If Self-Government Is Real, Why Do The Rich Decide?

A storm outside sets the mood for a bigger tempest: who actually makes the decisions that shape our lives? We start with wonder—a comet spitting colossal jets—then move straight into the machinery of influence, from a small set of global stakeholders to prosecutors who admit they’re venue shopping. The throughline is uncomfortable but clear: when laws are flexible for the powerful and rigid for everyone else, trust collapses and the system begins to look like theater.

We unpack January 6 without slogans, contrasting loud narratives with quiet cases where misdemeanors still meant raids, ruined finances, and reputations. From there we ask how operations—political, media, legal—become governance by other means. The conversation widens to Venezuela’s cartelized state, a record tanker seizure, and why starving illicit revenue can be more decisive than speeches. Along the way we examine coalition fractures at home—like MTG’s CodePink moment—and what “building bridges” means when those bridges carry disinformation or foreign influence.

Public health and agriculture bring rare bright spots. Mercury’s exit from vaccines and tighter guardrails on gain‑of‑function research signal a belated turn toward precaution and transparency. Support for regenerative farming offers an off‑ramp from brittle, chemical‑dependent inputs. At the local level, we confront how ranchers maintaining long‑standing stock ponds can suddenly be treated as violators, and why the real fight is over who interprets and enforces the rules. Economics aren’t abstract either: deportations and self‑departures ripple through housing and used‑goods markets, reminding us that policy has a people timeline.

If self‑government is to mean anything, enforcement must be principled, not convenient; funding must reinforce public well‑being, not pressure points; and we need to stop pretending outcomes are accidents. Listen, think it through with us, and decide where you stand. If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a review—what lever of power do you think matters most right now?

Chapters

• 0:00 Storms At Home, Comet In Space
• 2:10 Strange Jets And Alien Speculation
• 3:20 Who Rules The World: Elite Stakeholders
• 6:30 J6, Lawfare, And Team Politics
• 12:45 Venue Shopping And Weaponized Justice
• 16:20 MTG, CodePink, And Bridge Building
• 20:10 Venezuela, Cartels, And Elections
• 27:20 Tanker Seizure And Regional Fallout
• 32:10 Laws Versus Enforcers: Power Captured
• 36:40 Deportations, Housing, And Market Shifts
• 39:40 RFK Jr.: Mercury, Gain Of Function, Farming
• 45:30 Ranchers Targeted And Federal Pushback
• 50:10 Vaccines, Funding, And Political Spin
• 53:00 Closing Thoughts And Comic Relief

Transcript

SPEAKER_03: 0:59

What are those people? What are those people? Good morning, peasants. Welcome to the best episode of the Peasants Perspective Ever. So glad to have you here with us today. Best ever. Best ever. Yeah, it's raining. Washington's getting swept clean. We are uh what taking out the trash with the rain? Is that how you could say it? Right on. Actually, I really apologize to anybody whose house has been devastated by the Shadowsphere River. There's like some serious rain going on right now.

SPEAKER_08: 1:33

There is. There is some serious rain, serious flooding. There's a lot of people that are evacuating some certain areas around here.

SPEAKER_03: 1:39

Yeah, it's pretty wild. Now, up in our neck of the woods, it's just kind of raining. We're not really a flood area. No. We don't have rivers and stuff like that. We're not we're not prone to that. Our county, I should say. Our county is like small man and creek creeks. Nothing gets to build up to be a river here because we're a peninsula. We're surrounded by water. So it's like half a mile that direction, half mile that direction, you're gonna hit the ocean. Yeah. So, anyways, pretty cool. Well, this is a good episode today, and we're gonna try to make it short. So we're gonna roll through this thing. John Attackis, it's it's a great morning. Yes, it is. Glad you guys are here. Okay, so something that we have talked about, I haven't talked about for a few weeks, though, is that comet that's flying through our galaxy right now. Apparently, it's doing some funky stuff.

SPEAKER_24: 2:22

We have no explanation of phenomena like this. Yeah, look at that. So these are interesting. Avi Loa, among other people, have taken some of these images and they've drawn these vectors.

SPEAKER_15: 2:35

Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_24: 2:37

So you have up to five here in this image, but seven different apparent jets coming off of three eye atlas post-perihelia. What's wild about these is massive, massive, twenty-three thousand kilometers long, some of these jets. How is it that we have these what appear to be somewhat discrete jets coming off of three eye atlas? It's not common to see tens of thousands of kilometer jets coming off of these things.

SPEAKER_03: 3:12

So here's what I think that the conspiracy space theorists have decided that this is a foreign body that is exploring our galaxy and it's ignoring Earth. Apparently, it's doing like a flyby of like Saturn, Mercury, Venus, like all these other planets it's gonna get really close observations of, but it's gonna miss the Earth. But it's doing all kinds of weird stuff out there. So, anyways, I'm just saying, you know, Elon Musk said there's no evidence of aliens, but there's always the three-eye atlas. Anyways, I just find it really funny. Apparently, it's not gonna destroy Earth. We were all concerned it was gonna take like a hard right and hit Earth. Uh, one of the things that Tucker Carlson had to say on the uh what's his name? It's this comedian. Uh Theo Vaughn. Theo Vaughn's podcast was he was talking about who really rules the world. Now, Tucker Carlson is the originator of one of the catchphrases I use all the time. We have to live here, right? We have to live here. Your policies affect us. He's just pumping up, filling up the gas tank this morning at$4.07 a gallon for the cheap unleaded. And I thought, gosh, I wish I lived in Missouri.

SPEAKER_08: 4:15

You should have done one of those uh reply to those TikToks for the two dollar gas.

SPEAKER_03: 4:19

Oh gosh. I know. Well, it just look at that and you're like, my state just took, you know, I filled up a small vehicle. I'm like, my state just took$35 in taxes for you know, half of my gas tank went to Washington State for what? I don't know. I have no idea.

SPEAKER_08: 4:33

Giving the Eagles driver's licenses. Oh, that's another great thing. That$2 a gallon gas, that's about how much we pay in taxes.

SPEAKER_03: 4:40

That is what we pay in taxes, man. It's brutal. It's brutal. We're the I think we're the highest gas tax state in the world.

SPEAKER_08: 4:46

We're always buying for it. It's either us or California.

SPEAKER_03: 4:49

Yeah. So Tucker Carlson is the originator of the we have to live here phrase. And he g he gives this little explanation here about who rules the world. And listen, this is it. I endorse this. This is my working premise of on what's really going on. I've said this many times. You go back to season one, before I was ever involved in J6, I was like, there's a thousand people that run the world. They have different affiliations, different nationalities, completely different, but there's a thousand people that really control influence and levers of power, have the right politicians, bot, et cetera, et cetera. And we don't really know who those people are. Yep. You know, I mean, I assume Donald Trump's in the category. He clearly has some control of some things, right? I assume there's probably a couple senators out there that control huge swaths of influence campaigns and whatever. I'm sure there's some sheiks and whatever, but it's not a homogenous group. It's just an elite group of stakeholders.

