The Sip Of Vindication

They tell us elections are secure, then tell us not to look too closely. That tension drives today’s conversation as we react to last night’s speech, the legacy media decision not to air it live, and the flood of claims and counterclaims that followed. If you care about election integrity, election security, and whether “fact-checking” is informing the public or managing a narrative, you’ll hear exactly why so many voters feel like the system asks for trust while making verification nearly impossible.

We walk through the big buckets at the center of the debate: foreign interference and influence operations (China, Russia, Iran), the value of voter registration data, and what it means when intelligence agencies label the same behavior “influence” in one context and “interference” in another. We also tackle voter roll maintenance and noncitizen registration claims, and why close margins make “small” numbers feel a lot bigger on Election Day. Along the way, we compare media summaries against the underlying logic we’re being asked to accept.

Then we get into the mechanics: voting machines, audit trails, paper ballots, chain of custody, and why the lack of a clean, provable trail fuels suspicion long after a courtroom deadline passes. We also discuss a Michigan-centered fraud narrative and the broader question it raises: if credible allegations surface, who actually has the incentive to fully investigate and prosecute? We wrap with a cultural lens on “weaponized virtue” and why people who want fairness often get pressured into silence.

If this conversation hits a nerve, subscribe, share it with someone who disagrees with you, and leave a review so more people can find the show. What rule change would most increase your trust in U.S. elections?

Transcript

Peasants Welcome And Friday Energy

SPEAKER_09 0:29

The revolution's gonna be true for the case for sure. It's the little guy, the little guys take the blue every day. It's gonna be peasants, man. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants! Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. It is Friday! Finally, I've been thinking it was Friday since Tuesday. There sings, good morning, glad you made it. Wow, first in line, first in time. Carlito and Tiffany, good morning, y'all. Carlito and Tiffany again on YouTube. Even Fox hasn't covered last night's speech, and I've had it on for three hours. You watch Fox? Go to Newsmax. They're covering it. They're sings. It's all it's finally Friday. Yes, it is. So glad it is. Carlit says, Good morning from Rumble. Thank you so much. All right. We had a great watch party last night. It was awesome. Trump came out swinging. It was a good speech. I felt very vindicated. Those of you who joined me for the watch party, which many of you did. Thank you very much for doing that. That was awesome. Just me underscore PNW. Yay to Friday. Yes, it is. Tomate. Good morning. Glad you made it. And I know why you guys show up bright and early every day. You show up for this simultaneous

The Sip Of Vindication Moment

SPEAKER_09 2:00

sip. And today's going to be a good one because it is the sip of vindication. We are finally going to be able to make good on a promise Joe Biden made us back in 2020. And all you need for this simultaneous sip and this beautiful moment of vindication is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank, or a chalice of style, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. The simultaneous sip, and it starts right now. Any country. No way. Not even possible. I'd already switched this. How is that even happening? Okay, here we go. All right.

SPEAKER_20 2:41

Indication. Any country, no matter who it is that interferes in American elections, will pay a price. They will pay a price. And it's been overwhelmingly clear. This election, I won't even get into the last one. This election that Russia has been involved, China's been involved to some degree, and now we learn that that uh that uh Iran is involved. They will pay a price if I'm elected. Any country, no matter is that real? Sounds like we're on track.

SPEAKER_13 3:10

Is that real? Yeah, that's real. That was real. Man, he was talking so fast. I thought it was AI.

SPEAKER_09 3:16

That was back before the uh brain rot really kicked in. But ultimately, last night, I would say this if Donald Trump had just taken the advice of the Hong Kong protesters, we wouldn't be in this position.

SPEAKER_19 3:26

Donald Trump don't trust China. China is ass ho.

SPEAKER_09 3:29

Donald Trump don't trust time. China is at all. All right, Carlitz, Fox should lose their license to no coverage last night or this morning. Hanning showed up, showed the speech, but no commentary. Yeah. Peasants perspective. That's you, Bron. Douglas Wyatt, good morning, peasants, and John Attackis. Good morning. Glad you

Dr Drew On Sudden Heart Cases

SPEAKER_09 3:49

made it. All right, before we get into too deep a coverage of last night's speech from Donald Trump, I do want to hear a little bit from Dr. Drew. Dr. Drew had we had Naomi Wolf on. And remember, Naomi Wolf was a uh communications person in the White House for Bill Clinton. She's a lifelong Democrat, feminist. COVID snapped her brain. She was like, Oh my gosh, the lying liars are lying to us again. And uh she oversed the Pfizer papers, got all that stuff released, and exposed a lot of what we know about COVID in real time as it was going on. Well, she was on Dr. Drew's show and they were discussing. Uh I've almost forgotten his name. That's how much I did not like this person. Graham, Graham Cracker, Lindsey Graham, Lady G. So Lady G's death with his aortic bice uh dissection. And I found something that Dr. Drew said interesting. And Ron, I think this is just gonna be our lives forever now.

SPEAKER_23 4:43

I I'd love you to look into the aortic dissection story because clearly there's something with the spike protein going on there. Lindsay Graham died of an aortic dissection. I've seen a dozen aortic dissections in the last four years. I'd seen two in my entire career before that. And so I don't know if it's COVID, I don't know if it's the vaccine, I don't know if it's both, but I I smell spike protein for sure. And uh for people that have persistent spike production, I there you go, something's going on there.

SPEAKER_13 5:11

Well, everybody men's hearts will fail them.

SPEAKER_09 5:14

Men's hearts will fail them every time someone dies, every time someone dies, and it's not like well, even if it's a long drawn-out cancer diagnosis, we're all gonna have in the back of our head, did they take the jab? You know, it's gonna always open that possibility. Very interesting. Whole long medical career, two aortic bisections that whole time. And in the last two years, he's seen a dozen of them. Pretty incredible. And that actually jives what I've heard uh about certain cancers, too. It's like this was only in the textbooks, and all of a sudden I've got four cases in the ICU.

SPEAKER_13 5:46

It lines up with how many soccer players I've seen die on the pitch, too. Yes, it

Foreign Interference Claims Meet Reality

SPEAKER_13 5:51

does.

SPEAKER_09 5:51

All right, last night, late into the night, John Solomon was at the White House and he was being uh he was at a gaggle of reporters around him, and they asked him about specific interference in the 2020 election and vote flipping. And this is another one of those ones where I go, oh, we're gonna come just short of the touchdown line here. We're gonna get to the five-yard line and we're not gonna punch this thing in. You know, it's the cyber ninjas problem down in in Arizona. Here's all the fraud. There's no possible way you could put this together in any other way than a stolen election, but we can't conclusively prove it was stolen. Why? Well, the law prevents us from proving it was stolen, essentially, is what it feels like. You know, do not challenge elections. Commandment 101, commandment number two. Ah, you should try to have an audit trail. You should try, you know what I mean? It's like all the other stuff is superfluous ruling. The only ruling that is black and white written in stone is thou shalt not question our ultimate certification. Anyway, so here is John Solomon basically saying, yeah, we haven't found anything dispositive. We're not telling the president.

SPEAKER_05 6:52

You acknowledge that there were no votes changed in 2020.

SPEAKER_02 6:54

I I all I can acknowledge is what the intelligence shows, right? I only know the intelligence committee has zero evidence that someone has flipped a uh that a foreign power flipped a vote in 2020, 22, or 24.

SPEAKER_05 7:04

And you have no you're able to acknowledge you're able to acknowledge that Venezuela has not tampered with voting machines in the United States.

SPEAKER_02 7:11

No, the the the the uh uh uh intelligence is very clear. They did it on their own machines. Why is it important that they did it on their machines? Their machine protocols are the same as America. Why? Because for a long time they didn't have to do that.

SPEAKER_05 7:23

And so the 2020 election was in fact the results as we uh the American publication. I'm still researching, so let me let me I this is the first one. But there's no intelligence yet. Not yet.

