When Healthcare, Elections, And Security Ops Intersect, Who Holds The Line?

A quiet market check turns into a hard pivot: what if the most explosive element of January 6 wasn’t explosive at all? We trace new reporting that uses gait analysis to identify a possible pipe bomber, weigh the odds of a 94% match, and press into the central dilemma—if the devices were real, why was the response so casual; if they were inert, who staged them and why. That single question pulls in agency silence, whistleblower briefs headed to Congress, and the ways media editing can lock a narrative long before the facts land.

From the Capitol to the campus, we widen the frame. Berkeley’s violence, an arrest that targeted the victim, and a familiar pattern of institutions punishing the wrong people raise a deeper concern about selective enforcement. The timeline then moves through Seattle’s election anxieties—late ballot surges, curing questions, and missing officials—illustrating how confidence frays when processes feel opaque. Along the way, we dig into claims of debanking tied to Operation Arctic Frost, what it means when banks and prosecutors align, and how quickly financial levers can silence movements without a single courtroom ruling.

Threaded through all of it is an argument about incentive design. When subsidies flow to insurers instead of individuals, when investigations avoid sensitive lanes, when agencies decline to clarify basic facts, power consolidates where accountability is weakest. We connect the dots—J6 bomb claims, whistleblowers, university liability, election trust, and healthcare economics—not to force a grand theory, but to show how each piece amplifies the next. If you care about civil liberties, transparent policing, credible elections, and policy that serves people over institutions, this conversation gives you a map and the questions that still need answers.

If this resonated, share it with a friend, subscribe for the next deep dive, and leave a review with the one question you most want answered next.

Chapters

• 0:58 Opening Banter And Market Check
• 2:00 Pivot To J6: Pipe Bomb Lead-Up
• 4:20 Alleged Bomber ID And Gait Analysis Debate
• 9:10 Were The Bombs Real Or Training Devices?
• 13:30 Whistleblowers, Massey, And Media Narratives
• 17:05 Officer Fanone, Policing, And Politics
• 22:30 Secret Service Subpoenas And Intel Bottlenecks
• 24:20 Berkeley Violence And Policing Response
• 28:20 Antifa, Accountability, And University Liability
• 32:10 Seattle Election Irregularities Alleged
• 37:40 Officials Abroad During Vote Counting
• 40:20 From UK Turmoil To U.S. Institutional Trust
• 43:20 Trump, Visas, And Practical Constraints
• 47:00 BBC Editing Claims And Russiagate Linkages
• 52:00 Clintons, Five Eyes, And Shelved Probes
• 56:00 Operation Arctic Frost And Debanking
• 1:01:00 Health Care As The Central Motive

Transcript

SPEAKER_07: 0:58

You see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. What are those people? What are those people? Good morning, peasants. Welcome to a new episode of the Peasants Perspective Carlis! You beat Pony Boy to the chat. Y'all. Good morning, Pony Boy, everybody. Welcome, welcome. Checking in on silver today. Bitcoin's high. Bitcoin's at 104.814 at this second. That's awesome. Silver spot is up 8.73% this week. Bet$52. Just to remind everybody, it was$450 when I graduated. I was telling my wife last night, I was like, remember when we made all that money, right when we got out of college? If we'd have bought just a small amount of silver, 10x. Anyways, that's where that$10,000 investment finally comes to pay off. You know,$10,000 in silver is just$100,000 today. It's stunning when you consider that against your fiat dollar and your purchaseability. Anyways. Well, let's continue on with this J6 story because this thing has been sucking up my life for the last half decade. So just for a recap, right? The whole our audience is familiar with the J6 saga for the most part. But recently in the last week, last Friday, Steve Baker, a fellow J6 defendant, who was a journalist prior to this, like full on, this is his whole career, his whole life, is nothing but write articles. And he got arrested, walked in through a door next door to next to a New York Times journalist, and he ended up getting arrested. The New York Times or journalists didn't get arrested. Long story, he got uh he's been investigating J6 basically ever since then, because what he saw on the ground was not what he was seeing on TV, and he had an inside track on it. Well, another agent, FBI agent named Kyle Seraphim, was with the FBI on January 6th in the DC area, and he was assigned to go look and find the pipe bomber. And they were staking out the house next door to the alleged pipe bomber now because in her backpack allegedly was a transit smart card that was pinging and led to that place. So they had three persons of interest, her being one, this guy with the card being one, who they didn't think was the person because his physical stature doesn't match the person in the video. So then it was a matter of okay, why does he have why does this smaller person have the smart card in her trunk? He's military intelligence. She's now the CIA, right? The whole thing's just a debacle. So on top, so the report came out on Friday, DOJ and FBI sat silent. Then into this week, Monday, Tuesday, they've sat silent.

SPEAKER_11: 3:40

Okay.

SPEAKER_07: 3:41

They've gone, Ed Martin has gone on a few interviews, hasn't said much. He's kind of just like, we're looking into stuff, has not addressed the allegations directly at all. So now there's kind of this thought amongst some reporters who are friendly to us, Julie Kelly and others, that this is an op, that they're trying to, you know, smear the FBI now that's doing all this good work, taking bad guys off our street. Do you smell a funny story here? A funny theme? Like no matter who the enemy is, the FBI always have to be the good guys, right? And so now all of a sudden it's like, okay, well, another whistleblower, not Kyle Serafim, who's currently with the FBI, stepped forward, basically saying he has inside information that this was covered up, in fact, and has released this to Thomas Massey, who plans on bringing the whistleblower report public. So I guess it's an 11-page whistleblower report. Immediately, now everybody here knows my issues with Thomas Massey, right? But immediately as Thomas Massey does this, Julie Kelly starts questioning oh, isn't it interesting though? The whistleblower went to Massey instead of Thomas Chuck Grassley. This smells like an op. They're trying to derail the investigation over. Okay, so this is Grant Stitchfield on Real America's Voice, basically going over this saga and where we're at today. Maybe it offers out. I like Grant Stitchfield. He got fired from Newsmax for, in my opinion, no good reason.

SPEAKER_14: 5:05

Um talking about the J6 cover-up. Specifically, what role did the FBI play? The Capitol Police, the CIA, our own government. It appears to me they were in on much of it. A setup job to sink President Trump and any future run for the presidency. It is a story that is filled with government lies. And now we have more proof that deep state vipers will do anything to hold on to their unfettered power. Do you remember the two pipe bombs that were found outside the DNC and RNC headquarters? The pipe bomber caught on tape there. It shut down the counting of the Electoral College votes. I always believed it was a phony deal. It was a concocted crime to incriminate MAGA Republicans falsely. Well, the Blaze, along with the Gateway pundit, is reporting that the J6 pipe bomber could be a former Capitol police officer, now termed CIA security officer. Her name, according to these outlets, is Shawnee Kirkoff. Blaze investigative reporters claim to have concluded her identity, writing this in The Blaze quote, a software algorithm that analyzes walking parameters including flexion, knee bend, hip extension, speed, step length, cadence, and variance rated Shawnee Ray Kirchhoff 31 of Alexandria, Virginia as a 94% match to the bomb suspect shown on video January 5th, 2021.

