Russia Peace Talks, Epstein Files, And Fallout

The news cycle feels loud and aimless—until you connect the threads. We start with quiet reports of a 28‑point Russia–Ukraine peace framework and a very loud Saudi visit in DC, two signals that global pressure may be shifting while domestic cracks widen. From there we dive into a political whiplash moment: the Epstein files bill that promised bombshells but ricocheted onto unexpected Democrats, and an eye‑opening indictment of a sitting House member over alleged FEMA funds laundering into campaigns. When oversight trails ambition, the grift fills the gap.

On the home front, the stakes get bigger. Nvidia’s AI boom is powering America’s re‑industrialization and job creation, but it also concentrates risk in a few hands and demands far better guardrails. If chips are effectively dual‑use, policy can’t treat them like nail salons. In our cities, Seattle questions the logic of publicly funded drug paraphernalia amid record overdoses and a historic police staffing crisis, while DC reverses course and ends cashless bail. When incentives contradict outcomes, communities pay the price.

We also go inside the federal prison system—where staffing collapses, broken First Step Act delivery, and delayed credits keep people inside longer than the law intends. With the vast majority returning home, that’s not just a moral failure; it’s a public safety mistake. And in a pivotal shift, HHS walks back the absolute claim that “vaccines do not cause autism,” acknowledging the evidence doesn’t support categorical certainty. Honest nuance isn’t fear—it’s how trust gets rebuilt.

If there’s a single theme tying this all together, it’s competence over catchphrases: precise diplomacy, real oversight for AI, incentives that reduce crime without surrendering civil liberties, and justice systems that do what the law says. Join us, weigh the tradeoffs, and help shape where this moment goes next. If this resonated, follow the show, share it with a friend, and drop a comment—what should we dig into next?

Chapters

• 0:00 Cold Open And Show Kickoff
• 2:05 Russia–Ukraine Peace Plan Rumors
• 4:20 Saudi Visit Signals And Geopolitics
• 6:45 Epstein Files Bill And Political Backfire
• 15:20 Pam Bondi, “New Information,” And Legal Implications
• 20:05 Larry Summers Clip And Media Spin
• 22:40 Fundraising Fumbles And Misattributed Donations
• 27:30 Listener Engagement And Program Plugs
• 29:20 FEMA Fraud Case: Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
• 36:00 Ad Break And Show Banter
• 37:30 $74M Plumbing Scheme And Labor Trafficking
• 44:40 Community Fraud In Minnesota’s Housing Services
• 49:20 Canada’s “One-Touch” Asylum And U.S. Parallels
• 53:30 School Absences And Immigration Raids
• 58:40 Smuggling Indictments And Financial Networks
• 1:02:40 Jobs, Private Sector Gains, And AI Manufacturing
• 1:08:10 Nvidia Boom, AI Oversight, And Bubble Risks
• 1:15:30 Populism, Nationalism, And Fuentes’ “Compromise”
• 1:23:50 Urban Policy Shifts: Drugs, Police, And Cameras
• 1:31:10 Ending Cashless Bail In DC
• 1:33:30 HHS Backs Off “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism” Claim
• 1:41:20 Toxins, Sunscreen, And Autism Risk Factors
• 1:45:10 Private Segment Tease And DOJ/BOP Focus
• 1:47:30 “Insurrection” Language And Legal Standards
• 1:53:10 Calls To Action And Transition To Private
• 1:55:00 Fannie/Freddie Blueprint And Mortgage Market Fix
• 2:02:40 Federal Prisons: Staffing, Abuse, And Reform Agenda

Transcript

SPEAKER_08: 0:53

You see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad to be back with you today on uh what day is today? Thursday. Hey, I forgot to mention it yesterday, but I'm pretty sure yesterday, if not yesterday, then the 23rd.

SPEAKER_11: 1:22

I can't even remember what day today is.

SPEAKER_08: 1:24

Well, no, the 19th is either when my trial started or it's the day I got remanded. I can't remember what it was. But either way, two years ago I was being remanded. Yeah. That was fun. I got uh there was a conversation on X about you know going January 6th or going back to DC for January 6th.

SPEAKER_11: 1:45

Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:47

I was like, well, we all have our own reasons and motivations for why we want to go back. You know, last time I was in DC, I was taken away from my family in chains. But I'd like to go back a free man. Oh, come on.

SPEAKER_11: 1:59

It'll be fun.

SPEAKER_08: 2:00

Yeah. Anyways, but I said uh I will not be participating in any wild activities or anything like that. I was like, anyways, so great news came out yesterday evening. Uh, and this is all happening kind of quietly behind the scenes, but apparently the Russia-Ukraine talks are advancing significantly. Oh. Oh, that was gonna be so smooth. Uh I changed the sound over. Just a second, everybody. How are we doing in the chats? Pony Boy, good morning. Carlites, howdy all super consistent, love it. Okay, sound okay.

SPEAKER_25: 2:35

Great. Okay, here we go. Minutes here that the president has approved a 28-point plan for peace between Russia and Ukraine, according to a senior administration official. This is just into us here at NBC News. This official says this has been getting worked out over the last several weeks, and it comes as sources are telling us army leaders are making a surprise trip to Ukraine to try to revive the peace process. All of it coming at the end of a day, where the Saudi crowned prince was making the rounds here in DC, doing some politics and some business with the president and on Capitol Hill. You can see Mohammed bin Salman, MBS, as he's known, uh, there at the White House. This was yesterday. He was also walking through the hill with the House Speaker, the president touting billions of dollars in deals with the Saudis, investments on things like nuclear energy, minerals, tech, etc. Let me bring in Garrett Hake at the White House. And Garrett, I have to start with your new reporting.

SPEAKER_08: 3:22

Uh so the thing that was cool about that Saudi meeting is you know, I don't know if you remember when Israel came last time. Netanyahu came through the back door, Trump didn't greet him. You know, it was kind of like, hey, just come in here and let's have a quick meeting. But it's still a state visit, and there was like no pomp and circumstance. Whereas with the Saudi one, holy cow, they rolled out the whole thing, had F-35 flyovers, it was a big deal, a lot of signaling out to the world. But that's been happening in the background, so it sounds like we're getting closer and closer to a Russia deal. Yeah, a couple months ago, I said, okay, we're done with the Epstein thing. You're like, oh, and I was like, okay, well, Epstein again, and then last this week it's like, ah, Epstein again. So not gonna spend a lot of time on Epstein today. Thank goodness. Yeah, but Trump did sign the Epstein bill into law.

SPEAKER_07: 4:09

All right.

SPEAKER_08: 4:10

This is another one of those. Like, I don't know, as a as a MAGA supporter, I'm like, did we just roll the dice? Like, was this just we'll see how it goes?

SPEAKER_11: 4:18

Yeah, I don't know either. The whole time that this thing was rolling along, it's like, are we taking two steps back? Because can't we just do the thing that they're trying to now do formally? I don't know.

SPEAKER_08: 4:29

Well, that's now the accusation. So now they've put it in the law and you gotta release things, and now they're gonna blame Pam Bonnie for not releasing things. And of course, they've opened up the SDNY investigation. So now, even yesterday, and I'll play this clip. Pam Bonnie R talk about it.

SPEAKER_11: 4:41

It seems like this just gives more opportunities to flex and have all kinds of obscuscation, if I can say the word right.

SPEAKER_08: 4:50

One thing that I honestly believed was that they knew what was in the files until the last couple days, and I'm like, oh, they clearly don't know what's in the files. This is just like any other bill these people have ever passed. They don't read, they're here for the clicks and the donations, they're not here for the policy, right? So, like the self-own of Plaskitt texting live and uh Hakeem Jeffries raising campaign contributions, and there's others too. It's like really, you know, but what what Jamie, what uh James Colmer said, they have TDS so bad they'll take out Bill and Hillary and Barack and Hakeem if that means they might get a scalp out of Donald Trump. So we'll see. So Donald Trump signed the bill yesterday. He's Jeff Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged by the Trump Justice Department in 2019, not the Democrats, was a lifelong Democrat, donated thousands of dollars to Democrat politicians, and was deeply associated with many well-known Democrat figures, such as Bill Clinton, who traveled on his plane 26 times, Larry Summers, who just resigned from many boards, including Harvard, sleazebag political activist Reed Hoffman, LinkedIn founder, minority leader Hakeem Jeffries, who asked Epstein to donate to his campaign after Epstein was charged, Democrat Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, and many more. Perhaps the truth about these Democrats and their associations with Jeffrey Epstein will soon be revealed because I have just signed the bill to release the Epstein files. As everyone knows, I asked Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune to pass the bill in the House and Senate respectively. Because of this request, the votes were almost unanimous in favor of passage. At my direction, the Department of Justice has already turned over close to 50,000 pages of documents to Congress. Do not forget the Biden administration did not turn over a single file related to Democrats or Epstein. I had said that when Elon left, and we recorded it, man, so it's all on the record, right? I mean, we can you can what's happening here, but we talked about the pincer move.

SPEAKER_11: 6:49

Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 6:50

Elon left, he planted the seed, Trump's in the Epstein files. That's when we released him, he's a pedo. The Democrats took that seed and they watered it and fertilized it and put grow lights on it and a nice humid area to grow. They absolutely made that thing grow up to where you had Democrats just dreams in the files, let's get them, let's get them. And then they release a batch of them, and it's like, we thought you'd give us some juicy stuff. This is the opposite of what you told us. I mean, even Sink Younger was like, what is this? What am I looking at here? This didn't get Donald Trump, nor did they ever, ever speak about him. Democrats have used the Epstein issue, which affects them far more than the Republican Party, in order to try to distract from our amazing victories, including the great big beautiful bill, tax cut, tax cut bill, strong borders, no men and women's sports or transgender for everyone, ending DEI, stopping Biden's record setting inflation, lowering prices, biggest tax and regulation cuts in history, ending eight wars, rebuilding our military, knocking out Iran's nuclear capacity capability, getting trillions of dollars invested in the USA, creating the hottest country anywhere in the world, and even delivering a huge defeat to the Democrats in the recent shutdown disaster. For years, our great nation has had to endure Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, impeachment hoax number one, impeachment hoax number two, and many other Democrat-created witch hunts and scams. All of this, which have been so terrible in devices for our country and have been done to confuse, deflect, and distract from the great job that Republicans and the Trump administration are doing. This latest hoax will backfire on the Democrats, just as all the rest have. Thank you for your this attention to this matter, MAGA. Now, every one of those hoaxes did, in fact, backfire ultimately, but not without a lot of pain. But then again, what do they say? True gold, true dross, or true dross, dross ain't afraid of nothing. True gold is not afraid of the refiner's fire, right? So if you really can make it, you're good. Now, Pam Bondi was asked yesterday. They announced a crimp uh a large criminal indictment against a drug dealer. I I can't remember his name. Um, anyways, they're calling him like the modern-day Pablo Escobar, tons of money. Oh, yeah. Anyways, Canada, you know, they upped his, you know,$15 million. They'll find him eventually and he'll die in America, in American federal prison. Probably the one where I was at with his black-handed Mexican mafia buddies. But, anyways, Pam Body at the end of this press conference was asked about the Epstein files because, in as a matter of law, the Attorney General already made a statement saying we've reviewed the evidence and there's nothing left to investigate or anybody to indict. But now, after Trump put out the tweet, go investigate Reed Hoffman, Bill Clinton, and others, she said this.

SPEAKER_16: 9:42

What changed uh since then that you launched the investigation?

SPEAKER_01: 9:46

Information that has come forward. Information. Um there's information that new information, additional information, and again, we will continue to follow the law, to investigate any leads. If there are any victims, we encourage all victims to come forward. Um, and we will continue to provide maximum transparency under the law.

SPEAKER_08: 10:08

Now, I don't have my black's law dictionary sitting here next to me, but that word information is a trouble word. When a cop walks around and goes, hey, I'm just looking for some information. Information is the means by which they charge you. It's literally you can be charged by quote information. Slash evidence. No, information is a synonym to indictment, invoice, charge, bill, presentment, claim. They are synonyms. Okay. So when a cop says, I'm looking for some information, anything you say or do can be will, can and will be used against you as a charge. You give them the information to charge you. So when they say new information, it's not just, hey, a new news story popped up. It's new indictment, something new that rises to the level of probable cause. Information is beyond probable cause. It's the charge. That's a different information. Doesn't lead to probable cause. Probable cause leads to information. Information is used in the legal profession to say the charge. This is the charge. This is the information we are charging you with. Right. So that's important to understand. She said information five times as an attorney. She's not saying, well, Trump told us to, or we read a news story. That's that's data. When we say information, we are thinking the legal term data, right? That's not what they're saying. When they say information, they're literally saying, I have the charge. I have a new charge. And who is the new charge? One of those people is this Larry Summers. Yesterday we played the clip of him retiring, but this was him in 2016 saying Donald Trump was the greatest threat to, you know, everything.