SPEAKER_09 7:35

He's gotta go. He's gotta go. So there you have it. Well, they only flipped it in their own machines that we know for a fact, but they they could have flipped it in America because the protocols are the same, but we just don't know that. Okay, this is another one of those John Solomon, either you're just trying to be so perfect, we have no intelligence, or is it that we haven't reviewed all the intelligence to know yet? I don't know. But this is the kind of thing, this is what the rhinos and the moderates and the people who are like beneficiaries of what we've got going on here in the American political system, they're gonna latch on to something like that. Well, it Joe Biden still won, and all the stuff is legitimate, and the open border is what the American people wanted, and you know what I mean? It's like, no, it's not at all. So if you really want to catch up Trump's speech, you gotta go listen to it. It's not the longest speech. We're not gonna cover a ton of it today because we did the watch party yesterday. So just go on Rumble. You can watch yesterday's watch party, you can watch the whole speech. Afterwards, I commented on it. I even scrolled through Twitter. Um, but this was this was uh posted this morning. This is CNN this morning, 5 30 a.m. Pacific time, bright and early, about an hour ago. And this is Mr. Potato Head. What's his name?

SPEAKER_13 8:47

Oh shoot. Um, I gotta remember it's Mr.

SPEAKER_09 8:52

Potato Head. He got fired, got brought back. He's the guy that they bring on to say the stupid stuff, right? So he's like CNN's uh uh lifestyle and political somebody in the chat.

SPEAKER_13 9:04

Tell us what is retard's name. I can't remember.

SPEAKER_09 9:07

Hold on.

SPEAKER_13 9:07

I it's just gonna be in there.

SPEAKER_09 9:10

Nope, it's not on there.

SPEAKER_13 9:11

Dang it.

SPEAKER_09 9:12

What's his name? All right, doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. We're gonna take a listen to it. Now, one of the things that did happen yesterday was in the in the middle of the afternoon, ABC, CBS, and NBC all decided that they were not going to stream this this uh podcast.

SPEAKER_13 9:27

Oh, okay. Right there. You gotta we could have a show about that decision for hours. Yeah. What the hell?

SPEAKER_27 9:36

He did the same thing as this network, CNN, last night. The newsrooms monitored the speech, evaluated what was actually newsworthy, looked at the documents Trump was declassifying, and then reported on what happened. NBC and ABC both went on the air with special reports to explain that the speech had happened and to summarize what Trump had said, but most importantly, to contextualize it and fact-check it, just as CNN did. Now, Trump was ominously claiming that the networks were part of a plot, but the only real plot here, the only intention is to remain reality-based and truth-based.

SPEAKER_13 10:07

I'm not part of that.

SPEAKER_27 10:08

Trump's election lies led to violence after the 2020 election. So this subject really does warrant extra care and attention by journalists. And frankly, some network executives felt that it would be dangerous to just air Trump's speech live in full, unedited, without knowing what he was going to say ahead of time. That's where we are in America. And we have been here before.

SPEAKER_09 10:33

Dude, Trump is the most vindicated man on the planet that has ever, ever lived. All right, so let's look at one of the releases that came out last

DHS Noncitizen Voter Roll Allegations

SPEAKER_09 10:41

night. So this is from the Department of Homeland Security. And what this is saying here is national, you want to put it up on the screen, run? Yeah, national security investigation. Department of Homeland Security has initiated multiple investigations related to allegations of non-citizen voting and registration. Over 250,000 non-citizens are illegally registered to vote in just the four, four states for which public data files have been reviewed. All right. No, it's 250,000 in four states.

unknown 11:26

Okay.

SPEAKER_09 11:27

Four states. That's like 60,000 each per state. And frankly, most of your margins of victory for Senate. Well less than that. Way less than that.

SPEAKER_14 11:36

Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 11:36

That that's enough illegal voters on the registration, which creates a ballot which could be harvested, right? That you it's dispositive in pretty much any election in that state. I mean, governorships get get decided by less than that.

SPEAKER_13 11:50

Yeah, so you can't explain this away with words.

SPEAKER_09 11:53

No, you can't. No, you can't. Okay. So so that's a big deal. Just four states, 250,000 people. Now, let's say you did want to steal an election and you needed some outside help. How would you go about getting that? But before we do that, Robin Delane, howdy, howdy dowdy, y'all. Hope you guys are having a great day out at the farm today. Pony Boy 3255, good morning, late, late to the party. Thundering Coke, good morning after folks. Good morning after folks. It's a new world. Okay.

China Influence Plans And Social Media

SPEAKER_09 12:24

Good morning after.

SPEAKER_15 12:26

If we wanted to overthrow the country and we had some help. You know, the only other adversary of ours who's anywhere near as good as the Russians is China. So why should Russia have all the fun? And since Russia is clearly backing Republicans, why don't we ask China to back us? I hereby tonight. Ask China. That's right. And not only that, China, if you're listening, why don't you get Trump's tax returns? And they did. I'm sure our media would richly reward you. You know. What do you get Trump's tax returns?

SPEAKER_09 13:03

Our media would they did. They did get Trump's tax returns. And it does appear that China did, in fact, help. In fact, they had a specific plot to just make Trump look not so hot.

SPEAKER_22 13:25

They wanted to just make you sound like your president wasn't so hot when actually your president has done a great job.

SPEAKER_09 13:35

Okay, so let's look at some of the evidence. Again, this is just a preliminary, preliminary look. We've there's a lot of documentation that was put out. Ahead of the 2020 presidential elections, China had extensive plans to utilize potential redacted and cyber operations to sway public opinion against the Trump administration and international opinion against the U.S. government. The China plan was designed to exploit U.S. so societal fissures and vulnerabilities and influence the U.S. and other audience, and by extension, U.S. government decision making. The plans addressed several scenarios, including military conflict between the U.S. and China, as well as other potential crises. They it planned on using the perceived U.S. fissures on racial tensions. Like alleging that white people hate black people? Inciting demonstrations and marches as evidence of racial divides. BLM is China. Increasing the level of conflict between police and anti-racism activists. Okay. Feeding any sense that U.S. law enforcement resents USG and people of color. USG tensions with the U.S. military, political party disagreements, Congress Trump administration conflicts, women's rights, U.S. South China Sea policies, alleged US war aspirations, and an international propaganda. China had developed capabilities to project themes on these topics into social media, TikTok, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others, as well as mainstream media through a variety of overt and hidden influencers and media contributors. One of the options including gathering information on U.S. senior government and officials to influence public opinion on those officials. So we know that they were running an influence op. What kind of candidates did we get when they run an influence op? Do you think they want to run high-quality candidates? Not at all, right? We're just going to watch this happen in real time, right? Up in May, they have to replace Plattner because he's dropped out of the race. So they're having a little mini debate here. This is the Democrat Party, and these are their candidates that are running to replace Plattner as the Senate. And the moderator is asking, what qualifies you to run for the Senate? And this is Ashley Webb, one of the candidates to replace Graham Plattner. Now just imagine if you were CCP and you wanted to create some societal angst amongst the people of Maine about who their future leadership could be.

SPEAKER_20 15:52

Ashley Webb, what qualifications do you have to serve in the U.S. Senate?

SPEAKER_17 15:57

Oh, I ran for office several times. Didn't win, but didn't run. And then um I'm a songwriter, and then I write my own books, and then I suppose my transparency I wouldn't lie to the people and I wouldn't deceive the people like we're being deceived right now.

SPEAKER_09 16:14

Like just throw a little division of that, we're being deceived. Uh what was that? Now, you know, if you if you don't think that there's there to stoke racial tensions and uh you know hit your hot button issues, she continues.

SPEAKER_17 16:29

And then with with the trans community, like we're being dehumanized. Like say that we want to hurt people. I don't want to hurt anybody. I just want to use the bathroom. And it and if they want me to use the men's room, I will, but I don't want to be assaulted. And then with okay.

SPEAKER_09 16:47

Cause because you're high on the rape list. Like if you're nice. I'm shutting my mouth. People are people, man. My mom said if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. So CBS News this morning, they had some more breakdowns because they just don't they don't agree with this whole China thing.

Legacy Media Fact Checks And Spin

SPEAKER_09 17:14

One of the allegations was China hacked our voter registration rolls, 220 million Americans' data was released. And CBS is like, meh.

