Why Real World Asset Tokens Could Replace Wall Street

Wall Street says the game is “fair” right up until the little guy tries to play it. We come back from a Vegas conference convinced something big is forming: regulated tokenization that ties blockchain tokens to real world assets with audits, disclosures, and transparent ledgers. If that shift holds, it’s not just another crypto trend. It’s a direct challenge to insider-friendly IPOs, settlement tricks, and the quiet ways the system skims value from everyday investors.

Then we zoom out to the bigger collision: the world of bits versus the world of atoms. AI and large language models are devouring the playbook economy, which means the safest career path is no longer “follow the manual.” We talk about why builders matter again, why data centers are creating insane demand for electricians and trades, and why the next decade could reward people who can actually make things in the physical world.

From there, we take the same “peasants perspective” to politics: RFK Jr’s surprising read on Trump, the Iran situation, and the hard-earned warning we agree with most: don’t nation-build. We also connect the dots on corruption and accountability, including claims about USAID soft power, media pipelines, court immunity, election integrity concerns, and the hypocrisy of sudden “anti-king” outrage after years of COVID-era overreach.

If you’re trying to think clearly in a noisy economy, this is for you. Subscribe, share this with a friend who feels the squeeze, and leave us a review with one question you want answered next.

Transcript

We’re Getting Screwed Opening

SPEAKER_10 0:24

We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be true podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. I apologize for having nothing for you yesterday. I didn't realize when our flights were because I'm the guy that's just like book it and let's go. And we were flying back basically during the show. So I was getting text messages and telegram from the chat from the uh living room. And I'm getting all these messages. Are you doing a show today? I'm like, ah, sorry. So, anyways, glad to have you guys back. Ferrazier working the dream. Good morning from Boise. Or are you gonna adjust my sound?

SPEAKER_17 1:31

I am yeah, all right.

Tokenized Assets Meet Regulation

SPEAKER_10 1:33

Oh, I can't see the chats. Oh, you can do that. Just slide it over so I can see it. Good morning, Ferrazier Working the Dream from Boise. Pony Boy, good morning, glad to have y'all back. Miss y'all peasants. Yeah, I missed you guys too. I hope you enjoyed the replay of interview with Doug. That was fun. It's always hard, you know. You take a day off, you build all this momentum, and uh then it's like, you know, are we coming back or not? So, anyways, glad you guys are here. Super fun. And a lot of stuff happened since Thursday when we last spoke, and there's no way to cover it all unless we want to do like a six-hour marathon show. It's just not probably worth it. So, we're just gonna go over some of the highlights, um, some of the highlights and kind of important themes, and we'll get back into the daily news cycle as we get going. Pray the rosary daily. So glad to have you back. Uh, so update on where I went. I went down to Las Vegas to a conf uh conference. It was a trusted smart chain conference. It was really amazing. I will have a lot more to share with that in the coming future. But here's what I can say. I've been a I've been an advocate of Bitcoin for a long time. And I've kind of described there's Bitcoin and there's everything else. Right? Bitcoin qualifies as money, whereas everything else qualifies as a currency, kind of at best, right? A lot of them are meme coins, and it's just based on what do you have here? Ethereum has utility. Ethereum allows for smart contracts and things like that, but there's no connection between the digital and the real. Does that make sense? So it's all just kind of our usage of it, but that's never an enforceable real thing. That's changing, and that's changing with trusted smart chain who's been working with the White House, the House, the Senate, the SEC, and different groups, um, different regulating groups, and the connection, the tie-in. This is what we've we've listened to Larry Frink and others talk about tokenization of things. Essentially, the New York Stock Exchange, the Dow, the NASDAQ, and these different exchanges where you, as the little guy, can go buy a stock, some ownership in these big companies, which then they take that capital to operate and make profits and pay you a dividend. Well, there's now going to be the official regulatory tie-in of tokenized coins with real-world assets that are tier one SEC approved, which means they go through annual audits that then are put on the token exchange, and it's like a new New York stock exchange kind of this is gonna be a huge it is huge. So it takes it from memes and dogecoins and kitty cat meme coins and all that, and it takes it into very tangible, very real, fractionalized ownership through the tokenized assets. There's 16 trillion assets coming online in the next four years. BlackRock's working on this, and I went to the conference of the group that seems to be the farthest ahead in this process, and they have their first real world assets coming online this week. So it was really cool to see that. And it was cool to see the panel of all the handful of companies of the ones they've got lined up that were talking about why they're doing this over going IPO with going, you know, going on the New York Stock Exchange, and it all has to do with the same stuff we complain about every day corruption. You know, you go IPO and you can only deal with accredited investors, and it's insider deals and insider deals. And that's why when most IPOs go public, the guys that got all the sweetheart deals, they sell off on day one, and then the IPO drops value, and then you you, as an early investor, have to kind of ride it out, right? Right, and you got to ride this weird bubble wave, you gotta ride this weird bubble that just popped the day the thing went public, right? Because they'd already raised their capital, and now it's the people that gave them money that are selling off, and most IPOs drop in value right out of the gate.

SPEAKER_17 5:18

Because they're all eating out of the cream off the top.

SPEAKER_10 5:21

Exactly. So it was really interesting. What the smart contracts and the tokenizations do is they basically eliminate all the reasons why I've never invested in stocks, right? Because of the corruption, the insider trading, the settlement schemes. The Bitcoin ledgers and the uh blockchain ledgers are permanent, they're transparent. It basically eliminates insider trading, it eliminates settlement, it eliminates, you know, uh stock you telling a stockbroker, sell my stock, and then they go tell their friends, hey, short the stock. This guy's about to sell. You know what I mean? Like it changes all of that. So it's very, very cool. I'll have a lot more to say about it. It was awesome. And it's something that all everybody can get in on. You know, it's it's one of those things. It's like, listen, if it was 2009, 2010, and I was telling you about buying a Bitcoin mining computer and running this algorithm, and look, you can make 10 Bitcoin a day, and you'd be like, What are you gonna do with them? Now you'd be like, Can I get 10 Bitcoin a day? Yeah, good luck, right? Because the way the the coins are mined is there's an accumulation phase where you're generating all the coins and then it's halves and halves and halves, and then it becomes the universe of coins rather than the creation of coins that's the focus. And so, right now, with this particular company, with all the companies they've got coming online, it's the accumulation phase. It's easy to get coins right now, and so now's when you want to gather up the coins because as these companies go public, they have to buy the coins from you to then sell to the shareholders. Anyways, enough of that. So it was very fun. So I was glad to do it, and better than that, I got to go on a nice long weekend date with my wife to uh Las Vegas. So we stayed at the Excalibur Hotel. Have you ever heard of the Excalibur? Uh no, it's a castle. Oh, it's a castle.

SPEAKER_17 7:06

Uh it's you know, I've been to Vegas a couple of times, but I'm not a junkie. I don't care about it.

Bits Versus Atoms Reality Check

SPEAKER_10 7:11

It's a castle on the strip, and we went to the tournament of kings, which we did jousting and like like informative sword fighting and stuff, and we sat and we we cheered like maniacs in the middle of the ages, and we have a plate with a half of a Cornish game hymn and some baked potatoes and some corn, no silverware. It was really fun. Anyways, fun experience. It was nice to go down there. That was my first time really being around the strip, so that was fun. Okay, so Peter Teal, a little while back, and keeping with our theme of times is changing, he talks uh in this clip, he talks about how um Silicon Valley has been kind of where all the entrepreneurs and and real creative thinkers have been in a long time, and they live in the world of bits, and then there's the world of atoms, right? The world of atoms, the real tangible things, the builders, real estate, et cetera, et cetera. But there's been so much regulation in the world of atoms, right? Between building regulations and all these different industries that he's gonna talk about. But the world of bits has had tons of exploring and creativity and all these amazing computer science things to the point that we've created these large language models and AI. And now what's gonna happen is the world of atoms is about to be dramatically changed. So uh again, keeping with the theme of we the peasants, we want to be in front of this stuff, right? It's not necessarily that we're the entrepreneurial tip of all of this, but you could either be on the front end and benefit from changes in in world orders, or you can be like peasants and plebes and serfs of old and just get left behind all the time.

SPEAKER_07 8:48

I've been I've been a critic of Twitter, for example, where on my uh on our website we've said, you know, they promised us flying cars and all we got was 140 characters. Um but uh you know that it's it's not a critique of Twitter as a company. It's a perfectly good company. The you know the people who work there have well-paying jobs. Um it's a perfectly great company. It's just not enough to um improve living standards for 300 million plus Americans.

SPEAKER_10 9:16

Well, while we're on the topic, I want to get back to Trump for a second, but uh, how do you think that that disconnect in some ways uh shapes the companies and the products that are created there?

SPEAKER_07 9:26

It's um you know that's this gets very this gets very speculative, but I would say that uh I would one one way of I've often described the dichotomy is that Silicon Valley feels in the world of bits. Most of the economy is the world of atoms. So the world of bits is computers, internet, mobile internet, software, that ensemble. And there's been a narrow cone of progress around those kinds of industries, but then uh you often have less good of an understanding for um the uh the sort of industries that involve in atoms that involve building uh real estate, which Trump is in, is sort of maybe the stereotypical industry involving atoms. Those are ones that are often much more heavily regulated than the world of bits. And so if you're in the world of atoms, you might be very concerned about government regulation. If you're in the world of bits, which is much less regulated, uh you might be much less concerned about government regulation. So there is this this this big separation just in terms of what they do. I wouldn't blame that on just a blind spot Silicon Valley has. I think that's a little bit too easy. Perhaps Silicon Valley has focused on the world of bits because um it's actually gotten very hard to do things in the world of atoms. And when I was an undergraduate at Stanford, um, you know, there's still a lot of different engineering fields you could study in the 1980s. They were all bad decisions. It was a bad idea to become an aeroastro engineer. It was a bad idea to become a chemical engineer or a mechanical engineer. These were all uh industries that were sort of in structural decline because they were getting outlawed, they were getting regulated to death. Nuclear engineering. I mean, your parents would have, you know, it would have been irresponsible to let you study that as a field in the 1980s. Um, even electrical engineering, which was semiconductors, and that's sort of on the boundary between atoms and bits. That was a good field for about a decade, not so much anymore. Um, computer science, not even an engineering field. That was the only sort of scientific technical field that actually had a future in the 1980s. I've been a good thing.

SPEAKER_10 11:22

What do you think about that, Ron? Because you're in the engineering world.

SPEAKER_17 11:25

Well, I would I do have something I do have something to say. So what I was gonna say is that's that Mr. Peter Thiel is taking advantage of hindsight here really well. And you know, back in the 1980s, nuclear engineering was the future. And you know, making a decision whether or not to go into nuclear engineering in those days would have been, I think, uh looked at differently. Um you know, that was high-tech stuff in those days, so it would have been the future. And now he's saying the future has changed and you would be dumb to look at the future back then. I I think that's not the right way to look at it.

SPEAKER_10 12:03

I actually disagree with him. When was the last time you designed anything? When was the last time you actually engineered anything?

SPEAKER_17 12:10

Um, you disagree with him?

SPEAKER_10 12:11

It sounds like you're I I agree with him, but I disagree, I think, with you. Oh, when was the last time you, as an engineer, a civil engineer, engineered a new bridge or a new way to do a road, or a new drainage system, or could create anything. You've been completely in the prescriptive box of this is what works, this is what the county will approve. Yes. Does that make sense? You spend all of your time playing to the regulators, not engineering as a thinker.

SPEAKER_17 12:39

I don't disagree with you, and I don't disagree with Peter on that point. That's not the point I'm trying to make.

SPEAKER_10 12:44

So, like nuclear, same thing. You're not inventing or new things we can do with nuclear. Sure. Nuclear engineering is simply a nuclear technician. You just need to know how the plant runs so you can monitor the gauges that we invented back in the 1950s and 40s. Okay. Yeah. There's no, there's no cutting-edge anything nuclear right now. You play around with nuclear and the black helicopters show up around your mouth and like, shut it down. You know, you're about to develop a warp core, you're out.

SPEAKER_17 13:12

I think that there's a lot of physics around nuclear engineering that we still don't understand, and I think it's still a viable field for people to go into.

SPEAKER_10 13:19

Well, that's why Weinstein Eric Weinstein says, Why have we not advanced one math equation in physics for 80 years?

SPEAKER_17 13:27

I will tell you, it is because we have not been looking.

SPEAKER_10 13:30

And because of the National Security Act, which says you can't look. Uh-huh. That's what he says. It's not that there aren't bright minds, it's not that we couldn't have flying cars. It's the government and said came in and said you won't have flying cars. Yes. That's why. I agree with that too. I think that's I think that's what he's the point he's making. So all the minds that are creative steered into programming because they could explore and create literal meta-universes inside of your Oculus. Sure. As far as what we have in the world, we haven't advanced hardly anything.

SPEAKER_17 14:06

Sure. But what I'm trying to say is in the 80s, the world of bits that he is touting as the great thing didn't even fucking exist. I'm sorry. Oops. But, you know, and so how can you say that in the 80s it was a stupid decision to go into an engineering field when that was the pinnacle of what we had to go into? I mean, we didn't, you couldn't. I mean, in the 80s, what were you gonna do in the computer engineering field? I mean, this is back in the day when Bill Gates was quoted as saying 32k ought to be enough for anybody.

