Common Sense Wins When You Enforce The Law

Seattle’s housing market doesn’t move in a vacuum and neither does politics. We start with a staggering inventory spike and use it as a doorway into a bigger question: what happens to a city when layoffs, affordability, and outbound migration all hit at once, and when policy choices make stability harder than leaving? We talk through why “more listings” can be great news for buyers while still being a warning sign for the local economy.

Then we jump to the kind of “common sense” message that’s going viral in Los Angeles: enforce the law. We connect homelessness, public drug use, tenant rules, legal aid, and the everyday incentives that decide whether people invest in a community or stop trying. From there, we widen the lens to energy dominance, the Strait of Hormuz, gas prices, and how projects like Keystone XL become political footballs with real cost-of-living consequences.

Finally, we tie the threads together: election integrity, ballot harvesting, mail-in voting, border incentives, and why protest funding and NGO networks matter. The episode closes with a blunt claim about power, fiat currency, and why Bitcoin keeps coming up as a counterweight to systems that thrive on printing, spending, and buying compliance. If you care about redistricting, gerrymandering, voter ID, and how money and elections shape policy outcomes, this one is packed.

Subscribe for more, share this with a friend who argues politics with you, and leave a review with the single topic you want us to dig into next.

Transcript

Cold Open And Welcome Peasants

SPEAKER_07 0:31

It's the little guys. It's the little guys that take the everything. It's peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Perspective. And Pony Boy is sharp on the minute. Good morning. Welcome, welcome. You are back on top, Pony Boy. You've you've got some run for your money on being the first ever. A lot of people trying to dethrone you. John Attack is especially last week. He was he was a couple times in the week, he was the first. So good morning. Glad you made it. And it looks like we'll give everybody just a few minutes to pile in. I know it's Monday morning. People aren't used to getting back into the routine. Ron, you were good this morning. Showed up bright and early. Got my blue lights. They're kind of fun. Oh, we had a good episode with Gary on Saturday. Watch for that to drop on take backyourcounty.com or just take back your county, the podcast. You can find it as a rumble channel associated with Peasants Perspective. You can also find it on all of your apps. So all of your podcast players, it should be up. There aren't any episodes loaded, but watch for one this week. We got to tinker around just a little bit with it. We pre-recorded it. So, anyways, glad to have you guys. And I know why Pony Boy showed up bright and early this morning. The one and only right now, he showed up for the simultaneous sip. And all you need out of it for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, or stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. This morning, I have a can of iced coffee caramel macchiato. Delicious. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like this cup macchiato. I've already been sipping on a little bit this morning. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better: the simultaneous sip. And it starts right now.

SPEAKER_02 2:41

It's not lost on me that the Democrats just want votes from anybody they can get it from. And they don't mind letting some illegals vote either. And that's inexcusable.

SPEAKER_14 2:49

That is so true, isn't it?

Seattle Housing Inventory Shock

SPEAKER_07 2:50

They don't mind letting a couple of illegals vote. That's inexcusable. Man, lots of good things happened last week on the for on the election front. That's pretty exciting. Stick around for private today. We're going to be talking about the redistricting battle. It's a big deal. Totally reset the stage and has the Democrats completely on their back foot. If you like watching Democrats and socialist communists squirm a little bit, that was a good week for us. Kind of reset the chessboard a little bit. The level of cheat they're going to need to win at this point is off the charts. So John Attackis joined us. Good morning for Razure. It's a great morning in Boise, Idaho. Oh, I bet it is. My kids this week all want to move. Every single one of them, top to bottom. They all want out. They're like, let's go, let's leave. I'm like, well, what if we just get a second house in Florida? I'm thinking like a small house in Cape Corral with a pool, you know, something nice. Anyways. So speaking of real estate, we've got something interesting happening in Seattle. And this is localized to Seattle, King County, specifically the Seattle proper. So Seattle city limits. So Seattle's housing market is going through a historic inventory shock. There are now 8,630 listings across the Seattle metro area. Oh, it says metro area. I thought it was Seattle proper. This is generally uh King County.

SPEAKER_14 4:08

Okay.

Legal Aid And Tenant Power

SPEAKER_07 4:08

As of April 2026, in a normal April, there are about 4,600 listings. There are 8,630 listings, meaning inventory today is 88% above normal. This is happening due to layoffs, a historic lack of affordability, and increased outbound migration. Like I said, my family's ready to roll. Ultimately, good news for local Seattle buyers for the first time in a decade. You have control over this market. Expect expect prices to fall in the next year, potentially a lot in certain zip codes. And here's the chart here. Back in 2019, when we were kind of uh we didn't have a housing crisis necessarily, but we did have some affordability for just a brief moment. 5,938. And here we are starting in 2024. Woo! It has gone up and up and up. What I look at this is is this is the war on Trump. This is the TDS infection that has infected Olympia and King County Council and King County City City Office is affecting this. Conservatives are bailing out of the state in record numbers. And our new tax on millionaires thing doesn't help any at all. And the thing about Seattle and Washington State in general is we have some really socialist policies. Here's Patty Murray. She's talking about legal aid help. So apparently, the federal government gives a bunch of money to Washington State to give to low-income people to fight their legal battles. It's legal aid. This goes for it's it's anytime you have a criminal charge against you, you're entitled to a public defender. It's at the cost of the state, right? It's the whole you you have a you have you have to have a fair shot. So, you know, we're gonna give you an attorney, no matter how bad they might be. They just got out of dental school. They just got out of dental school and I passed the bar. But now we also have this going on with civil stuff. Apparently, it's been going on for a long time. One of the things I've noted about Washington State is it's a extremely tenant-friendly state. It is hard to evict someone here, unlike Texas, where I'm pretty sure it's written into state law that the landlord can show up with a revolver and evict you himself.

SPEAKER_14 6:16

Yeah, I think we had landlords in this state that lost their properties eventually over people that just camped out and they couldn't get rid of them.

SPEAKER_07 6:24

We have some serious squatter problems and things like that. And a lot of it ties back to this it's the free legal aid for these civil things, including tenant issues.

SPEAKER_12 6:33

The core principle in our country is equal justice under the law. But if you can't afford help, you don't give that equal justice. President Trump wanted to zero out all money for legal aid. I said no last year and reinstated some of that money. I say no again this year. I'm here today talking to people impacted by this. I'm gonna go back to Washington, D.C. I'm gonna tear up that budget and fight to make sure people have equal justice under the law and legal aid is protected.

Spencer Pratt And Common Sense LA

SPEAKER_07 7:02

Oh, great. More social services in order to sue people. Wonderful. It's just amazing. You know who's really making a lot of waves on the local scene is this gentleman down in LA that's running for mayor. His name is Spencer Pratt. And if Spencer Pratt, from everything I can tell, is your classic uh California hopes and dreams guys, right? At some point, he tried to have himself a career in reality TV. His wife tried to be a singer. I mean, this is like classic. I moved to LA to try to make it big thing going on, which is fixed, which is cool. I mean, that's the whole point of California, right? Like, you know, one of the things I've noticed over the years as I've traveled across the country, if you go like, you know, involved in sales and real estate and stuff like that, if you go to the Midwest, it's like, prove it, show me. It's it's like money doesn't grow on trees, young man. You know, that kind of an attitude. You go to California, it's like, you mean I can buy a lottery ticket and get rich? Yeah, man. You mean I can go into like one uh commercial audition and get on a TV show? Yeah, man. It's like fast money, everybody wants to get rich, highly money motivated. But it's like the lottery. It is like the lottery.

SPEAKER_14 8:16

I mean, if you've ever seen somebody who got a spot on a commercial or on a show or something, when they find out that they got the spot, oh my gosh, it's like somebody won NASCAR or something.

SPEAKER_07 8:31

So we're like, they're so excited. It's hilarious to me because I I knew a lady years and years ago. This has been 10 plus years ago, and she was from LA, Hollywood area, and she was a pharmacist. Oh no. Okay, she was a pharmacist, she was a doctor, and as a doctor in LA, she made like 180 grand, which there is like, you know, just above minimum survival.

SPEAKER_14 8:58

Scraping by.

SPEAKER_07 8:59

So she was going out and she was going to auditions to be in commercials, and she was in a bunch of commercials, but they were uh public service announcements like don't smoke on the bus commercials, and you know, like like pull the string to be at the next stop. Right, the more you know. Doo doo doo. Yes, like it, like it was public service announcement commercials, but she would be sometimes an extra and things like that. But she was trying to make it into the movie industry because the pay is better, anyways. She did that for like 10 years and then moved up to Washington, where that$180,000 went a little farther. So this is Spencer Pratt, and he's being interviewed by Axion, and this is on the this is uh all-in podcast uh people, or it's all in, and he's talking about what his policies will be if he's elected mayor. Now remember, he's kind of got the buzz. He's addressing all the little issues that Californians, specifically people in LA, want to deal with. They want to deal with homelessness, they want to deal with crap on the road. Some of his commercials are the best. Like there's one that's like, you know, a month in after Spencer Pratt is elected mayor and this lady's walking down the streets. Like, now I know when I step on sh on the sidewalk, it's dog sh not human shit. And then there's another one where it's like a firefighter who's like, turns out it's easy to fight fires when the reservoirs that we get water from are full. Like all these like completely common sense things. So here's it him on the podcast basically telling people what his policies are gonna be. Tell me if this isn't appealing to the average LA resident.

SPEAKER_02 10:30

First three weeks, signs up across the city, no more nakedness, no more drug use, no more robbing, no what's it more bullying dogs in the street, no more dog abuse very on every sign, on every part. So that and we're gonna go around, we're gonna warn everybody hey, got three more weeks of this, like clock's ticking, just keep telling everyone, just so the people that are aware, they're like, oh wow, there's a new mayor in town, they may start leaving. And then when the three weeks, or maybe we'll even do two weeks, maybe people will want it faster. And then once we start enforcing the laws, boom, streets will be back. You know who also I'm gonna bring in the CDC, because there's medieval diseases in these encampments. They're not swabbing these encampments, they're not swabbing the streets. People are just living in feces and drug use and dogs burning and body. We need these streets cleaned. Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 11:25

Sounds like a plan to me. All we're gonna do is start enforcing our laws. Now, CNN had a little debate over this, and there was kind of a meltdown here because an LA resident is like, eh, there's no plan. That to me sounds like a plan. Enforce the laws, right? Yeah, it's just pretty simple.

SPEAKER_14 11:45

Brilliant plan.

SPEAKER_07 11:46

Enforce the laws. And apparently, Spencer Pratt is speaking to your average millennial, like the people in LA that want to make it. I did a wealth assessment that we do over at 1776 Live when you attend an Ignite presentation. We'll do a wealth assessment. We'll meet with you one-on-one, talk about your situation, see if you're a fit for the community. And I was meeting with this young lady, she's from LA. I was like, so why are you living in LA? And she's she's doing really well for herself at her age, again, early 20s, like same age as my daughter. And she's making about 80 grand a year, which sounds good. In LA, though, yeah, she can't even afford an apartment. It's it's tough stuff. And I was like, Why do you why are you staying in LA? Like, you're so young, move to Kansas City. Like, go somewhere where there's hope. And uh, she's like, I really like the grocery stores. She named the grocery store. I can't remember the name, but apparently it's like some hoity-toity grocery store. I'm like, well, there's a quarter of your budget right there. So, anyways, a lot of people do want to live in California, and so they're attracted to someone who's gonna come in and clean up the streets.

SPEAKER_38 12:49

I mean, his odds are going up. We'll see. This is a really uphill battle for him, but I think Republicans should be taking copious notes because he's literally, you just gotta embrace common sense and be normal. And he is calling out the fact that leftists in LA seem to be fine with letting people, you know, shoot up in front of schools. They're fine with dogs getting injected with fentanyl. They're doing nothing. And he's calling out some very obvious things that the vast majority of Americans can agree on. And he's going viral because of it. People want common sense.

SPEAKER_25 13:24

Is this common sense for real? Like as an LA voter, as someone that will vote for mayor in Los Angeles, I'm telling you, this is the opposite of common sense. This is so embarrassing. I am so exhausted of being surrounded by this level of idiocy. It is not, this guy is not practical. His man's plan was to live up his reality fame. When that dwindled, he wanted to be an influencer. When that dwindled, he tried to make his wife a singer. It didn't work. So now he's gonna be mayor of LA. He says he's gonna end corruption. How? He says he's gonna have no more homeless. How? He says he's gonna have renters' rights, how? I'm so sick of having politicians come in here with zero experience telling us they're gonna fix everything. Have we learned nothing? Let me just play.

SPEAKER_16 14:04

It's embarrassing what his retort to you would be or something.