SPEAKER_12 17:23

There is a lot in here. Um, it's impossible for us to fact-check each thing that was said, but on the specific thing in regard to China that you raised, the president was informed uh when he was present in his first term um in a classified memo on January 7th, uh both the assessments regarding uh interference, and that was also public prior to that date. Uh, so he was aware, um, and we reported on this network at the time uh in regard to uh the assessments as to which foreign countries favored which election candidates. Uh he seems to be alleging there that China actively tried to undermine him and even referenced, uh, wanted to get him to resign at one point. Ahead of this, I did reach out to Chinese officials who were already prepared with a pre-buttal here. I'll read it to you. Uh, the quote is: China has long adhered to the principle of non-interference in others' internal affairs. The U.S. election is an internal matter, its outcome determined by the American people. China never and will never interfere in the presidential elections of the United States. Now, what was assessed by the intelligence community and made public as recently as I'm looking at April 2020, I want to read for you what was in the National Intelligence Council. Um, it said Chinese intelligence officials analyzed multiple states' election voter registration data to conduct public opinion analysis on the 2020 US general election. So, public opinion analysis is what the US intelligence community said the Chinese were doing. The president is alleging something far uh more um uh aggressive there and actively undermining his presidency. And I think, Tony, the question for tomorrow will continue to be and so what are you gonna do about it? Yeah, as Major said in regard to Xi Jinping. I did reach out uh to ask the embassy if, for example, the White House had given the embassy a heads up that this uh shot across the bow was going to be taken. I was told no outreach to the ambassador. I have reached out to our American ambassador in Beijing, or I have not heard back as to his assessment of what that will do to US relations. Well, it so it's kind of I heard a lot of blah, blah, blah.

SPEAKER_09 19:43

They were just doing uh public opinion, public opinion polling. I'll let you know that Paul Manafort sat in prison for giving over internal polling, just polling, internal polling data to the Russians for some Ukrainian, I don't know, whatever, public opinion data, public opinion data. He disclosed public opinion data, non-confidential, non-classified, non-government originated public opinion data with a Russian, and that became Russian collusion. Okay. So if China is taking public opinion data, shouldn't somebody who sold them or provided the public opinion data get the Manafort treatment? Give me like Liz Harrington says, Imagine if the Russian hoaxers had 1% of what the Intel community actually had on the China Biden situation. They wouldn't have made the whole thing up. So here's what it says. This is another one of the part of the reports. The private sector and open source reporting on influence activities already underway suggest that the Chinese government had been engaging in at least some level of influence, targeting U.S. voters and candidates, with the knowledge that their activities could have an effect on the election outcome. Beijing began taking unspecified steps around blank 2020 to damage the U.S. president's re-election campaign in response to U.S. pressure on China's technology sector. Planning discussions among blank, blank, blank officials to respond to U.S. pressure were taking place at increased frequency, and that senior leaders expected China's semiconductor industry would continue to be damaged if the U.S. president were re-elected. Unspecified government officials, blank, and that blank, that blank Chinese blank expected relief from sanctions if as a result of their efforts the U.S. resolve weakens, or a candidate from a named U.S. political party were elected instead of the president being re-elected. Blank blank 2020. The blank recommended that China collect derogatory black materials on the U.S. president, blank and blank and blank official uh which uh the blank recommended China sensationalize at the appropriate time. Blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank. All right. So they set out to specifically target US voters and change the discussion going on in the United States with regards to the election. They additionally took further Interactions. And again, this we knew about. There are so many elements of this that we knew about it from public reporting, but now we have the back end classified intelligence. One of the things Donald Trump said last night was that we have the absolute proof. We know these documents are real. All of this is legitimate. And they're they put it out. I think he put out four or five reports. Okay, so this one right here, this is the subject. This is county or non-state entity, United States and China, subject to Chinese government production and export of fraudulent U.S. driver's licenses to Chinese sympathizers in the United States in order to create tens of thousands of fraudulent mail-in votes for U.S. presidential candidate Joe Biden in late August 2020. A collaterative source with indirect access, none of whose reporting has been corroborated for less than one year. So I guess it's unreported. The source obtained the information from an identified subsource who claimed they obtained the information from unidentified PRC government officials. This is an informative report. Let's get down to the bottom. Text one, in late August 2020, the Chinese government had produced a large amount of fraudulent United States driver's licenses that were secretly exported to the United States. The fraudulent driver's license would allow tens of thousands of Chinese students and immigrants sympathetic to the Chinese Communist Party to vote for U.S. President candidate USPR Joe Biden. Now we know this happened up in New York. We know this was happening in Washington State. Oh yeah. But this was specific reporting to the New York report, right? This was happening at scale. This was happening at scale. And it wasn't just the voter data, it wasn't just the targeting. There were fake driver's licenses being given to Chinese students and others so that they could vote. But in addition to gathering all that information and the public opinion stuff and your ancestry.com23andMe information go on and on and on. This information is a big deal, as Catherine Herriage reports.

SPEAKER_21 23:55

China is one of the biggest collectors of data on the planet. So if you take that 220 million voter rolls and you combine it with something called the SF-86, those are the security clearance applications that were compromised back in 2015, 22 million files. And then you combine it with all of the health information that's been hacked, you can really build this kind of digital composite of an individual. And you can use that for, you know, voter registration fraud, you can use that for identity theft. And significantly, you can also use it to recruit American citizens to your efforts. So it's not just about the collection of the data around the exactly right.

SPEAKER_09 24:37

Find someone who's a disenfranchised, find some BLM-oriented type black youth, find some Antifa members, find anybody that you can drive a wedge into and then steer them into the collectivist communism. That's the good idea. And so then they become an aparatchek. Don't even know that they've been targeted. Senator Mark Warner, who is on the intelligence committee, who is one of the deep state shills. This guy is is, he and Adam Schiff are the only ones that had contact with Russians that were trying to influence the election. Mark Warner had direct contact with Christopher Steele and knew the Russian dossier was fake. This guy knew everything was fake. Okay. This guy has been a part of this all along. He's one of the deep state shills. He got into CBS yesterday and was just like, uh, you're not allowed to question elections.

SPEAKER_07 25:27

And a matter of fact, before I start, I just, as an American, not an elected official, I was embarrassed that the president of the United States went before a whole country and networks like yours carried this as news as opposed to a rehash of falsehoods. And it is incumbent upon you and any responsible journalist to push back on these falsehoods. I've been either chairman or vice chairman of the intelligence committee for the last decade.

SPEAKER_04 25:53

If I may, on that point, if I may just finish, sir.

SPEAKER_07 25:56

If I may, sir, finish, sir. If we don't call into question these falsehoods, this president is trying, he's going to lose a free and fair election. And unless responsible journalists and the American people step up and say, our system, which has stood the test of time, is not going to be undermined by this kind of falsehood, then you know, we all have to live with those responsibilities.

SPEAKER_09 26:20

What's the system Mark Warner's talking about? I call it illusion. I call it illusion. You believe, and it stood the test of time. As long as we get let you pick what you eat at night, pick where you want to live, as long as we give you a certain little level of day-to-day freedom. Don't worry about the rules. Don't worry about the government. Don't worry about any of that.

SPEAKER_13 26:43

And then also, if the media can help us with some collusion.

SPEAKER_09 26:47

Trump's about to lose a free and fair election. We can't let him look into any of it. Well, that's

Voting Machines IP Trails And Pushback

SPEAKER_09 26:54

interesting. There was one document that was put out there, and Matthew S. DiParino, Esquire, posted this. Now, it's interesting. Who's Matthew Dupreno? Matthew DuPrino is an attorney up in Michigan. He ran for Secretary of State at one point, maybe attorney general, I can't remember. And he, to me, his claim to fame was he got on a satellite news channel, cable news channel called OAN, right? One America News Network, O-A-N-N. He got on OAN and he had a Dominion voting machine, which they used to tabulate votes in Michigan. And he had 10 ballots. And you could see who was voted for on the ballots. It was like six for Trump, three for Joe Biden, one for uh Larry Johnson or whatever Johnson, whatever his name was. And he ran them through the Dominion machine, and it came out with like six votes for Joe Biden, two for Trump, and one for Johnson. It flipped votes in real time on TVs. This tabulator does not match these ballots. You're a stooge for Trump. And guess what happened? Two days later, OANN got their satellite contract pulled, got taken off Dish Network, DirecTV, Comcast, all cray cray. And they became a streaming service. Again, Mark Warner, you cannot question this stuff. Well, in one of these files here, it says this internet communications with Dominion ICX. Now, you're gonna hear something here in a second. This is kind of interesting. The news media is not up to date on this. They're debunking things with debunkable debunks. Okay. So this is Dominion machines. Of specific concern was a presence of an IP address 120.125.201.101 in the unallocated space of the tenth partition of the device.