SPEAKER_10 14:41

Well, you know, it's interesting you say that because my dad had a career path to pick and he joined the military and it he was National Guard out of high school, right? And when he re-enlisted, he re-enlisted in the Air Force specifically to go into the computer industry. Because that was that was the that was the where the cutting edge of computer stuff was. Yeah, and he's been in the computer industry the whole time because of that very thing. It was it was where the opportunity was because guys like Bill Gates were saying 32k, what do you need more than that? Listen, why do you need to drive faster than 65 miles an hour? What do you need different?

SPEAKER_17 15:15

You know what I mean? But in those days, it was still the infancy, it wasn't really known, you know, where this was going. You know, when computers first came out, they were a toy.

AI Rewards Rule Breakers

SPEAKER_10 15:25

Yeah. With some people saw the future in it, you know what I mean? So Palantir CEO Alex Carp, he said this, and we're gonna play this little clip, and then I'm gonna read the longer transcript of it.

SPEAKER_12 15:36

You're self-made, but you're not self-made in an economic sense. You're self-made in maybe a morals and values sense. So how did you become Alex Carp?

SPEAKER_13 15:47

Well, I mean, you know, there's the there's all these variables, very smart parents, highly educated, crappy school, which I never would have done. Like, you know, it's like, and so you learn like the world is violent. Um uh dyslexia, meaning I there's no playbook I could possibly follow. I think some of the reasons why dyslexics are so outperformant now is that we're in a non-playbook world and the playbook's not that valuable. But if you're dyslexic, you can't follow the playbook, or only in a third-rate way. So you in you invent new and generative things.

Skilled Trades Power The AI Boom

SPEAKER_10 16:21

So that's kind of the start of this conversation, and I'll read how the rest of it goes. Palantir C OCARP just named who wins the AI era? Not the people who mastered the system, the people who could never follow it. Carp, we're in a non-playbook world and the playbook's not that valuable. For decades, the global economy ran on compliance. Read the manual, follow the procedure, execute like the person next to you. AI just automated the manual. Your entire value was executing the playbook. You are now losing to something that does it perfectly, instantly, and for free. Carp, if you're dyslexic, you can't follow the playbook. You invent new and generative things. Neurodivergent people spend their entire lives inside a system built for a brain they do not have. The front door was locked, so they found other doors, built new ones, attacked problems from angles nobody else tried because the standard path was never theirs. This is not a disadvantage. That is for decades of forced preparation for the exact world we just entered. The front door is now locked for everyone. The people who spent their lives perfecting the rules are scrambling. The people who spent their lives ignoring them already know how to move. The system spent a century punishing the exact people it needed most. It measured compliance and called it intelligence. It filtered out the builders, the ones who could not sit still, and the ones that could not memorize a curriculum designed for someone else's mind and called them broken. They were not broken, they were just early. So I really like that. Uh obviously, you know, in my mind this weekend going to that conference, I'm like, yeah, this is, you know, I mean, there's still a lot of guys going out there going, I want to be a stockbroker. Look, my cousin's a stockbroker and he makes all that money. That industry is going to go away because it's a hall of smoke and mirrors, and AI doesn't like smoke and mirrors, right? Like I think about that. I was thinking about that with engineering. And, you know, every now and then I'll be like, hey, Ron, have you seen this engineering program where you just like, you know, on a napkin, draw in the square, like the how you want your house to design, upload it to AI. And it's like, here's your architecture with your engineering and whatever. Go find an engineer to stamp it. But all the thinking's been done, right? Because it's all in the playbook. Well, now that the playbook is like free and automated, people are gonna have to figure out how to create something with it and actually do things, right? So this is this is uh Mike Rowe. He was on Fox Business talking about electricians, right? Because now what's happening is that the world of bits is now needing to incorporate the atoms, right? It's not just personal computing, and and lots of people saw this, right? The Mike Dells of the world were like, yeah, personal computers is gonna be a thing, you know what I mean? And create and and created computers made of atoms to put the bits in your front room and on your TV and in your workspace and stuff like that.

SPEAKER_17 18:58

Yeah, it's a great value add.

SPEAKER_10 19:00

Well, now the AI is the same thing. You talk, listen to Elon Musk. He's like, in the future, you're not gonna have a phone with a bunch of apps. Your phone is just gonna be an AI interface. You're gonna tell it what it what you want or need, and it's gonna go out and do it for you. It's not going to be something that you control every little app and thing like that.

SPEAKER_17 19:17

Right. It'll be similar to when you know we first came out with just like full-blown laptops that were like, you know, hungry engines and blah, blah, blah. And then pretty soon all you needed was a Chromebook with a browser. You know, this is just gonna be the next iteration where all you need is just the input-output device.

SPEAKER_10 19:32

So where does the thinking get done? Well, it gets done in data centers. Ah, well, who's gonna build the data centers?

SPEAKER_00 19:37

Mike Rowe joins me now. He's the dirty jobs guy. Right, Mike, you've met with data center electricians in Texas. Uh they're under 30 and they're making$200,000 a year. They don't have any college debt. Why do you think that some schools dismiss skilled trades as kind of a consolation prize? Why do they do that?

SPEAKER_26 19:58

Two things. Uh, the electricians that I met most recently at a data center in Plano were making$260,000 a year. It's true they had no debt, but the most consequential component of that meeting was the fact that all three of them had been poached three times in the prior 18 months. That's what's going on in certain parts of the country in the electric game right now. It's like the draft in the major leagues. Um, for the second part of your question, I'll tell you this. 16 years ago, this month, I was in D.C., I testified before both houses of Congress about the need for some kind of national effort to reinvigorate the trades. That was the first time I said those words out loud, along with the phrase we have to stop categorizing an entire chunk of our workforce as people who have won some vocational consolation prize. Because that's what we did. When we put our thumb on the scale for one form of education, right? A university four-year degree, when we said that that was the best path for the most people, we implicitly suggested that anyone with the temerity to embark upon a different path was indeed the proud owner of something second class. That's when the wheels started to come off the bus. I can't believe it's been 16 years, but the chickens have come home to roost for sure.

SPEAKER_10 21:33

260 grand for basically an entry-level electrician. That's pretty good.

SPEAKER_17 21:37

I'm thinking about switching careers right now.

SPEAKER_10 21:40

It's just a four year apprenticeship. Let's roll. But the thing is, it's the merger of the worlds, right? It's the bits need the atoms. And now the bits have gotten to a point with the large language models and AI, it can design things that are going to be ready to build. So the RD phase, the thinking phase, the stuff that's in the in that box, it's It's done. So now it's like, let's get our flying cars. Well, what about the engineering? Well, trial and error you can do in a computer model and let's go straight to the prototype and mass production. You know, when when Elon Musk talks about these big dreadnought factories where basically it's just this giant 3D printing thing, you can just tell it what you want. It can kick out different products coming out the end of that thing as you go. It's pretty phenomenal. So, future, the world is changing. Let's not get left behind. We're peasants. I don't want to stay peasants forever. We're always going to be peasants.

SPEAKER_17 22:34

You young ones out there, when you're thinking about your future careers, what you need to keep in mind is that you always need to remember how you're going to add value. And that is your selling piece.

SPEAKER_10 22:45

You know, for people who've known me for a long time, I've talked about wanting to do what's real. Right. Because I'm, you know, I can talk clearly, I can be compelling, I can I could be good at sales. But my life and my soul wanted things of integrity, right? Which really kind of led me into the trades and ultimately into Septic, who's like, listen, if I can make your toilet flush, is that worth a buck? You know what I mean? Like there's a fair exchange of value kind of thing going on there. And so it's really nice for me to see because the computer industry, you know, God bless my father, who probably would have loved to see his kids go into the computer trades. None of us did, right? And so, but this is this is where I see the merger now. It's like, okay, the computers have advanced to the point that they're a great tool and they're gonna come into the world of the atoms, you know, everything's gonna be automated. I remember a father-in-law once told me, Oh, it'll be a long time before robots replace you on the excavator. And I'm like, not now, not now, you know what I mean? Like, like when I started seeing the GPS units that go on to excavators, not just bulldozers and road graders. I was like, Oh, it's just a matter of time before you just set in the program and set the excavator loose.

SPEAKER_17 23:52

Yeah, I mean, and well, it's already like that on some job sites, and those automated machineries, you know, the guy in the cab, he's just there as the backup. He's the break.

SPEAKER_10 24:03

Yeah, that's all he is. He's the break for if the lidar sensors fail or something like that.

SPEAKER_17 24:09

Yeah, he just making sure that the job site doesn't get viral videos.

RFK On Trump And Power

SPEAKER_10 24:14

That's all he's there. He's there's the break. So uh down at CPAC this week, which this is kind of sad. CPAC had really low attendance, oh, which it's really sad, but it has to do with this Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Joe K, you know, all these ops that are going on, kind of pulling away from and and splitting up the uh conservative base into kind of different groups. So it was kind of sad for me to see that and kind of how the crowd was diluted, and some of the speakers took plot shots, it's whatever, you know. But RFK Jr. was on stage and he had some really interesting things to say. So let's listen to we're gonna listen to two of his clips today. This is the first one, both kind of about Trump.

SPEAKER_22 24:56

Well, let me just say this Brendan Trump is exactly the opposite of everything that I believed him to be. Um, and you know, I met, I you know, I basically drank the Kool-Aid that he was his, you know, bombastic narcissist that didn't read books, was ill-informed. And um, and then, you know, now I know exactly the opposite. He's the opposite of a narcissist and empath. You will see that every time he talks about the Ukraine war, he talks about the casualties on both sides. You will not hear any Democrat ever talk about that. And he talks about the Russian kids who are dying. He gets the reports every week, and he they make a huge impression on him about the death rates. A thousand kids a day are dying over there. My son fought in Ukraine, and he's the only member of his military unit who survived. And he understands that these are people's children, and he talks about that, and then also he he has uh, yeah.

SPEAKER_10 26:10

So Trump, Trump, I thought that was the first time I've ever heard Trump described as an empath, right? It is, we get this view that he's a narcissist and all that stuff. And my dad has said this before, these words have come out of his mouth. Well, I don't like the things Trump says, I don't like his mannerisms. You might not like them.

SPEAKER_17 26:26

I've heard that from other people, too.

Rumble Wallet And Creator Payments

SPEAKER_10 26:28

Yeah, I've heard that from other people. But one of the things Trump said last week, and I think we played the clip, was he talks about, you know, with 94% negative news coverage, someone's gotta talk good about me and my policies, you know? So even if I say it and it ticks you off, at least you heard it and can process the message behind it. And so I thought that was really interesting. One of the other things that uh Bill O'Reilly said this week in an interview, which we don't need to play the clip, but he said Trump wakes up every morning and goes, How can he just piss off the girls at the view? And he'll say things just to get them just riled up because it exposes them as the narcissists, it exposes them as the control freaks, the anti-free speech, the censorship crowd. You know what I mean? So what do we got? We got Rumble Wallet? Excellent.

SPEAKER_17 27:08

Let's well, yeah, I figured it was good to bring in a crypto related thing. Here's a little inside scoop that many creators are talking about behind the scenes. It's actually one of the reasons I'm using Rumble. They made a way for super chat creators to get paid immediately and without any fees. YouTube and Twitch take up to 50% fees when you tip creators. This method takes none. That's right. The platform takes zero fees. It's nearly 100% of what you send me. You can super chat with Bitcoin, TetherUSD, or even Tether Gold stable coins. The tip will show up directly on a Rumble chat, which I'll do my best to read. All you need to do is download the Rumble wallet on the app store and send the tips to your favorite creators. You can go to wallet.rumble.com or you can download the app directly from the app stores. Seriously, what an amazing way to get rid of the middleman and help the creator economy. Shout out to Rumble for making this disruptive technology.

SPEAKER_10 27:55

Woohoo! Absolutely. Yeah, I'm, you know, I've I've been a critic of crypto, still am a critic of crypto when it comes to the Bitcoin, the uh meme coins and the as they call them, the shit coins, right? I'm a critic. I think it's a crypt, but it doesn't mean that the blockchain technology is a bad thing, it's a ledger. That's all it is. It's a slow database, you know what I mean? But it it creates the transparency we need to actually hold our government accountable. So in that regard, I think it's a great tool. Okay, so Roger Stone also had this to say about Donald Trump, and I'm setting this up for a reason. Okay, I'm setting this up for a reason. We're just not out here being sick offense for Trump and stuff like that. Although we do love the man. You see, I changed my hat to the make crypto great again hat. That's an honor of the. I'm gonna keep this in the office. So when we read the uh Rumble wallet, I'll do the next section with the make crypto grade again. Okay, so this is Roger Stone talking about Trump. Nobody pushes that man around.

SPEAKER_23 28:48

The most intimidating person I actually I work with has to be Trump. Really? Yeah, because he is uh he's not managed, he's not handled, he's not scripted. He he just does whatever he wants to do. And uh most politicians are testing the win. In other words, they're looking at polls, they're looking at focus groups, they're they're consulting their advisors. Trump is is just he knows what he wants to do from the beginning. And uh don't want to be late for a meeting with him. Oh man, he's he's very intimidating.

