Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
We Are The Peasants: How Trump's Battle Against The Establishment Affects Us All
The political establishment doesn't want you to understand what's really happening behind the scenes in Washington. In this eye-opening episode of The Peasant's Perspective, we pull back the curtain on Trump's groundbreaking meeting with Putin and what it truly means for peace prospects in Ukraine.
When Air Force One landed and Trump met Putin on that red carpet, the world witnessed something remarkable – American military aircraft conducting a flyby during a high-stakes diplomatic meeting. This wasn't just pageantry; it was a powerful statement about America's position in negotiations. While mainstream media obsesses over handshakes and protocol, we analyze what matters: the substantive discussions that could finally end a devastating conflict.
We examine Trump's defining MAGA speech that crystallized his movement – a clear articulation of the battle between everyday Americans and the entrenched power structures that have hollowed out our nation's prosperity. This isn't about politics as usual; it's about reclaiming control over a government that increasingly serves special interests rather than its citizens.
The hypocrisy surrounding Russia relations becomes glaringly obvious when we revisit the Clinton-Uranium One scandal. How can the same figures who facilitated Russian acquisition of American uranium resources credibly accuse others of inappropriate Russian ties?
Trump's announcement targeting mail-in voting and electronic voting machines represents a direct challenge to a system many Americans no longer trust. We explore what this means for election integrity and why this initiative faces such fierce opposition from those benefiting from the status quo.
Perhaps most revealing is our discussion with Ed Martin, who's investigating government weaponization against citizens. His revelations about ongoing criminal referrals against prominent figures signal a serious push for accountability after years of unchecked abuses of power.
Join us for this unflinching look at the forces shaping our nation's future and the battle to restore government that truly serves the people. The revolution will indeed be podcasted.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Hello, hello Scream.
Speaker 4:And when they went to the queen to tell her her subject had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.
Speaker 2:We're getting screwed man, every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants.
Speaker 2:Welcome to another episode of the Peasant's Perspective. It looks like at this moment we're streaming to ourselves. Yes, yes, we are, but we are consistent. We're doing it anyways. It must be a Monday, even if it's just for the audio listeners. All right, guys, we are happy to be here today and we have to make sure that we get 10 viewers at one moment and we're going to do ad reads. Wake up, we are going to lay out with ad reads today. We have to do so many ad reads for the month because you know we're in that Rumble Creators program and it's awesome, right.
Speaker 1:They're helping us grow the channel and everything that's okay though.
Speaker 2:I mean, I'm used to talking to myself. Uh yeah, for those of you that are listening, please share the show with others. We obviously want to grow. Oh, here we go, pony boy. Good morning peasants. You know, maybe this morning the problem was I actually had the chats open when we started the show. Usually I'm still kind of fiddling around with them, so it's good to good to have everybody here today. So, good morning pony boy. Welcome to the rumble chat. Appreciate it very much. So we had a really epic weekend this week, did?
Speaker 1:you see about it oh my goodness.
Speaker 2:So trump went and met with putin in russia was this friday yeah, it was friday, yeah, it started friday it was started friday.
Speaker 2:So there was this iconic moment when donald trump and vladimir putin are walking, they're walking across. Let me uh, oh, I'm sitting here let me change my volume, not ai, ai would have totally had the volume switched over earlier, okay. So there's this iconic moment where trump's got red carpet coming from air force one and vladimir putin comes across the red carpet and they meet together and of course, trump grabs his hand and pulls it in tight so vladimir putin gets off balance, so it's the whole dominance thing. And then, as they're walking to the red carpet, here comes a stealth bomber and, I'm guessing, four F-35s in an escort formation doing a flyby. Now you have to understand who is on this tarmac.
Speaker 2:This is Donald Trump and everything that we know. With Air Force One and F-35 escorts and clearing airspace. Russians do the same thing. Yeah, they have at least the same protocols. And Putin is a wanted man, right? He's got the whole war crime thing in that report of whatever. So technically, we're supposed to arrest him the moment he hits American soil. So the whole like thing of this, the fact that they did a flyby who knows if they asked permission? Who knows if they informed them? Who knows if russia had all their radar tech up and is like monitoring the airspace because you know their guy, who's in an active war and an active conflict, has just stepped foot on the territory of the people who are paying for this war and this conflict.
Speaker 1:I think, in the same way that they probably stood down just because of the momentum and the momentous of this event where they're meeting, they probably probably let their hair down just a little bit.
Speaker 2:See who knows, we're not.
Speaker 2:We're probably not going to know this, for a little while, right, if this was a surprise flyby, like no risk I mean, I'm sure there's no bombs in these bombers, right. But if this was a surprise flyby and the russian intelligence and military is like holy smokes. Holy smokes like they don't usually fly b2s over russia, so we don't really encounter these a lot, right? No, like holy smokes, or it was pre-staged either way, putin looks over like oh my gosh, and then, and then he gets, you know, aligned again and trump jabs him exactly.
Speaker 1:I think it's the same feeling as me watching those chinese boats hit each other for the first time. I was like whoa whoa, yeah.
Speaker 2:So here you go, here they come. Oh, oh the video. Oh, the video reaction. All right, we'll refresh it here. Give me a moment. It's a live show. Folks, we put it together as we go. As one listener said oh, even worse come off the screen.
Speaker 1:Let me find it. It's like mud your eye.
Speaker 2:It's all teed up, ready to go look at this great moment. Oh, no, we're not watching it. There's a lot of good stuff to have this weekend. We're definitely not going to be able to get to it all at all so many, I gotta take you off that screen.
Speaker 1:You're doom scrolling no, I said don't show the screen.
Speaker 2:Okay, so first thing putin did when he landed by the way, he went and laid a wreath in the world right here, so it looks that camera angle didn't catch it camera didn't angle, didn't really.
Speaker 1:There's another angle where he's like oh yeah, he's whoa.
Speaker 2:Let's see if yeah, anyways, it was pretty fun. I got tweeted out john m cameron. Shout out to him john rocks homes, one of the j6s, taylor, taylor, john, attack us at gone for months.
Speaker 2:You can find me on x at gone, that's you was charged with assault with a deadly weapon, a firearm. When you look up the firearm info, it's a bike rack. He was pushed. I wasn't pushed into a bike rack, but either way he's pushing the bikes back. There's been years in prison for it. God bless the j6ers. This was in response to the doj officials who threw a subway sandwich at federal office, charged with the 111a. I expect, seven years man, that that subway sand was just full of gmos and who knows what other kind of toxins yeah, deadly weapon, deadly weapon right, we're at eight viewers.
Speaker 2:Can you guys believe it? Listen, when we get to 10, we read an ad.
Speaker 7:So you've got to hang around for the ad.
Speaker 2:You guys are the dedicated show listeners. It's your friends. You show up every day. This is so pitiful. Eight live viewers it's so funny. We have an actually decent audience, but this is an early morning show and people catch up, so it's kind of fun. Those of you that show up every day and get your names read out in the chats You'll be here for the first ad read ever. First ad read ever.
Speaker 1:Yeah, yeah, it'll be so sad if we can't get to 10.
Speaker 2:Okay, so I saw this video. This actually came up this morning in my feed. This is an old video. It circulates anytime. Donald Trump does anything amazing.
Speaker 2:But, it's like the iconic. This is the Trump campaign. This is the MAGA movement. This is the thing that we all latched onto and said this is why we support this man. All the picadillos, all the weird tweets, all the potential drama and hoaxes surrounding this man and nightmare, it surrounding this man and nightmare it's this that ultimately gets us. You know, as one commenter said last week, the trump cult show.
Speaker 5:I don't want to be a trump cult show, but I really like this speed about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people. The Washington establishment and the financial and media corporations that fund it exist for only one reason to protect and enrich itself. The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interest they partner with. These people that don't have your good in mind, our campaign represents a true existential threat like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government.
Speaker 5:The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals. For our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, china and other countries all around the world. It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities. This is a struggle for the survival of our nation, and this will be our last chance to save it.
Speaker 5:This election will determine whether we're a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests. Rigging the system, and our system is rigged. This is reality. You know itged. This is reality. You know it, they know it, I know it and pretty much the whole world knows it.
Speaker 2:Dude do you remember when this speech came out? No, oh, my goodness, this is. This is the maggot movement right here, like this speech to finally goes on for a couple more minutes. But that's the big thing. This is an existential threat. Bankers and special interests, the Clinton cash machine he just like boom, boom, boom, boom, boom and this is why we're doing it. I knew this day would come.
Speaker 1:I agreed with everything you said. I just I've never seen it before, oh my goodness, yeah, it's a good one here.
Speaker 5:We'll listen to a couple more minutes of it. The Clinton machine is at the center of this power stunt. We've seen this firsthand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors. Honestly, she should be locked up. The most powerful weapon deployed by the Clintons is the corporate media, the press. Let's be clear on one thing the corporate media in our country is no longer involved in journalism. They're a political special interest no different than any lobbyist or other financial entity with a total political agenda. And the agenda is not for you, it's for themselves and he's dude, he's ripping over.
Speaker 2:All right, ron, I see 10.
Speaker 1:I see 10 in the I know I'm on there, I'm trying to figure out how to make it work, all All right. Well, we'll figure it out.
Speaker 2:We'll figure it out. Those of you that are on YouTube welcome. Welcome, tiffany and Carlito Carlitz on Rumble. Tiffany and Carlito on YouTube. Welcome, sapphire Patriot, good to have you today. And, of course, john Attacus and Farazier speech. He's like coming after the clint. Honestly, she should be locked up.
Speaker 5:Okay, then he continues the one who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe. They will lie, lie, lie and then again they will do worse than that. They will do whatever is necessary. The Clintons are criminals. Remember that. This is well documented, and the establishment that protects them has engaged in a massive cover-up of widespread criminal activity at the State Department and the Clinton Foundation in order to keep the Clintons. They knew they would throw every lie they could have made at my family and my loved ones. They knew they would stop at nothing to try to stop them. Nevertheless, I take all of these slings and arrows gladly for you. I take them for our movement, so that we can have our country back.
Speaker 5:I knew this day would arrive. It's only a question of when, and I knew the American people would rise above it and vote for the future they deserve. The only thing that can stop this corrupt machine is you. The only force strong enough to save our country is us. The only people brave enough to vote out this corrupt establishment is you, the American people. Our great civilization has come upon a moment of reckoning.
