Why The Law Sounds Hard And How To Decode It

The fastest way to lose your freedom is to be convinced you can’t understand the rules. We start with a deceptively simple claim from Justice Clarence Thomas: law isn’t mystical, it’s just been made to feel that way, like The Wizard of Oz. When legal language turns into a private code, regular citizens get pushed to the curb, and the people who “translate” the system gain power. We talk through what plain-English law would look like, why confusing ballot language is a feature not a bug, and how demystifying process is the first step to participating again.

Then we bring it down to earth with a story that perfectly captures modern government: a newlywed builds a tree house on family land, gets whiplash from shifting county rules, and ends up paying real money for “invisible lines” on a survey just to satisfy an ordinance sequence. From there we zoom out into institutions, ideology, and enforcement, including how political movements recruit loyalty, how labels like “terrorist” get deployed, and why the people behind the curtain are often just normal functionaries with outsized leverage.

We close by connecting the same themes to the economy: Supreme Court fights over firing power inside federal agencies, election integrity arguments and the Save America Act, and the next financial framework forming around crypto, Bitcoin, and AI-scale infrastructure. We dig into inflation, the Federal Reserve feedback loop, and the uneasy question of where “trillions in investment” actually come from, especially when leaders point to pensions, savings, and insurance pools. If you want clearer thinking about power, policy, and your money, subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with the one rule or regulation you wish someone would finally explain in plain English.

Transcript

Cold Open And Peasants Welcome

SPEAKER_14 0:33

It's a little gun. It's a little gun take the little everyone. Peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. Yes. It's always fun when we open up the show and we get through the intro and there's nobody. Just us watching. It is always the best feeling. It makes me feel so amazing. So good morning, Ron. I just texted. Good morning, Taylor. You won! You got the first in the chat. Yes. Every day, 6 30 a.m., except for the times when we don't are not on time.

SPEAKER_15 1:25

Did we have a competition for that? Did I win anything?

SPEAKER_14 1:27

Oh, you did today. You did today, that's for sure. All right. Well, I mean, I don't know. Should we do the simultaneous sip? Ron, it's just us here. Wait a second.

SPEAKER_15 1:35

I'm pretty thirsty.

SPEAKER_14 1:36

We always want to like look at the well, it's probably the technology there. There's probably like a holdup on the internet traffic jam somewhere on an Oracle server. Oh, Pony Boy, you made it. Pony Boy made it. Good morning. One of the shorts that I clipped was me talking about how the show's not growing. And then at the end, I blame censorship. I'm like checking.

SPEAKER_16 1:58

Well, notice how Pony Boy was able to chat, but his numbers aren't showing up.

SPEAKER_14 2:02

Yeah, see, that's what makes it so something weird's going on. Now Rumble's trying to cheese out of our hat. That's what it is. I'm sure of it. I'm sure of it. All right. Yeah, that is weird that Pony Boy's not showing up, unless it's just him watching. The most dedicated listener of all. It's a software between Pony Boy and Fraser. Let's see. Nope. Still one. Still just one. All right. Well, we'll stop whining about our low show performance. Speaking of, we need 75 chatters this much. So if uh you could just tell all your friends and everyone you know at church this time to get on to the show, that would be great. And I know why everybody shows up bright and early, at least Pony Boy.

The Simultaneous Sip Ritual

SPEAKER_14 2:48

You show up for the simultaneous sip, and all you need for that is a cup or a mug, a glass, a tackard, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, jugger, flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip, and it starts right now.

SPEAKER_03 3:07

And the guys, it's been one punch. Yeah. And they're like, ah, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, nobody fights anymore. Right. But um, right. We told our boys that if you guys can fight, yeah, but when you're done, you have to kiss the makeup on the mouth. Okay, I like that. And it ended everything. How about that? Who thought of that? Kelly.

unknown 3:31

Okay.

SPEAKER_03 3:31

Uh-oh. That's so good. I was like, Where'd you get that? Really?

SPEAKER_14 3:35

Yes.

SPEAKER_32 3:36

Like, well done. Well done.

SPEAKER_14 3:37

Just for reference for those listening on audio, that's Michelle Obama's brother. What? And if you make boys who fight kiss each other at the end on the mouth, that makes them gay. Yeah. That makes them gay. At the end, at the very end of the clip, he's like, Yeah, it fixed everything. It didn't happen anymore after that. And I was like, I know, because the boys don't want to be gay. Yeah, exactly. Like their dad, apparently. Anyways, I was just thought that was kind of funny. I'd make him kiss him on the mouth. It's like, no wonder we have such a messed up country if these are the people who are running the place. That was the former first later there. Her brothers talk about making his boys kiss each other

Clarence Thomas On Plain English

SPEAKER_14 4:14

on the mouth. Justice Clarence Thomas sat down for an interview, and this is after the release of the decisions this week. And this was a really good interview. And he says something in this interview that I just think is absolutely critical for us as peasants to understand. My walkthrough life has allowed me to step behind the curtain a couple of times. I got to see behind the curtain in the mortgage industry. I got to see behind the curtain in the real estate industry, the contracting industry, the septic engineering industry, got the little bit behind the scenes on the insurance industry, right? I got to see behind the scenes in the prison industrial complex, the judicial system. That's what life has been for me is a lot of walking behind the curtain and meeting the wizard, right? What makes this entire thing kind of have this illusion of grandiosity and stability and whatever it is? And at the end of the day, most of what's in the world around us is held together by baling wire or duct tape and willpower, right? It's just kind of what holds holds the world together. So this is Justice Clarence Thomas saying the law is no different than that.

SPEAKER_31 5:16

Let me back up. You did you see The Wizard of Oz? Yes. Okay, who was a wizard? Who was the wizard? It was that little guy. It was a little guy. I could have said that. Yeah. So I think what we do sometimes is we make everything mysterious. Don't look behind the curtain. Yeah, we should look behind the curtain. That's what we do in our class. It's not mysterious. Look at the there was a young man in our constitutional law class at the end. He said, I'll never look at law the same again. I don't know what his leanings were. I don't care what his ideology is. What we were trying to get him to do is demystify it. It's not that complicated. Why do we make it complicated? Why do we make it inaccessible? I had a buddy who's a quadruple legic, he's one of my best friends. And this is in the days back in the 70s before you had all these flushed curbs and curb cuts. So every time we got to like a curb, it was like the Great Wall of China. And we would have to, if we weren't there to lift him over, lift him downstairs and things, he was it was inaccessible to him. And some to some extent, that's what we do to law. We start talking about negative pregnants and dub, we use double entendres and throwing a little Latin and a little this. Why don't we talk in English? You know, that farmer in rural Alabama has a right to know what his constitution says. And so what I do is one of the things I say, and I've said even when you were clerking, is that genius is not putting a $20 um a 10 cent idea in a $20 sentence. Genius is putting a $20 idea in a 10 cent sentence. It is to make it accessible as possible to average people. So when I used to go back home, think about it. I came from a world of illiteracy or near illiteracy. And when you went back home, you could not talk down to people. That's what they would say to you. They wouldn't use the word condescend. That wasn't in their vocabulary. You're talking down to me. In other words, you're putting me down. But you have to explain things to them without treating them like they're lesser human beings. So you it's what we used to say in the vernacular back in the 60s, you had to break it down. In other words, you have to speak without losing meaning, without losing content, you have to explain it in a language that they understood. And and the I think one of the things that we try to do in the opinions is to explain things to people. I think we owe it to people. In order to do that, we have to know it as we do in the classes. Look at the eyes on the students when we're done. When they figure out that they know more about locker now than they did before, simply because we've read all the briefs and articles about it, etc., and we know the story behind it. And all of a sudden they can claim it. They understand it makes sense. Or if you look when I wrote separately in the McDonnell opinion, what I was trying to do is after all this talk of substantive due process, just simply explain to people. We don't know where it where does it come from? Where does it come from? It's not in the Constitution. But so you go back and you say, here's what's there. Now you don't have to agree, but Provisor Immunities Clause is actually there. Here's what they actually debated. And you can disagree with that, but you can see the coherence. You can see you can go back, go to you can go to Dred Scott, and you can see that it was, you know, like Tawny is saying, blacks can't be citizens. Well, that's remedied in the 14th Amendment. And then it says you can't deny the privilege or immunities of citizenship. It all makes sense once you go through the history. And I think that's what I tried to do in the opinions. It's not so much to give you some legal theory, but to give you the progress of these of this provision. And then to show you where it's connected to some of the other uh concerns they had about blacks in the South being able to defend themselves.

SPEAKER_14 9:32

So he goes on to continue to talk about kind of the details of some of these different little cases. But what he's explaining there is when you break it down, when you actually understand it, you realize that a lot of these decisions are just in sequence, right? Like, well, if blacks don't have citizenship, then we have the Dred Scott decisions. And we retroactively look back and go, look how racist they were. And it's like, no, that they had no other choice but to decide that way. They had to remedy the problem of citizenship for the blacks through the 14th Amendment. Everything's like that. It doesn't matter if you go down to your local building department or go wherever, there's a series of decisions that were made. There was a problem in the community, so they made a rule or regulation. And now that rule or regulation is being overapplied or misapplied or applied in situations that have nothing to do with how the rule was created. And the burden ends up being on us, the higher functionaries.

SPEAKER_16 10:25

He also said something else. He talked about something else that was really important to me. And it's something that I think I brought up about six years ago. Uh, and and what I said was please talk to me and explain it to me like I'm a five-year-old. And and he's saying the same thing here. We owe it to the American people to explain it to them, not talking down to them, but talking to them in a way that they can understand it. Be so overly um uh I don't know what the right word is, but yes, keep it simple, stupid. Yes, and and and I want to apply this especially to like voting when it comes to. I mean, everybody's read a voter pamphlet, and you read like the first initiative. If you want to vote no to the passing of the whatever, and it's like vote yes, yeah, it's like triple double weird speak that nobody can understand if they're even voting for or against a thing, because it's written like with triple double entendres.

SPEAKER_14 11:27

It's written meant to be kind of it's meant to be confusing. But the law, the ultimate message here is the law is supposed to do a good thing, right? Yeah, like all law is supposed to accomplish some matter of justice or equality or equity or some principle that's behind it.

SPEAKER_16 11:42

Right, and this is especially important when it gets into the courts because then they start just like he was uh describing there. Well, we sprinkle in some Latin and we sprinkle in a bunch of other words that nobody understands, and then all the legal guys we figure it out and make the laws.

SPEAKER_14 11:58

Yes, and the message here though, it's when you actually boil it down, despite the Latin phraseology, despite the legal eas, sure, it's just a short fat man behind a curtain.

SPEAKER_16 12:10

That's right. He has no real clue what's well that's what I'm saying is that they use all this to create separation and act like you can't participate because you don't know the right magic spell.

SPEAKER_14 12:21

Exactly. That's all it is, it's a magic spell. There's nothing really intrinsic about it. So I want to show you an example of this in action. How the short fat man behind the curtain, the wizard of oz, manipulates things and creates rules and regulations. And then downstream, people seem to be idiots about it, right? Whatever it is you're trying to protect, whatever good you're trying to do for the quote unquote public, you fail to do it. Okay.