Iran Conflict Without Nation Building

SPEAKER_10 29:24

I like that. I like that. You know, Roger Stone is also one of these divisive characters. Lots of people either love him or hate him. But I remember after January 6th, he was in a car, screw Trump, I'm done with Trump, blah, blah, blah. And now he's like, I'm Trump's biggest fan. Yeah, you got your pardon, you got your connotation, you know. But uh, I always think it's funny when he criticizes other people who are critical of Trump. And it's like, well, you were one of the same, you guys are all in the same boat, man. Like there's very few of us that were like legit ride or die. I know I was, Doug Wyatt was, but we suffered in the gulags. The guys that were out there, they were waving in the wind with popular opinion, you know what I mean? So here's another one of RFK Jr. talking about Trump and specifically talking about the Middle East. Now, you contrast this with, say, for example, back in uh was it 2016 when Larry Johnson was running for office. He was the libertarian candidate, former governor of New Mexico, and he was asked about Aleppo. Aleppo, you know, the place that Barack Obama was bombing that was being completely collapsed, it was in the middle of Syria, this probe civil war. And we're live on TV, he goes, What's Aleppo? What's Aleppo, right? Contrast that with this Donald Trump.

SPEAKER_22 30:35

He he has uh encyclopedic molecular knowledge on these this wide range of very, very eclectic interest, music, Broadway shows, pro wrestling, football, every sport, um, golf, and and then you know, and business in Wall Street. He knows how everybody made their money and what deals they made. And he tells stories all the time about it, it's just one after the other. And one time I was during the campaign, I was on the airplane with him, and we were sitting across the table from each other eating McDonald's, drinking Diet Coke. And um he we started talking about Syria, and he got a uh a place mat and he turned it on his back, and then he took a sharpie and he drew a perfect map of the MIDI's, and then he put the troop strength of every country on every border on that map, and it just uh it challenged a lot of the assumptions that I had been told about. I mean, he has uh, you know, he has this extraordinary depth of knowledge about what's happening in each one of the agencies, my agency and the others, and uh, you know, and then he has an instinct for making good choices.

SPEAKER_12 32:05

Well, I have to say that and I I would say this.

SPEAKER_22 32:12

I think, you know, I think my uncle uh John Kennedy understood the use of power uh better than any president who's preceded him. I think Donald Trump understands the use of power better than probably any president that we've had, at least since Roosevelt, and and maybe in American history.

SPEAKER_10 32:34

He understands the use of power, right? So not only does he have an encyclopedic molecular knowledge of all kinds of different topics, he's very high IQ, as they say, a stable genius, right? But then he also understands the use of power, which is why he uses True Social or Twitter back in the day as a bludgeon sometimes, right? And he he was willing to say, hey, come to D DC on January 6th, it'll be wild, right? Because he understood power. He's a threat to the people who are brokers of power, the people that wield none of it, but yet accumulate it, right? The political parties. He, as a singular person, has that incredible ability. So let's talk about Iran, right? So Trump has an intimate knowledge of the Middle East, he understands what's going on there. In his first term, they created the Abraham Accords. This was this this set the stage for peace and cooperation in the Middle East. For the first time ever, you allowed uh Saudi Arabia, allowed Israeli planes to fly over their airspace, and and they could have trade. And you know, it was like a huge, huge open door to peace in the Middle East, the Abraham Accords. But what was the sword thumb in the whole thing? It was Iran fomenting Hamas, Hezbollah, Wahhabiism, other jihad sects, anybody that was willing to raise the sword to the West or her allies, Iran was funding. And then simultaneously, it was acting as an off-off books balance sheet for the British bankers in order to create the settlements. All the stuff we were talking about at the beginning, the corruption of Wall Street and stuff. Iran was a central node in that, right? And so Trump posted this this morning. He said the United States of America is in a serious discussion with a new and more reasonable regime. So over what's happened is apparently there have been people that have come forward that said we'll negotiate. They've let over 20 ships through the Strait of Hormuz, so things are breaking loose. They're basically running out of missiles and places to launch them from. So apparently, Israel, good sources saying life is returning to normal there, because they've been under a barrage. So, you know, we've been focused on Iran, Iran, Iran. Well, Israel's been on lockdown itself because they've had missiles landing in their cities. Well, that's tapered off to where people are returning to kind of normal life. So that's really good. So he says, uh, a new and more reasonable regime to end our military operation in Iran. Great progress has been made. But if for any reason a deal is not shortly reached, which it probably will be, and if the Hormuz Strait is not immediately open for business, we will conclude. So he's saying we're done. We'll conclude our lovely stay in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating all of their electric generating plants, oil wells, and Crag Island, and possibly all desalination plants, which we have purposely not yet touched. This will be in retribution for our many soldiers and others that Iran has butchered and killed over the regime's 47-year reign of terror. Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump. Now, we read that and we're like, power, water, but what he's basically saying, it's it's to the Iranian people too. You've got to take back your country. The consequences are gonna be dire because you're a cog in this, right? Your consent, your acquiescence has caused that. Now, the Iranian regime, apparently, after this spring, when they killed 30,000, 38,000-ish of their own people, everybody was touched by that. And there's no legitimacy internationally, there's no legitimacy internally. So the pressure is on for them to change course. Otherwise, you know, you take out those facilities, like he mentions there, there's 90 million people in Iran. Uh the famine, the catastrophe is stunning what could happen there. So I would say that's a pretty good motivator. Not that Iran has always been a rational actor. On Fox News, uh uh Johnny uh what's his name? Joey John. Um Joey Jones. Sometimes I know these guys' name.

SPEAKER_17 36:38

I don't know who you're looking at.

SPEAKER_10 36:41

Oh let's see here. His name's Joey Jones. Joey Joe.

SPEAKER_17 36:46

Johnny Joey Jones.

SPEAKER_10 36:48

I'm very torn on this. So Joey Jones is a military veteran and he's missing his legs. Oh, right. So if you ever see him on the couch, you see his prosthetic legs. So he's he's a war veteran, served alongside. I don't think he served alongside Pete Hexeth, but sat alongside Pete Hexeth. And he had this to say to Donald Trump about the Iran conflict. And I think this is where a lot of people sit. A lot of people that are anti-war, at the same time, we're not opposed to taking action. It's just this endless nation-building exercise that we go on that cost guys like him his legs, that costs guys like Joe Kent their wives, that cost me my friends. You know what I mean? It's it's it's like it's not that we're opposed to big, beautiful military and using it. It's that we're opposed to this nation-building exercise that follows it. So he gives a good piece of advice to Donald Trump. And then I'm gonna show you, you know, not necessarily Donald Trump's reaction, but I think what the game plan is.

SPEAKER_05 37:40

I'm gonna say this. Uh, I'm very torn on this completely. I'm personally torn on this because I sat beside Pete Haggseth for years on a couch on Fox and Friends when they needed me. Yeah. I've had a lot of conversations with him before he was confirmed as a Secretary of War. I know what's in his heart and I know what's in what's in his experience. I've also watched President Trump for more than a decade now be a president who said no new wars, no forever wars, and back that up. Killing Solomon with a missile, taking out Maduro, uh Midnight Hammer, the track record is there, ending ISIS in weeks. All right, so the track record is there, and I don't think he's changed. I don't think he's owned by Benjamin Netanyahu. I think there are complexities to this that you're gonna get criticized over. But I'm gonna say this President Trump, Pete Heggseth, uh General Kane, the rest of the generals, if you send our men and women into that country to kill our bad guys, to take, to spill their blood because they deserve it. I don't even have to agree with you on it. Just please do this. Don't nation build, don't win hearts and minds, don't spread democracy. Spill the blood of the evil people that deserve to die without our hands tied and without a PR campaign and get the hell out of there. That's all we have tolerance for. It's all I that's all that will work. We won every battle in Iraq and Afghanistan. We've lost the war because our politicians don't have a spine. Don't be those people. All right, still ahead. We'll go back.

SPEAKER_10 39:04

Yeah, okay, that's it. That's it. Right there. Spill the blood of the evil people. There's there's nothing that you're going to say about the Iranian regime or the legitimacy of power, or they are sovereign country, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. You chop the head off kids, you rape women, you allow child brides, blah, blah, blah. You go on and on. Nope. Sorry. You have no legitimacy, you have no reason to rule. You're only ruling because you have the guns. So the guys with the bigger guns got to come in and take care of the problem, right? It's pretty simple. It's like if your neighborhood's run by gangs, the only solution is the bigger gang called the police or the sheriff's department. You know what I'm saying? So I think that's really great. And Trump put this out this morning, too. Okay. So, as peasants, let's put on our thinking caps. Read, read, we're gonna read this, and this is exactly, I think, the game plan here. The United States has become energy independent. We become a dealer of energy. You can buy energy from us. Iran is a problem for worldwide peace. They foment terror, they foment chaos, they have a religious theology that is incompatible with the West. They're not moderate Muslims, they're not progressives, they're very regressive, and they're very extreme in the way they think about it. Staunch. This would be like, you know, all the criticism of, for example, Catholic missionaries coming over to South America and just wiping out villages, convert or else, right? Now you can, in hindsight, justify it one way or the other, but there was a lot of brutality at the hands of Jesuit priests wielding a sword. You know what I'm saying? That's ISIS. If you want to know what it was like to live in South America circa 1600s, 1700s, then look at the Middle East under ISIS, convert or else. Okay. So, in fairness, Christianity woke up because we finally read our scriptures, we finally looked to our Lord and Savior and the message of peace, and we reformed. Okay, that's just in fairness, you don't see violent Christian missionaries out there spreading the word. You don't have to be by a tube. The Christianity was highly enlightened by the Reformation and the and the Enlightenment era. Okay, those principles sank in, and we read our scriptures and saw the message of peace of Jesus, right? Yep. So so, and I do believe like Saudi Arabia and Muhammad Ben Salin, I think that they're along that same. They're like, listen, the brutality's got to end. Women are gonna have to drive. At some point, we're gonna have to let people vote or have a say, or it'd be nice enough that that they consent to our governance, you know what I'm saying? Rather than constantly enforcing it with a sword. So Donald Trump says all of those countries that can't get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormouths, because now you've got a dozen countries around the world that are enacting austerity measures over the fuel situation, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran. I have a suggestion for you. Number one, buy from the US.

SPEAKER_15 42:13

Okay.

SPEAKER_10 42:13

We have plenty. And number two, build up some delayed courage, go to the strait and just take it.

SPEAKER_20 42:23

Wow.

SPEAKER_10 42:24

Don't rely on other people to fight your battles right now. You're a sovereign nation, you have a military, you've got nukes, go take it. Stop sending our sons and daughters to fight your wars because you want luxury. Either buy it from us and wipe your hands of the region or go take it. You'll have to start learning how to fight for yourself. The USA won't be there to help you anymore. Just like you weren't there for us. Iran has been essentially decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil. President DJT.

SPEAKER_17 43:09

What do you think about that? I think that that's a great message for them to understand that this uh conflict really does take, you know, blood and treasure of the people that get involved. And when you just sit back and just kind of kick back and let somebody else do your dirty work, you know, you just need to figure out how to roll up your own sleeves.

SPEAKER_10 43:29

Yeah. You want to be a moral guy like Spain, close the airspace, close the bases. Britain didn't want to participate. You can't use Diego Garcia. Okay. Oh, but oh, but cat fuel. Listen, the the milk is spilled. Who are you gonna buy it from? We got plenty. We got plenty. We're good. We can walk away from the Strait of Hermuz right now, and our life wouldn't be affected. Gas prices are already what they're at.

SPEAKER_17 43:56

Well, and you know, considering the fact that we don't get any oil from there in the First place, it was never impacting us to begin with.

SPEAKER_10 44:02

Yeah, and now we got our Venezuelan reserves coming online. I mean, there's no shortage. There's no shortage. It's just you've been buying from the bad guys. You've been buying from the bad guys. And you've been relying on wishy-washy politicians paying those guys off. You know, those pallets of cash that Obama sent, that ransom money to the barbers, the Barbary pirates that we did. Uh they just used it to foment terror. They didn't build new roads, they didn't fix potholes, they didn't build any new power generating stations with it. They just put sent cash out to their proxies to fight us. The hard work's been done. You want oil? Go take it. Build up some of that delayed courage.

SPEAKER_17 44:41

I was personally under the impression that um Iran was a proxy for Obama, who just wanted to use it as his personal piggy bank as he, you know, uh flaundered trillions of dollars for all his buddies around the world. I thought that's what was going on. I don't know.

USAID And The Impeachment Pipeline

SPEAKER_10 44:56

Yeah. Now, have you heard about the scandal with the USAID money in Ukraine?

SPEAKER_17 45:01

Oh well. Yeah. I think we've talked about it for weeks on here.

SPEAKER_10 45:06

So there's this, you know, all the conspiracies come true.

SPEAKER_17 45:10

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 45:11

So politicians from the left and right have been involved in Ukraine. People don't realize this, but Mitt Romney, I think it was his chief of staff, was sitting on the same barisma board as Hunter Biden.