SPEAKER_23: 5:38

And I think at this point that if all the information on all these different threads, whatever it is, especially the murders, not just the recent murders, but the or attempted murders, but the um, you know, the more historical ones. If all the relevant information came out tomorrow, would we be surprised? No, we wouldn't. We we we know what's up actually. And there's enough evidence, but also our instincts tell us just by watching, like, what is this? And I agree with you completely, it's not just about Israel, this country, it's about whether or not self-government actually exists. Like, do any of these countries have a system where the people decide who their leaders are and what the country should do collectively? Or or it's more complex than that. Yes, I think elections are to some extent real and all that, but in the end, the big decisions are made not by nations or kings or presidents or whatever we imagine they're made by you know, the world's richest people. And I d no, I don't think that's an ethnic group. It's not code language for the Jews. It's it's what it seems to be. It's the people with the biggest stake in this who have the most to gain and the most to lose, are never gonna leave the big decisions to like three zip codes in Pennsylvania. Like, come on now, come on now. Come on, son. Like, you know that that's true. And I'm not saying, by the way, I'm not claiming, you know, the all elections are totally rigged or whatever, the source code belongs to Maduro. I'm not making any specific claims like that because I don't know if they're true or not. But I know the big picture if we we know that Kennedy was pushing up against some forbidden things, and that's why he was killed. And who killed him? Well, it's not it's too easy to say it was this group or that group or this group. It was all those groups acting in concert, or parts of those groups acting in concert. Of course. That's all of what this is, right? Do you feel that? I I I like what you said about uh if all the peace and I agree.

SPEAKER_08: 7:42

I think at this point that if all the people were there, I was just smiling how they cut Theo off.

SPEAKER_03: 7:47

I disagree. Yeah, exactly. But I agree with that. It's it's the rich, it's the elite, and they're not necessarily all allied with each other. Some of them probably have huge, you know, competition with each other or whatever.

SPEAKER_08: 7:59

I I got on a they could be pulling levers that oppose each other at certain times, you know.

SPEAKER_03: 8:05

I don't know what I was thinking yesterday, but I got on a two-hour-long spaces talking about J6 and talking about, you know, some alleged settlement, some alleged settlement, or we're working with attorneys to get the settlement, right? But they were basically saying nobody should ever get paid because it sets bad precedent. Uh, this was a huge operation. You guys have to acknowledge your role in the operation. America was injured by this, not you guys, you're not victims, blah, blah, blah. You know, just like a lot of kind of like hate coming from the conservative side. But I've I've realized there's this swath of middle grounders, right? And maybe sometimes I kind of flirt with this line. But you've got your people who play team play on teams far right, far left, red, blue, Republican, Democrat. And it's kind of like my team can do no harm, right? And you don't really want to police your own team very much. You know, you only want to police people who really hurt the party. But if their crime involves going against the enemy, you ignore it. Does that make sense? That seems to be like the team play.

SPEAKER_08: 9:00

Sounds like you're no good cops argument.

SPEAKER_03: 9:02

Yeah. So there's people that are like, everybody at J6 was a hero because they were standing up against a stolen election. Those are the team play guys. Okay. It's like, well, hold on. There's some individual accountability.

SPEAKER_06: 9:11

Okay.

SPEAKER_03: 9:11

And then you've got the other, so those are the team play that you find on both the left and right. And then in the middle, you find this weird swath of people that I call ideological purists. Pam Bonnie needs to be fired. Well, who should we put in? Some other person that I can complain about. Some other person that won't be good enough for me. Right. Now, I'm telling you, I flirt with this line all the time. Maybe I am sitting in the middle of this camp, right? Like, no one's ever good enough. But the purity test, right? Oh, you can't hire that attorney because 15 years ago he was involved in some other thing. And it's like, have you ever considered that the reason I hired him is because he was involved with that and I felt like the system was weaponized against him and he understood what we were up against better than others? You know what I mean? Like, like, and but this the premise of a few of these arguers on this spaces was this was an operation. Duh. We all agree.

SPEAKER_06: 10:00

Okay.

SPEAKER_03: 10:00

But then it was honing in on individual J6 defendants as in their part of the operation, right? People like me comparing me to Ray Epps, and somehow I'm like, no, I reacted independently. That's why my show's only got 12 people on it right now. Otherwise, I'd have thousands of people because I'd have a team behind me to promote my show, right? And they were like, well, look at all these influencers who got caught up in this. And look, you know, they're part of some paid operation. I'm like, yeah? Listen, there's nothing wrong with an op. That's what political parties do. They create narratives, they create ops. There's good ops. If I'm running an influence operation, I might happen to go and put my name on a protest permit because I want to influence Congress. Does that make sense?

SPEAKER_19: 10:40

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 10:40

So I'm like, you've got a lot of operations happening. Every single person who pulled a permit, every group who pulled a permit, they all had their own reasons and motivation, most of which did not include overthrowing the United States on January 6th, right? It appears to me the group that was most trying to overthrow the government was embedded in the government itself and sending feelers out into a few of these little groups to, you know, turn things or create different narratives. And so I just found it really interesting because I'm like, you guys, you know, yeah, we want to get to the truth, but at the same time, I was personally injured, right? I could go make my claim and say, hey, the system was weaponized against me, et cetera, et cetera. And and it was just baffling to me who these guys are like, now, you know, and they kept mentioning the same four or five prominent J6ers who are still out there kind of causing a lot of noise. And I'm like, but there's 1,580 of us, and you're ignoring, you know, all of them. And even if you carve out the people that were Antifa affiliated that got wrapped up in J6, you're talking about like a hundred-ish, 140, something less than that. I'm like, you're still talking about a big mass of people. We're talking four or five, seven forty-sevens of people, you know what I mean, that were had that system weaponized against them. I'm like, you guys use some prominent example of someone who went overboard on January 6th, but what about my buddy Scott out in Puallop that got misdemeanor charges and had his house raided, and his daughter had to address and undress in front of agents and you know, misdemeanors, yeah, misdemeanors. What about the guys who sat in jail for misdemeanor charges? You know what I mean? Part of an op. They're getting we can't, we can't pay people that are part of an op. Hold on. You're blurring all this line here, right? The J6 thing, obviously, with the pipe bomb arrest, still hasn't gone away. They just postponed his next appearance in court. The prosecution and the defense agreed to postpone it. I'm hoping this is a door where they're like, hey, we got the wrong guy. Yeah. Hoping that that's like the let's pump the brakes before we get too far down the road situation. Let's expose something. But I have my doubts. They're probably just, you know, working out an early plea deal or something like that. Ray Epps did the same thing. He got arrested, one misdemeanor charge. 30 days later, you know, two months later, extremely fast in the federal system. He's taking his plea deal in front of Judge Bosberg, getting no jail time. One year unsupervised release, because your wife's already been ruined enough.

SPEAKER_19: 12:58

He was the initial breach.

SPEAKER_03: 13:00

He put the sign up with the people, right? Meanwhile, Kamala Jayapal here, our, you know, Washington state representative. Oh boy. He wrote to the downtrodden and uh savior of the immigrant. Donald Trump incited the deadliest attack in our Capitol since World War, since the War of 1812. There must be accountability. My lawsuit against Trump is our last chance in the courts to make sure that Trump faces the consequences of his actions. We won't stop fighting. This is it, the last chance to hold Trump accountable for J6. Several lawmakers. Really? Is this the last chance? No one forgets the most shameful day in U.S. history and they're playing the long game. Makes me a little nervous, by the way, whether they're playing the long game, because I'm gonna be here for a while.

SPEAKER_08: 13:43

Yeah, me too.