SPEAKER_07: 6:51

I saw Grok do the math on this particular thing. So to have someone identified by AI gate analysis as a pretty good, you know, it's like 90% gonna get you. Pretty significant. And then it said, okay, analyze that compared to what are the odds that somebody that would be accidentally matched, right, in the broader populace. So of all the people in the world, there's seven or eight other people that have her walk, or maybe 10,000 other people or whatever you know number is, that AI would go, you guys all have the same gate. What are the odds? Because that's spread across the planet, right? What are the odds that somebody with that odds would live in DC around J6, just living in DC around J6, and all of a sudden the odds go down to like single digits? It's like less, you know, like 1%, 2%, that two people with the same gate are even live in DC, right?

SPEAKER_10: 7:43

Less than 1%, I'm sure.

SPEAKER_07: 7:44

Yeah. So then it goes, what are the odds that they would be a mistaken identity, live in DC, and live next door to, you know, and it kind of goes down this thing. It's like one in gajillion billion. Yeah, no odds. The idea that they've identified her with the gate match, you know, was around the Capitol on J6, tracked her down to the was a person.

SPEAKER_10: 8:06

This this whole stuff about 94%. It's a lot of people go, well, that leaves a lot of room open for something. Dude, in the world of statistics, 94% match in this in this arena is like a hundred percent.

SPEAKER_07: 8:19

It's 94% across the billion people they've got us. You know, it's like this is not a small number.

SPEAKER_10: 8:26

It's at least worth bringing somebody in to talk to them.

SPEAKER_07: 8:29

Yeah, and I would say they're Osama bin Laden was based on gate analysis for satellites 16 years ago.

SPEAKER_14: 8:37

Veteran analyst who ran the analysis for Blaze News said that based on visual observations, the program can struggle with. He personally pegged the match at closer to 98%. There you go. Kirkoff's name, as you can imagine, has since gone viral. So let me be clear. I never believed the bombs were real. You saw Secret Service walking around there.

SPEAKER_07: 9:04

There was no real I want to fill this in. There is a huge debate now. You have one agency that said the pipe bombs were real, operable, thus creating the threat to Kamala Harris's life. That sounds fine until you start going, but the Secret Service swept it, and it was swept again earlier than that. And you guys all missed explosives?

SPEAKER_10: 9:26

These drug dogs, or these explosive dogs missed an explosive sitting feet away from where they're acne bomb in a freaking wily coyote cartoon.

SPEAKER_07: 9:38

Well, then you get when they found the bomb, they're standing around, they let a school bus come back, kids walking by, they're just kind of like, Well, we're waiting for more. No, no, no. That's what you do when you find a bomb, you just hang out. If it's active, you're clearing the area. Instead of hanging out staring at it, like, yeah, we I don't know. That egg primer hasn't dinged yet. You think the tacos are done? So it's completely so, but that requires the bomb to be real. So part of Julie Kelly's reporting, and this is where it gets significant. Julie Kelly's reporting has led us to a place to believe that the pipe bomb was not planted on January 5th by this person in the dark, but was planted by someone in the early morning of January 6th. Change of narrative. After the Secret Service did their sweep, somebody came in and slipped the pipe bomb in or something, right? No evidence supporting that, other than it can't be live and be checked and have a 14-hour window with a one-hour timer with 20 minutes left on it.

SPEAKER_10: 10:33

In that video that we watched of somebody just walking around doing something, nobody knows what, and must just be a figment of our imagination.

SPEAKER_07: 10:40

Well, again, the thought was maybe that was an opt to distract us from the early morning six planter. But now we're going the other way because what's happening is Massey and other whistleblowers have said that bomb wasn't explosive, it was inert, it was a training bomb. And this is what Bon Gino implied for years now, saying that the story cover-up, the cover-up story, is going to be it was a training exercise. They were doing a training exercise. It was misunderstood. Well, here's the problem with that. You knew it was a training exercise when it happened, and you definitely knew it was a training exercise by the time you got to what was it, November 17th, 2023? Why? Because I was sitting on trial life and a lot of time in prison, right? My life was on the line there. And the chief of police said we had a security incident and had to respond. So if you knew it was a training incident and someone called in an inert pipe bomb, would you deploy your capital police to go deal with the fake inert training pipe bomb? No, you wouldn't. They needed it to be real in order to justify the response. But what if it was fake and planted on the fifth? Now you're deep into this was an operation to do it territory, and there was an operation to deflect from it territory. So that's where this new reporting makes everything the FBI's put out and what Julie Kelly's reporting become negated. Where are you getting those leads? You're putting it together. Now, those are great leads to chase down because she's asking a lot of questions that are right. Why was it found by a Capitol Hill police officer? Planted by one and found by one, the whole thing, right? She raises a lot of questions too that are totally valid, but it boils down from everything I can tell. Did the pipe bomb was it inert or was it not? If it was inert, then this is all a setup, and everybody knew it. If it's real, then you guys have misled us for multiple years looking for a man in the dark, and you way under-treated this situation when you actually responded. And it's still a setup.

SPEAKER_14: 12:43

And it's still a setup. Sense of urgency once they found the bombs. And here's what I don't think. I don't think Kirkhoff went rogue. I think this was part of her job. I think she was ordered to do it, but this is only my assessment.

SPEAKER_00: 13:00

Darren Beatty and I have uncovered the most uh information, evidence, shady circumstances related to the pipe bombers, both at the DNC and RNC. But what Darren always said is if you expose the truth about the pipe bombs, the entire January 6th narrative unravels.

SPEAKER_14: 13:22

All right, so that's Joey Kelly on with Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon. And you know Darren Beattie from this program, who's been a great friend of exposing a lot of the irregularity surrounding this, is now working inside the Department of Justice. That's a good thing. Then I saw this tweet from Congressman Thomas Massey. Quote, America is waking up today to learn that the Capitol Police turned CIA orchestrated the pipe bombs on January 6th, and the FBI has covered it up for over four years. I questioned FBI Director Ray, ATF Director Dedelbach, and FBI Assistant Director over DC, DeAntonio, under oath, all played dumb. No surprise there. So the question is, what will Cash Patel's FBI do about this new information? Well-known attorney Ed Morton said this on the Benny Show.

SPEAKER_06: 14:17

I talked to Bangino over the weekend, and he said, Look, you we are in this completely, and and it's not off the radar. This is not something that um anybody should think is out of the uh off of you know, uh anybody. And and you know, Dan and I know each other for a long time. Uh to hear him say it, I know exactly what he means. And so I'm confident that we're making progress.

SPEAKER_07: 14:39

We played that clip yesterday, and Ed Martin kind of said nothing. Oh, we're still looking into it.