SPEAKER_07 14:08

Well, I mean, we do have a mayor that has been classically trained in socialism and communism down in Cuba, right? Mayor Karen Bass. Perfect fit. Yeah, perfect fit. I mean, she has a plan, take from the rich, give to the bureaucrats, and let the poor suffer. I mean, clearly, like total common sense. It makes perfect sense every time you look at it. That if that's the attitude. Why would she be so mad and unhinged? Because Spencer Pratt makes sense. Uh huh. You know, you want to you want to piss off a communist, put put a mirror on their face, show them what they're doing and how it doesn't work. It's like the dumbest thing I've ever seen. Uh you this is something that Gary mentioned in the episode we recorded on Saturday, which take your country, take back your county. You can follow the channel. Please do if you subscribe to this channel already. Uh, just go look at our page and look at channels. You'll see Take Back Your Country, Take Back Your County, excuse me. And on any podcast player, you can find it as well. There's no episodes up yet, but go ahead and subscribe, turn on your notifications so you get them when they come on. But the socialists and the communists, they always think their program will work. And when it doesn't work, then they have this go-to excuse all the time that hey, it just wasn't done right, or hey, you know, if we just did it this way, it would work this time. Oh, we just need a new committee or a new plan. It will never ever work. It's just it's one of those things that uh you you can't really you can't really get around. Here's an example here, right?

SPEAKER_14 15:48

Socialists, they they're the thing that I keep getting it distilled down to is they keep thinking that it it'll work if we can get everybody to force into it.

Why Socialist Cities Keep Failing

SPEAKER_07 15:58

And they're never accountable for their bad ideas. They can always blame it off on someone else. Someone with a business background, the buck stops there, right? If if you have a bad CEO, he makes bad decisions. If you're the Bud Light marketing person, you hire Dylan Mulvaney to push Bud Light to a bunch of brat boys. It's your fault. It's your fault. You get fired, you have to you have to change your marketing ad. Next thing you know, it's American flags and Clydesdales everywhere. You know what I mean? Like you got you got a course correct. But when you're a socialist and a lot of socialists, they come out of academia and they really do have a mental illness, they have a hero complex. Here's a really good breakdown of what happens in these cities where we have socialists that run the place. And socialists today go by the name Democrat. And I apologize for those of you that may or may not be listening to this show, probably not a lot of you, that are Democrats that are like, this isn't what I thought it was. And listen, I sympathize. I was a conservative Democrat. I came out of college, I have a political science degree, my family all thought I was nuts because I was liberal. Really, I was a classical liberal, right? But you say the word liberal to a mature person and they're like, well, that's a problem because they have life experience, right? In college, they get you to buy in on Jeffersonian liberalism and then they loop you in to socialism as if it's one thing. They shouldn't be one thing, although today the labor liberal is just a dog whistle to socialism and it is a mental illness.

SPEAKER_36 17:24

Have you ever wondered why so many intellectuals and academics are often left-leaning and drawn to socialism? Well, it has to do with a hero complex. There's an economist by the name of Joseph Schumpeter, and explained this really well in one of his books, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. He explained that highly developed industrialized capitalist societies create enough abundance to produce a large quantity of this intellectual class. And these people are like journalists, college professors, lawyers, political theorists, academics, and they're often very resentful of capitalism. And this resentment usually stems from the fact that capitalism mostly rewards entrepreneurs, inventors, merchants, and businessmen, people who actually produce real goods and services for society. It doesn't do much to reward these intellectuals because most of them don't produce anything. Their products are usually ideas, critiques, and theories about society and how it should function. And because they don't actually solve any real problems, their easiest path to influence for them is by criticizing capitalism. Think of people like Michel Foucault, Noam Chomsky, Herbert Makuzo, and most notably Karl Marx. And because they believe that they're actually smarter than most people, they often feel that capitalism doesn't properly reward them for their intellect. But under socialism, it will be different because they'll be more valuable. So it gives them the starting role that they don't have in a market economy. And on top of that, they also don't suffer the consequences of their own failed ideologies. You see, unlike an engineer who's built a bad product, you can see it in real time if that product works or not. And if it doesn't, then you have to go back and try to fix it. But for these intellectuals, their product is their ideas, so they can be catastrophically wrong and then still get to keep their careers. And if their ideologies and predictions fail, they can always write a new essay explaining why it wasn't real socialism or that somebody implemented it wrong. So because they have no skin in the game, there's no limit to what they can come up with.

SPEAKER_07 19:41

And that describes it perfectly. And that's why you see these cities that are full of educated people. One thing about California, a lot of education, a lot of abundance, a lot of success. Same thing here in Washington State, same thing in Oregon, same thing in the Northeast, New York, et cetera, et cetera. Right? A lot of abundance. So you have this class of people who can grift off that abundance, university professors, bureaucrats, think takers, lobbyists, etc., etc. And they get this hero complex, like I know better because I've got more education than the pipe fitter or the plumber or the electrician. And you can see this. Just look at the way these people talk about those people. Like they're just a cog in society that doesn't know anything. Does that make sense? And so when their plans don't work, when the streets are full of crap in San Francisco and LA, when you have medieval viruses in homeless encampments, why do we even have homeless encampments? Why do we have drug use? Oh, it's because they're unhoused. Okay, well, let's give them houses. And then we find out they're using drugs in the houses that we provide for them, right? Um a couple weeks back, we played the little, it wasn't really undercover video, but independent journalism that went into one of the homeless encampments in Seattle, and they've got a tiny house village that's nearby. And you look inside these tiny houses, it's literally like a folding chair and needles. Okay. And how much did that tiny house cost? Well, about 200 grand. Because you know, by the time you paid the bureaucrat and all these other people to implement this idea, what do we get? We get institutionalized drug shelters. It's insanity. If you keep doing the same thing you've always done, that is normally defined as the definition of insanity, but it's also conservatism, where we don't realize what we're up against, right? These people will morph and morph and change every time to try to get power. They'll say conservatives don't have a plan. You know what? You know what Spencer Pratt's plan is in LA? Enforce the law. Yeah. That's it. There are laws on the books to deal with all of this.

SPEAKER_14 21:46

If I was to somehow get into office up here in Washington, that would be my plan too. You know, enforce the law.

SPEAKER_07 21:52

Enforce the law. Yeah, exactly. Enforce the law. Uh, John Atis already said hi to you. Good pray the Rosary Daily. Good morning. Carlitz, you made it morning. Glad you're here. Carlito and Tiffany. Good morning, y'all. Over on YouTube. Pray the Rosary Daily. Really bad laws against homeowners in California. Squatting is a tenant strategy. It really is. You know, you can pretty much stay in your house longer as a squatter than as a as a renter that has defaulted on his rent. So may as well not pay the first month's rent. I think there might be YouTube channels out there. I want to ask you what the Go ahead.

SPEAKER_14 22:22

There might be YouTube out there. I think there might be YouTube channels out there that teach people how to squat that are more popular than our show.

SPEAKER_07 22:28

Oh yeah. Oh yeah. In fact, we played a clip of one of these a while back that was talking about basically how he got like three years of free rent by using free legal aid and all these other tactics. Oh my goodness. Oh my goodness. I remember when I was really heavy into real estate at the auctions, you know, a lot of people would come in there with this idea like the path to success is rentals. Right. Not in Washington State. No. And first of all, our values are too high. You can't rent for what the how you know what would make sense ROI-wise on the deal. Instantly underwater. Yeah, instantly underwater.

SPEAKER_14 23:04

But also And probably have to hire yourself a legal team to protect yourself from the state.

Hormuz Blockade And US Energy Exports

SPEAKER_07 23:09

That's what it was. It was like you couldn't defend yourself against tenants. Better off just putting it on the market. There are buyers out there. You know, why why not just sell the house? Yeah. Mariasel says, Mom's here. Oh, so glad you made it, Mom. Isn't that great? My mom and dad tune in every day for the show. It's like our biggest fans next to Carlito and Pony Boy and Pray the Rosary Daily and all the rest of you guys that show up bright and early, 6:30 a.m. Monday through Friday, Pacific time. Okay. Over in Tehran, obviously, we still have an issue with the straight-of-for moots. Now, to the doomers out there, they're like, Trump's dragging us into an endless war. It might be an endless blockade at this point, right? Which does affect the world economy for sure. But we're not putting boots on the ground yet at this point. Although Trump does reserve the right, you know, at this stage. But one of the things that has been coming up is the price of gasoline and the price of oil. Now, I I can't say that oil companies are to some in some way, shape, or form engaged in gouging.

SPEAKER_14 24:12

No, they are.

SPEAKER_07 24:13

Yeah, definitely. But but you have to also consider the fact that even with the price of oil right now elevated, it's at what has been the average over the Obama and Biden terms. Yeah. So we hold Trump to a certain standard that we have to lower oil prices, but we don't hold the Democrat socialists to that same concern. Why? Oh, because the intellectual class is pushing environmental causes and don't you want to save the environment? I mean, at this point, Trump should just come out and say, like, look, high prices are good because there's less smog. Why aren't you guys happy? You know, why not? Why not take what they've been shoving down our throats for decades and turn around and use it against them? Look, all these ships coming out of the Hermoots, look, they're not polluting anymore. Those are all run on crude oil. You know, they could do whatever they wanted. Mark and 967 says, good morning from Wisconsin. Welcome. And I hear out in Wisconsin, you guys got the cows on the on the field in pasture. So that's kind of fun. We got little cheeseburgers up in Michigan. We got some hamburgers up in Wisconsin. I love our, I love our peasants. They really are peasants. A lot of you guys are just salt of the earth. So here's Lee Zeldon on Fox News talking a little bit about the straits of Hormouth and the blockade there, but also talking about the fact that the United States has increased its oil production. So when this is over, there will be an end at some point. We are going to reap the rewards big time.

SPEAKER_23 25:37

Administrator, I want to ask you what the question that so many Americans have at home right now, because they hear the president say once this is all over, gas prices are going to go down. In fact, we might even be in a better position because we're going to be maybe the world's looking to us for more oil production, and maybe we'll finally resolve this issue with Middle Eastern oil once and for all. What can they look forward to, not only later this summer, but heading into the fall, the winter? What do you project for those Americans who are a little concerned right now when they fill up?

SPEAKER_05 26:12

I would point to a recent trip that I've made to Tokyo, the White House National Energy Dominance Councils with Secretary Berger and other leaders of the Trump administration. And it was a meeting amongst 17 leaders of the Indo-Pacific nations, a lot of U.S. companies, and the energy ministers from a lot of these other countries. They are seeing what is happening in the Middle East, and they desire to diversify their energy sources like never before. You take a country like Japan, where it takes them 28 days to get their supply from the Middle East, and they haven't had freedom of navigation, and then they look to the United States where they have been getting uh supplies for a very long time. It only takes eight days to get to Japan, and there's always been total freedom of navigation. A lot of these countries, if you want to start talking midterm, long-term. So this is really interesting here.

SPEAKER_07 27:06

Obviously, the Strait of Hormouts has traditionally supplied about 20% of the world's oil, but it's not a safe neighborhood, right? It's not a safe neighborhood. Don't send your nicest boats over there. There's literally Somali pyots in the Indian Ocean as you come out of the Strait of Hormouts, you've got Iranian thugs in the Strait of Hormoots, you have a lot of back channeling stuff, and it takes ultimately 28 days to get the oil out of the Strait of Hormouts. But if you're a Japanese company or an Indonesian company or a South Korean company that established a trade route there long ago when they were pumping 50% of the oil supply, you didn't get it from the United States because there wasn't a supply to get, right? We were supplying the Western hemisphere and our domestic needs. But over Trump's two terms now, he has increased domestic oil production to the point to where we are a net exporter of oil. We crossed that threshold, by the way, for the first time in like 60 years, right? When in Trump's first term. Do you remember that? All of a sudden, hey, we're a net exporter of energy. We're not getting our oil out of the Middle East. So if OPEC wants to burn us, it won't affect us nearly as badly. Like we will never have gas lines again. We have supply, right? That was the thing. In the 1970s, we had gas lines because we didn't have enough product to sell. That's what led the pricing to go up.

SPEAKER_14 28:28

Prior to this time, that was a real threat problem.

SPEAKER_07 28:31

That was a real threat problem. So now with this disruption in Hormouts, he's got talking about these 27 Asian countries are like, hey, you know, now that the supply line's broken, we can get it from the US. They've got the supply to sell. We can redo that trade. It's actually a shorter distance. Everybody's saying that. They're all like, we got options. We got options. We got options. So when this when this uh what do you blockade lifts and the Strait of Hormuz eventually opens up, a lot of these buyers of oil aren't gonna go back.

Keystone XL And Policy Whiplash

SPEAKER_05 29:06

Right? They're not gonna go back. Yeah. Vision into the future. Uh, this is going to be a very good thing. Unleashing energy dominance is not just about ramping up a domestic supply here at home for Americans, uh, but also being in a stronger position to be able to export to these other countries that want it.

SPEAKER_31 29:22

Uh, you know, on that topic, uh, we we, you know, we have seen this litigated in multiple administrations, the Keystone XL pipeline. Um, and EPA was often, you know, the environmental hazards was often the justification, and usually, uh, or or at least in the end, it seemed that was really not a good excuse. It just came down to politics. Would we be in a different place today if the Keystone XL pipeline had been finished and the Biden administration didn't essentially stop it for good?