SPEAKER_17: 11:56

I think the prospect of Donald Trump being president would be the gravest threat to our prosperity, our security, and our freedom in my adult lifetime. So that's the thing I would worry most about.

SPEAKER_18: 12:22

And that I've said that I'm gonna step back from public activities for a time, but I think it's very important so much.

SPEAKER_08: 12:32

So if you're a question, I'm gonna we're gonna go forward. We played that yesterday. But you know, that's the kind of guy, a guy who would do anything because Donald Trump's a huge threat to democracy and our way of business and well, and to his adult life freedom. I mean, everything he said was truthful. Now, the Democrats, as as expressed by Jessica Tarlov here on Fox News on their what, Fox and Five or whatever, she's like, Why is Donald Trump flip-flopping on this issue? And Greg Gutfeld, who has incredible insight and you know, a hotline phone number to President Trump if he had the question, had this to say.

SPEAKER_26: 13:12

Why did he want the files to not come out this badly? Why? Just tell me why.

SPEAKER_06: 13:18

Why do you always fall for this stuff? Is the bigger question again?

SPEAKER_23: 13:22

Russia, Ukraine, everything.

SPEAKER_06: 13:25

I am not nobody thinks it's the end of Donald Trump. It could be the end for the Democrats. You're watching it happen in real time. I love how you say, you know, you look at it at email, Akim Jeffrey. Oh, it's just a fundraising email. As if, as if, as if it were Republican, you, your party, the media would not interpret it in the worst light. For example, it's amazing how the brilliant Jasmine Crockett thinks there's only one Jeffrey Epstein. And that one Jeffrey Epstein somehow gave money to Lee Zeldon. No, I know this is hard to believe. There is more than one Jeffrey Epstein.

SPEAKER_08: 14:03

So Jasmine Crockett got up on the floor and was like, lots of Republicans have taken money from Jeffrey Epstein. And she reads off a list of Republicans who took a donation from uh Jeffrey Epstein. Now she specified on CNN that she said uh Jeffrey Epstein. And then she goes, We only had 30 minutes to read this bill and decide on this. So we did a quick search. We didn't have time to vet it, but it was uh Jeffrey Epstein. Dr. Jeffrey Epstein in in New York, a practicing doctor who is a Republican, has made Republican donations. And he's very offended to be alleged to be the disgraced pedophile financier, Jeffrey Epstein, right? Jeez, anyways, so you know, again, Greg Gutfeld, he's not wrong there. The Democrats could implode in real time if it wasn't a cult. And and I say that having the allegation made that MAGA is a cult, right? It's like, uh you guys are a cult. MAGA can MAGA can actually like look in the mirror. You know what I mean? Like you guys see their reflection. We can see our reflection. Now, I do uh again, yesterday I did my 1776.us live, which by the way, anybody who's interested in that that's not currently involved, please go to 1776live.us and register for the Ignite presentation. It's a lot of fun. So uh, and also by the way, I need to pimp for chats too before I move on to the story. We still need our, you know, a handful of chatters before the end of the month. And I don't want to get all desperate in the last three days and have friends making dummy accounts. That one extra chat. So if you're listening, please check in in the chat, let us know you're here. That'd be great.

SPEAKER_11: 15:40

Especially if you haven't chatted before.

SPEAKER_08: 15:42

It's literally a once-a-month thing, right? I have a certain to to be in the Rumble creator program so they can blast this out to all of you guys, which I don't know if we're getting a whole lot of growth benefit out of it. But either way, we have to hit the chat requirement. We also have to read four more ads. Oh, wonderful. So at some point we're gonna have to do that. Okay, so yesterday I'm wrapping up of my day, and I log in to check the news one more time as I do habitually throughout the day, and whoopah! House Democrat charged with stealing five million in FEMA funds and making illegal campaign contributions. Now I know what you're thinking. Oh, this is just another state senator, state house member. No, this is the U.S. Congress. This is uh Sheila Seferis McCormick from Florida, and she's facing a maximum of 53 years in prison. Dr. Sheila Seferis McCormick, Democrat of Florida, was indicted Wednesday on charges she stole and laundered five million in federal relief funds and used the money for her congressional campaign, the Justice Department said. They were laundering FEMA money back into politics. This is the allegation. This is the thing that Elon Musk said, that Burkhart said, that so many people that have been eaten and chewed up and spit out by the DC machine have said they're stealing your money over there. And yet nothing ever happens. And yesterday, for the first time in my lifetime, I mean, I guess you had the Menendez cases, but these they don't go nowhere. I mean, Menendez is in prison. That was that was weird. The gold bars made it funny or made it made it interesting. But this one is just straight up corruption. In a news release citing the indictment, the Justice Department said that uh Sephera sit, I don't even know this age, McCormick, 46, and Edwin Surflis, 51, her brother worked on a staffing contract funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for COVID vaccinations tied to their family health care company in 2021. And that company was overpaid by five million funds. She and her brother are accused of conspiring to steal the overpayment and route it through various accounts to conceal its origins.

SPEAKER_11: 17:52

I wonder how much money that that their what kind of a company is it? It's a their healthcare company.

SPEAKER_08: 17:59

Healthcare company doing disasters.

SPEAKER_11: 18:02

I wonder how much work that that healthcare company actually did or if it was just a shell.

SPEAKER_08: 18:06

Well, we're gonna talk about a different company and how much healthcare it did here in a second. Okay, is alleged to have used the money for her own enrichment and to fund her significant part of her congressional campaign. Surfalous McCormick won a special election in January 2022 to fill the seat of late Democratic Alice Hastings. She won 73% of the vote in that year's general election and was re-elected last year. She ran uncontested. I would be very concerned about these districts that have those kind of margins. Oh, yeah. Even on the Republican side. That allows this blatant bold-face corruption because who's going to challenge him in that position? The Justice Department said syphilis McCorm uh, I'm sure I've saying her name wrong. I apologize. Uh, and another defendant, Najee LeBlanc, 46, also used straw donors to secure additional campaign contributions, funneling other disaster relief money from FEMA funded contract to friends and relatives who then made donations to the campaigns as if they were contributing their own money. Surphyllis McCormick and a man who is alleged to have prepared her 2021 taxes are also charged with filing a false federal tax return for that year. Uh her office didn't return any anything for comment. She did not cast votes in a series of roll call votes Wednesday night in the House. Oh, but don't worry, she is committed to be a public servant. So yeah, that's great. I I just for the record, just so everybody understands, there are currently three sitting members of the House under federal indictment. Lamonica McIver, New Jersey for assaulting a federal agent, Sheila's Affairs McCormick now, Florida, for stealing five million from her campaign or from FEMA, and Henry Kohler, Texas for bribery. They are all under actual federal criminal indictment. Grand juries and everything. I want to be like that little kid on the the uh the whoops, the show, you know, Hercules, Hercules, like it's happening, it's happening. These are the little things now. The nutty professor. Will this go off with a bang today, or will this just kind of be cast under the mug? Obviously, people are now, you know, we've had this censorship. We're gonna censor Plaska, and then we're gonna censor Mills. Oh, they'll cancel each other out. Now they're gonna they voted to censor Mills, but then that because it got forced to vote, but 300 people voted to send it to the ethics committee for investigation. So it'll go there, spend 20, 30 days, maybe die, maybe continue, who knows? But now you've got this issue. Hey, listen, this is bold face. Looks like you were stealing money right from FEMA, and you're from 2022, you're not that vested. You gotta go. I mean, you know, it's one thing if Lindsey Graham pulls off something like this. Guy's been there for 30 years, Nancy Pelosi, but 2022. I mean that think about that for a second. How bold you have to be to do that in 2022. Uh you got something there for us? I'm trying. All right, let's do morning kick.

SPEAKER_11: 20:58

We might as well we might as well. Let's see. Whoa! Hey you there's this video. It's from Chuck Norris. Yeah, it was insane. He's in his 80s and says he still feels like he's in his 50s. It was pretty shocking. He had some pretty cool tips in there too on what's he's doing, including these three foods that he's avoiding, like the plague. He explained all the things he was doing, and it was super simple. They're so easy, and you can do them right at home. When I first saw this, I knew I had to share this with you all. So since what happened to Chuck could also happen to you too. With a new method, of course, your results can vary, but the video is definitely worth checking out. Watch this new method by clicking the link in the chat or scanning the QR code on your screen. You won't believe how simple it is.

SPEAKER_08: 21:51

And what's really great about this ad is you have to follow through to find out what the heck he's talking about. Yeah. I wasn't sure what I was talking about. He really is a cliffhanger of an ad. I mean, it's like and and Chuck Norris, and it's like, click the link and find out. So somebody needs to report back to us what the morning kickstart programming needs to be. Thank you for doing that, Rod. Okay, so now we jump over to Michigan and we find out about a plumbing company that had a little bit of an immigration problem.

SPEAKER_13: 22:28

It's not just simply an immigration case that's charged, it's also money laundering.

SPEAKER_14: 22:32

And these are the federal documents investigators say detail the inner workings of the plumbing empire built by Moises Orduña Rios and his wife Raquel over a five-year period. The Plymouth Township couple own Orduña Plumbing, manpower supply, and allegedly hired under I want to point something out here.

SPEAKER_08: 22:48

I'm in the trades. You're in the trades, right? Trade adjacent. Yeah, your white-collar tradesman. Sure. Five years to build a plumbing company that's got$75 million worth of cash flow. What do you think?

SPEAKER_11: 23:00

Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_08: 23:01

No, it's pretty aggressive. No, that's zero. No, not happening. No, no. Like Mercurios? No. In five years from zero to hero, five years, 75 million? No. No, more like 15. Maybe, maybe more like 50. Okay. I I mean, it's very few plumbing companies are doing 75 million in revenue. That's true. Okay. We're talking rotorooter national brands.

SPEAKER_11: 23:25

Yeah, you can't do it.

SPEAKER_08: 23:26

We're not talking about Jose Rodriguez. 75 satellite offices. We're not talking about first generation immigrant in five years in Michigan competing with good old boys. No. He's gonna pull off a$75 million. No, you'd have to have sat you'd have to have about 75 satellite offices. Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 23:42

So how did he do it? Minute workers took their passports and crammed them into tight living quarters. These photos from the criminal code. Oh, slave labor.

SPEAKER_08: 23:50

Oh, kind of like our local guy here that I used to compete with, who sent his daughter to law school to be an immigration lawyer so he could literally traffic people here to work for him for slave wages. Like we know this happens here. I know a company that's doing this.

SPEAKER_14: 24:04

The federal complaint focuses on Rochester, New York, but Michigan, Ohio, and North Carolina are also mentioned as places the company operates. According to the complaint, out of 253 workers, only six were in the U.S. legally and permitted to work. The complaint claims the husband and wife generated$74 million in their plumbing business that was based out of Michigan.

SPEAKER_13: 24:24

So whenever you use money that is unlawful and you deposit it into a bank and you manipulate the banking system, that's money laundering. And that's what the government's alleging here. In this case, you've got physical evidence, statement of the people arrested, and the government was listening to the communications of the defendants. So you actually have all three of those things. And whenever you have a criminal defendant speaking and being recorded, and the government has that evidence, that's extremely powerful, and the burden on that is really hard to overcome.

SPEAKER_14: 25:11

The company headquarters is in Plymouth Township, where we stopped to see if anyone was present who could speak to the allegations. No one was there. We then went next door.

SPEAKER_03: 25:19

It's pretty crazy how big the operation was, you know, with very little activity that was there.

SPEAKER_14: 25:24

Jeff Goebels, a golf pro, runs his business in an adjacent office space.

SPEAKER_08: 25:28

He said anybody who's a small business owner, 75 million. Certain industries, yeah, I get it, you know, the price points of products and stuff like that. But at the end of the day, most people work 40 hours a week for a living. Okay. And some people do get rich, and plumbers absolutely can get rich. But do the math. I mean, I was in the excavation business, quarter million dollars for a dump truck and a you know, truck and transfer setup, a hundred and fifty thousand for an excavator, you're charging hundreds of dollars an hour. Plumbers aren't charging that.

SPEAKER_11: 25:58

They got burn rate.

SPEAKER_08: 26:00

They got, you know, Echo Line vans. I mean, they can't scale up like that. The amount of daily revenue you have to get to spread$75 million over five years, so$24 million,$25 million a year.