SPEAKER_14: 14:45

Well, I'm personal friends with both Dan Bongino and Cash Patel, and I can promise you that if they have this information, they will investigate it. Both of them were committed to getting to the bottom of all of this.

SPEAKER_07: 14:57

Yeah, it is committed to getting the bottom of the important thing. They've been saying that for years. They literally made millions of dollars between the two of them talking about J6. Now the ball's in your court. So my hope is that background in the quiet, they're getting the on this. That there's no point in making a press release because there's gonna be an arrest. And you don't make a press release before an arrest. That's my hope. My sincere hope. Now, this gentleman right here is Michael Fanone. Michael Fanon was one of the officers on January 6th. And uh, I gotta say this. This is something, you know, I grew up, I abstained from getting tattoos and piercing my ears and dyeing my hair because I had this idea that you wanted to look classy, you wanted to look responsible and authoritative. And when I grew up, cops didn't have tattoos, cops had clean-cut hair. Cops, you know, well, now it's crazy because every time I get arrested, just more than once now, the cops are covered in tattoos. And when I went to prison, you couldn't tell the difference other than the uniform between the inmates and the cops. They're covered in tattoos. This guy's got gang-related tattoos all over his body, but he was in law enforcement for 20 years, hitting doing narcotics, which I don't know if he wasn't undercover or what the deal is, but he's got a tattoo on the top of his hand that says, I'll take the money. That's a total drug thing. I'll take the money, right? That's like it makes no sense. He's got a big spider web on his neck. Spider webs indicate prison time. Now he's clearly probably never been to prison, but why does he have a spider web? I know in prison, if you get a spider web and haven't done the years, it's a problem. You see people with spider webs on their elbows and they're like, you know, young and whatever, like they're working out at the gym, they've never been to prison. Those are posers. Really, it's it's line per year. Okay. And if you go to prison, you got a spider web you didn't earn, they'll take it off you. So, anyways, this is Michael Fanone, and he's real sad because you know, he dedicated his whole life to law enforcement, but now he can't get any help. And I want to break down how this happens to someone who might have been a good, honest broker of truth and a law enforcement officer who decides to get political.

SPEAKER_09: 17:02

No, I hope no American has to experience what I've experienced in that uh I've gone from dedicating 20 years of my life to the profession of law enforcement uh only to become a victim uh of the Department of Justice and of our criminal justice system and see and have nowhere to seek relief. Um, you know, I don't call the police anymore uh when I'm threatened or antagonized because I know that they're not gonna do anything.

SPEAKER_07: 17:30

He is a prime candidate to join a gang. But I think at the end of the day, well, you're on this side of the tracks now. You can't call the cops for help. You gotta call someone else. Well, I'm called Michael.

SPEAKER_10: 17:40

Welcome to He could probably join our podcast.

SPEAKER_07: 17:42

Yeah, welcome to our side of the table. I I'm not super reticent to call the cops for anything either. I've kind of been through the system.

SPEAKER_09: 17:50

They have said as much. I mean, I've reported French to the FBI, nothing, absolutely nothing. Uh, and so I don't depend on the criminal justice system in this country to keep me and my family safe.

SPEAKER_07: 18:02

So that's vigilante talk.

SPEAKER_09: 18:04

So that's the the first component. Um, you know, the second one is that you know, the rewriting of the history.

SPEAKER_07: 18:11

Okay, so here's where now we're getting political. I sympathize with him. You took, you know, you testified, took a stand, people hate it. I get it. If you stood for truth and you get persecuted, you're one of Christs. Yeah, that's kind of how it works. But this man went political because it wasn't just reporting on what happened, it wasn't just saying, hey, the Capitol got attacked. That's fair. If you're a Capitol Hill police officer, regular law enforcement officer frontline, you got attacked. Uh that's fair enough. You got beef. That's why I hold nothing against the officers that testified against me. I asked if I hurt harm in your threatened, and I apologized, and that was it. Right? Why? Because the beef isn't with them, it was with the politicians inside. Okay, these guys got attacked, but what he did was he ascribed intent to the crowd. He didn't see that they're just here doing this. He said they're here to be terrorists, to overthrow the government. He put intention on the crowd and became political, and that's why he's lost support from either side. Nobody likes someone who doesn't stand for truth and is all politics, because as soon as the wind changes, you're left adrift with nothing in your sails.

SPEAKER_09: 19:23

Uh painting me as the perpetrator as the villain, painting, you know, other police officers as the villain.

SPEAKER_07: 19:29

And see, you cash the checks you write, you cashed the rioters as the villain rather than also being a co-victim to you, right? You cast them as the villain, and now you're cast cash cashing the check of being the villain yourself. You're reaping what you sowed. That's that's the thing I really try hard not to do. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt. I try to cast a cloak of charity, I try to understand before I seek to be understood, right? I try I really do, really do try hard. I could, you know, we'd probably be a bigger show. I was listening to some show, guy was just, it was Ari Hoffman. He was ranting and ranting, and I was like, I thought that was inappropriate for like AM radio. I was like, maybe we would be bigger if I just gave in to my inclinations to just rip it, but I don't want to cash those checks.

SPEAKER_09: 20:23

He's cashing the checks. Painting the insurrectionists, uh the traitors to this country as the heroes in the story, uh, allows more people to feel um that it's okay to threaten me, to threaten members of my family.

SPEAKER_07: 20:38

See, that's what you did. You did that, you you painted demonstration.

SPEAKER_10: 20:43

Well, in the breath right before that, he was saying he was saying he was reiterating that they were the bad guys.

SPEAKER_07: 20:50

Yes, you got four years to sit in the seat, your buddy Harry Dunn ran for Congress, you get to go with Kathy Griffin and go to these parties. We've seen you. We know that you've become a Hollywood guy now, and you like to hang out with that upper left, crusty, Rosie O'Donnell, Kathy Griffin crowd, right?

SPEAKER_10: 21:07

This doesn't feel like any kind of repentance or anything.

SPEAKER_07: 21:10

But all of a sudden, now you're not the hero. What have I said, Ron? I've been the hero and the villain. Before I went to prison, people hated me. I had to get rid of my wife's gotten horrible threats on her Facebook accounts. We have to change her name, right? I was that villain. Now I go to these events, I get standing ovations. Oh, a hero. Listen, I didn't paint myself as a hero when you called me a villain, and I'm not going to paint myself as a villain when you call me a hero. I'm just Taylor. I'm just trying to do my thing here, right? I'm trying to stand for truth to the extent I can. We're only as good as the information we have. We're often wrong, but we're never in doubt. But when we get new information, we will change our opinion. He was not an honest broker of his experience, right? He wanted to be the hero. He liked the cameras. He likes, he's on MSNBC complaining. Oh, you don't have help. Put out your gifts and go. You'll fill it up.

SPEAKER_09: 22:00

And to direct uh violent, hate-filled acts at us and feel justified in doing so because Donald Trump and the Republican Party says that that's okay because he's a villain, he's a traitor.