SPEAKER_07 29:50

Okay. The Keystone XL pipeline. The history of this was they spent almost 20 years getting permits. The Keystone XL pipeline comes out of Canada, comes down through North and South Dakota and dumps off somewhere at a refinery in the Midwest or wherever it was. And they spent almost 20 years getting permits. Trump came into office and he issued the permit right away. So they were near completion. Okay. They built this thing, and this is where you got the was it Standing Rock protests, where you had a bunch of Antifa people show up to try to say, you're putting this oil pipeline through Indian land and that whole deal. So when Biden came into office, despite the backed fact that the union that supports the pipeline workers endorsed Joe Biden, the first day in office, he canceled the permit. And then within about six months, the company that was behind the Keystone Pipeline construction said, We're done, we're never coming back, we're not even gonna try. So there is literally an empty pipeline running across Canada, dumping off into the United States with a cap on the end. It will never be used, it's private property, and they are done. No interest in coming back and finishing it. That was a huge that was what started the price increase because futures depended on that pipeline being finished. Yeah. Good job, Joe. And the justification was well, this is bad for the environment. Simultaneously, Joe Biden approved a similar pipeline over in Afghanistan and Myanmar and a couple other countries over there. Same type of pipeline, same type of environmental impact. Totally approved it. Totally different environment, Taylor. That's a different planet. Yeah, we don't care about people over there. You know, who cares that the Genghis River is full of sewage? Who cares that China produces most of the world's pollution? Right? Not our problem, not our backyard. So that is another one of those examples where, you know, the Biden administration, the Democrats, the socialists, they just think they're better than us. They think that we don't matter. They think that our prices don't matter, that we will. This is Ayn Rand's argument all the time. We cannibalize ourselves on behalf of the universal collective without actually realizing we're killing ourselves in the process, right? Uh God's Army Bratt says Trump's first term showed us he could lower gas prices. Trump says he cares about the people. High gas prices affect those that that speaks that speaks to most. I agree. I don't like the high gas prices either. But but, and I'll just use the bolt the talking point. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Even if this blockade continued on, even if the blockade continued on for another six months, another year, gas prices at will start to come down. Why? Venezuela is still ramping up. That Houston refinery is still taking orders. The new one that they just opened up for the first time in 50 years is still taking orders. Like there will come a point where there will be a new stasis. Guess who else is coming online? Russia. By the way, we have a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine that might be the end of that war. And there's been a lot of talk about trying to normalize relations with Russia. So even if that blockade continues with Iran, it hurts China more than it hurts us. It's just a matter of time. You know, you've got the Nord Stream pipeline that they could literally just it was what, three feet from being connected? And Ted Cruz blocked it. So, you know, it's something there, something to that. Let's continue on here.

SPEAKER_05 33:34

Yeah, I would just look up, I would just add up all of the different projects uh that have been slow walk, the the plants that were forced to shut down, the regulations that resulted in raising costs. Uh, it happened during the Obama administration. It continued through the Biden administration. Uh, we have been fixing that since we came in here just over a year ago. Uh, we're doing more deregulation at EPA in one year than has ever been done across all federal agencies of entire presidencies. We're keeping plants online that were slated to close. We we've had groundbreaking for new pipelines to deliver supplies. Uh, we have seen new small modular reactors, ground being broken for them as well. Uh, and so many more projects and investments uh on the horizon. You add all these projects up together, the United States is obviously going to be stronger for it.

SPEAKER_07 34:24

The United States will end up being stronger for it. And I wouldn't be surprised if Trump at some point tells uh tells gas companies that they need to do what their part to drop prices, stop the gouging effect that happens. Now, I know here in Washington State, if we just reverted back to the tax prices that we had when Trump took office, we'd be what 70, 80 cents less per gallon?

SPEAKER_14 34:46

Yeah, easy.

Tariffs Ruling And Birthright Citizenship

SPEAKER_07 34:47

Easy. Maybe more. I mean, it was it's a significant deal. The other uh the other consideration there too, and this was rumored over the weekend, is Trump is considering uh suspending the national uh gas tax, which I don't know what that is, 20, 30 cents a gallon, something like that. I mean, it's significant. Um, it's not as much as some of the states like Washington State or California put on, but that could bring prices down a little bit too. Moving on here, Trump also posted this. This is kind of uh an interesting little deal here. I love Justice Neil Gorsuch. He's a really smart and good man, but he voted against me and our country on tariffs. A devastating move. How do I reconcile this? So bad and hurtful to our country. I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Comey Barrett. But the same thing with her. They were appointed by me and yet have hurt our country so badly. I do not believe they meant to do so, but their decision on tariffs cost the United States$159 billion. That we have to pay back to enemies and people, companies, and countries that have been ripping us off for years. It's hardly believable. They could have solved that situation with a tiny sentence. Any money paid by others to the United States does not have to be paid back. Why wouldn't they have done so? With certain Republican-nominated justices that we have that we have on the Supreme Court, the Democrats don't really need to pack the court any longer. In fact, I should be the one wanting to pack the court. I'm working so hard to make America great again. And then people that I appointed have shown so little respect to our country and its people. What is the reason for this? They have to do the right thing, but it's really okay for them to be loyal to the person that appointed them to almost the highest position in the land. That is, a justice of the United States Supreme Court. Democrat justices always remain true to the people that honored them with for that very special nomination. They don't waver, no matter how good or bad a case may be. But Republican justices often go out of their way to oppose me because they want to show how, quote, independent or above it all they are. I get elected in a landslide, including winning the popular vote, all seven swing states, and electoral college clobbering in all U.S. counties by 86%, 2,750 to 525. I chose people to help our country, not hurt it. And now, based on what I witnessed recently by being the first president in history to attend a Supreme Court session, which fact was not even recognized or acknowledged out of respect for the position of president by the court, something which did not go unnoticed by the fake news media, they will be ruling against us on birthright citizenship, making us the only country in the world that practices this unsustainable, unsafe, and incredibly costly disaster. I don't want loyalty, but I do want and expect it from our country. Yes, for our country, yes. I have another way of doing tariffs, but it is far slower and more laborous than what was just determined in a close decision to be illegal or unconstitutional. With three powerful and highly accurate dissents, well, maybe Neil and Amy just had a really bad day, but our country can only handle so many decisions of that magnitude before it breaks down and cracks. Sometimes decisions have to be allowed to use good, strong common sense as a guide. A negative ruling on birthright citizenship on top of the recent Supreme Court tariff catastrophe is not economically sustainable for the United States of America, President Donald J. Trump.

SPEAKER_14 38:14

Wow. That was a story.

SPEAKER_07 38:17

Yeah. Yeah. He hits on tariffs, right? But he also hits on this birthright citizenship. And he says they will decide against him on the birthright citizenship. Do you think he knows something we don't know, or do you think he's just priming the well a little bit? I think he knows something. It'll be really interesting if he starts pushing packing the Supreme Court. I wonder if that'll make the Democrats backtrack on that. Oh, yeah. Could be interesting. He does bring that up, and it really is that threat historically going all the way back to FDR, was a significant impetus to get the Supreme Court to act a certain direction. There's something about them up there with their nine seats and the history of the nine seats, which is not written in the Constitution. That's just the way it is. There's something in there about that that these guys really want to have. It makes them very, very important. And if you dilute that or you do something where every president gets to appoint three people and they serve for, you know, so many years, or there's all kinds of different things they can do. They've even there's even been proposals of having like a let every president appoint three, and then you only allow like 15 to vote, and so then certain ones have to sit on the sideline, or they have to pick which 15 get the vote. They have to get benched, they have to get benched exactly. So it could be really interesting uh where that could go. I gosh, you know, the birthright citizenship is one of those things that we just kind of grew up believing was the way it was. And then when you really do look at it, you're like, oh, hold on a second here. Under the jurisdiction thereof, that's a de jure do jurisdiction. That's not a de facto jurisdiction. That should be something that has to do with, you know, your parents were under the jurisdiction of the state. So if your parents are illegal, this whole birthright tourism problem, they shouldn't just be citizens because you were standing on American soil and popped out a baby, especially when you're gaming the system. And I totally, completely buy into the argument that the founding fathers did not conceive of the idea that eight billion people around the planet could be a 12-hour plane ride from the United States. You know what I'm saying?

SPEAKER_14 40:24

Like what if we pop out a kid on an American cruise ship?

SPEAKER_07 40:29

Yeah. You know, what's interesting is we allow citizenship to parents that are under the jurisdiction of the United States who have children born on foreign soil. So I have two siblings who were born in Japan. They're citizens because my parents are citizens. I know quite a few people whose parents had them while they were living in Canada. They're not Canadian, they're American, right? So our country is really weird. You can have somebody of foreign citizenship, not under our jurisdiction, aside from if you commit a criminal offense, then the United States has jurisdiction over the matter, right? And they can loop you into it as a foreign national, but your children that are born here have full citizenship status. That doesn't make any sense. And again, we're the only country on the planet that does that. Trump had a really good uh Carlit said we should do reciprocal birthright citizenship. How would that work out? Birthright citizenship. Yeah. If you're born here to parents that are of another nation, we are will declare their children citizens of the other country and then we can deport them back. Is that what that means?

SPEAKER_19 41:35

I don't know.

SPEAKER_07 41:36

I don't know. All right, it will just force them to take them back. That's that's really what it should be. I understand if the Supreme Court came out and said, okay, you know, as of this ruling, everybody who has achieved citizenship by the former regime of birthright citizenship, how do you go unravel that? That could be really complicated, right? Right. But if you say from this point forward, the parents have to be under the jurisdiction of the United States, which means legal green card, domiciled, resident, whatever legal status you have to be here, which you surrender jurisdiction. When you apply for a green card, you come under the jurisdiction of the United States. When you fly here as a visa holder for tourism, you're not under the jurisdiction thereof. You have a pass, you know, you have a hall pass.

SPEAKER_14 42:26

Can we also say uh speak English?

SPEAKER_07 42:29

Speak, then I'll speak English.

SPEAKER_14 42:32

Yes, it's oh man. And it's not, it's not just to be an a-hole. It's like, you know, um, I'm getting tired of spending zillions of dollars on 50 different languages for pamphlets, you know.

SPEAKER_07 42:43

Dude, I went to the Seattle Building Department years ago.

SPEAKER_14 42:46

That's what I'm talking about.

SPEAKER_07 42:47

Oh my goodness, they have so much wall space dedicated to stupid pamphlets in different languages. That's what I'm talking about. It's almost hard to find the one in English. It's like, who's paying for all these? Dude, it's unreal.

SPEAKER_14 43:01

Oh, oh, wait, I'm paying for them. This is retarded.

Reporter Targeted And Election Claims

SPEAKER_07 43:05

You want to have a real awakening? Go down to the passport office in Seattle and sit in there. It's like nothing but he jobs and let's just say not traditional white Americans in the passport office. It's something to behold. Okay, so this is Donald Trump. He sat down with Cheryl Atkinson with full measure. I always I always like to, when we have these prominent reporters, I like to have everybody understand who these people are. Cheryl Atkinson is one of the literally handful of journalists in our country that have that's worth their medal. That when when they report on things, they're they're reporting on things from a position of fact. Okay. And she is the journalist when she was working at CBS News that broke the Fast and the Furious story. This is where Barack Obama was, through Eric Holder, was trafficking guns to the cartel. And then one of those guns got used to kill a border patrol agent. And when they found out the gun, you know, and they got the guy and they got the gun, they're like, whoa, this was bought from a store in Texas. And then you find out it's part of this fast and furious deal that Eric Holder was running through the ATF. And so Eric Holder ultimately got called into Congress to testify, refused to come in, and he was the first ever attorney general of the United States that was held in contempt of Congress. Did the DOJ pick up the case? No, of course. So he was just held in contempt and it just kind of sat there and it was a big nothing burger. But Cheryl Atkins is the one who broke that story. The story that Eric Holder would not come into Congress and talk about. That resulted in the death of a Border Patrol agent. As a result of that, she got spied on. The deep state came after her. Of course. One of the things they did was they tapped her phone lines, they tapped her internet. There's a whistleblower named Jonathan McGreevy that was teamed up with a Secret Service cyber agent named Sean Bridges. They went out to her house dressed up as the internet company, and they literally put like a second uh connection on her house. So they had full access to what she was doing on the internet. Simultaneously to that, or in the process of doing that, they also planted child pornography on her husband's computer. Oh, geez. So her husband gets arrested for child pornography. They took and and it's on a laptop that has a bunch of CBS stuff on it. So CBS is now looped on in on this, and they pay for forensic analysis that determines that the child pornography was never opened on his computer, but it was planted there and it originated from a government IP address. No kidding. So then his case was dropped. Okay. She sued the Department of Justice saying, hey, we want to know, we want discovery, we want to know where this came from. And a judge dismissed the case and basically said, I'm not going to give you a carte blanch warrant to go fishing. You need to find out who planted it, and then I'll give you the warrant to go figure out where it came from. So the case kind of died, and maybe she's still working it through the courts, but it kind of ended there. Meanwhile, of course, CBS was like, hey, we don't want a reporter that's actually reporting on news that causes her to be the target of the deep state. And so they fired her. So she eventually made her way over to work alongside John Solomon at just the news. And she she still has a show on TV on Sundays called Full Measure. She is again one of these really good reporters, and she's covered all kinds of stuff. COVID vaccine airs, she's covered some election issues. She's one of the very few reporters that when she has a report, she's worth listening to. She sat down with Donald Trump. And again, and again, here's another example of they know this information. Okay. They know this information, but the mainstream news will not tell it to you. When we talk about Venezuela and we talk about Iran and we talk about Cuba and China, we have to also acknowledge election meddling.