Speaker 5:I didn't need to do this. I built a great company and I had a wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the fruits and benefits of years of successful business deals and businesses for myself and my family, instead of going through this absolute horror show of lies, deceptions, malicious attacks. Who would have thought? I'm doing it because this country has given me so much? It because this country has given me so much and I feel so strongly that it's my turn to give back to the country that I love. I'm doing this for the people and for the movement and we will take back this country for you and we will make america great again so some people say that's the speech that won him the presidency.
Speaker 2:Oh amen, I'll tell you what. If there's an argument to be made that he inoculated his followers from everything that was going to happen for the next 10 years, that was it. He basically laid it out. We're still dealing with the same corrupt machine trying to cover up for the Clintons. All right, did we figure out? I think so. You want me to read an ad? All right, guys. This is it Big moment. This is a big moment for the show. This is our first ad. Read who is the first ad.
Speaker 1:Oh well, let's just find out If you haven't already. Make sure you download the Rumble app. It's free, simple to use and the best way to stay connected to the content you want. Once you've got it, search for my channel and hit follow. That way, you'll get a notification every time you go live. No missed shows, no extra steps. You can have it right now using the link in the description or the pinned live chat. Download it to your phone and you're ready to go. And, if you prefer, watching it on the big screen, rumble is available on all major streaming devices and smart TVs. Just search for Rumble, follow the channel and be part of the action.
Speaker 2:Oh, my goodness, I almost teared up right there. Rumble is amazing. We're fighting the man. The revolution will be podcasted. And here we are just yes, rubble premium, everybody go get. It's wonderful. Yes, rubble's actually been really good to us, right? I think they've been really good to us. Uh, when we first started going, if we were streaming on youtube, oh my goodness, we wouldn't have lasted hardly an episode, and you can actually find the old episodes back from 2020 and 2021 okay, here's how it works.
Speaker 1:You can, as soon as we finish an ad, it gives me a timer before I can do another ad.
Speaker 2:Okay, so we've got like 20 minutes everybody's got to stick around, then we only have to do five of these this month. So if we can get them all done today and tomorrow, we're good, we'll be here till midnight, we'll get all five out.
Speaker 2:We'll just rock and roll. Okay, thank you guys. So much, all right. So back to this video with locker up, right, he? This is the, the video that the speech that trump gave, that a lot of people say, really solidified the mega movement. That describes the mega movement. This is about the people taking back the power from the banks, the corrupt politicians, the special interests, the NGOs. He, george Soros, he kind of rattles off all of them.
Speaker 2:And when he talks about the Clintons being criminals, I mean everybody's got a string to pull on that thread. I mean there's a dozen ways you can look at and go, oh, they're criminals, yep. Well, here was a big one that was had kind of been occurring, and this is one that most Americans are not aware of, and that's the issue with Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation and a company called Uranium One, which was a Canadian mining company that had interests in American uranium. They ended up selling that to Russia. What?
Speaker 1:Yes.
Speaker 2:Yes, who's a russian asset now? Yes, exactly so. In the ongoing theme of they paint trump with the sins of the democrats, this is again why, right? Why would you sell something to your mortal enemy? You're the double agent.
Speaker 15:Well, let's accuse our political rival for congressional investigators did hillary clinton give 20 percent of the united states supply of uranium to russia for donations to the clinton foundation, and it flows out of the sale in 2010 of this company, uranium one, which controlled about a fifth of america's uranium, to a russian firm called rosatom. By law, even though Uranium One was a Canadian firm, the US part of this deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which is comprised of nine agencies, including the State Department, and at that time, hillary Clinton was the boss there, anderson. So I mean, a lot of this was looked at during the campaign. Why is it coming up back now again? I mean, there were also all the donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Speaker 15:Yeah, absolutely, we've all talked about it before, but the Hill newspaper, which reports on a lot of things with the government here, came out with a report showing the FBI was investigating a subsidiary of Rosatom for possible racketeering, money laundering, bribes, all aimed at giving the Russian government more influence over the US nuclear industry while this deal was being approved. So some members of Congress want to know why they weren't told about all of this. And furthermore, the Hill says the Russians were channeling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, at the same time raising the question to the Clinton Foundation, at the same time raising the question, especially for some Republicans did Hillary Clinton help this deal along in any fashion?
Speaker 1:Oh, I don't know. What do you think? I don't know, I have no idea.
Speaker 2:I don't know. I wonder what WikiLeaks has to say about it.
Speaker 1:Oh, that's all half. You can't trust that stuff. I wonder how Nancy Pelosi's husband makes her decisions. I have no idea, geez, I don't know. All right, and then anderson cooper. Well, I wonder why this is coming out now. It's like because you never covered it when you should have.
Speaker 2:Dummy you know none investigate dense. That's why. All right, so I was getting the circle of death on this next video, so I had to refresh it. Now I have to go find it back in the course. Find it here, okay, so this is a couple, a couple of different clips from the meeting with between Putin and Trump. Oh man, it's like. It's like the deep state doesn't want us to see it, or something. Man, what is going on here here? This is crazy. Literally, these clips will not play. Oh no, that's not. That sometimes does happen, but usually a quick refresh will fix that problem. No issues, but for some reason, not these ones all right.
Speaker 2:Well, clandestine says this there's no way to describe today other than an absolute victory for trump. Putin confirmed there would be no escalation if trump was potus in the last four years. Today trump proved he is far superior than biden and the dems, and there's no denying it. Yeah, so at one point putin does say he goes. You know, I have to say what he says about the. We wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if he was respected. I can confirm positive, that is true, it's like. So, of course, you know some of the critics are like see, see, they're friends, they're friends, whatever.
Speaker 2:So then there was another one. When Trump was talking, he brought up the Russiagate hoax and basically said we've had poor relations because the Russiagate hoax has made it almost impossible for me to do anything with Russia, because you're always accused of being a friend or too weak or whatever the slander of the day is. So can't play these videos. They are not happening, so we'll just move on. I saw this too. This is again. We dodged a bullet, ladies and gentlemen. Oh, imagine if this was our president. Just imagine.
Speaker 3:And we're going to actually listen to what she says they're cheating they're, they want to change the current system to make it bend toward the outcome they want. And so, you know, if you believe the public reporting, they get a call that says, hey, redo your lines, even though the fallout is going to include exactly what you said, which is, you know, taking the franchise, the vote, away from specific communities and, in the case of Texas, away from specific communities and, in the case of Texas, latino and black voters yeah, and diluting their votes. Oh, and this is not a census year, yeah, but this is a year with the big, beautiful bill and the unpopularity of it. And so they want to bend the rules. And I, and I have to say that you know those texas, those texan legislators, this is real good for them. You know that. Here's how I think about it. I think you're right in terms of the effect.
Speaker 2:Okay so, oh, gag, so they want to cheat, they want oh, those guys are such cheaters the outcome that they want. And meanwhile new york times on friday runs this headline oh, new york times, opinion, interesting times. Abolish the senate and the electoral college and pack the court. Why the left can't win't a new thing both parties gerrymander like let's just be realistic about it. It's annoying for us as constituents but, you know, for the life of the political party it's like their whole purpose. So they've been gerrymandering for years. The republicans are just they.
Speaker 2:There's a section in the history books about it yeah, the republicans have their virtue weaponized very much like, well, don't do it, it's not going to be fair. They're like, okay, we won't do it. And then when democrats are doing it and republicans are like it's not fair, they're like, well, to the victors go the spoils, and that's fair. You know, oh, whoops, you kind of scary mandering again when the democrats are in the minority, like the minority's supposed to have a vote, yeah, so how else are we supposed to get our say?
Speaker 2:so again, in a classical sense of projection, here they are projecting onto the republicans. Oh, when they they cheat to get their way, they'll change the rules. You're talking about getting rid of a constitution and giving up with a new one, abolishing the Senate. I mean, we've gone way past abolishing the filibuster. You're abolishing the Senate.
Speaker 1:Right and I like the open pack. The court statement.
Speaker 2:And notice as a theme here, the Democrats want demagoguery. They want that majority, that true democracy. You know why? Because they're good at psyops, they're good at persuasion, they're good at manipulation, they're good at controlling the media. You live in a Truman show. They know that they control everything. They don't control reality, but they control your perception of it.
Speaker 1:And yesterday it was making me feel a little bit like a slave. I was to be honest. Why is that? It just felt like our entire system is built and designed to keep us constrained in some way. And as I'm feeding the chickens, I'm like, hmm, I guess I'm just in a really big chicken called America. That's what it felt like for a second yeah, yeah, do you remember this?
Speaker 2:this was in minnesota, tim waltz was governor and they deployed the national guard along with the police forces to enforce a lockdown. This was over covet, okay. So when they talk about trump being a totalitarian and he's actually going after criminals, people that have committed alleged crimes that are going to then go to trial and or be administratively processed through deportation or something like that like they're actually going after real criminals well, I mean, here's that same power, that same tool that trump's using that same tool, those same executive orders was be was used by tim waltz to do this in Minnesota.
Speaker 15:Look, at this. They just keep coming. Oh, oh, oh, it's time Get inside.
Speaker 10:Get inside, get inside, get in your hood, let's go get in, get in, get in, get in, get in, get in what's that all about?
Speaker 2:whatever that was. Yeah, this really happened, like that was a real story. It's back, by the way, in the archives. We covered this in real time, yeah, so you know, like you know, trump's an authoritarian. Yeah, well, he's going after criminals. You were, you were shooting people to get back inside their houses.
Speaker 1:Yeah, you were just shooting at us there's troops on the street.
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah, our troops. The whole genesis of the show was looking at that being like this is unacceptable. Yeah, for real, this is unacceptable. Uh, the democrats were like no, this is totally fine, you guys are criminals.
Speaker 1:It's like yeah, this is like having the brown shirts come through your neighborhood.
Speaker 2:That's exactly the way we compared it. I mean it was like I don't know, I don't have another, there's nothing else to you wouldn't do this if there was what else would you compare it to? You know, if there was a, if there was a tornado coming, you wouldn't deploy the national garden. Tell me to you know like. This is how this works like if there's a pandemic and people are dying, I'll stay off the streets myself, yeah.
Speaker 1:You don't need somebody to tell me.