SPEAKER_07: 22:14

Yeah. Violent, hate-filled acts. Were they? Or were they just reactions to the fact that you, Michael Flanone, were unaware that there was a dead woman feet away from you and you went out to crack some skulls when they were just trying to get help, right? That's the situation. He was never an honest broker. He wanted the spotlight. So the other thing, too, that's going on now for the first time is uh the House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed the Secret Service detail of Kamala Harris, specifically to ask her questions about why she went to the DNC in the middle of the certification of the election. That'll be interesting. Questions that have not yet been answered. So we'll see how that comes out. Now, yesterday, you were ahead of the curve, people. We were ahead of the curve. I was ahead of the curve by about four years, but you got a little bit ahead of the story. We talked about this lady, Yoga Nanda Pittman. And I did find out she wasn't the interim capital police chief. She was in charge of the intelligence that day. She became the interim capital chiefs police when Sund left just right after J6. So she got promoted. Oh. And then the police union said vote of no confidence, and then she ended up in Berkeley. So this is coming from at Proud Army Mom66. Somebody that's listening should tag her on X so she knows we're covering her on the Facebook. Maybe we can make a listener out of her. Former Capitol Police Officer Tarek Johnson, who was suspended for donning a MAGA hat during the Capitol Six riot. He put the hat on to try to chill the temperature. Hey, look, we're all good. Like, you know, it's not about politics, but you guys got to clear the space. I got my MAGA hat on, okay? He now joins Glenn to tell the rest of the story and to and it revolves around former acting police chief Yogananda Pittman, this woman right here. Johnson lays out why he believes Pittman, who at the time oversaw intelligence for the Capitol Police. What does Officer Sun say? We had intelligence, but it didn't get passed on and we couldn't respond appropriately because she was the bottleneck. She was the one holding on to that information. Must have held back evidence from then Chief Stephen Sund, only to be rewarded with a high-paying job in Nancy Pelosi's district. January 6th cannot happen without permission, Johnson argues. He was a cop that day. He explains why Capitol Police has a big issue with whistleblower protection and why he believes another investigation is needed. And you can listen to the story on Glenn Beck. So, Yogananda Pittman. Now she's out in Berkeley. This happened two days ago in Berkeley. A far this is the riot that we kind of showed a couple of a clip from yesterday. A Muslim far-left extremist severely beat a TP USA attendee on the face after robbing him at UC Berkeley has been identified as G as Jihad. Now there's a there's a video of all of this. They had a drone in the air. So what happened was this guy came up. Right. So he walks up here. Here he comes. Okay. And he rips the guy's stuff. He takes, oh, it was right there. He took his chain, he took his cross off. Okay. He ripped his cross off. So this guy's retrieving his property. He'd just been burglarized. And look at this. He just gets beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten, beaten. So, as response to this, Yogananda Pittman's officer, here's the Muslim man who did that. Okay. He gets detained but released. But who really gets arrested is this guy, the one with the freedom shirt who got the sh beat out of him. He got arrested and thrown in the slammer for the night. Okay. So that's Yoga Nanda Pittman's police department right here. Right here. Yogananda Pittman's police department right here. For the second time in half a decade, you have weaponized your department against the conservatives. The victims in this particular case, all on camera. Of course, they didn't review the camera before they made arrests. So now it's up to this guy to go figure it out in the court system. Meanwhile, the Muslim guy walks free. Now, how did this happen at Berkeley? How did this happen? This is a university. Berkeley's got a little bit of a problem. Obviously, as regards the riot, Pam Attorney General Pam Bonnie posted this. Antifa is an existential threat to our nation. The violent riots at UC Berkeley last night are under full investigation by the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force. Ah, those are the same guys who came after me. We will continue to spare no expense on masking all who commit and orchestrate acts of political violence. Under President Trump's leadership in pursuit of his executive order, designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, the Department of Justice and our law enforcement partners are dismantling violent networks that seek to intimidate Americans to suppress free expression and First Amendment rights. Awesome. However, anybody knows this. When you're going after an army, when you take out all the privates, you haven't really knocked out the army. May have slowed him down a little bit, but you got some corporals to fill in and, you know, you got some people there. If you really want to knock out an army, you can pretty much do it by hitting the general. You get the general, the whole people, who's paying paychecks? You know what I mean? Like it's a problem. So it's one thing to go after the individual rioters. It's another thing to go after the people who funded it and the university who hosted it. So this is Harmie Dillon talking to Laura Ingram about just that.

SPEAKER_21: 26:53

First of all, it's fantastic to have you on the show tonight. Thank you for joining us. Uh, UC Berkeley has condemned the violence, promises to take appropriate measures, I guess, against those who violated campus rules. But is that enough?

SPEAKER_12: 27:07

Well, Laura, thanks for having me so much. It's a pleasure to be here. Uh, this feels to me like deja vu all over again. I think it was like eight years ago that I came on your show and talked about suing UC Berkeley for exactly this type of violent chaos that happened on the campus. And at that time, Berkeley was preventing conservative groups from having conservative speakers and then exposing them, if anyone ever came, to this type of violence. I sued them, I want a settlement, and Berkeley agreed to protect uh the uh guests of conservative speakers. And yet here we are. They seem, as Savannah mentioned, to be completely unprepared. The Berkeley uh, you know, local police as well seem to be unprepared, undermanned. They treat it as if it's a both sides problem. It is not a both sides problem. Uh when a violent mob like Antifa comes and attacks like this, it's what we call a heckler's veto in First Amendment jurisprudence. And given the fact that there has now been a terrorist designation here, the Joint Terrorism Task Force is going to be looking into this together with the DOJ, my civil rights division, and the FBI and understand what happened here. How did it come to be the case that when Berkeley has notice that this type of violence occurs on the campus when conservative speakers come to speak, and by Rob Schneider had been scheduled to speak, it was a sold-out crowd of 2,000 people, and less than a thousand people were there in the stadium because people were intimidated by this violence. So this is not a consequence-free situation. Berkeley has announced, oh, we're so happy that a thousand people came to hear this. That is not the whole story. The story is that when Sonia Sotomayor comes to speak, when the Dulai Lama comes to speak, the Berkeley campus somehow is able to protect the speaker and all of the people who attend. And when it's a conservative speaker, it isn't. So we have some serious questions and concerns about this, and there'll be a full federal investigation. We've already sent two letters to Berkeley and to the police to preserve their documents so we understand how we came to this horrific situation to make sure it never happens again at UC.

SPEAKER_07: 29:03

You know, one of the things that uh Dan Bongino used to say that I've repeated often is remember the names, remember the names, right? It's funny because I'm way worse. I'm not nearly as good at remembering the names as I used to be. Maybe it's just because, holy cow, I mean, how long do I have to remember John Carlin's name? It's like, at what point do you start going, you know, there's no conspiracies, but there's no coincidences? Why is it everywhere that this Capitol Hill police officer goes, Antifa follows and causes problems against conservatives? And then why does the local police department get weaponized against those conservatives? Right? You start to go, hmm, this sounds like a pattern. I mean, it'd be one thing if it was the Proud Boys that were in there being aggressive and she was coming after the Proud Boys and it was Antifa that was peacefully holding signs, you know, and just expressing their religion. That's not the case.