SPEAKER_03: 13:44

But they kind of shot themselves in the foot. Earlier this year, they passed a bill. It wasn't this year, it was uh a little while ago. They passed a bill that was, let's see, it's uh it's public law 117-103. And what it was supposed to do was it was supposed to memorialize, let's see, memorialize the injured officers and other officers and different, you know, government officials that uh participated in defense of the Capitol on January 6th. Well, this plaque has not been posted yet, and that's a problem for Harry Dunn, who's suing the hurry up and get this plaque posted in the Capitol. Well, the architect of the Capitol replied to this lawsuit and said, Yeah, we got a list of names of all the agents and law enforcement officers that are involved in J6 to make this this plaque, and we haven't done it yet. Do you know how many agents are going to be on this plaque? Yeah. 3,648 names got submitted to the architect of the capital for responders that need to be honored for January 6th.

SPEAKER_08: 14:47

Is Ray Epps on the honored?

SPEAKER_03: 14:52

This is wild. This is wild, okay. I don't know what their cutoff line is, I don't know what it meant to be on this plaque, but you're talking about 3,000. Like these guys are supposed to be honored for their defense of the 3,000.

SPEAKER_08: 15:09

I can't wait to honor them. Huh? I can't wait to honor them. Let's let's get the list.

SPEAKER_03: 15:15

No wonder they haven't made the plaque. A, it'll be a big plaque. B, it's gonna have a lot of people on it that probably don't watch recognition. Holy smokes! Right now, government is in the business of protecting government. This is in Michigan. This is a um, I can't remember what this guy's name is, uh, but he's testifying to the house, and he's talking, they have a recording of a high-ranking attorney general employee caught on take admitting to weaponization of government. Here's the full clip.

SPEAKER_04: 15:46

That's I read the text. I'm gonna play a quick clip here. This clip uh involves uh um criminal bureau chief Danielle Hageman Clark. You'll hear her speak. It also involves a detective sergeant from the Michigan State Police, and this is a discussion that's gonna be had after a proffer has been proposed to an individual, and the individual leaves the room. And the only individuals left in the room are, as I mentioned, uh Ms. Hageman Clark, uh, a couple of state police, uh detective sergeants, another staff member from the attorney general's office, uh, as well as two special agents that both work for and directly to the attorney general's office.

SPEAKER_03: 16:29

Okay. These are all cops. Every single person left in this room has a gun, a badge, or arrest and prosecution power. Every single person in this room, when you're in their presence, your rights are imperil. Okay. Every single person in this room falls under the umbrella of cop, law enforcer. Okay. I often say there are no laws, there are only cops. And it's because of shit like this. Okay. This, every trooper in the room, every dep, every person in the room should have turned on each other and said, you're under arrest for violation of civil rights.

SPEAKER_04: 17:12

So this is them discussing what they're going to do in regard to a case against an individual prior to choosing the venue.

SPEAKER_24: 17:33

There might be stuff after we break it down, but I'm good for right now.

SPEAKER_22: 17:39

I like a money. Yeah, I to me it seems like, and uh, you know, we can do whatever however you guys want to do this, but if we can prosecute anybody in Oakland County versus Ross Common County, love you guys step up there. I'm not down with trying to pick no Russian common jury. I really like Mary BB. I think she's a great prosecutor up there, but I don't want to be picking a jury of her peers up there on this kind of crap.

SPEAKER_05: 18:11

Did you hear those words? Did you hear those words?

SPEAKER_04: 18:17

I'm gonna I'm gonna reiterate a couple of the sentences that were in here. I'm not down with trying to pick no Rascommon jury.

SPEAKER_03: 18:29

Now, our founding fathers felt like you shouldn't have a choice as the prosecutor where to put a jury. It's where the crime was committed. They're venue shopping. The prosecution is venue shopping. Openly. Oh yeah.

SPEAKER_04: 18:42

Well, he'll explain it. I think she's a great prosecutor up there. But I don't want to be taking a jury of her peers up there on this kind of crap. It was crap.

SPEAKER_03: 18:53

The charges they had were crap.

SPEAKER_04: 18:59

That's the bureau the criminal bureau chief of the attorney general's office.

SPEAKER_03: 19:22

Violating the very preferences of our constitution.

SPEAKER_04: 19:29

Item D. Engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of the justice. We just heard the number one criminal attorney from the attorney general's office articulate the fact that they knew that there would be a bias against them if they tried a case in Roscommon County. You want to tell me there's not a weaponization going on in the Attorney General? Any attorney sitting on this panel, for that matter, in our legislature, should be filing a grievance on this. It's a complete and utter violation.

SPEAKER_03: 20:14

Filing a grievance with the people who caused the grievance. This was the problem we had in prison. Oh, I'm gonna file a grievance on you. You want to be popular? I get punished while you investigate.

SPEAKER_08: 20:28

You're gonna be popular really fast.

SPEAKER_03: 20:30

That's all the there are no laws, they're only cops now. You know, at least it's being exposed. That's the beauty of America, right? But that's what we're up against as peasants, as people, right? You you cross power, and it's like you can have a law that says, Thou shalt not weaponize government, and they're like, Great.

SPEAKER_08: 20:49

Well, and we heard them point it out, but we haven't heard what are they gonna do about it?

SPEAKER_03: 20:54

Yeah, what are you gonna do about it?

SPEAKER_08: 20:56

I don't know.

SPEAKER_03: 20:57

The solution here is impeachment, but how do you impeach someone when you have legislatures that are very bought off?

SPEAKER_08: 21:08

Again, that's why you get a bunch of inaction, I guess.

SPEAKER_03: 21:11

Totally, it's wild. MTG did something yesterday that really was bad. Really bad.

SPEAKER_08: 21:21

What'd she do?

SPEAKER_03: 21:21

Aside from her media darling tour and going out and being like, you know, I was so hyperbolic and rhetoric, and I use such strong language, and now I've learned to reach out across the aisle. Yesterday she did something absolutely stupid. Before we talk about that, though, we're gonna listen to Matt Schlap, who's who uh runs CPAC, and he's explaining exactly why MTG is on the outs and why you just can't do what she did. Think about it. Just look at it on its face.

SPEAKER_00: 21:49

And we'll start with you and you get your pick. Which do you want to talk about? Henry Quayer or do you want to talk about Marjorie Taylor Green?

SPEAKER_11: 21:56

I want to grab both, but I'll start with Marjorie Taylor Green since that's my side. But um, look, nobody kissed a president's posterior like Marjorie Taylor Green did in Georgia to become his friend and to get accepted by Trump and to speak at his rallies. And, you know, when it was all good for her, she thought he was great. And uh, and then she made this false comparison. Uh, as somehow, uh, if you stand with Trump, you're not for young girls being prevented from being raped.

SPEAKER_00: 22:27

And I think or is she for transparency saying that let's get the record down Epstein?

SPEAKER_11: 22:33

Is it that's a different statement, right? Between the idea about how much transparency you have in government and somehow Donald Trump is okay with little girls being raped. Did she say that, or did she say the record should be released? She said on standing up for 14-year-old girls, and that got me in trouble with the president. And I really think that is where there is a big problem here, which is you can disagree with someone politically. And if she's going to disagree with Donald Trump, don't accuse him of being someone that's for the rape of young girls. That's outrageous. That's the trope that the left always said about Donald Trump, right? They had all these false allegations they're always pushing on him. And this is the problem with all this, which is she makes it sound like she's a victim. She makes it sound like she's getting death threats because she took on Donald Trump when a lot of us has have faced that because we stood with Donald Trump. And when did it get be so poisonous to be with Donald Trump? You might disagree with him on the Epstein files, but nobody should then, if you like the man, should then say somehow that he's aiding and abetting uh young girls being raped. I have five kids, I'm offended by her doing that.