SPEAKER_14 28:47

Okay.

SPEAKER_09 28:47

This IP address resolves back to the Ministry of Education Computer Center, 12F, number 106, section two, hopping East Road Taipei Taiwan 106. This IP address is contextually in close proximity to data that would indicate it that it was part of a socket configuration and stream of a TCP IP communications session. Okay. I don't understand all of that, but then it goes on to say this do you located at the physical sector 958273, cluster 106264, sector offset 256, file offset 544-07424. Of the storage drive, the unallocated nature of the artifact precludes the exact definition of the date and time that this data was created. Also located in prox close proximity to the Ministry of Education IP address is the IP address 62.146.7.79. This IP talking about network traffic. This IP address resolves for my conspiracy theorists out there, resolves to a cloud provider in Germany. Who remembers? Who remembers? Representative Gosart. There was a firefight in Germany. Sydney PA, there was a firefight in Germany over servers. People died. Here it is, right here. Here's the digital trail leading you back to Germany. We knew it happened in real time. There was a cover-up. And we, I say we, the Q folks, were like, see, they did it. They got it. No, they didn't. That was the cover-up. That was getting rid of the servers in Germany. Okay. It wasn't bringing them back for inspection. So we have fake news like this.

SPEAKER_04 30:32

These voting machines, the ones that I've encountered, they they have a little jump drive on the side. They don't have an internet connection. And if you were going to hack them, you would have to uh Tom Cruise your way down.

SPEAKER_09 30:45

He says the ones I've encountered as if he's like laid hands on these things.

SPEAKER_13 30:48

So so he's just talking about Tom Cruising in. He was just right in front of it. Because you've encountered him.

SPEAKER_09 30:55

It wouldn't be that hard, right now. Right. The reporting timeline here, he's going to talk about chain of custody here in just a second.

SPEAKER_04 31:02

This is bullshit. And float over it and then put in a another jump drive. But even that wouldn't work because there's a box underneath with paper duplicates. And if it doesn't match the electronic record, what are you going to do? I mean, you get you're busted already.

SPEAKER_09 31:15

There are people out there screaming, going, Not at my polling location, we tap a screen.

SPEAKER_24 31:19

There is no paper. Tony, I'm not going to correct you. You have it exactly right, and Abel had it exactly right. And what you didn't see is the chain of that is maintained around these machines at all times. They are under lock, lock, and key until they are publicly tested to make sure they haven't been tampered with. And then they are used and we still don't trust.

SPEAKER_09 31:41

Which by the way, the people who publicly test it all just got fired because none of the machines can be possibly certified.

SPEAKER_24 31:48

We have those paper ballots that we go back and audit by hand to make sure they've counted correctly. The president mentioned this. Why don't we just do that to begin with? Wait, so we're counting twice? Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 32:01

Yeah, we've got the uh we've got the digital thing, and then we count them afterwards. Why don't we just count them?

unknown 32:06

Right.

SPEAKER_24 32:06

Associated with Venezuela. That voting machine company doesn't have any machines in the United States except in Los Angeles County, in one county. No other count county in the entire country uses machines from that particular company.

SPEAKER_09 32:19

Okay. First of all, how many counties is it okay to let a foreign country have control over the election machines? Is one too many?

SPEAKER_13 32:27

Well, if you're gonna do one, LA is a good one.

SPEAKER_09 32:30

I know exactly. It's like, wow, only one, LA. Okay. Problem is this. This is they're referring to the smartmatic machines. The smartmatic guts and the smartmatic protocols are in all the machines. It's a labeling thing. So that that's just like it's patently false. These guys have no idea what they're doing.

SPEAKER_13 32:46

And I can't help it. I have to just remind everybody that the auditor down there, the elections official, used to work here in Kidsap County and know him very well, due to skis.

SPEAKER_09 32:58

You know what's funny? He had a skis employee named Darryl Dogs.

SPEAKER_24 33:02

All right. There was it was alleged that this was unknown, that this was kept secret for some time. There was literally litigation that's been gone on over the last 10 years. Ask the election officials in the state of Georgia. This has been publicly discussed for some time. We acknowledge that voting machines, like all technology, have some vulnerabilities associated with them. Nothing is perfectly secure, and we don't trust them. Voting machines are more secure than almost any other technology because they're kept under strict lock and key. They're not connected to the internet, and because we have those paper ballots that we go back to and audit to confirm the results. We all remember in Georgia, they counted those paper ballots, five million of them in five days after the election, and they confirmed those results were entitled. Five million in five days.

SPEAKER_09 33:48

Guys, these guys are in absolute panic cover, which is hilarious. You can you can hear it. You can hear it. Okay, there's always they're in parametraptron panic mode.

SPEAKER_13 33:59

I get it, it's cliche, it's a plus this high-tech stuff is so secure. We secured it with super low-tech stuff like keys.

SPEAKER_09 34:05

We put super glue on the door chamber, so nobody could get in. All right, Laura Logan posted this, of course they do all along, which begs the question who suppressed

Venezuela Smartmatic Memo And Vulnerabilities

SPEAKER_09 34:13

the truth? So this is a CIA report. This is an intelligence note. This is from June 6, 2026. So this is very recent. The intelligence community reporting from 2024 to 2020 documented persistent concerns about Venezuelan government manipulation of election voting systems and the potential national security implications for U.S. election infrastructure. The intelligence established that Venezuelan government systems, including Smartmatic technology, to influence electoral outcomes in Venezuela, the 2006 intelligence community assessment, the smartmatic ties to Venezuela pose a national security threat, was based on solid intelligence regarding Venezuela's government intent to influence U.S. politics and evidence of U.S. manipulation of their own electoral systems. So then the next page on the report just goes on to talk about how they do it, right? Replicate digital hash files sent to the central vote and counting database. This is man in the middle, mimic real voting machines that favored the ruling party, outright hash file overwrite hash files of voting machines and favored the opposition, and make altered votes appear to originate from legitimate voting machines. All of this. All of this. If the machines can do it, you don't think that Biden and Obama and their lackeys wouldn't do it, or China wouldn't do it? Really? Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_13 35:24

Really? Well, I was even just thinking about this. Like, if we voted all in person, you could still have fraud because if you just have your poll workers or the election officials or whoever's counting up the uh votes just lie and make up numbers, you could you could accomplish the same thing that you're accomplishing with these vote switching in the machines, except for you don't necessarily have the total control over everybody's decision to lie. So I I actually think the machines are better for lying because you can ensure that your workers will lie.

SPEAKER_09 35:58

Well, it's not that your workers will lie, it's that they wouldn't know. See, 2020. Yes, 2020 was bad because we have a video of Ruby Freeman double counting ballots. We have we got enough awareness of a problem that people went and looked at ballots, asked for proof when the government resisted proving the election outcome and challenged it and fought it, and chicken coops burnt down and ballot boxes were missing, and they talk about chain of custody. No, they went into Arizona and Georgia and saw boxes wide open, mislabeled, out of order, everything. No, come on, right? That made us go. Something's not right. But imagine if China could have cheated with a two to five percent margin. Didn't need to have black sharpies in Arizona, didn't need to have water leaks in Arizona and Georgia. You didn't need to shut down voting centers in Pennsylvania and put up, you know, you didn't need to do any of that because you knew you had it covered. There's a box of ballots, there's a poll tape, do a little audit on the pre-set aside ballots that we know will match whatever thing.

SPEAKER_13 37:03

I guess what I'm saying is that you do both of those things, and then that way you have plausible deniability for either one because you can't prove either one.

SPEAKER_09 37:10

You can have the most honorable people involved. I see this, I see this locally. The people that I do talk to that have gone down and done some ballot observations and been part of the Oh, you don't believe this is all bullshit. Come on, Taylor. Wait, I mean I was I was there. I was there.

SPEAKER_13 37:24

I didn't see any U-Hawks going up in the butt board.

SPEAKER_09 37:27

Yeah, well, they don't need to, right? Right? 2020, they didn't bring busloads of ballots into Kit Sap County. No, right? This is a county where you could probably steal the election with that two to five percent margin.

SPEAKER_14 37:38

Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 37:39

And we've already got mail-in ballots, you don't need to bring the busloads. You bring the bus to the drop box at the fire station up there and nobody notices it.