Tree House Permits And Invisible Lines

SPEAKER_14 12:47

This is one of my friends, Bruno Kua. He's a January 6er. In fact, his claim to fame is he was the youngest January 6er arrested. He was 18 when he was arrested. He lives down in Georgia. I'm very good friends with his parents. And this is their property down in Georgia, and he decided to build a tree house a number of years ago. Now, this was an interesting story. He went in to get permission to build the tree house. He built the tree house, and then the county came back and said, Oh my gosh, that's not a tree house, that's a house. And they forced him to get permits and engineering, and they've sent him on this incredibly multi-year, very difficult chase to get water connected and power, and then they had the power shut off, and then they wouldn't give another occupancy. And they had to go to like they just thing after thing after thing. They finally got the tree house built, they finally got the water hooked up, they finally got the power hooked up, and now all he wants to do is move in it with his wife. Okay, he just is a newly married man, he wants to move in it. Now, this property is multiple hundreds of acres, and they'd also like to build another house on the property. Okay, and that's where we pick up the story.

SPEAKER_10 13:49

The government won't let me live in this tree house that I spent the last four years building, and the reason is incredibly stupid. As we already established, the county said I could build a tree house, and the county seats changed, and the new guy said, Hey, no, never mind, you need a permit for that. And that turned into like a year and a half battle, and they didn't want to give us a permit. And when they finally did give us a permit, they said, Okay, fine, you can build it, but you need to make it bigger up to 1200 square feet to meet our minimum size requirements, you know, so we can tax you more. So we got the permit, and now there's a new problem. Now they say that my parents cannot build a house on the same property, which is over a hundred acres, by the way, because now the tree house is the primary residence. So we can't do another house. So we meet with the county again, and we're like, hey, so the tree house is still only 750 square feet. We have not made it bigger, which means it meets your size requirements for an accessory structure. So we should still be able to build a main house over there. Nope, that's impossible. Why is that impossible? Well, because their ordinance strictly prohibits building the accessory structure before the main house, because then people just never build the main house. Yeah, but we're actually trying to build the main house, like right now. We're we're trying to build it, but you're saying no. So we go in circles and circles, and they're just like, sorry, it's impossible. You cannot build another house in the property. So my dad's like, well, can we just apply for a variance? And he's like, Yeah, you can, but they'll definitely deny it. And then I found a loophole. I said to him, I said, Why don't we just divide the property on paper, draw an invisible line down the middle, and then my parents can pull a permit for this property, build their main house, and when they finish, we can reassemble the properties and the tree house becomes an accessory structure to the main house. Well, yeah, I guess I guess that could work, but you can't get a certificate of occupancy for your tree house until your parents' house is finished. Which means I can't live in it. Because in 2026, you need the government's permission to live in a house that you built. So we had to pay surveyors thousands of dollars to draw invisible lines across the property so that my parents can build on the exact same property. And then when they finish, we will pay them thousands more dollars to erase the invisible lines and put the properties back together. Otherwise, I have to nearly double the size of the tree house. So, in summary, I can't live in the tree house because it's an legal structure and it's not big enough. But if I make it bigger, then it's okay. But also now it's too big, so now my parents can't build a house over here. But if I draw an invisible line here, then they can build a house over here. But I still have to make the tree house bigger. Unless I erase the invisible line after my parents' house is done, then the tree house is okay. But I I still can't live in it until my parents' house is done because you can't build the accessory structure first, according to the city ordinance, even though it's already done. So I guess my wife and I will just keep living in this leaky mold invested camper. And what makes this even more interesting is that they tried to jack up the property tax bill this year because they claimed that the tree house was done and that we were living in it. But we also don't have a CO and we're not allowed to live in it. So which is it? Make it make sense. I'll pay the freaking increased property tax because we just live in a stupid house. The comments are gonna say, bro, just live in it anyway. How will they know? All that being said, my hope is that when my parents actually break ground, which should be in the next couple of months, I can convince them to give me the CEO and I can actually move in. I feel like that's a perfectly reasonable request. We're not trying to cheat the system, we're not trying to work around the rules. We've got a main house and an accessory house. That's all we're trying to do here. But they're making us go run around in circles and waste a ton of money on invisible lines. Anyway, stay tuned to see how this story develops.

SPEAKER_14 16:39

And the man behind the curtain is chuckling. So basically, there's nothing wrong with having a house and a tree house. It's just how we get to have a house and a tree house. We've got to pay for invisible lines.

SPEAKER_16 16:54

As this guy's invisible lines. As this guy was just going on and on and on. And I was thinking to myself, like, man, this is your whole job.

SPEAKER_14 17:01

This is all you do.

SPEAKER_16 17:02

That's what I was gonna say. It's like people can finally see what it's like inside my head 24 hours a day. All you do.

SPEAKER_14 17:10

Hey, I'd like to build a house. Oh, it can't be done. How do we convince the county to let you do the thing that they're going to let you do, anyways? It's like how much how many loopholes? So if you do it this way, we can sign off on it. Why can't you just sign off on it? Right. Why don't we pretend we did a lot line revision and then a lot line re-revision? I can tell you exactly why, Taylor. It's the process. Well, because then our paperwork won't be filled out completely. It's not a mystery. It's not a mystery why things are retarded. Right? This is what Justin's Clarence Thomas is trying to say. Exactly. There's a construct to it, right? It's not like it has to be this way. It's this way because we made a series of decisions and we're the only ones who can fix those decisions. Now, this is incredibly difficult in an environment where the man behind the curtain might not even be back there. Oh, dang it. So we have certain people that are incredibly influential in the system.

McConnell Missing And Power Vacuums

SPEAKER_14 18:06

These are old bulls. Like, for example, Mitch McConnell is one of these old bulls, right? He carries an incredible amount of influence in the Senate. He carries he has controls an incredible amount of PAC money. And he's missing an action, Ron.

SPEAKER_13 18:19

We are just now learning that Senator Mitch McConnell is still in the hospital. That, according to a spokesperson for the former Senate leader, it comes as NBC News learns that paramedics said CPR on somebody experiencing cardiac arrest at Senator McConnell's home on June 14th, the day that he was hospitalized. Fire EMS dispatch right there. And according to the audio, the first medic who arrived to McConnell's house started giving somebody CPR before another EMS team arrived on the scene as well.

SPEAKER_14 19:03

We are just now I would consider that pretty serious. So it's now July 3rd, and we've not heard from Mitch McConnell since June 14th. Pretty incredible. So the man behind the curtain is missing in action. Why can't we get anything done in the Senate? Well, Mitch can't give his approval. It's like the whole thing revolves

Minnesota Group Chat Terror Charges

SPEAKER_14 19:23

around him. Now you remember up in Minnesota, there were the 15 quote-unquote domestic terrorists who were arrested. Which was we played the clip of the one woman who's like, I've never done anything bad in my life, and all I was on was a group chat. Okay. So these guys got arrested and they got arranged yesterday. The 15 radical terrorists from Minnesota left the courthouse making the communist fist gesture after they pled, they all pled not guilty. The evidence against these terrorists is overwhelming, including terabytes of data retrieved from their signal chat group, social media posts and video, and over a thousand videos that were submitted to prosecutors. So this is a picture of them walking out of the courthouse yesterday.

SPEAKER_16 19:59

Okay. How do we know that Oh, I see.

SPEAKER_14 20:02

I just want you to pay attention here. There's not a minority amongst them.

SPEAKER_16 20:06

I was gonna say, how do we know that that's what they're doing, but I guess we know now. What the heck, man?

SPEAKER_26 20:18

Empower the people.

SPEAKER_14 20:24

This is like any shopping mall in Washington.

SPEAKER_16 20:26

You know what I'm saying? Like, I guess we can put our hands down now.

SPEAKER_14 20:30

It's just normal. There's the weapon sending. So the reason I'm playing this is because I remember when I got to prison, one of the things that the January Sixers did to show solidarity was we sang the national anthem every night, right? We put on team colors, is essentially what I'm saying. We put on the colors of the nation and we wanted that support. Well, these guys, by coming out of the courthouse and making that fist, what are they doing? They're looking for the support of who? The communists, the revolutionaries. They're rallying to come to their aid and support. Now, what's really sad about this is if we sat down and had lunch with any one of these people, we'd probably have 90% of our lives in common. We just have a different political ideology. Hey man, the brisket's good. The brisket's good. Yeah, it is. You know, I'm a vegan though. Yeah, it's a brisket. So we have that this is just one of those things where I look at this and I go, like, it's what you said the other day. Like, that could that's you, you know, that woman right there with that green blue dress or whatever with the red hair. Yeah, that's me. You know, it's like I've never been in trouble before, got involved in a group chat. Like, I don't know. I haven't read the post. I don't know how vile they are, I don't know how threatening they were. I have no idea. Yeah, I have no idea. And these guys obviously stepped forward, took action, went into the church, just like we stepped forward, took action, walked onto the Capitol lawn. Like, I get it. There's a technical violation here. I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of calling them terrorists at this stage. You know what I'm saying? Like, yeah, that they're they're terrorists by some very weak, shallow definition of the word.

SPEAKER_16 21:55

They're also probably American cost.

SPEAKER_14 21:58

But they're also probably Americans. They're also American. Yeah, they're also our neighbors. It's just concerning. Now, one of the things with this communist takeover, and this is kind of the theme, this week, this is this is the this is the

Demographic Shifts As Political Strategy

SPEAKER_14 22:10

agenda. The Republican Party, Donald Trump, he wants to run on America and the common sense versus communism. And I think there's a lot of merit to that. For people like me who've kind of watched this developer for a couple years now, there's definitely an uprising, right? And there's definitely a lot of comparisons you could make both to the Russian Revolution and the lead up to that and the overthrowing of the Tsar and the established form of government. You could make a lot of comparisons to the French Revolution and the lead up of the Jacobin takeover and everything that happened there. There's a lot of similarities. And one of the similarities that you see in both of those revolutions that you see today is the positioning of people. Okay. Putting people in places that can change the political balance of an area. This is putting 20,000 Haitian migrants in the city of Springfield, Ohio. This is importing a quarter million Somalis into Minnesota. This is importing transgender people into the city of Seattle. These people that become transported, that are un that have no allegiance to the land or the people of that land, but they have allegiance to the benefactors who brought them and the benefactors who pay their welfare, et cetera, et cetera, that becomes who they work for. That becomes who they're aligned with. And they become the foot soldiers of that movement. If the it if the industrial complex that migrates people from Somalia to Minnesota is threatened, this the Minnesota Somalians will stand up against that. Absolutely. Whatever industrial complex, for example, we're going to play a clip here in just a second from our friend of the show, Victoria. When in Seattle, when you're importing transgender people under the guise of now providing state-sponsored care, you create foot soldiers, right? You create foot soldiers. And that is something that we the people have to be aware of. Is when your neighborhoods start to have a demographic shift, and that demographic shift that's coming in, those people coming in aren't just working at the local factory and putting down roots, but are actually connected to, you know, a bigger benefactor. That's a

Seattle Trans Relocation Funding Fight

SPEAKER_14 24:17

problem. Here's Victoria testifying in Seattle because Katie Wilson has started a program to actually proactively help relocate transgenders into the Seattle area and provide care for them.

