we were always because we were the United States of America. So even if the country was run badly, we were considered like to be super prime. And now he's got us in a bad place. So we're paying $360 billion a year for each point. Now I believe we should be three or four points lower. So that's over a trillion dollars we pay every year in interest, and it's really just a paper calculation.
Speaker 3:You hear that Are you hearing this wrong?
Speaker 4:He sounds like you. It's just a paper calculation.
Speaker 3:Dude, I want to replay this. This is like, ladies and gentlemen money is not real. Okay, it is not real. What you think is money is not real or four points lower.
Speaker 19:So that's over a trillion dollars. We pay every year in interest and it's really just a paper calculation. You sign a document and you save almost a trillion dollars because that number equates very much to the bonds that we have to buy. But despite that we're powering through it and we have the greatest economy maybe we've ever had. But the housing sector people aren't able to get good mortgages. They're paying too much because of Jerome too late pal. He's truly incompetent and we'll be making another. We put a very good man in temporarily in the one spot because one of the people that was uh appointed by the democrats left early, and I heard left because that person uh wanted lower interest rates and heard quit. But I have no idea. I'm sure she won't say that it's just a paper calculation.
Speaker 4:I want to save a trillion dollars. Can you flip the switch? It's just a paper.
Speaker 3:Can you flip the switch? It's just a paper calculation. Can I flip the switch? It's just a paper calculation. Can you sign it? I'd be happy to Thank you.
Speaker 4:I'd be happy to sign it, I want to save a trillion dollars. It's a paper calculation.
Speaker 3:There's no money. It's a freaking fraud. The whole thing's a joke. Look over there, creature from Jek. I mean it's not the best written, but I mean it'll make your skin crawl off. It's not real. What are we doing here? We're chasing nothing. Oh man, let's see, check the check the chats again. Oh, nothing new. Ok, so I, I almost, I almost don't want to. Well, let's just do this, let's OK. So Scott B besant posted this he goes bitcoin.
Speaker 3:Bitcoin that has been final, finally forfeited, so it doesn't have any more appeals to the federal government will be the foundation of a strategic bitcoin reserve that president trump established in his march executive order. In addition, treasury is committed to exploring budget neutral pathways to acquire more bitcoin, to expand the reserve and to execute on the president's promise to make the united states the bitcoin superpower of the world. Get your Bitcoin now, boys and girls. Get your Bitcoin now. These guys are gobbling up. There's a limited supply of Bitcoin. It'll max out at 21 million. Those are the chess boards of the future, chess boards that the game will be played in the future. Get your Bitcoin now, definitely OK. So let's do this, let's, let's jump over. Oh, we're gonna, we're gonna do this and then we're gonna jump over to private. Okay, so this is president trump drops a bombshell directing the department of justice to investigate act blue. Meanwhile, president trump is directing the Department of Justice to investigate.
Speaker 2:Act Blue. Meanwhile, president Trump is directing the Justice Department to investigate Act Blue. This is a Democratic donation platform and the focus, as the allegations about a illegal straw, donors and foreign contributions, mark Meredith is live in Washington with more. This has been brewing for a while, mark. What do we need to know?
Speaker 13:Dana for years. You're right about this, but this is a big development. The White House is directing the attorney general to investigate the Democratic Party's top fundraising platform. It's called ActBlue and the president says he wants to know if foreign money is being donated to the group and then utilized to sway elections. Democrats are calling this probe a dangerous abuse of power. Actblue is an enormous operation in Democratic politics. It's raised more than $16 billion since 2004. You may have seen the text pop up from candidates saying please donate, go to the ActBlue website. Republicans use something similar called WinRed. There was a new memo signed on Thursday directing the Attorney General to investigate if foreign nationals are using the ActBlue platform to bypass campaign finance laws.
Speaker 3:Trump wants a report out in six months oh, looks like we're gonna have to go check out, uh, enrique antario's. Enrique antario's uh web page or page. Look at it here real quick what's going on?