Speaker 2:No convincing necessary. You know what I mean. Okay, so here, kristen, I think this Kristen Welker yeah, kristen Welker is talking to Marco Rubio about the negotiations and everything that was going on, and Marco Rubio, I'll tell you what you, what he and jd vance are just nailing it on the messaging and standing their ground and defending their positions, nailing it. So we're going to listen to a couple of these clips, because they made the sunday morning shows. You know, sunday kind of sets the tone for the week. So as I was watching this come out, I was like, okay, I can tell what, where this this week is going to head. The democrats and the left have nothing here.
Speaker 2:Trump has done a good enough job explaining that the war in ukraine is about death okay so they know, if they kind of come at this a little bit too pro, let's continue the thing and we need to fund ukraine. That the what are you supporting? Continuing death? It's an unwinnable war encounter, right. So they're they're like kind of careful about that. But then so they play a little bit with the geopolitics. Well, are you? Are we capitulating to putin?
Speaker 2:When I was in debate in high school, we would have topics like school vouchers or we would have topics I can't remember there's some other environmental topic we had at the time we had. The way policy debate works is there's like four or five topics that everybody picks for offense and then you develop your defense around these four or five topics. So when you get up in a debate competition, the people pull out and they're going to talk about school vouchers. So you're like, okay, I know the topic. Now they get to format their line of attack on why they want school vouchers, the pass, and then your job is to come up with why you don't want it to pass. But it's like real time. So while one at the past, but it's like real time.
Speaker 2:So while I knew there was going to be five policy topics, I had no idea how they were going to approach those topics. So we would prepare a defense that was all over the board. You know you're going to defend a school, you're going to be pro school choice with a but it creates bad outcomes thing. So you like concede the premise but then argue the outcome, or you just go. You know you can't have school choice, take a full communist route. Everybody's got to have the same education, equal protection under the law. So you have these different like ways and point is you don't believe any of it.
Speaker 2:We had this one card. It was called the nuke card and what it was was at the time george bush was in office and on the topic of school vouchers, it was a winning debate like currently, now more and more states are starting to use vouchers, but at the time this was like a Milwaukee school district and a couple of the school districts that were using it to great success. Left behind was a big debate talking point at the time that if he got school vouchers passed, that he would gain political capital and by gaining that political capital he would then have the political freedom to uh, indulge in his most fever fantasy dreams and we would end up in nuclear war with russia or china are you like dry running, like pulling talking points for the president?
Speaker 2:this is cool yeah, basically that's the policy debate is and you're running a whole lot, all of their questions. Yes, yeah, you're debating a policy right okay so this was.
Speaker 1:We called it the nuke card I'm just wondering how much the presidency um pays attention to that and then incorporates into their own position well, this is how it works.
Speaker 2:This is politics like this is the laid out debate of politics is you have to think through. You know all these steps.
Speaker 2:So then, on the offense, we would have a defense for the new card and be like this is ridiculous, right, or we would have some real thing like no, because there's other checks and balances and there's other issues that he'll fill politically. So you can go on to the weeds on it. But the point is we had this new card where we would literally get up and say if, if George Bush gets this minor little win and he gains political capital, that will snowball to the point that we're bombing Russia because he'll be too popular. So we should oppose everything for the sake of world peace. Okay, that was basically the argument and it was a high school thing, but it was all connected with article quotes and this it was a debate thing anybody want to object, anybody want nuclear war?
Speaker 2:come on so what's happened here is trump has played the, but people are dying card enough. And the but people are dying card enough is the trump card. It's the new card too well, but putin's too strong. And then you just go well, russia's russian, they do their thing. So rubio and vance are excellent debaters, and a lot of these tv personalities are too, believe it or not, which is why sometimes they go a little weird, but that's because they're kind of doing this. They, they want to make sure they control it. So as we listen to these clips, keep that in mind. They're basically playing cards back and forth.
Speaker 14:Terry, I want to play something you said about President Putin. This was right after the invasion in March of 2022. Take a look this guy lies.
Speaker 7:He literally lies. He's never kept a deal he's ever signed and he lies all the time and I don't know why. But he plays us like a, like a violin in the west, because the west wants to believe that you can cut a deal with everybody. You can't cut a deal with guys like this.
Speaker 14:He's a professional, experienced liar mr secretary, given that, what makes you think that, if you are able to reach a deal with president putin, that he would stick to it, based on, as you just said, he's a liar?
Speaker 7:Well, that's the point. That's why the deal has to have enforceable mechanisms in it. That's why the deal has to have things like security guarantees. That's the point I was making a few minutes ago when you were asking me about looking someone in the eye. What's important here is actions, not words, not paper documents. Those are all important. Those are elements of a deal, but they have to be enforceable, they have to be verifiable, they have to be enduring. There's no point here in signing a deal that's going to be violated in three or four months. There's no point in doing that. It actually would make things worse. So that's why this is such a difficult thing. Not only do you need a deal, you need a deal that's verifiable, that's enforceable and that's enduring. If you don't achieve that, then I think you could have a ceasefire for a few months, a few weeks, and then the war will start again and more people will die. That's not the outcome we're interested in. That's not the outcome anyone wants. So that's why this is so difficult. All right. Secretary of State.
Speaker 7:Marco. Rubio, thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 2:I feel like we need one of those Joe Rogan moments at the UFC where it's like oh Gotcha, I feel like if there's a case for a reptilian journalist, this is it right here. I feel like it's just. I feel like she's going to blink this way. Whatever she was a sorority sister of Kamala Harris, I have no doubt Hosting the debate Pretty sketchy, okay, okay. So here's another one with marco rubio on with um. This is martha and this is who jd vance. She's like it's just a couple apartments. He's like do you hear yourself.
Speaker 2:A couple apartments in aurora, colorado, have been taken over by a foreign gang. How many is too many? You know how many? At what point is it too much? Like a couple in america. So this is her.
Speaker 11:She's on with rubio, critics of president trump will say the pomp and circumstances like pomp and circumstance, the red carpet, the warm handshake that president trump simply lost that and putin gained there just by being on the world stage and walking down a red carpet with the president. Your reaction to that?
Speaker 7:Well, I mean, critics of President Trump are always going to find something to criticize. You don't pay attention to it anymore. But I will tell you this Putin is already on the world stage. He's already on the world stage. The guy's conducting a full scale war in Ukraine. He's already on the world stage. He has the world's largest tactical nuclear arsenal in the world and the second largest strategic nuclear arsenal in the world. He's already on the world stage. When I hear people say that, oh, it elevates him.
Speaker 7:Well, all we do is talk about Putin all the time. All the media has done is talk about Putin all the time for the last four or five years. That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. Put all that aside. It means you're not going to have a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin. That's not. That's just common sense. I shouldn't have to say it so people can say whatever they want.
Speaker 7:Ultimately, at the end of the day, we have to get the Russian side to agree to things that they don't want to agree to if we're going to have peace. If not, there'll just be a war. They'll keep killing each other and life will go on in America and in the rest of the world, but not for Ukraine. So the president has invested a lot of time in trying to bring an end to this war. He deserves credit for doing that. He gets criticism for doing that. He could have just let this war go on. The president could have just said this is Biden's war. It started under him. We'll do what we can for Ukraine, but we're going to focus on other things. He could have easily said that.
Speaker 11:But he's the only leader in the world that can get.
Speaker 7:Putin to a meeting to talk about serious things.
Speaker 1:Shut up, martha. So you know, I was talking to my wife last night about something else, and here, take my hand. Oh, it went through my hair, right, yeah. And then what is supposed to happen after that? What's supposed to happen? You're supposed to sock me in the shoulder, like you know, okay. Well, what are you supposed to do if you meet with somebody? Not shake their hand? I mean, this is so dumb oh, I know the. I mean, can you imagine donald trump being like oh gotcha, there is a.
Speaker 2:There is a school of thought in american politics that has to do with the nobility. These are the elites. Like the king didn't do his own negotiation. He sent his envoy, he, he, he told them what to do. He didn't get involved in the nitty-gritty. I mean, you're lucky if they wrote a letter. You know what I mean. So there's this idea that the, they're untouched, they walk around and you just touch my hands and just touch my hands. This real thing. Right, like joe biden didn't call up other world leaders. He claimed to call up other world leaders. Right, and talk to him.
Speaker 2:Really, he's probably strong arm on him, but the in the public perception is they don't talk. You know what I mean? Like everything is very formal, very red carpet. They only talk when the deal is done, and there might be some truth to that, just because you have executives. But Trump looks at it like no, this is a business. I got to get down in the trenches. Negotiation is my one and only job. It's the thing I can do. I can bind the company with my signature. You know what I mean. Like I have to be involved. It's different than that aristocratic like send the envoys and then those people have clout and they have their own little fiefdoms of power and you know, like the king's never man, I think if you're meeting face to face, that's way more powerful yeah, trump's the other way around.
Speaker 2:He's like no, I'll pick up the phone, I'll call them hell yeah, and negotiate directly, and I'll be involved in the nitty-gritty details. And I'll call the prime minister and I'll be like, hey, all right, this 13 on beef just isn't going to cut it for us. If we don't have it down to 11.2, I I don't know this thing pencils out, we might have to jump your tariffs to 99 000. I don't know. You know like he gets really into it. Same thing with this, uh, peace deal. You know trump was saying the other day well, putin's been tap, tap, tapping me along, so now putin's on notice. If you keep tap, tap, tapping me along, stuff's gonna happen. So here again is marco rubio.
Speaker 10:Uh, on with face the nation you know there is concern from the europeans that president zelinski is going to be bullied into signing something away. That's why you have these europe European leaders coming as backup tomorrow.
Speaker 7:Can you reassure them? No, it isn't. That's not why they're coming as backup. That's not true. But that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky from being bullied. They're not coming as backup.
Speaker 10:That's February Oval Office meeting in front of television cameras where President Zelensky was dressed down.
Speaker 7:Do you know how many meetings you've had since then?
Speaker 10:oh no, I I know, and I was just up in alaska watching the one with vladimir putin, where red carpet rolls no, but we've had more meetings.
Speaker 7:We've had, we've had. We've had one meeting with putin and like a dozen meetings with zelinski, so that. But that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep zelinski from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the europeans. We talked to them last week. There were meetings in the UK over the fall of the previous weekend.
Speaker 7:And they said the president is going to demand a ceasefire as early as Thursday, but you said that they're coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky for being bullied. They're not coming here tomorrow. This is such a stupid media narrative that they're coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks, for weeks on this stuff. They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come. We invited them to come.
Speaker 10:The president invited them to come, but the president told those European leaders last week that he wanted to cease fire. The president went on television, said he would walk out of the meeting if Vladimir Putin didn't agree with on. He said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes. He spent three hours talking to vladimir putin and he did not get one. So there's obviously something.