SPEAKER_12 24:29

Today I'm here to share comments on the trans and queer interdepartmental team, IDT, formed by the mayor to establish a structured permanent framework for supporting transgender and queer individuals who have relocated to Seattle to escape hostile environments in other states. The clear intent of the IDT is to redirect public funds to pay for housing, food, and elective and cosmetic medical procedures for trans individuals. We oppose the use of taxpayer money for these purposes. It's clear that the appeal made to the mayor to declare an emergency of trans refugees was based on highly inflated numbers and that no such emergency exists. I am calling on the council to take action to disband the IDT, and I will bring more public attention to this issue to help facilitate this. It is ironic to claim there is a genocide on the trans community when the truth is that the trans movement is the genocide upon our people. It is unconscionable to persuade a child to damage or destroy their reproductive organs before they've even reached the age of consent. The trans movement is a glamorized form of population control pushed by leftist pushed by leftist ideology. So, yes, trans individuals have been victimized, but not by Republican policy. In fact, Seattle Republicans can be a part of welcoming them, seeing them as equals under the law, and recognizing them as contributing members of society. Thank you very much.

SPEAKER_14 26:00

That is true. Transgender people do make great coffee. And if that was the only reason we were importing them here to the Seattle area, I'd be on board with it. But she's correct. In the big picture, the transgender movement is the genocide on nuclear families. Yeah. Right? The transgender movement is the genocide on a growing population. And not only that, they do become very dedicated foot soldiers in the cause. Mark Victor Hansen explains this.

Jacobins Then And Now

SPEAKER_14 26:26

This communist revolution, this communist takeover, again, it has echoes into the past, into things like the French Revolution.

SPEAKER_00 26:34

We're watching a modern-day French revolutionary like takeover of the Democratic Party. You can call it the Reign of Terror, the Democratic Guillotine. What I mean by that, in 1793 and 94, when the French Revolution was well on its way to fruition, a group of radicals called Jacobins, led by the Robespierre brothers, hijacked that revolution and decided that they were going to go far, far to the left of the effort to abolish the monarchy and rename the days of the week, the day the months, start with a year zero concept, uh go out and attack private property and execute people. Now I don't think the Democratic Socialists are going to do that, but their takeover is similar to the Jacobin takeover. And what is their agenda? Their agenda is radical green new deal, uh, war on fossil fuels, open borders, no deportations, no deportations even for criminal criminally convicted. Uh in addition to that, cut the defense budget, defund the police, institutionalize diversity, equity, inclusion, chauvinism. We're all going to go by our incidental affiliations. If you're trans or gay or female or black or Asian, uh that's going to be what you identify in as a large group of victimized with complaints against the white male, et cetera, et cetera, victimizer class.

SPEAKER_14 28:24

But that is the agenda. We are watching the Democrat Party, and we started talking about this a day or two ago. We're watching a wing that has been part of the big tent of the Democrat Party, essentially like Jacobins, just go, you know what? We're not just here to resist Trump. We're not just here to line our pockets. We want to take the whole thing. We want to start over with year zero. We want to rewrite the Constitution, pack the court, do whatever it takes to get things done the way we want them done. We want our solutions implemented. This is a big deal, right? The press secretary of the United States of America of the White House, Carolyn Levitt, got on TV in their celebration with America 250 and everything that's happening with that, with Jesse Waters, and said out loud, this is not your parents' Democratic Party. There is a communist revolution on the march.

SPEAKER_01 29:19

This is not your granddaddy's Democrat Party. This is not the Grand uh Democrat Party of JFK. This is a full-blown communist revolution that is taking over Capitol Hill right here in Washington, D.C., just a few steps away from where we are sitting right now. The inmates are running the asylum. These are crazy people who are advocating against what I call the three Ps prison, police, and uh prison, police, and private property. They don't want any of those things. And those are the ideals that founded this great country 250 years ago. But as President Trump says, communism is easy to sell. You just promise people free stuff until a few years. You're living in squalor with no free home, no free food, you're just sitting there with a whole bunch of communists looking around and saying, What the heck happened?

SPEAKER_14 30:07

And what happens is as you bring people to Seattle for free transgender care, or you pre-people to LA for free cigarettes and money for signing ballot initiatives, and you create this class of victims who are constantly waiting for their payout. When the payout never comes, the people who invited them, who created a loyalty element, will then say, you know what? If you just help us get rid of the last few country club club Republicans, we can finally go all the way. We can Trotsky this thing and make communism universal. We can finally, you know, take Elon Musk's wealth and redivide it amongst us as if it will ever expand beyond that, right? There is an element of this here, right? There is an element of population control, demographic control, and putting enough people, this is the brown shirt concept, putting enough brown shirts in the right neighborhoods to cause a ruckus. You don't need to shove people into Burley, Idaho, right, to cause a revolution. What you got to do is you got a bunch of shove a bunch of people into downtown Boise, shove a bunch of people into downtown Seattle, shove a bunch of people into downtown A LA. Are those are these our major cities are the beating hearts of our states and the beating hearts of our nation. And if you can flood those streets with people who are committed to the revolutionary cause, you can, just like the Jacobins or just like the Bolsheviks, you can topple a huge system. Because what runs this place, what ultimate ultimately upholds the illusions, it's just a bunch of wizards behind the curtains. It's just a bunch of county commissioners that are just normal dudes. It's just a bunch of building department directors that are just normal dudes. And guess what? They're not wizards. We're not normal dudes. They're not wizards. That's the point. You get behind the curtain, you realize he's not a wizard. He's a short guy with pimples, right? What did we learn from the David Dogs case here in Kitsap County that just got caught with trying to solicit a minor, right?

SPEAKER_16 32:08

Wow.

SPEAKER_14 32:09

The guy counting your ballots, by the way, which we've got some reporting on that. We're kind of trying to put together a full story. But in this last election, this guy was kicking people out of the count, boxes with holes in it, right? We're starting to see, hey, you know what? This guy that's corrupt in his personal life might be corrupt in his political life too, right? And in his job at the election, counting ballots, right? Talk about affect our lives. So what do we find? A fat, overweight white guy that looks that solicits minors is the guy in charge of your elections locally. Wonderful. Wonderful, wonderful. So this idea of relocating people who can then become functionaries and apparatus and tools in the hands of the communists is pretty scary.

DSA Says The Quiet Part Loud

SPEAKER_14 32:53

Here is an online meeting of Democratic Socialists of America. Now keep in mind, publicly, when they report in the New York Times or any legacy news outlet, they're like, well, we're not communists, we're Democrat Socialists of America.

SPEAKER_21 33:05

But when they talk in private, I am a communist, you know, and you know, this is what I want to fight for.

SPEAKER_02 33:11

As a as a communist who does, you know, Pro Partisan organizing.

SPEAKER_22 33:15

I mean, our goal is liberation. Our goal is communism. Um, I think we can transform DSA uh into a revolutionary and practical organization.

SPEAKER_18 33:26

We are revolutionary socialists who believe in the working class and believe that it's in desperate need of a revolution and thus needs a workers' party with an internationalist and anti-imperialist purview. We believe that DSA is the best method to achieve this.

SPEAKER_21 33:39

At the end of the day, like, yeah, we're in DSA because we believe that DSA, whatever it is, can always powerhouses the vehicle uh for socialism here.

SPEAKER_11 33:49

I think DSA has retreated on abolition somewhat. Like five years ago, we had Siran tweeting, queer liberation means defund the police. Type of Trotskyism I I've I I adhere to, and I think the type of Trotskyism Trotsky actually argued, it says we recognize these problems and we defend them in.

SPEAKER_14 34:08

We must so Trotsky is interesting. His whole thing with the revolution in Russia was it had for it to work, it had to be universal. It had to get everybody and the whole world.

SPEAKER_16 34:19

Well, that's what I was just gonna say about these folks was like, if you guys could convince a lumberjack to join your group, I might talk to you.

SPEAKER_14 34:25

Lumberjack would look at this group and he'd be like, I could kick all of your asses. I was at one of my wife's Christmas parties for a real estate group. And this is back when I'm in construction, you know, and I'd been pretty construction's a fairly man-oriented thing, and you know, don't step on someone or bump into anything like that. It's it's it's prison light, okay? It's it's a rough crowd, it's a rough crowd. It definitely prepared me for some of the crowd I would see in prison. I knew how to handle rough blue-collar guys, right? Sailors, so to speak. Well, I went to one of my wife's Christmas parties and it was full of realtors, and I came out of the real estate world at that Christmas party. I'm looking around all the men, and I'm like, I can kick all of your asses. You guys are a bunch of pillow biters in here. All right. So, but but he's talking about Trotsky. Trotsky wanted to make this universal. Trotsky gave us the gift of convincing communists that communism, no matter its failures, can never be judged until it's universal. Uh right. So he basically ceded this idea that it will fail unless you take over the whole world. So go, my friends, and take over the whole world. Okay.

SPEAKER_24 35:35

Be willing to meet the challenge of building a member-driven mass organization that can harness the revolutionary potential of the working class.

SPEAKER_34 35:44

Uh, I first joined DSA at the end of 2021. So when I came into the US for grad school, I got involved in students for justice in Palestine.

SPEAKER_02 35:52

Um, and then after I graduated, I organized um the New Year's community and that internationalism is key to change for us as socialism here in the United States because it helps us see what's possible.

SPEAKER_11 36:05

DSA has remained one of the only coherent poles of resistance to both fascism and capital in the United States. We are only going to build ourselves into a fighting party by ensuring that our electoral work and our independent working class organizing. Look at this picture on the back. Oh, I'm looking at all of it.

SPEAKER_14 36:22

We are the lumberjackers in the state.

SPEAKER_11 36:29

Are working in concert and are strengthening each other.

SPEAKER_04 36:32

We are fighting to uh dismantle like these policing structures, but ultimately we have to be ready to take control of our neighborhoods to fight for our symbolism of just this picture here the White House burning with communism dropping in on parachute. Neighbors.

SPEAKER_22 36:51

If you're a cop or Zionist, stay the fuck out of DSA. Um, because those are the two criteria that we actually don't allow.

SPEAKER_21 36:57

So when we say we want a vanguard party of professional revolutionary cadre, we're talking about organizers who are on the front lines of labor struggles, tenant struggles, and so on.

SPEAKER_05 37:08

It is so important that as DSA, we are developing organizers who can look at the conditions, figure out what exactly uh is the pressure point, what what is that weak point that we can push on to help start breaking capitalism down.

SPEAKER_16 37:23

Why do you sound retarded? This is what we're up against, folks.

SPEAKER_14 37:28

This is what we're up against.

SPEAKER_16 37:30

Like I love how I love how they're so inclusive that they don't allow people in.

SPEAKER_14 37:36

If you're a cop or a Zionist, get the poop out.

SPEAKER_16 37:40

Right. So I pulled the clip. I also, you know, I've been saving this one up. Um the LGBTQ plus whatever community is so inclusive they don't have a indigenous people link to queer. But they can't figure out how to include an H. The heterose. Homos? The heteros.

SPEAKER_14 37:59

That's cis. Oh sis. You can't have the H because it could be Homo or hetero.