SPEAKER_01 46:57

On Venezuela and voter fraud, there are Venezuelan engineer whistleblowers who've provided your administration, my understanding, is with a lot of information and documentation alleging vote rigging in the U.S. elections, including in 2020, through an operation engineered in part by our foreign adversaries and centered in Venezuela. Are you familiar with this information and is anything going to come of that?

SPEAKER_30 47:20

A little bit. You know, when I used to say that, they'd say, oh, the cameras would turn off. How can you sit now? They don't turn. The information, a lot of it's already out there. The election was rigged. It was rigged. You look at Georgia, you look at Pennsylvania, you look at these states, they were rigged. It was a rigged election, and they used COVID to do it, and they used crooked, dirty cops to do it. You know, they're dirty cops. Uh like you read about Comey. Comey is a dirty cop, bad guy, bad for the country, bad guy. But no, the 2020 election was rigged. Anytime you have mail-in voting, you're gonna have a rigged election. Anytime you're not using voter ID, the Democrats don't want they're fighting us on the Save America Act. Uh anytime you don't have when somebody says we don't want voter identification, that means they want to cheat. Then they say we don't want citizenship, we don't want proof of citizenship, they don't want it to be a part of the voting process. And yet when it comes to voting, the interesting thing is 97% of the Republicans want voter ID. But if you had the Republicans and the Democrats together, 86% want Jimmy Carter. I mean, I wasn't a big fan of him as a president, but Jimmy Carter had a committee that was set up along with Scoop Jackson, some very respected people. And the primary finding of the committee on the election stuff, primary finding of the committee was you can't have mail-in voting, it's crooked.

Ballot Harvesting And Border Incentives

SPEAKER_07 49:02

Can't have mail in voting, it's crooked. I want to show this little clip right here. This is another example of voter fraud. And again, voter fraud is a big, big issue. There's a lot of people that think it's isolated to the machines, and there's another camp that think it's isolated to the mail and ballots. And the truth of the matter is it's all of the above. Here's an old, this is a clip from 20. Let's see, when did this come out? I can't remember. It was like 2021, 2022, somewhere around there. And it was down in Texas. And this woman did, in fact, get indicted by Ken Paxson. When this video dropped, she got investigated and she did get indicted. Now the charges are ridiculous compared to what you hear her saying. They chart they basically caught her on a handful of these vote fraud cases, you know, vote fraud allegations, but it stuck. And but when you listen to her talking, this is what's going on behind the scenes with activists, these bureaucrats that get involved in elections, these different NGOs and these different vote getters. Listen to this.

SPEAKER_06 50:03

This week, we introduce you to Raquel Rodriguez and her illegal election law activities in San Antonio, Texas. Well, there is more. Listen carefully as she tells her undercover journalists the cost of buying votes.

SPEAKER_15 50:14

I've got three uh Democrats, uh, three Republicans, and the rest are Democrats.

SPEAKER_07 50:21

Okay. So um notice how she says she's got Democrats, the rest, the plurality, but she has Republicans that are engaging in this practice. Do you want to know why the Senate won't pass the Safe America Act?

SPEAKER_15 50:34

How much money are we talking? Because just so you know, when you don't when you do things like this for vote, you're talking between five to eight dollars per vote. I'm just saying you know, you have an idea, and I'm gonna bring$3,500 to the to the plate county wide.

SPEAKER_07 50:51

So I know what I'm bringing. That's enough to flip most county elections, by the way. Board of commissioners, city councils, mayor, totally enough to flip it.

SPEAKER_17 51:04

Like model right now. He said, Okay, Raquel, I'm if you were running what would you do? So he sat me down and I said, I would do this, this, this, this, this, and this. He said, What's what money do you think you would need? And I budgeted everything, right? Okay, boom, you do it. So he was paying me five thousand a month, and now he's paying me eight thousand a month. Why? Because I took any extra job.

SPEAKER_16 51:24

So between you and me, I got four judges that are calling me right now, and this is what they're costing me. And they're like, we want to be a part of this group. So if we pay you uh three thousand five hundred dollars each, that's like 12 brand, dude.

unknown 51:39

So those three judges that I'm talking about, and that's Renee Yonda, Nicole Garza, right?

SPEAKER_16 51:45

They're paying me$3,500, me$3,500 to make sure that their name is on the ballot.

SPEAKER_07 51:54

That's a primary election, huh? Judges, Republicans, Democrats. How much did the city council need to cost?

SPEAKER_17 52:01

I gave you, I gave you my vote. I paid$5,000 a month for me,$8,000 for Tom.$8,000 a month.$8,000 for RT. How many months will it go? Seven. It's$56,000. Probably. And then and then two months, and two months of early voting. Two months of early voting is five people from five to seven.

SPEAKER_07 52:23

Under Texas Code, is it illegal to harvest ballots? It also is illegal to pay others to harvest to ballot harvest. Ballot harvesting is a felony if done with three or more people.

SPEAKER_06 52:35

When we asked about buying votes for U.S. Senate candidate MJ Hagar and candidate Biden, here's what she had to say.

SPEAKER_17 52:48

At least five thousand. For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at fifty-five thousand. I'm not gonna over promise because remember, we we're we're 16 days till election day. You give me cash, you can do whatever you want to do. Yeah, I'm getting the vital vote out, but I mean, I'm not gonna do it for free. In other words, if they don't pay me, I'm like, excuse me, I don't that's another worry. I don't have to worry about it.

SPEAKER_08 53:30

You said it was like five or eight dollars what per vote?

SPEAKER_17 53:32

How many votes? I mean, how much are we looking at roughly? Shoot, you know what? It's eight dollars per vote, but I would say the I mean, like right now, I'd say five to six bucks. Let's say six bucks per vote. Let's not go eight dollars, okay? Let's say six votes, six dollars per vote, right? And I'm gonna bring you five thousand votes.

SPEAKER_07 53:52

Five thousand and the video goes on and on and on. Doesn't that make your blood boil? Doesn't that make your doesn't it give you goosebumps to think that there are Democrats and Republicans? Why won't they pass the Save America Act? Uh well you know, where do you think they're getting a lot of these ballots that they're getting? What's been going on down there at the southern border? Has it been like wide open? Why has it been wide open? Why has it been wide open, Ron? Every county, she's just fleecing over a county. If I was in that county, I would just assume that none of my elected officials, including the judges, may not be fairly elected. And what did Trump say? Everywhere you have mail and ballots, you have at least that kind of fraud, on top of the fact that Cheryl said there was also a Venezuelan angle. And what were they doing? Sending people up through the Darien Gap and into our country. And what else were they doing? They rigged our voting machines, they created them. They created them.

SPEAKER_01 54:53

So why open borders? As straightforward as securing the border seemed to be once you got into office, it almost implies that another president could reverse it as quickly. Is there any way to protect against that in the future?

SPEAKER_30 55:05

Yeah, vote Republican.

SPEAKER_01 55:09

As straightforward as securing the borders seemed to be once.

SPEAKER_07 55:12

Vote Republican and pray that your Republican is one buy-in ballots. Oh now, the Democrats over in LA, which is one of the biggest recipients of illegal aliens, also, and I don't have this clip, but one of the things that has in fact been happening is other states will bust their homeless population to Los Angeles. Okay, this happens. I had a video teed up that I decided not to do for the sake of time. I know, pretty rare that I considered time on this podcast that talked, it was a longer video, but to get to the meat of it, we had to get way too deep in the video. But it was a couple that was but bust from Houston or uh Austin, Texas, to Las Vegas. They were flown, excuse me. I said bus, they were flown. They were bought a ticket and then flown to Burbank, California, where they were basically walking around looking for a homeless encampment. And what has Project Veritas been doing? They were releasing a whole bunch of videos on Skid Row with the homeless population made up of citizens and not a citizens, basically getting their signatures, registering them to vote so that they could harvest their ballot. Which explains why in the mayor oral debate in LA, there were responses about do you support or do you want U.S. citizens not to vote? Non-citizens should they be allowed to vote in local elections.

SPEAKER_03 56:34

Is this a yes or no? Mr. Pratt? No. Mayor Bass.

SPEAKER_33 56:38

It depends. It's not a yes or no. Depends on what. Well, first of all, when you say non-citizens, it doesn't mean they're here illegal. It doesn't mean they're undocumented. They could have green cards, they could be here perfectly legal, and there's a lot of states and cities that do that on very, very local elections. We have to see what the councilman is proposing.

SPEAKER_20 56:57

Council member Bremen.

SPEAKER_38 56:58

Yeah, I would say again, it it does depend in other places. School boards have non-cidized vote.

SPEAKER_26 57:06

I have a question for the news. Democrats are in trouble. By the way, Spencer, Spencer Pratt's a nice guy, and he's fine. He's no genius. You don't need to be a genius. It's basically he's in a debate with two women that have tag teamed to f up the city as badly as you could possibly f it up in the last decade. So that's what they've been up to. So that's an easy one, right? Because you just fing go, hey, look at the piece of city you guys have been presiding over. You want. But it's also imagine doing like a math debate, right? And and it's just me, and you go, and I got my other two partners up there I'm debating against. And then the guy from Telemundo, he goes, uh, question to all the people on stage. What's two plus two? And I go, four. And then all my other people on stage go, well, it's a complicated question. Now it depends if we're doing metric or a standard. And you're like, why am I winning this debate? Because you guys can't answer the fing question. And you can't answer the question because Democrats, they've painted themselves into a corner, which is all of their thoughts are radical and nobody wants them. Nobody wants women and men competing together in sports. Nobody wants a wide open border. Nobody wants illegals running through their city selling fentanyl and human trafficking. All the shit your left flank wants, nobody wants. But you have to run and you're trying to get popular votes. So you can't piss off your left flank, but you want to get elected. So that means you have to pretend weird. Like, no, we don't want illegals voting.

SPEAKER_18 58:51

Yeah.

Paid Protests And Gas Price Spin

SPEAKER_26 58:51

But you can't just say no. Now, Spencer Pratt can just say no because the people support him don't want that. And when they go, what's good? We want the border shut. Yes, I want the border shut. I don't want men competing in women's. No, I don't want that. It's easy. But when you ask it to Gavin Newsome, he's in a he's in trouble because he has the sensible answer that 90% of America agrees with. And then there's this left lunatic flank that he has to f out out to.

Thomas Massie And Libertarian Contradictions

SPEAKER_07 59:20

Don't say this. And the thing is, is the left lunatic flank is well funded. They're well funded. This weekend on my little street corner by my grocery store that I go to every day, there was a no kiggs protest. Oh boy. Without exception, every person on that corner was over 60 years old. Without exception. Okay. These are people that are dyed in the wool, true blue, vote blue no matter who people. And I don't even sometimes I wonder, you're only as good as the information you get. Do they really think that a king would allow that protest to happen? What the heck? But it was put on by a group here in Kitsap County called Indivis Indivisible Kitsap. Indivisible is a George Soros funded organization. And they're paired up with Code Pink. Oh boy. So they get some Nivell Singham money as well. And they and whoever or whoever the organiz uh organizers of the I got the hiccups. Whoever the organizers of that are get paid. And they have a mailing list, an email list here in the county of about 14,000 people. There's 250,000 people in this county plus. Okay. So they got about 14,000 people that are that left flank. And they will show up to a protest. Why? I don't know. They drank the blue Kool-Aid and it wasn't laced with arsenic. So they're not dead yet. Okay. But they showed up at this protest. Again, mostly older people. And I'm walking, I'm looking at that street corner, and I say to my wife, you know, I've always assumed that these are just diehards, but I'm starting to wonder if they're actually paid because we are hearing that more and more that the left-wing protesters often are actually getting paid minimum wage to go stand a street corner. If you have nothing better to do with your Saturday, yeah, let's go make 65 bucks or whatever and stand on the corner for three hours with a no king's sign or whatever the case is. Yeah, and then go get some dinner. And where are they getting that money? From the organizers that are getting paid the bigger money. Huh. Yet a Republican protest, I didn't get paid to go to Jesus. Okay. I went of my own free will and choice and paid dearly for it, by the way. It was very expensive for me to go to that. Now, a lot of the talking points that these No Kings people are pounding on, one of them is gas prices. I understand. Gas prices affect everybody. Another one is the war in Iran. I understand Trump ran on not having more endless wars. This might be the war to end war. I don't know. You know, we'll see. But he did run on that. And so you see the left wing who doesn't care about this. They had no problem with Barack Obama starting a war in Syria that most Americans, in fact, the libertarian candidate, the libertarian candidate, Johnson was his name, didn't even know what Aleppo was in a in a nationally televised interview. What's Aleppo? What's Aleppo? That's where Joe Kent's wife died was in Syria, right? What's Aleppo? The Libertarians like completely unaware of what Barack Obama was doing overseas. Libya? Anyone? Libya? Libya? How about pulling out of Iraq and then going right back in with bigger numbers? How about doing nothing to end the Afghanistan war? The left, no problem with that. No problem with that. But Trump gets into office, runs on no war, and they use it as a pry bar. Trump gets into office, gas prices go up to comparable rates that they were under under Biden and Obama, pry bar goes up. You've got these talking points. Trump comes in and closes the border, and all of a sudden you have another wing of extremism. It's the libertarians. What libertarians are to conservatives is the exact same thing that the far-left communists are to blue dog Democrats. It's like, yeah, we need your votes, but we really don't want you around. The greatest example of this is Thomas Massey. Now, podcaster um John Doyle did an amazing, an amazing podcast on Thomas Massey. Now, I've expressed my opinions on Thomas Massey. Guy drives me crazy. I really appreciate what he's done for January 6th. Truly do. But on many, many other issues, I've thought, dude, you have missed the mark entirely. You can't come out and be like, I'm pro make America great again with Donald Trump, who is slashing regulations, redoing the entire world order, redollarizing the economy, and then turn around and have a have a have a press conference along with Marjorie Trader Green that has pictures of Donald Trump, the pedophile in the background, and be like, I'm trying to support the president. Why won't he just disclose this information? Right? It's like it doesn't even make sense. And Donald Trump has called him a total sleaze bag and one of the worst ever. Why is that? Here's why.