Speaker 7:Things happened during that meeting. Well, because obviously things look. Our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh, how dramatic he walked out. Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war. Okay, and obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase. If not, we wouldn't be having Zelensky flying all the way over here, we wouldn't be having all the Europeans coming all the way over here. Now, understand and take with a grain of salt. I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans. Enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this.
Speaker 7:You talk about the sanctions. Look at the end of the day, if peace is not going to be possible here and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands. The president has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions. But if he did this now, the moment the president puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks. You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death and destruction. We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there. We want to wind up with a peace deal that ends this war so Ukraine can go on with the rest of their lives and rebuild their country and be assured that this is never going to happen again. That's the goal here. We're going to do everything possible to make that happen. If it's doable, it will require both sides to make concessions. It will require both sides to get things they're asking for. That's how these deals are made, whether we like it or not.
Speaker 2:You know there's concern from the Europe. So we're foregoing an imaginary ceasefire for an imaginary peace deal.
Speaker 1:I don't understand what the journalistic um, what is the journalistic point to the question? The line of questions that she has where it's like she wants to promote this, the bad angle to the story, like, oh, he needs to walk out, why are you continuing the talks? I mean we need to get this thing shut down. They want it so bad to go badly it is.
Speaker 2:It is actually really phenomenal. It's a good question, but why the motive right? What? What dog do you have in this fight? Well, we got to support democracy and liberty over all over.
Speaker 1:Abolish the senate so why are you sad that we're continuing the talks?
Speaker 2:is the point it's like okay, well, we can't talk to a dictator, Okay, well, I mean how is she? Supposed to get it done? How is she supposed to get it done? You know they got guns too. I can't believe they're shaking hands. I can't believe they're shaking hands.
Speaker 1:Oh, I mean, you guys said you'd storm out in two minutes and you're still talking. Why are you still talking?
Speaker 2:Come on, get out of there, you didn't get a ceasefire in two minutes. Well, there's no point in a ceasefire if no one's going to honor it. Duh.
Speaker 1:I mean there's just so many duhs to all these questions. It just makes you wonder why they ask them.
Speaker 2:So, as far as Ukraine is concerned, the big thing they want is protection. I mean, they'd love to get all their land and territory back. It's probably not going to happen, but what they really want is protection. They are the underdog in this fight and they are fighting with technology. If it weren't for drones, they would have already probably been rolled over.
Speaker 2:But drones it's introductions of drones into the battlefield is the equivalent of the introduction of machine guns to the battlefield in world war one. It has. It has stalled russia to a crawl because they can't advance anything because this little comes flying in. So then they do jammers to jam the radio signals okay, that's great. They detach thousand yard fiber optic strings and they run them through fiber optic strings no radio signals to jam, right. And then now they've got them completely autonomous. Where they're not radio frequency or talking at all, ai takes them, finds a target, detonates no communication back to base, right. This is the equivalent of adding machine guns to trench warfare in world war one. You took the, you took napoleonic wars and those tactics added a machine gun. It was devastating. That's what's going on in Russia and Ukraine right now in their skirmish is. It's a drone war.
Speaker 1:And maybe, maybe, what these guys need is the Nevada fishing float tube. All right, anglers, you're ready to fish remote lakes or quiet rivers in total stealth mode? Check out Nevada fishing float Tube from Catasports. This U-shaped beast is built for serious fishing missions ultra stable, super maneuverable and tough as nails. Thanks to heavy-duty ripstop material and double-stitched seams. You've got a padded backrest, oversized seat, two large gear pockets, rod holder, stripping apron and even a dry fly patch Everything you need to stay locked in and ready when the bite is on. Fluorescent accents keep you visible out on the water, and carry handles make it easy to haul in and out. Whether you're chasing bass in the shallows or hiking into alpine trout lakes, the Nevada float tube is built for the job. Use code Rumble at checkout for 10% off your order today. That's caddisforcecom. Get out there and stay light.
Speaker 2:catch the big one you left the camera on me the whole time. Sorry, it's a background ad. I mean a float tube probably keep you safe from the drone or make you a real obvious target. You know, I thought one of the funniest things I ever heard was Joe Rogan say you know, if the missile comes, I want it to hit me in the head. I don't want to be around for the aftermath. Yeah, be on a float tube, get the job done. That's too perfect. I'm probably going to come back and be like like you didn't switch the camera over. Oh man, yes, yes phrase.
Speaker 2:Your second ad prime time is true. We're gonna knock these things out. Oh, let's see. Uh, are you referring to ukraine allen, sapphire patriot? Who? What are you talking about there? Ukraine allen, ukraine allen? I don't know who ukraine allen is. Okay, let's listen to steve wickoff. Uh, he's going to talk about what trump and putin said to each other in the meeting, as well as the security guarantees that ukraine needs to basically, you know, decide to stop fighting in terms of ukrainian security guarantees.
Speaker 17:You you mentioned, uh, the article 5 guarantee of nato. An attack on one and it's an attack on all Russia would allow that to happen. That any further incursions into Ukraine Russia would understand would be seen as an attack on all NATO members.
Speaker 8:No, Jake, that's not what I said. No, Jake, that's not what I said. What I said is that we got to an assuming that that held, assuming that the Ukrainians could agree to that and could live with that, and everything is going to be is going to be about what the Ukrainians can live with, but assuming they could. We were able to win the following concession that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO. We sort of were able to bypass that and get an agreement that the United States could offer Article 5 protection, which was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.
Speaker 2:That's pretty good. That's actually a really big deal because think about it, this whole war, when you go back and you trace the origins of kind of how this conflict started. It started with Ukraine being added to the list of potential NATO countries and with the president's directive that we were going to march that direction that was a stated bright line by putin himself over and over and over.
Speaker 2:Yes over and over yes, exactly so all of a sudden we are marching to assimilation, which is essentially the nato march to military assimilation, over to ukraine and russia's like. We ain't having any of that. That would literally be like the soviet union, just you know, having mexico join the soviets you know not happening you know like gonna be a problem and so, uh, that has been a red line.
Speaker 2:But apparently this is the big shift. Russia has kind of had this attitude that nat, nato membership or any type of security guarantees that are equivalent to NATO, is one in the same. So this is where they're saying it can be separated, like you can have some security guarantees based on your mineral rights and maybe whatever you've got, but not so far as joining NATO itself, because with NATO comes other things. With NATO comes PSYOPs, comes a whole bunch of other stuff, comes other things. With nato comes psyops, comes a whole bunch of other stuff with commercial, with with um protection guarantees.
Speaker 2:That's like we're going to protect our contractors, we're going to protect our american corporations, right it's financial streams yeah, it's a little bit different versus we're going to get you guys to live in our truman show where you know, nato, nato, nato, they've got their whole human rights religion thing going on. If nato, if you know, if these military organizations weren't involved in like the climate change and all that kind of stuff, you could say that, but that's, they've got their own little human rights liberal religion agenda thing going on and that's what they. You know, when you join nato, you're kind of joining this global warming cult. I don't know how else to describe it. So this is another one steve wickoff, after trump and putin met, he uh was this newsmax, I think it was, and we were on. No, he was on fox sunday with uh shannon bream and he said the phone with president zelensky.
Speaker 8:moments after this, the uh alaska summit ended and I I can tell you that I spoke to him personally gave him my view. The president obviously was making the presentation and everybody recognized on that telephone call and there were various European leaders how much progress we had made in demonstrating that the Russian Federation was going to make significant accommodations, well beyond what we thought before that summit started. So it was absolutely acknowledged as a win. Now, that being said, there are details. That's what happens in a negotiation you try to move one side towards the middle, then you try to move the other side towards the middle. The president achieved that. Move the other side towards the middle. The president achieved that. Certainly in my view and in the view of many others as well, but I was sitting right there the president achieved that beyond what everyone's expectations were, and now we're immediately moving to a meeting with the Ukrainians, with the Europeans, and hopefully we can narrow the issues down even further and get ourselves well along the way towards the codification of a peace deal.
Speaker 2:I'll be honest with you, and I mean this sincerely I want to live in a world where I can take my family and visit Moscow. Yeah, that'd be cool and feel safe about it, yeah.
Speaker 2:I want to live in a world where we have full commercial arrangements with Russia, no symbol dissimilar than we do with India or Japan or anything else, where the only thing we got to overcome is the language barrier and then we're free to do business Right. You know what I mean. I want to live in that world I have. When I look at Russiansians, I see nothing that is offensive to me nothing in fact, I see a people that have overcome communism, which makes me feel a kinship to them.
Speaker 1:Yeah, I mean I got a couple of youtube channels I watch that are just russian dudes. Like one guy is a beekeeper, I love watching his stuff I don't feel any different than ukrainian.
Speaker 2:No, I mean I to me, your cousins, like I don't you know you just Ukrainian. No, I mean I to me, your cousins, like I don't you know, you, just speak a different language, I, and I feel that way about all countries. There's no country that I look at in intrinsically in my soul, as a peasant who just works, thinks you repulse me, there's none right. I can obviously look in some and say your uniform looks different, your skin's different, but even that is immediately overcome by things like religion. You know, oh, you're a Christian, oh, I'm a Christian too. Ok, great, you see what I'm saying. Like there's these layers of unity that we can have. There's nothing about Russia or Russian culture. To me, that is repulsive.
Speaker 2:Do they lean a little bit more authoritarian through history? Yeah, they do. Do Americans lean a little bit more authoritarian through the through history? Yeah, they do. Do americans lean a little bit more democratic? Yeah, we do. Part of it is the nature of this is a new land and it's. We've only been here 200 and 400 years. You know, slow, really, around where we live. We've only been here like 100 years. Yeah, I mean, I'll be honest with you. I mean yep, yeah. So in fact we very much, very much are in the tradition of frontiersmen in the pacific northwest.
Speaker 1:Yeah, as we well, I mean our county was um established in 1857, I think, so it's like only 150 years eight people in it.
Speaker 2:Yeah, I know, and we had the you. Basically it was just a logging outpost.
Speaker 9:Yes, you know, but yeah, it's we're really not that old, yeah, so.
Speaker 2:Russia has a much longer, deeper tradition, much more familial, that kind of thing. Anyways, point being nothing repulsive, even Hillary Clinton, I think, ultimately feels this way. I mean, she sold a bunch of uranium to Russia, gave a lot of hypersonic secrets to the skokavo uh situation, so I mean, it's not like she probably doesn't feel this way too, and she even is seeing ultimately that if trump can get some peace, he's doing pretty well. Listen to some shocking admissions from.