SPEAKER_11: 26:10

You're talking, uh, you're talking Well, they're not making a thousand dollars an hour either.

SPEAKER_08: 26:15

You're talking you're talking two uh like what is it? In fact, it's worth doing the math.$25 million. Okay, so you got$25 million divided by 280 working days or something like that. It's like$892,000 a day. Stealing from you, by the way. They had to money launder it in because they earned it illegally, stealing from you, your kids, uh my my peers that could be working in those industries.

SPEAKER_14: 26:43

See about three people in and out of the office, and he's stunned by the allegations.

SPEAKER_03: 26:47

That's kind of frightening that they could get that deep. Just look like a normal business that I didn't see a lot of like work trucks coming in and out. Um, but that it was that detailed with the immigration issues that are going on today. It's pretty interesting.

SPEAKER_14: 27:05

The couple, whose address comes back to this$1.5 million mansion in Plymouth Township, were released Tuesday on conditions after appearing in Michigan Eastern District Court. The couple's next core date is scheduled for December 6th. So that's fun.

SPEAKER_11: 27:18

I like the how they call the million-dollar house a mansion. Out here, they're just houses.

SPEAKER_08: 27:22

Yeah, the starter house. Starter house without a view. Yeah.

unknown: 27:29

Yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 27:29

No, I want to move to Michigan. Your half a million dollars will buy you a pretty nice McMansion out there. Okay, so now we jump over to the Somali community, which they've been digging into this community. In Somalia? In Michigan. In Minnesota, the Somali community in Minnesota. These guys, the community, not the individuals, right? Now I want to paint the picture and be a racist. The community is taking fraudulently using every government system you can imagine.

SPEAKER_10: 27:58

Mr. Adal, can we ask you some questions? Asad Adal did not want to talk outside St. Paul Federal Court. How many vulnerable people did you leave sitting in a snowbank so you could lie in your own pockets? But once inside, he admitted on the record that his company, Leo Human Services, ripped off taxpayers to the tune of$2.7 million while falsely claiming to help 250 people find housing. How would you describe that$14,000 that was billed to your Medicaid? Rod. On every level. I never met with them. I've never even seen him. Carol Evan first began investigating the BMW driving business owner earlier this year. We have so much work to do.

SPEAKER_14: 28:38

I mean, I'm being asked questions here.

SPEAKER_10: 28:39

Oh, people say you're not doing work, that you're billing thousands of dollars for work that's not being done. I'm doing everything I am correctly. That was not true. Kara's investigation exposed a family fraud factory operating out of this Blaine home. Assad's brother, Anwar Adow is running another HSS company called Liberty Plus, also stealing from taxpayers and preying on vulnerable Minnesotans, desperate to find a home.

SPEAKER_25: 29:11

And that any day never comes.

SPEAKER_10: 29:12

When agents raided the Adow brothers' home, they seized stacks of cash, tens of thousands of dollars hidden under a mattress and in a suitcase beneath the stairs. How did you and your brother get involved in this HSS scheme? As part of his plea deal, Assad admitted he used the millions he fraudulently billed to lease that BMW and buy property in Kenya. How much money did you move overseas? Both he and his brother have now pled guilty to wire fraud and face four to five years in prison when sentenced.

SPEAKER_08: 29:41

I'll tell you what, man, for$2.7 million, I'd have spent 14 months in jail. You know, he's gonna get first step acts, so he'll only end up spending about two and a half years in prison for 2.7 million. And I doubt they'll claw back the land in Kenya, just my guess. Jeez, man. Oh my gosh. Now you can see the problem. Jobs, plumbing jobs, plumbing jobs taken by that guy who's bringing in 250 employees, and only six of them at his corporation are legal. I mean, those are that's 400 and 247, 40. My math is bad today.

SPEAKER_11: 30:21

That's a big number.

SPEAKER_08: 30:22

It's a lot of jobs. It's a lot of jobs for those little communities. Okay, now Canada is about, they're gonna have a problem. Why do I know they're gonna have a problem? Well, listen to how they're doing their immigration checks.

SPEAKER_20: 30:36

In essence, uh, to speed things up, because we are short staffed, we're allowing people into the country without first doing that security screening. Um, hold on a second.

SPEAKER_22: 30:46

So you're saying that a refugee claimant coming to Canada goes to a machine and says, I want to be a refugee in Canada, hits a button and they're in the country. Is that what you're saying?

SPEAKER_20: 30:59

Yeah, it's it's not a machine, it's an application. So the one-touch system, they're given instructions on how to use that that connects directly with IRCC, and they're given that documentation to complete on their own once they're in the country. We're not doing that.

SPEAKER_22: 31:13

So basically they they take out their phone theoretically and they tap it a few times, and they are now in the country as a refugee accepted by our country.

SPEAKER_20: 31:22

Uh, yes, we get some basic data from them, and again, we do the biometrics. Beyond that, they're doing that on their own, yes. So in essence, uh to speed things up.

SPEAKER_08: 31:30

By the way, it was the same thing happening in the US under Biden. So build a wall, build a northern wall. Are we going full Game of Thrones?

SPEAKER_09: 31:38

Do we need a northern ice wall?

SPEAKER_08: 31:41

Or the zombies gonna come down? Now we did this for four years, and the impact was dramatic in local communities. So this is uh is this New Hampshire? North Carolina. So this is North Carolina is having a little bit of an issue with school attendance.

SPEAKER_02: 31:56

Class typically has 16 students in it. We had four.

SPEAKER_07: 32:00

District wide, there are 145,030 students enrolled in Charlotte Mecklenburg schools. On Monday, 30,399 were absent, 28,136 unexcused. While CMS doesn't break down the numbers by ethnic origin, Gillespie, a multilingual teacher, did.

SPEAKER_02: 32:20

Children of parents from Angola, from Vietnam, but the students who were whose parents come from Latin American countries were the students we were missing. So that was kind of the line, even among the ML students, is that we were missing Hispanic students.

SPEAKER_08: 32:37

Why would we be missing 25% or 21% of the student body in North Carolina? Because they're doing raids in North Carolina.

SPEAKER_11: 32:44

Yeah, so they're scared. So they're scared. So they're either hiding or they've left. Most likely hiding.

SPEAKER_08: 32:51

But today they didn't steal our money because they didn't go to school. Right? Because they're stealing your money when they go to school and get public services. You know what I mean? So you know, 20% of the school district in North Carolina is illegal immigrant kids. What did I say about the population here? The local nurse here, when my oldest my youngest was born, said 50% of the kids here are born without parents that are citizens.

SPEAKER_11: 33:13

Wow.

SPEAKER_08: 33:14

Right. So eventually you start looking at our school districts and you'll see this. How do you have a country? Not a nation. A nation is a political association, a nation is a corporation, a country, the land and her people. How do you have a country with a culture when you have 20% that come with a foreign language and a foreign culture? And don't assume. Mexico does not share our culture. The South Americans do not share the same culture we have. They have a separate and distinct culture. It would be one thing if we had a bunch of Albertans crossing the border, right? Or a bunch of Saskatchewans crossing the border. Totally, eh? Yeah, it'd be it'd be like almost unnoticeable culture-wise, right? Except they'd be like, you know, save the queen or whatever, and we'd be like, what are you talking about? But beyond that, really into hockey, a pretty yeah. Louisiana might finally get that hockey team. But so beyond that, though, it would be not a big deal. It'd be a huge it's a huge deal with it coming from the Latin cultures. Now, is there a fusion culture Latin American? Absolutely. Go visit Texas. What do you think Tex Mex is? Right, right. So, and uh while Pam Bondi was doing the press conference about the notorious drug dealer, Reading, I think his name, Chris Redding or something. Writing, writing, something like that. She was also asked about another case in Tampa, Florida, that they unsealed some indictments that again dealt with this immigration fraud. And it's not just the people, the people affect your jobs, they affect your kids' experience in the classroom. But then on top of that, you have the actual financial corruption.

SPEAKER_01: 34:51

Just this week, Joint Task Force Alpha took four major enforcement actions. Right here in Tampa, we unsealed the indictment, charging 12 defendants operating a massive right here in Tampa, a massive illegal smuggling ring. The defendants engaged in a conspiracy to bring illegal aliens from Cuba to the U.S. for profit. They coached their clients, including children who came to airports alone, came to our country alone, were put on planes for connecting flights, lied to Border Patrol agents due to coaching and law enforcement. They charged up to$40,000 per victim. They used Zell to transfer over seven million dollars over the course of this scheme, and I believe had profits, cash of over 18 million.

SPEAKER_11: 35:54

So I like how she says all this. Like it's supposed to be shocking, and we just sit here like, uh-huh. Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 36:00

Yeah, yeah. Thanks for all the facts. Thanks for catching up. Glad you're here. Yep. This, this again, when I saw this most recent indictment against this Democrat, I was like, right on the heels of the Epstein files coming out. I was like, is this it? Russia's brokering piece, the rest of the world's kind of chilled out, America's got reinvestment coming in, trade deals are being settled, China is being pressured. Now is Trump gonna turn domestic? Right? Is he taking care of the big picture so the pressure's off?

SPEAKER_09: 36:36

Right?

SPEAKER_08: 36:36

Because if you have a domestic issue and then there's an international issue, it that's how things fall apart. So if you can get the international pressures off so you're not spending blood and treasure overseas. Well, I don't I don't think we're done by any means. Oh no. Oh no. But in 10 months, Trump has accomplished a lot when it comes to tangible things. Now, when you have been unemployed for six months and you get that first job, it's gonna take a year or two to dig out. It's just kind of the way it works, unless it's a huge pay increase or something. But what Trump is doing matters.

SPEAKER_23: 37:08

1.9 million more American-born workers are employed today. Think of that than when I took office. So we picked up almost two million workers, and more Americans are now working, as I said, than at any time in the history of our country. Under Biden, one out of every four new jobs went to increase the size of the federal government. So, in other words, one out of four was a federal worker. Well, I love our federal workers, but that's not the way you can build a country. It's a short road to a disaster. Under my administration, one hundred percent, think of that, of all new jobs created came out of the private sector. 1.9 million more American-born workers are in it.

SPEAKER_08: 37:57

Say that again. 100% of jobs, two million jobs that have been created under Trump have been in the private sector. As opposed to Joe Biden, where it was one in four, was coming from the government, which meant it was a cost on the balance sheet. The other thing that is significant about that, which he didn't say in this little clip, was under Joe Biden, the net increase in jobs went exclusively to foreign-born. So you didn't have one net job gain for legacies. And why is that? It's because factories are finally building here. So Nvidia stood up a factory very quickly, and they're now building the most advanced chips right here.

SPEAKER_29: 38:34

We manufactured the most advanced AI chips in the world, in the most advanced Fab in the world, here in America for the first time. Uh, all of this started with President Trump wanting to re-industrialize the United States. His TRARS was a pressing uh agent in making this possible at this at the at the speed that we're doing. And now at uh uh just in shortly after less than a year, we're now manufacturing the most advanced chips for AI here in the United States. This is just the beginning of it. Uh, with the partnership of the supply chain in Taiwan, TSMC is an incredible partner and a strategic partner for the United States and bringing manufacturing of the most in most critical sector of technology here to the United States. Uh, this is just the starting point. Where after that, with Foxconn, Amcor, Spill, uh, Wistron, so many of our other partners, we're going to bring the entire supply chain of building AI infrastructure back here in the United States. By the end of uh the next uh three or four years, we'll probably manufacture, we're on target to manufacture about half a trillion dollars of AI supercomputing technology to be installed here.

SPEAKER_08: 39:50

If you follow Ray Dalio's uh the big cycle speech, and he talks about, you know, countries have a new industry and technology, and every time there's one of these big cycles, it starts off with something new, right? There's some new so the the American current dominance is we exported vehicles, we exported appliances, we exported uh technology, we exported computers, we exported railroads, we exported a bunch planes, you know, we exported a bunch of tech. But then eventually it got cheaper to build that tech overseas, and that leads to we become decadent, and it's cheaper to pay someone over there to build something than something over here, make it cheaper, right? So we kind of it kind of becomes self-defeating once you kind of reach that arch. And we definitely reach the art. Well, now you've got new technology. So you've got China's ascendant who's grabbing this new technology and using it. America invented it. So now it's a race to see who actually implements it and owns it. Because whoever owns this tech will own being the primary reserve currency because everybody's gonna want your tech. So just like the automobile transformed the American economy along transportation transformed the American economy. That was the new tech that we outsourced, about exported. AI is what Trump wants to be our new tech: AI, robotics, space travel, right? This is the in this is the new age, the it's not the information age, it's now the technology age, right? So that's a good thing. But again, just like everything, there's a flip side to it. So this is Steve Bannon, the uh speaker for the populace, and he's pointing out a little bit of a a tricky thing with Nvidia and AI and these chips. Yep, that's great. Huge upside. There's also a huge downside to it as well. So, as a good peasant, we just want to be informed.