SPEAKER_20 1:04:14

Well, Thomas Massey is just a principled constitutionalist. That is why he votes the way that he does. You'll hear this one from Massey supporters quite often. Uh, let me let you in on a little secret. The Constitution does not actually outline policy positions or specific beliefs for people to hold. The Constitution outlines the structure, functions, and powers of our government. Please show me where in the Constitution it says that we aren't allowed to have a border, that we have to import the entire third world. Literally show me where. Being a constitutionalist doesn't actually mean anything in this context. There's no tangible belief set there. Maybe you support gun rights, free speech. Okay, cool. Yeah, that's fine. That's all well and good. What about the actual issues that we're talking about right now, facing Americans right now? I'm not saying those aren't important issues. I am saying things like border security. What does the constitution say? What's the position that we're supposed to infer from that document regarding that issue? Leftists use that all the time, by the way. My constitution. Curiously, they always use it as a response to say Trump can't do this, Trump can't do that, Trump can't secure the border, Trump can deport people. Oh, the Constitution. Are we saying they're correct? Is that what we're saying? These are the authorities on the Constitution. Yeah, how's that been for us for the last what 60 years? Thomas Massey says yes to that. Thomas Massey agrees with that sentiment. Well, Thomas Massey voted to keep the border open.

SPEAKER_07 1:05:32

Did you know that, Ron? Mm-hmm. Yeah, but 92% of the time he votes with Republicans. It's the 7% of the time when he takes his principled stance that he takes a far left wing position, open borders.

SPEAKER_14 1:05:44

I'm I would say that the only reason that I knew that is because I listened to this podcast.

SPEAKER_07 1:05:48

Yeah, because he does a good job, kind of as a wolf in sheep's clothing. Here's another one, right? Thomas Mass gets on with Tucker Carlson and says, Oh, my kid, my the guy I'm running against gets all this money from out of State and it's coming from all these NGOs and it's coming from the Jewish lobby. Meanwhile, Massey's taking a lot of money from a dude named Muhammad. Turns out most of Thomas Massey's individual contributions come from far left California. He's received$225,216 in this cycle and only$70,000 from his state. His out-of-state contributions were$1,162,867, meaning only 5.71% of his grassroots donations come from where it matters most, his home state. This is a really bad for a seven-time incumbent. And here's the numbers. He gets out-of-state contributions. 94.29% of his campaign donations are not coming even from his state, let alone his constituency. California makes up the grand total, some coming from Texas. These are probably coming from far left donors and far less groups. Florida, Kentucky, only 70,000, and New York make up the top. That's pretty bad. That's pretty bad.

SPEAKER_14 1:07:07

Kind of paints a weird picture, doesn't it?

SPEAKER_07 1:07:09

Yep. John Doyle goes on to talk about this, the fundraising.

SPEAKER_20 1:07:13

We spoke a little bit about APAC earlier. Thomas Massey doesn't take money from them. That's really cool and all. Did you know that Thomas Massey does take money from IPAC? Ever heard of IPAC, also known as the Integrity PAC? It's a Pennsylvania-based left-wing political action committee, largely focused on supporting the plight of the Palestinian people. Okay, makes sense why they would support Massey, right? That's fine. In 2025, this pack launched an initiative in collaboration with the Democratic Socialists of America to oppose ICE, whom they refer to as Gestapo-like gangsters, guerrilla warfare style in the streets, all that stuff, you know, language designed to get them killed. The same pack working to help re-elect Thomas Massey is also helping to fund all of those radical leftist agitators who harass ICE agents and impede them from doing their job, which is deporting illegal aliens, again, because they want to get them all killed. So, based on Thomas Massey's voting record, now it makes even more sense why IPAC would be supporting him. Does it not? Thomas Massey even flew all of the way to Pennsylvania to meet with the chairman of the PAC, Rafayed Aburjan. Very American name. I can't even pronounce it, I can't even make fun of the name. The name is by itself a mockery of producing noise with my mouth. I wonder which side of the Civil War that guy's ancestors fought for. We're at a stage in America where we we can't even do the whole North and South thing anymore because now the new Americans weren't even here in the first place.

SPEAKER_07 1:08:38

That's the problem. Republicans get really in on this libertarian thing because it does sound good to us. It does sound good to us. Let's return to a constitution and limited government. Well, does limited government mean mean open borders because we don't fund ice and border patrol? Does limited government mean we just let people sell us cheap crap from slave nations like China? Does limited government Do you see where we're going with this?

SPEAKER_19 1:09:04

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 1:09:04

It's completely and totally inconsistent, which explains why Thomas Massey, the guy who, you know, the America First crowd is like, if Thomas Massey is the problem, then we're never gonna make America great again. Um, Thomas Massey is one of the reasons why it's been such a struggle to make America great again.

SPEAKER_20 1:09:23

Remember the day after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, when Thomas Massey practically blamed the assassination on Trump's rhetoric by telling him that he had to turn down the temperature. Remember when Trump was trying to get universities to stop letting men into women's restrooms by threatening to revoke federal funding? Then MIT refused to do so, and Thomas Massey praised them for not taking the bribe. Me when I'm fiscally conservative and I'm against people withholding federal funding, Thomas Massey is trans, literally, like confirmed by the way. Again, water seeks its own level. The guy's doing too many favors for these people. We can only assume that this is the case. Remember when Thomas Massey used a 10-year-old tweet from Charlie Kirk to insinuate that Charlie Kirk, who is currently deceased and therefore unable to speak for himself, would still support him against Trump's primary challenge? Remember when Thomas Massey campaigned for Mitch McConnell? Literally LOL? Remember when Chenk Uger from TYT, Jack Dorsey? Remember when these people endorsed Thomas Massey? Far left people who are pro-censorship. They love Thomas Massey. Remember when the Annunciation Catholic school was shot up by a trans Why is that?

SPEAKER_07 1:10:23

Because Thomas Massey's like the government shouldn't tell private corporations what they can and can't do. So go ahead and let them censor. This is why Thomas Massey's always been like a burr in my side, because it's like, I mean, I like your libertarian stances, but dude, like they are they come out at the worst moments.

SPEAKER_20 1:10:43

Gender psychopath, and Thomas Massey took to Twitter a few days later to let everybody know that he supports the rights of mentally ill freaks who are so misaligned with reality that they cut their own penises off to own guns. Remember when Thomas Massey cried about Trump blowing up narco-terrorists who were actively trying to import poison into the United States to profit off the suffering and death of Americans, suffering and death that disproportionately impacts his own state? Oh, he's just a principled guy. The only solid principle is helping the left win at all costs. That is the only principle that maps across the board. That's why the retard right loves him so much. The people who are actively saying that they want Democrats to win the midterms, the people who campaigned for Kamala Harris in 2024, the Ian Carrolls, the Candace Owens, the Tucker Carlsons. Thomas Massey is the personification, the distillation of the retard right as a whole. All of these freaks rolled up into one dude.

SPEAKER_07 1:11:41

Remember that this podcast he did was great. It just went through all of this stuff. All of this stuff. If we would sit down with him and we would enjoy his company, we would really enjoy his company. He's got an amazing life story, he's got a cool farm, he's wicked intelligent. But the adversaries of America take advantage of him, they weaponize his virtue against us. Oh, you want limited government? Doesn't that mean open borders? Because you don't want to spend money, right? Oh, we like limited government. That means we don't want to oppose people who are so mentally ill they'll chop off their genitalia from having guns. Oh, I oppose all gun bans at all. Well, on a normal Tuesday, I would agree with that statement. But when we get down to the nuance of it, do you see what I'm saying? Like maybe not those people get, you know, like there's kind of some bounds to this. Again, unfettered freedom turns us into Mad Max. And that's where Thomas Massey's policies would ultimately go. And Thomas Massey, libertarians have the same mental illness that communists have. You can never actually try their solutions. Our founding fathers clearly explained to us that government exists to regulate our vices. A libertarian would give us over to those vices the same as a communist would. Does that make sense? And so a libertarian, just like an intellectual communist, will go, well, we've never tried full-on libertarianism. We've never gone far enough. So, you know, since we haven't let everybody have guns, and since we don't have free trade around the world with no borders anywhere, they can always say we didn't do it enough. We weren't liberty-oriented enough. So let's keep taking another bite of the apple at more and more bad ideas.

SPEAKER_14 1:13:44

I thought Robert Downing Jr. said it best. He said, never go full retard.

SPEAKER_07 1:13:48

Never go full retard. Never go full retard right. Exactly. Trump also came out and said this. We have another another of these names that have already come up in the show. Palestinian Chuck Schumer is hiring Eric Holder. Who's Eric Holder? He was Barack Obama's wingman, attorney general under Barack Obama, the one who instituted Fast and the Furious and turned a blind eye to all of the retarded things that Obama was doing. Famous, famous for handing guns to Mexican cartels under Barack Hussein Obama administration. Isn't it funny how in one weekend we have Eric Holder getting hired? Trump's doing an interview with Cheryl Atkinson, whose story intersects with Eric Holder. Isn't it funny? Wow. Right? It's a small club, Ron. It's a small club, and we're not in it. Although that club hit me with their club the last five years as part of a Democrat-led, quote, election integrity group. Must be the same election integrity group that Biden showed up that he called the largest voter fraud organization in the history of mankind. You know, the one that pays people in your local county to go harvest ballots. Even judges, even judges got in on it that will no doubt try to suppress Republican voters and interfere with our elections. Oh at least someone said it. That's their objective. Furthermore, Mark Elias, who's Mark Elias? He was one of the attorneys at Perkins Couie. Where did we where did Perkins Couie come on the scene? It was the Greguire election here in Washington State. Probably our first big example of flipping an election. There were ballots coming out of people's trunks for what they're doing. Dino Rossi won twice. Dino Rossi and Greguire. Right. That's where Perkins-Cooey came in, and that's what got them on the scene. And the Democrats said, hey, we like him. And we they hired Perkins-Coey as the Democrat National Convention law firm.

unknown 1:15:35

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 1:15:35

Perkins-Cooey then went on to take money from Hillary Clinton,$2 million, and pass it on to Fusion GPS in England for the Steel dossier, which is the origin of the Russia Gate concerns. Same dudes. Mark Elias, a terrible lawyer with a horrible track record, is also involved. This is the same disgusting individual who was responsible for the fake Russia dossier from a foreign nation to meddle in the 2016 election, which I won in his in historic fashion. The Democrats are totally unhinged and will not allow them to thr and we will not allow them to threaten the integrity of our elections. During my historic 2024 election in 2024, when I won every single swing state and decisively won both the electoral and popular votes by wide margins, it is amazing that Trump won both those elections. Considering the structure of the elections, considering the ballot fraud at every different level you can think of, it is amazing that he won those elections. I think there is a fair argument that there are no blue states. There is a fair argument that there are no blue states. The Republicans had an election integrity army in every single state to preserve the sanctity of each illegal vote. And who were those people? I was in prison, so I wasn't there. But who literally camped outside these voting centers and turned away U-Haul trucks full of ballots in Detroit. It's the thousands of lawyers that the RNC finally manned up and hired under the direction of Laura Trump and uh the guy who's running for Senate in North Carolina, who had attorneys ready to go if a single ballot showed up after close of polling and went to a court to make sure those ballots couldn't be counted. It was that volunteer army for the most part that came out to secure the elections and make sure that the Democrats couldn't tip the scales 15 or 20% like they needed to. We will be doing the same again in 2026, but it will be much bigger and stronger. They've learned it works. The only thing these people are afraid of is exposure and a badge and a gun. All Americans should have their voices heard by casting a vote. Be assured this election will be fair, Donald J. Trump. There was a post that came out this weekend, and this was by one of uh this is a really good post, and I deleted who posted it, but it doesn't matter, it's for public consumption. This is a comprehensive timeline of chronological timeline of evidence of corruption, election interference, and subversion of the government and all illegal activities.

SPEAKER_14 1:17:58

This must be a pretty lengthy document.