SPEAKER_16 38:04

So you gotta you can't change the way that I identify myself. Get real, bro. Accept me as I am.

SPEAKER_14 38:15

I always think it's funny. It's LGBT LGBT movement, and it's like lesbian and gay. Isn't aren't lesbians gay?

SPEAKER_26 38:22

Like I don't know.

SPEAKER_14 38:24

Anyways, it's a very serious thing.

SPEAKER_15 38:27

Stephen Miller, who what's just funny that you say it's a very serious thing after we just laugh about it for two minutes.

unknown 38:37

Yeah.

SPEAKER_14 38:38

This it's interesting to me that Donald Trump, I mean, we we've been talking about this on the sidelines for years now. This this collectivism versus individualism, fighting communism from within. And I mean, come on, this goes back to the McCarthy era. This has been like a hundred-year theme, but it is very intense. You know, when you when you watch clips like that, remember if you go back in time and you study Hillary Clinton's pedigree and kind of where she came from educationally and stuff like that, she was writing thesis papers in college about revolution and about taking over the government. And basically, essentially, you know, you've got uh what's his name, her big big hero that she wrote her paper on. Uh, he wrote the book Rules for Radicals. Is it Saulinsky? It is Sol Olinsky. Solinsky wrote Rules for Radicals. And Solinsky, his whole thing to take over the government was to basically create student groups and outside groups that would put pressure on politicians to change. Hillary Clinton took it a step further and she said, No, no, no, no, no, no. We can't do the revolution from the outside. We actually have to take over the government. We have to get into government. And so she took the Zolinsky's rules for radicals, and I think it was her master's thesis or her you know senior thesis. She wrote a paper essentially saying that the revolution needs to happen from within. So Hillary Clinton directly like has been a huge part of bringing these type of DSA ideologically driven people into the Democrat Party and into positions of power. Like, this has been a concerted effort on her part. Not so much Bill Clinton, by the way. Their politics are a little bit different, believe it or not. Even people in politics will say that. Like, you know, this is Hillary Clinton politics, not Bill's politics. Bill was very blue dog Democrat esque. Hillary is very Democrat Socialist of America, burn it down-esque, going all the way back to her college days, right? So this is Stephen Miller, the deputy chief of staff for Donald Trump, who is speaking to a gathering of military members in Washington getting ready for this 250th day celebration.

Builders Versus Destroyers Mindset

SPEAKER_08 40:45

Builders and destroyers. Between the people who do the work to build, sustain, and nurture civilization, the people who serve, who sacrifice, who give, who care for others, who protect others, who defend others, and those who only destroy. Who litter, who rob, who graffiti, who deface, who degrade. Civilization only exists because of people like you. People who choose to serve, who choose to sacrifice, who choose to build, who choose to dedicate themselves to some cause greater than their own vanity. Each and every one of you is the reason why America's future is brighter than it's ever been before. So on behalf of President Trump, on behalf of the White House, on behalf of the U.S. government, and on behalf of the American people, thank you. You have our everlasting gratitude.

SPEAKER_14 41:38

God bless, and happy Independence Day. People get divided into the two camps, the builders and the destroyers, or as we would call them, the individualists who want to build up their lives and a rising tide raises all boats. When you build your own house, your children suddenly have a roof. Right? When you show that example to your kids, your kids will repeat it, it repeats it in generations to come. But when you're a taker, when you're a destroyer, that's what you do. You never build, you always destroy. You always take what someone else created. And that's just the way that history has worked. And it's the intern the eternal struggle that we face. And that's why I love being a peasant, because no matter what happens, we have to live here. No matter who's in charge, we have to live here. You know who still lives in Russia? Russians. You know who still lives in Rome? Romans. Right? It doesn't matter if the empire rises or falls, it doesn't matter if the nation succeeds or fails, the Russians still live in Russia. And Americans will continue to live in America. We have to live here. May as well be us behind the curtain, don't you think? Why would we let the communist revolutionaries behind the curtain when we know what they're up to? They tell us openly you're Trotskyites. You want to destroy everything to build it back in your own image, and you won't accept your failure as defeat until you've destroyed everything. And that is your ideology. It's not complicated, it's not curves that we can't get the wheelchair over, right? It's it's it's very simple. We built this country. Builders built this country. And for people who actually contribute to the fabric of civilization, you know your role. You go talk to a plumber, and the plumber knows that without him and others like him, civilization falls apart really quick. Right? I'd rather have a plumber than a hundred revolutionaries when it comes to civilization. Now, Jack Smith was on with MS Now.

DOJ Trust Collapse And Lawfare Claims

SPEAKER_14 43:42

You remember who Jack Smith is, right? Yeah. He's on MS Al and he believes that Trump has destroyed or irreparably harmed the DOJ, to which I clap.

SPEAKER_28 43:54

Like Paul Weiss and others. What do you make of the damage they're doing to our democracy at a moment you described? This diary.

SPEAKER_17 44:00

Oh boy. Yeah, well, I I think one of the problems, uh, I mean, there's several layers, right? One of the problems right today, besides the the retribution prosecutions, is that the Justice Department can't do its job, right? If you go to court, well, if you go to court and the judges don't trust you, you can't do the basic things that you need to do to represent the American people in court. And we have seen judges across the country uh say they can't trust prosecutors anymore. That has such a cascading effect on any sort of case. Uh and you know, I can't count how many opinions. But one opinion like that in my career would have been seismic. People could not would not know what to do if a court said, you know, trust that's been built over generations has been lost in days, right?

SPEAKER_14 44:48

You know, it's funny. This is a guy who had his Enron Arthur Anderson case overturned at the Supreme Court nine to zero.

SPEAKER_17 44:56

That's happening every day. And so, regardless of what you think politically, they're just not effective at doing their job anymore. They've jettisoned expertise, right? And so we have a situation where we've got rid of people who know how to protect our national security. And we think that that's somehow not going to have an effect on our national security. Uh, you know, an example I can give you, uh Brian Driscoll, I don't know if you know who he is.

SPEAKER_28 45:22

He he was the He made a great video at the beginning, uh to kind of rally the troops it seemed on the outside.

SPEAKER_17 45:28

Yeah, I mean, he's a folk hero in the FBI. If you were casting for a hero, that's what they looked like, right? Yes. Um, and and just for your viewers, uh, this is a guy, career agent, you know, mob investigator, SWAT team, hostage rescue, served overseas, medal of value, bravery medals, all these things, and an expert in counterintelligence. They got read of him because he stood up for agents who were being targeted improperly. You can't tell me, you cannot tell me our country is as safe as it was when people like that are being let go and fired for no reason.

SPEAKER_14 46:06

Oh, oh, people who participated in weaponization of government, keep in mind this is really rich coming from a guy who doesn't even know if he was sworn into office or not. Oh, yeah, I just can't uh the judges can't trust you. Now, part of the reason the judges can't trust the DOJ and the DOJ is ineffective in some of its prosecutorial efforts is because of this deep state resistance that has been built up over years. Remember, Hillary Clinton, going all the way back to the 70s, was talking about how to take the revolution from college campuses into government itself. And you got to remember, these people aren't just focusing on only the department of education, they've got people spread throughout the parts of government, including the judicial branch, the legislative branch, that are all under, let's just call it CIA control.

SPEAKER_16 46:55

I would assume every department.

SPEAKER_14 46:57

Every department, right? Mal called it the long march through the institutions, and the American socialists, the American communists took note. If you want to take over a country without firing a shot, you need to do it by going through the institutions.

SPEAKER_28 47:10

Trump says these people are dirty. Todd Blanche says we're lucky to have Trump involved in this. What still exists in the system to slow that down?

SPEAKER_07 47:30

I think as Liz mentioned, there's still a legion of professionals uh in the law enforcement environment, the Department of Justice, as well as the CIA and other places, the ones who are refusing to follow politically motivated prosecutions, those who are refusing to uh support any type of political activities on the part of the Trump administration that are inconsistent with the authorities, the responsibilities of the intelligence community, law enforcement community, and Department of Justice. So we have to rely on these individuals to stand up to their professional responsibilities and also to the courts, to the judges, to those judges who, in fact, took an oath of allegiance to the law, not to a political party, not to a person. And you know, I like to think that there are still some members of Congress. Certainly, you know, I'm looking for the Republicans who at one point had spoken out against Donald Trump and had spoken in support of the law, but they seem to have just totally caved. And I think, as has been said, you know, what has happened to our institutions is really uh going to have long-standing damage uh to these institutions, to our system of justice.

SPEAKER_14 48:38

So basically, what you're saying is the system was set up to where we got our way, and now that we don't get our way every single time, we have to rely on those few who are going to be the resistance.

SPEAKER_16 48:47

Right. And he usually refers to them as legions. Why does he keep using that word?

SPEAKER_14 48:53

Is that like a as it's almost like he means both meanings? Oh the legion of demons, right? And a legion is in a large number of people who are committed to the DSA cause, the Democratic Socialist of America cause, the communist cause. Again, these people tell you exactly who they are. John Brennan said he told us we know this as a fact, he voted for communist candidates back in the 70s and 80s. James Comey voted for communist candidates in the 70s and 80s. And now, fast forward, and who do they rely on as their base of support to help be their support structure? The communists that are out there in the quote Democrat Party.

SPEAKER_16 49:35

Should be a disqualifier.

SPEAKER_14 49:37

Should be a complete disqualifier. Now, the Supreme Court did hand Donald Trump quite the victory this week, but before we get to that, Ron, you gotta kind of cut for us?

SPEAKER_16 49:45

Yeah, which one you want?

SPEAKER_14 49:46

Just do one.

SPEAKER_16 49:47

Okay. All right, let's do this one. Uh Access Med, powered by Cernova Health, is a revolutionary telehealth service that offers fast free online evaluations and free home delivery of customized compounded medications, offering custom weight loss support, ivermectin therapy, hair restoration, cosmetic rejuvenation, custom ED treatments, and more. You complete your visit in less than 10 minutes, and there's no subscriptions or recurring fees ever. We've made getting started easier than ever. Simply follow the link, choose the product or treatment you're interested in, and then complete a quick online evaluation. Within days, your custom meds will arrive to your door. Mention rumble in the coupon code and get 10% off your first treatment. Phew!

SPEAKER_14 50:30

That is amazing.

Supreme Court Ruling On Firing Power

SPEAKER_14 50:32

Now, Donald Trump was handed a huge gift in what we call the slaughter case, and that now he has the ability to fire anyone in the executive branch, and he believes he can still fire the governor of the of the slaughter of Federal Reserve.

SPEAKER_32 50:45

So has Lisa Cook uh on the Fed the Supreme Court ruled on Monday. I'm not really sure exactly whether it was on the merits or whether it was procedure, but I think you said it it's procedure. Yeah, you're you you're gonna take the appropriate action when when the time comes. What could you do to to to get rid of get her off? How would you do it at this point?

SPEAKER_30 51:05

By winning the case. Uh they sent it back, not based on the merits, they send it back on process and procedure. So we'll start the process and we'll do perfect process and perfect procedure.

SPEAKER_32 51:17

Speaking of of the Supreme Court, you're allowed to fire except for the Fed you're allowed to fire people out of the federal agencies, which for you in in your term would would make a big difference for you.