SPEAKER_03: 23:35

And that, I believe, is where her influencer personality got the better of her. I can get a lot of clicks, I can get a lot of attention, but it's coming from the wrong people. Oops, which then goes to show yesterday this is the truly abhorrent thing she did. Look at this picture here. So this is code pink. Okay, code pink.

SPEAKER_08: 23:55

Wonderful.

SPEAKER_03: 23:56

I love Palestinian liberation.

SPEAKER_08: 23:58

Oh my god.

SPEAKER_03: 23:58

Now, this gets pretty scary. So this is what she posted. I'm America first and fully against funding foreign wars and support peace, because that's good for everyone, especially the most innocent people and children. Well boy. I have enjoyed a friendship with media, uh Medea for a few years now, even though politics says that's not allowed. For a few years now? This is Code Pink funded by Neville and Soros. Okay, for a few years you've been friends. I've learned to find bridges with others, and that's how we all win and ultimately leads to peace. So self-admitted, self-admitted snake in the grass. So you went from, you went from you're they're with us or against us. We're either gonna drain the swamp or not, to we need to build bridges across the swamp. Please don't drain it. I have my entire retirement plan invested in the weeds. You know what I mean? In the lilies. Well, let's find out exactly who she is. We go to Data Republican, small R. Thread, the history of Medea Benjamin, the co-founder of Code Pink. Jody Evans gets the most of the attention as the co-founder of Code Pink, and Neville Singman's wife, Neville Singman, who's he? He's the uh American billionaire that lives in um Shanghai, who made all of his money basically spreading CCP propaganda. Totally a CCP person, right? He and his wife. While creating the linked thread below, I dived into Medea uh Ben uh Bijaman uh briefly, who had an interesting history of speaking to Chinese media. She co-founded Global Exchange with her husband, Kevin Don Hair, which goes on a number of reality trips to various closed countries like Cuba, Venezuela, among others. You followed me long enough, you know that's a big red flag. So then she goes on. She received a notice from Code Pink where they're like, hey, just FYI. We are writing to formally address the uh and correct faults and defamatory statements made by your social media claims regarding Code Pink. These claims, which falsely allege the organization is funded by China, the Chinese Communist Party, CCP, or any foreign government at all, are entirely baseless, faults, and libel. So then she goes through to explain Code Pink, 25%, funded by Neville Singman, who is living in Shanghai and got rich off spreading CCP propaganda, and is under investigation by Congress for FARA violations. AKA, he's funneling money. He's a foreign representative. Code Pink is running a campaign called China Is Not Our Enemy, which promotes pro-China messaging, including denial of the weaken genocide and atrocity affirmed by the U.S. Department of State. Founder of Code Pink's Jody Evans is married to the aforementioned Neville Singham.

SPEAKER_08: 26:29

Anyways, it goes through and she just for the no-spin option.

SPEAKER_03: 26:34

This is a non-starter for a Republican. Yeah. It's a non-starter. It's it's like well, that's it. What's the problem with Margie Shirley Green? That right there. She built bridges over the swamp. Instead of draining it, she just made pedestrian traffic easy. You know what I mean? Like, like she didn't do anything. That's how she got rich. She built these bridges. You know, she planted her her garden in the swamp. And why would you go on and say, well, Trump's defending, you know, rapists? It's like, yeah, because you don't want to drain the swamp. You know, you did the counter-narrative thing. Anyways, now, you know, it's not like here in Washington we're foreign to um Republicans kind of being idiots. Uh, a bill titled An Act Related to Foreign National Participation in Washington State Elections has been pre-filed by Democrat Representative Joe Fitzabant. Now, I'm not even surprised, right? Of course, you know, the Democrats, they just want foreign money. Absolutely, yes. If we can't get local donations, let's get foreign donations. Act Blue's been doing it for years, but it was co-sponsored by Republican Representative Chris Corey. That would allow foreign nationals to fund political campaigns. Why? Why? Why do we have a Republican co-sponsoring this? It's a non-starter. It's it's it can't happen, right? No more bridges. No more bridges, okay? Drain the swamp once and for all. Good gravy. Again, there are no laws. There seem to only be cops here. There's only that thousand people really running the world. The rest of it feels like a Truman show illusion. For example, here's this guy, uh, Charles Johnson. Charles Johnson is under indictment for, or excuse me, Charles Johnson. So who's Charles Johnson? Charles Johnson is a far right, you know, far right wing blogger and former Clearview AI co-founder, often referred to as Charles Johnson. He's currently in jail in Johnson County, Texas. And right now, he he had a civil racketeering case. Okay. So he had a civil racketeering case for whatever his companies were doing, and he was found liable for up to$71 million in one ruling. Okay. So some huge civil libel case. Now, I hate these things, right? Because it's so hard for us as peasants to really know what's going on. Because we've watched a train of people get chewed up in civil litigation that's nonsense. Alex Jones, Donald Trump. Uh, you can go on and on and on. This civil litigation, right? And I mean Ruby Freeman and Rudy Giuliani, that whole thing, like, so it I don't even know what this means.

SPEAKER_08: 29:00

Yeah, that's kind of why I go, all right.

SPEAKER_03: 29:02

Okay, yeah, all right. So, anyways, as a result of those charges, he didn't produce some documentation, probably trying to, you know, stand on his rights or something like that. And so he's being held in criminal contempt in a court in Texas. However, in the court in Texas, where he's being, or the jail in Texas, where he's been held 18 days now, okay, without a hearing or anything like that, is under indictment, uh, is is uh in a prison where the sheriff is under indictment for witness retaliation, sexual harassment, and aggravated perjury. So the sheriff of King, uh Sheriff, Johnson County Sheriff Adam King was arrested by his own deputies in August and booked into his own jail as after Texas Rangers' investigate investigation accused him of harassing multiple female employees and threatening staff who reported him. Basically, he's just a creep slime ball inside the office, okay, doing highly inappropriate things with the women. So he gets arrested, and now he's got some deal. He can only come into the office like three days a week, and he can't contact like seven of these witnesses that he was trying to influence after he was arrested, the whole thing, right? But he is holding this whistleblower guy, because I guess he's also whistleblower with the whole AI thing. You know, they're trying to control us with the control grid, right? So they're he's it calls into question how you can put someone under the supervision of someone else that clearly is in the category of someone who would retaliate against someone that you've gotten incarcerated. And has someone who's been an incarcerated, you have stripped them of all of their ability to defend themselves and to fight back and to speak and to have all of their rights. Okay. I don't know if this guy should be in jail for contempt. That's one thing. But the judges or whoever does this, they've got to have a brain, man. You've got to have a brain. Okay. The appearance of conflict like that is tricky. Uh, one of the things, too, with weaponization of government, Donald Trump, as you know, pardoned the representative from Texas. And a lot of people accused him of did you make a deal or something like that? That's not what happened at all. In fact, Donald Trump is pretty upset that this guy's running again and he's running as a Democrat. I think probably Donald Trump hoped he would have flipped sides. But here he is going back to the very party that tried to put him and his wife in prison and took out money from the government to offer him as a bribe, which he refused, and then they put the money back, and then they charged him with a conspiracy to accept a bribe or something stupid like that, right? But yet he went right back to the body.