Comey Indictment And Justice Debate

SPEAKER_07 1:18:00

Now, in June 2009, there's a single post. This is where Carter Page became a CIA informant. Okay. So he was a CIA informant. He was doing consulting work and whatnot overseas with the Russians, and he became an ongoing CIA conformant. Every time he had a conversation with the Russians, he'd call up the CIA and he'd get debriefed. So he was an asset of the CIA. In 2013, the FBI completed paperwork allowing the SDI to designate Steele as a confidential human source. Who's Christopher Steele, the one who wrote the Steele dossier? 2015, there was evidence of Clinton corruption. The and Jill Dr. Jill McCabe, who's Jill McCabe? Andy McCabe, the deputy director of the FBI's wife, was running for a state senate seat, and she took donations from Hillary Clinton totaling$675,000, approximately 40% of her total contributions. That's from the Horowitz report. In 2015, New York Times reports that Secretary Clinton used a private email account. June 26, 2015, Trump declared announces his candidacy for president. In 2015, evidence of corruption, FBI opens the mid-year exam into Hillary Clinton, who then destroys her cell phones, bleach bits her servers, and you know claims the not have the information. July 2015, Russia hacks the DNC Democrat National Committee. There is dispute over that. A lot of people think it was Seth Rich. Summer 2015, Russia initiates social media chaos. They spent about 115, 119 grand on Facebook ads, a drop in the bucket. Drop in the bucket. But basically, they're just trying to gen up controversy. Summer fall of 2015, Russia initiates, uh, excuse me, March of 2019, Russia, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, John Podesta, falls victim to an email phishing scam by RussiaGate. This is where we get the Podesta leaks that were on WikiLeaks that expose Pizzagate. That's kind of where that comes from. March 2016, a guy named Misfood, who is a uh British spy academic, uh, has George Papadopoulos join the Trump campaign as an advisor. And Papadopoulos meets in London made based professor Joseph Misfood, who Papadopoulos understands to have substantial connections to the Russian government officials. March 2021, Trump identifies Papadopoulos and Carter Page as members of his foreign policy team. Trump's campaign was infiltrated. Remember, Trump was a reality TV star, at least that's what they were selling the world. The Democrats were. And what he did was he had an interview where he gets asked a staged question. What's your foreign policy plan? You have no experience. And he goes, Well, I've got good advisors. And he reaches into his suit coat and he pulls out a piece of paper and unfolds it and he reads off a couple names, one of which being Carter Page, and one of which being George Papadopoulos, who had already been set up as these people that are now in Trump's orbit. He's got hundreds of advisors. And who does he read off? Papadopoulos and Carter Page. Somebody in his campaign handed him a piece of paper, knowing that question was going to be asked, and he goes, Oh, well, I have foreign advisors, pulls it out of his pocket, reads the name. Boom. Now you have the public connection. Somebody in his campaign handed him that piece of paper and just goes, if they ask this question here, just give them these names. These are good guys. And they are good guys. Okay. Trump appointed Paul Manafort to manage the Republican National Convention for the Trump campaign. Unfortunately, Paul Manafort is a little bit dirty because he's a political operative. Following the meeting with Joseph Misfoot in Italy, Papadopoulos tells Trump, Jeff Sessions, and Carter Page, and other campaign members that he can use Russian connections to arrange a meeting between Trump and Putin. So Papadopoulos has been set up to do this. What's so wrong with being allies with Russia? Right? And then it goes on to it goes on here, and eventually we get to all the information we have. But this is a timeline that goes through every act of corruption and every act by the government and every everything that went on in this case. It goes all the way to January 6th. Okay. It goes and goes and goes. It goes all the way to January 6th. When we talk about a grand conspiracy case, it's the same dang people that are involved in thing over and over and over and over again. Commit the crime, cover up the crime, commit a new crime, cover up the cover up of the cover up of the crime of the crime, commit another crime, covering up the cover-up over and over and over again. All the way to the point where you start getting DC officials like Muriel Bowser and police chiefs in January 6th, covering that up. Again, setting up the Proud Boys and all and the Oath Keepers and others to instigate the January 6th, or at least take the blame for instigating January 6th. It goes on and on and on and on and on and on. Grand conspiracy case. You want to know why J6ers haven't been settled with? You want to know why the 2020 election being rigged and stolen isn't ubiquitous across media? Is because a lot of media reporters are still hanging on to stories that they wrote as part of the cover-up. And they don't want to be wrong. There were people who won Pulitzer Prizes for their Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia interviews. Right? And on and on it goes. Like I said, one big conspiracy. Still scrolling. Still scrolling. One huge conspiracy. January 6th, a detailed timeline. Wonder if I'm mentioned in here. Some dude went up the stairs and tried to push on a gate. Fascinating. Fascinating. Anyways, very interesting. So we await for that. Now James Comey has been indicted for threatening Trump's life. And there's a trial date that's been set for July 15th. Pretty soon. Whoa. Yeah, pretty soon. I'm sure it'll get pushed out just because I don't think he wants to go on trial. Unless, of course, he paid for the jurors, which, you know, far be it from me to put that past the possibility. Trump gets asked this out on the White House lawn. Sorry for the sound. There's a helicopter in the background.

SPEAKER_11 1:24:23

President Trump. Are you worried now that the next time there's a Democratic president, they will indict your FBI director or people in your FBI?

SPEAKER_29 1:24:34

That's what they tried to do, right? They did it with me for four years, they went after me. They went after me for four years, and that doesn't include the four break years that we had in the White House. So when I ran it from you know in 2016 when we won, it began before I got to office. You know that. Wait a minute. Before I came to office, I started hearing rumors about Russia. I said, what the hell do I have to do with Russia? Nothing. And then it got worse and worse, and some of the fakers, not you, but some of the fake news picked it up and they loved it. And we went through a long time with that. And despite that, we had a great first term.

SPEAKER_11 1:25:15

That's how it went where they should go and take a mugshot. Is this more about justice or is it about revenge?

SPEAKER_29 1:25:23

It's about justice, really. Not revenge, it's justice. It's also about the fact that you can't let this go on. They are sick radical left people, and they can't get away with it. And Tomy was one of the people. He wasn't the biggest, but he's a dirty cop. He's always been a dirty cop. Everybody knew it. And it's uh, you know, as far as the case is concerned, we gave an answer.

Hantavirus Media Surge And Testing Push

SPEAKER_07 1:25:50

We just is this about retribution? Yeah, retribution for trying to overthrow our country and pretty much succeeding. Now, the Democrats, the Socialists, the Deep State, they're not as creative as you might think. They tend to run the same game plan over and over and over again. Do you remember COVID? Do you remember scenes like this coming out of COVID? And by the way, these are verified pictures, right? So here's COVID 2020. Here's a cameraman filming someone dressed up in a biohazard suit. Yeah, right. This is like Anderson Cooper standing on his knees in the water and and then somebody in a canoe going by, and then some lady just goes walking, and it's like the canoe was staged. It's like, you know, it's like eight inches of water. Oh, this is devastating flooding. Listen, I'm not saying eight inches isn't bad, but it ain't that. So here you have COVID 2020. Well, now we already have Hontavirus 2026. Oh. Oh, isn't this an important election election year, Ron? Maybe, maybe we should declare a national emergency. Dr.

SPEAKER_14 1:26:51

Pierre Corey.

SPEAKER_07 1:26:52

Safe space, man. Safe distancing. Dr. Pierre Corey, who was one of the uh doctors that went and stood on the Capitol steps and had two million views on Breitbart, and then they got censored. And Simone Gold and Pierre Corey and um the African-American doctor out of Texas all just got censored to oblivion. He noted something really interesting with this hantavirus that's going on a cruise ship that there seems to be some type of media coordination.

SPEAKER_03 1:27:19

What actually kind of intrigued me more, about what you said, is a colleague told me that there was like a hundred thousand articles written around the world on hantavirus in the last couple of days. And that's not typical for a hontavirus outbreak. Certainly there's always a tension and people get scared, but like that's the other thing with COVID. It was COVID, COVID, COVID 24 7. And then when you told when you said in your intro about how it seems to be driven by influencers, I'm sorry if I'm getting too like uh I don't know. I actually never want to use the word tin hat because I'm not a tin hat, but I I these patterns are it are anomalous. Why with just this little Outbreak of a few cases, suddenly, like it's consuming the world's media cycle. Like, for instance, Amon talking about it today. What you know, it's because it's being driven by something, it's being driven by something.

SPEAKER_07 1:28:11

Hey, I know who it's being driven by, it's being driven by legacy media who really doesn't want this election to go fair. We would really like to impeach Donald Trump. And even one of Trump's advisors, he just got stuck with her. Dr. Burks. Dr. Burks made a media appearance on News Nation. They gave her some airtime. And listen to what she has to say. We must resist this at all costs. We must resist this. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. There are millions of people who took the COVID vaccine that probably regret it today. There are millions of people who bought into the whole COVID narrative that look back with hindsight 2020 and regret it. Don't get sucked in again.

SPEAKER_22 1:29:03

So the Andes strain is the only strain where we have mapped human-to-human transmission. And I caution people because when we say human-to-human transmission, we're talking about people who develop symptoms. But because we're not testing populations with RNAs, we don't really know whether there are subclinical cases. So there could be more human-to-human transmission than we actually see. It's never good to track viruses through symptoms. We should be tracking viruses through blood tests like PCR. We've learned that with COVID. Extraordinarily helpful. Many universities were able to open and schools were able to open because they provided weekly testing and it really prevented spread. So we know how to deal with these viruses. We just need to move into the 21st century and make testing more widely available to those who need it.

unknown 1:29:54

Okay.

SPEAKER_14 1:29:55

So now are we going to do weekly testing for Hunter virus? Yeah, weekly testing. This is the stupidest mother effing thing I've ever heard. They're going to do it wrong. Oh my god.

SPEAKER_07 1:30:03

They're going to try to do it. They're going to try to do it. You know, they say the sequel's never as good as the original.

SPEAKER_14 1:30:08

They're going to try to do it. This would be like Shark NATO. Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 1:30:12

This is so bad. This is happening, buddy. This is happening. Hundreds of thousands of articles. Deborah Burks makes an appearance. We need to test people.

SPEAKER_14 1:30:21

We need to shut businesses down and make testing the reason why you can this is all about a virus that a month ago 99% of these people never even heard of. I I've heard of it. My wife is from New Mexico, where hantavirus is a thing, and this is stupid.

SPEAKER_07 1:30:42

I heard about hontavirus when I was pitching an army tent out in the the desert of Boise, and they're like, make sure there aren't any like rodent droppings under your tent, because it could be hontavirus. Right. Like that was it. And you know, when I learned about it ever since then, if I have mouse droppings around, I get out a little bottle of Clorox, I spray it first, then sweep it up. Yeah. Because that's that's the solution. Unless you get unless you move the fecal feces around, it goes airborne. But but this strain, Ron, this strain, yeah, this strain, person to person.

Xi Iran And Religious Zeal

SPEAKER_14 1:31:11

Oh, of course. Yeah. Uh-huh. And that and that is the craziest thing because hontavirus is not person-to-person people. It's not. And they're like, well, there's this one strain that we found somewhere that all of a sudden it's just everywhere in the whole freaking world. Shut up. It's not. Yeah. It's so dumb.

SPEAKER_07 1:31:29

Now, Trump is having a meeting with Xi Jinping this week. This should go pretty well. Um, well, I don't know. I mean, it could go well or bad. I guess we'll see. Hopefully, he comes back. I mean, at this point, it's like don't hold it against the communists not to do something drastic. Trump will be meeting with them.

SPEAKER_04 1:31:46

President Trump will only be in China a short time, landing Wednesday, leaving on Friday. But in that short period of time, the White House is hoping to show a lot of progress on a number of different fronts, as Democrats claim the president's strategy on Iran is not only backfiring, but costly.

SPEAKER_14 1:32:17

We just played a clip of Trump. Did he look weakened to you? Yeah. He has a Ukrainian flag on his lapel.

SPEAKER_28 1:32:23

Right. Holding 20% of the world's oil at risk. China, as you pointed out, is doing quite well because of their alternate energy investments. The president's going to be China's dying. She means dying right now.

SPEAKER_04 1:32:42

Iran is likely to dominate the agenda as China has both political and economic interests in the Middle East. As the Wall Street Journal points out, President Xi also wants the fighting to stop as Middle East turmoil restricts China's oil supply and shrinks the country's ability to buy Chinese goods. Among other issues, the future of Taiwan, where the U.S. sells billions of dollars worth of weapons. And while China sees Taiwan as its own, the U.S. leaves its label a bit more ambiguous.

SPEAKER_00 1:33:08

The Chinese understand our position on that topic. We understand theirs. I think both countries understand that it is neither one of our interests to see anything destabilized happen in that part of the world. We don't need any destabilizing events to occur with regards to Taiwan or anywhere in the Indo-Pacific. And I think that's to the mutual benefit of both the United States and the Chinese.

SPEAKER_04 1:33:28

So as Lucas mentioned in his report, the president rejecting Iran's uh latest counter proposal. We'll see if the president has any more to say today. He will speak on camera a few different points.