SPEAKER_05: 41:39

But the first thing we should do, they're not they're not uh getting ahead of us unless we help them. On artificial intelligence, let me tell you, Nvidia's about to announce earnings that Wall Street's gonna go crazy, he's gonna have a half a billion dollars of backlog for the chips. Jensen, yeah, who's a who's a agent of influence for the Chinese Communist Party, he's an arms merchant. Just let's let's get down to what just think about it very basically. These chips are essentially critical to weaponization. He's an arms dealer. He's an arms dealer, and he'll deal with anybody to do with the Chinese Communist Party. Look at his saying, oh yeah, it doesn't matter if a Chinese company does better if China leaves it. No, that's absolutely incorrect. So the US government and all this stuff about you get you can't have any restrictions on this. You're gonna slip it into the NDA, and one argument's clearly intellectual property, and I appreciate that, and I support that Mike Davis and the team, but that's a small part of it. This is to take off any control whatsoever. You have more restrictions on starting a nail salon on Capitol Hill or to have your hair braided than you have on one of the most dangerous technologies in the history of mankind. Probably the most dangerous technology. A technology has tremendous upside if properly guided, but unguided, incredibly dangerous. And now we know from the leaks that are coming out from the industry and the CFO of OpenAI, you understand that at least the initial financing plan for the rollout of data centers and energy that go with it is uh five trillion dollars. Now, I spent last night with some very smart people about AI. They said, well, actually, that's probably half. It's probably closer to eight to ten trillion dollars. On the five trillion dollar model has put out on uh on uh zero hedge, one trillion dollars what plugged the gap was one trillion dollars was coming from you. The full faith and credit of the United States government. He had all the tech bros last night taking pictures themselves with this.

SPEAKER_08: 43:40

So those Nvidia chips and Steve Bannon's perspectives are just weapons, he's an arms dealer.

SPEAKER_11: 43:46

So not not and not even just that. I was thinking about this yesterday as well, and this is an opportunity for another um bubble. And how do you audit a company like NVIDIA when they are claiming to either produce or have incomes in excess of you know hundreds of millions or trillions of dollars? How do you understand that corporation and and the power that they're flexing and how much opportunity there is for fraud and abuse of that corporation as you're filling money in and out for a company who has produced so far one wafer of chips in America? Okay, so how much did we invest in that wafer of chips so far?

SPEAKER_08: 44:35

If that's the case, if all they've invested is a wafer, then you have a problem. Yeah. But I think what I've seen, and this is what Jet Bezos commented, is yes, some of these AI companies are in a bubble themselves.

SPEAKER_11: 44:46

Oh, yeah. Um no, no. This is aside from the AI bubble, but it is a shell of that AI bubble. But it is part of that bubble, too.

SPEAKER_08: 44:56

So this is what Jeff Bezos said. He said there's gonna be these bubbles, and he's like, bubbles, you know, good, bad, or whatever. Bubbles sometimes mean you're catching up on whole housing inventory, right?

SPEAKER_11: 45:07

So bubbles are kind of gonna happen as a normal uh process of innovation and entrepreneurialism because some people are winners and some are not.

SPEAKER_08: 45:16

And some are gonna oversupply, demand drops, etc. etc. But what he says about this one is unlike the other ones that do end with a husk of what was there, right? You know, million dollars of IPO, you're worth$10,000.

SPEAKER_11: 45:28

It's and I'm what I'm trying to say is that with NVIDIA, with a corporation of this size, it's it would be really easy to pull the wool over on the public.

SPEAKER_08: 45:38

Well, this is what Jeff Bezos was inferring. If one of these businesses goes out of business and the debt gets, you know, lost away through the way debt just gets discharged, he's like, someone will come in and buy up those assets and they're worth something. It's like it's not a dot com burst where you have pets.com that was worth$10 million, but there was no underlying website, right? He's like, what'll happen is when the thing busts, you're gonna be left with the Ford factory. You can still make a car, and we need the cars.

SPEAKER_11: 46:05

Okay, so I'm I'm I'm happy where you're going with this because what happens when there is a bubble and NVIDIA is going to fail.

SPEAKER_08: 46:14

I think this is where Jeff Bezos goes, it can it will fail, but the industry will not. He says, unlike other bubbles, the industry is not a bubble, it's emergent, and the bubble is forming around an emergent industry. And as they throw money at every app program that's touting that we've got some AI capacity, some of them will work. You know what I mean? And some of them will create new file management systems and new auditing systems and things like that, and that will outlast the bubble.

SPEAKER_11: 46:43

But if you hit but but right now, NVIDIA is it. I mean, they're pretty much the only player that's moving into this space in America. Well, and they're gonna be that's not true pin.

SPEAKER_08: 46:53

That's not true because Elon Musk already has one that's better. Oh, okay. And but the the the Elon's doing the Apple thing, it's going in his products, okay. Right? So that is like there are competitors to Nvidia that are direct competitors, but some of them are doing, you know, like Elon uses uh but the scale, he uses he uses something called integers in his chips, whereas everyone else is using floating point, and it allows him to do math faster at higher levels when you're talking about self-driving cars and stuff like that. And so it's a fundamentally different product. So you can't put a Mac chip into a Dell PC. You know, they have a different whatever they do in those little green boards. Yeah. But I think that's the thing, is the tech has advanced to the point to where now another people can come up with other ideas to get around patents and things like that. Okay, and apparently that is proliferating.

SPEAKER_11: 47:48

I just don't want to end up where we have NVIDIA that's treated like a Goldman Sachs and we can't let them fail. Too big to fail.

SPEAKER_08: 47:54

I don't want to end up with another Boeing. The only guy that can make 747s. Right. Too big to fail.

SPEAKER_09: 48:00

Right.

SPEAKER_08: 48:00

So part of this too big to fail problem is Nick Fuentes, right? An incredibly influential youth uh influencer. He's they call they his his community, his followers, they call him groipers. And they're just the white nationalist guy. Yeah, he gets accused of being white nationalists. He's he I I hate listening to him. I don't know anything about him. I hate listening to him because I feel like I'm listening to a clean-cut prison Nazi. I honestly feel like I see it's the same freaking people. If this guy goes to prison six months later, he's got swastikas on him. Okay. Right. Because he'll easily buy into the racial identity culture, right? Okay. Now, on the outside, it's easy to cage that stuff as nationalism and culture and the religious, and you can you can dress up racing. I don't even know what I just called him. I just know that that's the label that gets put on him. You can dress up racism any way you want. Okay. Now, there's a difference between class racism and individual racism. I don't, I'm not claiming that Nick Fuentes is an individual racist. He's a class racist, okay? Very much. I mean, he's come after JD Vance for marrying an Indian. He called her some racial slur. Okay, so he uses that to prove to provocateur, but you have to understand this younger audience, these young 20-year-olds, teenagers, they're looking at a different world than the boomers did when they were growing up. They are not looking at a world where opportunity is advertising. They're sucked into the algorithms online where they're getting sold something constantly. And part of the sales pitch, go listen to the Sean Ryan podcast recently about AI algorithms, is putting you in a place of desperation, right? Because that creates motivation. And so everything they're doing is ultimately to sell you something or to solicit a campaign donation or to get you to take action and do something, right? So they're living in this world where they're in a mind warp constantly. So Nick Fuentes, given everything that's kind of been going on the last couple of years, came out and he gave this little small speech about what the future holds. And he's basically saying the populace, right? The people that are bound to the country, the people that love the country and her people, right? Which then gets converted into nationalism because now you want to take that homogeneous group of people, however, you've painted them, however, you've identified them, and you want to create a political association called the nation, which then can enforce rules on the population. Got it? That's the process. So he's laying out what he believes should be the compromise and the future going forward for politics on the quote unquote right and nationalist Republicans working together, let's say to compel the release of the Epstein files, what kind of approval rating do you think that has?

SPEAKER_19: 50:41

90%? And what if they got together and they opposed foreign aid to Israel? What approval rating do you think that would have? 90%? What if they got together and worked on the basis of a common interest? Do you think that re that Republicans or independents running under that brand? Do you think that that would become more popular or less popular over time? Four becomes eight, eight becomes sixteen. It snowballs. And we need to propel someone into the White House that is just a populist. And here's where we're gonna have to give. This is gonna be the compromise. Very simple. The left has to give up immigration. That's simple. The left is gonna have to give up. Look, we can have equity and we can have um equality in the country, we can have civil rights, we can have all those things. But we have to close the damn borders. We have to close in too many illegal immigrants, too many legal immigrants. That has to be the compromise. The left has to give on immigration, and the right has to give on the free market. If the right can come down on health care and on a social safety net, and maybe on some subsidies for education, and if the left can come down on the anti-white open border stuff and they can agree that we have a country, that party will win 90% of the vote and rule for a century. That's the compromise. That's the populist compromise. Why is it that for the left, it's like they don't even care about anything else? It just has to be open borders. And on the right, it's like they don't care about anything else as long as it's foreign aid to Israel and war in the Middle East and war with Russia. That's that's the kind of program that we need. And that's what they're terrified of. They're terrified that the left and the right are gonna come together on the basis of stop supporting Israel, on the basis of close the borders, on the basis of restricting money in politics, and the influence of the oligarchs. That's what they're terrified of.

SPEAKER_08: 53:02

So all right. I'm gonna make a pronouncement that's a big claim, and they're unusual for me. That right there is like listening to 1920s Adolf Hitler. We need social, we need to do it as a people together, do it for the people, the nation, close the borders, xenophobic, can't have foreign cultures, have to be homogenous. That right there is the is the ingredients of national fascism.

SPEAKER_11: 53:27

If he was uh yelling into the microphone, it would be just like one of the one of what have you ever listened to those speeches and be like, what is he saying? And then you read the the captions of what he's saying, and it's like, we love this country, and he just sounds so angry the whole time. Exactly.

SPEAKER_08: 53:48

But the funny I agree with everything he's saying, but he sounds so angry. No, exactly. What is I love you in German? It's like you know, it's like, whoa, okay. It's like, I don't want you to say that, it's offensive to me. It feels hard. Okay, I'm saying that now. I don't want to be that guy. Oh, that's Hitler. When you go listen to Hitler's build-up before he goes all final solution in the 30s, he would there's a reason he was Time magazine person of the year. There's a reason why the Olympics were in Berlin, there's no reason why they were dragging people around. Look at how clean our streets are and how great our people are. Saddam Hussein did the same thing, by the way. Go watch the Netflix documentary about Saddam Hussein when he brings the Western reporter into the children's classroom and they're like, Saddam, make sure we're all fed. Saddam has changed our economy and make sure we all get education and a job. He's like, look at how well they're learning. And the reformed reporters are like, you're brainwashing these kids, right? That's again the problems that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump address are the same problems. Nick Fuentes is tapped into being able to talk about those problems. These are generational problems, they're not easy fixes. But both of these, all three of them, Trump, Bernie, and Nick Fuentes, offer different solutions. Nick Fuentes is trying to bridge the Bernie bros to the MAGA guys with that young generation of gripers. What do they want? A social safety net and Christian values. I've said this before. The youth that are of MAGA aligned are culturally aligned. They are not economically aligned. Boomers that are MAGA aligned want to preserve their home equity and preserve their way of doing it, but they approve of log cabin Republicans and gay treasury secretaries, and you know what I mean? They don't care about that stuff. They're children of the 60s. They're past it. That is the big divide, and someone is going to win the prize. So if Donald Trump in this administration can't change the outlook of younger generations, you're going to get groupers in a couple years. That's what's going to happen. You're going to get American nationalists. I have no problem with that. But then they're on top of that going to be encouraging socialism. That right there is a recipe to just end up in some form of authoritarian control.

SPEAKER_11: 56:13

Well, fortunately, we have socialist mayors in both Seattle and New York. So hopefully people can see what happens there and we can cut this off real quick.

SPEAKER_08: 56:23

Again, they're going to blame the fact that you can let me tell you what the next generation will say. Socialism didn't work in Seattle or New York, A, because the capitalists wouldn't let it work, and B, because they weren't homogenous enough. You know, I can see the they weren't working together like a family. They weren't in it for each other.

SPEAKER_11: 56:46

I don't know if you could say that as much in Washington as in New York, because Washington is so blue. I mean, the whole state.