SPEAKER_30 51:27

But my question is Which is by far the biggest slaughter, is it called the Scotable? It was by far the biggest of all the decisions and all of the cases and all of you know what they just announced. Um so this has been going on since 1932, where they took the right away from FDR. They took it away, which was you know, you think of FDR, that doesn't happen, but it did. He fought very hard to get it back. In fact, he wanted to pack the court. He was willing to pack the court. There were his justices. And this has been going on since 1932 and wanted back. And there are those that say this is one of the biggest decisions handed down in decades.

SPEAKER_14 52:08

You know, that bigger when you think about the growth of government, every time you have a new program, you have a new staff. Yeah, you don't typically get rid of old programs. So once that Humphreys case was decided, which is what was overturned in this slaughter case, the president couldn't fire people.

SPEAKER_16 52:23

So if a committee or a department or a bro, you know a big floor of cubicles that what they were talking about when they said something got taken away in 1932?

SPEAKER_14 52:34

They took away the president's ability to just fire people at once. Well now you had to have cause, right? Which which created essentially union-like protections for government employees, which couldn't be fired.

SPEAKER_16 52:45

I mean, it's now we gotta get rid of that.

SPEAKER_14 52:47

And and if you remember in Doge, when they were talking, it might have actually been in Trump's first term, but they were doing some Doge light stuff, and they found that there was some piece of paper that there were a chain of federal workers, and this was endemic in the whole system, but they used this one specific example, and it was like a singular piece of paper that needs multiple check boxes filled out on it, and each checkbox gets filled out by a different person who has no burden of review. Okay, so all they do is they just have to check the box, put their little initial next to it, pass it on to the next guy. Like there's literally no review. It's the process, and these employees do nothing other than check the box, like that's their only job, and they might check the box once a month. Oh man, uh, you know, I think I've made jokes about this before. Yeah, it was it they found entire chains of employees that were put in place back in the day when it was, you know, the there was a function. In fact, oh, it was it was it was Elon Musk. He was talking about how when they go to get records or something, they have to literally like go down into a cave. There's like one guy that has the keys to the vault. And it was it was going through this whole ridiculous thing where you have all these full-time employees that like you have literally a guy whose only job is to ultimat the vault for this one person who physically has to go into an elevator to go file a copy of something. It's like this insane thing that, like, well, we can't fire them because then who would operate the elevator down into the into the the bunker, you know, and we can't fire them because who would open the door? It's like, why don't you just give the guy who has to file the paper the elevator code and the key to the door? You know, it's like one of those things. All right. So again, communists, Bolsheviks, uh uh Jacobins, they move people around. And this was something that we saw. You look back through history, and as the revolutions in both Russia and France were kicking up, people were on the move. They were positioning foot soldiers like in in German in Hitler's Germany. We called them brown shirts. These are the people who roughed people up on the streets, got rid of law and order, which then created the impetus and it created the public sentiment that they wanted Hitler to come in and create law and order. Now, they didn't know, as far as broad understanding, that the brown shirts causing all of the beatings in the streets, literally, they were beating Jews in the streets, destroying stores, just causing chaos in the streets, actually were loyal to Hitler himself. So they the guy who sends people this is mob mentality. The guy who breaks your windows, you ask him to stop breaking the windows. He says, Yes, I will ask my goons to stop breaking windows. Just give me power, right? And once he got power, what did he do with his goons? He did what the people who put him in power asked him to do. He lined the goons up against the wall and shot him in the head. Okay. So we have a similar thing happening in America. We have a criminal element, whether it's transgenders being relocated, whether it's homeless people being relocated. We literally have gang members in and out of prisons, and we have international criminals who are being relocated to different places in our country. One of our big cities in America is Chicago, which has been crime-ridden for a long time. And a lot of that crime is local, right? It's it's homegrown. But there's a large element of criminal criminal, there's a large criminal element supporting the local criminals coming from the outside, right? To my knowledge, not a lot of like cocaine or cocoa plants grow in Chicago. So they get their cocaine from somewhere else. You see what I'm saying? Yeah, yeah. So there's kind of a connection here. Well, the DOJ and the FBI have made a huge effort to surge the streets of Chicago and take the most criminal element off of the streets. This is in the chess game that's being played between the communists that are trying to take things over and Donald Trump and his administration who are trying to bring back an American element to governments, governance.

Chicago Surge And Judge Problem

SPEAKER_14 56:48

This is a huge deal.

SPEAKER_23 56:50

Hi, Aisha. A new dawn for fighting crime. That is how the U.S. attorney here is describing this new anti-violence federal push. And he says what he's doing is unprecedented.

SPEAKER_20 57:02

To our knowledge, this has never been done before in the northern district of Illinois. And making the operation badgeless created shared accountability and unified, mission-minded anti-violence work starting in the spring and continuing into the summer.

SPEAKER_23 57:21

Officials say within the last 60 days or so, 179 people have been charged in 140 newly filed cases. U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutreaux calling this operation, quote, quote, badgeless, because it required the work of multiple different agencies, including HSI, FBI, DEA, and ATF. Some of those taken into custody are accused of murder, armed robbery, and distributing fentanyl. One example from this operation was just announced yesterday. Those three alleged members of the Venezuelan gang, Trende Aragua, taken into custody right here in Illinois, in connection with a man murdered back in May. Investigators say he was shot multiple times and left for dead in a bathtub in an abandoned building after being kidnapped. And in these images from the complaint released today, one of the suspects appears to be wearing an ankle monitor. Pacheco Torres was already out of custody while facing other criminal charges. And acting attorney general Tom Glance pointed blame on sanctuary city policies, specifically no cash bail, and the U.S. attorney here agrees.

SPEAKER_19 58:26

We've got a problem with the Cook County judges. And more of you need to start reporting on that. Because what you see are people who are violent offenders, repeat violent offenders that the Cook County judges decide to release on pretrial conditions.

SPEAKER_23 58:52

But still, new numbers released by police today show that Chicago is averaging more than one homicide per day. That is up compared to the same time as last year, and Aisha, as we head into a busy holiday weekend.

SPEAKER_14 59:06

Wow. Now we know the statistic, right? 70, 80% of the crime is committed by 2% of the population because of the repeat offender.

SPEAKER_16 59:14

Are we supposed to point that out?

SPEAKER_14 59:16

Yeah. So this is a huge deal. Getting serious violent criminals off. But listen what that attorney said. He says we have a huge problem with the judges. The judges. What did John Brennan tell us? We have a legion of support still in the system, which probably includes some of them judges. Huge problem. Huge problem. But it's you got to fight the battle where you fight the battle. You got to go after the criminal behavior, follow due process, all that kind of stuff. These people committed real crimes, right? The fact that they're out on the streets, that's also a crime. But if you take the criminal off the street, you take the soldier away from the enemy. That's essentially the way I look at it now. Now, there are some soldiers that have more street value than others. Taking off a trend member is a big deal, but you know what else would be pretty significant is knocking out a governor. No. Imagine if you had a governor who was one of these wizards behind the curtain, causing all kinds of bulk in his state of California.

Newsom Inner Circle Wire Story

SPEAKER_14 1:00:17

Gavin Newsom. A Gavin Newsome appointee wore an FBI wire in a corruption probe. Yes. They got him. This is how they got Blavic, by the way. They got him on a wire being like, well, it's not my time to get paid for this sentence in Russia Obama. Never got paid, but just saying it cost him quite a bit of time in prison. So here we go. FBI infiltrated Gavin Newsom's inner circle by convincing governor's ally to wear a wire, the lawyer says. So what we've got here is this woman right here, Alex Podesta. Interesting last name. Wonder if she's related to John Podesta. Anyways, Alex Podesta, rather than go down with the ship, decided to wear a wire on her boss and bosses. And she did that. So that is awesome. You know, we had that, we had uh Gavin Newsom get up on that microphone and they're investigating me and my wife. Yeah. Yeah. They were a warrior, bro. You're in trouble. You are in some serious trouble. Patrick Redd reports this, and this is just another point of intrigue. Again, the revolution might already be behind the gates. He says this a Secret Service agent searched online for the location of the rooftop where President Trump would be assassinated was positioned. This is before the rally. As Trump came under fire during the July 13th, 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, according to Department of Homeland Security, Inspector General report. There's a lot of suspicions around Butler that there was some kind of operation going on, you know, Thomas Crooks. Who's Thomas Crooks? I said at the time, the only thing we're ever going to know about Thomas Crooks is quote, a quote crook shot Trump. That's it. And that is all we know. Yeah. I mean, we we know so little other. Oh, he went to gun ranges. Oh, his parents called 911 because he was missing. Oh, he has no social media footprint. Yeah, right. Okay. You know, but he was exchanging messages with somebody inside the FBI building.

SPEAKER_16 1:02:10

A secret service agent was Googling the location of the roof prior to and he walked around the place with a rangefinder for two hours.

SPEAKER_14 1:02:17

We have a legion of support. That's all I can hear in my ears. We have a legion of support. Okay. Now, one of the things Donald Trump is going to do, and he confirmed this with Joe Kernan, is Trump is still going to get rid of Lisa Cook.

SPEAKER_32 1:02:30

Warsh might not determine his other people on the Fed, obviously. And so has Lisa Cook on the Fed. The Supreme Court ruled on Monday. I'm not really sure exactly whether it was on the merits or whether it was a procedure, but I think you said it it's yeah, you're you're gonna take the appropriate action when the time comes. What could you do to get rid of? How would you do it at this point?

SPEAKER_14 1:02:54

So basically, this is like my friend Bruno Kuno Kua. Well, you can build the house, but you gotta follow some procedure. You got to draw the invisible line, then remove the invisible line. So that's what they're doing. Okay, we're gonna get rid of Lisa Cook, but we have to follow the procedure. We have to draw the invisible line, remove the invisible line, and then we can fire her. Totally ridiculous. Now, Jack Smith, continuing with this interview on MS Now, was pretty focused on the fact that all of these prosecutions against Trump's enemies are meritless and baseless.

SPEAKER_17 1:03:21

Um difficult in the moment, but I think for the future that's going to be really helpful to know.

SPEAKER_28 1:03:25

Are you afraid to be speaking out?

SPEAKER_17 1:03:27

Oh no, this is about him being afraid to be speaking out.

SPEAKER_14 1:03:30

We actually don't need to listen to that clip. Basically, he hired a law firm and the Trump administration came after the law firm. Why? Because they're part of all these law fair things. They're one of these law firms that just doesn't seem to like America or common sense, and uh they're like, we won't be bullied, we'll still represent you. Good for you.

SPEAKER_28 1:03:46

Good luck.

SPEAKER_14 1:03:47

Okay, here's the clip.

SPEAKER_28 1:03:48

The judge basically said that in the Kilmar Arego Garcia case, said that he found that this was a an instance where basically criminality was being reverse engineered all the way up to Todd Blanche. If a judge has found that, what do you think they're capable of with two more years?

SPEAKER_17 1:04:04

Well, I as I I said earlier, I I from my perspective, I've seen a number of cases. James Comey, Laticia James, Jerome Powell. I mean, right? Um there's there's not criminality here. I mean, seashells. I mean, so the only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people, and he has people who his former personal lawyers who are gonna do what he says regardless of the fact that this is ridiculous.