SPEAKER_13 37:46

Well, and even if, like, let's just pretend that this county is 90% Republican, if you've been told for the last 30 years and you believe that we're 50-50 split or it's Democrat for the last 30 years, you're gonna just think, well, that's the way it is around here.

SPEAKER_09 38:00

You know, that I remember a block party when they started doing the transgender madness around here in the schools, and we were all talking to each other, we're like, who voted for this? Somebody on this street.

unknown 38:11

Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 38:12

Must be the other street. Must be the other street. Like nobody voted for this.

SPEAKER_14 38:17

Right.

SPEAKER_09 38:17

And that's the thing. Yes, you're right, Ron. Around here, if you've got 10 kids in a classroom and one kid wants to go to the bathroom in the wrong bathroom because he's having gender dysphoria, and there's a single other kid that supports him, the teacher, or whoever's ideologically driven, will go, see, he supports him, he's being a good kid. And the other nine kids that want to be virtuous, want to be nice, want to be kind, are like, shut up, sit down, you're in the minority, and it's eight to two. You know, and that's like the whole thing. As long as they weaponize your virtue to shut up, sit down, don't speak up, stop causing a problem. We don't get to the bottom of this stuff. So here is CNN reviewing Trump's speech, the what they considered the highlights.

SPEAKER_01 38:58

Level set for us. There are a lot of claims that are made tonight. What, if anything, did we actually learn that was new and substantiated?

SPEAKER_06 39:07

Well, Laura, look, we've had a team here at CNN going through all these documents. This is just a small number. There are about 500 of them. And it's new stuff. There is new material in here because classified materials. But as you just pointed out, for everything that Trump is raising, it seems like there's always a counterpoint, a rebuttal, a piece of context that needs to be included. So a couple key points here that we found. One of the things that the White House has been touting all night is that they're arguing that China got access to 200 million voter files for 200 million Americans. What they might not have pointed out is that a lot of those voter files, you can buy them online. A lot of the states sell them. And also, intelligence agencies have said for years that China is trying to get as much data as they can get its hands on. And the intelligence report said that China was hacking voter files.

SPEAKER_09 39:58

The smile on his face makes you think this doesn't matter. I mean, they can just buy the data from some states, but not all the states. But not all the states. Just because states are stupid enough to sell it, doesn't mean that the states that don't sell it should be hacked.

SPEAKER_06 40:19

Another key point in these new documents, concerns that Venezuela was experimenting with software that could flip votes. This has been a claim that has been uh coming up over and over and over since 2020 from Trump allies. We looked at the CIA memo that described that uh allegation, and it made pretty clear that yeah, Venezuela might be able to do that at home, but the assessment from the CIA was that they wouldn't be able to do that abroad in the U.S.

SPEAKER_09 40:49

That's not what it said at all. We just read it.

SPEAKER_06 40:52

There was new information.

SPEAKER_09 40:54

We just read it. Not only did he admit they haven't gone all through all the documents, not only is he injecting that, but we always want to make a counterpoint or rebuttal. We can just say whatever the flip we want. He's just lying. He's just lying. But also the intelligence report doesn't say it's vulnerable here. No, it says the exact opposite. The exact opposite. These guys wouldn't air the speech. They want to get the right the the jump on the law first impression and tell you all this stuff. It is the exact opposite. 98% of America will not wake up this morning and go look at the original source material. Seven years ago, six years ago, I was on the CNN app, and every single posted news story didn't have a cited source. It didn't have a reference that I could go check original source material or anything. It was an entire day of news generated by anonymous, uncited sources. But if you all derogatory to the President Trump about the most important thing you could possibly imagine that he is a traitor and working with Russia to overthrow our government.

SPEAKER_13 42:03

And the thing is, is if you've got TDS, you're eating it up. And you're not even gonna bother to look anywhere to check anything. You're just gonna go, yep, Trump's doing it again.

SPEAKER_09 42:15

This is what he's talking about. Yeah. The very thing they accuse him of doing half-truths, not totally complete, he just did it. And I wrote you the document just prior to playing this clip.

SPEAKER_13 42:28

And people need to understand, you know, if you think that the media is not involved in this, what is going on right here? Why are they not covering a president's speech? Do they have IQs of 72? Anything he says. I mean, we don't agree with anything Biden says, but we want to see him speak uh say a speech. Yeah. So, because we want to know what the president is thinking.

SPEAKER_09 42:52

And nobody, their own hero, Joe Biden, the guy with the stutter and all the challenges that he overcame to become the president of the United States, said, if any country comes after our elections, you will be punished. Okay. All right, let's do it. What evidence did you have Russia meddled? Well, not really any. We punched them, right? So don't you think the punishment on China should be, I don't know, a thousand times that? Hey, let's go, Tucker Carlson. If you have substantiated claims that some country has interfered in our elections, that's as bad as a nuclear attack. It's all at war. What do you think about the case?

SPEAKER_11 43:26

Q Hillary Clinton clip where, well, Russia's been involved with the Republicans, so come on, China, you're on our side.

unknown 43:33

Woo woo-hoo-hoo.

SPEAKER_06 43:35

Exactly. What the White House claimed showed from the Department of Homeland Security. 250,000 non citizens on the voter rolls. That's their allegation. We looked deeper into the data, and the sources of that information are just Hey, can you pause that for a second?

SPEAKER_13 43:53

I just got this dude. I don't know the character's name, but he ever seen uh trailer park boys?

SPEAKER_09 44:00

Yeah, bubbles.

SPEAKER_13 44:01

It looked like bubbles. I can't help but see him.

SPEAKER_09 44:04

Madam Spin says that's why the Charstow story is so damaging when people finally realize the media's story was fake. They continued doing the same thing. Yeah, right.

SPEAKER_13 44:12

This is highlighting it. For people who have TDS, Pete, please just take 30 seconds to realize what you're doing here.

SPEAKER_09 44:20

Yeah. Let's listen to the 250,000 illegal aliens.

SPEAKER_06 44:24

And the sources of that information are just not so reliable. When you looked at the better source, the government sources that assess the who's a citizen, who's not, it was a much smaller number, only about 28,000. Laura Marcel.

SPEAKER_09 44:40

Okay, so four states, Department of Homeland Security report that we just read said 250,000. And he's sitting here going, Oh, but if you get down to the other data, the other reports, the government data? You're talking about from the states, states that were covering up their voter roll problems, not the DHS, which is also government, which double-checked the states' lying work. Dude, like people waking up today and watching the news, I feel horrible. When I was in prison, I did not have access to the internet, right? I only had cable news. CNN, MSNBC, which became MS Now, Fox News, News Max, ABC, NBC, CBS. And every day at 5 p.m. or 6 p.m., whatever time the news came on, I'd go into the TV room and they would always be watching ABC or CBS or NBC because it was prime time, big time news, right? I'd watch CN. These there are people that just turn on the news, right? That's what they're getting. They're getting their programming. They're getting their programming.

Intel Disputes And Withheld Briefings

SPEAKER_09 45:48

Yep. Here's Mark Warner again with Jensaki. Again, I believe Jen Saki is part of this. Remember, picture of her with the Obama Klan wearing the Russian hat with the hammer and sickle in it. She's a communist. Okay. Mark Warner, intelligence community. He's been on, he's been around this whole time in the background. He's probably one of the apparatus of the deep state, telling the media, hey, I know John Radcliffe's the director of the CIA, but you'll be gone in two years. But I've been on the intelligence committee for 10. Don't hear the speech.

SPEAKER_07 46:18

He was also briefed on this as well at the time. Matter of fact, he was briefed on January 7th. And the irony here, I don't mean to be disrespectful, but John Radcliffe, his current CIA director, was the director of national intelligence. So this conclusion, bipartisan conclusion, that most of this has been public was signed off by his current CIA director. So is he gonna be on this hit list of victims? Okay.