Speaker 4:okay, let's see here, enrique should we go ahead and go private while we're doing that?
Speaker 3:no, let's play this one for the public. This is public consumption here, says he posted a video of one of them, um you're gonna have to bend your statements.
Speaker 25:Help us frame this here we go they're like you can't outright lie, but you're gonna have to bend your statements. Help us frame this story.
Speaker 25:We're not using plan this was a j6 to me, 25 years. The weight of the federal government on your shoulders is a pretty big threat. Those guys are my friends, that you know. They pressed me to turn on. I loved them. Those guys ran us into those charges that they got.
Speaker 25:First of all, they didn't raid my home. It was my girlfriend's home, which I had a separate residence, but I guess they had surveilled me going there, so that's why they raided that house. They followed me to work and I was sitting there waiting to have a meeting and all of a sudden I got a knock on the door. A masked man with a SWAT vest on or whatever, came up, popped open my door and snatched my phone out of my hand. They grabbed me out, put me in the back of a black pickup truck. They're like well, this is about January 6th and I had been stabbed about three weeks before that. I was at home on the day of January 6th in bed on pain pills and had 150 staples in my body. They let me go that day.
Speaker 25:They continued the raid at my girlfriend's house and they, you know, they had her and my 80 year old father outside for, I think, 14 or 15 hours in the rain and the cold. They told me I couldn't go back to the house. They said don't go back there. They took my phone. I went to my mom's, grabbed another phone and went to my house. So their warrant was only for electronics.
Speaker 25:I went home and then I immediately found an attorney. I went and met with him and he arranged a proffer. Basically, they said that anything I said couldn't, I couldn't. Anything I said in there couldn't be used against me. I couldn't be charged with anything. The second proffer I went to. I went there wholeheartedly expecting that if I told them the truth this is what's what happened that they would be like oh well, you guys didn't plan anything. They were pressing pretty hard, saying that they knew that it was planned. Nicole Miller brought out the 1776 document and told me that Enrique had wrote it and the way she presented it it looked pretty damning. Come to find out later he did. He had nothing to do with writing it, but she said it was in his possession. It was. You know he had it. Shortly after that the first proffer concluded and they said 1776 was written by the feds and then distributed.
Speaker 3:So Enrique had it in his email inbox or on his telegram channel, but he didn't write it. Somebody posted it.
Speaker 25:They would let me know if they wanted to talk to me again. I spoke with my attorney a couple of times in between then and the next proffer and he was basically like they want you to play ball or they're going to try to charge you with something serious. The second proffer they cut short 30 minutes. Maybe I don't think it was going the way they wanted it to go. Then they reached out to my attorney again and kind of let him know hey, this is what's going on. These guys are dealing with big charges right now Because I think Enrique at that point had bumped his charges to seditious conspiracy or something like that. My attorney and the fbi agents basically started showing me what the sentencing guidelines were for that and then I believe it was the third proffer is when they told me what the charges were going to be. They were the gun charges and seditious conspiracy. So all along they were playing it along like we're not going to charge you, we just need you to help us frame the story this way. That's when they put the pressure on. We're like, hey, you're either going to play ball or you know you're looking at 25 years. They they're like you can't outright lie and tell me that something happened that didn't happen. But you know you're going to have to bend your statements, basically help us frame this story the way it needs to be framed. And they said that without saying that directly to me. It was kind of communicated through my attorneys like hey, you know we're not using these words for this. You know we're not using plan, we're using goal. These were the things that were communicated to me, with the things that I had to say I would give an answer and then they would ask the question in a different way and be like, okay, well, what if I ask you this? Basically, yes, I had to frame my answers to help build the story.
Speaker 25:After the charges and after I had to take my plea deal, I flew to DC to the prosecutor's office. They flew me up there. They met me in person. I had everybody there Jocelyn Ballantyne was there, jason McCullough was there. I mean, the whole room was full of people. When I flew up there that was one of the coaching sessions there was they practiced cross-examining me. They'd send feedback to my attorney, like, hey, this was said, but this is not what we want, so we need to mold him to say it this way, that was pretty coached.