SPEAKER_11: 31:29

If he had secured an agreement from Congressman Quayar to not run again or to run as a republican, that would have been the legal problem. President Trump didn't leverage the pardon. He gave him the pardon because he thought he got screwed by a woke prosecution team. And that is Trump on these types of questions. He's a lot of heart, and he really uh he really commiserates with those people who are victims of lawfare. And he did it here, and he's shocked that the congressman doesn't say, why would I stand a party that was trying to put me in prison?

SPEAKER_03: 32:02

That's the real question. And these guys are horrible. They'll put presidents of nations in prison. This is the Honduran president who was convicted of, you know, drug trafficking, all by himself, by the way, purely based off the testimony of two previously convicted drug traffickers who got out of prison after they provided testimony. So he's been recently pardoned. He was on Matt Gates' show explaining this weaponization and why they targeted him. Talked about this law fair, Mr. President. Which, by the way, the reason they came after the representative was because he was like, hey, no, you got to close the border. I'm in a border town. Right? He opposed he opposed the Biden regime specifically on the topic of immigration. Not abortion, not transgender, not any of that stuff, specifically immigration. Because you know, it actually does affect the people in his constituency.

SPEAKER_09: 32:44

Talked about this law fair, Mr. President. What role do you believe the Biden administration played in pushing for your conviction? And what do you believe their motives were?

SPEAKER_20: 32:55

Well, it is a fact that when I started to work side by side with President Trump, when we signed the third country agreement with Honduras, but also I went to talk to several uh presidents in Central America to do the same, it started right there. And you can follow the posts and the expressions of people who were in the in the in the Biden campaign and uh attacking me uh because of that.

SPEAKER_09: 33:29

Uh so you believe that they were targeting you because you took positions on migration that would not have allowed for uh open borders and people just moving through Honduras and Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala uh unchecked. You think it was a consequence of your border policies?

SPEAKER_20: 33:50

For sure, for sure. It was like that.

SPEAKER_03: 33:55

When I see this guy, I'm like huge drug trafficker. If his brother got indicted for drug trafficking and he was asked by Gates in this same interview, he says, you know, what about your brother? He says, Listen, I told the authorities, the feds, who came down to Honduras, if my brother's trafficking drugs, I'll deliver him to you. Right? So do your investigation. But they, you know, they got him first and they got the brother, I don't know what order, it doesn't even matter. And now that he's out and he's looked at his brother's case, he's like, Yeah, I'm gonna fight for his freedom too, because they set him up. This is and you know, we are watching things come out like this, and we're seeing behind the curtain on the weaponization of government. This is an existential threat to we the people.

SPEAKER_08: 34:33

Yes.

SPEAKER_03: 34:34

It's an excess, you know, and you can't have a a take on this when you become informed that it's like, yeah, I don't know whose side is who, but I know that if it's against we the people, we've got to resist us. We've got to resist, you know. Now, this stuff going on as Venezuela. Clearly, I'm in the camp that Venezuela was involved in rigging elections around the world. You know, they're they're they're you know, a cartel, basically, you know, everything that we allege that they are.

SPEAKER_08: 35:00

And but there's like they might be doing a bunch of other stuff too, but that's the stuff that's most important to us at this moment.

SPEAKER_03: 35:07

Yes, which is odd because you know, we haven't really thought of Venezuela ever. You know, oh yeah, Trendiagua, a bunch of gang members coming up from Venezuela. No, it's more than that. That's an invasion force. You know what I mean? It's like you gotta see it for what it is. Um, years and years and years and years ago, I remember saying what was happening at the border was an invasion. This was still under like the Obama administration. Some guy online is like, it's not an invasion. I'm like, No, it's an invasion. And I promise you, now that I've been to prison and met some of these people, like I was in prison with Trend de Agua. They lived in the dorm, like I'm still trying to wrap my head around. And I had to wait in line with them to take a shower.

SPEAKER_08: 35:36

You know, I'm still trying to wrap my head around. I can't believe that we're even talking about Venezuela when it comes to our election process at all. It's like, why are we talking about machines that are in some other country when they should be in Pennsylvania or Ohio or you know?

SPEAKER_03: 35:51

And that's even conceding that we shouldn't should have machines. Right, exactly. So Maria Machado, who was the recent Nobel Peace Prize winner from Venezuela that got the Nobel Peace Prize over Trump, but then praised Trump. I haven't heard a lot from her. I didn't know too much about her situation, but she's now the second person that's been elected in Venezuela that they have said, no, Maduro won instead, right? So she was asked, because some big things happened around Venezuela yesterday. We confiscated a huge oil tanker. We'll talk about that in a second. And so she's being asked, are you afraid of a U.S. invasion? Are you afraid of, you know, boots on the ground and what the U.S. is doing? She fled Venezuela yesterday and made it to Switzerland, by the way. So she's in Switzerland giving a series of interviews. And in the interest of time, we're gonna have to skip some of the other stuff. But this one was really interesting. This is the woman who just won the Nobel Peace Prize, is likely going to be put in charge of Venezuela or at least return there so that she can uh do her magic. And I listened to her and I was like, oh, oh, uh, I understand why you won a Nobel Peace Prize. Uh I get it. She's a truth speaker. That's all that's all she's doing. She's grandma, just saying what it is. She was asked, what do you think about the US invading Venezuela?

SPEAKER_17: 37:00

Um yesterday uh the US seized uh a ship outside of the coast of Venezuela. Would you welcome a US military intervention uh in Venezuela?

SPEAKER_00: 37:13

Look at that. Some people talk about invasion in Venezuela, uh the threat of an invasion in Venezuela, and I answered Venezuela was has been already invaded. We have the Russian agents, uh, we have the Iranian agents, we have terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas operating freely in accordance with the regime. We have the Colombian guerrilla, the drug cartels that have taken over 60% of our populations, and not only involving drug trafficking, but in human trafficking in networks of prostitution. Uh so this has turned Venezuela into the criminal hub of the Americas. And what sustained the regime is a very powerful and funded, strongly funded repression system. Where does that fund come from? Well, from drug trafficking, from the black market of oil, from arms trafficking for human trafficking. We need to cut those flows. And once it happens and repression uh is uh weakened, it's over because that's the only thing the regime has left violence and terror. So we ask the international community to cut those sources because uh the other regimes that support Maduro and the criminal structure are very active and had turned Venezuela into the into the safe heaven for their operations into the rest of Latin America.

SPEAKER_03: 38:40

That makes sense. Wow, yeah. We've already been invaded. What are you talking about? That's how I felt on that J6 call last night. I'm like, We're there. We need to pick a side now. It's a zero-sum game.

SPEAKER_04: 38:53

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 38:53

Somebody has to win and somebody has to lose. You're either gonna have to hate your white skin in your old age, or you can just be a white guy. You can either embrace transgenderism and the disintegration of the nuclear family, or you can take a stand for it. You can support free and fair elections and a Republican form of government, or you can support democracy and mobocracy. Right? You can support the rights of the individual to stand against the nation with parity and with equal justice under the law, or communist. You can just have cops and no laws. You know what I mean? She's like, we're already invaded. This harkens back to when in Aurora, Colorado, two apartment complexes were completely taken over by the Trendai Agua gang and they were being run. Cops could no respond, you know, that's theirs. And Martha on the news is like, well, it's just two apartments. Well, wouldn't you like to stop the invasion when the first guy crosses the border rather than the millionth guy? You know, how many apartments is too many? Should we just give them Aurora? Should we just, you know, do a siege on Aurora and let the people who just have to live there? Suffer? We're already invaded. We already have the highest percentage of foreign-born population in the United States. We already have the amount, 50 million illegal immigrants with the vast majority of them on public charge.