UK Labor Collapse And Election Fixes

SPEAKER_07 1:33:37

So the assumption has been that when China wanted Iran to back down, China would Iran would back down because China buys their stuff, they sell them stuff, they buy their oil, and that they would have them under their thumb. Xi Jinping is learning a lesson that communists learned a long time ago. Never underestimate the power of religion and belief. This is why communists and fascists, from Hitler to Stalin to Mussolini, to Pol Pot and to Chairman Mao, all understood that you had to get rid of religion. Even inside of China, they persecute the Uyghur Muslims and they persecute the the Fulong Gong and the Underground Christian Church. Why? Because that religious those religious beliefs can produce something called a martyr. Never underestimate the power of a martyr. When they believe heaven awaits them and the virgins are just on the other side of darkness, you can't always count on them to be good actors and to act in their self-interest. They will literally cut off their nose to spite their face, aka, blow themselves up, die the martyr's death. And so Xi Jinping is finding out that his partners in Iran may not act in his interest or their own interest either. Right? They have a big part of what's going on there. Iran can say uncle at any time, modernize, enter the League of Nations, open the Strait of Hermoods, and probably become very economically viable. They're a great powerful nation with good resources, but they have a mine virus. They have a mine virus. Years ago, a couple years ago, England, Britain, the United Kingdom found out they had an election problem. They had machines that were hackable, and they did a whole there was a huge hubbub over there. They got, I think they completely got rid of the machines, and they've gone to paper ballots. They are a you know a good democracy. Okay. France did the same thing. Their elections do represent their voters. I'm sure there's some buying votes, and I'm sure there's a lot of that little local precinct fraud, but on a whole, their elections are reliable. And what happened last week in in Britain? There was sweeping losses by the Labour Party. Sweeping losses. So bad, in fact, that Keir Starmer is gonna resign.

SPEAKER_35 1:35:58

Well, breaking tonight, Sakir Starmer looks set to resign as Prime Minister in this coming week. I know you've heard it all before, but we've seen huge speculation this evening that suggests the Prime Minister's time has indeed run out. Web Streeting has told Sakir Starmer that he is preparing his case to be the next Prime Minister. The Telegraph has indeed disclosed this evening. Former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has also posted on X this evening demanding that Starmer allows Andy Burnham to return to Westminster. She's also criticized a so-called toxic culture in number 10 and said it might be Labour's last chance to reverse its fortunes. And a couple of hours ago, journalist Dan Hodges has reported that a cabinet minister has informed him that, quote, they believe Keir Starmer will announce he's standing down this week without the need for a contest. He goes on to say that this is the first time he's the first time that they take it serious.

Bitcoin Vs Fiat And Power

SPEAKER_07 1:37:01

There's always been calls for whoever the leader is to resign. But their election, they had overwhelming sweeps. Even in northern Britain, where labor has dominated for like 70 years or since World War II, lost their councils. Big deal. I've said it before, if we can fix the elections, we can flush out a lot of these bad policies and bad politicians. You've got to go to takebackyourcounty.com and get involved on the political side of things because this day is coming. Trump promised us, Trump promised us this election will be fair one way or the other, right? And we'll respect the election if we believe they're fair. Or if they point a gun at our heads and tell us to respect the elections. Carlitz gave us a great stock tip. He said it must be time to buy Moderna and Pfizer stock. If you want to play that game, go ahead. But there's a better solution. And to this extent, this is how we the people take our power back. We have to take our money back. And I've presented over and over again how Bitcoin is a huge tool of this. If you look on the screen, I've got fiat money is backed by guns. And that is the truth. When you understand that fiat means fake, the only way you can get people to accept a colored dollar bill that's worth nothing but an IOU from someone else or even yourself is when they put an army in front of it, which is what we're seeing around the world today. And as as as Marco Rubio said, in five years, we won't even be talking about sanctions, which is how you enforce the dollar. And so the solution is Bitcoin, which is backed by math. It is sound money. Here is Safidian Amos, who wrote the book The Bitcoin Standard. And he explained why Bitcoin or why socialists love fiat systems. So bringing this back home, last week we talked about, or I guess it was two weeks ago on Fridays, last Friday's episode, two weeks, Friday, two Fridays ago, we talked about how socialists view their power as the votes, the ballots. It's not even the people, it's the ballots, right? That's where they get their power. And then they turn around and they abuse the power that money normally represents, an actual store of energy and excess work and excess power. But the truth is, money is the energy, right? Money is the energy. And Bitcoin reverses that. But socialists are going to try to hang on to fiat, fiat as long as they can, because with fiat currency, they can print money and pay vote gatherers to go get illegal ballots. With fiat, they can pay money and they can keep you addicted to the juice, right? Unable to actually fix any real systems because you're dependent on the system, because you don't have real money, a store of value. Fiat enables socialism.

SPEAKER_37 1:39:45

Absolutely. I think it's not a coincidence that the century of, and that's a the century of socialism with the century of fiat, and that is a theme and an important theme in my gold standard uh book. I'm not gonna ruin it, uh, I'm not gonna give you spoilers, but well, maybe I will. But essentially, in that alternative century, socialism and leftism are um uh nowhere to be seen effectively. Because if you look at the history of uh socialism, I mean it exploded and mushroomed all over the world right after World War I. And that's no coincidence. Before World War I, very few people had ever heard of uh Karl Marx, and very few people in places like Russia or China had heard about him. And there's this in insane idea that um these are grassroots movements, it's completely ridiculous. It wasn't it wasn't as if the you know the Russian farmers were reading Karl Marx and realized, all right, and that's it, we figured it out, that's how we fix our lives. It was always an idea that was top down, it was always imposed and financed from the top.

SPEAKER_07 1:40:41

And Karl Marx in his life was unsuccessful at every semi-revolution that he participated in, whether it was the Paris Commune or any others. And the reason was was they couldn't finance their stupid ideas. They couldn't finance them. But they got a huge win in Russia because when you took over Russia, all of a sudden you could enforce the use of their money, which they could create. You could create legal tender. This is what you will use to transact. And with that money, they could then buy the support of the peasants and the farmers who didn't know any better, who thought that that money was real. In 1913, uh Woodrow Wilson, who admired admired the Marxists and was a progressive, which was just the American version of socialism, right? It's just a different term. They admired them and they established the central bank, the Federal Reserve, and then the IRS to create control over the money. This is their tool. This is how they eventually completely won the game in 1933 when they got rid of all gold and silver as money in the United States and implemented the New Deal policy. And then in 1971, when the entire world went off the gold standard, this is why we're in such bad shape as we are today. And you're not gonna fix the system using that system. You can't. And the system itself, while it might want to adopt Bitcoin as a store of value, we the peasants are the ones that are gonna put teeth into it when we start using it. When we start using it, when we are no longer dependent on their fake funny money, we can't be bought off by it anymore. You want to become a powerful grassroots movement, become a wealthy people.

SPEAKER_37 1:42:24

You know, I I get in particular into the history of the Bolsheviks in Russia, and the Bolsheviks were financed by German and American bankers who wanted to bring down the uh tsarist regime. And uh the every socialist movement that has come into power in the 20th century, maybe every is a strong word, but I'm pretty sure that is the case, has always had significant funding from foreign uh sources. It was never an organic movement. You never had this mass movement of a majority of the population reading Karl Marx and then arriving at the conclusion that we need to destroy private property in order to make our country better. It was always people who lusted for power and people who had a lot of money and power and wanted to reinforce their position in society who used these criminal ideas to undermine the uh fundamentals of the society and fundamentals of a social working order, undermine a family, undermine religion, undermine monarchy, and undermine capitalism. And if you undermine all those things, you essentially take away what creates all the basis of human civilization, you return humans to a state of barbarism, and you make them essentially powerless, helpless slaves without capital, without religion, without monarchy, without um family. Without these institutions, we go back to being monkeys in the jungle stinging our feces at each other. And that is essentially what socialism needs to.

SPEAKER_07 1:43:47

Sounds like skid row.

SPEAKER_37 1:43:50

Sounds like skid row. And that is, I think, you know, it's uh it it's as we said, it's heavily intertwined with fiat because, first of all, the creation of a central bank and the destruction of the gold standard is the only way that you can implement those ideas. You need to pay a lot of people to wear the jack boots and go knocking people's doors, confiscate their property, take their gold, shoot them if they resist. That's very expensive, and you can't do that on a gold standard. So you've never had a socialist dictatorship that ran in a gold standard, as far as I can tell. You have to have it with uh fiat money. And it's also the reason I believe why universities in general are always heavily promoting leftist ideas, not all and not at all times, but to a very large degree, a vast majority.

SPEAKER_19 1:44:35

Yeah.

SPEAKER_37 1:44:36

You know, the the 20th century is just always across all disciplines in the social sciences, you always see this heavy emphasis on Marxist ideas and leftist and progressive ideas and all these different flavors of the same shit, essentially. And the reason for that is that these ideas help people to um help people in power. The people in power like those ideas. You know, it's it it it and it works perfectly because it is packaged in uh the rhetoric of helping the poor, helping the downtrodden, helping the farmers and the workers, and so on. But all that it does is it destroys those people's lives to the benefits of the people who come to power and the people who have the resources. And so that's why fiat is so popular with socialists, and that's why socialism is so popular with fiats. Absolutely.

SPEAKER_04 1:45:20

I mean, it's not a coincidence that the fifth tenant of the communist manifesto is a necessity for the centralization of credit.

SPEAKER_07 1:45:28

It's a tenant of the manifesto, the centralization of credit, aka the central bank, and in America we call our central bank the Federal Reserve. The only thing federal about it is the name itself. Nothing else is and by the way, the the word federal means by agreement. So it's the reserve by agreement, not because it has intrinsic value, not because it has utility, not because it is a legitimate store of energy, it's our capital by agreement. And how do you enforce that agreement? Bullets, which is where you enter into the oppression that socialism always ends up pushing. Because the only way you can get people to agree to that reserve value that's fake is with force and with ins with incentive, punishment and carrots.

SPEAKER_14 1:46:23

That's what the IRS does. So if we could get rid of the Second Amendment, we could be full socialists, finally.

SPEAKER_07 1:46:28

Finally. Then people can't fight back. We don't have to have any kind of fiscal policy at all. But you think about the little protest on the street corner, which was paid by NGOs, right? And you talk and you go listen to Burkhardt explain how that works. You get some NGO that opens up, save the kitties, and then some rich person go puts a million dollars in there of money that's fake, and then the government goes, Oh, it's a legitimate charity. Let's give them a grant for a hundred million dollars and they'll do more good. So all those people standing on the corner protesting against really our better interests paid by the funny money. Socialism requires fake money to pay for the jackboots to kick in your door, to pay for the protesters, to pay for those people because the ideas don't work, the ideas aren't popular, and it would be incredibly expensive, an incredible investment of capital with no return if you had a sound money system. Yeah. A local news channel in Ohio wanted to understand Bitcoin. There was a local financial planner who was trying to dissuade his clients from investing in Bitcoin. What's Bitcoin? Bitcoin's nothing. It's whatever, it's fake, it's whatever you think it's worth. It's not worth anything, it's it's garbage. And they did a little newscast. And this financial planner was stunned by what he discovered about Bitcoin.

SPEAKER_13 1:47:50

Another record set today by the price of Bitcoin. How many of you understand it? I don't. I can't teach you about it, but today I talked with a financial advisor who believes you need to learn more about it. Ray House to watches the financial station for a Bitcoin price. There it is right there.

SPEAKER_10 1:48:10

92.6, 92,600. Another record-setting day. I absolutely advise everybody to do your homework on it, to research this. It is something that you need to know and learn about.

SPEAKER_13 1:48:23

Ray House dew is a financial advisor. He was a doubter at first on Bitcoin, but he studied it, finding a paper which explained the blockchain technology Bitcoin is based on.

SPEAKER_10 1:48:34

And I I read that and I was blown away by it because I just wanted to find a reason to tell people this was garbage. And I couldn't.

SPEAKER_13 1:48:41

House dew can't say whether you should buy it or not. Every person's situation is different. He believes demand for Bitcoin right now is based on two things. The SEC approved it for exchange traded products, and Donald Trump embracing digital assets. House two believes Bitcoin has proven that it's here to stay.

SPEAKER_34 1:49:47

Hi everyone, I'm Lindsay Watson. Thanks for watching.