SPEAKER_14 1:04:34

Seashells. Listen, Jack Smith, you spent four years telling us that you're seeing things that we can't see. You'll speak through shot caller for murder. What? Yeah, you'll speak through the uh the indictments and through the court virus. Of course, it took him a year to get James Comey. It's not just seashells. You're not retarded. You know that they know stuff that's not released to the public yet, but yet they play this game, right? He's as big a player as anybody. The concern for this is massive. Carlit says judges in Harris County, Texas are so corrupt, all woke left-wing notes. I and that's Austin, Texas, by the way. I know it's amazing some of the judges you get in Texas. But, and I'm gonna play a clip that's gonna remind us of this here in just a second. Remember the James O'Keefe videos of the lady down in Texas that said I got Republican judges paying me to gather up ballots. So even when you have a Republican judge or a Democrat judge, dude, we can't trust any of the systems.

SPEAKER_16 1:05:26

Well, I was just gonna say, are you sure it's only Harris County?

SPEAKER_14 1:05:29

Yeah. Game 7 King 8 of NR10 says, I don't always shoot people, but when I do, it's from the roof of an FBI post where a dude happened to be uh on a break and the crowd reported me for an hour.

SPEAKER_26 1:05:44

Exactly.

SPEAKER_14 1:05:46

Hey, and thanks for the chat. I don't know who you are, but you look new, and we need 75 of you this month. Otherwise, this might be our last month in the Rumble program. Okay, to a state that hits home a little bit to me Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Voting Imports Allegation

SPEAKER_14 1:05:58

Wisconsin, there's A leaked phone call that has come out. And this is Rebecca for Wisconsin. She is a candidate in Wisconsin. And this phone call. In this phone call, she explains that they are importing Minnesotans to register in Wisconsin to vote for her socialist platform. Take a listen to this.

SPEAKER_27 1:06:21

This is currently really important. We have 15 W campuses and universities in our district. And then that doesn't come so that's between the population total of the parents and population. And then they put a lot of resources into Wisconsin, the same thing on a registration phase. Students are going to be really important. So we have 62W campus.

SPEAKER_14 1:07:10

Did you catch that? So we're just going to bring students over from Minnesota, say they're from Wisconsin, register them to vote and have them vote. Sounds pretty much like there's only one thing that can fix that. The Save America Act. But before we get to Trump talking about the importance of the Save America Act, I want to take a quick kind of intermission

America Song Break And Reflections

SPEAKER_14 1:07:28

break. We're going to listen to a song. This is a song that I don't know who created it. It's posted by uh some, I think it's AI generated, but it's a great little song. So you have all these Europeans that have been coming over to America and experiencing American culture for the first time. Yeah, and they're going, this is great. This song is made up of a bunch of their viral posts about, oh my gosh, free refills on soda and oh my goodness, look at Buckeys and stuff. Okay. So let's take a couple minutes and just listen to this song. This is just a break.

SPEAKER_25 1:08:18

Flew in from across the ocean, didn't know what to expect. Saw the skyline out the window, and I nearly broke my neck. Landed in Atlanta where the Georgia pines run green. And I said, This is the most beautiful thing I've ever seen. Pull up to an awful house at one and relate. That's from scattered smother covered. Ten out of ten, it's great. Discovered three refills, and I almost lost my mind. Found the channel, welcome that I never thought I'd find. Welcome to the land, to the plate. Flags from every nation wave on its flight. From Boston to LA, from that to the sea. This is what it means to be free. Welcome to the land. Welcome.

unknown 1:09:15

What's up?

SPEAKER_25 1:09:16

Welcome to the land of the free. The Scots marched in the Boston with their back by string clear. Gilts and tartan everywhere, the whole city stopped here. They sank flowers. Scotland at the Red Sox Penway Park. Let the whole of New England been going in the dark. The Germans at the highway fixed the road from south and all these deaths. The whole English Hobel, of course. But he left the streets, the space, bro, stops up in my mate. Steven got invited to the White House, yeah. The whole school training. Go to fans in New York when you open Times Square. Then they turn the escalator into a backing square. Rolling up together like a lot of little boy. Now you will leave alone. Welcome to the land. Welcome to the land. Welcome. Welcome. Welcome to the land of the free. Same way that they do. An NFL star grabbed a trash bag and join the whole crew. Mexico and South Korea. Best friends all on the street, dancing to gang them style with their arms around each feet. The Marx and Van playing their song. Show the world where you belong. Sweden searching for the rest of the Peter and Chris Man says the air conditioned and deserves its normal stand. English written chocolate buffy. The world is the same. And we're just getting all out. A bad whipper and a bucket drummer. Safan will hollow bad kill wicker playing music for us all. Different worlds, different words, different places, different names. Bubble when the whistle blows, we all come along the same from the rookie to rock and bell. From CL to the show. This is what it means to be brain. Welcome to the land. All is in the air and the whole world can see.

SPEAKER_29 1:12:26

Welcome, welcome, welcome.

SPEAKER_26 1:12:29

Welcome to the land.

SPEAKER_25 1:12:59

One beautiful game. One beautiful truth. The whole world is welcome. And the whole world taking through.

SPEAKER_14 1:13:18

Oh man, I love that song. I just thought I thought a song was like, I've got to play that for the audience. You know, this this last weekend I spent the whole time with the wedding, and then we went on to the family reunion. And the family reunion was up at the RV park. Yeah. RV park we built up in Port Angeles. And they've got a clubhouse there with a TV. And when we went into the clubhouse, guess who was sitting in the clubhouse? A bunch of Europeans watching soccer. Yeah. And the whole park was full of Europeans. We went to uh you know some spots around Lake Crescent. We went to a couple different, you know, kind of touristy spots because it's the reunion. So now we're doing the local tourism thing. It was Europeans everywhere in Port Angeles. Wow. Yeah, there's a lot of Europeans. There's a lot of Europeans touring around the United States right now, and I'm proud to show them what makes America so great. I love the last little video clip here with the American flag running out front there. Yeah, I like it. So fun. So fun. America is a great place, and it's made great by her people. The builders, the ones who go out and put crazy ideas to business like Waffle House. Who would have thunk of something like that? Right. And it really is made out of the builders, the people who live here. And we are blessed with this privilege to run our own country. Right? We are not slaves. We are not subjects. We are citizens of the United States of America. We get to elect our leaders and we get to replace our leaders from time to time. And this is a precious gift. But as we've seen over the last number of decades, there's been a slow erosion of election integrity. And there's been a slow erosion through means like propaganda and this communist revolution that's been taking literally decades to march through the institutions. And we're kind of at a precipice right now, right? We can lean into it and we can allow the socialists to have their full takeover, or we can resist and fight back. And the best way we can resist and fight back is start at the source of the problem, the elections themselves. Donald Trump understands this perfectly clearly.

Save America Act And Filibuster Talk

SPEAKER_30 1:15:20

You think through right creation or save America? Because if you do Save America, you're not going to have cheating.

SPEAKER_32 1:15:28

How do we get there on Save America? What would you like the majority to be to pass?

SPEAKER_30 1:15:32

Well, I would like them to get it passed. What I'd really like is for them to filibuster. Kill the filibuster. Terminate the filibuster. When they terminate the filibuster, then they'll immediately prove approve to Save America and a hundred other things. You could sit down all day long and just vote and you'd have it. And the sad part is we probably have five or six senators that won't vote for it, Republican senators, and all of the Democrats. So their policy is no good, the Democrats. I call them the Democrats because their policies are so bad. But uh but the one thing they unfortunately they stick together. They don't have to now a Mitch McConnell. And maybe we don't either.

SPEAKER_14 1:16:20

I don't know. I hate to dance on a man's grave. Yeah. But either way, right? Save America Act. Donald Trump understands. I don't want to sign anything until I sign the Save America Act. This pits the interest of the Senate against itself, right? How much do you really want to resist the Save America Act? Only citizens can vote versus the housing bill, where maybe you've got some pork attached, or versus uh uh the the uh PISA renewal, which you know you got your deep state benefactors who gotta get that passed. But if Trump holds strong and says I won't sign anything until I get the Save America Act, my gut tells me he'll get it one way or the other, right? My gut tells me he'll get it one way or the other. And once we get the Save America Act, to me, that will signify for, in my opinion, the official entrance into the golden age, the rebuilding of America, the truly encapsulate and go about the long, hard, arduous project that us builders are going to have to partake of of making America great again, that the golden age can officially begin. So that's my opinion is that the Save America Act will be the official demarcation of the golden age. And maybe in history we'll look at it just as the election of Donald Trump in 2024, because he brought about the Save America Act. But for me, that's the true starting gun, right? Everything else before that is a little bit performative. It's kicking the can down the road for the next communists to have more money and more resources to the market.

SPEAKER_16 1:17:43

Well, what I what I what I would how I would characterize it is everything up until now is hopium.

SPEAKER_14 1:17:50

I I I often think at the end of Barack Obama's term, if Hillary Clinton had got in and she had opened the border then, right? And if she had done some of some of the things that Biden did then, we would have just felt like, you know, under Obama we had very little to no growth, and we would have just been like, yeah, well, the end was really back in 2008 and this was inevitable. Yeah, right. But because Trump came in, turned the thing, fired up the cylinders, got the engines running again, he was able to avoid a crash landing and start to pull up, right, and gain some altitude. 2019, hottest economy we had ever had ever. 2020 comes in, and what does Joe Biden do? Okay, dramatic action, wide open border, wide open border. No more oil. Well, the first thing he did was kill the pipeline. Yeah, kill the Keystone XL pipeline and construction, like thing after thing after thing. He had to take dramatic effort to get the plane to crash again, right? They were so close to crashing it, and Donald Trump fired up the engines. So it took it it this term for Trump, if it just continues on its own inertia and we don't see the Save America Act passed, it's just a matter of time before the Uniparty puts in another bad candidate as president and undoes a lot of these changes and kills the engines, and then we have another dissent. Exactly. So that's that this could be just a punt buying us a little bit of time, or it could be an official change. If it officially changes and we pass the Save America Act, then I believe the golden age has arrived.

SPEAKER_16 1:19:18

And that's what I was saying is like if if this will be real action, everything up until now has just been feeding hopium. Feeding hopium, exactly.

SPEAKER_32 1:19:27

Amazing about this this country in in your words for the last 250

Jobs Numbers And Inflation Reality Check

SPEAKER_32 1:19:31

years. It's you always say like like never been seen before. There's never been a country like this that's ever been seen in the history of the Well, a lot of people don't understand that.

SPEAKER_30 1:19:39

Right now we are in a golden age. You understand it very well, you cover it very well. We have more factories being built today than ever before. We have more people working today than at any time ever in the history of our country. And people making more money than they've ever made. I'm not talking about rich people, I'm talking about uh people that have uh like normal or normalized jobs, more money than they've ever made before. 401ks are up at levels that they've never seen before, up 80 and 90 percent. And the stock market's at an all-time high. I think it's eighty-one days out of a short, you know, a year and a half, uh, eighty-one days. We have eighty-one records.