SPEAKER_08: 40:18

It wasn't that long ago, and 50 million was our entire population.

SPEAKER_03: 40:22

Yeah, it was like turn of the century not that long ago. Okay. It is stunning. Right now, they took over this boat, and here's what Trump had to said about say about it.

SPEAKER_16: 40:45

No, I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to the United States. I haven't given a lot.

SPEAKER_03: 40:52

Excuse me, this is about the president of Colombia. He's next on the list. Okay.

SPEAKER_16: 40:56

He's uh he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Colombia is producing a lot of drugs, they have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into the United States. So he better wise up. Or he'll be next. He'll be next, too. I hope he's listening. He's gonna be next.

SPEAKER_03: 41:20

What's interesting about that is Venezuela is involved in the actual rigging of elections. That's the thing. Yep, that's the you can no longer exist, you can't have safe haven. You try you overthrew my country. Okay. So that is the acute Venezuela that has to stop. And I think obviously you need to go scorched earth and our local election systems and get rid of machines and all that kind of stuff, because that can never be put at risk again. Colombia is a drug partner to Venezuela. Does that make sense? Yeah. So they're next, but then you know, we've ignored the drugs forever. Because at the end of the day, it is just cocaine, right? So he's next, but Venezuela's the target mainly because of the election. So after yesterday, when they seized that tanker, which here's some footage of that big tanker being seized, I actually watched this and I thought, you know, it's like a big deal to take over one of these boats, man. Like it's you can see the Black Hawk helicopters, guys are. I got to do that one time in the ROTC, go down the road. Um, these guys are going in. I thought, you know, when you're when like building clearing is one of the most challenging things you can do. Oh my goodness. I saw a video of practice versus real life for clearing buildings. And in practice, right, they're like clear, they're doing like room sweeps, clear, you know, they're not shooting, they're clearing each room. And then it said real life, and it's just guys putting their guns around the corner. Yeah. Clear it's like building clearing looks like in real life.

SPEAKER_08: 42:50

I've I've seen one of those too where they go into a building to clear it, and then gunfire erupts and they just start blasting through all the walls, and then they're like clear.

SPEAKER_03: 42:59

Yeah. Anyways, going into a ship like that, all the tight little hallways and things. There's a lot of little hiding spots that poke up on you.

SPEAKER_08: 43:08

Yeah, those boats are huge.

SPEAKER_03: 43:10

Yeah. And they took one. Apparently, this is one of the biggest ones, one of these ghost boats, and it was heading to Iran. I'm all in. I'm all in. I'm all in.

SPEAKER_08: 43:20

I know you're gonna put the clip of uh what are they gonna do with the boat, right?

SPEAKER_03: 43:23

And then Trump's like, I was gonna, yeah.

SPEAKER_08: 43:26

I hope they we just keep it. And I was thinking, what what would they what would he say if they say, uh, what are you gonna do with all the drug boats? Well, I hope we just keep them.

SPEAKER_16: 43:37

Sell the cocaine back in an interesting day from the standpoint of news. As you probably know, we've just uh seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela, large tanker, very large. Largest one ever seized, actually. And uh other things are happening, so you'll be seeing that later, and you'll be talking about that later with some other people.

SPEAKER_03: 44:07

I don't know how many tankers have been coming and going, but my suspicion has been since they've kind of locked down the coast of Venezuela, they've been holding back. They can't get drugs out, they can't get stuff out, and you know, to subject a country the size of Venezuela, because you know, tax revenue doesn't get you very far, they have to sell those dru drugs and things to create the funding. So you know, I don't know how dry their coffers are getting. My my my guess is they've got billions to burn, but that's a huge hit. Yeah, that's a huge hit, and it's significant. That normally would be viewed as a total outright hostile act of war.

SPEAKER_08: 44:42

Yeah, the other the other thing I was thinking about was no, do we not recognize them to be able to do it? No, I know that they want to get the oil to cut off the oil supply and the funding and all that, but what if it's not just oil on that boat?

SPEAKER_03: 44:52

Oh, certainly. There's almost no chance there's not other things on the boat as well, right? It is probably mainly oil, but I mean, even if you just say in small quantities, you know what I mean? Yeah, there's a pound of coke on the boat. Well, there shouldn't be any coke on the high seas. Well, there's green plugs.

SPEAKER_08: 45:09

You could probably hide a hundred tons of coke.

SPEAKER_03: 45:12

I know, but I'm just saying, like, it's like, you know, you know what I mean.

SPEAKER_08: 45:17

Yeah, you know what I'm saying.

SPEAKER_03: 45:19

Yeah, guaranteed they found drugs. Quantity, you can debate. Now, Marco Rubio reminds the uh people of the world that Maduro isn't actually a legitimate regime. So when you're like, oh, you're attacking Venezuela, are we?

SPEAKER_01: 45:31

Not only do we not recognize him, 50-something countries around the world do not recognize Nicolas Maduro as the rightful president. He's not the president of Venezuela. That's a title he's given himself. And that's not just us saying it. That was the, by the way, that was the policy of the Biden administration. And that was the policy of the first Trump administration, and that's the policy of 50-something countries, including multiple countries in the region, do not recognize him as the president of that country. What he is, is someone who's empowered himself of some of the instruments of government and are using that to operate a drug cartel from Venezuelan territory.

SPEAKER_03: 46:01

He empowered himself to use some of the instruments of government. He captured the instruments of government. If you're ideologically captured and you become, say, the um lead criminal prosecutor in the state of Michigan, what would it look like to capture some of the tools of power? Is that not what it looks like? Is what the Biden regime did with opening the borders with Alejandro Majorcus not capturing the tools of power and you know, hitting the open button on the garage door? You know what I mean? Like that's what that's what a takeover looks like. This is what an invasion without a shot fired looks like. An influence campaign, which then leads to elections with who knows what going on, right? Which then leads to taking over the tools of power and ignoring the law as written. That is what has happened. I guarantee you, Venezuela has all the laws on the books to prevent all the horrible things that are going on down there. They're just not being enforced. Because there aren't really any laws. There are only cops, the people who enforce them. A law is only as good as a person who's willing to enforce it. Ask any parent who's raised a terrible two-year-old. We have immigration laws too. As a parent, you get to see in your own home how life really works. Right? When you see have a little child and you give them a boundary or give them a rule, a threat, and you don't follow through. Did you really give them a threat or anything? Or you just negotiated with them? You know what I'm saying? That that's that's yeah.

SPEAKER_01: 47:28

Much of that drug's aimed at reaching the United States. So we're not going to have a cartel operating or just masquerading as a government operating in our own hemisphere. He's indicted, he's a fugitive of American justice. There's a reward out for his capture. And by the way, related to that, the president of the United States made clear that he's not going to allow cartels, that cartel or any other cartel, to operate with impunity in our hemisphere and send drugs towards the United States. And he's going to use the U.S. military and all the elements of American power to target cartels who are targeting America.