Speaker 25:You know, if I had gone out and committed a crime, if you say these guys got and I got together and we went and robbed a bank, we got caught, I'd be like, okay, you know what I did a crime you got the right to come down on me. We didn't do a crime, I didn't do anything. Look what they did to Enrique. You know, 22 years and he wasn't even at the Capitol, you know. And so that just proves that they were not just threatening, they were going to do it. You know, those guys are my friends that they pressed me to turn on. I love them, and watching them get convicted and sentenced to these outrageous sentences for things that they didn't do broke my heart, broke America's heart that was standing by and watching and I hope that maybe we can bring some change to the way the legal system works. But yeah, those guys ran innocent of those charges that they got.
Speaker 4:Are those dudes still in jail?
Speaker 3:No, but they did not get pardoned. Enrique did, but the rest of that list did not get pardoned. They got commuted. Well, that was a last-minute ad. I hadn't watched that prior, so we all watched it together, live. But basically the guy turned on his friends. It's tough in the streets. I just got stabbed.
Speaker 3:But you know, yeah, no, I'll say it the way you want me to say it Nothing gets under my skin more than that man. It just all you have is your name and all you have is your integrity, and nobody will judge you but your maker. That's it. I. I just I cannot wrap my head around this life being it and I just can't move into the next life being like I just I couldn't do it, like I didn't even. I didn't even play ball with these guys with regards to myself, let alone with regards to co-defendants or you know, I don't know, I just people.
Speaker 3:The thing that I never can quite wrap my head around was when people now, in an act of braggadocio, who have become famous because of January six, took plea deals and now they say I was coerced into a lie in signing a plea deal. That was a lie. You signed a lie and you knew it was a lie when you signed it. That is not what someone who would say wish that I had one life to give for my country as he's going to the gallows would do. Stand up, you stood up on January 6th. You're all tough then, but but all of a sudden, when it's paperwork and you can't tell the truth, tell the truth at all costs. Our whole society depends on it. The future depends on it. Everything depends on the truth coming forward. If two plus two is not four, we cannot survive as a species. We may as well just revert back to warlordism. Might makes right every time and I that. It's one of those things I will never. I just don't have it in me. It's not a matter of compromise. Compromise is one thing, lying is another. Signing a lie is another. Getting up in a frudge and saying I understand, I understand, I understand, over and over and over again, as they, multiple times, are trying to confirm that what you are now telling me is a lie was accurate and truthful and a non-perjurious, sworn statement at that time. It's just it. I don't understand it, man. I, I don't have the dna in me. I can't the individuals, and I'm always very careful not to call out J6ers. But if you took a plea deal, shut the fuck up about oh, I was coerced to lie. You knew you were lying when you did it. You get no clout for having done it. Shut up, own it. Don't say, oh, they coerced me, you did it. You get no clout for having done it. Shut up, own it. Don't say oh, they coerced me, you did it. You had party to that. Some of us didn't do that. Some of us went through trial. Some of us could have gotten a lot better benefit and a lot less time. I had five kids at home. You think I wasn't tempted. The truth is I never really was. But it cost me and my family and we were going to pay the cost because all I have is my name and my integrity and my standing before my maker. That's all I have. It doesn't.
Speaker 3:When I was in DC they had a show that we could watch. That was about those Salem witch trials and I can't remember the guy's name, but it was the first guy that said if you sign on this paper that say you're a witch, we won't burn you and we won't kill your family, and he's like you know, you can just live off your life. But you got to sign a paper saying so-and-so's a witch and you're a witch too, and he's like I didn't. And and this is like after a year that they kept him in a dungeon and he's basically they're about to hang him. They're like here's the paper you can go free to sign it. Say you're a witch and he's like I have but a name. I can't give my children this name and know that I lied and gave away my integrity and told you I was a witch. You know he's like that. That would be starting my children off with a bad name, right, and that with a bad name, right, and that's.