SPEAKER_14 1:20:20

So nobody's that now, you know, that might be the golden age by his definition. To me, I'm like, that's concerning. He's right though, wages are up. The problem is they're not up where they should be in comparison to the supply of money, right? He's right that we have more people working than ever before, but part of that is simply because we imported so many workers.

SPEAKER_16 1:20:41

I was gonna say some of those are the leftover 20 million people that ran over the line.

SPEAKER_14 1:20:46

Yeah, so while this is good directionally, at the same time, it bodes poorly for things like inflation. Here's Kevin Hassent explaining again, just reiterating, the economy on a whole is on good footing.

SPEAKER_21 1:21:01

You're reacting to the jobs report. Were you expecting this sort of slow down compared to the past months?

SPEAKER_09 1:21:05

You know, I I think that if you smooth through the ups and downs of the last three or four months, we're on a really steep upward trajectory. Uh, and I think the main story of the White House has been that all of these uh new factories, the groundbreakings that the president's been talking about, the $19 trillion is flowing into the economy, is gonna create a construction boom followed by an employment boom. And the construction boom is very visible in the data as well. Sure. I I mean the the beautiful bill has created an investment boom unlike anything we've ever seen. Uh it's allowed uh people who don't have to pay tax on tips, don't have to pay tax on overtime, uh, don't have to pay tax on their social security to work harder, make more money, and keep the money. Uh that we saw in the tax uh return data that the typical benefit across all three was maybe six to seven thousand dollars uh per per person uh in that qualified group. And so we think the big beautiful bill has done everything that we expected.

SPEAKER_14 1:22:13

So people keeping more money in their take home pay after the big beautiful bill. That's great.

SPEAKER_09 1:22:19

Oh, uh well well, uh, you know, we're hoping very soon that Chris gets confirmed. He's had a sharing, he did a fantastic job, he's a fantastic economist. Uh we're sorry to see Pierre leave. You can see the president truth something really wonderful about him because that's what a great colleague he is. And uh so you know, I I think that the CEA is in really, really good hands with Chris. The the thing is that if you look at the Joltz data where they tell you job openings, uh the job there are millions and millions of job openings, and so if people are frustrated, they got frustrated maybe because of Joe Biden's economy and left the labor market, they should come back in because there are jobs everywhere.

SPEAKER_14 1:22:58

I think that's great, right? And I do agree, we are on an upward trajectory. The problem is, is I think a lot of that upward trajectory is driven by inflation. And despite Trump's best efforts to tamp down on inflation, which it's very interesting how those numbers are calculated. They've tamped down on them, but you still have some of the same shady math that was going on in previous administrations. You still have an agenda, you know, you can't announce to the world we had 7% inflation. So you're like, we were at uh 3%, not 2%. But we took out housing, eggs, food, gas, heat, oil, eating oil, you know, all the things that you have to buy every month. Rap Ron, before we get into the next segment, go ahead and run that Rumble wallet ad.

SPEAKER_16 1:23:39

Let's do it. All right.

Rumble Wallet And Crypto Pitch

SPEAKER_16 1:23:42

We hear a lot about crypto, but here's the part most people miss crypto is created so you could actually own and control your money. After the 2008 financial crisis, Bitcoin was designed as an alternative to banks. So instead of banks holding your money, delaying transfers, or limiting access, you're in control. And if you've ever had to wait for a transfer to clear, you felt that problem. Now, fast forward to today. Everyone's heard of crypto, but getting started still feels complicated. That's exactly why I use Rumble Wallet. It takes all that complexity and makes it simple. Choose what you want Bitcoin, dollar backed, stable coins, or even digital backed gold backed by real gold. No complicated setup. It connects with MoonPay, so you can use your credit card, debit card, or bank and be up and running in minutes. Once you're set up, you can even support your favorite Rumble creators like me directly. So do it now. Scan the QR code and click the link in the description and download Rumble wallet. From there, you can set up your wallet, tap buy, and you're in the game. In just a few minutes, you can go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some. Phew.

SPEAKER_14 1:24:43

Yes. So speaking of crypto, that is the future. And the undersecretary of war comptroller, the chief financial officer, posted this picture. And I just think it's one of those things that you look at and you go, ha the future is now. Now, for those of you listening on audio, there's a wormhole of some sort here that you've got old World War II planes coming out of, and on the other side you have very modern warfighters with drones coming out of, but it's set in space with a wormhole. So for those of you conspiracy theorists, right, who have explored some of these space conspiracies, the idea that perhaps we already know how to travel through space and time, right? Because what is space? It's simply time as you go a certain distance, right? That it involves some types of wormholes or some type of bending of the time space fabric and continuum. And I'm seeing it in a picture. Like I just, you know, the future is now, apparently. I think a lot of times many of us just want to be Luddites and we really would like to go back to the 1800s and farm and buggy when life was simple and all you had to worry about was a cougar walking onto your ranch. You know, we really want to go back to that. But the reality is the future is going to be like the future was in the past. It's going to be what we expect, right? It's going to be constantly changing because that is the only thing that is constant, is change itself. And so when it comes to crypto and the new financial system, Donald Trump is really committed to leading the world in crypto because it will be the new financial system. It's basic we already have a digital economy. It's just updating the paperwork, right? And putting it all on the blockchain, as they as they say it. So Donald Trump in that same interview with CNBC talked about crypto and making the United States the crypto capital of the world.

Crypto Capital And Fed Rate Trap

SPEAKER_14 1:26:29

And I'm going to pair this with the fact that this might be the only legitimate solution to inflation. And it's not probably the solution we the peasants are going to be happy with. It's the solution for the bankers.

SPEAKER_32 1:26:40

But making money in the stock market, that makes sense. So as far as crypto goes, and I'm just wondering you you didn't divest your business, you're you have your sons running it. I think vice presidents and presidents aren't subject really to conflict of interest laws, but there's this notion that you need to be aware of conflict of interest. There was a large sum of money made in crypto. Did you know that your family business was going to engage in crypto? Did you have anything?

SPEAKER_30 1:27:10

Well, I was here before. I was there before I was in office. But the way I view crypto is a little differently. We have to be at the top, otherwise China's going to take it over. Like, for instance, AI, we're leading substantially in AI over China and everybody else. I mean, we're leading. When I was with President Xi three weeks ago, he greeted me in these first words. I mean, literally were, wow, you've really done a great job. You've really because this country was dead. We had a dead country. Now we have the hottest country in the world. And the way I look at AI, or the way I look at crypto, is if we're not going to do it, China's going to get it. Most likely China is somebody else. Japan is somebody else. And I want to re- It's a big industry. Crypto, if you call it an industry, but it's a big deal. And crypto is a big deal. You you look at it the way it's grown over. Over the years, you have believers, you don't have believers, you know, whatever it is, but it's a big deal. And anything we do, I want to be number one and and we're number one in crypto, and we're also number one in AI in the That's good.

SPEAKER_14 1:28:16

Currently we're number one, and he wants to stay number one. And it makes sense to me, right? If crypto is going to be the future of finance, then we want to instill our society's values into those guide rails, those guidelines, the c you know, the clarity act, so to speak, to establish the order that the big dog is going to play by and allow other people to adopt that order rather than us get beat up in the schoolyard and then have to adopt South Korea's financial system because it's the strongest one that makes the most sense. Now, in all of this, right, we still run on dollars and we're going to continue to run on dollars for a long time. And one of the things that Trump has said forever is that you can have a growing economy without inflation. Okay. So the idea is private capital, already existing dollars, will chase good investments, cause the economy to grow, and you don't have to print new money and inflate the money supply in order to get that growth. But you've got to stimulate that growth. So, how can you stimulate that growth with budget cut, with uh regulation cuts and things like that? Those that all plays in on a factor, discovering new markets, right? Nobody had any idea at the turn of the 1800s that the railroads were going to reshape the entire economy and add billions and measured in their dollars, it would be equivalent to trillions of dollars today to the economy. This is the exact same as space, right? With Elon Musk and those rockets. If you can launch a rocket into this space and land it in Asia in 45 minutes, you change the nature of travel and moving goods and services around the world and projection of force. It's as impactful as the railroads. I mean, it's just absolutely uh huge impact. We are at a at a cusp when it comes to new markets and new things. So we can have an incredible amount of growth and have a small to almost no inflation if it's done right. I question if it's possible. Here's Donald Trump saying we can get to super high growth without inflation. But I'm gonna show you the other side of that. Once you make the business plan, once you set up the business plan and you go down this path, you must get the capital one way or the other. So if it doesn't come from the private market, where's it gonna come from? It's gonna come from the government.

SPEAKER_30 1:30:27

When you announced bad numbers, the stock market would go down. Today it's the opposite. When you announce good numbers, the stock market goes down. Sometimes really weighted, depending on how good the work the better they are that work because they have this dysphobia, they have this horrible derangement syndrome about inflation. And growth can be good for inflation, not just bad for inflation. Shame any time numbers are announced that are not so good. I wish I could flip it the old way that when you announce great numbers, because otherwise it's almost like they want to kill success. You announce good numbers. I wanna like you have a couple of countries. India is one, doing very well, but it's at seven, eight percent. Others uh take a look at Japan's numbers. They're doing very well, she's very good, she's doing a good job, a friend of mine, but they're allowed to go up. We're not allowed to go up. If we go up, they want to kill it. There's no reason we should stop at four percent. We should be at twelve percent, at thirteen percent GDP. And I hate what happens where in the old days we would be that's how we built the country. Uh now you you announce positive things and uh they want to bring it down by raising interest rates.

SPEAKER_14 1:31:47

So what he's saying there is as the economy grows, the economy will automatically slow down because it anticipates a market rate hike, an interest rate hike. Because the Fed's mandate is to tamp inflation. And how do they measure inflation? The same things that we measure success with. When we are growing, we think it's successful, they view it as inflation, and now they have to raise rates, which then hamstrings us, right? That because they have this command and control version of the economy. I look at it when my business is doing really well and I'm on a hot streak, I want more money to grow. But when the money's more expensive, I don't use it, and then I get entropy, the business doesn't grow, it declines, and on my way down, then they lower interest rates, incentivizing me to now borrow my way out of my problems.

SPEAKER_16 1:32:30

I don't know if these words work, but it sounds like we're chasing a vanishing point.

SPEAKER_14 1:32:36

Yes, that's what fiat is. And and here's the thing while I support being the leader in AI, and while I support being the leader in crypto, once these business plans get set in place and have to happen, they start to become too big to fail because Donald Trump has put us in a position where the entire economy depends on their success. Right. So if the private market doesn't provide the capital, then the state will ultimately provide the capital. Guess we'll print it inflation. Because being the leader in AI and technology and space is of national interest. It would be a national emergency if we didn't. So no matter what happens, they're gonna get the money. They're going to get the money. You're saying the buses will be free? The buses are gonna be free, right? Either we pay or they pay, but at the end of the day, the people always get stuck with the bill. Here's Larry Fink saying that we will have more than enough money to achieve this infrastructure build out with AI, cryptos included in that, space race. This is all one technology

Larry Fink And Your Savings

SPEAKER_14 1:33:42

thing. They all feed each other. And where are they going to get those funds? For those of you that are familiar with the Frank Dodd Act and the concept of balance, this should send chills down your spine. This is Larry Fink from BlackRock.