SPEAKER_08: 56:52

Oh, but it doesn't matter because if you're white blue, blue dog democrat, you still don't want your social welfare going to the Indian or to the, you know, Latin person. The Bernie Sanders opposed immigration. He called it a Koch plan, a Koch brothers plan. Like they naturally don't like that because they want to preserve jobs. That's part of their platform. Biden got them off track, and I believe that is mainly because we were under attack, right? We this that was not an economic policy. Let's let's prop up the corporatists while we destroy the country. That's that's in my opinion, what was going on there. Now, Scott Bessant yesterday, or two days ago, I guess, talked about all the investment that's come into America to save off the Nick Fuentes future. And again, I'm not saying he's evil. He represents a generation of people. And unless we understand them, Ron, as you and I retire, they will be running the country. Okay. They will be in charge of economic and fiscal policy in our golden years. Okay. So we want to be conscientious to set the stage for success for them so that they can have individual opportunity, so that we can have a cohesive nation, so that we can have an identifiable culture, but not have them turning around trying to make us pay the generations ahead of them for their housing because we couldn't let go of our equity, because we couldn't fix the grift, graft, and corruption in the government that caused rampant inflation that priced them out. Does that make sense? So we've really got to pay attention to that, which is why I appreciate Scott Bessant and the Trump administration focusing so much on local jobs. These jobs that are happening, only a fraction of them are going to boomers. Most of them are going to the younger generation that's been iced out by mass immigration.

SPEAKER_15: 58:43

The president uses the number 20, 20 trillion in terms of total investments. And I think that those commitments are real. And whether it's corporate investments, whether it's the Japanese trade deal where they're going to put in$550 billion, that whether it's the Korean trade deal with$350 billion, whether it's Apple saying that they're going to reshore, I believe that they may be up to$500 billion. So it's investments like we've never seen. And Britt, just to put that in perspective, just to put in perspective, the entire Biden administration was$1 trillion.$1 trillion over four years,$250 billion the final year. And we've got many single investments that are bigger than the Biden administration took in in one year. So this is America's back. The president's done that, our great tax policy. So we're deregulating, we've got tax certainty, and we're working on energy certainty.

SPEAKER_08: 59:49

So all that stuff is setting the stage, hopefully, so that we don't have to have a merger of socialism with nationalism. Let's go to the chats here. Shantini, good morning from Web Michigan. Feels like Seattle here too. Yeah. And you got a plumbing company that is unavailable this morning. Madam Min, good morning. I know Madam Min. She's the sexiest lady on the planet. Pony Boy, I'd like to look into 1776, but my hours don't coincide. Well, Pony Boy, good for you. Almost everything over there is recorded. So you can listen to it at your leisure. So you should still check it out. Get a hold of us. We'll give you the videos and things like that. Because we are in the private, we don't put that stuff out in the public because it's that good. It's that important. John Attack is peasants' perspective shows in my social media feeds now about once a day. That is awesome. I really appreciate it. The reason that's happening is because you, the listeners, are reposting. It makes a difference. It tells the algorithm to share it with other people. So please, everybody that's listening right now, whether you're on Rumble, X, or YouTube, please like, share, and if you'd go so far as to make a comment in the actual show comments, that would be awesome. Any engagement with the show tells the algorithm this show is cool. Push it out to others. So really appreciate that. Uh pony boy says this plumber is full of it. I'm laughing. I don't get the joke. Yeah, that's true. Uh, and I think I know who that is too. Welcome. Antisocialist league. Socialism will fail in blue cities, but they will never accept responsibility. That's right. And that's because the modern communist is a Trotskyite, and they believe it won't be successful until it's universal. So they have just like Islam, they have a universal desire to grow it. Okay.

SPEAKER_11: 1:01:39

I'm trying, man. I had a kid one here. Oh, we might as well read this one.

SPEAKER_09: 1:01:44

Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_11: 1:01:45

Let's do it. Let's see. Boom. Uh gotta wait for my waiting, waiting. I think we have the it's not, it's not working.

SPEAKER_08: 1:02:01

Well, they're not our audience isn't gonna get to hear about the wonderful offer from Rumble Premium. Bummer. Okay, he'll look for one while we play this video. So this is Donald Trump. Um, in the same uh Saudi American investment forum speech, U.S. Saudi investment forum speech, he talked about the election.

SPEAKER_23: 1:02:21

We had the problem two weeks ago on the SNAP, and they talked about all of this uh the numbers. So when I left, which was a rigged election, by the way, but that's okay. You know, I they used to go crazy. I'd say rigged, oh nobody complains anymore, because now they realize it was and it's been proven and it continues to be proven. But when I left, that number was seven billion dollars. Now it's forty-seven billion dollars. That's Biden.

SPEAKER_08: 1:02:52

So if you think about it, if seven billion dollars was being paid out in SNAP benefits, four years later, forty-seven billion dollars was being paid out in SNAP benefits. So is this like a USAID replacement funnel? This was food stamps going to illegal immigrants, and they let 20 million across the border and gave them all food stamps. So we went from a burden, a social safety net burden of seven billion dollars to take care for the widow, the single mother, and the children to 47 billion dollars in quattro years. You know, it only took 60 years of food stamps for us to get to$7 billion. And in four years, we jumped it to 47. And you wonder why the younger generations are frustrated? This happened on I'm frustrated. This happened on our watch. Not my watch, I was in prison. You guys did this. This happened on our watch.

SPEAKER_23: 1:03:50

Who's the same basic thing? Grossly incompetent. He was incompetent, but they're all incompetent because their policies are incompetent. Open borders, men playing in women's sports, transgender for everybody. I mean, they got the worst policy. I don't talk about it too much because if I talk about it, they might change. So, no, I don't talk about it. I tell people don't talk about it. Wait till two weeks before the election and hit the hell out of them. Right?

SPEAKER_08: 1:04:20

He's so freaking funny as a politician, man. Barack Obama couldn't make anybody laugh. I mean, he could hit your inspiration bone from time to time, but he didn't hit your giggle bone. Donald Trump just is funny about it, man. He's so good. Now, Donald Trump talked about the rigged election. This is still a problem. This is not resolved. 2020 is not resolved, 2021 is not resolved, 2022 is not resolved, 2023 is not resolved. Remember, there were elections in all these years. 2027 is not resolved. 2025 is not resolved. Okay. There was a court case down in Texas, and this has to do with redistricting. Okay. Texas was going to gain a couple extra seats, and it ended up in the Supreme Court, like everything does. And suddenly this Trump-appointed judge is the deciding vote to basically not allow Texas to redistrict. Meanwhile, over in California, they're doing their thing. So this post here comes from Kyle Becker, and he's quoting from the uh dissent. So it was a two-one vote on this uh striking down the redistricting. And this is the dissent, okay? Fasten your seat belts. It's going to be a bumpy night. I also need to highlight the pernicious judicial misbehavior of the U.S. district judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown. These are quotes from another judge. In my 37 years on the federal bench, this is out of his dissent. This is the most outrageous conduct by a judge that I have ever encountered in a case which I have been involved. In summary, Judge Brown has issued a 160-page opinion without giving me any reasonable opportunity to respond. I will set forth the details. The readers can judge for themselves. This is the judge writing this. And who's he writing this to? The Supreme Court. Boo. The three-judge district court held a nine-day evidentiary hearing trial for the motion for preliminary injunction. That hearing was conducted Friday, October 10th. The judges immediately retired to confer. Judges Brown and Guadarama voted to grant the preliminary injunction. I voted to deny it. It was understood that the majority judges would begin putting together an opinion. Standard practice. During the next 26 days, there was silence, narrow a word from either judge. On Wednesday, November 5th, Judge Brown sent me a 13-page outline of the expected majority opinion. Quote, so that you and your chambers might be able to pre to begin preparing your dissenting opinion. Nothing else for a week. On Wednesday, November 12th, Judge Brown sent a message stating, we currently anticipate issuing our injunction on Saturday, November 15th. We will endeavor to get you a draft before we issue it. Sadly, we did not believe that we can wait for a dissenting opinion before we rule. The fuse is simply too short in light of Purcell. That's another case. We will, however, note on the opinion that you are dissenting. We are not trying to cut you out. We just don't have time. Ideally, of course, we'd like to have seen your dissent before we issue our opinion, but that will also be impossible. Yes, you heard it right. This is the judge speaking. To summarize, in case the reader doesn't get the point, Judge Brown was announcing that he would issue an opinion three days later, an opinion that I hadn't even seen, and might not might not be furnished before its issuance. That is unthinkable. But it occurred and not accidentally. The outrage speaks for itself. Any pretense of judicial restraint, good faith, or trust by these two judges is gone. If these judges were so sure of the result, they would not have been so unfairly eagle to issue the opinion, sans my dissent. Or could they have waited for the dissent in order to join issue with it? What indeed are they afraid of? This is a federal district judge on an appeals panel telling the Supreme Court these other judges are corrupt. They are doing this for political reasons. They're not following the rule of law. They're not following the customs of the court or the principles laid out by the Constitution and judicial rulings for 250 years. They're rushing it.

SPEAKER_11: 1:08:21

They're going rogue.

SPEAKER_08: 1:08:22

So when Trump says it's a rigged election, they're actively trying to rig 2028 and 2030. And how do I know this? Because they're still pursuing litigation against people in 2020 who stood up to the corruption. This is Jim, Judge Jim Tropis. He was a judge in the state of Wisconsin. He is one of the attorneys who, as an attorney, advising Donald Trump, went to the Wisconsin attorney general and said, hey, we want to do an alternative slate of electors because in the Bush v. Gore case, the Supreme Court had said because there was an alternative slate of electors, they had to make a decision. They couldn't follow the constitutional process, send it to the legislature and the states, blah, blah, blah. And so the Wisconsin Attorney General issued a memorandum opinion telling this gentleman to form a slate of alternative electors. But now they're trying to put him in jail for the rest of his life still for doing that.

SPEAKER_28: 1:09:19

We in Wisconsin did a recount, a legitimate recount. We asserted legal claims that would have taken out over 200,000 votes. Three members of our state Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice of the Court, agreed with us and would have overturned the election in Wisconsin. That's what we did. In order to preserve the President's rights to appeal to the United States Supreme Court, we refused alternate electors. We in Wisconsin did a recount.

SPEAKER_08: 1:10:03

And this man went on in his interview to explain that they are going to put Trump on trial in Wisconsin summer of 2024. And Basic, well, he's not. No. They wrote it in a filing. They are going to drag Trump to Wisconsin during his presidency and put him on trial for this. In Wisconsin, in Madison. Okay. And he's saying, and it and they might even do it in abstention. It's the entire Jack Smith case is live in Wisconsin. All of it. It's live. And they're going to prosecute that whole thing there, he says. Which is why I have turned the corner on the filibuster issue. I now agree with the administration.

SPEAKER_12: 1:10:40

Six months, which is amazing.

SPEAKER_08: 1:10:43

Because you need to make systemic changes to the system in order to prevent this from ever happening again.

SPEAKER_12: 1:10:49

He's in total agreement that we need to let go of the filibuster. It's not serving the purpose that it originally intended to serve anymore. It's really a moot point, and he wants to see it gone so that he can have the most productive three years of any president ever. We've he's already been so productive in his first term. He ushered through the largest middle class tax cut in just six months, which is amazing. There's so much more work to do: election integrity, voter ID, getting rid of universal mail-in ballots. All of that can be done if Congress works together and gets rid of the filibuster. So the president is definitely talking a lot about that, both publicly and privately. I know he's expressed uh his opinion on that to leaders in the Senate who may agree or disagree. We'll have to see how it shakes out. But there's so much that can be accomplished, and we must take advantage of having the most productive president in the Oval Office. You know, Republicans need to get off their butts and move. And that's what the president wants to see them do, and that's what the American people are expecting.

SPEAKER_08: 1:11:46

Imagine if Donald Trump actually could get his agenda put into law and not just through executive fiat. Right. So yeah, we got to get rid of that filibuster. Otherwise, we're going to end up in a Nick Fuentes future. You know, Nick Fuentes for Senate. It's going to be rough. This is a Seattle city council meeting, and things are changing, man. Things are changing slowly but surely. You know, Seattle's got this new mayor that's going to be interesting, but now the city council's like, so I guess we're the adults in the room now. And so uh this this was uh Sarah Nelson kind of going, you know, maybe we should rethink this giving drug dealers drug paraphernalia.