SPEAKER_17 45:22

Yeah, that's why we keep calling it the Uniparty. The Uniparty? It's got more than one uh reason for calling it that.

SPEAKER_10 45:28

D the Democrat National Convention had their servers, their servers, not hosted in DC, not Hillary Clinton's water closet, not South Dakota in Ukraine. They had their servers in Ukraine, far away from where government subpoenas could get at them. Okay. So Ukraine has been the piggy bank of politicians. And that's we now have these wires that came across where the Ukraine, Zelensky, was telling Democrats, hey, give us funding and we'll kick money back into the Biden campaign, which then became the Harris campaign. In 2021, the Democrats were broke. 2022, they had all this fundraising right as we were funding Ukraine. And now we see the money. And now the question is, did they kick back? They talked about it. We have the emails saying let's plan this out. Did they do it?

SPEAKER_17 46:20

Oh, they had to.

SPEAKER_10 46:21

Oh yeah. As peasants, we can we can allege who cares what we think, right? Except for us. But of course they did it. Of course they did it. So now it's just a matter of are we gonna see any justice for it? So Chris Cuomo had on Michael Shellensberger, who's a limited hangout guy. Okay, fair enough. This is the guy that's trying to make Epstein go away and all that kind of stuff. But he had he had Michael Schellenberger on to talk about this because Chris Cuomo's paying the part of devil's advocate. Like, well, I don't think that happened, you know. And I I mean, how do you know that USAID money was being funneled right back into the Democrats? So let's listen to this back and forth here because Michael Schellenberger kind of enlightens him and explains to him kind of how we ended up with the Ukraine gate impeachment scandal that kind of was the kickoff of all of this.

SPEAKER_18 47:08

New reporting reveals that USAID and a CIA analyst were behind a project that later led to one of Trump's impeachments. Independent journalist Michael Schellenberger joins us to try to convince me that I should believe this. Shelley, always a pleasure. Good to see you, Mike. Great to see you, Chris. So tell me on it. How much do you believe this?

SPEAKER_14 47:34

Well, look, here's what we know. We know that USAID effectively created this organization called the Organized Crime and Corruption Research Project, Reporting Project, OCCRP, which nobody's heard of, but it teams up with well-known news media companies around the world. We know that it would not exist had it not rerouted a State Department grant uh from its narcotics enforcement division through USAID, and that USAID can sign off on all of the senior has to sign off, has a requirement to sign off on all the senior staff and on the work plan. We also know that it did the foundational research that was essential to bringing the impeachment case against Trump in December of 2019. It was what the CIA whistleblower um relied upon in his initial complaint in December or in uh in December of 2019. So um those are the facts of it. Wait, explain that part together and you explain that part.

SPEAKER_10 48:31

Okay, so let's follow this chart here. This is the same thing that happened with Russia Gate, right? You had a fake story that the FBI then gave to the media, which then the media published it, and they took Yahoo news reports into a FISA court, told the judge, hey, these guys are alleging that there's some Russia situation going on here with Trump, that they leaked to Trump based on knowingly false information generated by the Clinton campaign, Michael Steele, et cetera, et cetera, to get the warrants, to then create the allegations, which created the nonstop half decade of Russica stuff, which you still have people out there. Trump's a Russian agent. Oh my gosh. Cannot take back a first impression, can you? So this USAID money, that's our money, taxpayer dollars, government money going to nonprofit news organizations, which produce reports, which then the CIA agent used to report in Trump impeachment memo, which then triggered off in Russia Gate and Ukraine Gate impeachment number one. Yep. So you got to outline. It started with USAID money to create the story.

SPEAKER_18 49:36

Michael, explain what they funded and how it's connected to what the CIA agent and who that, you know, who that was, what we know, because I thought it was the original guy, was the British guy that was hired by the Appo Research Place that Clinton had been working with, and he was collecting it from his sources. What are you believing now?

SPEAKER_14 49:58

Yeah, I mean, this is the case of the, you remember this is where Trump talks about the perfect phone call with uh Ukrainian uh professional impeachment. Impeachment, yeah, of 2019. So uh this is basically a situation where the CIA person in the White House who had been left over by Obama writes a uh a complaint describing alleged violation of the law. This was then picked up in the House impeached uh Trump. The Senate, of course, declined to hear it. But I think what's so interesting here is that this is an organization that's behind it, that's funded by USAID, that would not exist without USAID, engaging in what I think you have to consider to be domestic politics, which is absolutely forbidden. You have to remember that our intelligence agencies are our foreign policy establishment of which USAID is a big part. It's not really an economic development agency. I think people misunderstand that part. It's really about soft power, it's about establishing the power of the United States in an in like an aggressive way, including in regime change, the head of this group, OCCRP, actually brags of helping to change the governments in four or five different countries, actually brags of the regime change. So this looks like regime change tactics that the CIA and USAID had done abroad being brought back home against Donald Trump.

SPEAKER_18 51:21

So, why did we need that? And what did they do that was on top of what we already knew? The call happened, it was recorded. There's no question that Giuliani was mucking around over there, and that Trump absolutely connected the relationship with Ukraine to what they could do to help Giuliani's efforts. So, why did they need any OOCRP or whatever they're called? And what do you think they added to the stew?

SPEAKER_14 51:49

I mean, I think the latter is not uh is not something that you have a consensus on in both parties, obviously. I mean, it was a partisan vote. It was Democrats, there's no Republicans that they got in the House. 100% the Senate obviously didn't hear it. And you know, Zelensky himself said he didn't feel pressured by Trump to go and dig up dirt on the Bidens. So that's just a matter of disagreement. It's a thin, I think if you look back retrospectively, it's a pretty thin case for impeachment. Um, it's pretty it's supposed to be high crimes and misdemeanors. So then you have to ask, well, where does it come from? And when you see that the two main organizations behind it are the CIA and USAID, which is basically considered a front-facing regime chain USAID makes America race.

SPEAKER_10 52:33

USAID saves lives. Poverty is not an accident like slavery at apartheid, it is man-made and can be removed by actions of human beings. Well, okay, sure, but what does USAID have to do with that? We know that it hasn't prevented anybody from getting AIDS or doing anything, right? It's basically the CIA's money laundering op where they can get money from Congress to go pass the money around. You know what I mean? Dark money. And think about this: the way USAID works with these other countries, and this is where Marco Rubio at the beginning of the administration said, no more money to NGOs. It's going straight to the government, right? Because what happens is you get in government, you make a couple contacts with some USAID money peddlers, you leave government and you have a nonprofit. And now you're a power broker in your own country getting fed by CIA to then influence. And you can stay there election after election while the little guys cycle in and out. We're gonna go change Uganda. No, you're not, right? Because you don't have money, but the money guys that'll play ball are getting the USAID. Now they're actually gonna give it to the government, which means they can hold the government accountable. Because if the NGO doesn't get results, what do they do? They turn around and go, the Uganda government sucks. So let's run a color revolution on them. Do you see what I'm saying? But the plausible deniability all the time for results. Now, if you give it straight to the country and they don't get results, just hold the money back. It doesn't sit and float in these NGOs forever, right?

SPEAKER_17 53:55

USDID money was never audited properly of any kind of auditation for the US government.

SPEAKER_14 54:02

CIA is covert, USAID is sort of the overt for US allies, it's propping up governments, it's doing work to support them. For countries that were a change in government, we're trying to interfere politically to overthrow them. That's what we do, that's what our global policy has been. Look, I mean, so one possibility, and I don't know that this is the reason I haven't heard from my sources, but I mean, look, you know, you have an agency that was engaged in what appears to be domestic politics going all the way back to Trump's impeachment. Could that have been one of the motives for why they decided that this was an organization that had to pay a very high price? I mean, it's really losing, really shutting down the whole organization.

SPEAKER_10 54:39

Hey, thanks. Yeah, yeah. Just like Venezuela had to pay a high price, and Iran has to pay a high price, you know, and Cuba's paying a high price. By the way, that Russian boat with oil that's heading to Cuba, Trump was like, Yeah, let him through. I want to be merciful to Cuba. I mean, people are suffering. So he like, you know, Russia's trying to have him call his bluff, and he's just like, no, he took the win. You know what I'm saying? He took the win. Yeah, go ahead. Let him give their oil. If Cuba's got money to pay, sure. But you know, Russia's giving them the oil, right? That's pretty good. So, John, uh, let me oop, wrong one. I want to go to this here. Um, this is this is uh Jeff Dornick on his podcast. And what he did was he took he took a whole bunch of court cases and he ran them through AI. I'm gonna let him explain it here. Okay, but he wanted to know like we have the law. You can just read it, it's pretty easy. You can do this, do that. It's a box.

SPEAKER_17 55:34

So is this gonna be about application of the law?

SPEAKER_10 55:36

This is application of the law by judges.

SPEAKER_17 55:39

All right.

SPEAKER_10 55:40

So this is this is okay, why we haven't seen accountability because we have a problem here. And one of the things I found going through J6 is I could have a little pity party and be like, my rights are violated. But I quickly realized the people that were violating my rights did it yesterday, they're gonna do it tomorrow, they're gonna do it the next day. There was never a moment where everybody's rights weren't being violated. Our simple understanding of the Bill of Rights, looking around going, you guys, you know, and this was my problem with some of the other defendants. It's like, this is wrong, and it's only ever happened to us. I'm like, no, it hasn't. You think we're the only ones in solitary confinement? I'm on a block full of people on solitary confinement. You know what I mean? For days and days and days and weeks on end.

SPEAKER_17 56:25

And it was happening before I got here.

SPEAKER_10 56:26

And it was happening before I got here, and it's happening today. You know what I mean? And I'm like, everybody who's been prosecuted by the DOJ feels like they got a raw into the deal. I'm like, so stop your pity party. We're in this together, right?

SPEAKER_03 56:39

So this is why it happens like that. I've taken specific motions and ruling from judges, and I've stuck it into AI. And I said, I want you to look at this. You're the top legal expert in the world because I trained my AI, the AI EUs has the education of the top Supreme Court justice in the world. It's a legal expert. It's taken classes at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Georgia. I've taken their motions and stuck them in there. I've taken judicial rulings. And I've asked it, I said, just from a neutral critical standpoint, analyze this judge's rulings and tell me whether or not it adhered to the law. I can tell you that the majority of the time, it forget majority, in 90-some odd percent of all documentation put in through there, the law has been manipulated, misinterpreted, misquoted, modified, basically lied about if you really want to get into it. AI has given them like an F rating on their rulings, an F rating on their motions and what they're doing. But there's no oversight because a judge has absolute immunity. He supposedly has all this latitude as a judge to make these rulings, but they're not following the law. They'll come up with every way because that's why the the you can ask the same question. That's why the DOJ has a 96, 7, 8% conviction rate. It's not because of it, it's because they cheat.

No Kings Protest And COVID Hypocrisy

SPEAKER_10 57:55

They cheat because they're kings in their kingdoms. They're kings in their little fiefdoms. And if you, you know, again, in a in the ultimate act of projection, right, the left always accuses the right, the conservatives, the people who want to follow the law and be equal under the law, they always accuse the the right of doing what they themselves are doing. So this weekend we had this No Kings rally.$500 million got spent. Eight million alleged people showed up around the country, most of them with gray hair, right, that watch that watch CNN and MS now way too much. Or showed up. But we know that it's not organic. We know that it's being funded. We know that they're being led by the kings, and who's allowing it to happen? Who's allowing this to happen? Okay. People are afraid that Trump's gonna come in with stormtroopers and clean this up, but he's not. He sits back and doesn't do anything, right? So who's allowing all these rights violations and all these things that they're actually protesting against? It's always the left. This woman, I think it was a TikTok video. She does a great little thing about, oh, you guys don't want a king, except for no kings.

SPEAKER_25 59:06

Unless it was during the pandemic when all the mom and pop businesses were shut down, but the government said it was totally fine for all the major super rich corporations to continue operating. I didn't really care. As long as I could get my Starbies and go to Target, I was fine. No kings. Except during the pandemic, when we told people that they would lose their job unless they took a certain medical product or they couldn't even go into certain restaurants without vaccine paperwork. That was crazy. But I didn't really care because I just complied. No kings. Remember when we also told people that they had to not visit their loved ones that were sick and dying in the hospital, the elderly, they had to die alone. That was really sad. We shut down the schools, completely wrecked the developmental learning for a whole generation. I mean, that was tragic, but we don't really talk about that. That's over now. New outrage, no kings. Remember when we were told over and over if we got that medical product, we for sure would not get sick. And even though the people that got it immediately did get sick, we were for sure told they wouldn't spread it. And then that gradually became, well, like 95%, like 75%. Okay, there's no evidence it does what we told everyone it does, but we've already made everyone take it that would anyway. And no one really cared because it's new outrage time, no kings. And do you remember during that time? Anyone who tried to bring attention to these issues on social media was censored or their account was banned. And limiting free speech at that time seemed okay to me. I didn't really think about it. No kings. You don't hate authoritarianism, you just hate what you're told to hate by the algorithm and the news outlets. It's so for real. I just wish the anti-authoritarian energy was present during actual tyranny from both the federal and local governments during that time. But no, of course not. And it's not authoritarianism if the majority of the people voted for it. Both popular vote and electoral votes, people wanted the border secure. So settle down. Settle down and start thinking for yourself. Turn off the TikTok. It's gonna be okay.