SPEAKER_29 1:33:56

If we can get more and more Americans to think about growing with the United States, um we will have far than enough money to invest in this infrastructure. But as the governor was talking about, the need for electrons is growing every day. You know, if we're going to be the leader in technology, which we are, if we are going to be the leader in AI, which we trust it's just going to require trillions of dollars of investment. You know, we don't invest in it, China will be the global leader in the easy. So to me, it's not weather this is a mess. And if you think about how that translates, it translates into a more dynamic economy. We need the United States economy to grow at over two percent. We need the US economy to grow at three percent, especially with the growing deficits the federal government has. And so much of this money, not just for the private sector, is going to be coming from the private sector, from savings accounts, from pension accounts, from insurance companies, and on and on and on. Um the whole world is is in need of improving the infrastructure.

SPEAKER_14 1:35:21

So it's so important that we have to do it, it must happen, and there will be more than enough money. And where's it gonna come from? Pensions, savings accounts, insurance companies. This is bail-in talk. This is either you voluntarily give us your money by staking your 401ks with SpaceX or BlackRock or whoever, or we're just gonna take it from you.

SPEAKER_16 1:35:41

So we're just gonna loot all the citizens.

SPEAKER_14 1:35:43

I'm gonna loot all the citizens. We're either gonna get you to voluntarily invest it through your investment in vehicles, or we're gonna print it and it's gonna come from your savings, anyways. Uh that's exactly what he's saying here. So we're in a situation where we are moving on this trajectory, we're moving on the trajectory. So being solutions-oriented all the time, it's like, okay, if that's what the masters of the universe are going to do, then we have to kind of have a counter to that. Now, when it comes to cryptocurrency and Bitcoin specifically, remember, we always separate out Bitcoin from cryptocurrency, but they're in a same conversation. Bitcoin is the money, cryptocurrency is the currency. Just like they both give Tomas Dave the shivers. Yep. Just like yeah, just like gold is the money and dollars are the currency that were supposed to be backed by gold. Bitcoin is the gold of the future, it's the internet gold, and cryptocurrencies are the currencies that are ultimately going to be backed by some store of value. Okay. So this is the chairman of the SEC under Donald Trump talking about crypto technology.

SEC Project Crypto And Clear Rules

SPEAKER_06 1:36:44

Over the past year, we have moved purposefully to answer President Trump's call to make America the crypto capital of the world. So, what we're calling project crypto, we are taking historic steps to modernize our rules and regulations to facilitate markets moving on change. And after years of obscurity, we have delivered long hauled for certainty to digital asset issuers so that investors and entrepreneurs today can know before they act whether a digital asset is considered a security and there's therefore subject to SEC oversight. To be clear, this is not a favor to industry. It's what markets require to function. Clear rules of the road applied without preference. But a modernized framework is only as valuable as to the clarity with which it is applied, thus the C for clarity. So after years of fragmented oversight and overlapping authorities, the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission signed a historic memorandum of understanding between our two agencies, a framework for aligning key definitions, coordinating oversight, and replacing a regulatory no man's land between the two agencies with fertile new ground for innovation to grow.

SPEAKER_14 1:38:14

Hey, if it's 1860 and I said I've got some railroad stock to sell you, you'd be like, that's really speculative. I mean, who's gonna get rid of their horse and buggy? Yeah. It's the same conversation. Hey, it's 2026 and I've got some Bitcoin to sell you. Get on board. It's coming, folks. It's coming. Now, the way that the economy works right now is it's through incentives, right? The IRS doesn't care about the money. They can print all the money they want. They want to control how you spend your money. And so they do incentivize things. And some of the things they incentivize we think are ludicrous, like, you know, no natural gas stoves because they offer such great rebates and credits on electric stoves. Sure, all kinds of tax credits. But some of them actually make a lot of sense, right? Because if you're trying to shore up the American economy, you have to shore up the worker, you have to shore up the savings, all these kinds of things. Now you get in these little niches, and if you're a central banker, you're just like, ah, who cares what the people think? We'll just print the money we need, force them to use it. But one of the things the IRS is doing is they are incentivizing specifically Bitcoiners to develop mining infrastructure in the United States.

Bitcoin Mining Builds The Energy Grid

SPEAKER_14 1:39:21

So one of the great things about Bitcoin, and our friend Thomas Day, he mentions this all the time. Bitcoin mining is designed not to be profitable. It is profitable, but it's designed not to be like overwhelmingly profitable. It's designed to incentivize someone enough to develop energy infrastructure and take advantage of excess energy. But only just barely. But only just barely. Okay. Now, when you measure this over time, it can be pretty significant. But in the moment, when you're doing it, you're kind of barely turning a profit, right?

SPEAKER_16 1:39:51

But it means that a lot of miners they pick where the energy is cheap. And so a lot of times that's not in America.

SPEAKER_14 1:39:58

Well, you've got examples. There's a great video that Thomas Day recommended I watched one time where you know you've got Bitcoin miners who went down to the jungles of Guyana or wherever and found.

SPEAKER_16 1:40:07

Well, a lot of them go to places like Iceland where the electricity is cheap because of geothermals.

SPEAKER_14 1:40:12

But it's not just that it's cheap, Ron. It's that they actually build the electrical infrastructure. So you go down to a mine in Guyana where there's no power transmission lines within 100 miles, you build a small dam on a waterfall, you generate electricity, and you run electrical miners. Okay. Well, now you have electricity out in the middle of the jungle. Utility. Guess what happens? The local villages start coming in, start plugging in. And now you can sell them electricity instead of mining Bitcoin. But the Bitcoin paid for the infrastructure. If you want to spread green energy and low-cost energy to take advantage of all the kinetic energy we have in the world, whether it's wind or photon energy with solar or hydroelectric or geothermal, like aware that you have a differential you can take advantage of. Bitcoin decentralizes the development of the energy grid. Oh interesting. It's huge. It's the biggest thing you could possibly imagine. Down in Texas a couple of years ago, when they had the ice storms, Texas, because they're on their own little grid, they have their own electrical problems, but they also have a different price of electricity than the East Coast, right?

SPEAKER_16 1:41:21

So true.

SPEAKER_14 1:41:21

And so a lot of Bitcoin miners were down in Texas building these warehouses, setting up solar farms and windmills to get electric electric. And when the ice storm happened, the Bitcoin miners called up the local grid operators and they're like, hey, would you like us to shut down the miners and put our electricity on the grid? Oh they did. Wow. Right? They helped they helped save lives in Texas by redirecting the energy that to them was extra, right? They they had that, they built that infrastructure independently of the rest of the grid and they could power it back. Super powerful. So you can see why a nation state that wants to be sovereign, one of the things you can do is decentralize your electrical production. Germany had this when it came to fuel. In Germany, they didn't have oil fields in World War II. They weren't running their whole military on oil, they were running it on alcohol. And every farmer, he would produce excess grains and whatnot, and they would create silage and they would ferment it and they would create alcohol. So for every gallon of ethanol that a farmer in Germany used, they produced an excess gallon and a half that they could give to the army.

SPEAKER_26 1:42:26

Okay.

SPEAKER_14 1:42:26

Which then is what ran their tanks and all the stuff. So we didn't have any oil fills the bomb. You had to bomb every farmer to cut off their fuel supply. Whereas the United States spent an incredible amount of money defending the Gulf states and defending our oil supply because we ran on oil, not on ethanol. Interesting thing there. Imagine a situation where right now, if you hit a transmission line or a substation, because our grid is so centralized, you could take out millions of people's power by knocking out a critical piece of infrastructure.

SPEAKER_16 1:42:56

Don't give anybody any ideas.

SPEAKER_14 1:43:00

But Bitcoin incentivizes so much healing of what we need to do as a planet by decentralizing things like electricity, promoting green energy, and true wealth. Well, the IRS gets it. They've got a little thing right now. So Bitcoin right now is sitting at about $61,000. If you were to spend $250,000 on Coinbase, you would roughly buy about four Bitcoin right now. Okay. And the tax bill shows up later when you sell. Okay. Now, if you take that same $250,000 and you invest it into two S21 XP miners hosted at seven cents per kilowatt hour, it is a different move. You deduct the full amount against your income this year under Section 109. They're incentivizing you to do this.

SPEAKER_26 1:43:43

Okay.

SPEAKER_14 1:43:43

Your ASICs, those are your processors, start producing Bitcoin into your wallet from day one. And over 24 months, you're looking at about four Bitcoin. Know your client free, KYC free. So it's not tied to you. Mind blow spot. The hardware keeps running in year three, four, and five. We're watching the same price. But the investors who set up their ASICs at cycle lows are the ones who look back and understand why the entry point mattered less than the structure they used to accumulate Bitcoin. Same capital, very different outcome. Right. So it is one of those things. Bitcoin has a ton and ton of opportunities for you. And it can fix a lot of the problems we have. A lot of these wizards behind the curtain, some old fat guy running in a nuclear power plant, or a judge sitting on the bench up in Minnesota, all these wizards, right, that we think have some kind of keys of knowledge or special understanding. At the end of the day, they're just dudes like you and I, Ron. We could reproduce the entire electrical grid, couldn't do it in our lifetimes alone. But you know what we could do? We could change the electrical situation in one small town or in your neighborhood. You know what I mean? Like all these problems, all these wars we fight over oil. I was listening to Jay Ensley talking about we should be investing in windmills because then we don't go to war over windmills. And I'm like, we should just be taking advantage of all the excess energy we have and store that energy through Bitcoin for a future day. And I think that the Donald Trump and the United States government understands this. They understand we have to grow out of our debt problem. Unfortunately, I believe that that growth will ultimately come from inflation. Right? No matter how hard they try, we might be past the point of return and that growth is going to come from inflation. But we're going to have the growth. Larry Fink just told you, like, we have to do this. It's like national security interest at this point. So if national security includes inflation, guess what? We're going to be the ones who have to pay it. You know what I'm saying? And that's what you have to understand. If if all these Trump accounts, if every single Trump account doesn't go invest in what they need to and raise the capital from the private market, they'll print it because they cannot not have the infrastructure. And that's the that's the crossroads we're at now. All right, guys. Oh, Tom says here's the video. This green machines. Yes, that was a good video. Links in the chat.

Final Takeaways And Sign Off

SPEAKER_14 1:46:00

All right, guys. That is it for us today. Thank you for sticking around. And we will talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.

Monty Python Peasants Postscript

SPEAKER_33 1:46:36

I'm thirty-seven. Well, I can't just call him man. You could say Dennis. I did say something about the old woman, but from behind you automatically treat me like an imperialist. Well that's you get that, eh? Hanging on to our stated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Is there ever going to be any progress? How do you do, good lady? Um king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. We all are. We are all Britons. I am your king. You're doing yourself. We're living in a dictator. Stop perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. That's what it's all about. Please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? Who lives in that customer? Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco syndicalist commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Or you'll be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake. Signifying by the government. Lost to carry excaliber. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women, nothing important. Distributive thoughts is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the message, not from some plastic or aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to worry about supreme executive power. Just because some watery powerful saw that was an emperor. Just because some motion beast loves the symmetry.