SPEAKER_24: 1:12:25

But I failed to see, however, uh the harm that's being reduced by distributing supplies such as pipes and foil that are used to consume deadly drugs like methane fentanyl. There were 570 uh deaths, overdose deaths in Seattle last year, and 1,047 in King County overdose deaths. And for perspective, a total of 153 people died on our roads in the county in 2024. So I, you know, it's it's absolutely shocking to me that um that uh and I and I think it would probably be shocking to our constituents if we knew if they knew that we are using public resources to um to help people get high by distributing now.

SPEAKER_08: 1:13:12

What she's doing right now is a federal offense. She's burning drug paraphernalia. I know guys who went to prison for drug paraphernalia without residue on it. Okay. Federal prisons. What she's doing right now is a felony. Your city, the city of Seattle, hand that stuff out to drug users every day.

SPEAKER_24: 1:13:33

Pipes, foil with instructions on how to make it round and kind of make it a pipe. This is like it to me, it feels like it's giving a loaded gun to somebody who's suicidal. And um, and if and it sends the the um the I think um a confusing signal to our constituents because we are also spending a lot of money on overdose prevention and substance use disorder treatment, which I fully support, of course, and I and I think that I've I've led on, but just um distributing uh distributing these supplies is um runs counter to those efforts and is also I think cruel in and of itself. It is argued, I will say that the professionals argue that distributing these kinds of of um so-called safe supplies, which I anyway won't comment, um, is a strategy to uh to forge a sense of rapport with people um and then maybe get them into treatment or something like that. That is always said, but the the the times that I have asked um our um public health um colleagues, how many people, do you have any data on how many people have actually gotten into treatment that you've been um interacting with or come and access these supplies? There's never an answer to that.

SPEAKER_11: 1:14:54

Because it's zero.

SPEAKER_08: 1:14:55

We know in San Francisco the homeless industrial complex makes$900,000 per bump. Per. Per bump. Yeah, per and in Seattle it's the same problem. We did this math a long time ago with a billion dollars spent on homelessness. It's like then you divide it by the homeless population. Dude, they could buy them a house. Yeah, they could buy them a house and just give it to them. Yes, but here's the thing: what did we just learn just on this episode? What are they doing in Minnesota with these public things to help people find housing? He's stealing it, he's buying land in Kenya, right? What are you doing about job creation for all these people that are addicted to drugs and have no purpose for life? Oh, we're bringing in Latin Americans to do the work because these guys are, you know, I think it's got our own thing going on.

SPEAKER_11: 1:15:37

I think it's pretty hilarious that Miss Nelson there is like pointing out, like, oh, you mean we spend money to create the problem and then we spend money to fix the problem.

SPEAKER_08: 1:15:46

I think our constituents could be confused. Yeah. Yeah, I think they can we are confused.

SPEAKER_11: 1:15:50

You know what?

SPEAKER_08: 1:15:51

You know what else your constituents are confused? They're like, why are there no police in Seattle? So for the first time ever, Seattle actually officially said what their problem is. City of Seattle 1.2. Explain the reason the project technology is being created or updated, why the PIA is required. So the public initiative. The C City's police staffing crisis, now in its fourth year. What happened in four years ago? Oh yeah. Oh, yeah. The riots of 2020. They're calling it a crisis now, too. Has resulted in over 700 officers departing since 2019. As of January 2024, 913 police officers are available for deployment in the city. Slow down a second.

SPEAKER_11: 1:16:36

Hold on. This sounds like program success because defund the police was hold on, hold on.

SPEAKER_08: 1:16:44

700 police have quit, and you have a total of 913. That means you were at 1600 police. You've lost damn near half the department. The lowest number in off-service officers since 1991.

SPEAKER_11: 1:16:59

That's a good year.

SPEAKER_08: 1:17:01

When this Rodney King riots happened, it's significantly below. It's almost like they know riots leads to decreased policing per capita, staffing relative to comparative jurisdictions. Low staffing lessons also affect investigations, which hinders police effectiveness in solving cases and holding violent criminals accountable. Gun violence, human trafficking, and other persistent felony crimes are concentrated at specific geographic places, and longtime efforts to prevent these crimes have not been consistently successful. Oh, I don't know.

SPEAKER_11: 1:17:32

Could that be the revolving door of criminal behavior that happens in these socialist cities? Weird side note. And it had California license plates. How does that happen? It's an NGO. It's gotta be an NGO.

SPEAKER_08: 1:17:55

Okay. It's gotta be an NGO. Or the NGO is using some leasing company owned by their cousins.

SPEAKER_11: 1:18:02

Right.

SPEAKER_08: 1:18:02

You know, some of all the immigrants.

SPEAKER_11: 1:18:04

That's exactly what I was thinking. And then I thought, hmm, I wonder how many cars in California have Washington place. Is there some kind of reciprocal gimme grift going on here? I don't know. That's a good question. I don't know.

SPEAKER_08: 1:18:16

So continuing here. So now that we've established that we don't have enough police, we can't actually get at crime because we have physical staff shorting. What would be the solution? Implementing technology tools to bolster policing capac capabilities. Interrobocop. As part of a holistic crime prevention and reduction plan is essential to address ongoing gun violence, vehicle theft, human trafficking, and persistent felony crime at specific locations, including within our most victimized communities. The crime prevention technology pilot is one component to this overall strategy of addressing this issue. These technologies will be coupled with police patrols, continued investments in community-based initiatives, and enhanced lighting and cleaning. SPDs propose CCTV, closed circuit television, camera systems would capture video of identifiable individuals, some of whom may be unaware of the recording, despite signage. Without appropriate safeguards, and this raises significant privacy concerns, which has resulted in this review. Recognizing these concerns, FPD proposes the CCTV camera systems will be utilized in a limited fashion and only in public-facing locations. The cameras will face towards the street, sidewalk, and other public areas, and signs acknowledge use of the cameras will be posted. This is what they do in Moscow. This is what they do in Beijing. This is now happening here. Why? Because we don't have enough cops. Why? Because our politicians give the drug dealers drug paraphernalia in order to do the drugs, and they don't get them into treatment programs, and they do cashless bail, which creates a revolving door of people in and out of the system. And this is why they did to begin with, because they wanted the cameras. The problems are universal because they wanted the cameras. Uh-huh. Now, the tide can turn. We do matter. People do matter. In DC, they piloted the no cash bell and okay, we don't have enough cops, let's get cameras. Everything's on camera in DC. It's like it's probably the most integrated. They've got more tech in DC for law enforcement than anywhere else. But it didn't work. Right? So, in an exercise of federalism, go examine what DC did. They followed the same freaking pattern. And now they've had to turn course and reverse. And as of yesterday, they ended cashless bail in DC.

SPEAKER_06: 1:20:33

On this vote, the A's are 237, the na's are 179. The bill is passed.

SPEAKER_08: 1:20:41

And that was the passage of the ending of no cash bell in DC. Your vote matters. Who we put on these councils matters. Even a couple politicians can make a difference. You point out the problem long enough, people will eventually get the point. Okay, another thing that happened yesterday was the Health and Human Services came out with a clarification on a statement that they have forced down the throat of the American population and American doctors specifically. And that's this phrase: vaccines do not cause autism. This has been a clarion call for the medical establishment to smear and deflect from people who claim that there are injuries caused by vaccinations plural of all flavors. Pursuant to the Data Quality Act, DQA, which requires federal agencies to ensure the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information they disseminate to the public. Now, this is an old act, it's not new, it's always been on the books. They ignored it. This web page has been updated because the statement vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim.

SPEAKER_11: 1:21:51

Yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:21:55

That's it. That's it. That's it. Your government was lying to you. Not based off evidence, not based off science, because they wanted to, to serve their own purpose. They're just claiming it. Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to development of autism. However, this statement has historically been disseminated by the CDC and other federal health agencies within HHS to prevent vaccine hesitancy. Just be a good sheep. Get in line. Get your wool sheared. The rise in autism prevalence since the 1980s correlates with the rise in the number of vaccines given to infants. Though the cause of autism is likely to be multifactorial, the scientific foundation to rule out one particular contributor entirely has not been established. For example, one study found that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines had the highest statistical correlation with the rise of autism prevalence among numerous suspected environmental causes. Correlation does not prove causation, but does merit further study. Absolutely. Of note, the 2014 HRQ review also addressed the HEP B vaccine in autism. One cross-sectional study met criteria for reliability. It found a threefold risk of parental report of autism among newborns receiving HEP B. Vaccine in the first month of life compared to those who did not receive the vaccine or did after the first month. After reviewing the study, H AHRQ determined that there was insufficient evidence of an autism of autism of the HB vaccine and autism. It's insufficient evidence of an association. In fact, there are still no studies that support the claim that any of the 20 doses of the seven infant vaccines recommended for American children before the first year do not cause autism. They're flipping it around. They're saying, whoa, we can't say it doesn't cause autism. Here's the pros, here's the cons. Make your choice. Autism's on the cons list. Okay. These vaccines include DTAP, HEP B, HIB, IPV, PCV, rotavirus, and influenza. You are at risk of autism anytime you give a kid those vaccines. It is not ruled out. It is not ruled out. There is no evidence to suggest that those vaccines do not cause autism. It's the opposite of what they've been telling you. The header, vaccines do not cause autism, has been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, which that it would remain on the CDC website. So they took it off. Your doctors fed you bullshit for decades. They didn't read the inserts, they took the company line. End of story. Don't dress it up. They can correct themselves, they can repent, and they can correct their ways, just like all of us can. And we should leave that possibility to be open. I voted for Barack Obama. Okay. I'll cast a cloak of charity and allow you to change your ways. But vaccines might cause autism. That is an evidentiary truth. There is something to look at here. Anyone who claims otherwise can now no longer lean on the CDC as some authoritative guide. In fact, the theity, the CDC just self-owned itself. We've been lying to you for decades. Wait until you find out about how we gave Americans syphilis just to see how they'd react over their lives. Imagine your nose falling off. Right. And then finding out later you were part of the Tuskegee experiments. Imagine. Did they ever get corrected? Did anybody go to jail? Anybody get a life sentence for that? A single person? Oh no. They hid behind immunity. Who will provide remedy and relief for the parents that are caring for autistic children that loaded up on 47 vaccines in the first year of life because they were told to. I know who's going to pay the price, the parents. The kids. But who should pay the price? Yeah, the kids will pay it.

SPEAKER_11: 1:26:07

Now, here it was uh Tucker Carlson. You know, before we go on, I I I just want to say real quick, this is akin to child sacrifice.

SPEAKER_08: 1:26:16

This is. When you hear who I used to call extremists, who called everything child sacrifice, now I understand the spirit behind that. You're sacrificing future generations for today's problems. Oh, we don't want chronic disease. Load up the kids with drugs. That'll fix it.

SPEAKER_11: 1:26:34

Well, you can also flex into um anytime the government is just stealing money, that's the same thing because you're impacting the future generation.

SPEAKER_08: 1:26:43

You're impacting the future. Now, in the name of profit, a lot of pharmaceutical companies have fixed some of our biggest problems, like you know, the sun being the source of all life. In fact, we even call our God the Son of God. And a lot of people think that's because of we were hearkening back to the sun worshippers, right? The sun is very important. And more and more as we understand the human body, we realize that you need the sun. In fact, the sun causes redox, it causes all kinds of healing things. And the whole idea that the sun causes increasingly leathery skin, blah, blah, blah. Did you know that's fake?

SPEAKER_11: 1:27:17

Yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:27:17

You know what causes leathery skin? Lots of sun exposure where you don't get any sun. Okay. And it causes another problem. Sunscreen, not only does it actually lead to skin cancer, which is a scary thought for someone that's as white as you, right? The shade is your friend, not banana belt and but not banana boat sunscreen. I'm definitely a shade seeker. But also sunscreen plays into the autism conversation.

SPEAKER_21: 1:27:44

Part of it is this is gonna sound really crazy, but I believe it. The dermatologists won. They made us afraid of the sun. And now we have these record levels of low vitamin D levels. But we also have record levels of toxins being put on our bodies. So the mom thinks she's really being a great mom if she lathers her son or her daughter with sunscreen. And now you've seen in the last couple of years, sunscreens have come under um a lot of scrutiny because of the toxins they have in them. That if you put it on someone's skin, it goes into their body. What kind of toxins? Like parabens and phthalates. A brand new study where they looked at cord blood and um autism. And the peop moms who had higher levels of phthalates had a five-time increased risk of having an autistic child. So when Secretary Kennedy says we're gonna look at toxic exposure and autism, I'm like, we absolutely should look at that.

SPEAKER_11: 1:29:05

Um anybody that wants to complain about should just STFU.