Speaker 3:I watched that video as I can't believe they're letting people in prison watch this. I'm like this is the whole point. And in the end of the video it's like they hung him and then they hung like two other people and then they didn't hang any more. People put an end to the sandwich trials. You know why? Because he got up and he said just that. He said I'm innocent, I didn't do it, so hang me.
Speaker 3:And they hung him and the community went oh, everyone else that you've hung or punished. They like signed a thing saying that they were witches or you know what I mean like it created but he just wouldn't bend. And it it ended the fever of the salem witch trials. And that's how I felt, like if every single j6 defendant just said no, I'm just going to trial, I'm not going to say a word, you just put me through trial and you got to impanel a grand jury. You got to impanel a jury and you're gonna have to go through the whole thing. It would have broke the system. They were to the point to where, as a person took a plea deal, they indicted a new person. How would you, how would you feel if you're like, hey, you could play for time and uh, maybe someone else can stay free?
Speaker 4:they really needed everybody to take plea deals so they could process everybody and get them in jail. Otherwise they wouldn't be able to process everybody.
Speaker 3:Yes, I'm very careful. I don't like. Everybody's got their own journey. Everybody's got to do their own thing. The pressure was immense, but don't go clout seeking. If you bent at that moment, you are not someone I want to lean on. And I love some of these people I mean, these are some bosom buddies but I have told them to their faces. And if there's other J Sixers that listen to this, if you took a plea deal and we've talked, I have probably told you this to your face because I am not ashamed to say it You're the reason why this continued to happen. That's the consent they needed. They needed your virtue to be weaponized against yourself. Right, and I just, anyways, I am. Some J sixers might hate me for having said that, but it blows me away. Some of the biggest influencers out there that use J six clout are people who took plea deals. I just I don't know. Uh, frasier said Taylor would be a pad politician. That is a good thing, right, yeah.
Speaker 3:You know it's funny. I get asked pretty frequently about going into politics and my wife and I were both like I asked somebody once if I would make a good politician.
Speaker 4:Then they said I asked somebody once if I would make a good politician. Then they said no, you should not go into politics. Well, why not? And they were, and they were. This is what they said. You're too honest. Yeah, that was it. Yeah, You'll never make it.
Speaker 3:I'll tell you what the thing I love about Donald Trump is he has metal. He also will not bend, he will not break. This is what I know, and this is all I know. And he just is not going. I mean, we can compromise on this if we want to talk tax rates and percentages and, woo-hoo you know, should we get a bond to build a park or whatever, all day long? That's politics, that's compromise, that's trying to get win-win solutions. But when we're talking about truth or falsity, you know here, sign here. Two plus two equals five. No, it doesn't, it just doesn't.
Speaker 3:I'm sorry, you know. In fact, I take my disdain so far. I refuse to participate with him in the freaking court. I didn't call witnesses, I didn't file motions, I made special appearance, the whole thing because my disdain for the entire system. It's corrupt from top to bottom. So what am I going to go Plead? I'm going to go bend down and ask forgiveness from the freaking guy in the black robe that needs help getting up out of his chair. That's been for 37 years, that sat on the FISA court during 9-11?
Speaker 3:You think I respect him? No, not at all. I respect the guy digging a septic tank. I respect the guy that's framing a house, that's working with this. You know what I mean. That's who I respect. I don't respect some guy that sits up in a freaking glorified giant cubicle in the sky, you know, four feet above you, that wears a black robe, that falls asleep during critical elements of testimony. I don't respect that stuff. Oh, but they were pressuring me. Yeah, I don't respect that stuff. Oh, but they were pressuring me. Yeah, you know what? People have gone to prison for shitty reasons for many, many times. You think we're unique? What do you think the black community's been barking about for 50 years? Take your medicine. Who is this? A trump cult channel? Couldn't tell. Should we go private?