SPEAKER_10 1:01:15

Turn off the TikTok and turn on peasants pod. If you want to eat like a king, Ron, how can you eat like a king?

SPEAKER_17 1:01:21

Well, funny you should ask. Because uh today's sponsor is Chicago Steak Company, and they're giving away eight free steak burgers on every order. Code eight burgers. Think about the last time you bought burgers at the grocery store. You stood in there staring at a wall of plastic rack beef ground, trying to figure out which one isn't going to turn into a hockey puck on the grill. Maybe you grabbed the expensive organic pack, maybe you want went cheap. Either way, you got home, fired up the grill, and watched them shrink to half their size. Oh man, dry in the middle, falling apart through the grates. Oh, that's sad. Chicago Steak Company figured out a better way. They make half-pound steak burgers from USDA Prime Beef, hand formed from premium cuts, and ship them to your door on dry ice. They hold together on the grill, stay juicy, and actually taste like steak. Here's the deal: spend 189 or more on any steaks you want. Use code 8 burgers, and they add free eight free steak burgers plus a bottle of steak seasoning, plus free shipping on your next order. That's$200 and free extras on top of whatever you ordered. 15,000 five-star reviews. These people know what they're doing. Go to mychicagostake.com slash rubble code 8 burgers. Link in the description. Get them before they're gone.

SPEAKER_10 1:02:39

Yes, you gotta eat like a king. Steak, steak, and more steak. So Adam Carolla, funny comedian. Yeah. He says, You coward, or actually, we'll show that last. So let's show a couple sets back on.

SPEAKER_17 1:02:52

Okay.

SPEAKER_10 1:02:52

So this was an Illinois basketball hoop. Put some two by fours up there, tied up the nets. Can't go play basketball outside in the sun.

SPEAKER_17 1:02:58

Oh you got that one.

SPEAKER_10 1:03:00

You got this one. Uh, do you remember when they went out of the state? Oh, is this COVID? That's arrest made for surfing. Uh so the guy's out surfing, and the sheriff shows up in his boat to get the paddle border off the off the water. Right? Okay, no kings, no kings. Right. And who who let this these violations of our rights continue? Oh, I don't know. The judiciary. Here's this one skate park. Filling in the skate park so kids can go play.

SPEAKER_17 1:03:28

Gotta fill it with sand. Gotta fill it with sand. Make it unusable.

SPEAKER_10 1:03:31

Yep, make it totally unusable. No kings! No kings. It's not that you don't like authoritarianism. You love it when you're being told what to think about it, right? And then, and then, of course, the the the pull here. You coward, speaking to newsome. You are worried about government overreach. We did an experiment called COVID, and your side failed. California SWAT team comes out to a mom and her two kids to tell her to get off the beach. Don't you know? There's a deadly virus called the cold floating around. Again, you know, it's just one of those things where it's like, man, these guys are kinks. And how did they pull it off? They pulled it off by the judiciary sitting back and doing nothing. The judiciary sitting back and doing nothing. So John Solomon was on with uh he was on with Don Jr. Donald Trump Jr. I do know his name, but it's easy to pronounce. So when you think about all the lawsuits, because there were a lot of lawsuits that came before the judiciary, and a lot of them just said, well, the government says there's a virus and they deferred, they deferred, they deferred. Prima fase violation of First Amendment rights, second amendment rights, fourth amendment rights, fifth amendment rights, sixth amendment rights, right? It just goes on and on and on how much overreach there was, and the judiciary sat back and did nothing. Stuff that, you know, reasonable people are just like, You can't shut our business down. You know, you can't tell us to stay home, you can't keep the kids home from school, you can't close the beach, the park. I mean, one of the interviews we did was Sarah Brady, the mom and meridian who took her kids to the park on the very day that the CDC says the virus can't live in sunlight or on plastic or on metal. And yet you had a police officer that was willing to tape off, well, it was actually the park manager that didn't have authority to do it, taped off the park. And when the parents showed up, Sarah Brady was like, What are you doing here? Totally in opposite of truth and science. It was just authoritarian rule. So why haven't we had all of these criminals just frog marched out and arrested? Well, because the judiciary is not set up to actually enforce the law.

SPEAKER_17 1:05:37

What I wanted to say, it's because there's too many people just like me projecting our goodness.

SPEAKER_10 1:05:45

Projecting our goodness. We think the judge is your grandpa and he's a fair and reasonable person. And he might sound fair and reasonable, but when you actually break down the law, which most of us don't know, right, we realize these judges are just charting their course.

SPEAKER_17 1:06:00

Goodness is providing them cover.

SPEAKER_10 1:06:02

Exactly. And so why haven't we had accountability? Well, the few times we've tried to have some accountability, the cases have been dismissed on you know election fraud. Uh, no standing. I was in the election. Well, you don't have standing. Okay, well, I'm a voter. Well, you don't have standing. I'm the president of the United States. You don't have standing. I'm the state of Texas suing all the other states that broke the constitution and the pact we have that will all enforce our elections equally. You don't have standing. Okay, well, it's after the election and we have evidence of fraud. Ah, latches, it's too late. Right? Oh, hey, my rights were violated, my business was closed down. Well, it's too bad for you, you know, like over and over again. And then Comey gets arrested. Oh, the attorney wasn't appointed properly. Have you looked at the evidence? I mean, you push it through every other time. Jack Smith wasn't appointed properly either. Yeah, he opened up cases wherever he wanted.

SPEAKER_17 1:06:50

If there was anybody, any case where you could push it through, can we make it this one?

SPEAKER_10 1:06:55

Yeah, can we make it this one? Exactly. The one where there's actually a violation, not the one where Carter Page is not a CIA agent.

SPEAKER_17 1:07:02

And also the one that's going to impact every American and not just one American.

SPEAKER_10 1:07:07

So John Solomon was on with Don Jr. talking about maybe what's coming up with some of these new grand juries and things and kind of what they're up against and why there hasn't been mass accountability.

SPEAKER_29 1:07:17

Sort of just mentioned, you know, we've been covering the fraud everywhere. Minnesota, uh, California, you know, rampant, and I'm sure they'll get into a lot of that. But you know, now Ukraine. I mean, JD Vance has a fraud task force, Kash Patel is turbocharging the fraud probes. Uh, we have a new joint task force with the FBI and HSI uh in the one big beautiful bill. Uh how can we bring all of this together uh to deliver you know actual indictments and recover funds? Because you know, it it's we see this stuff all the time. We we it it just it's almost a never-ending amount of fraud and almost a never-ending amount of you know culprits. Uh, you know, yet, you know, I know I do, and I'm sure all the people watching, you know, they want to see indictments. Now they got to understand there is a process, you know, maybe explain that a little bit. Because if you break the process, you break that sort of uh you know chain a little bit, uh, you know, it it's a lot worse because not only will nothing happen, uh, you know, they'll they'll they'll they'll weasel out of it and probably continue this stuff. But can you talk a little bit about that? Because again, I think people do want action. It seems the Democrats get action uh without following the rules. We we won't get that. It'll get venue shocked to a judge who would throw it out in two seconds. So we have to play by a different fact set, unfortunately. Uh, but how does all that work right now?

SPEAKER_24 1:08:27

Well, I think one of the things that you're seeing is a little bit of innovation by the Trump Justice Department in where they pick venues. So, you know, if you go to DC and New York, you're not going to get a conviction. Traditionally, that's where most big government fraud cases have gone. However, if a single subcontractor is in another state, or if a single contractor or NGO is in another state, you're seeing this Trump Justice Department move cases to those states. That's how the grand conspiracy case is now down in Miami. Uh, last week you saw Bill Poulty, the uh federal housing finance administration director and the head of Fannie Mac and Freddie, uh Freddie Mack and Fannie Mae. He uh referred Letitia James a second time. She gets cleared in Northern Virginia the first time. He sends a second referral this time. He sends it to Florida and to Chicago because that's where the um mortgage insurance companies or the house insurance companies uh were based. That's an innovative way of uh potentially tackling this and getting around some of the jury nullification issues that we've seen in DC and New York. Um, there is a brand new assistant attorney general just for fraud. So there's a whole new division of the Justice Department dedicated to fraud. New resources, new mindset, new top-down management. This case, if it were to be proven, if you could find the grant and the money moving, it would be tailor-made for that division. And then you'd bring it in the venue where the best uh or the jurisdiction where the best opportunity is for conviction based on the evidence. And so uh Okay.

Election Tech Theft And Duplicate Rolls

SPEAKER_10 1:09:57

So that's what they've got to do. They've got to move around because they're moving around the judiciary. The problem is the judiciary, and if you get a jury poll that's already kind of, you know, in DC, it's saying leans left, it's Illinois or New York, it leans left. And then you get a judge that's like, yeah, you know, you must convict, you must, or you must acquit, whatever, whatever they push, they're gonna get. And this problem is broad and wide. And he mentions there, if any subcontractor, anybody who participates in this stuff is in a different jurisdiction, you can you can have the entire case in that jurisdiction. So we covered a special election last week down in in uh Florida where Donald Trump's local state representative, it flipped, right? We ended up getting a Democrat down in Palm Springs. What happened there? And it and there's a lot of Republicans going, oh, see, Trump's becoming less and less popular. And oh my gosh, we're gonna get blown out in the midterms. And my statement has been the same. If anybody is talking about losing the midterms and they're not qualifying it with if we don't stop the cheating, they're manipulating you. They're manipulating you into thinking that America doesn't support Trump, that America doesn't want a closed border, that America doesn't want vengeance on our enemies, that America doesn't want cheap oil, that America doesn't want job opportunities, that America, you know what I mean? They're gaslighting you.

SPEAKER_17 1:11:15

Right. Don't forget that he has an 80% approval rating on a lot of things that he's pushing through, that he actually won the presidency, that there's all these other positive things happening.

SPEAKER_10 1:11:25

So there was an arrest down in Palm Beach this last weekend. There was an arrest of an election worker who's tied to one of these NGOs. Okay. Here's a picture of him. Okay. These are ballots, these are tabulators, and that's his hand. There's a video of this. That's his hand pulling out the little data card out of that and taking it home with him.

SPEAKER_17 1:11:48

Oh no.

SPEAKER_10 1:11:49

So here's the guy who ended up. I think this is uh, I can't remember which one won the election, it doesn't matter. Okay, but it's home of Donald Trump's voice. Holy crap, a Palm Beaks election official off volunteer just got arrested for stealing an encrypted access key and computer equipment in the March 24th special election, where a Democrat won by 800 votes. Man, if they could win square and square, you wouldn't have to do this. This is a district that includes Mar-Lago. Investigators worry that encryption, used for training, allegedly, couldn't could be reverse-engineered and used to tamper with voter registration. The theft was reported on March 27th, a few days after last Tuesday's special election per WPTV. The theft occurred on March 19th, just days before the election. During the search of John Penici's home, detectives recovered the stolen items along with a substantial amount of electronic and digital storage devices. Penici was transported to the Palm Beach County jail and booked on charges. Election integrity is vital to our republic. Right there. Tiny little election. Tiny little election. And it's gonna be that that seat will be up for re-election in November, but now you have a Democrat incumbent there. So court system, hello, let's figure this out. Suspend the seat, hold it open, force another election under tons of scrutiny. They're gonna do it. No, they got a guy sitting in jail for taking electronic devices, which should invalidate everything that touched that machine at a minimum. Yeah, it should invalidate the entire election. But oh, that that would create a problem with continuity of government.

SPEAKER_17 1:13:25

Oh, that's be too hard. Oh, it'd be way too hard. Oh my goodness. I don't know how we ever have an election in the first place.

SPEAKER_10 1:13:32

Yeah. So Devin Nunes, along with um Peter Schweitzer, were on with Maria Barcelomo talking about again, more of this government corruption and when and if there's going to be some accountability.

SPEAKER_28 1:13:45

Now the chairman of the President's Outside Intelligence Advisory Committee. And Devin, I want to kick things off with you. Give us your sense of where we are today after that subpoena of Jim Comey.

SPEAKER_06 1:13:57

Well, the only thing that I would add to that, Maria, is this hoax is ongoing. This is a conspiracy that's gone on for a decade.

SPEAKER_10 1:14:04

It's ongoing. I just showed you in Miami, someone flipped an election. If any, if any money that he received or his electronic devices show communication with somebody in Georgia and somebody in DC, this is an ongoing conspiracy that we are living through. It's amazing the headwinds Donald Trump is up against. When RFK says he knows how to wield power better than possibly any president ever. Oh my goodness, yes.