SPEAKER_09 46:46

Mark Warner, you're a piece of crap. You knew China was interfering. The documents that were released, and we might get to one of these here in a minute. The documents were released showed internal emails between the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence saying that they were covering up the allegations of fraud. They were not looking into China. The January 7th report that John Ratcliffe said said that the intelligence community had concluded that Russia had interfered, but that China had not. And Ratcliffe's observation was the activities that Russia took were identical to the activities China took, but over here you labeled it interference. Over here you labeled it influence. What was the difference? Right? So you can't like and and so he objected. So when Mark Warner here saying, well, he signed off on it. No, he objected to the reporting from the intelligence community. He objected to it. He knew it was bad back then. That should have raised red flags, but it didn't. You know why? Because on January 7th, 2021, you know what they were doing on TV, showing endless clips of January 6th. At this point, I think the Democrat would probably tell, because at some point they're going to start to concede some of these facts, right? And at the end of the show, you're going to see they're already starting to do it this morning. They're going to concede some of the facts. Mark my words. Uh, this attack on our elections in 2020 was the worst attack on our democracy until January 6, 2021. That's what they're going to start saying, right? That's what the haters will say. All right. So this is um Jonathan Carl over on ABC. And he's talking about uh Donald Trump's statement that our elections have fallen catastrophically short.

SPEAKER_08 48:31

The president made some extraordinary allegations. I mean, he said that our election system, our security is catastrophically short. It dangerously exposes, exposed to hacking. Uh there's when you have no trust, there is no greatness, and we can't trust our election uh systems. But I looking through these dialogues, we have a lot more to look through. I don't see anything that comes anywhere near making that case. What I see is uh uh documents presented that are intended uh to raise doubts about our security, but nothing that suggests there is actually a security issue with our elections.

SPEAKER_09 49:06

And for specifically, Mary, and this is one we'll all be looking at there was nothing to suggest there's actually a security issue except all the sentences that explicitly state that and the summary of all these reports.

SPEAKER_13 49:18

And maybe you could just be helpful with our doubts.

SPEAKER_08 49:21

Yeah. He said that the Department of Homeland Security has identified 278,000 non-citizens on voting rolls. I don't know where he got that number. We're gonna ask. Pierre Thomas is gonna look into this. Uh, but I do know this. Uh, there have been repeated efforts to try to document by people allied with President Trump to document the allegation that non-citizens have voted in federal elections. And there has been no significant evidence presented. The Heritage Foundation, a very strongly pro-Trump organization, has a database to collect uh examples of voter fraud. They looked at 1982 to 2025, uh, a span of decades, and they came up with so far, uh Mary, uh about 100 documented cases, they say, where a non-citizen voted in a U.S. election. Uh, in other words, statistically insignificant to say the least.

SPEAKER_09 50:22

Except if you go look at that report, they were only reporting those that were prosecuted, which amounted to very little. And then the conclusion of the report is you're not prosecuting enough. Basically, you guys are turning a blind eye to this because you always just assume it's not happening, and these are all one-off cases, right? Like, oh, it's just one lady spilled out 10 ballots. It's like, how where'd she get the idea to do that? Who told her that that was something she could do? Here isn't what it looks like when intelligence, someone in intelligence realizes that the information is being cooked. Take a minute and read through this report. This is coming from somebody in the intelligence community. This is a national intelligence officer, cyber ODNI National Intelligence Council. So this is somebody important. Take a minute and read through this report. It cites some of the same intel and logic used in 2020 to say that these same units were not engaged in election influence, but were instead only issue focused, to now argue that China is influencing blank election, the regional influence, focus on issues, et cetera. They literally cite a support for their argument, some of the same reporting used in the mainline assessment in our minority report. For example, they cite blank activity as being the Chinese military, even though in 2020 the I said we didn't know who it was. The report describes the same unit that blank and I said were influencing the US 2020 election and now characterize it as an election influence unit that attributes it to the Chinese government. That's a weird coincidence, and one we should highlight for oversight, FBI and redacted, redacted, redacted. We should consider how this looks. How does it look? This looks, it's inconsistent. On what logical, nonpartisan basis the IC make makes calls one way or the other? Why is this unit engaged in election influence in the blank and blank to promote China's interest? But when they do it here, it's an issue influence, but somehow not election related. It's the same personnel doing the same kind of activity. When you know you're cooking it, but Mark Warner can get out there and go uh there's no evidence, there's no conclusion. Yeah, because it got cooked down at the bottom, right? One of the allegations Trump made was they never briefed me on this stuff. They literally pulled it out of the presidential daily briefs and they provided a ton of emails to that. Literally, we're holding off. We're waiting. We're not going to show them this. Why? Because every day you wait is a day that you can't go to the courts, you can't engage the military to do, you know, to do cyberpower.

SPEAKER_13 52:52

DOGs. The DOJ has been weaponized as well. You know, we got judges that are just making stuff up.

SPEAKER_16 52:59

Let me bring in now our chief White House correspondent Garrett Haig, who is joining us from the North Lawn. And Garrett, President Trump previously for years had pushed conspiracy theories about election fraud. So bring us up to speed tonight. What did he say, if anything, that was new?

SPEAKER_03 53:13

Broadly speaking, much of this would sound familiar to people who followed the president. He described the U.S. election system as falling, in his words, catastrophically short of the standards we should have for election security, and described a declassification and review of American election records that broadly fell into several categories, including that uh obtaining of voter information by China. Another category as relates to activities that were taking place in Venezuela, a third category on cover-ups, and a fourth on uh domestic, let's call them voter irregularities, including a focus specifically on one GOTV group in Michigan. He concluded with a line, I don't know whether it was scripted or ad-lib, saying that stolen elections cannot happen again, but never did he use the data he was presenting to make a case that any specific election was stolen, merely that there were these categories of vulnerabilities. He concluded with a push to pass the Save America Act, a piece of legislation that would overhaul parts of the voting system in this country, namely requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship to both register and to vote, casting that as a prescription. But again, the prescription didn't exactly match up with the complaints that the president outlined throughout the course of this. As you said, Halley, hundreds of pages of documents here released by the White House with uh information we still have to review to find what exactly is new and what's supported by other information publicly available.

SPEAKER_16 54:37

And our team's looking through it, Garrett. Thanks, including our national security and global affairs reporter, Dan Deleuze. And Dan, one of the questions people will ask, was there anything revealed by the president? Is there anything in these documents that would have changed any actual vote count?

SPEAKER_00 54:50

I didn't hear that in that speech. He talked about uh China not wanting him to get elected. He talked about them getting a hold of this voter data, but I didn't hear him, and I haven't seen in these documents so far, some kind of indication that China or another foreign actor penetrated our voting system, got into a state's election counting system, tampered with ballots. He didn't talk about that. I don't see it yet in the documents. He's not even really alleging that. So I think the case is still out there. Um as far as we know, and as there's such overwhelming evidence, Joe Biden won that election. And he's also not making clear what should be done now exactly. Because he's talked about the federal government should take over the process, but he kind of left that open in that speech.

SPEAKER_09 55:35

Is there anything new? Well, we haven't been over anything, but no. No, it's all been litigated. There's see, when you design a system to not have an audit trail and checks and balances, it's hard to dispositively prove a vote was flipped. What do we what did we learn from the Tina Peters case? They took those machines and they overwrote the data on them and put different data on it. We have from the Tina Peters case a day before, day after forensic look at these things. We know down in Puerto Rico we have the same thing. We believe we've got machines in Georgia. We know there were at least four other Tina Peters out there. Tina Peters is the only one who got caught.

SPEAKER_10 56:16

Okay.

SPEAKER_09 56:16

We also had the election earlier this year, or was it last year in Texas, where they got caught, like actual vote manipulation. So that's common, folks. Just because CNN doesn't cover it, doesn't mean it's not a true fact. This was litigated. It's been through court, there's court filings and all

Michigan Registration Fraud And FBI Stalls

SPEAKER_09 56:32

that kind of stuff. Here's an example up in Michigan, there was industrial scale voter fraud. These these documents here, what happened was the Michigan State Police raided a get out the vote center, the Democrat get out the vote center. And what they found was so disturbing that they turned it over to the FBI. Okay. So then these emails are kind of the back and forth between the Michigan State Police and the FBI. Melch received a small quantity when the larger quantities of voter registration applications by mail from a female later identified as Blank. It was found that Blank was working for a company called Blank and also went by the name Blank. Meesh stated that in her opinion, a quantity quantity of the voter registration forms were highly suspicious and possibly fraudulent. Melch's opinion was based on the fact that numerous forms appeared to have been completed by the same writer, and upon initial examination, addresses on multiple forms were invalid or non-existent. Meesh investigated further and found that phone numbers on multiple forms were erroneous and signatures on multiple forms didn't appear to match signatures on file with the Department of Secretary of State. Examples include an address like address in the blank and another in the blank, whose addresses do not exist in the Muskegon County House numbering system. Another form listed 80 West Southern Avenue, which is an address for Muskegon High School and is clearly not a residence. Meesh found that all the suspected fraudulent applications came from the mailing address blank at two locations. Initial forms were dropped off by 10820 just before the election by a blank who identified himself as Blank, and Blank stated that he was employed by Blank and stated the company was working to register voters and help register voters obtain absentee ballots, provided her cell phone number. Meesh later stated she found her blank on Facebook and stated the picture, and then it goes on. So they they found something pretty suspicious. They go through, they look at where the money came from for these people. Democratic senatorial campaign, DNA services, Democratic Party of Iowa, Black PAC. Why is Iowa donating in Michigan? I have no idea. Biden again, this is all just money laundering.