Speaker 4:now Is this a Trump cult title? Oh, that's pretty fun.
Speaker 3:AR Random Independent. Oh, we haven't seen you in the chats before. I don't think we are I actually am relatively critical from time to time, explain yourself. Yeah, we're actually kind of telling people other things, but anyways, uh, I am not critical of donald trump. To me he's. He's a as far as politics go, I'm a populist. This the end of story. Does he make mistakes?
Speaker 4:he talks about um trump running for a third term up in the chat a little bit higher up okay, where is, where is that at there?
Speaker 3:LOL going, lol is going off this tramp. She should be able to run a third term, because I'm actually president of first term. Yes, I would agree with that. I can't.
Speaker 3:I came across that don't stoke the fire is great. We are peasants who just live free and want to be left alone, not indoctrinated by false narratives. Yeah, not, not a trump cult channel. We're just freedom lovers. We're peasants, literally like we have to live here. If trump's in office or biden's in office or obama's in office or jd vance is in office, we have to live here. We have to go to work tomorrow.
Speaker 3:So know, to the extent that there's a connection from the president's desk to my gas tank and my dinner table, I really care who the president is. Beyond that, I don't give a. What you do in your space. You know what I mean. Like, yes, libertarian peasants, I think politics is stupid. It's a necessary evil, as our founding father said.
Speaker 3:Okay, good point on Trump in court, I always wondered why he didn't walk by their special appearance under his trust. He didn't matter. Trump knowing Carlitz, I know what you're referring to. It doesn't matter if he knows it or not. You can't defeat tyranny. Tyranny is the warlord's dilemma, right? It's force on force. That's what you're dealing with here.
Speaker 3:So it's a masterful game that Trump played politically to put the pressure on them so that they couldn't railroad him. They were going to railroad him anyways, but they had to. You know he played a masterful game, but, yeah, you can't just come in there and be like you know all the bells and whistles. No, they went in and played the game, so saying you want to be left alone and not indoctrinated by false nail murders and then supporting Trump. As a contradiction, maybe, but you know, I spent years listening to Barack Obama and worked my way out of that one too. So, all right, guys, let's head on over to private and we'll get a couple of minutes in there. You guys on YouTube, I hate to see you go. You guys are so busy chatting in there today and AR random independent. Welcome to the peasants. And hopefully, over time, you do not believe that we are trump sycophants in fact we, you know. But I do owe a lot to him and he did give me a pardon, so I'm not gonna be super critical of the guy.
Speaker 4:But if you haven't been watching our show for a minute, we are we. We give donald trump plenty of side eye yeah, plenty of side.
Speaker 3:I don't like what's going on with palantir. I already in this show I mentioned. I don't like what's going on with the homeland security. Like, yeah, my gang is bigger than your gang. These are the same people that were persecuting me and my friends six months ago and now, all of a sudden, we're supposed to be like do I want illegal immigrants to go? Yeah, it just has nothing to do with donald trump. I've wanted that since obama. Yeah, when I had an illegal immigrant working for me to beat a man and I called ICE and they put him in the ICE facility in Tacoma and then they gave him a green card and I was like what the heck? So, no, I'm completely yeah, he needs more side. Yeah, no, we're.
Speaker 3:We are supportive of Trump. Like you know what's the classic line we want the president to be successful. Because we're American, of course I want Trump to be successful. I want him to vanquish his foes and enemies, absolutely Do. I want accountability and justice, but at the same time, I understand that the boot that you put on the left foot, if you put it on the right foot, it's still a boot on my neck right.
Speaker 3:I oppose government power and oppression in all of its forms and formats. And if Donald Trump does that and he is doing that to some people, right, I don't oppose, I oppose that as well. So, anyways, all, anyways, all right. Guys, we're going to get going and head on over to rumble private chat for the rumble private streaming for the last little bit, and we've got a clip that we're going to be playing from weinstein talking about covid and myocarditis. He does something terrible and it's just like, yeah, that was bad, but and it does something neutral, maybe slightly beneficial, like like his second coming of christ. I mean, there does something terrible. It's like, yeah, yeah, I mean yeah there's that, vince mcmahon.