SPEAKER_06 1:14:32

Could you imagine what he's up against here? And remember, you you mentioned about Clinton trying to win, but what it really was about was covering up for her missing emails. That's what it originates with. And then it goes into the ICA that you just talked about. It goes into the molar witch hunt, it goes into the Ukraine impeachment hoax. It goes all the way, we can just fast forward, to the rate at Mar-a-Lago. So the victim in this is President Trump, his family, his associates, campaign members. We now know senators, congressmen. I think virtually everyone has brought been brought into this conspiracy over the last 10 years. So Florida is the right home for this. It's what myself and other uh scholars have been talking about that this is the victims were mostly in Florida. This is where it should be centered. So I think in breaking news this week uh was that the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rick Crawford, actually released, voted to release transcripts of former CI Director John Brennan. This was at the request of the Department of Justice. Now, I don't know where those documents are going, but my guess is that they're headed down to Florida as part of this larger conspiracy case that, as I said, goes back to 2015-16 timeframe with Hillary Clinton hiding her emails because she probably thought the Russians or someone were going to release them. And then they tried to frame President Trump and his campaign. So this is where this investigation's going. It's been a long time, as you said. We all want accountability, uh, but you'd have to work at this day by day, step by step, to try to deliver this accountability and hope that the Department of Justice can bring significant charges against the perpetrators.

SPEAKER_28 1:16:09

And who knows what uh was in those emails, right? The Hillary Clinton emails and whether they were treasonous. You mentioned John Brennan. I mean, he has a severe animosity for President Trump and uh, you know, attacked him uh even as he was involved in that Russia collusion story.

SPEAKER_06 1:16:28

Yeah, and look, when and you we also know that in 2016, when he came to brief us, and he briefed us on this supposed Russian uh thing that was going on, was very vague about it at the time. Well, we now know, not we didn't know at the time, but we know today, that he knew this was a hoax. He knew that the Clinton campaign was playing a game and that they were trying to cover up for the emails. That was all declassified at the end of President Trump's last term. But now it's taken this long to try to get accountability and hold these people accountable who weaponized the justice system. And that is what the president has really asked his intelligence board to do is to de-weaponize, get all the information out, make it all public, show the sunlight on it, and then hopefully uh the victims of these crimes, and there's so many of them, there's so many. It's not just President Trump and his family, Maria, it's dozens and dozens of people who lost everything in this conspiracy. But most importantly, it's making America unsafe. The weaponization of intelligence does not help us win battles in Iran to track down terrorists, to do what we did in Venezuela. We got to get the intelligence agencies back to what their original intent is, and that is to provide actual intelligence, real intelligence with analytical integrity that guarantees that policymakers can make at least informed decisions as they try to guide the world in a very difficult time we have now.

SPEAKER_28 1:17:55

Well, I'd like to see if we actually get conspiracy charges. And that would be uh uh uh the first step in that road. Peter Schweitzer, your reaction.

SPEAKER_09 1:18:06

Uh yeah, I think what we clearly have is the intentionality that James Comer uh intentionally manipulated uh the intelligence system in an effort to undermine Donald Trump. Let's remember when the when the FISA court uh scandal erupted uh and the IG report came out and said there were 17 inaccuracies or errors, um, you know, Jim Comey said, oh, it was just sloppiness. Uh then you go to what Chairman Nunes was talking about, uh specifically the rewriting of this intelligence assessment in December of 2020, sorry, of 2016, after they had briefed Congress days earlier that Pat that Putin had no intentionality of intervening. He had no preferences between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. They rewrote that intelligence assessment, and James Comey was central to it. So you have intentionality. And the question is, what was the goal here? Barack Obama was leaving the White House, Donald Trump was coming in, the intentionality was to disrupt and undermine the normal functioning of the American government. So if there's any classical definition of a conspiracy to undermine the government's function, this to me seems to fit it.

SPEAKER_28 1:19:16

Do you two believe that if the Republicans lose the midterm elections, that these investigations die? What do you think, Devin?

SPEAKER_06 1:19:24

No, I think the investigation is going to go on. What we're seeing down in Florida right now, at least what's being reported, the fact that subpoenas are going out, I feel very confident that these investigations are going to continue.

SPEAKER_28 1:19:35

Okay, Peter, final word.

SPEAKER_09 1:19:38

I think they'll continue, but the Democrats in Congress will try to hamstring them uh with budgets and other kinds of uh pressures. So it will be a street fight.

SPEAKER_10 1:19:47

And that's the whole thing. Between the judges, right? You can create this incontrovertible evidence that makes it like they can't rule against it, but at the same time, they'll try. You know, any any loophole they can do, they could they could throw out there. And then if you get the Democrats behind them, giving the judges air cover, right? Hamstringing budgets, you know, Trump's only had 14 U.S. attorneys uh nomin uh confirmed. 14. He tried to get 50. 14. I mean, it's pretty pretty dramatic stuff here.

SPEAKER_17 1:20:18

Jamie Bance, you know, hold on before we go on. You know, we were talking about Hillary's emails. Can you remind me? My memory's a little shaky. How does Benghazi fit into all this?

SPEAKER_10 1:20:29

Okay, so Hillary Clinton had a private email server in her Chappaquakwa house or whatever, literally in the bathroom. And that's where she was hosting government emails. Just totally wrong, which basically made them exempt from FOIA because they didn't have the servers to produce them. And so on that server, we don't know what's there. I'm sure there's some Benghazi stuff, I'm sure there's some let's bomb some citizens in Libya and Yemen. I'm sure there's some let's take Gaddafi's gold emails. I'm sure there's some 9-11 shadow commission stuff on there. There's probably some pizzagate stuff on there. There's a lot of stuff on there.

SPEAKER_17 1:21:05

So hold on though, the Benghazi, though, weren't there some servers in the um in the embassy? Yeah, in the embassy.

SPEAKER_10 1:21:16

You know, I don't probably uh nothing.

SPEAKER_17 1:21:19

I think that there were I think that there were some Hillary servers in the Benghazi embassy.

SPEAKER_10 1:21:23

Were there Hillary servers or just servers that would have had the cables?

SPEAKER_17 1:21:26

Uh well that's a good question, but it it my recollection is that the whole thing with Benghazi and why that whole thing went down was because somebody wanted those servers to disappear.

SPEAKER_10 1:21:40

Maybe. Possibly. Oh, let's move on. Let's move on. I we definitely have not gotten to the bottom of Benghazi. Uh Simon Dapa Dappa Papado says, as Teco Andromeda on Spotify, and then Tiffany 6967 says the same thing. Andromeda as Teco on Spotify. So I don't know what that is. Go check it out, guys. Debbie 6265, dang, don't make them think it's above their pay grade and causes headaches. Yes, it does. So let's think this through here a little bit. If the Republicans don't win the midterms and the Senate gets a majority flip to the Democrats, what do you think is gonna happen? Almost for sure an impeachment, right? Likely a conviction at this point. Because you're we're talking about raw power. We're not talking about rule of law, we're not talking about American constitutional norms. We're past that. 98.2% conviction rate. There's nothing constitutional about that, right? Oh, it's sloppy. Ah, he's a criminal. Throw him in jail anyways. Oh, it's sloppy. Oh, he's politically connected. Let him out. You know, they just had a judge up in Minnesota that the one of the Minnesota fraud scandals that was working its way through the courts kind of before Nick Shirley did his thing. They just got sentenced to one year in prison for millions and millions and millions of dollars in fraud. I got seven years and three months for pushing a freaking gate, man. Pushing a freaking gate. But it was because of what we stood for when we did that. In that case, that's that's what I call buying silence. A one year, and by the way, the way it works in the Fed system, and I don't know necessarily the states usually they usually get more good time in the state, but in the feds, with First Step Act, which a fraud crime qualifies for, it's like they're probably gonna spend six months in prison if it was feds. So the states, like I know in Missouri, when you get a 10-year sentence, you you serve like 15% of it. So you're in like a year and a half on a 10-year sentence, and then you got like you know, halfway house and probation for the rest. So they do they do massive reductions on sentences at the state level for certain crimes. So likely this person's gonna spend a matter of months in jail. That's silence, right? And the restitution was under the level of fraud, which means they got to keep some of the money. Pretty bad. So JD Vance is saying, listen, we've got to end the filibuster because if the Democrats get back in power, they're gonna do what they tried to do last time and bust it, and then we're gonna have a total mess on our hands.

SPEAKER_19 1:24:06

The problem is we actually do not have 50 senators, not who would vote for the Save Act, but who would overrule the filibuster. That's something that a majority have of the Senate. You need 50 senators plus me, and I'm certainly on board, 50 senators to actually overrule this archaic rule and pass the Save America Act. Now, here, this is the thing that I find so absurd about this. If you remember Kirsten Cinema and Joe Manchin, two people I didn't always agree with politically moderate Democrats, but very good people. They are the people who saved the filibuster when the Democrats were in control of the Senate just a couple of years ago. What happened to them?

SPEAKER_10 1:24:42

They were t and why is that? It's not because they didn't want to get Democrat legislation passed, but it's because they knew that the Democrats were gonna pack the court, they were gonna do some big, big things that they knew were not good for America, right? Joe Manchin was not opposed to Green Bills and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Cinema wasn't either. But what they were opposed to was fundamentally changing the way the system operates. Okay. That makes sense to me. Republicans are not gonna pack the court, okay? Republicans just want to, you know, codify the border being closed, you know, you know, codify tax cuts and codify some executive order policies and way too nice.

SPEAKER_19 1:25:22

Hard and feathered by the far left, they were ran out of town. So when Mitch McConnell and Lisa Murkowski say, well, we need to protect the filibuster because the Democrats, they're not gonna do it, so we shouldn't do it either. The Democrats ruined the career of Kirsten Cinema for not overruling the filibuster. They're going to do it. So we might as well do it now to enforce the protection of the American electoral system. It's the dumbest political argument I've ever seen. I promise you, Benny, I would bet every dollar that I own that the next time the Democrats have control of the Senate, they will break the filibuster, hack the Supreme Court, and destroy this country. We have to do it now in order to save the country. Yes. Yes.

SPEAKER_10 1:26:07

The filibuster is not constitutional. That's a lot of people think it is. No, it's not. It's a Senate rule. They can change it on a dime. You know what I mean? They could change the rules to where all debate happened on the floor, no committees. It's all it's parliamentarian stuff. Like it's all construct. They can change whatever they want. And the Democrats absolutely will change it. And if you have any further proof of this, and any further proof that the Republicans are in on this scam, while we were gone, gener Senator John Thune at 3 a.m., I think on Thursday night, oh boy, had basically passed an amendment to throw that whole DHS funding back to the House, which is unacceptable. Defunds ICE, you know, unacceptable bill and closed debate, and they took off for a two-week vacation. That's two vacations in 40 days for the Senate now. Okay. So Senator Lindsey Graham heads down to of all places, guess where? Disney World. He was seen, he's got he's unmarried, he's got no kids. He was seen having breakfast at Disney World with mini mini mouse serving food. Okay. Wow, why is this single bachelor in his late ages showing up at Disneyland? I don't know, man. It's creepy as all get out.

SPEAKER_23 1:27:24

Oh boy.

SPEAKER_10 1:27:25

But, anyways, they fled town. This is a huge betrayal to the American people to just shut down the Senate. But it's not totally shut down. They have a shadow skeleton because if they go into recess for a two-week vacation, Trump could get his appointees and you know, recess appointments, and you could get some stuff done. Nope. They opened up the Senate every day for a minute. Open up, close down. Open up, close down. Literally one minute sessions to keep the to keep the Senate in session, technically, while senators are at home for two weeks on vacation. So really. So Chris Van Holland, Senator uh Chris Van Holland, Democrat, was on with Jonathan Carl. On ABC's this week, and he's being asked about this bill that got sent back to the House to basically, you know, defund ICE and defund immigration and all this stuff. And Jonathan Carl just kind of wasn't having any of it. But listen to this, listen to this argument. This is what we're up against. These people are incoherent.

SPEAKER_20 1:28:19

I guess what's confusing here is you have fought and blocked the funding for the Department of Homeland Security because you object, as you just outlined, to what ICE has been doing. And you wanted to force changes. And yet, the only thing that has been assured throughout all of this is that ICE already has the money.

SPEAKER_10 1:28:40

I just want to point something out here. I'm just paying attention down here on their little, you know, Chris Van Hall, and then they're going to go to the powerhouse roundtator, and then the funding can pass. Dem's Mar Lago win.

SPEAKER_15 1:28:49

Huh.

SPEAKER_10 1:28:50

The one that the guy stole the computer chip that just got arrested. I don't have this clip, but I'd be really curious. They're probably going to sit there and talk about well, the Republicans are at real risk in the midterms. If the Republicans don't defund ICE and open the border back up and offer amnesty to all the illegal aliens and fund the Ukraine war and ah, well, the Republicans are going to lose the midterms. That's what ABC is selling you. What's the actual peasants' perspective? That election wasn't fair. I don't know who won or didn't won. And nobody should make any claims one way or the other. But that politician should not be seated until it's revoted and figured out and we can see that it's clean and fair. The machines are a problem. When some worker, some nobody volunteer can grab one of the chips out of why do you need it?

SPEAKER_17 1:29:37

Why is it accessible?

SPEAKER_10 1:29:39

Not just why is it accessible? Why would a volunteer steal something like that out of it? Right. There's only one thing I can think of. I know when I go to volunteer in the midterms to help count the vote here in Kit Set County, I won't be taking anything home with me.

SPEAKER_20 1:29:56

All right, let's continue on here. Because as you said,$75 billion passed in the budget bill last year. So you're holding up the entirety of the Department of Homeland Security because you object to ICE and you want changes to ICE. But but through it all, ICE continues to have the money in it.