Speaker 12:I actually was encouraged um by the events of the last several months. First of all, the NATO commitment by individual member states to increase their defense spending is very welcome. It's something that prior administrations have certainly sought, and I think it's great that we are seeing these commitments that now have to be followed through. On the willingness of European countries to support Ukraine, and, by doing so, by American weapons in order to provide them to the Ukrainians. I think all of that is a very good signal that there is beginning to be a better understanding, both by the president and the people around him, as well as by the leaders of our european uh allies, that there can be uh common ground uh amongst us and the kind of dismissiveness that okay, I gotta say because, remember, she simultaneously has dnc servers in ukraine yeah you've got the biden family on the burisma board.
Speaker 2:They have their massive entanglements in ukraine through george soros and those networks. Simultaneously they're selling stuff to russia. So for them they're playing both sides oh yeah sides.
Speaker 2:They would love for ukraine to have some defense, to keep the setup separate from russia, but they don't mind having commercial business with russia. Just like I said, the world I want to live in we can do business. Like you know, business is good in russia for the clintons, so what do you call it? So she's like you guys are kind of doing both. You're going to defend ukraine while at the same time open up russia so that I'm less scrutinized for having done business there. This is the most self-serving praise of donald trump I've ever seen. I'm glad he's finally coming around to the conclusion we came to oh, yeah, yeah with russia and and backdoor with ukraine.
Speaker 1:Like I'm glad that you guys have finally come around to our point of view like, I'm so glad you're able to make the deals that we were trying so hard to make for the last decade. It's like so much bullshit exactly.
Speaker 12:I can't even take it anymore, and the first Trump administration has been replaced by a much more obvious working relationship to the good of European security, transatlantic security and, hopefully, ukrainian security. So I'm actually encouraged. So that's pretty.
Speaker 1:What do you call it when somebody tries to usurp somebody else's goodwill like this? Grifting.
Speaker 2:Yeah, there you go. In the Bible they call them face dealers, game stealers. Yeah, so Trump has this really mastermind plan of coming hard and fast. We can't cover the Trump administration like we're kind of covering some bigger themes and the stuff that's, you know, the russiagate, collusion and justice and yeah there's so much is dripping off and falling through the cracks that we dismiss oh, totally.
Speaker 2:You know, every now and then, epa thing will come out and be like that's a big deal, like we're getting rid of all emission standards, all yeah, that's a whole.
Speaker 1:Hey, farmers, you don't have to buy any more debt.
Speaker 2:Yeah, yeah, that's a huge deal those freaking egr filters off right now. So I'm waiting to see for that to officially go through. But either way, trump and his administration, their idea is you've got to attack, attack, attack. This is political war. The speech we played at the beginning, with what trump was saying like this is the last chance to reshape. At the beginning, with what trump was saying like this is the last chance to reshape the government, to be something for we, the people, by the people, for the people. And he's the avatar of that. Like, whether you like him or not, whether you want to praise him or not, he is the lincoln of our day, he is the washington of our day.
Speaker 1:There's no one else close which maybe is why we sound like Trump cultists, but we're not. We're not, we just want to take advantage of this moment because once it's gone, we're going to be back into this washing machine and the Democrats are going to recycle all the old bullshit and we're going to be back under control, and then we'll never have a chance to get out of this again.
Speaker 2:Things are being changed and I know for a fact the administration has an open ear. Yeah, we are feeding by doing this show day after day. We are feeding the AI with something to be a counterpoint to world economic forum nonsense or whatever else is out there. Right, we are feeding the algorithm. We are feeding AI with our human thought to a counter. Right, try to bring the pendulum back to the middle.
Speaker 2:Yeah, trump is coming at this as an absolute attack dog. He's attacking every vector of their power. Act blues under investigation. The democrats who came after trump using lawfare techniques are all under investigation.
Speaker 2:It's alleged that brennan is living in austria and has zero plans to ever return to the united states. He's doing all of his media. It's from a remote studio, right? Um call me has gone, basically radio silent, putting nothing out but the most encrypted things. Clappard's lawyered up. Stop going on tv. You still have a handful of them that are going on and defending it. They're still in the collusion, they're still in the conspiracy, but some of them it sounds like from what people are saying have started the flip right. So there's pressure on there.
Speaker 2:Trump's coming after epa and all the gold bars dropped off the back of the titanic, like they said. He's going after the regulations that created the ability for bureaucrats to control. He's got the irs in an absolute tizzy and a fit right now. I mean, they've got multiple directors. Now it's under the treasury. They're doing stuff. Treasury's getting rid of their magic money printers. They're not just approving every payment that goes out the door anymore. You've got pressure on the federal reserve. You've got pressure on the house and the senate. You've got, you know, deportations happening. Whether people like it or not, it's super popular in polling, wildly unpopular in politics, okay, and so you've got all these things happening. And then trump comes out this morning and he goes. I'm going to lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots, so oh wait, I thought we were talking about russia.
Speaker 1:We're talking about, about today, buddy you know, for the people that want to call us a trump death cult or whatever, I I would prefer that you call us something else, and that's because, once trump leaves office, we will no longer be talking about Trump, we'll be talking about whoever the next guy is to lead this continuation of, you know, the reformed America forward. And we'll, you know, call us a freedom cult. How about that? We're a freedom cult.
Speaker 2:Alan Mongrel Von cleve says this. He says will the pendulum stop at the center? And I'm replying not as long as new energy is added. Physics says you can't add, otherwise eventually, yes, okay.
Speaker 2:So einrand and atlas, shrugged through the character Francisco D'Anconio, says to defeat a vicious fraud, comply with it literally, adding nothing of your own to disguise its very nature. So the whole point is you comply with it literally to show it's broken. You don't add any input, you don't try to fix anything, you just let it run its course and the laws of entropy, no matter what, will cause it to stop going. So the only way is to remove yourself from the system, alan. We had a discussion over the weekend. This is the be Amish. Get out of the system, stop participating, stop adding your energy and your virtue to it by acknowledging the premise of its legitimacy. Right In the New Testament, bible is encouraging the saints who at this time are trying to free themselves from rome and the various tribes and different, you know, warlord type subjugation that they were under, and he's like stop going to their courts, the secular courts. Nobody wins when you do that. Settle things amongst yourselves, right? This is the whole idea of render to caesar with caesar and then you're free. Stop dealing with his coins and then he'll stop having his hand in your pocket. That's the whole idea here. So that's when we stop adding energy, then the pendulum stops, but then we just move the energy somewhere else, because we, the people, are nothing but energy, if anything else.
Speaker 2:Okay, so Donald Trump is coming head-to-head with the election apparatus. I'm going to lead a movement to get rid of all of mail imbalance. This is a big deal for us in washington state, because we are exclusively mail imbalance and also, while we're at it, the highly inaccurate, very expensive and seriously controversial voting machines, which cost 10 times more than than accurate and sophisticated watermark paper, which is faster and leaves no doubt at the end of the evening as to who won and who lost the election. In Washington state, we use mail in ballots and we count them on Dominion voting machines, so we got the double whammy band. I'm pretty sure everybody's doing that. Even if you're voting in person, they're still getting counted on the machines. Yep, there is nothing good about these machines I'm going to jump ahead here.
Speaker 2:Here was a video that was put out this weekend, which is not a brand new video, but this is them actually hacking the voter machines in real time, and I'm just going to show you here that, basically, it's completely easy for them.
Speaker 9:Here's the ballot, and the printed ballot doesn't print the question. All it says is proposition one yes or no. Someone says yes or no. You look at the ballot. It says what you want it to say, but it's the opposite of what your intent was. So we're going to do it anyways. They go through here. How they they actually are able to hack the ballot and manipulate the vote in real time and go to review, and it wasn't even that hard for them to do so anyways.
Speaker 2:So trump back to this. Leave no doubt at the end. Who won? Leave no doubt at the end of one and lost. We are now the only country in the world that uses mail-in voting. I don't know if it's the only country, but it wouldn't be surprised me. I don't know. All others gave it up because of the massive voter fraud encountered.
Speaker 2:We will begin this effort, which will be strongly opposed by the Democrats, because they cheat at levels never before seen before. There's that inoculation. They're going to screech Right. What did Kamala Harris say? They're trying to change the rules of the game for the state Trying to cheat. Yeah, if you've got so many great black and Latino voters, just get them to the polls. Good luck by signing an executive order to help bring honesty to the 2026 midterms. So they're not letting the opportunity pass. They're not going to let the House flip. Is basically what he's. This is what this tells me they're going to put the pressure on. Remember, the states are merely an agent for the federal government in counting and tabulating the votes. Oh, alan, you heard that States are just agents of the feds. The United States isn't. It's not the United States of America, it's the United States is America. Yes, they must do what the federal government, as represented by the president of the United States, tells them. There's that dictator.
Speaker 2:Talk again for the good of our country to do, which, by the way, I mean the most efficient country. You know the most efficient leadership is the benevolent dictator with their horrible radical left policies like open borders, men playing in sports, transgender and woke for everyone, and so much more so. He's connecting the voting to these other 90 10 issues, because, really, truly, it's a 90 10 issue, right? Democrats are virtually unelectable without using this completely disproven mail-in scam. Elections can never be honest with mail and ballots voting, and everybody, in particular the democrats, know this, and I and the republican party will fight like hell to bring honesty and integrity back to our elections. The mail-in ballot hoax using voting machines that are complete and total disaster must end now. Remember, without fair and honest elections and strong and powerful borders, you don't even have a semblance of a country.
Speaker 2:Thank you for your attention to this matter. Donald j jump, president of the united states of america, apparently, when he puts in the thank you for your attention to this matter, that's him telling his staff and anybody that's relevant and involved is that you need to jump on this ASAP and basically, this is a papal bull. I've wanted to see that tweet for four and a half years.
Speaker 2:I have wanted to see that tweet for four and a half years.
Speaker 1:Hey, there's almost nothing more important right now than voting in America.
Speaker 2:If there's any way that you can be blackpilled, it's looking into the election system and you know. At that point you realize you're fighting. You're fighting an information war. You're trying to fight the zeitgeist and change the zeitgeist.
Speaker 1:You also realize that you are fighting for your life.