Speaker 3:This is politics as usual. So you can't, you're not going to get perfection from them and I, and I refuse, I, I refuse to let better be the enemy of good. Sometimes, all you get is good. You're never going to get the best, you're just going to get good, especially when you're dealing with politics. And that that's how I felt about the big, beautiful bill. I don't like it. I don't like it at all. But when you talk about government spending, I'm like double middle fingers to you. You don't even know what money is you know what I mean it's just a freaking bookkeeping entry, Like it's the stupidest thing.
Speaker 3:Oh, we got to go private.
Speaker 4:We'll talk to you guys again tomorrow.
Speaker 3:Bye, are we private now? Yes, okay, we're private now. That was a good discussion over there. It's not about perfection. I'm still reading youtube chats. Not about perfection, it's moving goalpost broski. Sure they'll be back tomorrow. My mom used to say in the rumble chat, my mom used to say why do you always, uh, why do you always have to say something? My reply how can you not? You have to stand up and speak out. Do not bend the knee. That is very true. You have to spin out. Birkin burkin, be being freedom. Yes, absolutely okay. So this was pretty interesting. Before we get to eric weinstein, we're going to listen to donald trump talk about 12.4 million people that they have confirmed are over the age of 120 on Social Security 12.4 million names listed in the Social Security database that were over 120 years of age, meaning you were breaking records because I've never heard of anybody at 125.
Speaker 19:because I've never heard of anybody at 125. There were nearly 135,000 people listed who were over 160 years old and, in some cases, getting payments. So somebody's getting those payments and we're after that.
Speaker 3:Well, somebody was getting those payments 160 years old. This one came out with the Doge stuff and people didn't want to believe it and they went and confirmed it.
Speaker 4:All it really was was happening does your payment go up the older you get, or does it stay the same? I have no idea how that works.
Speaker 3:I don't either I just assume it's not going to be there for us yeah, you know what I mean of course like. I just assume we're never going to see any of it. I've had it okay. So this, this is a fascinating interview, oh boy. So this is. This is brett weinstein with pierce morgan. I don't know who this other guy is, but pierce morgan has been a huge covid person. You know, he's like pushed the mass, he's pushed the lockdowns, he's pushed, believing that the government is he's pushing all kinds of right he's he's not been like, uh, you know, stephen colbert pushed the vaccine, but pretty close, yeah.
Speaker 3:So to have Brett Weinstein on and talk about this and to have Pierce Morgan, he's beat down man. Some of these people that push the shot and got on board with the narrative and criticize all your independent libertarians and want to. You know society and you know he was one of those guys and but they've been beat.
Speaker 4:But now he's going to have one on.
Speaker 3:They've been beat down. Well, they've been beat down because every time a piece of good information comes out, it's anti-COVID, it's anti-vaccines. So, having Brett Weinstein on here and explaining exactly what was going on here, Stunning.
Speaker 20:Now I have to say that independently I've had a very, very top experienced oncologist in the UK in London one of the best in the country who's expressed exactly the same concerns to me for a long period of time about the mRNA vaccine so they weren't all mRNA, but the ones that were. He's been very concerned about that. What do you feel about that particular issue?
Speaker 24:that. What do you feel about that particular issue? Unfortunately, the mRNA platform, though it is brilliant in its conception, is fatally flawed, and although there are arguably applications where it might be useful something like the treatment of a deadly cancer it is not appropriate to vaccinate against a relatively mundane disease like COVID. The reason that it isn't is that the platform itself carries hazards at its core that at the moment we have no technological fix for. So the myocarditis and pericarditis that showed up as a result of COVID vaccinations are inherent to the platform, not to the messenger RNA that was delivered inside these shots. It would, in my opinion, be almost certain to show up, irrespective of what foreign protein was encoded by the vaccine in question, and it would be no service to the public if we were to allow vaccines that have this flaw to be deployed only to discover years later that people had been injured and died because of them years later that people had been injured and died because of them.