SPEAKER_03: 48:00

Because my gang is bigger than your gang. That's the message. Okay. So let's let's listen to some pretty good news. This is really interesting. This is a foreclosure guy, one of these guys that posts note notices of for for notices of foreclosure. And uh the last couple of years, and I used to be real big into foreclosures, flipped like 250 houses. And the last, you know, what started to happen, the reason I got out of it was because the New York REIT showed up at the local auctions and they were like paying full price for stuff. And it really pushed out a lot of investors here. And but then what started to happen was the housing market got caught back up, right? And we've had very low inventory, very low levels of foreclosure, because for the most part, if you put a for sale sign in the yard, even if you bought your house last year, you had enough equity to sell it, right? So not a lot of people were going to foreclosure. Most foreclosures happen within like the first five to six years of someone buying a house. So he's doing posting foreclosures. Good news, Ron.

SPEAKER_12: 48:54

This week I started doing foreclosures on undocumented properties. Properties that the people had to leave in a hurry. I just left one, pizza boxes open, pizza was still there, all the food was still in the pantry. They grabbed whatever valuables they could left everything else behind. These are foreclosures, so these are homes that were bought using FHA. Guaranteed by the government for undocumented people. Last month, two over 252,000 people were deported in Texas alone. So all of a sudden, we're starting to see the effects now. I did another one yesterday. They come tagged as possible undocumented immigrant. Furniture's there, fish tank, dead fish. They left in a hurry. If you want to see that content, I put that content on my wife's page or on my YouTube page. My wife's page is Ants and Liz. Or Ants underscore Liz or Ants Inc. on YouTube. They all go there too. I don't flood them on this page. But it looks like that's becoming different.

SPEAKER_03: 50:14

The used car market, the used furniture market, the thrift stores are gonna blow up. The used furniture market and the foreclosure market, right? Like that's a big 250,000 immigrants in the state of uh Texas have deported or been self-deported. Yeah, I predicted this, obviously. You know, these people are living somewhere, they're in a house. JD Vance keeps emphasizing this same point. If we get rid of them, this house will come on the market. And yeah, you know, and if we get enough of them on the market, prices will fly. They could even go down. Sorry, boomers. Okay.

SPEAKER_08: 50:46

I wonder how long it's a bigger.

SPEAKER_03: 50:47

The price was artificially held high by the Mexicans in the neighborhood. Sorry.

SPEAKER_08: 50:50

I wonder how long it's gonna take for that to iron out into the in the market.

SPEAKER_03: 50:55

Trump's entire presidency.

SPEAKER_08: 50:56

Okay.

SPEAKER_03: 50:57

Because it's gonna amp up 50 million, Ron. 50 million. We're at two million. 50 million. We're at two million.

SPEAKER_08: 51:04

We got a little ways to go.

SPEAKER_03: 51:05

We've got a ways to go. We got a ways to go. There's a lot of hope. Another thing that happened yesterday, or in the recent days, was RFK announced, guess what? No more mercury in vaccines. No human being should suffer from exposure to mercury. Feels obvious. No human being should have to suffer from exposure to mercury. Feels obvious. Feels like feels like that should be enough. Okay.

SPEAKER_13: 51:31

And I'm looking forward to continued progress. Article 4 of the convention calls on parties to cut mercury use by phasing out listed mercury-added products. But in 2010, as the treaty took shape, negotiators made a major exception by marisol-containing vaccines were carved out of the regulation. The same treaty that began to phase out mercury in lamps and cosmetics chose to leave it in products injected into babies, pregnant women, and the most vulnerable among us. We have to ask why. Why do we hold a double standard for mercury? Why do we call it dangerous in batteries, in over-the-counter medications and makeup, but acceptable in vaccines and deaths? Because we're idiots. Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies identify it as a potent neurotoxin, a mutagen, a carcinogen, and an endocrine disruptor. But I just hear Democrats say that all the science has been done. There is not a single study that proves it safe. That's why in July of this year, the United States closed the final chapter on the use of thimerosol as a vaccine preservative, something that should have happened.

SPEAKER_03: 52:53

So we can finally take mercury out of our batteries and our cosmetics and our vaccines. For all, you know, all those anti-vaxxers. Why were you anti-vaxx? Because I don't want to put mercury in my body. It's not dangerous. There's not been one spec, not even one study broached the topic. You just assumed it was safe and okay. The other thing RFK had involvement in with yesterday was this. Guess what? No more game of function.

SPEAKER_10: 53:23

Gain of function research is a type of biomedical research where pathogens are adulterated, viruses are adulterated to make them more potent or to change the way that they function. Many people believe that gain of function research was one of the key causes of the COVID pandemic that struck us in the last decade. What this executive order does, first of all, it provides powerful new tools to enforce the ban on federal funding for gain of function research abroad. It also strengthens other oversight mechanisms related to that issue and creates an overarching strategy to ensure that biomedical research in general is being conducted safely and in a way that ultimately protects human health more.

SPEAKER_16: 54:11

It's a big deal. Could have been that we wouldn't have had the problem we had.

SPEAKER_10: 54:14

A lot of people say that, sir.

SPEAKER_03: 54:17

A lot of people say that, sir. You know, Obama banned gain of function, and then Fauci and uh Eco Health Alliance just took it over to China. Right? They made a little carve out for themselves and took it over to China. So that's no more. The other thing uh Secretary Kennedy was involved in was this.

SPEAKER_13: 54:32

This is the fulfillment of a promise that we made in the Maha report. The Maha report, which we released two and a half months ago.

SPEAKER_03: 54:41

That's 120. Oh, this audio is horrible. Okay, so this is what he said. He said, This is the fulfillment of a promise we made in the Maha report to give them an off-ramp. Who farmers? Farmers who are dependent on chemical fertilizer inputs to give them an off-ramp where they can transition to a model that emphasizes soil health. Farmers have been prevented from doing regenerative agriculture because they're locked into these chemical, like they have contracts and regulations that you must use these chemicals if you want to sell in the store.

SPEAKER_08: 55:10

Oh yeah. And if they don't, they will get sued.

SPEAKER_03: 55:14

And this has been a huge cause of issues. And so now it's over. I feel like RFK behind the scenes has just been like kicking butt and taking me. Oh, yeah. He's killing it. I mean, I think he's I think he deserves a reward for all of what he's doing to help really save our future.

SPEAKER_21: 55:29

RFK Jr. has got to go. What? AI introduced articles of impeachment for the movie from office. RFK Jr. has turned his back on science.

SPEAKER_03: 55:38

Oh we, the scientists told us not to study Mercury, Ron! Don't question it.

SPEAKER_21: 55:44

Public help and the American people. Under his watch, families are less safe. Healthcare costs are skyrocketing. Uh not his problem. And life-saving research, including right here in Michigan, is being gutted. Oh, there's RFP Jr.

SPEAKER_03: 55:59

Michigan sounds like a grey state to be in.

SPEAKER_21: 56:01

The biggest self-created threat to our health and safety. I cannot and I will not stand by while one man dismantles decades of medical progress.

SPEAKER_03: 56:13

Just like Bill Gates said, we've been trying to kill you with these vaccines. If we can get enough vaccines, we can get the population down. What I thought it was supposed to save lives. What are you talking about? Who is this and why are we listening? A representative in Mich it a repres uh representative from Michigan to DC.

SPEAKER_21: 56:29

Enough is enough. And that is why I'm pushing to impeach RFK Jr. to hold him accountable and to protect the health and safety and future of every Michigander.

SPEAKER_06: 56:40

Okay.

SPEAKER_21: 56:41

Because our health, our science, and our future are worth fighting for.

SPEAKER_08: 56:46

Better start working out. You got to push a little harder.