Speaker 2:You're fighting for your life. Yes, you don't realize. You know the votes. That's not a reliable methodology. When it's all mail in and all, all machines, there's too many points. And it doesn't matter how honest your assessors are. You could put Mother Teresa in as your election official.
Speaker 1:But when you've got dual SIM cards and multiple Wi-Fi routers and listen, when it comes to elections, the only person I'm trusting to count that correctly is Jesus.
Speaker 2:Ninety nine percent of people cannot read code, don't understand how to secure a Wi-Fi router. I don't Right. I mean, I'm completely useless at stuff like that. Now I can get your septic system unclogged, which a lot of those coders don't know how to do off, which a lot of those coders don't know how to do.
Speaker 2:yeah, I do believe in the division of labor, but at the same time you're looking at a foreign language with, with space tech. You know, when you're looking at these voting machines, a paper goes in and then just tabulates all these numbers. You have no idea what it's doing and you don't. You don't have any hand count capacity. You know what I mean. When you look at what they did at the cyber symposium with cyber ninjas down in Arizona, where they had the table set up with the wheels to count, like if you're not in the business of hand counting ballots, you don't know how to hand count ballots and then you factor in like why are we counting photocopies? You know hand counting ballots is the only way to go in person voting small local precincts and districts. You should vote at your local elementary school, your local fire station, your local police station, your local sheriff's department, your local Kiwanis Club. You know anything, I don't care. You should be voting everywhere, and it should be. You know tabulation centers should have a thousand vote ballots to count. So even if that tabulation center decides to go hog wild and go thousand to one, it's not going to throw off the margin in an entire state. But when you have a voting center like they did, the big, huge, mega voting centers, like they did in 2020, which they've continued. Yeah, you're processing hundreds of thousands of ballots. You can swing 50,000 ballots one direction and it's all in your, under your control. Very, very, very fair, very frustrating. So I'm super excited to see that Trump's doing that.
Speaker 2:And, and if you're the Democrats right now, if you're the Mark Elias, is Norm Isom's, the guys that are running this lawfare. Think about how many fronts Trump has you fighting on running this lawfare. Think about how many fronts Trump has you fighting on. I mean, you might win a little battle over here and slow down the deportation You're never going to stop it, but you might slow it down a little bit for one class of people. And then you've got the election stuff. Okay, you might, might preserve some gerrymandering in one state, but you have another one where you lose. And then you've got this election thing and he's got the power of the purse. He's telling the states I won't pay if you don't get rid of the machines. And you know, I I talked to a house of representatives member here for the state of washington this weekend and I asked him point blank you know, is washington salvageable? And he was. He gave me the. That's the question I don't want to answer.
Speaker 2:Look oh you know, and I was I was like, is it salvageable? And he's like, basically not, until we get into the majority and how we get there. It's a tough road with the election system and that's what he said Says the only way we save Washington is if the feds cut the money, he says, which they sent a letter, pam Bondi did. They're going to cut $11 billion shortfall and so we might comply with some of these executive orders because of sanctuary cities and stuff like that, because of the money.
Speaker 1:And the deadline for that compliance is coming up. It's like on the 19th.
Speaker 2:Yeah. So that was the only thing he thought could really make a difference is we need help from the feds. One of the things he told me that I was unaware of is the entire United States uses Robert's rules of of order, which gives the minority a voice in parliamentary procedure. Washington state uses reads rules of order, which completely is power-sided to the majority, so in the minority they can't force a vote, stop a vote, like they're just almost passive watchers in the thing alan mongol says now you're talking, it has to burn to the ground to be fixed. Yeah, hold on alan this is the public side.
Speaker 2:We don't, we don't use those incendiary words. This is a family show. This is a family show we're not talking about burning nothing down. This is a peaceful protest. You know we're.
Speaker 2:It's gonna burn down on its own, we don't have to throw anything into no logs you know it's funny because a little uh and alan, I love the comment, but I tweeted out a fire emoji emoji on a lynn wood tweet talking about burned it down. Yeah, I lit out a fire emoji that tweet. The fire emoji showed up. Of the five or six tweets they had on me that I had said something incendiary, one of them was the fire emoji, followed by light them up as a as a retweet of someone else's tweet talking about dc burning down, and I put light them up. They showed up in a federal court trial showing my intent to go to dc and do violence.
Speaker 1:Yeah, so just careful.
Speaker 2:Careful in the chats. The public show. We saved that for the private side, just kidding. Uh, honestly, everything is hyperbolic rhetoric. We're just sitting behind a desk, okay. Another funny thing that happens. Remember the laura loomer incident? Or a deposition on the mayor trial about marjorie taylor green taking uh arby's in her pocket? So so apparently these two ladies don't love each other very much.
Speaker 2:Over the weekend, las vegas metropolitan arrested eight child sex predators. These were people that were trying to solicit minors. One of those arrested was this tom artiem alexandrovich. Turns out he is the. He is the. What's his job? He is the national cyber security authority. Israel. He's their national cyber security order, the. He's their head. So he's the head of the cyber national cyber security authority. He was in las vegas on vacation and he solicited a minor for sex and got arrested by him.
Speaker 2:So today they netanyahu's office issued a statement denying that the point in question had even been arrested. A state employee who traveled to the us for professional matters was questioned by the american authorities during his stay. The prime minister office said the employee, who does not hold a diplomatic visa, was not arrested and returned to israel as scheduled. So, huh, we are either looking at gas lighting yeah, or looking at a cover-up yeah, because he absolutely was arrested, he absolutely got mug shotted. And now they're saying these is not the droids you're looking for. So we're gonna watch this one. Marjorie taylor tweets out this. She goes did our government release a child sex predator from Israel who works directly under prime minister of Israel? How did? And now Netanyahu is lying and completely denying it. Why isn't Mark Levine pissing, pitching a hissy fit over this? Why isn't Laura Laura Loomer rage, posting about this and claiming she broke the story and OK.
Speaker 2:Yeah, story and uh, okay, yeah update. Prime minister benjamin netanyahu is lying, claiming. The executive order director of israel national cyber security cyber dictatorate, tom alex dronovich, was not arrested, according to a statement released to mediate. The las vegas metro police department's press release, which is still live on their site, clearly states he was an in a sting targeting child sex predators. Also should be noted that the israel national cyber directorate is located in netanyahu's office. That's how closely his team works with net wow, wow yeah I don't have an ad read for that one.
Speaker 2:Okay, how are we doing here? We're doing pretty good, okay. So we've got a couple more. We got one more thing here, okay. So this is something that I have had this discussion with multiple people about illegal immigration and I've shared my story before. I used to hire illegal immigrants out of home depot parking lots and I had a crew of them that I worked with for well over a year. Hard workers didn't think there was any problem with them.
Speaker 1:Paid them cash, sometimes paid them a check, they just go cash them well, they were kind of like day laborers, but they just stuck around for a while laborers that I had work every day, right, right.
Speaker 2:That's essentially what it amounted to, and one day one of them beat someone else and so, long story short, the guy ended up getting called the tacoma police department. Police department didn't want to do anything. Moment I said he was illegal, I thought they would like oh, just that alone, we'll come pick him up why did you?
Speaker 2:say so. We're like call ice. Oh, he's using a gun in a commission of a crime. Call ice, we don't want nothing to do with it, okay. So I call ice. Ice picks him up, he goes to the detention center for two months. After two months he gets out. He'd already been deported twice before, by the way.
Speaker 2:I found out in his life third time's a charm, though, they gave him a green card. So now? So he should have been sitting in prison for 10 to 15 for assault with a deadly weapon. Instead they got a green card after two months of processing. So to me I'm like, if you this, who's illegal and who's legal, and who has paperwork and who doesn't have paperwork this is a minefield because you have layers of jurisdiction and there's multiple weak entry points into the system. So if you have states that are willing to give residents a driver's license, but to establish residency you just need a utility bill, and the utility bill doesn't require ID to create the name, and you can take utility bill down to the DMV and get a license, and then that license gets the presumption of citizenship or legality. You start climbing this ladder to where, pretty soon, you have like a commercial driver's license and you've got a job with a, with an international carrier, and you're just off to the races.
Speaker 2:So that's what happened with this gentleman right here okay this gentleman right here sitting in the driver's seat of this semi-truck along with his co-driver.
Speaker 1:This is a very tragic situation.
Speaker 2:But he decided to flip a ue on the interstate and in order to do this, he went into the far left, far right lane, yep. And then he cut all the way across the two lanes to take the emergency vehicle turnout. You know the old sign that says emergency vehicles. Only you know that one it's.
Speaker 2:It's for cops he was gonna flip a ue on the interstate in a semi truck. So as he's casually doing this, you know he makes his turn. Now he's fully t-boned on the you know crossing the interstate, just casually does this. Then suddenly you can see in his camera footage here, which it froze in a perfect moment because I guess we didn't want to show that but a minivan a minivan full of three people slams into it, all dead.
Speaker 2:Yeah, so he has now been arrested for homicide. Right, because that's he's gonna spend some time. Yeah, it's very unfortunate. This man crossed the southern border in 2018 illegally. He made his way to california where they issued a driver's license. Then he was able to get his commercial driver's license and get on with one of these fleets.
Speaker 1:At no point was he ever legal and he's on our roads apparently with no instruction of any kind, and he maybe he didn't even know that this was an illegal maneuver, because wherever he's from, they probably do it all the time who knows.
Speaker 2:And then, right after this happened, they caught someone up in in canada doing the same thing, crossing over the median in a semi-truck, right right, but it's just another that the cleanup of this, like cleanup aisle nine. I mean it is going to take a minute for them to figure out. This is why they wanted information from the irs and stuff like that is because there are so many back doors that people can become quote legal and get some papers right. I'm in the construction industry. I'm highly sensitive to it because I'm like you know, if it's so hard to get here legally and have all the proper paperwork, you'd think you'd speak English by the time you got here, or you think you. You know what I mean. Like it's very difficult.
Speaker 2:I've been the foreigner in a foreign land. I lived in Japan for four years. I lived in Brazil for four years. I speak Portuguese fluently because, as a courtesy to the people living there, I thought it might be nice to be able to ask them where the restroom was, rather than pee my pants. You know what I mean. So I thought I might learn their language.
Speaker 2:Like I've been the foreigner in another land, it's inconceivable to me that I would come to another land and tell people how to live their lives or how to or to be there illegally. You know what I mean. Like it's inconceivable to me, having been someone who spent six years living abroad. So how is it that they think it's justifiable to do here? What mentality, what conditioning have they been taught? And is it just the system validates them by constantly giving them the right piece of paper they need for the next step in their journey? I mean, it's wild Contra contra.