SPEAKER_08: 1:29:10

Yeah, we're gonna look at this. Yeah, smearing stuff on your body. You know, I didn't realize how absorbent our skin was until I was given a prescription that was topical, that was for hormones. And I was like, How? Yeah, so it's just deodorant. You put it on, and all of a sudden you have a different hormonal. I'm like, so that's going into my body. That was when I stopped using antiperspirant with aluminum because it is a direct correlation with dementia.

SPEAKER_11: 1:29:35

Yeah, you get to step up the magnesium, huh? You get the kind with the magnesium, yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:29:39

Anyways, super interesting. So, yeah. Okay, guys, it is about time for us to jump over to private. We've got one clip before we get there, but I do want to tease private. So, if any of you need to like hurry up and get your rumble subscription or whatever, you can do it. It's too bad we don't have the agrees, right? We're gonna be talking about all these politicians, senators specifically, who Basically, called for insurrection, told military members to defy the chain of command. And we're going to hear from the deputy director of the DOJ with regards to this. Somebody made an interesting comment about this insurrection thing. And I'll talk about that in a second. But when we get over into the private, we're going to be focusing on a video from the deputy director of the D of the Department Bureau of Pris. Okay. Now, I have an optimistic attitude, and my experience through prison was trying to survive every day and kind of maximize myself and work on me and all that kind of stuff. But I saw horrible things, man. Like I saw things that sometimes when I talk about them, I almost have to make light of them. Some things were scary, some things were head scratching, some things were like, how is this prison system serving society? Makes people worse. You know, it's unacceptable to me if somebody goes in there on insurance fraud and gets hooked on how hard. So it changes the way you look at humanity. It changes the way you look at things, yes. And the other thing too is you feel like you're in a system that can't change. And because of my position as a January 6er and becoming the head orderly over facilities, I got to actually talk and spend quite a bit of time with guards and administrative people who shared with me their perspective of the whole system. So we're going to be going over this video in the private. It's worth being there. It is one of those things where when you recognize the role of the BOP, 97% of inmates in the Federal Bureau of Prisons will be reintroduced into society. Nothing has a greater impact on quality of life than those criminals being released into society because they either become a repeat offender or they're reformed. And if prisons don't reform people, all those people are just going through a cycle. But now they're comfortable with prison. Right. So we're going to be doing that in private. So before we do that, let's play this clip from Todd Blanch. Todd Blanche is talking about this insurrection that these senators.

SPEAKER_00: 1:32:10

Does this need to be investigated? And what would the investigation be under?

SPEAKER_04: 1:32:16

Well, the investigation would absolutely be under what these what their intent was in saying this. And the question, we've all watched this a lot today. And the question you have to ask yourself is what is their intent? What is the reason that they all went on a video and encouraged young men and women to defy court orders without even giving a hint of what's illegal, without even giving any suggestion of what law or what order they're being asked to violate? Um, you cannot do that in this country, especially if you're a leader. And so what does the investigation look like? I think they should be held to account. I think that those congressmen should be required to answer questions and to ask answer questions about why they did what about why they did what they didn't deserve.

SPEAKER_08: 1:32:59

Now one of the comments on this was these guys are saying you guys are committing insurrection. You're saying you're they're committing insurrection. One of you is either telling the truth or that word has no meaning. Thomas Paine talks about that. When words have no meaning, what are we doing? Right? What does this mean? If the king has a patriarchal duty, why does he not treat us like his children? Why does he not care for us? Why does he subjugate us, hurt us, harm us, injure us, murder us, rape us, tax us? The word has no meaning, right? And all of the if if you don't live in a democracy and you live in a totalitarian government and your elections aren't real, you do not live in a democracy. The word has no meaning.

SPEAKER_11: 1:33:40

Well, I would also say that once they started attaching the word insurrection to J6, it already at that point lost meaning.

SPEAKER_08: 1:33:49

Exactly. So the comment here is somebody has to do something. If these words have no meaning, then how do you know when someone's really committing an insurrection? Right? It's the same thing with traitor. Don't call Barack Obama and Marjorie Taylor Green a traitor in the same sentence. Put them up against the wall and shoot them. Otherwise, shut up. Use a different word.

SPEAKER_11: 1:34:12

Yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:34:13

Some words have to carry some weight. I learned this lesson very well during my trial. Don't hyperbolically say burn down DC. They'll take you serious. Okay. Don't hyperbolically say, I want to kill an FBI agent. They'll put you in prison for life. You'd been better off killing them. You'd have got 20 years. Okay. These words have to mean something. So now the pressure's on, Todd Blanche. You went on TV and talked about this. Oh, we're going to look into it in investigation. Are there going to be subpoenas, indictments, some smaller charge to discourage this behavior ever again?

SPEAKER_11: 1:34:46

Are we going to change Black's Law Dictionary?

SPEAKER_08: 1:34:48

Or are we just going to change Black's Law Dictionary? Insurrection is anytime someone puts out a meme. All right. All right, guys. We'll be jumping over it in private. Please don't forget to join us for 1776live.us. Head on over there and register for tonight's ignite. And with that, we'll talk to you guys in the private and the rest of you tomorrow. Bye. Okay. So two things I wanted to cover here before we get to, or one thing I wanted to cover before we get to this BOP video. So this is Ackman. He floats immediately actionable blueprint to free Fanny and Freddie. When I read this and I read an explanation about it, I thought this might be the way. And this might be the only way to save the whole system. In a Tuesday presentation on X, billionaire founder of Pershing Square Capital Management outlined a three-step proposal he says would meet the Trump administration's policy goals. While restoring the companies to private market discipline, the plan comes amid White House struggle to ease housing costs, which include an absurd idea to roll out 50-year mortgages. The two government-sponsored entities, GSEs, underpin roughly half of America's$12 trillion mortgage market. They don't lend directly. Rather, they purchase mortgages from banks and lenders, package them into securities, and guaranteed investors against losses. This system helped keep keep credit flowing through economic cycles. Pershing is the largest common shareholder in the two corporations with over 210 million total shares. Ackman has long argued the government's post-crisis control of the two companies, Fannie and Freddie, which is formalized in a 2008 conservatorship, was intended to be temporary, but has dragged on for years beyond its stated purpose. He proposes the following as an immediately actionable roadmap for the Treasury and Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates GSEs. Now, before we get into this, I need to make a point clear. You are the money. Banks do not lend money anymore. They buy securities. You write a promissory note or you fill out a loan application. That creates a bond, a promise to pay. You are both the creditor and the debtor. The bank simply bought your debt and then monetized it, turned it into dollars, and lent it back to you. And they make the arbitrage, okay? Servicing fees. That's all banks are doing in terms of credit. People believe banks are holding on to large deposits and they're lending out. You know, if I've got a million dollars in the bank and I go get a home loan for$100,000, I'm borrowing from Joe Schmo's million dollars that he's got on deposit. That is not happening. So what I'm about to explain changes the game because it acknowledges your position in the whole scheme as the creditor. Step one, acknowledge the bailout is repaid. Fanny and Freddie received$187 billion from Treasury support during the crisis. Excuse me. Ackman noted the GSEs have since sent hundreds of billions in profits to the federal government through quarterly net worth sweeps, far exceeding the original rescue. He urged Treasury and FHFA to formally declare the obligation satisfied, a move that would mark a symbolic break from the financial crisis era. Step two, make taxpayers official owners. As part of the 2008 rescue, Treasury received warrants, that is the permission to go spend money, to buy up to 79.9% of each company's common stock at a nominal price. Exercising those warrants, Ackman said, would convert taxpayers' implicit economic state into a formal controlling interest. So basically, if you bought a house, you would now own the underlying mortgage. So now you actually pay interest to yourself, increasing your net worth because you now own the debt. You still have to pay the debt, but you're paying it to yourself.

SPEAKER_11: 1:38:47

Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 1:38:48

Keeping the integrity of contracts in place while acknowledging your true position as the creditor and ultimate surety in said contract. Okay. As part of the 2008 rescue, Treasury C for I already read that. Step three, return GSEs to the stock market. Fanny and Freddie were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange after entering conservatorship. Ackman said the companies now meet listing requirements and that relisting would restore liquidity for investors, broaden ownership, and help recapitalize the firms. He argued that with taxpayer ownership approaching 80%, the resulting equity could be exceed$300 billion. The proposal intersects with a broader debate over the future of U.S. housing finance, a politically delicate realm that has eluded reform under multiple administrations. Supporters of privatization say the GSE should operate with market discipline and adequate capital. So taxpayers are insulated from future downturns. Critics warned that premature release of inadequate safeguards could encourage the kind of risk taking that contributed to the 2008 collapse. Critics, haters, the reality is we're collapsing.

SPEAKER_11: 1:39:51

I did not realize that Fannie and Freddie were in a conservative ship and were not being traded. So yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:39:56

And also what that means is foreign entities own your note. They hold the trustee in a filing cabinet in China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, London. So if you foreclose and the bank forecloses on their home, why don't you get the home since you're the creditor? You don't because those guys bought your bond. So the taxpayer owning the bond means when they foreclose on the home, the hand doesn't change hands to a foreign entity. Right? That's how they steal your land. As Thomas Jefferson said, you'll wake up penniless and homeless on the continent your forefathers conquered. Why? Because you gave the issuing power of credit to the banks instead of the people to whom it properly belongs.

SPEAKER_11: 1:40:36

Right? That all just makes sense.

SPEAKER_08: 1:40:38

It does make sense. Big changes. A move like that could avert the Nick Fuentes nationalist socialist merger of the future. Okay, because you've got to get ownership back to the people. Right? Totally different thing. When you own the underlying mortgage and you're paying interest to yourself, that's different. It's totally a different game when some foreigner owns that note. Okay, so now let's jump into this from the BOP. This is a little bit of a longer clip, which is why I saved it for private. And there's really no way to clip this. It's just pretty good. So we're gonna play it. I'll probably pause it a few times. Thank you, those of you that are sticking around. I want to get this on the record. A lot of our listeners that listen after we're live do listen to the private. They are subscribers. So I do get that feedback a lot. So I I want to make sure this has a lot of good content, especially the longer form stuff. This is good. This is something I saw firsthand. He's reinforcing the things I saw. And in my opinion, by acknowledging the problem, is the only way to be able to move forward constructively.

SPEAKER_27: 1:41:44

A little over a hundred days ago, I was sworn in as Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. An honor bestowed upon me by Director Marshall, who, alongside Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, have made clear our mission to restore transparency and accountability to an agency left in shambles by the previous administration. And unlike President Trump's first administration, plagued by an entrenched deep state within the Department of Justice, who often worked to undermine his reform efforts, his current administration now has the right leadership in place. And that leadership empowers Director Marshall and I to confront these challenges head on. In my first hundred days, I visited approximately 20 facilities, spoken to hundreds of staff, and met with dozens of stakeholders. I collected unfiltered feedback from everybody. And what I have found is an agency in dire straits, a mess that we've inherited from the Biden administration, and decades of failed leadership that will take years to repair. And we're going to expose the truth and hold those responsible accountable. We walked into a$634 million shortfall from flat budgets of the past administration who ignored inflation, hid unfunded pay raises, and slashed retention incentives. Staffing is catastrophic. With the Biden administration eliminating 3,500 positions in his final year, leaving this was something that I saw.

SPEAKER_08: 1:43:29

Guards were exhausted. They work double shifts and they work an eight-hour shift, so it's a 16-hour day. Some guards even stood on for 24 hours. You had nurses acting as prison guards at like in the hallways and stuff like that, because they had to take a rotation on guard duty when they were pr nurses, right? They had to put on the uniform because short staffing. They have the phrase for it where you're ordered to take a different job for the day. So, like I would have days where uh my boss was working the lunchroom. Why? Because they're short staffed, causes exhaustion.

SPEAKER_27: 1:44:02

Critical areas like psychology and medical services understaffed, causing burnout and mandatory overtime for the rest. The government accountability office has called this one of the worst staffing crises in federal government history.

SPEAKER_08: 1:44:30

I was in a cell with a broken window. It was a big window with bars exposed to the elements all year long. Wind blowing straight in there. We had to put cardboard up, then they'd confiscate the cardboard, they'd yell at us, floor would get all wet. It was nonstop.

SPEAKER_27: 1:45:14

Staff and inmates' suicides have also surged, a heartbreaking outcome as a result of deficient health and wellness support and chronic staffing shortages. Internal affairs has a large backlog. Misconduct cases have festered poisoning trust and morale amongst our staff.

SPEAKER_08: 1:45:34

The prison I was at had a captain that came from FCI Thompson. Thompson was a federal penitentiary that got shut down because in one calendar year they had like 30 or 40 deaths. What? And then when they investigate them, these were all happening in the wreckyard. Why were they happening in the wreckyard? Because the guards were doing cage fighting matches.