SPEAKER_03: 56:50

RFK's gotta go. What do you mean, no fertilizers? What do you mean, no mercury? I just invested in a mercury factory. Washington State is being is targeting a ranching family that has been tending to their land and livestock for decades. This comes from Secretary Brooke Rollins. So they've intervened in Washington State because there's a family, the King family, who who uh runs cattle on public land. Okay. And one of the things with people who run cattle on public land is they maintain watering holes.

SPEAKER_08: 57:16

Yep.

SPEAKER_03: 57:16

Cattle watering holes are explicitly excluded from wetland considerations and critical waterways and stuff like that. And they're allowed to be maintained on federal lands.

SPEAKER_08: 57:25

Yeah, because they're needed and necessary for life.

SPEAKER_03: 57:28

Yes. The state of Washington came after this family simply because they were hand shoveling out a pond on, you know, out in this area that they've maintained for decades as a family. And Washington State brought them into lawsuits, gave them$250,000 fines. And so Brooke Rollins wrote this. It is common knowledge, especially in the West, the access to water is preeminently important in raising cattle. The creation and maintenance of stock water ponds is one of the primary ways to ranchers ensure that livestock have access to water. For over 60 years, the King Ranch has had farm ponds on the property they own and lease. These man-made structures eventually start filling back up with sediment and need to be cleaned out. However, the state is now claiming farm ponds are wetlands.

SPEAKER_08: 58:08

Nope.

SPEAKER_03: 58:09

And is attempting to bring the hammer down on the ranch simply for doing what they have always done, steward their land and livestock. Targeting a ranch, actively maintaining a man-made farm pond is the own is not only wrong, but impermissible under state and federal law. There are no laws, they're only cops. They brought the hammer down in a civil lawsuit against the own our own state and laws and federal laws. It doesn't matter what laws you have on the books if you don't have people that will follow and abide by them that are in the seats of power. There are laws that say you can't give a CDL to an illegal immigrant, but Washington gave over 700. And other states gave tens of thousands. Okay. In July, uh target uh impossible man-made farm is not only wrong but impermissible under state and federal law, and the Trump administration will not sit idly by in the face of this injustice. Targeted law fair against American agriculture producers and the weaponization of government agencies is a clear assault on those who feed, fuel, and clothe the American people. In July, the development department sent a letter to Kings clarifying that there was no evidence of any activity that would constitute a conversion of a wetland pursuant to USDA authorities. We also are aware of a third-party review of the farm ponds in question and determined they do not constitute wetland pursuant to the Clean Water Act. USDA is reviewing funding it provides to the state of Washington and any institutions within it that may be weaponized against farmers and ranchers as the Kings. Defending farmers and ranchers for the weaponization of laws is a top priority. From the weaponization of law is the top priority for this administration. When it says law, it doesn't mean the written law. It means law enforcement agents. The aforementioned governmental overreach threatens the existence of the King Ranch in Washington and would be dangerous precedent for ranch families across the state.

SPEAKER_08: 59:47

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_03: 59:49

They have to cut the funding. Just like you seize the oil boat in the middle of the Caribbean, just like you stopped the drug boats, you have to stop the funding. Cut the programs. I don't care. I live here in Washington. We've Got potholes, we'll do it for a few more years. Right? We get it. I get it. Please cut the funding to these communists. That's all I got. We're paying$2 a gallon of gas. Make it obvious. Make us pay six or seven. Right? Make it obvious that they're robbing us blind. Stop acting like Venezuela. Yes. They're robbing us blind. They're taken from every corner while at the same time not following the constitutions of the state and the federal government at all levels. From transportation to the Department of Justice to coming after ranchers that are just trying to feed the cattle that, you know, we put on our tables.

SPEAKER_06: 1:00:38

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 1:00:40

It has to stop. And other good news, the Supreme Court struck down the ruling that forced parents to vaccinate children without exception. So in uh New York, the Amish people that live in New York brought suit because they they got rid of the religious exemptions for vaccination of kids. They brought suit and the Supreme Court was like, haha, can't do that. You cannot force anybody to take a vaccine. Can't make it a condition on public benefit, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. That's excellent. It's gonna be harder and harder for them to do that again. Now, Washington State was basically made it so the state's like, yeah, I mean, the next pandemic, you guys are all just gonna go right into the camps. I've got to leave your house. I'm going to these camps. We've got out the middle of the desert. Like, of course we're gonna do that. Hopefully the funding gets cut and we can get some new people in there and change that. I heard another thing yesterday that Act Blue is uh raised like a gajillion dollars. And I'm like, is Act Blue still in operation? I don't understand. They were smurfing, they were under investigation in like nine states and by the feds. Why are they raising all this money? Give guys like this, James Carville, a little bit of too much confidence. Understand it.

SPEAKER_15: 1:01:42

People are seeing this, and people are voting on this. Understand that. He's not getting away with it. He's caught on to. He's not getting away with it. He's paying for it, and he's gonna continue to pay for it. And we gotta stop looking at him as some kind of political symbolia or political dignity or anything like that. He's done. We just got to butter this toast and slice it immediately. He's done. He's done in Florida, it's done in Pennsylvania, it's done in New Jersey, it was done in Virginia, it was done everywhere in Mississippi, it was done in Georgia, he's done. It's over. You're a loser, dude. You're losing everywhere, and you're gonna lose more because you, my friend, are a loser.

SPEAKER_03: 1:02:32

I think there's something in James Carville's past that's I don't I don't know why I would think that, but you got a lot of entry all for he's got some baggage. Yeah, he's got some package. That's something he's a little afraid of, you know what I'm saying? Like, that's the whole extreme. He's like, you know, it's extreme there. Now, you know, on the polar opposite, the richest man in the world actually kind of admires Trump because he's funny.

SPEAKER_21: 1:02:54

He's the funniest person you know in my life.

SPEAKER_07: 1:02:57

President Trump is very funny.

SPEAKER_19: 1:03:01

President Trump is very funny.

SPEAKER_07: 1:03:03

Very funny. It's like naturally funny. Uh it's somewhat effort effortless. I mean, um, when we just had Edmundani in the office, and uh the ask her if I still thought the president was fascist. And the president said just say yes, it's easier that way. Yeah. Don't worry about it. Just say yes.

SPEAKER_03: 1:03:37

That's it for us today, you guys. Donald Trump is hilarious. Yeah, I'm a fascist. So we're on to you. Yeah, I'm a fascist. I'm gonna clean this place up. We're going to law and order. Sorry, guys. You've been in charge way too long. All right, guys, that's it for us today. We gotta jump out early. No private private side today. Thank you so much for joining us. We'll talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.

SPEAKER_14: 1:04:22

What the mic lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you don't subject to it. They automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh, king, eh? Very nice. How'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Is there ever gonna be any progress? How'd you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons! Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king.

SPEAKER_19: 1:05:14

No, we have a king! I thought we were an autonomous collective!

SPEAKER_14: 1:05:17

You're fooling yourself! We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes. How there you go! Winning classes with a game! That's what it's all about. Only people, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you! We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_24: 1:05:44

Yes.

SPEAKER_14: 1:05:44

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quiet or by a two-thirds majority in the case of quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order! I'm your king! You don't vote for kings? The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I ask was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bitch had locked a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up, will you? Shut up! Now we see the violence inherited in the system! Shut up! Have we seen a violence inheriting the system? Help, help! I'm being repressed! Bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that? That's what I'm on about.

SPEAKER_05: 1:07:05

Do you see it repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?