SPEAKER_10 1:30:13

John, we're not holding it. So that's the bull crap. In the big beautiful bill, ICE was funded for like 10 years or some long period of time. So they actually have to claw back money. So they they're holding up TSA. I saw the lines this weekend. I sat on a tarmac for almost an hour because Las Vegas couldn't receive us. So we sat in Seattle for an hour on the tarmac. So this is affecting the daily lives of anybody who's got air travel. This is leaving our border open because they're holding up all of the funding for DHS to try to claw back from ICE, which was already funded.

SPEAKER_21 1:30:46

All of the money for all the Department of Homeland Security. That's just a false statement. We have said repeatedly repeatedly, we should fund TSA, we should fund FEMA, we should fund the Coast Guard. We are not prepared to give ICE another$10 billion on top of the monies they already have and are using in many of these lawless operations. We're not going to give them another$10 billion unless they make fundamental.

SPEAKER_20 1:31:18

And fighting over that additional$10 billion, you are holding up the rest of Department of Home Office. We're not holding it up. I mean, you're saying John, we're not holding it up. We have now voted 10 times. But you're holding up in unless it doesn't include money for ice. That's just a fact.

SPEAKER_10 1:31:33

I guess what's that's the point. Right? So they've done they've the Republicans put out a bill, okay, standalone bill, TSA, DHS. Nope, won't do it. You have to claw back. Okay, another standalone bill. Nope, can't do it, claw back. But then they'll submit a bill and they'll vote on it that's basically defund ice, but go yeah, go ahead and pay the Coast Guard TSA. Right? So it's like they're totally you talk about power, Democrats, the party, know how to wield power, right? They they hold on to that filibuster, boys and girls, because we've got just a couple votes to keep everything blocked up, and the Republicans are utterly feckless. Why? I'll propose this because they're on the take. They're on the take. Obviously, which is why this weekend you had a handful of Republicans that came out, they started floating the idea of amnesty. All right, whatever. So this is the face of the nation, and they're talking, uh, they've got a Democrat congressman on here because Trump last week said, listen, executive order, I've directed Mark Wayne Mullen to just pay TSA, pay him. Okay, just pay him out of executive funds, whatever. And it's gonna go to the courts, of course, but at least we can get these guys paid and keep them on the job. Because the problem is, you know, after 40 days, eventually, as a TSA worker, you're like, maybe I'll be a security guard at the mall.

SPEAKER_17 1:32:57

Yeah, I'm gonna bounce.

SPEAKER_10 1:32:59

Yeah, at the end of the day, what do you do? You're running a metal detector. Ah, no, I could run a metal detector anywhere.

SPEAKER_17 1:33:04

Right.

SPEAKER_10 1:33:05

And so the idea that they're going to then go to the courts.

SPEAKER_12 1:33:10

What did Democrats get out of this standoff?

SPEAKER_08 1:33:16

Yeah, well, um, Margaret, the standoff is not done yet, right? The president is illegally paying, apparently, TSA agents. Um, you had the Senate, as you pointed out with Mr. Homan, pass a bipartisan bill unanimously in the United States Senate to say, look, let's fund everybody else and let's deal with this thorny issue about ice. Uh, and then you had the Republican House say, hell no, we're not doing that. What did Democrats get?

Taxes Drive People Out

SPEAKER_10 1:33:41

So they're gonna go work it through the courts and see if they can't stop. These guys will use power like you wouldn't believe, man. And you know, everything is touched by the election. So Washington State, Bob Ferguson yesterday signed into law the quote-unquote millionaires tax fanfare. So this guy, Silo Marks, he's been going through all the voter registration data and stuff like that. And here, Bob uh uh Governor Ferguson won the last election here in Washington with 55.6 percent of the vote, a 433,550, 550% lead.

SPEAKER_17 1:34:18

Seems pretty substantial.

SPEAKER_10 1:34:19

Yep, and Dave Reichart got 44.4 percent. Well, here's the deal. So here's our voter registration, and this is the duplicates, right? So you come down to Washington, Washington has 427,000 duplicates. Oh mighty close to that number. Are you kidding me? Mighty close to that number. Governor Bob Ferguson won Washington by 433,550 votes in 2024. Washington had 427,038 duplicate registrations.

SPEAKER_17 1:34:45

Oh my god.

SPEAKER_10 1:34:46

We do vote by mail, universal. There are no polling stations to go to. We do drop boxes, and we run on Dominion machines with, I guess, a couple other machines, which are all the same mixed in. Now tell me, you did a little digging into Kitzap County in 2020. What did you find there?

SPEAKER_17 1:35:05

Well, I can't remember now. I can't remember the details, but there seems like there was a very high percentage of voter turnout, which was pretty unusual. And um I I think I need to go revisit those numbers before I can give you an affirmative answer. But there were some irregularities. I'll say the uh obvious irregularities.

SPEAKER_10 1:35:26

Yes, obvious irregularities, like overvoting.

SPEAKER_17 1:35:29

Oh, yeah. Yeah, like overvoting. Very high turnout. We had a very high turnout. It was like close to 90%, which is like are you kidding me?

SPEAKER_10 1:35:38

Now put the pieces together, right? The Chinese hack the voter systems, you've got duplicate registrations, they knew they know who's not going to vote, so they can steal those ballots. They've got duplicate ballots, which is enough to throw in a governor, right? To throw any state race with 420,000 extra votes on top of the ones that they could vote that aren't duplicate, but they know don't vote. So when you have these high voter turnout moments, I can't remember how what's the population of our state?

SPEAKER_17 1:36:10

Isn't it like 6.5 million? Yeah, so we only had what 15% extra votes.

SPEAKER_10 1:36:17

Yeah, and we have a declining state population right now. So right. So this is Jamie Peterson from he's Democrat a leader. He's the Democrat, he's the Democrat. Is he in the House? Oh, this guy. Senator. He's the he's the majority leader in the Senate, and he's talking about income because Washington State has determined that income is property.

SPEAKER_17 1:36:39

Get ready to be lied to, right?

SPEAKER_10 1:36:41

Income is property. So we just passed this millionaire tax to tax the income of millionaires, which will eventually be probably everybody. And the whole premise of that is well, your income is not your personal property, so it would be apportioned taxing on property, et cetera, et cetera. Listen to this rationale.

SPEAKER_01 1:36:59

These are the brilliant guys who just provided us with this bill. Once it has become income, this is not, if you think about it, I've been trying to think of good analogies to this. We sometimes have people who come into the United States, right? But they're not considered to have been in the United States because of the legal mechanism by which they got here, right? So there's a question about whether you're lawfully present. So this is it's just an immigration idea. This is maybe makes sense only to lawyers.

SPEAKER_10 1:37:32

Once now, he's not arguing at the Supreme Court tomorrow that's hearing the birthright citizenship case where people can be here, but not really under the jurisdiction thereof. He's making that argument talking about income tax. But only attorneys would understand this because it's all made up bullshit, man. Exactly what I wanted to say. I traded my labor for money. That money is now my property. End of a story. Okay. But no, I mean, if it's not under the jurisdiction, so is the money not under my jurisdiction, so it's in my bank account, but my bank account's not mine. Like, what are you talking about here?

SPEAKER_17 1:38:05

Hold on, Taylor. You gotta do the right hand signals.

SPEAKER_10 1:38:11

So it's like where the money, the income comes, not immigrants not in the jurisdiction they're up. But you guys want jurisdiction to count them for the census, right? Well, they're not here legally. So there are people that are not here legally then. Is that what you're conceding?

SPEAKER_17 1:38:25

That's a hard question.

SPEAKER_10 1:38:28

So here's here's Brandy Cruz posted this. This is when the bill was signed. So here we go, Washington.

SPEAKER_27 1:38:34

I'm proud to join all of you in making history today. By signing into law Senate Bill 6346, the millionaire tax.

SPEAKER_10 1:38:50

Meanwhile, Washington, the most beautiful state, which by the way, down in Vegas, the desert has its own unique beauty. And oh my gosh, the weather was amazing. We got we got off the airplane about 3 a.m. and it was like 78 degrees. It was like a summer day out here. There's no sunburnt, nice and warm, shorts and flip-flops. But you missed the trees. It was amazing. You know, we went out to the Hoover Dam. I got my damn hat on, Hoover Dam. Okay, it was a lot of fun. But look at this here. So this is California. And I, you know, one of my great friends, uh Lisa from 1776 Live, she lives down in Southern California. She's like, we gotta get you to move down here. I'm like, Lisa, I'm not moving to California, right? But look at this here. So this is a map of the flight of people out of California. Oh man. Now I want to point a couple things out. As you're looking at these dots, so here's Southern California, these are LA, I think that's San Diego. I'm not exactly sure where that is. This is San Francisco's, you know, Silicon Valley, San Jose. Those people can stay there. Notice how these lines are flowing to the northwest, whereas the people in the diaspora, conservatives out in the countryside, they're all spreading out all over the country. But look at that.

SPEAKER_17 1:40:05

Whoa.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:06

So you have some tech guys going to Austin.

SPEAKER_17 1:40:08

It looks like everybody's going to Ellensburg.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:10

Some well, I yeah, it's not showing exactly where they're going. Oh, but you know, you've got guys in LA actors heading to Austin, Joe Rogan's.

SPEAKER_15 1:40:19

Right.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:20

Right. And uh, I mean, this is stunning. Yeah, stunning.

SPEAKER_17 1:40:25

So you can I like that in the end where they put the bullets on there for the size.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:30

Yeah. So Washington, we're getting a lot of tech workers that are coming up here, probably to avoid taxes, and they're gonna start fleeing too. But yeah, look at that. I mean, it's they're going everywhere.

SPEAKER_17 1:40:43

Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington are the big hitters.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:47

No tax, no tax, no tax, no tax, big ones.

SPEAKER_17 1:40:52

There wasn't any tax.

SPEAKER_10 1:40:53

Wasn't any tax. Anyways, really interesting that that thing. And and Washington, we have had an official decrease. Now, Ari Hoffman posted this. Comes from Mila Joy. She's kind of an engagement farmer, but this is a California personal income tax. Somebody moved from California to Florida in 2022. The letters dated 2026. So California is bankrupt. They have a budget problem. So they're doing everything they can to claw some of that money back. We are examining your California personal income tax return for the year listed above. 2022 to begin our examination. Please provide the following. They want your reported wages for the time, your complete copies of involvement in agreements, or similar uh any employment agreements or similar documentation per uh pertaining to Metili Gala's employment, complete copies of all pay stubs, right? And then provide a brief narrative of the events and circumstances surrounding you becoming non-residents of California. Taxes are too damn high and crime is out of control. Okay. With your response, please provide specific move out date as it was not reported on the 2022 California 540 non-resident return for each shipment of household, personal, vehicle, etc., items from California to Florida during the timeframe of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, complete copying of moving invoices, complete copy of moving company household goods inventory, and a copy of canceled checks or other documents subsaying the payments made to each moving company. May you choose, uh, you may choose to represent yourself or authorize someone to represent you during this examination. This is worse than getting a divorce. Yeah. So you moved it six years later, five, four years later, they're like, oh, by the way, we need to know the exact date you moved because we're gonna take everyone.

SPEAKER_17 1:42:40

Because we're calculating how much money you need to give us. Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:42:44

If you receive letters like this, you've got to go check out 1776live.us. We have remedy for this stuff. Okay, we have a way to deal with this that isn't gonna result in you ripping your hair out and burning yourself, you know, the altar of California's debt problems. On top of that, Keith Swank, uh sheriff down in Pierce County, who I quite love, um, he said this Democrats in Olympia pass legislation that makes it impossible for us to use license plate readers without jeopardizing our deputies. This legislation will make it more difficult to solve violent crimes and find missing loved ones. So this his is pro press release. And basically they have this driver privacy act that says that they can't use any kind of the flock camera readers and stuff like that. Which listen, I don't like the whole flock thing because I don't like to be tracked. But if I get my car stolen and I call in a police report, I want them to use whatever tools they have to find the car. You know what I'm saying? So it's kind of one of those give and take things. Well, I have nothing to hide. I mean, I'm just going about my business. Yeah, until your business becomes antithetical to the state's priorities, right? And you're getting tracked. So, you know, the jury's out on whether we really like this camera tracking and stuff like that. If they actually honored our constitutional protections, like no warrant, search and seizure and stuff like that. Right, no problem. I wouldn't have a problem. But the legislature passed this act that basically says um, among the provisions, the law prohibits the use of license plate readers in proximity to community locations, parks, stuff like that, where, you know, illegal immigrants might be hanging out, including hospitals, schools, and other protected areas. Violations of these restrictions carry significant legal consequences, including classification as a gross individual misdemeanor for individual officers. Okay, gross misdemeanor can carry some prison time. So he says, after some assessment, there's just absolutely no way that we can comply with this with the way flock cameras are set up. There's too many of these community centers everywhere, and you know, the risk to the officers is way too high because they don't have qualified immunity here. They'd get charged individually for looking at the camera license plate.

SPEAKER_17 1:44:51

These are like spot sanctuary zones.