SPEAKER_10: 29:46

You know, I know Berkeley is supposed to be like the basting of this kind of nonsense where they're just always pushing back against the man and all that, but I wonder how Berkeley alumni really feel about this right now. I mean, are you proud of this? Really?

SPEAKER_07: 30:02

What generation? I mean, right. So Seattle, we just wrapped up our election. I know a lot of you thought the election was last week, but we just wrapped up ours. To those who think this is for the good, Eric, Erica, Pacific Northwest, to those who think the Seattle mayor race is a natural phenomenon. So we had an ex-football player and we had a communist running. The communist has never had a job. And the ex-football player, at least he's got some kind of you know, background. And this was admittedly kind of two not great candidates, but you had one clearly probably going to be competent to do the job of mayor, and then you had this communist who clearly is not going to be competent to do the job of mayor. Clearly. Okay. So let me, this is what she says. Mayor race is not a natural phenomenon. Our ballots get returned completely randomly. In Seattle, they just all go in together. We don't coordinate this, even if we tried. The data had zero signs that we did because the majority are just random and it overwhelms any effort to coordinate because you can't ballot harvest. You can ballot harvest, but you can't, it's not by district. So you can't isolate what district the ballots are being counted in. There's no reason we should have any increase at the end like this due to the random return and counting of our mail in ballots because King does not sort them into districts first. And the size of the race, the votes should be evenly distributed for the most part. In small races, you see this kind of thing, but not when we are talking about 270,000 votes. That is contained within one county. She had 47% on election day. There is no reason she should be getting 60% of the votes still being counted. Don't tell me that you believe she can squeeze this out by curing ballots. There were not that many ballots that could be cured in Seattle. 2,300 was the highest I can find at any point. There's no way we should have all these votes. Even if they all did get cured, she should have like 47, 46%, like she did on election light. Random doesn't have spikes. They went from a peak curing ballots of 2,300 in King County to 2,007 270,000. Now, our local radio hosts, Jason Nance and Ari uh Hoffman have a little bit to say about this.

SPEAKER_10: 32:07

It would have been perfect. Come on, Jason.

SPEAKER_05: 32:09

Come on, man, talk. Speak, Jason. The idea that counting stops because it's the weekend or because, whoa, it's 4 30. That's the end of our day. That suggests that this critical office to protect democracy treats counting ballots like some routine administrative job rather than an urgent civic service. And that's how I view elections. And I imagine maybe you won't phrase it that way, but that's how you think of these things, right? This is an urgent civic service to actually count ballots as quickly as possible.

SPEAKER_07: 32:45

The idea that counting So they, you know, shut down counting over the weekend, close for the night. Meanwhile, every time they open up account, oh, we got another batch of ballots. Well, that's fine. It's like you had the whole night to reconcile.

SPEAKER_10: 32:57

Well, I was gonna tell you, they have not um certified the election yet, and they are still counting ballots right now to have another ballots. They announced another drop today. I don't know if you know that.

SPEAKER_07: 33:11

I hope the other guy's playing along. I hope he found some ballots on no quality or something.

SPEAKER_10: 33:16

Have you heard the latest? Um she went from a 91 vote lead to now, she's sitting at just over 1200 vote lead.

SPEAKER_07: 33:22

Of course. Pouring them in. In fact, I don't think he should ever concede, and I think they should just keep counting until they count more ballots than we have population. Why not? In fact, that was another thing that oh, where was it?

SPEAKER_10: 33:35

Uh um well, the whole story's gotten so ridiculous. They're already talking about doing a recount, but they can't tell you they're gonna do a recount until they certify the election, and they're not gonna certify the election until the 17th. Okay, okay, that's a whole other week.

SPEAKER_07: 33:51

This is critically important. This is so stupid. This is this is a critically important time for Washington election. Now, this isn't a two or four-year election, this is an off-cycle election, but it's important. This isn't the mayor of Seattle, okay? And you'd think in Washington, if you're involved in the election stuff, like you know, Secretary of State or whoever, that you would want to be around, you know, to hear the stuff.

SPEAKER_05: 34:10

You wouldn't want to be, say, on the other side of the planet, but our election officials were they spent about eighty thousand dollars in taxpayer funds for three people to attend a three-day festival or fair called the Spiel Board Game Fair. And yet they were in Germany for ten days to the tune of eighty thousand dollars. If I put all of my trips together, I wouldn't get close to one person's share of the eighty thousand, which is just insane to me. How could it cost that much? And why were they there for ten days? The actual fair was October twenty-third through the twenty-sixth. And yet they were there, they got there five days before the event, and they didn't land back in Washington until four days after the event.

SPEAKER_07: 35:04

But you can't explain three days on the back end and five days on the front end, they spent about they were nowhere to be found during the election because they were in Germany playing board games.

SPEAKER_10: 35:15

Okay. It's like the only freaking job you got. There's an election.

SPEAKER_07: 35:22

I know. They went to the board game thing in Germany. You re you realize it wasn't like but a couple years ago that the governor said no elected no officials can leave the state of Washington.

SPEAKER_10: 35:34

I wonder if there are any Nigerians there.

unknown: 35:39

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07: 35:39

So Ari Hoffman, he finally has come around. He's on our side of the fence, Ron. You know the last post they had?

SPEAKER_08: 35:46

It's election day. Get your ballots in. Katie Wilson's team has been working it and working it to cure those ballots, which means did your vote get counted? When King County elections, when David Croman from the Seattle Times says cured ballots are now coming in. What they come out of somebody's trunk? You have now made an election denier out of me because I don't believe this at all. That's like bogus nonsense.

SPEAKER_10: 36:16

When all of a sudden you're hearing from So while he's buffering, I'll also tell you.

SPEAKER_08: 36:21

There is no math. There's no predictability on this whatsoever. They are both terrible, terrible candidates. But the fact that Bruce Harrell is now losing by 91 votes, you're the last person.

SPEAKER_10: 36:36

So that was a couple of days ago when he was losing by 91 votes. But did you also hear there's a couple of real retard uh radio hosts here in Seattle, and they were having a really serious discussion about ballots that didn't make it and weren't um I'm sorry, and weren't um stamped in by the uh post office, and they were talking this real hard discussion about well, maybe people that um didn't get their ballots counted should be contacted so that we can talk to them. Oh man, this discussion went retarded so fast. So we've got to find these votes, man.

SPEAKER_07: 37:15

I know. This is the kind of stuff that's like it's like, hey, if the ballots are late, throw them in the trash. Shut up. So here's where we're gonna find out how deep the communism runs in Seattle. Right. Let's see how long Ari Hoffman has his show.

SPEAKER_13: 37:33

Right?