SPEAKER_13 58:31

Yeah, I think they trade money back and forth.

SPEAKER_09 58:33

Yeah, the money ended up in in Ohio, Iowa. They don't need it, send it to Michigan. It's all money laundering. Black Church Pack, Julian for the future, and League of Conservation Voters, a bunch of green party people. All right, so here's what it says. Adam, we'll chat with you at 5 30 p.m. And then it's this is the public corruption unit, the United States Attorney. So now the United States attorney is emailing the Michigan government, Michigan State Troopers. It says, I'll give you a call back. Then it says Detroit police polling incident. Dave, attach, please find an email from attorney in Michigan that describes what appears to be ballot fraud in Detroit. This allegation and accompanying photos is alarming. I would like the FBI to look into this, please. Could you please follow up, Matthew? Then it continues on down here. I'm following up with some information from one of the most egregious situations I encountered over the past few days at the TCF Center. There were many examples of significant election integrity issues, but this example involves actions of government officials from both the local and state levels that are shocking if true. And at very least, I think it's worth dot dot dot. Probably looking into. Then it goes on to here. Highlighted, talked to the FBI on this, and it's not going to be in their lane or ours. It seems of it it reams of apparent uh criminal action, but MMOS may want to call and try to head this off. It was a cover-up. They covered it up. There was industrial scale voter fraud, and they headed it off. They covered it up. Headline from that time massive voter fraud involving thousands of fraudulent ballot registrations took place in Michigan in 2020. And lawless Dana Nessel and then Chris Ray let all of the perpetrators walk free. There were other stuff from the interviews, because remember, the state police and the FBI did interview people, and you had people in there singing like canaries. Yes, I filled out fake ballots. My boyfriend filled out fake ballots. Yes, we were getting paid in marijuana and gift cards for bringing in these registration ballots. $400 every two days. They cheated, folks. They cheated. And the fact that we were prevented from fully litigating that stuff, that the FBI shut down investigations like that created the probable believability that Joe Biden somehow got 81 million votes. Okay. Here's CBS continuing to break down the president's arguments.

SPEAKER_18 1:00:55

I hear that there is an assessment. Oh, this is this is this is okay.

SPEAKER_09 1:01:01

Over the next few days, some of the legacy media is gonna have to concede some of these points.

SPEAKER_14 1:01:07

Okay.

SPEAKER_09 1:01:08

Some of the things that are gonna be revealed in these documents, you're not gonna be able to say there wasn't shenanigans in Michigan. You're not gonna be able to say there wasn't shenanigans going on with some of this stuff, right? At a minimum, they're gonna have to start to concede some of these things. Okay, here's one of the first concessions.

SPEAKER_18 1:01:24

I hear that there is an assessment that in an abstract experiment, it was found that one type of machine might be vulnerable. One type of machine. I hear that there is an assessment that only one?

SPEAKER_09 1:01:46

This is called capitulation. Okay, one machine could be vulnerable.

SPEAKER_14 1:01:51

One type of machine.

SPEAKER_09 1:01:52

Okay, could could that be the father of all the machines? Was that assessment done before there were four different voting companies that all came from the same nepotonistic, you know, nepotism singular sequoia, you know, like smart attic? Oh my goodness. Watch for it, watch for the capitulation. But every time they capitulate, they're gonna hedge. They're gonna hedge.

Collectivism Culture War And Motivation

SPEAKER_09 1:02:16

You know why they're gonna hedge? Because they can't possibly allow truth and justice and fairness and the will of the people to take place. Yeah, because the people that want to overthrow our country, they're all bound together by a similar ideology destructive collectivism. Communists, relic Russians that still hold on to the Soviet way of doing things, Latin American socialists and communists, Cubans, Chinese, communism. Just like communism and collectivism has done since the beginning of time. Ayn Rand has one of the best monologues on this in uh Atlas Shrugged, where it talks about who invented fire, right? And how things become collectivized over time. And the reason it gets collectivized is because of jealousy and envy. Not always because of capitalism, right? Sometimes the people who create new things, in the end, it gets taken from them by the haters. Stephen Miller gave a speech yesterday at the resurgence of political terrorism conference, and he talked about this mentality, and this is what we're seeing. Anyone who doesn't just want to look, anybody who doesn't just want to have it be fair and transparent so we can all agree. We are not having arguments over tax rates, we are not having arguments over basic things, we're having arguments quite literally to quote Joe Biden over the soul of the nation. Who are we? America is a nation of builders and creators. In 250 short years, we went from the horse and wagon, and we went from absolute worldwide poverty, starv everything you can think of. The world had changed very little since the crucifixion of Christ and the the Declaration of Independence. All we'd done is expand our reach, but the world had changed very, very little. Progress was incremental until the individual was unleashed. Until the individual was unleashed to improve his own circumstance and then improve his life by sharing it with others through the process of capitalism and free markets.

SPEAKER_19 1:05:14

The leftist is fundamentally motivated by envy, by hatred, by jealousy. The leftist looks at what is beautiful and what is good and what is natural and is filled with envy and hatred. The leftist looks at a perfect family with a perfect life and a perfect job and perfect kids, it goes to church every Sunday and is filled with a feeling of inadequacy and jealousy, and they covet, and they turn those emotions ultimately into a desire to subjugate, to oppress, and to inflict pain and suffering. It's not a coincidence that when you look at these violent Antifa demonstrations. You see any photograph of those who are assembled, to be blunt, not one of the people that is demonstrating looks like a normal person. Not one looks normal. They're all deformed in some way in their appearance, in their address, in their mannerism. Why is that? Why you look at two photographs and you see an you know a normal American street, you see an Antifa protest. Why do the people that are violently demonstrating? Why is there not one normal looking person among them? Every one of them, through the course of their life and their decisions, has scarred their body and their appearance in many different ways to the point in which their outer appearance becomes a manifestation of their inner hatred. Trust your instincts to all people and across all civilizations. You know what normal is, you know what beautiful is, you know what good is, you know that families are right, you know that children are precious and beautiful and must be protected. You know that the criminal and the junkie and the predator is a threat to normal, healthy living. This is so much deeper than than issues about taxation and regulation, although they're incredibly important. It's about normal, healthy, ordered living.

SPEAKER_09 1:07:15

That is what it is. And it reflects not just in the people who adopt that, but in the governments that do too. In competence, inadequately, long lines at the DMV, ineffectiveness, they don't do their jobs. What's the point of having a department called Border Patrol if the border is wide open? You know, I mean what it I think Stephen Miller was spot on there. On any other day, we would have spent a lot of time focusing on Stephen Miller's speech and Marco Rubio's speech at that event. They were phenomenal. But Trump changed the tide. Now, John Solomon, we started out with him being like, oh, there's no evidence of anything, but we're still not done.

SPEAKER_25 1:07:51

There's more to come. I can speak for the country to thank uh Bill Poulty and yourself and your task force. What you accomplished this speech tonight on the work that you guys have done in the last, I don't know, three and a half, four weeks after six years of this nonsense, as we now know, goes even back that maybe to 2018 or before. It's just nothing short of monumental and heroic. So I first off want to give you guys a thanks for giving the president finally the information from the Intelligence Earth to do it. Tell us about it. What did you think of the speech?