SPEAKER_10 1:44:53

Yes. So Keith Swank informs the community this decision was not made lightly. The loss of this tool is a significant setback for public safety in our community. ALPR technology has been an instrumental in locating missing persons, including silver alert cases, identifying stolen vehicles, and apprehending dangerous offenders. Without it, our ability to respond quickly and effectively is dismineted, diminished. So they they have ended the use of them in Pierce County. So you want to go do something crazy, go do it in Pierce County because they can't they ain't tracking you nowhere. That's actually really and I imagine other sheriff's departments are probably gonna follow suit because the the risk to the individual officers is way too high. Maybe King County will try to like thread the needle because the courts will protect them, but they're of course are gonna turn off cameras around schools and stuff like that.

SPEAKER_17 1:45:40

King I imagine King County will probably create a whole new separate division of officers that are like somehow immune from whatever, but they're just you know assigned to the cameras or whatever.

Debt Based Dollar And Exiting The System

SPEAKER_10 1:45:52

Yeah, they'll do whatever they want. Now, this clip I was thinking about playing earlier, thinking about playing later. We talked about a changing financial system. Let me tell you one thing that's not going to change the dollar. The dollar is a debt-based system that all comes from the Federal Reserve. So this is Jerome Powell. He's talking at some conference here and he's talking about the national debt. And I've said this so many times, I don't even know everybody I've told it to. But I would rail on this topic, even in prison, with some of my friends that were uh conservative, that liked guys like Chip Roy and Thomas Mass, you know, the debt hawks that run around with the debt calculator on their lapel. And it's like you're never gonna pay off the national debt. It literally cannot be paid off. It can't be paid off. It it can't. Like all the people, well, what if we just threw$37 trillion at it and paid it off? Then tomorrow you'd be in debt again because the issuance of the dollar itself is debt. So you can't be there. So if there's one thing that's guaranteed, it's that your dollar is going to be worth less tomorrow than it is today.

SPEAKER_17 1:46:54

Every day.

SPEAKER_10 1:46:55

Every day, period. And Jerome Powell totally confirms this.

SPEAKER_02 1:46:59

Um, I don't think we know uh what that number is, or sort of ratio of debt to GDP, where it would be a problem. There are, of course, Japan being a great example, there are countries that have much higher um levels of sovereign debt to their GDP than we do.

SPEAKER_10 1:47:15

What's when they say sovereign debt, the whole country is in a hock to a central bank. Okay, which means you, the taxpayers, have to pay the interest on that. Because how else are they going to get the money? The whole country is in debt to their currency itself.

SPEAKER_02 1:47:29

Circular firing squad. Clear is that our uh debt is growing much faster. The federal government debt is growing substantially faster than our economy, and that ratio is going up, and you know, in the long run, that's kind of the definition of unsustainable. The level of the debt is not unsustainable, but the path is not sustainable. And so it's it's really important that we get back to we don't have to pay the debt down, we just need to have uh you know primary balance and and begin to have the economy actually growing better, growing uh more quickly than the economy. It will it will not end well if we don't do something fairly soon. This is not the Fed's job, of course, and I pretty much limit myself to those high-level points, which which uh essentially everyone ignores.

SPEAKER_10 1:48:18

Well, how would you get the economy to grow? Lower the interest rate is the guy keeping the interest rate not being lowered. Oh, but if you could just juice the economy somehow, and how would you do that in a regulatory environment? You know, go back to the beginning of the show where the playbook is pretty much set.

SPEAKER_23 1:48:38

Uh I don't know.

SPEAKER_10 1:48:40

I'm the fugged the debt's never going to be paid off. You've got to get out of the system, which is why I went to the cryptocurrency conference this weekend. It's why we do what we do over at 1776live.us. You've got to take sovereignty for yourself. We peasants, listen, we operate under the motto often wrong, never in doubt, right? I'm not an expert. I've been a mortgage broker, I've been a real estate agent, I've been a contractor, I've I got my insurance license for a period of time. I know how the system works. I understand how money's created with loan applications. I understand the first cut. I used to, one of the things I loved when I got into the construction industry was it was like, I'm the first one getting paid. You know, after the broker and the and the the uh mortgage broker takes his cut and the title company takes their cut and the realtor takes their cut, and here I am pouring a foundation. I'm the first stop for that dollar in the real economy of Adams, right? Like there's a there was an exchange there, but that money was new.

SPEAKER_17 1:49:36

Well, you were the first one that you were the first one to add value to the equation, to the equation, yes.

SPEAKER_10 1:49:41

And it was very cognizant, that was very real. Okay, things have to change. Okay, so as peasants, we might not know all the answer. We can throw mud all we want. I'm not the expert, I'm not supposed to know any of this stuff, right?

SPEAKER_17 1:49:55

So listen, we can be wrong, but we but you do know that if this Guy Jerome Powell lowered the rate, things would happen.

SPEAKER_10 1:50:03

The building market would open up, and we'd add some assets to the balance sheet of the United States.

SPEAKER_17 1:50:10

But we're not the smartest guys.

Beware Experts With Fake Authority

SPEAKER_10 1:50:12

Yeah, we're not the smartest guys, but he just focuses on the high-level stuff. Right. And lower the freaking rate, bro. Obviously, the Fed, who is represented by the wealthy central, you know, big big five banks and the wealthy families that funded the Fed, they have an interest in keeping the gravy train flowing. He's billions of dollars over budget on a small remodel. These guys are money launderers. And of course, this Iran thing, the off-balance books, it all ties in together. Yep. We're not experts. We don't present ourselves as experts. This is the peasant's perspective. Okay. I don't hold myself up on any particular pedestal. In college, when I was getting a political science degree with a religious under minor, right? I had a professor who taught in both departments. He said, you know, the unfortunate thing about you is you can never be an expert because the one thing everybody is entitled to is an opinion on politics and religion. Okay. So listen, I'm just a guy that's walked life. Ron, you're just a guy that's walked through life. We don't, we're not particular experts. We don't hold ourselves out as professors. We might have some expertise in a thing or two, but I'm humble enough to know that I don't have all the answers, but I read a lot. I try to get as much information as I can. There's a guy that shows up a lot on viral videos, and he's doing assessments. It's this Chinese guy, Professor Zhang. Okay. Now, Professor Professor Shang has presented himself as this political scientist and you know, this university professor. He's got this YouTube channel called Professor Chang. Okay. And he was confronted by Medi His San. Is that his name here? Uh yeah, Medi Hassan. And he exposed him as a fraud. Now, as this happened, and we've played some of his clips before.

SPEAKER_17 1:51:57

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:51:58

So I was like, oh, I didn't realize I had to deep dive on this guy. He's kind of a construct, right? He talks about wanting to create his own cult, and there's kind of like you get back into his library of stuff, and it's it's a little weird.

SPEAKER_17 1:52:09

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:52:10

But one of the one of the things that can't, and a lot of wrong predictions, like Nikki Haley will be the vice president, and it kind of goes on. He's got a lot of wrong predictions.

SPEAKER_17 1:52:18

I think at one point I actually thought that he was AI.

SPEAKER_10 1:52:21

Yeah. So he was on and he was being confronted about this fact that you're not a professor or an expert at all.

SPEAKER_11 1:52:27

You're an English lit graduate, and you're not a professor. I know it's no YouTube, Monica, but you're a high school teacher. You're not actually a professor. Right.

SPEAKER_16 1:52:35

Um, yeah. And I'm not a professor. I'm not a professor. But but I never said I was professor. It's the internet who called me. Hold on, hold on. Hi, YouTube. This is Professor Jiang. Hi, YouTube. Uh that's Professor Jiang here. Professor Jiang here. Professor Jiang here. Professor Jiang here. Professor Jiang here. That's not what I say. That's what they say. I don't call myself.

SPEAKER_11 1:53:00

Look, look, there's a guy on the egg who calls who calls himself the god. I'm good friends with uh radio host called Charlemagne the God, but no one actually thinks he's a god. People actually think you're a professor. Professor Jiang here. You're an English lit graduate, and you're not a professor. I know it's your YouTube moniker, but you're a high school teacher. You're not actually a professor. So funny.

SPEAKER_10 1:53:22

Anyways, so we're writing him off. He's got all kinds of opinions on the Iran war and all the writing him off. Right now, he's probably smart, probably put a lot of stuff together, but clearly he's pushing an agenda.

SPEAKER_17 1:53:33

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:53:33

Right. And and that's one of the things. Listen.

SPEAKER_17 1:53:37

And there's gonna be a lot of people just like him in your life very soon. There's gonna be a lot of people coming out there claiming to have authority and claiming to know a bunch of stuff. You just gotta be careful.

SPEAKER_10 1:53:48

Yeah. I'm I'm an empower you kind of person. Yes. Okay. I'm an empower you. I just want to. This is my opinion. This is what I see. This is my perspective. I'm just a peasant, just like you. Okay. So see with your eyes and make your own judgment. Don't trust the experts. If there's one thing that I'm trying to do, is don't trust these guys with titles and tiara. Learn for yourself. The objective of this show is just to put the information out there, kind of build the narrative so you can see how the world is working around you.

Self Reliance And Creating Value

SPEAKER_17 1:54:21

And we don't want you to test all the assumptions that you built your entire life on because it could be, you know, kind of discombobulating, but you know, you might want to examine some of the assumptions that you based your life on. Exactly.

SPEAKER_10 1:54:33

And it and it, you know, it stems from financial things and all, you know, I had an experience this last week because uh I haven't had a job since college. Okay. I haven't had a W-2 job since college. I've been an entrepreneur my whole adult life. And it's it's been a changing environment, right? Mortgages to flipping houses to uh real estate agent to uh contractor to insurance agent. I didn't actually work as an insurance agent. I got my license and then was too busy with your family's construction company to do anything with it. But my intention there was to be a business owner, and I ended up being a septic installer, right? Like physically doing it. So for me, but I've always shook the bushes, made my own living, charted my own court, went to prison, came out, had to start over from scratch, right? Uh kind of with connection with my partners of 1776 Live. Shout out to Lisa, and a great community over there was kind of able to rebuild over there as well. And we have what's called the Epic Trust, which is a way for people to get some exposure to real estate and take advantage of my expertise in real estate. And we're in the middle of a property project, and I don't really talk about it on here. But Lisa said something to me as we were as I was talking about this deal, and she's like, You did this like from start to finish, you created all of this and and did it. It's like, yes, and everybody can do it. There's no limiting factor to what you can do other than you, right? Now you might have certain skill sets, go find people like Lisa fills in the gaps that I have. I don't like minutia, right? I don't like the little uh tiny stuff because I get real micromanagey on it. So it's like, hey, I want to focus on big picture and push a certain direction. So I need people to come in. There's a place for you, right? But go trade your value, go find the thing you're good at and find where you fit in and make chart your own course. That's my hope for the peasants. When you become self-reliant, when you become self-governing, you don't have to worry about what the government's doing, other than just the fact that you got to adapt, right? If if if the price of eggs and milk are going up, then figure out a way to get more money. Well, how do you do that, Taylor? I have a job. Okay, quit your job. What do you mean? Well, sometimes you got to take a step back so that you can reorient and go a few steps forward. Do things differently. You know, as peasants, we have to live here, we have to survive. I don't have a choice. I have a family, I have obligations, I have moral obligations that require me to feed them and house them. And you know what I'm saying? On top of that, I want to pursue my happiness, which means I don't want to build other people's dreams, I want to build mine, and I just want other people to do the same.

SPEAKER_17 1:57:18

This is gonna sound weird, but I'm gonna say you are the creation. You know, when you understand that you were created by God to be a creator, you'll understand that as you create, you have that power in you. You can create these things, just like Taylor's talking about. You created this this uh transaction. You can do it. You can make you can make whatever you want in your life, whatever you can dream up, you can do it.

SPEAKER_10 1:57:42

You can do it. There is a way for you. It's the consider the lives of the field, how they how they grow and they're adorned greater than Solomon and all his temples, and they they don't sweat the small stuff, you know. And that's the thing. You can do it if you take the power to yourself to do it.

SPEAKER_17 1:57:57

Be the source. We'll be the same. Be the source.

SPEAKER_10 1:57:59

Yes, be the source. Turn lemon into lemonades, as they say, right? All right, guys, that wraps up our show today. Thank you so much. I'm glad to be back from Vegas. It was a good trip. I'm sure you guys will hear more about it as time goes on, but we'll talk to you guys again tomorrow. No private today, end of the month. We met our five hours of streaming. We'll start over again tomorrow. Bye.

Monty Python Peasants Finale

SPEAKER_04 1:58:40

Old woman, man, ma'am, sonny. What knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37, I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you look what subjective automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh, king, eh? Very nice. And how'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress. How'd you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of British. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. No, we have a king. I thought we're an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes. How dare you go? Bringing class into the game. That's what it's all about. If only people would these good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_14 2:00:05

Yes.

SPEAKER_04 2:00:06

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see. By a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quacked. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of being quack. I order you to be quacked. I'm your king. Or didn't vote for you? You don't vote for kings? Why do you become king then? The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet! But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tarp threw a sword at you. Shut up! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bink had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up, will you? Shut up! Now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up! Have we seen the violence inherent in the system? Help, help! I'm being repressed, bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?