SPEAKER_07: 37:33

Oh, you're oh uh you've made an election denier, Remini. You're ranting, you spent hours just ranting about this completely fraudulent election. Four years ago, we went to prison for that shit. I'm just saying. So we're gonna see how much times have changed for four years, okay? Because four years ago, you were off the air now. The producer came in and hooked you. We're not questioning the system. The Biden's in charge, okay? Not doing it. Now, over in England, they're having their own storm going on. I guess Tier Starmer is losing support of his own cabinet. Um, Graham, Susan asks.

SPEAKER_02: 38:06

So all of this is very entertaining, all this sort of like what's going on in number 10. But Susan says, why is Kemi Bader not wasting time on Westminster gossip? She should be taking him to task of a mass illegal immigration and the cost of living. Was that a wasted opportunity? No one really cares about the staffers in number 10 Downing Street out there, do they?

SPEAKER_04: 38:23

Well, I think Kemi is smashing it week after week, isn't she, holding the government to account? And uh as she did that again today. And Keir Starman has lost control of the country, of the economy. Now it turns out he's at war with his own Downing Street, which he's in charge of. So he's condemning the words coming out of the Downing Street, which he controls. And it's that is at the heart of the dysfunction. If you can't even control your only people within that building, what hope have you of turning around and rebuilding trust with the British people? And people are talking about, exactly as the question suggests, about the fact that promises were made on not putting up tax. If I if I remember rightly, we don't need to increase taxes any further, and this is an absolute commitment. And there was a Labour voter in on Question Time in Sunderland last week, she said, How can I ever trust a word they say again if they break the word on that? So we've got a government that is out of control, it's breaking its promises, and Keir Starmer has so lost authority, he doesn't not only does he not have authority with his own MPs, he doesn't even have authority in his own 10 Downing Street.

SPEAKER_07: 39:31

How can so Graham State's out to get him? Or Keir Starmer's a good deep stater and the good guys are out to get him inside the cabinet, or this is just a classic example of gadgets robbers where the wicked slay the wicked.

SPEAKER_10: 39:44

I think it's funny that we were we're watching uh you know Britain news and we're like, ah, those guys and their leaders, and then how come they don't do anything about that? It's like, oh wait.

SPEAKER_07: 39:55

Oh well, yeah. We got safe. Trump doesn't have control of his own cabinet. See what Chris Ray was doing under Donald Trump.

SPEAKER_13: 40:04

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07: 40:05

No kidding. It just goes to show government is gonna do what government's gonna do, right? That I think that's one of the biggest revelations. When I was in call, I grew up very patriotic, right? I'm an Air Force brat, grew up overseas, Eagle Boy Scout, fully intended on joining the military, joined the ROTC, was gonna had a commission sitting on the desk waiting for me, right? And I said no. I said no, because I because of the war in the Middle East. And it wasn't because I wasn't willing to go and be deployed and fight. I was happy to do that. I wanted to do that, but for what reason? Right? What am I living my life for? Who am I living for? I'm living for the empire, but as I was studying political science, I'm like, well, I don't want to lay down my life for bankers and oil barons, you know what I mean? Fighting over long-held disputes and sand in the Middle East. So I turned it down, I walked away.

SPEAKER_10: 40:57

It wasn't like it wasn't the same feeling that you have as you think about why people fought for World War II.

SPEAKER_07: 41:04

No, not at all.

SPEAKER_10: 41:05

Right.

SPEAKER_07: 41:05

Right.

SPEAKER_10: 41:06

And so it's like I where that war felt like a righteous war.

SPEAKER_07: 41:11

In high in retrospect, yeah. And you know what? Had we prevailed in the Middle East, by why what I mean by that is like eliminating Islam or something crazy like that, then we would look back historically and go, oh, look how horrible they were. They abused their women and they did this. And we could justify any war because the winner writes the history.

SPEAKER_10: 41:29

I think that we could have been a lot more justified if we had burned the poppy fields.

SPEAKER_07: 41:34

Yeah. Listen, right? If Germany had won, we'd be reading textbooks about Japanese internments. Instead, it's a footnote. You know what I mean? Like, let's read. I mean, and not that they're comparable. What they were doing with the gypsy and Jew internment was completely different than what we were doing with the Japanese. But again, you can spin history any way you want to spin it. So Donald Trump sat down with Laura Ingram, and here's something that he said. And there was a lot of great clips in this, but this one right here is very controversial. And a lot of the impression for MAGA and the MAGA faithful is that Donald Trump is disappointing us, right? He's not doing what he said he was going to do. I actually don't really feel that way. I think Donald Trump is politicking in a big way. In fact, I went through his Truth Social feed, which I rarely go on to Truth Social to be completely honest. I usually wait for it to be reposted onto X. But I'm finding out more and more, there's not everything he posts is reposted on X. He posted a 17-minute video talking about taking out the insurance companies, all this stuff that was by one of these like random, you know, like us, like analyzers. And he's like, if you want to know 100% accurate what's happening, watch this. And you watch it, you're like, holy shit, I think she'd be serious. I thought she was just like me. Apparently, Donald Trump's like, that's my plan. So, anyways, um, he also posted some stuff on J6 too, talking about basically the Capitol Hill started this. So, Trump seems to have his head going that way. But he's talking about the H1B visas. Now, as a the America First Movement wants jobs. We want factories here. We want to work, we want jobs. But there's a practicality issue with this. When you open up a factory, say, for example, a Hyundai factory down in Georgia, and you need to get workers, you don't have someone on the employment line that can work with those. It's high-skilled factory.

SPEAKER_10: 43:15

So they're a factory like that, you're gonna need how many people? And this particular 453 Koreans and you have to have thousands ready waiting.

SPEAKER_07: 43:22

Yes. So in this case, it was 453 Koreans that came over on H1B visas to work in the factory. And the idea was they would be here for like a year and then train somebody, but they got rounded up by ice in the process. So they had to let them back go, go back to work because of this very situation. So she's talking about getting rid of H1B visas. In the same conversation, he talked about the 600,000 Chinese students, and he's like, I'm fine with them being here. If we got rid of them, the university system would collapse. Now, you and I might look at that and go, ah, who cares? That's very devastating. You know, there's a lot of small towns in America that just have a college or a university. If everybody decided to jump from snow college in Utah to Harvard because there were seats open, snow college shut down, there goes E from Utah. That's where it's at.

unknown: 44:03

I can't remember.

SPEAKER_07: 44:04

But the point is, you can't just you can't just rip the carpet out from everything. It's the same thing with we can't just say, Oh, we're not buying magnets from China anymore. Then where are you gonna get your magnets, bro? Are you going ahead and suing the BBC?

SPEAKER_21: 44:17

Well, I guess I have to.

SPEAKER_07: 44:18

Oh, excuse me. This is the BBC clip. All that I we're not gonna play the H1 BBC, so just ignore that. This is where he's talking about the BBC. Oh my gosh. So this is where he's talking about the BBC and suing the BBC. Now keep in mind what we just played about Keir Starmer and all that going over going on over there. And remember, the BBC is government-owned.