Speaker 20:In simple, layman's terms, is the issue with mRNA that, in an effort to provide immunity against COVID-19, it damages and reduces your general immunity in many people?
Speaker 24:No, I would say it's actually much worse than that. That's true, but the problem is that the design of this platform is to induce your own cells to make a foreign protein which gets displayed on the surface of those cells. That's as intended, but because there's no targeting mechanism to lead it to happen only in certain tissues, it can happen haphazardly around the body, including in places like your heart. And Pierce Morgan. He's just like he's.
Speaker 24:he knows he's hearing the truth here like what that triggers is your own immune system to see those foreign proteins and conclude the only thing they can, which is that those cells have been virally infected. And the right response, the response, the natural response of the body is to take virally infected cells and destroy them. So the the idea that we get myocarditis from the covid shots is really standing in for a much starker reality, which is that inflammation, myocarditis is the symptom of damage to the heart done by our own immune systems in response to the cells in the heart producing a foreign protein and triggering our immune system to attack them nod at the end by piers morgan's like oh, now I get it oh, booster up baby.
Speaker 3:Oh man I. I listened to another guy today. He was like the damage is uncalculable. He says we're just finding it everywhere. We're finding it everywhere. We're finding. Every metric is ticking up. You know, one or 2% more for this disease. One or two or 3% more for this disease. This one's off the chart 20% increase on a rare disease we'd never seen he's like it's. I mean red dye 47. I mean it's's. You know, nobody wants to admit that. It's just this instant onset of issues. And you know, same thing with the autism this instant onset of a generation of autism but it was pretty hard to ignore the soccer players falling down on pitch.
Speaker 3:But you know the video, the supercut they played. There was one guy that died before covet, so you know the whole thing was debunked.
Speaker 3:Oh, yeah, because they got one video in there that was, you know, in a wrong timeline. That's how it always is, man, that's how it always is. But I just the mrna vaccine is actually the problem itself. Like, yeah, even if the, the spike protein or whatever what they were doing with the covid side of things he says might be really effective on cancer. You know, you either die or you live and maybe end up with a little myocarditis. Okay, you know what I mean. You make you chemo, you basically kill everything and hopefully you outlast the cancer. All right, I, I get it.
Speaker 3:But to just use it for a common respiratory virus and and like we played in a video the other day, this platform that was instant. They could just scheme up an AI thing and plug it into their platform and, you know, every freaking sickness we would be getting vaccines for and boosters for. It would just be a great business model for humanity. So, all right, that's all I have for today. Thank you for joining us. We got through a lot of videos and it all connected. I mean, these guys are talking to each other and they're playing the game of politics and it affects us. So go out and enjoy your day, enjoy your life, just trust Kash Patel, but take care of yourself. We're just peasants, remember, no matter what they do or don't do we still have to live here With that? We'll talk to you guys again tomorrow.
Speaker 1:Old Woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What, I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. Well, I object to it. They automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, there is. There's some lovely filth down here, oh how do you do?
Speaker 26:How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 1:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the game. That's what it's all about. If only people.
Speaker 3:Mac carter yes, I can go to the page. Puget sound patriots picnic tomorrow. Get with me on telegram at peasants peasant pod on telegram. Get me the information if I don't have it. But mac carter 60 yes, I would like to go to that. Just get me the info. Go ahead and go back to the video all right old woman, man, man, sorry, what night.
Speaker 1:lived in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress there is. There's some lovely filth down here, oh.
Speaker 26:How do you do? How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 1:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 26:If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord?
Speaker 1:We don't have a lord. What I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 1:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then.
Speaker 1:The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