SPEAKER_11: 1:45:52

Oh my gosh.

SPEAKER_08: 1:45:54

It was fight club. They were taking bets. So I was in a transfer center in Oklahoma with a bunch of people that were being shipped out of Thompson and they were telling me all about it. What really got it was they found a gun in an inmate cell. Oh, and that was all right, we're done. So they converted it to a low, and they do it when they do that, they kind of have a process to revamp the camp and get everybody separated out and redo it. But the captain came from there with allegations of heading these fight clubs, and he was the captain in my prison. And he was an asshole. He was horrible. Nobody liked him. He was a horrible person, a horrible human being. Okay. And then my uh the unit team manager who was in charge of us also came from there.

SPEAKER_09: 1:46:38

Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 1:46:38

And where do you think all the complaints went? Her desk. And the round filing cabinet she had next to her desk. Okay. She was my unit manager, the one that was in charge of telling me when I could or couldn't go home and what halfway house I got and all that kind of stuff. They were under investigation, allegedly. She also came from another facility where she had a complaint about all the backlog of complaints that are made that she wasn't processing through the system. Um, I could go on and on about anecdotes that I saw from her of just blatantly illegal activity, like reselling contraband to inmates, you know, confiscating stamps. You're not supposed to have loose stamps, you know, because that's our money, and they try to hack, but it happens. Well, you know, if they want to target you, they'll confiscate your scamps. Well, then when an inmate would come in and they were like, Oh, I need stamps, like, well, you can buy them for me. And there's a whole bunch of loose stamps I've confiscated.

SPEAKER_09: 1:47:29

She's like, Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 1:47:31

I mean, it's the little things, right? When you do something little like that, what else is being done?

SPEAKER_27: 1:47:38

First step act. The first step act was sabotaged by the Biden's DOJ and VOP. They have mismanaged millions meant for FSA implementation, building a time credit calculator that has never worked right, and FSA programming required by the law never materialized. Instead, they hired an outside contractor that blocked every outside program submitted by some of the most impactful faith-based organizations. They only approved internal BLP classes, and despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars, the BLP still only added 100 halfway house beds in six years.

SPEAKER_08: 1:48:18

$100 million for 100 halfway house beds. Okay. This all these things he's talking about, FSA, the calculator. I should have been getting out in 2026 at the latest 2027, but I could not get my case manager to acknowledge that. 2030 is your release date. Yeah, but I'm earning time. If you calculate it, can I get an idea like 26, 27? Nope, 2030. You have to earn the time. Okay, well, there's some programs I can take, like I could get into an RDAP program and other things, and that would cut a year. Oh no, you can't get into those programs until you're basically ready to go out the door. Then we put you in the program so you don't get a year off your sentence. The whole thing was like messed up. In fact, I had endless conversations with an accountant who was in there for tax evasion, who had a finance master's in finance, so he could do math in his head like crazy. And he figured out his first stepback benefits, and he had a year-in-a-day sentence, which means you're supposed to go home after like four months. Well, they held him until he served his full year and then sent him to a halfway house after his sentence. And then he got to the halfway house, and they're like, oh, well, we have to keep it for 30 days. He'd be like, I'm beyond a year. It's the process. There was another J Sixer who qualified for FSA at a release date into a halfway house, and there was a drug program he was supposed to take that they didn't tell him about, and he missed the class. They auto-enrolled him. Again, did I mention they didn't tell him about it? They auto-enrolled him. He missed the class, and they took away his halfway house and told him he had another year to serve. Oh and he had to get a congressman involved and all this stuff. And when it ultimately came down, a sympathetic counselor printed off an email for him, said, You don't know where you got this. Call your people, let them know about this email. The jail had conspired to keep him there by basically denying him his rights because they didn't inform him of this class and writing like they're supposed to do his signature wasn't on the side. Just so they could have a body and a bed. You're in a cell. What do you put? What do you get out of a cell? I don't know, like a battery cell. And what does a cell do? It creates energy. And how much how much do they make per bed in the BOP?$4,800 a month plus whatever you're programming for. We had one guard to 150 inmates on my block.

SPEAKER_27: 1:50:24

It's pretty profitable.

SPEAKER_08: 1:50:25

It's pretty profitable. And they still couldn't fix my window.

SPEAKER_27: 1:50:30

Think about that. Only 100 in six years. All while re-entry services division lost over 90 critical positions. They diverted hundreds of millions of First F Act funding into non-FSA programming and unrelated projects that they just labeled FSA. This mismanagement squandered taxpayer money and undermined public safety. Technology at the BOP is terrible. While working on 1950s mainframes that have hindered operations in every division, training has been slashed to the bone, leaving staff unprepared for their mission. Lockdowns and collective punishment have become knee-jerk reactions.

SPEAKER_08: 1:51:18

And unions, they added a I spent a lot of time on lockdown. For no reason, knee-jerk reactions. Collective punishment. Punish them collectively.

SPEAKER_27: 1:51:34

Another dynamic.

SPEAKER_08: 1:52:01

He was a jerk. He ran the tool room. So I had to go get tools from him. I can't I mean, not that there's like a high expectation for customer service. But hey, I have a broken drill. I need to turn it in and get another tool. Because you know, they regulate that stuff because you can make a shank out of it. So you got to turn in the broken drill bit. Nope, not doing it. Why? Because he's watching The Simpsons. Oh, okay. I can see him watching The Simpsons. Not doing it. Come back later. Well, I I mean, I mean, I know productivity is not like a high priority for prisoners. You know? Jerk. Like, jerk. Set inmates up. Blamed, you know, if he had an inventory problem, well, who can we send to the hole so that I don't get written up? You see what I'm saying? Complete jerk. Even the guards hated him. Eventually, they cycle positions. He moved to another spot and he became, he had to guarded the T. This was a hallway T where you know you turn off to go to commissary and facilities, or you kind of there's the lunchroom in chow hall entry and exit. So there's it's a T. It's the main hub for the whole prison, the T. So the T is where you get shook down. When you walk by the T, you're, you know, that's where there's a gaggle of guards. That's where the metal detector is, that kind of stuff.

SPEAKER_09: 1:53:15

Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 1:53:15

So the T is like the place. So when I first got there, we had a couple guards that worked the T that were jerks, but they moved on into the DEA and FBI, right? But when this guy would go to the T, he would incite arguments. I remember, you know, cop commissary has a certain way you do it. Everybody goes and gets in line, and it's just a way that they do it. Inmates kind of self-regulate the line. Well, this guy would come in and what line's gonna start here today. Well, it always starts over here. Starting here, you guys back of the line. These guys got up early to get in line, and now you're making them go to the back of the line. If anybody even looked cross-eyed at him, he'd get into their face, push them up against the walls, you know, spittle on him as he yells. Then if they said anything back straight to the hole, we wouldn't see that guy for 45 days, solitary confinement. Over and over and over. Union head, nobody could do anything about him. Even the guards couldn't complain about him because he's their union rep. That's what he's talking about. Those union rep positions become coveted positions because the union rep can smuggle, he can be a jerk, he can abuse inmates, and who's gonna complain about him because the union has to protect other people, and you gotta go through him to get protection.

SPEAKER_27: 1:54:21

The BOP has been consistently voted the worst place to work in all of federal government. Uh you think the DMV is bad? Damning indictment of years of neglect, low morale, and eroded trust. Leadership and accountability have been non-existent, with both the OIG and GAO all but calling them incompetent. Instead, saying it was, quote, BOP leadership's inability to effectively address challenges, end quote, which I think was putting it pretty nicely. This is the hand that we've been dealt. A bureau on the brink, scarred by decades of failure. And despite warnings against taking this role, I'm here because President Trump, Attorney General Bondi, and Deputy Attorney General Blanche reject the status quo. They have given Director Marshall and I a mandate and the support to turn the BOP around. With the enactment of President Trump's one big beautiful bill, we are slashing waste, cutting the bureaucracy, and fixing the Biden administration's wage betrayals. The Big Beautiful Bill provides the BLP with$5 billion and an incredible opportunity. It's going to enable us to fill the 3,500 necessary staff positions cut during the Biden administration's final year and hire an additional 587 new correctional officers.

SPEAKER_08: 1:55:51

By the way, there's only 120 federal prisons, so to fire 3,500, an impact across the board.

SPEAKER_27: 1:55:58

It also reverses the prior administration's dismissal of training as nonessential, restoring funds to ensure our staff receive the essential training that they deserve. President Trump's$5 billion investment ends the legacy of neglect, paving the way for modernizing facilities, implementing advanced contraband detection technology, and overhauling our mail procedures, all to keep our institutions safe and secure. It's past time to turn this agency around. We are responsible for holding some of the most dangerous people in our society. 97% of those that we have in our custody are going to be released back into our communities. That is why there is no other agency in all of law enforcement that has a greater impact on public safety than this Bureau of Prisons. This is a fact, and we need to get it fixed, and we need to get it right. Wow.

SPEAKER_08: 1:57:05

What a great statement.

SPEAKER_11: 1:57:07

Reform is obviously necessary.

SPEAKER_08: 1:57:09

I'm telling you, man, it's easy to be like, there's a problem. What are you gonna do about it? That's the place where nobody out here gets to have any interaction or no. And when people come out, you can hardly believe the stories. You can hardly believe them. I mean, when was the last time you saw a race riot at the ball? You know what I mean? When was the last time you had lunch with Nazis? You know what I mean? Yeah, I'm so glad to see them doing little changes. The First Step Act really gave a lot of inmates hope, but then it became a point of contention with the cadre, with the staff, because you couldn't get what date you were going out. And then you'd find, like, I remember one inmate, he had a 10-year sentence. Now, with First Step Act, at about 40%, you should be in a halfway house, about 50% you should be on home confinement, and about 55 to 60% you should be on probation of your original sentence. Okay, right. And the feds, you don't like good time is 15%, and you they usually you lose all of it by the time you serve your time, right? So first step's a big deal. I talked to this guy, he's got a 10-year sentence, first step qualified. He's been in prison for three and a half years. I'm like, you should have a halfway house date in six months. And he's like, Well, no, I have to take RDAP. That's their drug program. And you get a year off of your sentence with that. I'm like, well, he's like, yeah, they're not gonna let me take RDAP till next year. I'm like, but you'll be at four and a half years. And then you have to take the program, which is a year, to get the year off, which would put you at nine, which then would put you down to where you should be home right now. I'm like, you should be home right now. And he's like, What are you talking about? So I put it on a paper. I showed him, you know, they gave us packets to with the law. I do the math, and he's sitting there and he's like, he's gelling. He's his life now, right? He's been there three and a half years, he's gotten used to it. So he just gave up. He gave up. Well, I mean, you can't hold the can't hold the prison accountable.

SPEAKER_11: 1:58:54

Yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:58:55

What are you gonna do? Fill out a complaint so you can get a chance.

SPEAKER_11: 1:58:57

I know, but he mentally gave up too. Huh? He mentally gave up, too. He mentally gave up, yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 1:59:01

Yeah, but he's sitting there going, You mean there's hope? Like you could go home now? It's like, yeah, you should get on these guys. Like, you should be in RDAP this second. You should be going home, right? When you finish RDAP, you know, like what's apathy, not caring, trying to not implement the plan, trying not to give Donald Trump credit. These all played played into it. Another big new, another big piece, last thing for the for you unoffendables stuck around at the very end. Knox Williams, president and executive of American Suppressor Association, commented on Cicada's nomination to head the ATF. So this is uh American Suppressor Association helped get the charges for my friend that got machine gun charges because of suppressors, their weapons of mass destruction, got all the charges dropped from the suppressor company. They have a guarantee we'll represent you because we do not violate ATF rules, even though they're gonna charge you. So they they fronted the uh uh attorneys to basically get their stuff dropped from his charges, but of course they threw some other stuff at him. If confirmed, he would be the

SPEAKER_30: 2:00:58

I didn't know you were called Dennis. You didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say something about the old woman, but from behind you looked objective, they automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh king, I am very nice. How'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress. It's some lovely still. Oh how'd you do? How'd you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the Who? The Britons. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes. Oh, there you go. Bringing classes with a game. That's what it's all about. If only people would live. Please, good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you, we're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see. By a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quiet, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of Momat. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. Who I didn't vote for you? You don't vote for kings? Who are you become king then? The lady of the lake. Her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water. Signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet! I mean, you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tarp through a sword is shut up. I mean, if I were around saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened big had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, will you? Shut up! Now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up! Have we seen the violence inherent in the system? Help, help! I'm being repressed, bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?