SPEAKER_19: 44:39

Uh they they defrauded the public, and they've admitted it. And their top echelon, Director General and the CEO of public. This is our supposedly a great ally, BBC. The government has a chunk of that one, I guess. But uh that's a pretty sad event. They actually changed my January 6th speech, which was a beautiful speech, which was a very calming speech, and they made it sound radical. And they actually changed it. What they did was rather incredible. So they're showing me the results later on, the results of what they did, how they butchered it up. But it was very dishonest, and the headman quit, and a lot of the other people.

SPEAKER_07: 45:19

So they've had people leave at the BBC over this, and Trump is threatened. If he didn't get an apology, I think by yesterday he was suing. So he's gonna file a billion-dollar lawsuit against the BBBC, which is government-owned, which means it's gonna require government bailout, or they'll just rebrand it. Which might be the better option, to be completely honest. Now, one of the things with this England situation, the manipulation of the January 6th video, you have to go back to the beginning of this Russia gate thing, right? So we know that Hillary Clinton and her team, through a national policy advisor, suggested you need to dirty up Donald Trump with these Russia accusations and you can get that legs. Then James Comey and John Brennan picked up on that, and collectively with Barack Obama decided to take that dirty laundry, that fake political op narrative to create a narrative to smear Trump with, something you can't disprove, right? They decided to take that and launder it into the FBI and get warrants and then spy on the Trump campaign in order to control him. Okay. This is what Patrick Byrne said. The FBI told him when he set up a bribe with Hillary Clinton. He said, What they're gonna do, this is the Obama administration, they're gonna let Hillary win. It's been decided. They're gonna take this scandal and they're gonna have a little Bunsen burner. So she took a bribe from Qatar. That was the setup that he did. Patrick Byrne did this. We're gonna take that thing, and every time Hillary wants to come close to Obamacare, Bunsen burner. He's gonna heat up the scandal, right? It's gonna keep her as a good little girl. Just do what you're supposed to do, keep Obamacare in place. What'd we just find out about Obamacare two days ago? This all ties in together. Barack Obama had$2.5 million a year in royalties coming off that Obamacare bill. What? Rid of Obamacare, he loses his gravy chain, plus whatever other things he had going on associated with his marquee piece of legislation, which is garbage for we the people, right? So Hillary Clinton gets a bribe. And on top of that, she's dirty as heck with the Clinton Foundation. And the Clinton I mean, this is you know, looking into the Clinton financials, heaven forbid you do that. So, breaking. Pam Bondi and FBI Director Cash Patel have reportedly submitted documents to Congress revealing the Clinton Foundation took donations from foreign and domestic sources seeking influence. Britain spied. We use the Five Eyes network to use British intelligence in order to bypass the requirements not to spy on American citizens. We allowed, we asked them to do the spying through the intelligence networks, do the spying, and then pass the information over. And that's how they bypass spying on American citizens. They get our allies to spy on us for us. That's what they do. Did you know that? So that's where the tie-in happens. This corruption, these foreign leaders, Britain getting them to do the spying on behalf of the Clintons, these guys are all involved. Officials just told the news that the documents were transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days and detail numerous instances of foreigners and even U.S. defense contractor seeking to curry favor with the Clintons through donations to their family charity, including when Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State though Clinton was a president from 1993 to 2001. The officials said some of the evidence was flagged by whistleblowers who claim such evidence was kept from a corruption investigation that was being conducted by 2015 by the Little Rock, Arkansas U.S. Attorney's Office before it was shut down by the Obama administration's Justice Department. At the same time that they decided to go after Trump, they shut the investigation into the Clintons down because she was going to be president. And they had their own little scandal they could use that was unrevealed to the public. So while people might be barking around this closed-down Arkansas thing, the thing that the FBI would eventually use against her would have been the bribe that Patrick Byrne set up, right? Because that was fake. They control the start, the end, the middle. There's no leaks. The real corruption, there's leaks, there's whistleblowers. So you just have to shut it all down, bottle it up, and pretend like it doesn't exist. And they laundered all this through England. So why did the BBC go as far as they did to edit out 56 minutes of a speech and make it sound like it was contiguous? We got to go. I'm gonna walk down with you. We gotta fight, fight, fight. Take your country back. That's not what he said. He said those words separately, distinctly. They edited it all together. This again, no conspiracies, no coincidences. Why would you be an executive at BBC and decide to do that? Well, maybe you're involved with these bigger operations that to us, the people, we don't mean donations to the Clinton Foundation and J6. What does that have to do with each other? It has everything to do with each other. That's that's the unnerving part is this is a huge, huge operation. Uh Emerald Robinson on Lindell TV, she had uh Biggs on, or not Biggs, uh I can't remember his name.

SPEAKER_11: 49:54

It's Andy Biggs.

SPEAKER_07: 49:57

What happened? Andy Biggs. She has Andy Biggs on. Yes, Andy Biggs, got it right. I was like, Joe Biggs? He's a J6er. It's Andy Biggs. So she had Andy Biggs on, and they're talking about this Arctic frost investigation, how big and expansive this thing got.

SPEAKER_16: 50:10

As we reported yesterday, President Donald Trump has finally pardoned the alternate electors from the 2020 presidential election year. Finally, the Patriots who stood up for the truth and for Trump in 2020 are being given what they deserve: freedom from government political persecution. But it isn't only the alternate electors who need justice. It's the countless American conservatives, including elected officials who were illegally spied on, harassed, and even debanked as part of the Biden regime's Operation Arctic Frost.

SPEAKER_07: 50:44

All of this, all of this that happens stems from covering up for the Clintons. There's one genesis to it. That's the only thing covering up for the Clintons. Obama had decided Hillary was going to win, and therefore she could have no problems, and all of her sins had to be cast onto other people. That's all it was.

SPEAKER_16: 51:06

This all starts back within. Literally learn of more and more people on a daily basis. In fact, even state governments like that of Florida are now getting in on the righteous crusade against those who helped Biden with Arctic Frost, like JP Morgan Chase. Watch.

SPEAKER_07: 51:29

Pay attention to the scale of this, right? Oh, hey, you've got a little trial thing going on. You you did some misdemeanor mischief on the Capitol. And even if you assaulted a police officer, even if you concede that point, even if you concede the obstruction of Congress, what does that have to do with my bank accounts? Why did I get debanked? So as you watch this, I need you to realize something. When Trump used to get up and say, they're not coming after me, they're coming after you, I'm standing in the way, as soon as he took them out in 2021, everything you're about to hear happened to me personally.

SPEAKER_17: 52:07

Today we've sent a letter and launched an investigation into JPMorgan Chase Bank after alarming revelations about their coordinated efforts with Jack Smith and the Department of Justice as part of the Biden administration's operation Arctic Frost, where we now know Biden officials went after their political enemies. It's come to our attention that JP Morgan debanked Trump Media Group, a Florida-based company, right before the business went public. This is a crucial time for any company, a time where you cannot afford to lose your bank. In addition, we're aware that JP Morgan Bank solicited tons of information from Trump media unrelated to their business practices, and we believe provided sensitive banking information to the Department of Justice without real probable cause.