Speaker 2:Juxtapose that with my friend Earl, who's down in New Mexico, who is a U S citizen right, who got kicked out of the prison system, pre-trial, no conviction or anything, with no documentation. He's having a heck of a time. He's having a heck of a time getting help, getting assistance, trying to get an id. You know it's amazing to me that someone can walk across the southern border and in a number of years, probably be making six figures driving truck. I can't even get my friend to roll a bus ticket to get out of albuquerque, because I can't. You know what I mean. Like because he can't get on the bus, because he doesn't have id. Turns out you could be an illegal immigrant. You can drive the bus, but I can't get my friend earl on the bus anyways, all right, guys, it's about that time. It's time for us to jump over to private hold on hold on we got one more coming I got one more.
Speaker 1:Let's do it, okay.
Speaker 1:You've probably noticed rumble is growing fast and it's not slowing down oh yeah they're building a real alternative to big tech that puts creators first and actually protects free speech. And now there's rumble premium, an easy way to upgrade your experience. With premium, you get ad-free viewing across the platform. No pre-rolls, no interruptions, just the content you came for. Plus, premium members unlock exclusive content like bonus videos, like behind the scene drops and more from your favorite creators. Right now, rumble is offering ten dollars off on an annual subscription. Just go to rumblecom slash premium and use the promo code studio at checkout. That's rumblescom slash premium promo code studio no ads, more freedom and content you actually care about.
Speaker 2:That's the deal yes, rumble, and we are going to go over to rumble private. We are going to watch a hilarious, oh sweet, a hilarious, yet historically true history of the democrat party. And we are also going to watch an ed martin interview with maria bartolomo that is full of nuggets. Remember, he's on the doj weaponization group, he's a pardon attorney, he's going after all these guys and he was spotted in manhattan outside of leticia, james leticia, james's house. So that is pretty awesome. We're going to be watching that video. So with that we'll run our little outro and then we'll jump over into private and we'll see you guys there. Thank you so much. Big day for us today.
Speaker 2:Three ad reads, and they weren't that bad rumble, premium tubes. So go get yourself a float tube. If anybody out there I love fly fishing, by the way, it's like probably one of my favorite outdoor sports, outdoor activities, and I don't get to go enough. Like I don't get to go enough, I need your secret spot. So if anybody out there knows good fly fishing spots and wants to invite me geez, cuts me off, I'd probably make a trip out of it. So, just saying, love to fish your secret spots, I'll bring my float tube.
Speaker 4:Old woman, man, man, sorry what night. Lived in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I, I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, there's some lovely filth down here oh.
Speaker 18:How do you do? How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 4:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 18:If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No-one lives there.
Speaker 4:Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet.
Speaker 4:I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then. The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 4:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bint had lobbed scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, will you shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Oh, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
Speaker 2:all right, welcome private listeners. We're still not private. Uh, welcome public listeners, hanging out till we actually go private. Now we're private. All right, now we're private. All right, welcome private listeners. Rumble premium listeners, you guys are the best. Thank you for joining us today. Okay, we are going to jump right into this and we are going to watch. This is a longer interview. I wanted to save it for the private side. I apologize if you caught it yesterday on morning with maria's but ed martin, who is really the I don't know of an attorney at the doj. He's the most prominent aggressive attorney and he's on the weaponization group, so he interviewed with maria. We're going to let this play. We'll probably stop it a couple times times and talk about it, but it's a nine minute interview but it's pretty golden. He's kind of laying out the direction he's going and the accountability they want to have happen. So let's parse it together.
Speaker 19:Authorized leaks of classified information to damage President Trump during his first term. The whistleblower, a longtime Democrat staffer on the House Intelligence Committee, said Schiff was upset because he expected to be the CIA director in a Hillary Clinton presidency. In a statement to Fox News, a spokesperson for Schiff said this Kash Patel's latest smear against Senator Schiff is absolutely and categorically false and is the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the president and his allies meant to distract from their plummeting polls and the Epstein-Files scandal. Joining me now in the Sunday Morning Futures exclusive is the director of the DOJ Weaponization Working Group, Ed Martin. He's investigating the weaponization of government, including Adam Schiff, New York Attorney General Letitia James, for mortgage fraud and the January 6th probe, among others. Ed Martin, great to have you this morning. Thanks very much for being here.
Speaker 6:Always a pleasure, Maria.
Speaker 19:And Ed, it has really truly been a decade of dirty tricks and that's being kind about it against Donald Trump, beginning with the Russia hoax to the impeachments, to the indictments, to the Hunter Biden laptop. Assess for us the last 10 years in your view, and you have criminal referrals right now on Adam Schiff, letitia James, among others. What is the status?
Speaker 6:Well, first of all, thanks for asking about the last 10 years. I mean, you know, when Donald Trump came into office as president, he signed an executive order saying go and find out how government was weaponized against the citizens. When Attorney General Bondi came into office, she put a memo, put more specifics to it and said get to the bottom of this. She gave a specific, specific list and a broad charge and I have to tell you for your viewers, we have the Attorney General Bondi has that, that Department of Justice spinning like a top. We've got more stuff going on. A lot of it we can't talk about because of the nature of it, but it's going like crazy.
Speaker 6:And one of them was we were in a group we're still in it working on the Russia hoax and Tulsi Gabbard declassified what happened and she sent it over to us to DOJ as a criminal referral and that's ongoing now. But what that was and, maria, you're one of the earliest I think you might be the only person, the only journalist, who said early on this is a Russia hoax. And, and you know, brett had President Trump on an interview on that flight to Alaska and in the interview President Trump said the Russia hoax was meant to destroy the relationship with Russia, make it impossible to get things under control, get a reset like Hillary said she wanted. Wanted so what we have in the department of justice. So I'm curious I'm curious.
Speaker 2:He talks about pam bondy having it running like a top. I'm curious. I take ed martin to be pretty authentic and genuine. He's a fast talker but he's also like a bullet point guy, like he's saying these things because these are happening. He doesn't have his, he doesn't have like, uh, he doesn't have to keep the story straight in his head, so it makes sense. So he jumps around a little bit because he's just, he's not lying, he's not lying, so just kind of talk about whatever he's saying.
Speaker 2:So he says he has the justice department running like a top. They've obviously dumped quite a few people, so I'm super curious as to like this is a big organization.
Speaker 2:Did you just take all the people that were kind of just like, well, I'm just here because I'm a good attorney and I'll do what my supervisor says. I don't have to think too much about the agenda, I just prosecute the crime, right? If all of a sudden you're left with that pool of people that are like, yeah, we're willing to go hard on illegals, go hard gun crime, you just, you just tell us we can and we will. You know what I mean. Like how much of the top crust was able to tell the lowest prosecutor drop that gun charge. Or you know what I mean create a series of policies where the prosecutor's like well, looks like I gotta charge him as a minor, no bail and no prison time. You know what I'm saying? So when he's like it's running like a top, that could really yield some fruit. I kind of know the awesome power of the government and it can definitely put some serious pressure on people.
Speaker 6:This now is a weaponization working group and the backing of our leadership to go and find this stuff. And so the Russia hoax. We know the birthday of the Russia hoax it's December 8th 8th 2016 where the obama administration, including obama, said don't put the truth out, lie and ask the media to help us. And the washington post and others jumped right in.
Speaker 2:And then we had the russia hoax that went on for 10 everything we have seen leading up to that date was the intelligence groups doing their job. What looked like correctly. This looks like bad info. It's full of hearsay. It doesn't predicate an investigation. This is a political dirty trick. This is just Hillary's thing. Beware, beware, beware, right the whole thing. And then all of a sudden, that date happens, they have their little working group or whatever, and everything becomes. Don't beware team sport. That's our story. We're sticking to it.
Speaker 1:And we rewrite the president's daily brief to say something that's a lie.
Speaker 2:That's where it started. Yes, right so up until that point there's enough opposition and enough clear eyes looking at things that this is a dead upon arrival dossier. But after that date it starts to get legs of its own years.
Speaker 6:And every time they get in trouble meaning the deep state and others they throw another hoax out. And all we're doing at DOJ and all we're doing across the government is saying get the truth out. And then, by the way, let's hold people accountable. And that's exactly what's going on. So when Bill Pulte sends a criminal referral over to us and he says, letitia James and Adam Schiff and, by the way, both their lawyers have come out and talked publicly about that criminal referral, so you can talk to them about the specifics, because I'm going to tell you what we're going to do is we're going to follow the facts.
Speaker 6:Every American has a more that has a mortgage or has other documents they sign has to follow the law. We're going to go to the very bottom of the facts and if somebody did something wrong, we're not only going to hold them accountable, we're also going to look at everything else that they've been doing. Because when you're a liar, you lie not just on one thing. When you're a cheater, you cheat not just on one thing. When you're a cheater, you cheat not just on one thing. When you're doing corruption, you generally don't just do it on one thing. So we have, that's our. That's our, what we're asked to do as prosecutors, and that's what we're doing well, we are all waiting for accountability here.
Speaker 19:Adam ship went on sunday morning programs and so what that looks like.
Speaker 2:If they did it the way I would want them to do it, they would go ahead and arrest Letitia and Adam for this mortgage fraud thing and then they would just start adding charges, just start adding charges and at some point they'll probably take a plea deal on the mortgage fraud to make the charges stop getting added. You know you'll go mortgage fraud. You can go to jail for 15 years. Or we can add in this addition charge there's another 15 or 20. Or we can also add in this public corruption charge and we can also have this solicitation of a bribe charge. You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2:And so pretty soon it's like I did mortgage corruption. I did. It Could be the way they go or not, We'll see. Or they can spend the next four years gathering information and then not have time to prosecute and dump it on the next president, who may or may not be someone we like and there was although if they get rid of those mail-in balances, I have a feeling it will be someone we like. But then we have to factor in the the ultimate fear factor that all the man on the street interviews of uneducated people would be our downfall how, how would how would you uh feel about adam schiff as cia director?
Speaker 19:that's where we were headed in plain sight and he was the chairman of the intelligence committee, so he had to know better that there was no evidence of any collusion in plain sight. So are you saying that this criminal referral is about something completely different, about mortgage fraud? Are you looking to get him on something other than Russia collusion?