SPEAKER_02 1:08:24

Yeah, first off, President Trump deserves the credit for allowing this to happen. The intelligence officers who work day in and out people working 18 hours a day to get this work done. They deserve the credit. They find this stuff. I don't have a class uh security card, so they go get it, and then we figure out what makes sense for the American public and we may release it. Tonight's the opening salvo. It's the beginning of a longer um extra exfiltration of information in the intelligence committee. But what's important about tonight is to understand actionable intelligence, things that actually affected our um our security of our elections were not being told to the president. They were not being told to Congress. Policymakers couldn't make a decision because bureaucrats decided they were more important than a president or a congressman. And I'm very concerned about that ethos because if it does it in elections, what about a foreign power, a war? What if someone doesn't want to tell the president about something else? There's a cultural stain in the intelligence community that this data shows that we're gonna have to go back and look at other issues and see if this was a pattern in other forms of intelligence. Yeah.

SPEAKER_14 1:09:26

Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 1:09:27

Why? Because the collectivist hates everything that's good. They hate our country, they hate our constitution, they hate our beautiful cities, they hate our nuclear families, they hate our churches. They'll do anything to chip away at it.

SPEAKER_13 1:09:41

Get that hate out of your heart, people.

SPEAKER_09 1:09:43

Get that hate out of your heart. Trump finished up his speech in a very reaching across the aisle way.

SPEAKER_22 1:09:50

Great damage has been done to our country. Our elections were left vulnerable to being rigged and stolen, and the trust of the American people was lost. This cannot be allowed to continue. Every American, whether you're a Republican, Democrat independent, or otherwise, should be able to agree that we deserve the most secure, honest, and fair election system anywhere in the world. Secure elections should be partisan, really. Should just we should be together. And it should not be a partisan issue. It should cause to unite us, not to divide us. This should be a cause. We should be united, not uh divided. Absolutely.

SPEAKER_09 1:10:38

We should be united, not divided. Anyone who says the election wasn't tampered with, go listen to Joe Biden. He said it was. He even included, and now, you know, maybe a little bit of China. Yeah. So what you gonna do? He's gonna, oh well, the Joe Biden didn't know. Hey, the elections are fine. Mail and ballots, these funky machines, totally fine. Nothing to see here, folks. Anybody who wants to keep it the way it is, they want to keep it the way it is because it's chipping away at our civilization one step at a time. We live in a country where we have candidates like the one I showed you, Ashley Webb, trying to take Platinum space. Might turn out that Platinum could have been the better choice. I don't know. Okay. But up in Michigan, trouble, trouble Michigan, you also have campaigning going on, and they've got a female Chris Farley running for office.

SPEAKER_10 1:11:34

You better believe I'm gonna be doing it with a little bit of joy, a little bit of enthusiasm, a little bit of energy, and a little bit of sick it to them, because that's the Michigan way. And you kids are probably saying to yourselves, hey, I'm gonna go out and I'm gonna get the world by the tail and wrap it around and pull it down and put it in my pocket. Well, I'm here to tell you that you're probably gonna find out as you go out there if you vote for Democrats. You're not going to amount to Jack Squad. You're gonna end up eating a steady diet of government cheese and living in a van down by the river. But don't worry, the buses and the cheese will be free.

SPEAKER_09 1:12:17

The Michigan way! I love it, man.

Closing Reflections Virtue And Justice

SPEAKER_09 1:12:20

All right, guys, that's the show for today. Thank you so much for joining us. Big day yesterday. I felt so vindicated. I really did. I mean, uh my speech on the Capitol Steps, as I described yesterday, was about China and about the you know, Mike Pence. And there was a connection there, and vindicated, vindicated, you know, that you can't go back and look at that in a vacuum. And as so often happened in my life, I'm always a little bit over the horizon than most people. And this is something, you know, I we all have things in our life where as you get older, you can reflect and you go, huh, there must be some characteristic about myself that puts me over the horizon, that puts me a little bit a couple steps ahead of whoever group or peer group I am, right? I kind of see things changing a little bit. I've used it to my advantage in business from time to time. I, you know, I can think of a million examples where I'm just a year or two ahead of where everyone else is going to be eventually. Okay. I figure it out and I I usually am, I I've often called myself an icebreaker. And I look at January 6th and I think that same thing. In 2020, people knew things were weird, but didn't quite get how much. And we were fortunate enough to have documented all of that progress on the peasants' perspective season one, right? And leading up to that, there was no doubt in my mind that we were losing our country in 2020. There was no doubt in my mind, and nothing has disproven those things. Nothing has disproven it. The truth just needs to be spoken and it will win.

SPEAKER_13 1:13:52

I have the exact same question still swirling around my head that that is why I started this whole thing to begin with. I just want to know that our elections are fair and honest. You know, please, people, just I just want to know that we have fair and free elections. And so far to date, I mean, everybody you can say, well, it's already settled. No, it's not. It's not settled in my mind, and I need help.

SPEAKER_09 1:14:24

Just because the people acquiesced and moved on, right, doesn't mean that that vindicated the result. No, it just means we moved on. Right. Right. And when you have a nation of slaves where most families have do not have $500 available to them, right? They're gonna go to work the next day. Yeah. They're not gonna go protest and pick it unless they're getting paid to. Right. Unless you're J6, or in which case 75% small business owners, 30% pastors, 50% small, you know, homeschool dads, like we would show up because we had the means and resources. But yeah, absolutely. Robin Delane, I cared about making a difference. Maybe my virtue was weaponized. That is what happens.

SPEAKER_13 1:15:05

Yep.

SPEAKER_09 1:15:05

That is what happens. Your virtue gets weaponized. You know, there's a scene in the show Landman, and we played a clip on the show a long time ago, and I am not by any means machismo or chauvinist or you know, I I even though it sounds like it. I'm not, you know. I mean, I obviously, you know, men tend to be larger and stronger than I'm not gonna not state the obvious, but there's this that interesting clip we played a while ago that talked about in a in a psychological study that's been repeated many times. Uh when you put a group of men and women in a in a board game or a card game and somebody is cheating, everybody universally is frustrated at the cheating. Universally, right? Men and women have the same reaction. But then when the cheater gets caught and gets punished, the men have a sensation of joy. They get serotonin and dopamine out of it to see justice, fairness being restored. Women have the same exact chemical emotion of disgust when the cheater gets punished who they felt disgusted about as well. So what happens is that is where the wedge is to weaponize virtue. Nobody wants to see someone get hurt or cheated or harmed. We universally feel bad. But when a male sees that hurt or harm as an act of justice, they feel satisfied. Women don't see the justice, they just see another hurt. And so they're the ones who go, Well, yeah, he's a criminal, but we need to give him mercy and not send him to show. We need to rehabilitate him.

SPEAKER_14 1:16:37

Right.

SPEAKER_09 1:16:38

They start having virtue towards the criminal that they should be directing towards the victim. Men will generally direct it towards the victim and do no mercy to the criminal, right? That wedge, when Robin says here, my virtue is weaponized, that's the process. And it's not just women, men do it too, right? Aren't you supposed to be charitable and not judge your neighbor? Well, can I judge the man whose dress is a woman, hurting children inside of public restrooms? Can I judge him a little bit? Is it okay? Can I just do it a little bit? Can I just do a little bit? No, you're bad. No judging. God would never judge anybody. All right, guys. Yes, weaponized weaponization of our virtue. Ayn Rand describes that perfectly. It's a process of white blackmail. All right, guys, thank you so much for joining us. We will talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.

Monty Python Peasants Sendoff

SPEAKER_26 1:17:52

I'm twenty-seven. I'm twenty-seven. Well, I couldn't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I did say something about the old woman. From behind you, if you automatically treat me like an imperialist. Well, I'm kidding. Did you get that? Hanging on to a stated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress. How do you do, good lady? Um king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. The Britons. We all are. We are all Britons. I am your king. No, we have a king. We thought we're an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictator. Stop perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes are working classes in the game. That's what it's all about. Please, good people. I'm in haste. Who lives in that castle? Who lives in that cast? Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco syndicalist commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Or you should be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake. Um clad in the purest humoring same. Hilda Love Excalibur from the bottom of the water. Signifying by the cabin excaliber. That is what I'm your king. Listen, strange women love and imponce. Distributed thoughts is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power is from a mandate from the message, not from some philosophy or aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to world supreme executive power just because some water reports. Just because some moisture loves the symmetry.