SPEAKER_07: 53:13

We'll skip out on Andy Biggs. He just reconfirms all this, and his concern is it's just deep. You know, for an investigation, it's a little DOJ and not little, but you know, a little DOJ investigation to spread to the banks. Like the cancer of the go get Trump and all of his supporters and anybody who's an election and denier, this thing got huge. 98 organizations, everybody involved with TPUSA. You have to recognize as an American, like TPUSA is this big group. It's got millions of participants, lots of people making donations, lots of people buying merch. You're all on the list. Every single one of you is on the list. They were investigating TPUSA, which means they were watching their bank account registers. They know exactly who bought TPUSA hats, buttons, pins, etc., etc. Right? That's a lot of people, man. They're making a really big list. When Trump says, I'm standing in the way, they're after you, I'm standing in the way. As soon as he was gone in 2020, it's exactly what they did. They came after everybody. And your awareness of it or not is just based on if they wanted to take you out.

SPEAKER_10: 54:23

Or your proximity to people that got taken out.

SPEAKER_07: 54:26

Your proximity to people who got taken out. Yeah. It's uh it's stunning to me to think about the broad resources that would be needed, the manpower to do something like this. But in our digital age, one person with an email at the FBI can send the banks and tell them to shut them all down. You can literally shut down half of the conservative movement if the banks are playing with a couple emails.

SPEAKER_10: 54:44

Right. But you ever heard of a mail merge? Yeah, mail merge.

SPEAKER_07: 54:47

Hey, we'd like you to take out anybody who bought TPS US Day. Please limit their accounts to$100 a cash withdrawal a day. Right. Why? Because you bought a TPUSA hat. Click, done, click, done at scale. Right? This is Senator Mullen because the government got opened back up and Donald Trump masterfully played the Democrats. He explains this.

SPEAKER_18: 55:07

I think what happened, though, that a lot of people aren't paying attention to is President Trump out trumped them. He made a brilliant statement and kind of took the fight out of them when he said, hey, instead of us giving the premium tax straight to these insurance companies, let's give it to the individuals. Let's give it to the to the to the people that want to buy health care and want to make the decisions on what program and what uh policy they want to buy themselves. After that, it kind of took the fight out of the out of the Democrats. And that's when you sort of see them splinter.

SPEAKER_15: 55:38

Well, I thought it was very interesting. In his interview with Laura Ingram last night, the president started to lay out some of what a Republican answer would be, a White House answer would be on health care. So how um how much structure is there to this plan? And you know, what what what can we expect next on it? Do you expect that Republicans are gonna have a specific plan that you all can vote on while you have the House?

SPEAKER_07: 56:03

Okay. People in the audience, some of you might be screaming. Ron, did you pick up the big loop here, the arc of all this? I'm sorry.

SPEAKER_10: 56:12

I was uh distracted. It's uh it just happens to be time. I can't, I don't want to tell people what I was looking at.

SPEAKER_07: 56:20

Healthcare. What what was Hillary supposed to preserve for Barack Obama? Healthcare. What was Hillary's marquee issue when she was the first lady health care, which led to Obamacare. They want to protect health care. As soon as Trump said, instead of giving the money to the health care companies, we'll give it to the people to buy it. The shutdown ended. This whole thing. From beginning to end, from Hillary needing to win was to protect Obamacare. That's it. That's it. That's the thing that's killing our country as far as internal policy. It's eating us alive. It's eating us alive because there's corruption baked into it left and right. Barack Obama's on the dole. Who knows who else is on the dole? You got the people who mastermind it that said it depends on the American people being dumb.

SPEAKER_10: 57:12

Well, that makes more sense than anything because if you think about it, what are the tax credits? Uh, what do they amount to? And then think about all the different ways that that can be impinged on or you know, at scale.

SPEAKER_07: 57:27

The COVID-19 pandemic, who benefited? Insurance companies, Obamacare. Oh, there's a pandemic, everybody needs health care. Now you've got lifetime chronic issues. You took the vaccine, we gave it to you for free, but now you're a customer for life on the government's dime. I wonder if Obama's uh royalties go up as the gross medical care in the country rises.

SPEAKER_10: 57:48

Well, if you get a hundred percent buy-in, yeah.

SPEAKER_07: 57:51

To my knowledge, to my knowledge, I'm the only person that's made this full connection here. There's a lot of things cover up. Uranium won, you can still go back to Whitewater scandal with the Clintons, Obama's got fast and furious. But at the end of the day, the unifying thing here, all the way to this government shutdown that put the Democrats in place was when you came for Obamacare. What distance will they go to protect it? Will they murder? Will they put innocent people in prison? Will they set them up? I think they've done all those already. Uh-huh. Get rid of Obamacare. John McCain, thanks for keeping it around for us. It's awesome. All right, guys. Uh, another piece of good news. Or actually, I don't know if it's really good news or not, but in just world interest, China built a brand new bridge, big huge thing. Right when they opened it. Yeah.

unknown: 59:09

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07: 59:10

Uh seven 758-meter-long Hongwak bridge collapses in southwest China months after opening. Months after opening. Now, we did have a bridge in Florida. It was a pedestrian bridge, you know, one that they build in place and then they swing in overnight. So it's like done in the day. Uh, that thing collapsed. I don't know if you remember that a few years ago. So it's not beyond a bridge collapsing, but uh, in other good news, also completely random, for the umpteenth time, where they think they've officially found Noah's Ark. What?

unknown: 59:38

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 59:39

Again. These mountains, millennia. Again, I know it's merged.

SPEAKER_07: 59:43

My whole life. I think they've been circling around this.

SPEAKER_03: 59:46

Oh, I can see it. It's right over there. Yeah. Bloods. And in this beautiful, biblical landscape named in the Old Testament, the shape of a same shape. The book of Genesis says landed here. Yeah, an amount of power. I got I got time.

SPEAKER_01: 1:00:19

We've got right angles and lines.

SPEAKER_07: 1:00:26

Other resources of all exactly. We can only find the permit. All right, guys. I have to cut out early on taking my stuff to get his first not to the US passport. I gotta go do that today, so we will talk to you guys again tomorrow. Bye.

SPEAKER_20: 1:01:07

Old woman. Man. Man, sorry. What knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you looked what I object to is he automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh, king, eh? Very nice. And how'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress. How'd you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The king of the Britain. Who the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. No, we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes are. How dare you go? That's what it's all about. Only people would these good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives in castle. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I think by a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quiet, not by a two-thirds majority. In the case of being quiet. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. You don't vote for king. The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet! Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some Moisson bitch had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up, will you? Shut up! Ah! Now we see the violence inherent in the system! Shut up! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help! I'm being repressed! Bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?