Speaker 6:Well, I'm saying that there's a referral from the, from Bill Pulte, about a mortgage fraud, about Adam Schiff. That's publicly discussed. His own lawyers have been out there. Now there's more on Adam Schiff and all we're going to do again is get to the facts of this and use all the tools that we have in our system. What we've discovered and I know you want to ask me about some of this in the weaponization is that Joe Biden's Justice Department actively targeted American citizens Catholics who went to mass, parents who went to school boards, people who were involved in the Russia. You know, I hear from Carter Page every now and then. Carter Page was destroyed by the Russia hoax and we're sitting around and pretending it's OK to say that. You know there was a secret meeting on December 9th 2016 in the Situation Room where they plotted the Russia hoax and then we're going to say, oh, that was really bad. No, it wasn't really bad. It needs to be held accountable in every way we can.
Speaker 19:Well, you went to Letitia James's home. This week you were in New York.
Speaker 6:Yeah, look, I'm a prosecutor and when I do these cases I was in New York actually New Jersey for some meetings and I went over to New York for another meeting and I went by there. One of the referrals is about that property that she has. It's a very prominent neighborhood in Brooklyn and I wanted to lay eyes on it. I think most people if you're prosecuting something, you're careful. I didn't go there and announce it. Some woman came storming up and shooting video and talking to me, but I wanted to see the property and there's a number of other aspects of these cases where you've got to get a sense of what is actually at stake.
Speaker 19:Do you have a grand jury in these cases?
Speaker 6:Let me say, when you get a criminal referral, one of the tools you have is a grand jury, and I'll leave it to you to infer what I mean. But, uh, these referrals are criminal referrals significant enough that, um, that they would warrant using all the tools, and the tools include subpoenas and witnesses. Uh, and that's the that is in our system. That is the system. I'm not like jack smith.
Speaker 2:Jack smith like to talk about how he did think dude, they're going down, bro, they're going down, bro, they're going down. They're going down for mortgage fraud. I'm just saying he shows up on site. You got to take a look at what's at risk here. What is what's the actual thing that they were refining? You know, is this a real personal residence, dude? And I got all the tools.
Speaker 6:You can infer what you want and what he did and brag about Leticia James did. By the way, as a prosecutor, she liked to come out and hold press conferences. I'll just tell you when you get a criminal referral and her own lawyer made the comments publicly, you can infer what you need to.
Speaker 19:Well, let's talk about January 6th, because you are also investigating January 6th, which was also part of this. 10 years of scandals what have you learned?
Speaker 6:Well, again, attorney General Pam Bondi, let us loose on this. And there's a group of us working on January 6th. What we've learned is that the federal government, the Department of Justice, but other aspects targeted these citizens. They basically turned government on to make the hoax work. So I'm not talking about somebody that pushes a cop. That's a charge you can look at in charge. I'm talking about that. The FBI and others were putting American citizens on terrorism watch lists. They were auditing their IRS tax returns. They were targeting the American people. They were taking massive amounts of resources and moving them from fighting you know, child trafficking and fighting.
Speaker 2:My first prosecutor was a sex crime prosecutor. Moved over to charge January 6th.
Speaker 6:Real corruption and saying we have to move everybody to look at the capital siege. It was a political hoax that was driven by garland, lisa monaco and others, and what, again, attorney general bonnie has said is get to the bottom of it. Some of it may not be illegal, but it's some of the worst you know in in in federal prosecutor world. We think about the importance of that role. This guy named ro, guy named Robert Jackson, who is the prosecutor guy. What you see is Lisa Monaco's Justice Department acting in ways we've never seen before, and when we show all that and we're writing reports regularly on it, it's not one aspect.
Speaker 6:The federal court system was used in a way. The jails were used in a way to punish people. It's foreign. They didn't do this to the terrorists after 9-11, and they were doing it to American citizens. So that's a fulsome investigation on January 6th and it will make clear the hoax, which is really the 2020 election hoax. We were told we couldn't talk about it because of January 6th and the whole thing has fallen apart Maria, and it's going to get to the bottom and the players are always the same. It's always the same, the same people. On December 9th 2016, in the Situation Room in Obama's White House are playing the same game all these years.
Speaker 19:That's unbelievable, Real quick. What about the January 6th committee? Did they destroy evidence?
Speaker 6:Is there criminality there Of course, we're all in that too and, trust me, a lot of people did not get a pardon that were involved in the select committee, and they ought to be keeping an eye on their mailbox because there's a lot to be asked about and the pardons that were given out were done by an auto pen.
Speaker 19:Are they legitimate?
Speaker 6:Well, I'm the pardon attorney, so I have, I'm in that too. I can tell you we're investigating how the pardons were granted. It was not like anything in the history of America what Joe Biden not Joe Biden his staffers did not just with the auto pen, but with faking him out on the memos. More to come, maria. I'm telling you, pam Bondi has let us loose, and when this comes out, it'll take the whole of these people's hoaxes down. And we're doing it bit by bit, and it's fantastic, it's a great privilege.
Speaker 2:Unbelievable and I, at this point, trust Ed Martin. He might get stopped, he might get big footed. At some point they might shut him down, but as of right now he's connecting all the dots.
Speaker 1:I love it, the right word.
Speaker 2:Yeah, Saying the right words. January 6th was a hoax. It was a cover up of the 2020. Yes, I know, I know. And Lisa Monaco he brings up that name again. That's the name I brought up. Like this name has been connected, you know, all the way from being Obama's fixer to being in that meeting to being literally on the leadership team that was deciding whether or not I got remanded. That's a?
Speaker 2:that's a big deal, man. It's personal. All right, last video, and then we're going to wrap it up. This is the Democrat Party as founded by Andrew Jackson, who, by the way, not a bad dude.
Speaker 16:What up America? It's Andrew Jackson, that guy you roll up to hit some powder. I founded the Democrat Party and chose the jackass as our mascot. Now, as you can probably tell, times have changed a bit. From the party back in my day and present day Democrats will come to hate me, but that's your problem. Jackson started the Democrat Party to appeal to the common man. Democrats today sometimes give him credit for that, but only after calling him an evil white bigot. Needless to say, the party started off pretty sketchy by today's standards. We were by far the pro-slavery party all the way through the Civil War. After the war we cleaned up our act and supported the North's reconstruction efforts, totally kidding. We doubled down on racism and became the party of the Klan. But seriously, we didn't have much of a platform after the war except Jim Crow. But that was until our boy came in hot on his rollerblades. Then came the depression. People lost trust in markets, so I wheeled in to drastically expand communism across the country and democrats been hooked ever since.
Speaker 13:Up until this point, blacks had always voted republican, as they were the party that freed the slaves. But after fdr's new deal, blacks swung 75 democrat. This was a complete realignment, not because of civil rights but because of economics, all while the democrats were still the party of the.
Speaker 16:Klan, and their stronghold was the South. We pushed segregation throughout the South and filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act for 75 days. It wasn't until Republicans stepped up and found even more votes to pass the bill. So ask yourself, how are Democrats seen as the party of the civil rights?
Speaker 10:Well, it's because Democrats are very persuasive, but again it ultimately boils down to economic. Once Democrats realize the power of government spending and handouts, you can appeal to any voter group and lock them in One, two three Games for Palestine. Good luck with that.
Speaker 16:So, anyway, to sum it all up, my party has changed a shit ton, but it's not because of the mythical party switch. Democrats controlled the South all the way through the 1990s, but they did adopt new policies like massive social spending and welfare programs that allowed them to appeal to more diverse voting groups.
Speaker 2:I just thought that was pretty funny. I was like that's a pretty good breakdown. I just thought that was pretty funny. I was like that's a pretty good breakdown. One of the things there was a phone call between Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King's dad. When Martin Luther King got thrown in prison he'd become a real champion of blacks and rights and he was constantly getting thrown in prison or thrown in jail and one time when he was in jail, rfk or call RFK senior called Martin Luther King's dad and said what can I do for you? Anything we can do. And that changed the vote for blacks from Republican to Democrat. It was that thing alone. It was RFK reaching out. Which RFK and JFK were not your normal traditional Democrats. They were to the Democrat Party, what trump is to the republican party? Right, right they were.
Speaker 2:they were disruptors they were democrats, but they were not those democrats. Also why they were killed. Yes, that's a great analogy. The kennedys were to the democrat party what trump is to the republican party. He was a disruptor, he was going to change the trajectory of the party and that is why the vote switched because the democrats were willing to support martin luther king in order to win elections right, and probably because I think rfk and jfk sympathized very much with the cause. But at at this. But the party used it for votes. It's that simple. And then that just became benefits, right, paying for jobs, paying for votes, that kind of thing.
Speaker 2:I remember sitting in prison one time and I was waiting for some type of doctor's visit that I had to do. So I was sitting in this little you know cell waiting room and there were two other black guys there, and this was pre-election. So, of course, the news is on in the TV and this was kind of a cool little waiting room. It had an aquarium and a TV and bars. Keep us in bars, but give us glass and entertainment. This is awesome. So we're watching the news and it's you know, campaign stuff.
Speaker 2:Kamala said this, trump said that, blah, blah, blah. And the two guys are sitting there. Like you know, always voted Democrat, I've always voted Democrat. My mom told me, you know, the Democrats gave us civil rights and gave us the right to vote which was not accurate, but whatever and so we owed him that vote and he just, even if you got a thumb your nose, you got to vote Democrat. He's saying this I'm overhearing this very clearly and then he goes. But you know, it's just, things have changed and sometimes you just you just got to make a decision, man, and I don't know, I think a lot of brothers are going to be making a decision to vote for Trump. That was, that was a conversation. He didn't say he was going to. He didn't say anything like that, but he was just looking at it like I think a lot of people are changing their mind and I could definitely, and the population generally supports Donald Trump minorities included.
Speaker 2:So all right, guys. That's it for the show today. Thank you for joining us, especially those of you who stuck around to the very end of Rumble Private. So that's awesome. Thank you so much and we will talk to you guys again tomorrow.
Speaker 4:Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. We didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked what? I object to it. They automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am King, oh King, I very nice. How king, eh Very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress. There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do?
Speaker 18:you do. How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that King of the who? I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that King of the who? The Britons, who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king.
Speaker 4:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 18:If only people would Please, please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your?
Speaker 4:lord. We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Speaker 4:Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is?
Speaker 4:I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how did you become king then? The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king.
Speaker 4:Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Oh, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed. Bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? Bang, no-transcript.