Private Segment Setup On Redistricting

Louisiana Map Emergency Explained

SPEAKER_07 1:49:53

Yep. Gotta get to understand it. I like this little meme here. You can put this on the screen. So here's the flowchart. When people are asking about Bitcoin, do you have money? Yes, buy Bitcoin. No. Do you have a job? Yes. Study Bitcoin and then buy Bitcoin. Do you have money not for Bitcoin? Study Bitcoin, then buy Bitcoin. Do you have a job? No. Find a job. Study Bitcoin. Buy Bitcoin. It's a great chart. All roads lead to buy Bitcoin. All roads lead to buy Bitcoin. All roads lead to buy Bitcoin. Tomaste on YouTube commented yesterday or this weekend. He goes, listening to your podcast. Pretty soon you're going to be a Bitcoin podcast. I'm like, you already are. Bitcoin is a powerful way for we the peasants to take our power back. It's not just an investment. It's not a tech stock. No, it's not as good as probably the returns that Moderna and Pfizer are going to have if this hantavirus thing really picks up, right? But uh in 30 minutes, I have my first auto withdrawal for Bitcoin auto purchase. Congratulations, Dad. Put it in a trust and leave it to us when you go. Make sure you don't let those keys die with you when you leave. All right. So Bitcoin is one of the fundamental things that you can do, that you can do, whether or not you want to get involved in the in the nitty-gritty sausage making of politics. If you want to get to that, you go to take backyourcounty.com and get involved in political activism, go to political remodel.com, download the manuscript, and understand what we're going to be doing over there. But regardless of if you choose to get involved at that degree, if you're a small business owner, if you're an employee, save Bitcoin. It's an incredible investment opportunity. But more than that, it's a counterbalance to the socialist communist money system we call fiat. Fiat means fake, a canard, a farce. And they can only get you to believe it's real when they incentivize you with force. Take that power away from them, hold them accountable. All right, guys, we're going to jump over to private and we're going to be talking about the redistricting battle. Governor Jeff Landry from Louisiana, who was just informed that their state's congressional districts are unconstitutional, has to field questions as to why they can't just proceed with the unconstitutional districts in an act of pure retardism from the uh reporter. And then we're going to talk about how the map looks for Republicans going forward. So this is really important. We are on the verge. This is a big year. Trump's trying to fight it from the high end to fix our elections. Hopefully, we see some machine reform. We've already got the Postal Service that's going to do special barcode, QR codes on ballots to make sure we know where the ballots can't go and when they come back. We've got highlighted awareness of ballot harvesting, mail-in voting, all of these things. He's trying to fix that structural problem. But the courts, believe it or not, have fixed the gerrymandering in favor of the Democrats by saying no more racial districts. Those are unconstitutional, which has created a flood of Republican states who have these minority-majority districts, these giveaways to the Democrats are redistricting. And already the map is looking a lot more favorable for Republicans in 2020. So stick around with us on private. If you're not a Rumble subscription member, please consider joining. And uh we oh, tomorrow we are going to do our May 9th, we're going to do our tip campaign. We're going to do our return. I forgot that the ninth was on a weekend. Sorry. But we're going to do that tomorrow. And the top donor, believe it or not, identified himself to us. Thank you very much. And he said, I don't want a kickback. Give it to the next guy. So what a rollover. Any of you who are listening now, you just go to Rumble, click on the Rumble Wallet link. If you want to know how to get Bitcoin, you can use river.com. Ron the link is in the show notes. You don't have to put it in the chats. We're just wrapping that up. It's in the show notes. You can do that. It's the easiest way to buy Bitcoin. And then you do send Bitcoin, send it on the Lightning Network, and then go grab the link off our Rumble wallet on here, copy paste it in, boom, send. It's that easy. Peer-to-peer transaction. So with that, we'll jump over to private and we'll talk some redistricting. Phew. There we go. All right. So this is Governor Jeff Landry being asked about the unconstitutional districts. In the United States, we get equal rights.

SPEAKER_09 1:54:36

No one gets extra rights.

SPEAKER_24 1:54:39

This past Tuesday, we went to Baton Rouge and met Governor Jeff Landry at the Governor's Mansion. A close ally of President Trump, he dominates Louisiana politics. The colorful conservative Cajun was the state's attorney general before winning the top job in 2023.

SPEAKER_09 1:54:58

You cannot say that we are all created equal and that states must treat everyone equal under the law and then allow a law to sort people based upon race.

SPEAKER_24 1:55:08

Following the Supreme Court decision, Governor Landry declared a state of emergency and abruptly suspended congressional house primaries right as voting was starting, ordering a do-over at a future date, leaving voters dazed and confused. What exactly is the emergency?

SPEAKER_09 1:55:29

We've got the highest court in the land says the map that you have is unconstitutional, so we don't have a map under which our voters can vote on.

SPEAKER_24 1:55:40

This country has held elections during the Civil War, during two world wars. Elections still went on. We don't have an election.

SPEAKER_07 1:55:48

Well, those didn't create legal illegalities, right? Those were just crises. An emergency though they may be, it didn't affect the election. The Supreme Court said your map is unconstitutional. So if you use it, would that not be a violation of the constitution?

SPEAKER_09 1:56:07

And we're actually gonna have an election on election day.

SPEAKER_24 1:56:10

But voting was already happening as we sit here right now. Uh more than forty-five thousand ballots have been returned. What happens to those?

SPEAKER_09 1:56:18

Oh, those ballots are discarded, and those voters will vote again in November. You say that like it's not a big deal. Well, it's it's not a big deal. It's not my fault. Go if if anybody has a grievance, take it to the United States Supreme Court.

SPEAKER_07 1:56:31

And the United States Supreme Court said, yep, still unconstitutional. So CNN's pretty upset about this map. They're they're not liking what they're seeing.

SPEAKER_21 1:56:41

It's possible now. The math is much more interesting for Republicans if all this plays out.

SPEAKER_32 1:56:46

So the fight over these congressional seats does not dictate, of course, the results in November, as you're noted, as you're noting, voters will still because we could still steal it. Have the final say.

SPEAKER_21 1:56:56

That's why I want to go back to this because I just showed you the Texas map. Texas Republicans think they get plus five. Voters get the final say. That Texas map, and I'm just using Texas as an example, is based on you see these blue areas down here. Those are Latino seats, largely Latino majority populations. Republicans said, oh, they voted for Trump and Republicans in 2024. Maybe they'll stay with us. When they drew the lines, they were counting on that. We have seen a lot of those Latinos in 2020. Look at that district that goes from Laredo all the way up, this little tiny finger all the way up into Austin. So the Republicans have put a heavy thumb, maybe even a foot on the scale, but the voters still get the final say. And Jay, Jake, you know, look, this helps the Republicans. Don't get me wrong. Virginia coming off the board and those southern states continuing to move forward helps the Republican math. But it makes a bad situation, makes a horrible situation a little less worse. This is what will decide the election. It's decided every midterm election since I've been alive. Here's the president in 2018. He was at 41% at this point, fell to 39%. They lost 40 seats. This is where he is right now. He is historically low. We don't know where he's going to be in November there. But can the Republicans, the Republicans now, they have a money advantage. Now they have a bit of a map advantage. Can they really keep this to five or 10 seats? That's the challenge. History says no, but Republicans are in better shape today than they were yesterday. All right. And they can thank the Virginia.

SPEAKER_07 1:58:15

They got the money. They got the map. They got the law. Man, Ron, I mean, you think. But then again, you know, Democrats don't need the law. Or judges or a couple Republicans in Texas apparently don't need the law either. They'll just buy their votes. Literally. Six, five to eight dollars a vote.

SPEAKER_14 1:58:32

They can just there's a lady out there that'll get them for you. Their words, not mine.

Gerrymandering Lawsuit Scenarios

SPEAKER_07 1:58:37

That is a piece, a corrupt PCO, is what that is. You want to be a counterbalance to that? Go become a PCO somewhere. So this is Carl Higby on Newsmax covering this as well from a Republican perspective. Powerful stuff. Things could really change. The election, we could flush out a lot of these bad politicians. We've got to say no to the retard right, though.

SPEAKER_08 1:58:58

What's so funny here is that the Democrats are now suing the Republican states, citing, oh, it's gerrymandering. They can't sue under the Voting Rights Act anymore, thanks to the Supreme Court for overturning that one. So they're now saying this is like partisan gerrymandering. This is bananas. I say go ahead and sue. Here's what's going to happen. Because of the multitude of the number of states that are involved in this, it will have judicial prudence to go to the Supreme Court very, very quickly, which no matter how they decide, this is like the best win for Republicans. Let me explain both scenarios here. This is actually amazing. See, Democrats have been doing all kinds of catty wampus gerrymandering for decades, like what they tried to do in VA. They're pretty much already maxed out on their ability to do any more, but Republicans haven't. So if the Libs want to sue and cry, oh, Republicans are gerrymandering, and let's say on some weird happenstance that the Supreme Court agrees with them and strikes down Republican gerrymandering, say in Florida, where they just redistricted things and picked up another four Republican seats. Like, best case scenario, maybe in a stretch, the court might find like one of the new Florida districts to be unfair. But then, and this is where it gets fun, it just takes one Republican with a pair to say, okay, now let's apply the same standard to every Democrat state. Let's start with their Death Star Liberal's home base, California, that has gerrymandered nearly 20 seats around every major liberal city. We'll pick Los Angeles. Just a few. I mean, look at this one. Look, if Florida was theoretically ever struck down, then all these would likely have to change too because it looks like a drunk five-year-old's finger painting. Republicans pick up three, five, seven seats out of California because three miles outside of any city in Cali, bright red. I mean, look at this. Bright red, but why stop there? How about let's take a trip up to Washington State in and around Seattle? Look at this weird thing here. This is just so they can put the city into the rural area. I mean, one can also deduct that would also not be allowed either. They could lose two in a stretch, maybe three districts out of Washington to Republicans. Oregon, again, redraw that stuff too. Another two seats, probably. I mean, what is this? I could do this all day. Illinois. So look at this state. This is incredible. What even is that? Looks like the the finger lakes for congressional districts. Congressional districts shouldn't look like a dog leg par five at Augusta. Like I'd be willing to bet that Pritzker loses there too. Congressional districts, not pounds. But we're just getting warmed up. You libs want to open Pandora's box? Let's do New Hampshire. Let's actually do all of New England, where despite over 40% of this region voting for Donald Trump, there are approximately zero Republican Congress seats in there. Let's do some work. I got an axe to grind with my home state. So let's do that one first. Connecticut. Check this out. It's like a boot, it's like a Tetris piece for a congressional district. Looks like a hammer. They did that to keep all this farmland red rural area. Put that into Hartford and dilute it into the deep blue crime-ridden city. Nix that box around Hartford. Both East and West sides of the states will almost certainly have red districts, and Connecticut will pick up two Republican seats. Same with Massachusetts. You cut out the homeless fentanyl-ridden cities and all their weird stuff they got going in there. Get the rural to the rural. Probably another two to three seats. I mean, look at how weird some of these are. You know what's funny, too. Massachusetts is actually more red than Tennessee is blue. That's right. Massachusetts voted 36% Republican, has zero Republican congressmen, yet Tennessee only voted only 34% Democrat and has had one Democrat seat. And then when Republicans decided to level the playing field, the Libs started crying. But hey, fair is fair. You can't have it both ways, Dems. But the best part about Tennessee, so hilarious. While Gavin Newsom says that Confederate states are rushing through rigged maps to erase black districts off the map. Dude, the woman who's likely to win Tennessee 9, which is the new district down there, is a black female Republican rather than a white male Democrat who currently holds the seat. You cannot make this up. But let's let's okay. What if the court rules the other way? Actually, Florida, Tennessee, Missouri, or whatever, they say those states are fine. Totally legal, you can do whatever you want. Also great. Because guess what? Let's do more. Twenty three states in America have Republican trifects. To Democrats, only 16. Meaning that one party controls all three: the state house, the state senate, and the governorship. And like I said, libs are maxed out with their gerrymandering. Republicans, the work, baby. But if they I we saw this from Indiana, okay? You gotta do it. Because if you don't do it in those Republican states, we're just gonna primary the hell out of you. And then probably do it anyway. And Republicans will have the House for the next hundred years. And Democrats will be screaming at buildings because they didn't get their way. Or they will now have to compete on the field of ideas and policy rather than on gerrymandering districts full of homeless people, illegals, drug addicts, and hopelessly overeducated socialists. Wouldn't that be something?

SPEAKER_07 2:04:48

You know, I gotta say to the dedicated, unoffendables who stick around with with us on private. It's amazing when you have a peasant's perspective how the news all ties together and makes sense. From the very beginning, the hopelessly overeducated liberals who allow the drug use, the illegal immigration, the rampant crime, the fraud, the abuse, how they're the ones who benefit from this because they have a job because their ideas result in that every time. And they blame the conservative, the opposition. Well, we just can't go full retard yet. So until we go full retard, we won't know if our ideas were actually retarded. We assume that it's all a half measure because there's some element of conservatism holding us back. Again, to the Republicans that think that the way you win elections is by working with the people on the other side of the aisle. You're retarded. You can't work with a suicide bomber. That's what they're doing. You can't work with people that have genuinely bad ideas. They might have bleeding hearts and great people. But do you think Nancy Pelosi allows a homeless encampment in her front yard? She has a big one. She'll let a guy with a hammer in the front door. No homeless encampments. It all ties together. Fix the money, take away the incentives, make it hard for them to gen up fake support and pay people off and fix the election apparatus. And conservatism will actually get a chance to restore what was once what made our country great. And that's the point of MAGA. Not to go retard right or liberal extreme, it's to come back to actual conservative values. All right, guys, that's it for us today. Thanks for sticking around. We will talk to you again tomorrow.

SPEAKER_27 2:07:11

I'm twenty-five. Well, I can't just call him Matt. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. I did say something about the old woman. But from behind you, the old woman could be treating me like an imperialist. Well king. How do you get that? Hanging on to our stated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Is there ever going to be any progress? How do you do, good lady? I'm after King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. The Britons. We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. No, you're the king. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictator. Stop perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes are. That's what it's all about. Please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives in that castle. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of pure internal affairs. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of quiet. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake. Signifying big province. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women, nothing in pounds, distributed swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some flashical aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to worry about supreme executive power. Just because some water retrofort is all emperor. Just because some motion bites a symmetry.